ETA Receptor Blockade and Vascular Function in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease
Endothelin-1 (ET1) is a potent vasoconstrictor, mitogen, proinflammatory mediator, and a mediator of nociception, whose synthesis is increased by hypoxia, ischemia, shear stress, oxidative stress and reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, all of which are well documented mechanisms in the pathop...
Saved in:
| Published in | Blood Vol. 136; no. Supplement 1; pp. 25 - 26 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Elsevier Inc
05.11.2020
|
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0006-4971 1528-0020 |
| DOI | 10.1182/blood-2020-142477 |
Cover
| Abstract | Endothelin-1 (ET1) is a potent vasoconstrictor, mitogen, proinflammatory mediator, and a mediator of nociception, whose synthesis is increased by hypoxia, ischemia, shear stress, oxidative stress and reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, all of which are well documented mechanisms in the pathophysiology of sickle cell disease (SCD). We earlier reported on our studies on the role of ET-1 in SCD, and in transgenic mouse models showed that ETA receptor blockade with ambrisentan provides renal protection by preventing the development of glomerular hyperfiltration and proteinuria (Kasztan et al, 2017, Taylor et al, 2019, Kasztan and Pollock, 2019). ETA receptor blockade was also shown to decrease pulmonary inflammation in response to hypoxia/reoxygenation and LPS (Meiler et al.). Additionally, Lutz et al (2018) showed that pharmacologic inhibition or neuron specific knockdown of ETA receptor in primary sensory neurons of dorsal root ganglia in Berk mice alleviated basal and post-hypoxia evoked pain sensitivity. More recently (Kutlar et al, Blood 2019, 617,130036) we reported the preliminary results of a placebo controlled, double-blind phase I trial of ambrisentan in 26 subjects with SCD (SS and S-ß0 thalassemia) and microalbuminuria, and showed that the drug was well tolerated without any dose limiting toxicities and patients on ambrisentan had a reduction in microalbuminuria, especially in the subgroup who had been on concomitant ACEi/ARB therapy at a stable dose for at least six months (n=6, 286.1 mg/g Cr at baseline to 197.7 mg/g on day 85, p=0.06). FMD measurements showed increased arterial diameter, and improved microvascular function.
We analyzed data collected on secondary end points during the phase I study, including Tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity (TRV), Transcranial Doppler (TCD) velocities in distal internal carotid (dICA) and middle cerebral (MCA) arteries, and eGFR (calculated with CKD-Epi formula). Fig. 1a shows eGFRs in ambrisentan and placebo groups; Fig. 1b and Fig. 1c show a breakdown of ambrisentan and placebo groups based on concomitant ACEi/ARB usage. There is a reduction in glomerular hyperfiltration in the ambrisentan group compared to placebo, more pronounced in the subgroup who have not been on ACEi/ARBs. Fig. 1d depicts the change in flow velocity in MCA (TAMMV, Time Averaged Mean Maximal Velocity, cm/sec) between the ambrisentan and placebo groups; similarly, Fig. 1e and 1f show the breakdown of baseline and Day 85 TAMMVs in MCA according to ACEi/ARB usage. A similar trend is also observed in dICA flow (fig. 1g-1i), and suggests a synergistic effect of ETA receptor blockade with ACEi/ARBs in preventing an increase in blood flow velocities. TRV was available on 7 subjects, 6 of which were in the ambrisentan group. Fig. 1j shows the change in TRV in the ambrisentan group, and again is suggestive of a synergistic effect of ambrisentan and ACEi/ARBs in decreasing TRV. These data are clearly very preliminary, and are obtained on a small number of subjects, and as such, do not warrant any conclusions and or speculations. Nevertheless, an interesting observation is the apparent interaction of ETA receptor blockade and ACEi/ARBs in altering vascular flow/function in SCD patients. Decrease in microalbuminuria has been reported with ACEi and ARBs in SCD (Yee et al, 2018), without any effect on GFR. A reduction in hyperfiltration would likely have a significant renoprotective effect, at an earlier stage in the development of sickle nephropathy. ETA receptor antagonists are approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension; thus, a decrease in TRV would have a beneficial effect. Increase in blood flow velocity in major intracranial vessels is a well established risk factor for ischemic stroke in children with SCD; however, much less is known in adults. In summary, the effect of ETA receptor blockade with or without ACEi/ARB, may have a significant effect on vascular function/blood flow in different organ systems, and should be explored in a large, multi-center phase II trial, with and without concomitant and or serial ACEi/ARBs, for a longer period of time, with a dose escalation, to further clarify the pleiotropic effects on multiple aspects of SCD pathology.
[Display omitted]
Kutlar:NIH/NHLBI (SCDIC): Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Micelle Biopharma: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; REACH: Other: DSMB Member; NOHARM: Other: DSMB Member; Bluebird Bio: Other: DSMB Member. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Endothelin-1 (ET1) is a potent vasoconstrictor, mitogen, proinflammatory mediator, and a mediator of nociception, whose synthesis is increased by hypoxia, ischemia, shear stress, oxidative stress and reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, all of which are well documented mechanisms in the pathophysiology of sickle cell disease (SCD). We earlier reported on our studies on the role of ET-1 in SCD, and in transgenic mouse models showed that ETA receptor blockade with ambrisentan provides renal protection by preventing the development of glomerular hyperfiltration and proteinuria (Kasztan et al, 2017, Taylor et al, 2019, Kasztan and Pollock, 2019). ETA receptor blockade was also shown to decrease pulmonary inflammation in response to hypoxia/reoxygenation and LPS (Meiler et al.). Additionally, Lutz et al (2018) showed that pharmacologic inhibition or neuron specific knockdown of ETA receptor in primary sensory neurons of dorsal root ganglia in Berk mice alleviated basal and post-hypoxia evoked pain sensitivity. More recently (Kutlar et al, Blood 2019, 617,130036) we reported the preliminary results of a placebo controlled, double-blind phase I trial of ambrisentan in 26 subjects with SCD (SS and S-ß0 thalassemia) and microalbuminuria, and showed that the drug was well tolerated without any dose limiting toxicities and patients on ambrisentan had a reduction in microalbuminuria, especially in the subgroup who had been on concomitant ACEi/ARB therapy at a stable dose for at least six months (n=6, 286.1 mg/g Cr at baseline to 197.7 mg/g on day 85, p=0.06). FMD measurements showed increased arterial diameter, and improved microvascular function.
We analyzed data collected on secondary end points during the phase I study, including Tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity (TRV), Transcranial Doppler (TCD) velocities in distal internal carotid (dICA) and middle cerebral (MCA) arteries, and eGFR (calculated with CKD-Epi formula). Fig. 1a shows eGFRs in ambrisentan and placebo groups; Fig. 1b and Fig. 1c show a breakdown of ambrisentan and placebo groups based on concomitant ACEi/ARB usage. There is a reduction in glomerular hyperfiltration in the ambrisentan group compared to placebo, more pronounced in the subgroup who have not been on ACEi/ARBs. Fig. 1d depicts the change in flow velocity in MCA (TAMMV, Time Averaged Mean Maximal Velocity, cm/sec) between the ambrisentan and placebo groups; similarly, Fig. 1e and 1f show the breakdown of baseline and Day 85 TAMMVs in MCA according to ACEi/ARB usage. A similar trend is also observed in dICA flow (fig. 1g-1i), and suggests a synergistic effect of ETA receptor blockade with ACEi/ARBs in preventing an increase in blood flow velocities. TRV was available on 7 subjects, 6 of which were in the ambrisentan group. Fig. 1j shows the change in TRV in the ambrisentan group, and again is suggestive of a synergistic effect of ambrisentan and ACEi/ARBs in decreasing TRV. These data are clearly very preliminary, and are obtained on a small number of subjects, and as such, do not warrant any conclusions and or speculations. Nevertheless, an interesting observation is the apparent interaction of ETA receptor blockade and ACEi/ARBs in altering vascular flow/function in SCD patients. Decrease in microalbuminuria has been reported with ACEi and ARBs in SCD (Yee et al, 2018), without any effect on GFR. A reduction in hyperfiltration would likely have a significant renoprotective effect, at an earlier stage in the development of sickle nephropathy. ETA receptor antagonists are approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension; thus, a decrease in TRV would have a beneficial effect. Increase in blood flow velocity in major intracranial vessels is a well established risk factor for ischemic stroke in children with SCD; however, much less is known in adults. In summary, the effect of ETA receptor blockade with or without ACEi/ARB, may have a significant effect on vascular function/blood flow in different organ systems, and should be explored in a large, multi-center phase II trial, with and without concomitant and or serial ACEi/ARBs, for a longer period of time, with a dose escalation, to further clarify the pleiotropic effects on multiple aspects of SCD pathology.
[Display omitted]
Kutlar:NIH/NHLBI (SCDIC): Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Micelle Biopharma: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; REACH: Other: DSMB Member; NOHARM: Other: DSMB Member; Bluebird Bio: Other: DSMB Member. Endothelin-1 (ET1) is a potent vasoconstrictor, mitogen, proinflammatory mediator, and a mediator of nociception, whose synthesis is increased by hypoxia, ischemia, shear stress, oxidative stress and reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, all of which are well documented mechanisms in the pathophysiology of sickle cell disease (SCD). We earlier reported on our studies on the role of ET-1 in SCD, and in transgenic mouse models showed that ETA receptor blockade with ambrisentan provides renal protection by preventing the development of glomerular hyperfiltration and proteinuria (Kasztan et al, 2017, Taylor et al, 2019, Kasztan and Pollock, 2019). ETA receptor blockade was also shown to decrease pulmonary inflammation in response to hypoxia/reoxygenation and LPS (Meiler et al.). Additionally, Lutz et al (2018) showed that pharmacologic inhibition or neuron specific knockdown of ETA receptor in primary sensory neurons of dorsal root ganglia in Berk mice alleviated basal and post-hypoxia evoked pain sensitivity. More recently (Kutlar et al, Blood 2019, 617,130036) we reported the preliminary results of a placebo controlled, double-blind phase I trial of ambrisentan in 26 subjects with SCD (SS and S-ß0 thalassemia) and microalbuminuria, and showed that the drug was well tolerated without any dose limiting toxicities and patients on ambrisentan had a reduction in microalbuminuria, especially in the subgroup who had been on concomitant ACEi/ARB therapy at a stable dose for at least six months (n=6, 286.1 mg/g Cr at baseline to 197.7 mg/g on day 85, p=0.06). FMD measurements showed increased arterial diameter, and improved microvascular function. We analyzed data collected on secondary end points during the phase I study, including Tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity (TRV), Transcranial Doppler (TCD) velocities in distal internal carotid (dICA) and middle cerebral (MCA) arteries, and eGFR (calculated with CKD-Epi formula). Fig. 1a shows eGFRs in ambrisentan and placebo groups; Fig. 1b and Fig. 1c show a breakdown of ambrisentan and placebo groups based on concomitant ACEi/ARB usage. There is a reduction in glomerular hyperfiltration in the ambrisentan group compared to placebo, more pronounced in the subgroup who have not been on ACEi/ARBs. Fig. 1d depicts the change in flow velocity in MCA (TAMMV, Time Averaged Mean Maximal Velocity, cm/sec) between the ambrisentan and placebo groups; similarly, Fig. 1e and 1f show the breakdown of baseline and Day 85 TAMMVs in MCA according to ACEi/ARB usage. A similar trend is also observed in dICA flow (fig. 1g-1i), and suggests a synergistic effect of ETA receptor blockade with ACEi/ARBs in preventing an increase in blood flow velocities. TRV was available on 7 subjects, 6 of which were in the ambrisentan group. Fig. 1j shows the change in TRV in the ambrisentan group, and again is suggestive of a synergistic effect of ambrisentan and ACEi/ARBs in decreasing TRV. These data are clearly very preliminary, and are obtained on a small number of subjects, and as such, do not warrant any conclusions and or speculations. Nevertheless, an interesting observation is the apparent interaction of ETA receptor blockade and ACEi/ARBs in altering vascular flow/function in SCD patients. Decrease in microalbuminuria has been reported with ACEi and ARBs in SCD (Yee et al, 2018), without any effect on GFR. A reduction in hyperfiltration would likely have a significant renoprotective effect, at an earlier stage in the development of sickle nephropathy. ETA receptor antagonists are approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension; thus, a decrease in TRV would have a beneficial effect. Increase in blood flow velocity in major intracranial vessels is a well established risk factor for ischemic stroke in children with SCD; however, much less is known in adults. In summary, the effect of ETA receptor blockade with or without ACEi/ARB, may have a significant effect on vascular function/blood flow in different organ systems, and should be explored in a large, multi-center phase II trial, with and without concomitant and or serial ACEi/ARBs, for a longer period of time, with a dose escalation, to further clarify the pleiotropic effects on multiple aspects of SCD pathology. Figure 1 |
| Author | Pollock, David M. Xu, Hongyan Kutlar, Abdullah Bowman, Latanya Harris, Ryan Patel, Niren Adamkiewicz, Daniel Wells, Leigh Pollock, Jennifer Meiler, Steffen E. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Daniel surname: Adamkiewicz fullname: Adamkiewicz, Daniel organization: Center for Blood Disorders, Augusta University/Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA – sequence: 2 givenname: Hongyan surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Hongyan organization: Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Population Science, Augusta University/Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA – sequence: 3 givenname: Latanya surname: Bowman fullname: Bowman, Latanya organization: Center for Blood Disorders, Augusta University/Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA – sequence: 4 givenname: Leigh surname: Wells fullname: Wells, Leigh organization: Center for Blood Disorders, Augusta University/Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA – sequence: 5 givenname: Niren surname: Patel fullname: Patel, Niren organization: Center for Blood Disorders, Augusta University/Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA – sequence: 6 givenname: Ryan surname: Harris fullname: Harris, Ryan organization: Georgia Prevention Institute, Augusta University/Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA – sequence: 7 givenname: Jennifer surname: Pollock fullname: Pollock, Jennifer organization: Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL – sequence: 8 givenname: David M. surname: Pollock fullname: Pollock, David M. organization: Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL – sequence: 9 givenname: Steffen E. surname: Meiler fullname: Meiler, Steffen E. organization: Dept. of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Augusta University/Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA – sequence: 10 givenname: Abdullah surname: Kutlar fullname: Kutlar, Abdullah organization: Center for Blood Disorders, Augusta University/Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA |
| BookMark | eNp9kN1Kw0AQhRepYFt9AO_2BaIz-WkSvKq1VaFg0eDtsj-zuDZmy26q-Pam1muvBg58hzPfhI063xFjlwhXiFV6rVrvTZJCCgnmaV6WJ2yMRVolMEQjNgaAWZLXJZ6xSYzvAJhnaTFmm2Uz58-kadf7wG9br7fSEJed4a8y6n0rA1_tO90733HX8Y3sHXV95F-uf-MvTm9b4gtqW37nIslI5-zUyjbSxd-dsma1bBYPyfrp_nExXye6zsskQ4NU6VmtjM1NaiutyyKbGSBZKbRoFenCVjVAbZSqpVFgpLTKKpkjQplNGR5rdfAxBrJiF9yHDN8CQRyMiF8j4mBEHI0MzM2RoWHXp6Mgoh6e0WRcIN0L490_9A-a5WwN |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2020 American Society of Hematology |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 American Society of Hematology |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
| DOI | 10.1182/blood-2020-142477 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Chemistry Biology Anatomy & Physiology |
| EISSN | 1528-0020 |
| EndPage | 26 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_1182_blood_2020_142477 S0006497118709282 |
| GroupedDBID | --- -~X .55 1CY 23N 2WC 34G 39C 4.4 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 AAEDW AAXUO ABOCM ABVKL ACGFO ADBBV AENEX AFOSN AHPSJ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ BAWUL BTFSW CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD EX3 F5P FDB FRP GS5 GX1 IH2 K-O KQ8 L7B LSO MJL N9A OK1 P2P R.V RHF RHI ROL SJN THE TR2 TWZ W2D W8F WH7 WOQ WOW X7M YHG YKV ZA5 0R~ AALRI AAYXX ACVFH ADCNI ADVLN AEUPX AFPUW AIGII AITUG AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP CITATION EFKBS H13 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c947-31d1e8c69bdf4d2f8cc7536d0ea8b1f1fbec5f89009dbb9adb0daafbfba411073 |
| ISSN | 0006-4971 |
| IngestDate | Wed Oct 01 00:31:54 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:43:48 EST 2024 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | Supplement 1 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c947-31d1e8c69bdf4d2f8cc7536d0ea8b1f1fbec5f89009dbb9adb0daafbfba411073 |
| PageCount | 2 |
| ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2020_142477 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1182_blood_2020_142477 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2020-11-05 2020-11-5 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-11-05 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2020 text: 2020-11-05 day: 05 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationTitle | Blood |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
| SSID | ssj0014325 |
| Score | 2.344452 |
| Snippet | Endothelin-1 (ET1) is a potent vasoconstrictor, mitogen, proinflammatory mediator, and a mediator of nociception, whose synthesis is increased by hypoxia,... |
| SourceID | crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 25 |
| Title | ETA Receptor Blockade and Vascular Function in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease |
| URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-142477 |
| Volume | 136 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1528-0020 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0014325 issn: 0006-4971 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 19460101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVBFR databaseName: Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1528-0020 dateEnd: 20241105 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0014325 issn: 0006-4971 databaseCode: DIK dateStart: 19460101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com providerName: Flying Publisher – providerCode: PRVFQY databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1528-0020 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0014325 issn: 0006-4971 databaseCode: GX1 dateStart: 0 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research – providerCode: PRVLSH databaseName: Elsevier Journals customDbUrl: mediaType: online eissn: 1528-0020 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0014325 issn: 0006-4971 databaseCode: AKRWK dateStart: 19460101 isFulltext: true providerName: Library Specific Holdings |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bS9xAFB5aS6svUteK2lbmofShkjaX2TXz6G4VaatY3JZ9C3OVRU1EVmT99Z4zF7OLCq0vIUxIZpjz5cy5H0I-MQFicKlkYjj8TSxlJuEwkJgdLVIFT7UzZR8e9Q7-sB-j7qhNIXDZJRP5Vd0-mlfyHKrCGNAVs2T_g7L3H4UBuAf6whUoDNd_ovHeEKPZMDCludruw7F0JrR3B_yNAab7cG7FeMZjX0M1JLSdjNGruz1A4933GTdN9PCehzby3psvLs7G5masbtu89PhwdO3Or6Y-nbZQ6zc3Ma1BgPw5bbk_zOew8wuNsrNGB9Aw0ZDabS1hMRtmLlgTjz7sWOexYgJDxQrYaZ7Ocdxijmd2Z05fnz7_kK-XWCfWx_L79bCchf4v8-WyT5yUBYvIgBNxUChfklc5cHxs6_Hzd-thYkXuu1uENQePN0z07cE0j8ssM3LI8C1ZDgoE3fVoWCEvTN0hq7u1mDQXU_qZupBe5yvpkNf9eLc4iI39OuTNYYinWCXHgCAaEUQjgiggiEYE0YggOq5pRBBFBFGPIIoIogFB78hwf284OEhCj41EcYYWap2ZUvW41Jbp3JZKgf7a06kRpcxsZuEX79qSgySupeRCy1QLYaWVgqHloFgjC3VTm3VCC6ulBuFQs6JgXCmOBS52QHrPjMh7wm6QL3ETq0tfSaVyGmiZV27HK9zxyu_4BmFxm6sgCnoRrwJEPP3a5vNee0-WWpB_IAuTq2vzEWTNidxyoLkDp5984Q |
| linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ETA+Receptor+Blockade+and+Vascular+Function+in+Patients+with+Sickle+Cell+Disease&rft.jtitle=Blood&rft.au=Adamkiewicz%2C+Daniel&rft.au=Xu%2C+Hongyan&rft.au=Bowman%2C+Latanya&rft.au=Wells%2C+Leigh&rft.date=2020-11-05&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0006-4971&rft.eissn=1528-0020&rft.volume=136&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=26&rft_id=info:doi/10.1182%2Fblood-2020-142477&rft.externalDocID=S0006497118709282 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0006-4971&client=summon |