Enhanced detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in targeted and non-targeted regions using BiopSee® MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy
This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant pr...
Saved in:
| Published in | American journal of clinical and experimental urology Vol. 13; no. 4; pp. 265 - 271 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
2025
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 2330-1910 2330-1910 |
| DOI | 10.62347/QODA6396 |
Cover
| Abstract | This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee
system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in regions of interest (ROI) and non-ROI areas.
We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients who underwent fusion biopsy between February and November 2024. Detection rates of csPCa (grade group ≥ 2) were compared between the ROI and non-ROI regions, and clinical and biopsy characteristics were compared between patients with and without csPCa. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of csPCa.
The median patient age was 74 years, with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.93 ng/mL. The csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in the ROI than in the non-ROI regions (61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012). Across the cohort, PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were more common than PI-RADS 3 lesions. A higher PI-RADS score (4 or 5) was identified as a significant predictor of csPCa detection (odds ratio 5.14, P = 0.034), whereas age, PSA, number of ROIs, and biopsy core numbers were not significant predictors.
Fusion biopsy using the BiopSee
system achieved a high csPCa detection rate in targeted ROIs, especially for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, while also highlighting the importance of combining systematic biopsy with targeted approaches because of the substantial proportion of csPCa detected in non-ROI regions. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee
system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in regions of interest (ROI) and non-ROI areas.
We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients who underwent fusion biopsy between February and November 2024. Detection rates of csPCa (grade group ≥ 2) were compared between the ROI and non-ROI regions, and clinical and biopsy characteristics were compared between patients with and without csPCa. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of csPCa.
The median patient age was 74 years, with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.93 ng/mL. The csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in the ROI than in the non-ROI regions (61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012). Across the cohort, PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were more common than PI-RADS 3 lesions. A higher PI-RADS score (4 or 5) was identified as a significant predictor of csPCa detection (odds ratio 5.14, P = 0.034), whereas age, PSA, number of ROIs, and biopsy core numbers were not significant predictors.
Fusion biopsy using the BiopSee
system achieved a high csPCa detection rate in targeted ROIs, especially for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, while also highlighting the importance of combining systematic biopsy with targeted approaches because of the substantial proportion of csPCa detected in non-ROI regions. This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee® system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in regions of interest (ROI) and non-ROI areas.OBJECTIVESThis study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee® system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in regions of interest (ROI) and non-ROI areas.We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients who underwent fusion biopsy between February and November 2024. Detection rates of csPCa (grade group ≥ 2) were compared between the ROI and non-ROI regions, and clinical and biopsy characteristics were compared between patients with and without csPCa. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of csPCa.METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed 59 patients who underwent fusion biopsy between February and November 2024. Detection rates of csPCa (grade group ≥ 2) were compared between the ROI and non-ROI regions, and clinical and biopsy characteristics were compared between patients with and without csPCa. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of csPCa.The median patient age was 74 years, with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.93 ng/mL. The csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in the ROI than in the non-ROI regions (61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012). Across the cohort, PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were more common than PI-RADS 3 lesions. A higher PI-RADS score (4 or 5) was identified as a significant predictor of csPCa detection (odds ratio 5.14, P = 0.034), whereas age, PSA, number of ROIs, and biopsy core numbers were not significant predictors.RESULTSThe median patient age was 74 years, with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.93 ng/mL. The csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in the ROI than in the non-ROI regions (61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012). Across the cohort, PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were more common than PI-RADS 3 lesions. A higher PI-RADS score (4 or 5) was identified as a significant predictor of csPCa detection (odds ratio 5.14, P = 0.034), whereas age, PSA, number of ROIs, and biopsy core numbers were not significant predictors.Fusion biopsy using the BiopSee® system achieved a high csPCa detection rate in targeted ROIs, especially for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, while also highlighting the importance of combining systematic biopsy with targeted approaches because of the substantial proportion of csPCa detected in non-ROI regions.CONCLUSIONSFusion biopsy using the BiopSee® system achieved a high csPCa detection rate in targeted ROIs, especially for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, while also highlighting the importance of combining systematic biopsy with targeted approaches because of the substantial proportion of csPCa detected in non-ROI regions. |
| Author | Nakahara, Ken |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ken surname: Nakahara fullname: Nakahara, Ken |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40978092$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNkUtOwzAQhi0EoqV0wQWQl7AI9StxsyylQKWiCug-cpxxMUqdEieLXoKjcAhOhqEPsRp75vv_sWfO0LGrHCB0QclNwriQg-f53SjhaXKEuoxzEtGUkuN_5w7qe_9OCKFcJiSVp6gjQhiSlHXR58S9KaehwAU0oBtbOVwZrEvrrFZlucHeLp014eIavK4r36gGsP7V1Ng63Kh6GZQFVq7A4WnRIVHDMrh53HrrlvjWVutXgO8v_PQyHbRlUytftUFjQj00zUPdb87RiVGlh_4u9tDifrIYP0az-cN0PJpFOiUsUlxCkiY0FnFOkzwGyoaCCGUMVQpiQUyhBRU8FpzEhEsmC2lyIjnhOVPS8B662tqGD3204JtsZb2GslQOqtZnnMWBpXwoA3q5Q9t8BUW2ru1K1ZtsP8IAXG8BHYbjazAHhJLsb0PZfkP8B0MGhDQ |
| Cites_doi | 10.21037/tau.2017.03.77 10.1056/NEJMcp2209151 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.067 10.4102/sajr.v25i1.2062 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.015 10.1007/s10147-023-02404-z 10.1111/bju.13247 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.005 10.1007/s00345-022-04230-w 10.3390/cancers15133329 10.1007/s00345-015-1525-4 10.1056/NEJMoa1910038 10.1177/1756287220916613 10.1259/bjr.20210916 10.1007/s00345-022-04086-0 10.1016/j.euo.2022.08.005 10.1007/s00345-021-03761-y 10.1001/jama.2014.17942 10.1007/s00330-022-08822-3 10.3322/caac.21660 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | AJCEU Copyright © 2025. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: AJCEU Copyright © 2025. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.62347/QODA6396 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| EISSN | 2330-1910 |
| EndPage | 271 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 40978092 10_62347_QODA6396 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | AAYXX ADBBV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL CITATION DIK HYE OK1 RPM NPM 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c902-a37e6961545b16b5e128404aff1aae540fdc41435430503727d7fb07303b2a7f3 |
| ISSN | 2330-1910 |
| IngestDate | Mon Sep 22 19:30:56 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 25 01:51:36 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 05:17:05 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | false |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Keywords | prostate cancer prostate imaging reporting and data system Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy |
| Language | English |
| License | AJCEU Copyright © 2025. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c902-a37e6961545b16b5e128404aff1aae540fdc41435430503727d7fb07303b2a7f3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 40978092 |
| PQID | 3253031387 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 7 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3253031387 pubmed_primary_40978092 crossref_primary_10_62347_QODA6396 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2025-00-00 20250101 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-01-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2025 text: 2025-00-00 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | American journal of clinical and experimental urology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Am J Clin Exp Urol |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| References | Sokolakis (ref19) 2021; 39 Gaudiano (ref6) 2022; 95 Tewes (ref9) 2015; 33 Deniffel (ref17) 2022; 32 Pinsky (ref4) 2023; 388 Sung (ref0) 2021; 71 Benelli (ref7) 2020; 12 Saner (ref16) 2023; 6 Giganti (ref8) 2017; 6 Meng (ref12) 2016; 69 Ito (ref20) 2023; 28 Paesano (ref10) 2023; 15 Mortezavi (ref15) 2018; 200 ref5 Wang (ref3) 2023; 41 Elm E (ref11) 2007; 147 JC (ref18) 2024; 86 Gayet (ref1) 2016; 117 Siddiqui (ref2) 2015; 313 Ahdoot (ref14) 2020; 382 Krausewitz (ref13) 2023; 41 |
| References_xml | – volume: 6 start-page: 432 year: 2017 ident: ref8 article-title: A critical comparison of techniques for MRI-targeted biopsy of the prostate publication-title: Transl Androl Urol doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.03.77 – volume: 388 start-page: 1405 year: 2023 ident: ref4 article-title: Screening for prostate cancer publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp2209151 – volume: 147 start-page: 573 year: 2007 ident: ref11 article-title: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010 – volume: 200 start-page: 309 year: 2018 ident: ref15 article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and fusion guided targeted biopsy evaluated by transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy for the detection and characterization of prostate cancer publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.067 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.4102/sajr.v25i1.2062 – volume: 86 start-page: 61 year: 2024 ident: ref18 article-title: Transperineal versus transrectal magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy to prevent infectious complications: the PREVENT randomized trial publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.015 – volume: 28 start-page: 1545 year: 2023 ident: ref20 article-title: Superior detection of significant prostate cancer by transperineal prostate biopsy using MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion image guidance over cognitive registration publication-title: Int J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1007/s10147-023-02404-z – volume: 117 start-page: 392 year: 2016 ident: ref1 article-title: The value of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion biopsy platforms in prostate cancer detection: a systematic review publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.13247 – volume: 69 start-page: 512 year: 2016 ident: ref12 article-title: Relationship between prebiopsy multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), biopsy indication, and MRI-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy outcomes publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.005 – volume: 41 start-page: 19 year: 2023 ident: ref13 article-title: Current role of systematic biopsy in diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in primary combined MRI-targeted biopsy: a high-volume single-center study publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04230-w – volume: 15 start-page: 3329 year: 2023 ident: ref10 article-title: A systematic review of the current status of magnetic resonance-ultrasound images fusion software platforms for transperineal prostate biopsies publication-title: Cancers (Basel) doi: 10.3390/cancers15133329 – volume: 33 start-page: 1707 year: 2015 ident: ref9 article-title: Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1525-4 – volume: 382 start-page: 917 year: 2020 ident: ref14 article-title: MRI-targeted, systematic, and combined biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910038 – volume: 12 start-page: 1756287220916613 year: 2020 ident: ref7 article-title: The role of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer publication-title: Ther Adv Urol doi: 10.1177/1756287220916613 – volume: 95 start-page: 20210916 year: 2022 ident: ref6 article-title: 1 for the evaluation of transition zone lesions: a practical guide for radiologists publication-title: Br J Radiol doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210916 – volume: 41 start-page: 653 year: 2023 ident: ref3 article-title: A prospective multi-center randomized comparative trial evaluating outcomes of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided 12-core systematic biopsy, mpMRI-targeted 12-core biopsy, and artificial intelligence ultrasound of prostate (AIUSP) 6-core targeted biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04086-0 – volume: 6 start-page: 49 year: 2023 ident: ref16 article-title: Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using targeted biopsy with four cores versus target saturation biopsy with nine cores in transperineal prostate fusion biopsy: a prospective randomized trial publication-title: Eur Urol Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.08.005 – volume: 39 start-page: 4101 year: 2021 ident: ref19 article-title: Usability and diagnostic accuracy of different MRI/ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy systems for the detection of clinically significant and insignificant prostate cancer: a prospective cohort study publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03761-y – volume: 313 start-page: 390 year: 2015 ident: ref2 article-title: Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17942 – volume: 32 start-page: 7544 year: 2022 ident: ref17 article-title: Prostate biopsy in the era of MRI-targeting: towards a judicious use of additional systematic biopsy publication-title: Eur Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08822-3 – volume: 71 start-page: 209 year: 2021 ident: ref0 article-title: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 |
| SSID | ssj0001376097 |
| Score | 2.281391 |
| Snippet | This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee... This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 265 |
| Title | Enhanced detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in targeted and non-targeted regions using BiopSee® MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40978092 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3253031387 |
| Volume | 13 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVBFR databaseName: Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2330-1910 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001376097 issn: 2330-1910 databaseCode: DIK dateStart: 20130101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com providerName: Flying Publisher – providerCode: PRVAQN databaseName: PubMed Central customDbUrl: eissn: 2330-1910 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001376097 issn: 2330-1910 databaseCode: RPM dateStart: 20130101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ providerName: National Library of Medicine |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3dbtMwFICtMiS0GwTir_zJILiKwlLbTdLLshUNJIZgRdpdZSe2WnUkVZtcsJfgTXgGxJNxjh2n6bRJwE1U2WkS-Xyyj4_PDyGvooEe8mxgwoRJEQqm0lABS6Fmo0gmIpa5tNk-T-Ljr-LD2fCs1_vV8VqqK_Umu7gyruR_pAptIFeMkv0HybYPhQb4DfKFK0gYrn8l40kxdwf4ua505nU_H-x4_j1A7wz0BYLhQ08sGz2Efl6ZXlsHR-sGrm221qAoi7BtwHoN6ERTW1PC20W5OtWgjR6y1-NJ8PHLe_jm-rxayw1WZQpMjTa3QMFtm51j4vY8qJOgoo3FxJfuFBio1zs2_hO5lJhOugkfas3BsJeXTuc9kotNvdyiiYWhAD1r_T2dl-0_5tjhfEcu6uWia-lw8dBuKmQc8IGdpTvB0Ve0-bmcd5gV3YnZVaS4vGCA8ifwzPrzp6Mx6Gpx9x6Q9eqbJQdzgqWRq9l3KTu377pBbjK0CHXsRdbKhz5HtsJP-7kuvZV98YF_7T655R-0qx9ds-mxys_0Drnd7Fro2CF4l_R0cY_88PjRFj9aGrrFj3bwox4_6vCji4J62iiQQLv40QY_avGjDX70908K6B1swaMOPOrAu0-m7ybTw-Owqe8RZiNYhyVPdDyKUYdXg1gNNapKkZDGDKTUsJMweSZQncesdBEHRTtPjMIliSsmE8MfkD34Nv2I0MSkOmIwuCphQvNMsTQdmTxKhcw1N7pPXvpBna1cFpcZ7H6tEGZeCH3ywg_3DOZYPDiThS7rzYyzIcccp2nSJw-dHNrHeLk9vrbnCdlHmp3d7inZq9a1fgaabKWeW1j-AM0bpAI |
| linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhanced+detection+of+clinically+significant+prostate+cancer+in+targeted+and+non-targeted+regions+using+BiopSee+%C2%AE+MRI%2Fultrasound+fusion+biopsy&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+clinical+and+experimental+urology&rft.au=Nakahara%2C+Ken&rft.au=Obinata%2C+Daisuke&rft.au=Hashimoto%2C+Sho&rft.au=Ohashi%2C+Kazuki&rft.date=2025&rft.issn=2330-1910&rft.eissn=2330-1910&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=265&rft_id=info:doi/10.62347%2FQODA6396&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40978092&rft.externalDocID=40978092 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2330-1910&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2330-1910&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2330-1910&client=summon |