科学数据出版模式比较研究

根据科学数据产生情形,将出版模式口归纳为科学数据集成出版与独立出版两种模式,并从数据集描述方式、质量审核方式与出版费用三个方面对口51纳的出版模式进行了比较分析。通过对不同出版模式下的典型案例的分析,总结出如下结论:数据集描述方式和对象与出版模式中涉及的出版主体有关;独立出版模式的质量审核更为完善;不同出版模式,其付费标准和费用承担主体不同。对当前科学数据出版模式的比较研究,可为国内科学数据出版实践发展提供借鉴。...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in大学图书馆学报 Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 34 - 40
Main Author 黄国彬;王舒;屈亚杰
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 北京大学 01.02.2018
北京师范大学政府管理学院,北京,100875
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1002-1027
DOI10.16603/j.issn-1002-1027.2018.01.005

Cover

More Information
Summary:根据科学数据产生情形,将出版模式口归纳为科学数据集成出版与独立出版两种模式,并从数据集描述方式、质量审核方式与出版费用三个方面对口51纳的出版模式进行了比较分析。通过对不同出版模式下的典型案例的分析,总结出如下结论:数据集描述方式和对象与出版模式中涉及的出版主体有关;独立出版模式的质量审核更为完善;不同出版模式,其付费标准和费用承担主体不同。对当前科学数据出版模式的比较研究,可为国内科学数据出版实践发展提供借鉴。
Bibliography:Huang Guobin, Wang Shu, Qu Yajie
11-2952/G2
Scientific Data ; Publication Model; Integration Publication; Independent Publication
In the domestic, scientific data publication is in the initial stage. In order to provide reference for the practice of domestic scientific data publication, this paper made a comparative study of the current scientific data publication models. It summed up the scientific data integration publication model and inde- pendent publication model and each publication model was analyzed with reference of typical cases. And then, it compared and analyzed the different publication models from three aspects including data set de- scription, quality audit methods and publication costs. Finally, several conclusions are drawn as following: the methods and objects of data set description is related to the publishing subject involved in the publica- tion model; the quality audit of the independent publication model is more perfect.
ISSN:1002-1027
DOI:10.16603/j.issn-1002-1027.2018.01.005