「歷代明鑑」의 撰集樣相에 관한 硏究

• Published in: 서지학연구, 0(71) pp. 27 - 54
• Main Author: 박문열
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Korean
• Published: 한국서지학회 30.09.2017
• Subjects: 문헌정보학
• ISSN: 1225-5246; 2671-8758
• DOI: 10.17258/jib.2017..71.27

본 硏究는 「歷代明鑑」에 收錄된 人物의 選取類型과 「歷代明鑑」 卷4에 나타나는 類型別 撰集樣相을 중심으로 하여 「歷代明鑑」의 撰集樣相의 全般에 관하여 考察한 것으로 그 結果는 다음과 같다. (1) 「歷代明鑑」은 洪貴達과 權健 및 成俔 등이 王命을 받들어 撰集한 도합 27권 巨帙의 鑑戒書이다. (2) 「歷代明鑑」에는 <君鑑>에 77인, <后妃鑑>에 44인, <臣鑑>에 199인 등 도합 320人物이 底本으로부터 轉載․除去되거나 原典인 本史로부터의 添入으로 選取․收錄된 것이다. (3) 「歷代明鑑」의 收錄人物은 底本으로부터 <君鑑>의 경우 ‘善可爲法’에는 13인이 除去되었으며, ‘惡可爲戒’에는 2인이 除去되고 3인이 添入되었으며, <臣鑑>의 경우 ‘善可爲法’에는 89인이 除去되고 9인이 첨입되었으며, ‘惡可爲戒’에서는 34인이 除去되고 18인이 添入되어 <君鑑>과 <臣鑑>의 兩鑑에 걸쳐 도합 138인이 除去되고 30인이 添入되었다. <后妃鑑>의 경우 除去나 添入이 없이 모든 人物이 그대로 轉載되고 있어, 이는 아마도 底本인 「帝王后妃明鑑」이 朝鮮의 撰集인 관계에서 말미암은 것이 아닌가 한다. (4) 「歷代明鑑」 권4에 수록된 3朝 10人 88條目의 撰集樣相은 33條目의 ‘轉載’, 24條目의 ‘撮其切要’, 29條目의 ‘删其繁蕪’, 1人物 17條目의 ‘去其全條’, 1條目의 ‘添入新段’ 등의 방법이 사용되었다. (5) 「歷代明鑑」에 수록된 人物의 選取와 「歷代明鑑」 卷4에 수록된 類型別 撰集樣相 등을 통하여 볼 때, 「歷代明鑑」은 人物의 選取에서부터 人物別 鑑戒의 內容에 이르기까지 朝鮮의 實情에 맞도록 釐正․重撰된 것임을 미루어 짐작할 수 있다. This study analyzes on the types of compilation of the Yeokdaemyeonggam(歷代明鑑) from the types of selected person and types of compilation based on the Yeokdaemyeonggam volume 4. The major findings are as follows: (1) The Yeokdaemyeonggam is a Gamgyeseo(鑑戒書) that consists of 27 volumes compiled by Hong Gwi Dal(洪貴達), Gwon Geon(權健), and Seong Hyeon(成俔) under the king’s order. Gamgeyoso is a type of record book containing exemplary words and behaviors of selected persons from the Chinese and Joseon dynasties. The purpose of this book is to educate our sovereigns and loyal retainers. (2) The Yeokdaemyeonggam contains the records of 320 historic figures. Of the total of 320 figures, Gungam(君鑑) contains records of 77 figures, Hubigam(后妃鑑) contains records of 44 figures, and Singam(臣鑑) contains records of 199 figures. Some of the records were reproduced from their source texts, while some records of the source texts were removed and some texts were added to the original texts. (3) Compared with the source texts, in Gungam, 13 figures were removed in the section “Good Manners(善可爲法),” while 2 figures were removed and 3 figures were added in the section “Bad Manners(惡可爲戒).” In Singam, 89 figures were removed and 9 figures were added in the section “Good Manners,” while 34 figures were removed, and 18 figures were added in the section “Bad Manners.” In Gungam and Singam, a total of 138 figures were removed, and 30 figures were added. Hubigam contains the records of all figures included in the source text without any removal or addition, presumably because its source text, Jewanghubimyeonggam, was compiled by the Joseon Dynasty. (4) As for the compilation style of the 88 subsections on 10 figures in 3 dynasties, 33 subsections reproduced the source materials, 24 subsections summarized the main points of the source materials (撮其切要), 29 subsections abbreviated the source materials by removing parts that are not critical(删其繁蕪), 17 subsections withdrew sentences from the source materials(去其全條), and 1 subsection added new sentences to the source material(添入新段). (5) By looking into the selection of figures included in the Yeokdaemyeonggam as well as the compilation styles for its Volume 4, it can be inferred that the Yeokdaemyeonggam was modified and compiled so as to bring them in congruence with the realities of the Joseon Dynasty, from the selection of figures to the contents of the lessons with regard to the figures included. KCI Citation Count: 1