Enhanced detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in targeted and non-targeted regions using BiopSee® MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy

This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of clinical and experimental urology Vol. 13; no. 4; pp. 265 - 271
Main Author Nakahara, Ken
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2330-1910
2330-1910
DOI10.62347/QODA6396

Cover

Abstract This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in regions of interest (ROI) and non-ROI areas. We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients who underwent fusion biopsy between February and November 2024. Detection rates of csPCa (grade group ≥ 2) were compared between the ROI and non-ROI regions, and clinical and biopsy characteristics were compared between patients with and without csPCa. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of csPCa. The median patient age was 74 years, with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.93 ng/mL. The csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in the ROI than in the non-ROI regions (61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012). Across the cohort, PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were more common than PI-RADS 3 lesions. A higher PI-RADS score (4 or 5) was identified as a significant predictor of csPCa detection (odds ratio 5.14, P = 0.034), whereas age, PSA, number of ROIs, and biopsy core numbers were not significant predictors. Fusion biopsy using the BiopSee system achieved a high csPCa detection rate in targeted ROIs, especially for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, while also highlighting the importance of combining systematic biopsy with targeted approaches because of the substantial proportion of csPCa detected in non-ROI regions.
AbstractList This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in regions of interest (ROI) and non-ROI areas. We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients who underwent fusion biopsy between February and November 2024. Detection rates of csPCa (grade group ≥ 2) were compared between the ROI and non-ROI regions, and clinical and biopsy characteristics were compared between patients with and without csPCa. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of csPCa. The median patient age was 74 years, with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.93 ng/mL. The csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in the ROI than in the non-ROI regions (61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012). Across the cohort, PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were more common than PI-RADS 3 lesions. A higher PI-RADS score (4 or 5) was identified as a significant predictor of csPCa detection (odds ratio 5.14, P = 0.034), whereas age, PSA, number of ROIs, and biopsy core numbers were not significant predictors. Fusion biopsy using the BiopSee system achieved a high csPCa detection rate in targeted ROIs, especially for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, while also highlighting the importance of combining systematic biopsy with targeted approaches because of the substantial proportion of csPCa detected in non-ROI regions.
This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee® system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in regions of interest (ROI) and non-ROI areas.OBJECTIVESThis study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee® system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in regions of interest (ROI) and non-ROI areas.We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients who underwent fusion biopsy between February and November 2024. Detection rates of csPCa (grade group ≥ 2) were compared between the ROI and non-ROI regions, and clinical and biopsy characteristics were compared between patients with and without csPCa. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of csPCa.METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed 59 patients who underwent fusion biopsy between February and November 2024. Detection rates of csPCa (grade group ≥ 2) were compared between the ROI and non-ROI regions, and clinical and biopsy characteristics were compared between patients with and without csPCa. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of csPCa.The median patient age was 74 years, with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.93 ng/mL. The csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in the ROI than in the non-ROI regions (61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012). Across the cohort, PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were more common than PI-RADS 3 lesions. A higher PI-RADS score (4 or 5) was identified as a significant predictor of csPCa detection (odds ratio 5.14, P = 0.034), whereas age, PSA, number of ROIs, and biopsy core numbers were not significant predictors.RESULTSThe median patient age was 74 years, with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.93 ng/mL. The csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in the ROI than in the non-ROI regions (61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012). Across the cohort, PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were more common than PI-RADS 3 lesions. A higher PI-RADS score (4 or 5) was identified as a significant predictor of csPCa detection (odds ratio 5.14, P = 0.034), whereas age, PSA, number of ROIs, and biopsy core numbers were not significant predictors.Fusion biopsy using the BiopSee® system achieved a high csPCa detection rate in targeted ROIs, especially for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, while also highlighting the importance of combining systematic biopsy with targeted approaches because of the substantial proportion of csPCa detected in non-ROI regions.CONCLUSIONSFusion biopsy using the BiopSee® system achieved a high csPCa detection rate in targeted ROIs, especially for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, while also highlighting the importance of combining systematic biopsy with targeted approaches because of the substantial proportion of csPCa detected in non-ROI regions.
Author Nakahara, Ken
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ken
  surname: Nakahara
  fullname: Nakahara, Ken
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40978092$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkUtOwzAQhi0EoqV0wQWQl7AI9StxsyylQKWiCug-cpxxMUqdEieLXoKjcAhOhqEPsRp75vv_sWfO0LGrHCB0QclNwriQg-f53SjhaXKEuoxzEtGUkuN_5w7qe_9OCKFcJiSVp6gjQhiSlHXR58S9KaehwAU0oBtbOVwZrEvrrFZlucHeLp014eIavK4r36gGsP7V1Ng63Kh6GZQFVq7A4WnRIVHDMrh53HrrlvjWVutXgO8v_PQyHbRlUytftUFjQj00zUPdb87RiVGlh_4u9tDifrIYP0az-cN0PJpFOiUsUlxCkiY0FnFOkzwGyoaCCGUMVQpiQUyhBRU8FpzEhEsmC2lyIjnhOVPS8B662tqGD3204JtsZb2GslQOqtZnnMWBpXwoA3q5Q9t8BUW2ru1K1ZtsP8IAXG8BHYbjazAHhJLsb0PZfkP8B0MGhDQ
Cites_doi 10.21037/tau.2017.03.77
10.1056/NEJMcp2209151
10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.067
10.4102/sajr.v25i1.2062
10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.015
10.1007/s10147-023-02404-z
10.1111/bju.13247
10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.005
10.1007/s00345-022-04230-w
10.3390/cancers15133329
10.1007/s00345-015-1525-4
10.1056/NEJMoa1910038
10.1177/1756287220916613
10.1259/bjr.20210916
10.1007/s00345-022-04086-0
10.1016/j.euo.2022.08.005
10.1007/s00345-021-03761-y
10.1001/jama.2014.17942
10.1007/s00330-022-08822-3
10.3322/caac.21660
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright AJCEU Copyright © 2025.
Copyright_xml – notice: AJCEU Copyright © 2025.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.62347/QODA6396
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2330-1910
EndPage 271
ExternalDocumentID 40978092
10_62347_QODA6396
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID AAYXX
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
CITATION
DIK
HYE
OK1
RPM
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c902-a37e6961545b16b5e128404aff1aae540fdc41435430503727d7fb07303b2a7f3
ISSN 2330-1910
IngestDate Mon Sep 22 19:30:56 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 25 01:51:36 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 05:17:05 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords prostate cancer
prostate imaging reporting and data system
Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy
magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy
Language English
License AJCEU Copyright © 2025.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c902-a37e6961545b16b5e128404aff1aae540fdc41435430503727d7fb07303b2a7f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 40978092
PQID 3253031387
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3253031387
pubmed_primary_40978092
crossref_primary_10_62347_QODA6396
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-00-00
20250101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2025
  text: 2025-00-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of clinical and experimental urology
PublicationTitleAlternate Am J Clin Exp Urol
PublicationYear 2025
References Sokolakis (ref19) 2021; 39
Gaudiano (ref6) 2022; 95
Tewes (ref9) 2015; 33
Deniffel (ref17) 2022; 32
Pinsky (ref4) 2023; 388
Sung (ref0) 2021; 71
Benelli (ref7) 2020; 12
Saner (ref16) 2023; 6
Giganti (ref8) 2017; 6
Meng (ref12) 2016; 69
Ito (ref20) 2023; 28
Paesano (ref10) 2023; 15
Mortezavi (ref15) 2018; 200
ref5
Wang (ref3) 2023; 41
Elm E (ref11) 2007; 147
JC (ref18) 2024; 86
Gayet (ref1) 2016; 117
Siddiqui (ref2) 2015; 313
Ahdoot (ref14) 2020; 382
Krausewitz (ref13) 2023; 41
References_xml – volume: 6
  start-page: 432
  year: 2017
  ident: ref8
  article-title: A critical comparison of techniques for MRI-targeted biopsy of the prostate
  publication-title: Transl Androl Urol
  doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.03.77
– volume: 388
  start-page: 1405
  year: 2023
  ident: ref4
  article-title: Screening for prostate cancer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp2209151
– volume: 147
  start-page: 573
  year: 2007
  ident: ref11
  article-title: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
– volume: 200
  start-page: 309
  year: 2018
  ident: ref15
  article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and fusion guided targeted biopsy evaluated by transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy for the detection and characterization of prostate cancer
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.067
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.4102/sajr.v25i1.2062
– volume: 86
  start-page: 61
  year: 2024
  ident: ref18
  article-title: Transperineal versus transrectal magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy to prevent infectious complications: the PREVENT randomized trial
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.015
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1545
  year: 2023
  ident: ref20
  article-title: Superior detection of significant prostate cancer by transperineal prostate biopsy using MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion image guidance over cognitive registration
  publication-title: Int J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1007/s10147-023-02404-z
– volume: 117
  start-page: 392
  year: 2016
  ident: ref1
  article-title: The value of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion biopsy platforms in prostate cancer detection: a systematic review
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/bju.13247
– volume: 69
  start-page: 512
  year: 2016
  ident: ref12
  article-title: Relationship between prebiopsy multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), biopsy indication, and MRI-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy outcomes
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.005
– volume: 41
  start-page: 19
  year: 2023
  ident: ref13
  article-title: Current role of systematic biopsy in diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in primary combined MRI-targeted biopsy: a high-volume single-center study
  publication-title: World J Urol
  doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04230-w
– volume: 15
  start-page: 3329
  year: 2023
  ident: ref10
  article-title: A systematic review of the current status of magnetic resonance-ultrasound images fusion software platforms for transperineal prostate biopsies
  publication-title: Cancers (Basel)
  doi: 10.3390/cancers15133329
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1707
  year: 2015
  ident: ref9
  article-title: Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results
  publication-title: World J Urol
  doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1525-4
– volume: 382
  start-page: 917
  year: 2020
  ident: ref14
  article-title: MRI-targeted, systematic, and combined biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910038
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1756287220916613
  year: 2020
  ident: ref7
  article-title: The role of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
  publication-title: Ther Adv Urol
  doi: 10.1177/1756287220916613
– volume: 95
  start-page: 20210916
  year: 2022
  ident: ref6
  article-title: 1 for the evaluation of transition zone lesions: a practical guide for radiologists
  publication-title: Br J Radiol
  doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210916
– volume: 41
  start-page: 653
  year: 2023
  ident: ref3
  article-title: A prospective multi-center randomized comparative trial evaluating outcomes of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided 12-core systematic biopsy, mpMRI-targeted 12-core biopsy, and artificial intelligence ultrasound of prostate (AIUSP) 6-core targeted biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis
  publication-title: World J Urol
  doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04086-0
– volume: 6
  start-page: 49
  year: 2023
  ident: ref16
  article-title: Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using targeted biopsy with four cores versus target saturation biopsy with nine cores in transperineal prostate fusion biopsy: a prospective randomized trial
  publication-title: Eur Urol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.08.005
– volume: 39
  start-page: 4101
  year: 2021
  ident: ref19
  article-title: Usability and diagnostic accuracy of different MRI/ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy systems for the detection of clinically significant and insignificant prostate cancer: a prospective cohort study
  publication-title: World J Urol
  doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03761-y
– volume: 313
  start-page: 390
  year: 2015
  ident: ref2
  article-title: Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17942
– volume: 32
  start-page: 7544
  year: 2022
  ident: ref17
  article-title: Prostate biopsy in the era of MRI-targeting: towards a judicious use of additional systematic biopsy
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08822-3
– volume: 71
  start-page: 209
  year: 2021
  ident: ref0
  article-title: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
SSID ssj0001376097
Score 2.281391
Snippet This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee...
This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 265
Title Enhanced detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in targeted and non-targeted regions using BiopSee® MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40978092
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3253031387
Volume 13
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVBFR
  databaseName: Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2330-1910
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0001376097
  issn: 2330-1910
  databaseCode: DIK
  dateStart: 20130101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com
  providerName: Flying Publisher
– providerCode: PRVAQN
  databaseName: PubMed Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2330-1910
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0001376097
  issn: 2330-1910
  databaseCode: RPM
  dateStart: 20130101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
  providerName: National Library of Medicine
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3dbtMwFICtMiS0GwTir_zJILiKwlLbTdLLshUNJIZgRdpdZSe2WnUkVZtcsJfgTXgGxJNxjh2n6bRJwE1U2WkS-Xyyj4_PDyGvooEe8mxgwoRJEQqm0lABS6Fmo0gmIpa5tNk-T-Ljr-LD2fCs1_vV8VqqK_Umu7gyruR_pAptIFeMkv0HybYPhQb4DfKFK0gYrn8l40kxdwf4ua505nU_H-x4_j1A7wz0BYLhQ08sGz2Efl6ZXlsHR-sGrm221qAoi7BtwHoN6ERTW1PC20W5OtWgjR6y1-NJ8PHLe_jm-rxayw1WZQpMjTa3QMFtm51j4vY8qJOgoo3FxJfuFBio1zs2_hO5lJhOugkfas3BsJeXTuc9kotNvdyiiYWhAD1r_T2dl-0_5tjhfEcu6uWia-lw8dBuKmQc8IGdpTvB0Ve0-bmcd5gV3YnZVaS4vGCA8ifwzPrzp6Mx6Gpx9x6Q9eqbJQdzgqWRq9l3KTu377pBbjK0CHXsRdbKhz5HtsJP-7kuvZV98YF_7T655R-0qx9ds-mxys_0Drnd7Fro2CF4l_R0cY_88PjRFj9aGrrFj3bwox4_6vCji4J62iiQQLv40QY_avGjDX70908K6B1swaMOPOrAu0-m7ybTw-Owqe8RZiNYhyVPdDyKUYdXg1gNNapKkZDGDKTUsJMweSZQncesdBEHRTtPjMIliSsmE8MfkD34Nv2I0MSkOmIwuCphQvNMsTQdmTxKhcw1N7pPXvpBna1cFpcZ7H6tEGZeCH3ywg_3DOZYPDiThS7rzYyzIcccp2nSJw-dHNrHeLk9vrbnCdlHmp3d7inZq9a1fgaabKWeW1j-AM0bpAI
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhanced+detection+of+clinically+significant+prostate+cancer+in+targeted+and+non-targeted+regions+using+BiopSee+%C2%AE+MRI%2Fultrasound+fusion+biopsy&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+clinical+and+experimental+urology&rft.au=Nakahara%2C+Ken&rft.au=Obinata%2C+Daisuke&rft.au=Hashimoto%2C+Sho&rft.au=Ohashi%2C+Kazuki&rft.date=2025&rft.issn=2330-1910&rft.eissn=2330-1910&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=265&rft_id=info:doi/10.62347%2FQODA6396&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40978092&rft.externalDocID=40978092
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2330-1910&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2330-1910&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2330-1910&client=summon