Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience
The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to determine the safety and efficacy of CAS in real-world settings. We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent CAS from 2006 to 2013. Peripro...
Saved in:
Published in | Neurologia medico-chirurgica Vol. 60; no. 3; pp. 121 - 125 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Japan
The Japan Neurosurgical Society
2020
THE JAPAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY Japan Science and Technology Agency |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0470-8105 1349-8029 1349-8029 |
DOI | 10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0192 |
Cover
Abstract | The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to determine the safety and efficacy of CAS in real-world settings. We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent CAS from 2006 to 2013. Periprocedural results were compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of ipsilateral stroke, death, and carotid artery restenosis beyond 30 days and within 5 years after the first procedure. The average age was 72.2 years with a majority of male subjects (84.9%). Twenty-seven patients (37%) were asymptomatic. Incidence of periprocedural adverse events and mRS ≤2 at 30 days after CAS were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.14 and 0.07, respectively). CAS was unsuccessful in three patients and one post-procedural minor stroke occurred. Therefore, 69 patients were included in the long-term study. The rate of occurrence of the primary endpoint was 21.7%. Ipsilateral ischemic stroke occurred in one patient, which was due to cardiogenic embolus. Nine patients died, and cancer was the most frequent cause. Five in-stent restenoses were observed. All patients with restenosis underwent additional CAS without any occurrence of stroke. This study revealed the safety and long-term efficacy of CAS in a real-world setting. Routine follow-up is also important for detecting carotid artery restenosis. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to determine the safety and efficacy of CAS in real-world settings. We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent CAS from 2006 to 2013. Periprocedural results were compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of ipsilateral stroke, death, and carotid artery restenosis beyond 30 days and within 5 years after the first procedure. The average age was 72.2 years with a majority of male subjects (84.9%). Twenty-seven patients (37%) were asymptomatic. Incidence of periprocedural adverse events and mRS ≤2 at 30 days after CAS were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.14 and 0.07, respectively). CAS was unsuccessful in three patients and one post-procedural minor stroke occurred. Therefore, 69 patients were included in the long-term study. The rate of occurrence of the primary endpoint was 21.7%. Ipsilateral ischemic stroke occurred in one patient, which was due to cardiogenic embolus. Nine patients died, and cancer was the most frequent cause. Five in-stent restenoses were observed. All patients with restenosis underwent additional CAS without any occurrence of stroke. This study revealed the safety and long-term efficacy of CAS in a real-world setting. Routine follow-up is also important for detecting carotid artery restenosis. [Abstract] The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to determine the safety and efficacy of CAS in real-world settings. We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent CAS from 2006 to 2013. Periprocedural results were compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of ipsilateral stroke, death, and carotid artery restenosis beyond 30 days and within 5 years after the first procedure. The average age was 72.2 years with a majority of male subjects (84.9%). Twenty-seven patients (37%) were asymptomatic. Incidence of periprocedural adverse events and mRS <=2 at 30 days after CAS were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.14 and 0.07, respectively). CAS was unsuccessful in three patients and one post-procedural minor stroke occurred. Therefore, 69 patients were included in the long-term study. The rate of occurrence of the primary endpoint was 21.7%. Ipsilateral ischemic stroke occurred in one patient, which was due to cardiogenic embolus. Nine patients died, and cancer was the most frequent cause. Five in-stent restenoses were observed. All patients with restenosis underwent additional CAS without any occurrence of stroke. This study revealed the safety and long-term efficacy of CAS in a real-world setting. Routine follow-up is also important for detecting carotid artery restenosis. |
Author | SHINTAI, Kazunori SEKI, Yukio FUSE, Yutaro KOJIMA, Takao |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: SHINTAI, Kazunori organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: KOJIMA, Takao organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Medical University – sequence: 1 fullname: SEKI, Yukio organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: FUSE, Yutaro organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31902874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNUk1v1DAQtVARXUrvnFAkzlnGdhwnHJBWq7ZUWqmHwtlynMnWVdZeHKew_x6HlG3hgDh4RrLnfcyTX5MT5x0S8pbCklFZfnA7s_R6yYDWeTrsBVlQXtR5Baw-IQsoJOQVBXFKzofBNgCsqApeyVfklNMaWCWLBbneeLfNI4ZddjNG43c4ZL7L1jr4aNtsFdLTIbuN6KJ124_ZKrtNvcfcpBsM2cWPPQaLzuAb8rLT_YDnj_2MfL28-LL-nG9urq7Xq01uZMFiTqUosQFBu1YUTSu4MZ3uDFa0EkWNZceobmQFbaulqTsoOEMqdMFbFNBAzc8InXlHt9eH77rv1T7YnQ4HRUFNyaiUjPJaTcmoKZmE-TRj9mOzw3byHvQTzmur_nxx9k5t_YOSILkESATvHwmC_zbiENW9H4NLeyrGK8FrTsU09e65zJH_d9xpoJwHTPDDELBTxkYdrZ9Ubf-vBeAv4H_sfDVDkhNrdO9dbx0--TYtdTgGTBAGCqBMa6bGEprRqYj0maCoJ9eXM9P9EPUWj9I6RGt6_CVdguJTeW7hOGDudFDo-E-ZodYh |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00234_023_03248_0 |
Cites_doi | 10.1056/NEJMoa0708028 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.07.018 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92916-P 10.1007/s00415-012-6436-3 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.06.024 10.1007/s00701-012-1508-9 10.1161/01.STR.0000106913.33940.DD 10.1056/NEJMx100035 10.1038/bmt.2012.244 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.556068 10.3174/ajnr.A1015 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.106 10.1056/NEJM199811123392002 10.1002/bjs.9027 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2020 by The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2020 The Japan Neurosurgical Society The Japan Neurosurgical Society The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2020 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 by The Japan Neurosurgical Society – notice: 2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2020 The Japan Neurosurgical Society The Japan Neurosurgical Society The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2020 |
CorporateAuthor | Fukushima Medical University Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital Department of Neurosurgery |
CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: Department of Neurosurgery – name: Fukushima Medical University – name: Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK K9. 5PM ADTOC UNPAY |
DOI | 10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0192 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content Unpaywall |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: UNPAY name: Unpaywall url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/ sourceTypes: Open Access Repository |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1349-8029 |
EndPage | 125 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0192 PMC7073700 31902874 10_2176_nmc_oa_2019_0192 cd1neure_2020_006003_002_0121_01253490494 article_nmc_60_3_60_oa_2019_0192_article_char_en |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .55 .GJ 123 29N 2WC 3O- 53G 7.U ACPRK ADBBV AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BKOMP CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z F5P GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HYE JMI JSF JSH KQ8 MOJWN OK1 OVT P6G PGMZT RJT RNS RPM RZJ TKC TR2 X7J X7M AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK K9. 5PM ADTOC UNPAY |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c742t-1756eb051fd54bd53ccfafce818549e6f21ab780dda7c9f0432e15a43de50b093 |
IEDL.DBID | UNPAY |
ISSN | 0470-8105 1349-8029 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 20 00:10:30 EDT 2025 Tue Sep 30 16:23:02 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 20 13:21:09 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:57:26 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:57:39 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:55:02 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 16:14:54 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 03 06:13:09 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | carotid artery stenting restenosis real-world setting stenosis long-term |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 cc-by-nc-nd |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c742t-1756eb051fd54bd53ccfafce818549e6f21ab780dda7c9f0432e15a43de50b093 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
OpenAccessLink | https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/nmc/60/3/60_oa.2019-0192/_pdf |
PMID | 31902874 |
PQID | 2385393150 |
PQPubID | 2048494 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | unpaywall_primary_10_2176_nmc_oa_2019_0192 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7073700 proquest_journals_2385393150 pubmed_primary_31902874 crossref_citationtrail_10_2176_nmc_oa_2019_0192 crossref_primary_10_2176_nmc_oa_2019_0192 medicalonline_journals_cd1neure_2020_006003_002_0121_01253490494 jstage_primary_article_nmc_60_3_60_oa_2019_0192_article_char_en |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-00-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2020 text: 2020-00-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Japan |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Japan – name: Tokyo |
PublicationTitle | Neurologia medico-chirurgica |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Neurol. Med. Chir.(Tokyo) |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | The Japan Neurosurgical Society THE JAPAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY Japan Science and Technology Agency |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Japan Neurosurgical Society – name: THE JAPAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY – name: Japan Science and Technology Agency |
References | 10) Yamada K, Kawasaki M, Yoshimura S, et al.: Prediction of silent ischemic lesions after carotid artery stenting using integrated backscatter ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Atherosclerosis 208: 161–166, 2010 16) Wasser K, Schnaudigel S, Wohlfahrt J, et al.: Clinical impact and predictors of carotid artery in-stent restenosis. J Neurol 259: 1896–1902, 2012 19) Warlow C: MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 337: 1235–1243, 1991 11) Miyachi S, Taki W, Sakai N, Nakahara I: Historical perspective of carotid artery stenting in Japan: analysis of 8,092 cases in The Japanese CAS survey. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154: 2127–2137, 2012 3) Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J, et al.: Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363: 1491–1502, 2004 6) Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Brückmann H, et al.: 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 368: 1239–1247, 2006 4) Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B: Carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: clinical alert from the endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial. Stroke 35: e18–e20, 2004 21) Bekelis K, Moses Z, Missios S, Desai A, Labropoulos N: Indications for treatment of recurrent carotid stenosis. Br J Surg 100: 440–447, 2013 2) Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al.: Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 339: 1415–1425, 1998 14) Cambria RP: Commentary on: Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, et al. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1660–1671. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 19: 201–203, 2007 5) Mas JL, Trinquart L, Leys D, et al.: Endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Neurol 7: 885–892, 2008 15) Yoshimura S, Yamada K, Kawasaki M, et al.: Selection of carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy based on magnetic resonance plaque imaging reduced periprocedural adverse events. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 22: 1082–1087, 2013 20) Kumar R, Batchelder A, Saratzis A, et al.: Restenosis after carotid interventions and its relationship with recurrent ipsilateral stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 53: 766–775, 2017 18) Pourier VE, de Borst GJ: Technical options for treatment of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 64: 1486–1496, 2016 8) Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P, et al.: Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 358: 1572–1579, 2008 1) Abbott AL: Medical (nonsurgical) intervention alone is now best for prevention of stroke associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis: results of a systematic review and analysis. Stroke 40: e573–e583, 2009 7) Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G, et al.: Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 363: 11–23, 2010 12) Kanda Y: Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48: 452–458, 2013 17) Texakalidis P, Tzoumas A, Giannopoulos S, et al.: Risk factors for restenosis after carotid revascularization: a meta-analysis of hazard ratios. World Neurosurg 125: 414–424, 2019 9) Yoshida K, Narumi O, Chin M, et al.: Characterization of carotid atherosclerosis and detection of soft plaque with use of black-blood MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29: 868–874, 2008 13) Hopkins LN, Roubin GS, Chakhtoura EY, et al.: The carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial: credentialing of interventionalists and final results of lead-in phase. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 19: 153–162, 2010 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 10 21 |
References_xml | – reference: 19) Warlow C: MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 337: 1235–1243, 1991 – reference: 4) Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B: Carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: clinical alert from the endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial. Stroke 35: e18–e20, 2004 – reference: 17) Texakalidis P, Tzoumas A, Giannopoulos S, et al.: Risk factors for restenosis after carotid revascularization: a meta-analysis of hazard ratios. World Neurosurg 125: 414–424, 2019 – reference: 6) Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Brückmann H, et al.: 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 368: 1239–1247, 2006 – reference: 9) Yoshida K, Narumi O, Chin M, et al.: Characterization of carotid atherosclerosis and detection of soft plaque with use of black-blood MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29: 868–874, 2008 – reference: 10) Yamada K, Kawasaki M, Yoshimura S, et al.: Prediction of silent ischemic lesions after carotid artery stenting using integrated backscatter ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Atherosclerosis 208: 161–166, 2010 – reference: 5) Mas JL, Trinquart L, Leys D, et al.: Endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Neurol 7: 885–892, 2008 – reference: 13) Hopkins LN, Roubin GS, Chakhtoura EY, et al.: The carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial: credentialing of interventionalists and final results of lead-in phase. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 19: 153–162, 2010 – reference: 16) Wasser K, Schnaudigel S, Wohlfahrt J, et al.: Clinical impact and predictors of carotid artery in-stent restenosis. J Neurol 259: 1896–1902, 2012 – reference: 21) Bekelis K, Moses Z, Missios S, Desai A, Labropoulos N: Indications for treatment of recurrent carotid stenosis. Br J Surg 100: 440–447, 2013 – reference: 8) Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P, et al.: Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 358: 1572–1579, 2008 – reference: 1) Abbott AL: Medical (nonsurgical) intervention alone is now best for prevention of stroke associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis: results of a systematic review and analysis. Stroke 40: e573–e583, 2009 – reference: 11) Miyachi S, Taki W, Sakai N, Nakahara I: Historical perspective of carotid artery stenting in Japan: analysis of 8,092 cases in The Japanese CAS survey. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154: 2127–2137, 2012 – reference: 18) Pourier VE, de Borst GJ: Technical options for treatment of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 64: 1486–1496, 2016 – reference: 3) Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J, et al.: Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363: 1491–1502, 2004 – reference: 14) Cambria RP: Commentary on: Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, et al. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1660–1671. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 19: 201–203, 2007 – reference: 20) Kumar R, Batchelder A, Saratzis A, et al.: Restenosis after carotid interventions and its relationship with recurrent ipsilateral stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 53: 766–775, 2017 – reference: 12) Kanda Y: Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48: 452–458, 2013 – reference: 7) Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G, et al.: Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 363: 11–23, 2010 – reference: 2) Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al.: Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 339: 1415–1425, 1998 – reference: 15) Yoshimura S, Yamada K, Kawasaki M, et al.: Selection of carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy based on magnetic resonance plaque imaging reduced periprocedural adverse events. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 22: 1082–1087, 2013 – ident: 8 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708028 – ident: 15 doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.07.018 – ident: 17 – ident: 3 – ident: 19 doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92916-P – ident: 5 – ident: 16 doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6436-3 – ident: 10 doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.06.024 – ident: 11 doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1508-9 – ident: 13 – ident: 4 doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000106913.33940.DD – ident: 14 – ident: 7 doi: 10.1056/NEJMx100035 – ident: 12 doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244 – ident: 1 doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.556068 – ident: 9 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1015 – ident: 18 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.106 – ident: 2 doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811123392002 – ident: 6 – ident: 20 – ident: 21 doi: 10.1002/bjs.9027 |
SSID | ssib002484387 ssj0037382 ssib002484385 ssib042166867 ssib058493722 ssib023157258 ssib058493721 ssib000959794 ssib023157257 ssib044754309 ssib058493723 |
Score | 2.200008 |
Snippet | The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to... [Abstract] The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution... |
SourceID | unpaywall pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref medicalonline jstage |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 121 |
SubjectTerms | Aged Angioplasty Carotid arteries Carotid artery carotid artery stenting Carotid Stenosis - diagnosis Carotid Stenosis - mortality Carotid Stenosis - surgery Embolism Female Humans Implants Ischemia long-term Male Original real-world setting Recurrence Restenosis Retrospective Studies Stenosis Stents Stroke Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
Title | Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience |
URI | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/nmc/60/3/60_oa.2019-0192/_article/-char/en http://mol.medicalonline.jp/library/journal/download?GoodsID=cd1neure/2020/006003/002&name=0121-0125e https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31902874 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2385393150 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7073700 https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/nmc/60/3/60_oa.2019-0192/_pdf |
UnpaywallVersion | publishedVersion |
Volume | 60 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2020, Vol.60(3), pp.121-125 |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1349-8029 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0037382 issn: 0470-8105 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 19590101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) customDbUrl: eissn: 1349-8029 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0037382 issn: 0470-8105 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVBFR databaseName: Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1349-8029 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0037382 issn: 0470-8105 databaseCode: DIK dateStart: 19590101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com providerName: Flying Publisher – providerCode: PRVFQY databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1349-8029 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0037382 issn: 0470-8105 databaseCode: GX1 dateStart: 0 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1349-8029 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssib044754309 issn: 0470-8105 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVAQN databaseName: PubMed Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1349-8029 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0037382 issn: 0470-8105 databaseCode: RPM dateStart: 20130101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ providerName: National Library of Medicine |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Jb9NAFH6CFAkQYhGboVQ-cAHJ9sS7uUCEWpUloahEak8jz-LQktpR6giVA7-d9zyOkwACIS4zB78ZeT4_v_lm-wbgKfYhiY7CwmFM4wAlTpWTRr5ygjjLZJjiI58OOA9H8f44fHsUHa2dhaFtlafIiyaaMndSuaczrwXRK8-kFzMvwIRXJBpEB3CQonh8porLsBXTIlMPtsajg8ExheAwYU5q9jGSDB-GYz8za5XIxGOqz12vZ6NvumJe4zrcODNLJka64ndM9NcNlVcX5Sy_-JpPp2u91d4tkMt2mk0qX9xFLVz57ScJyP8D4jbcbMmsPTD2d-CSLu_Cm_dVOXEo4tsfFjU6tD63q8KmnSX1iSJjPb-wD2vd3FHxwh7Yh5hPtUPN0nN7Jb58D8Z7u59e7zvthQ2OxBF27SAVibXA37xQUShUFEhZ5IXURArCTMeF389FkjKl8kRmBakB6n6Uh4HSERMsC-5Dr6xK_RBsicxEhyJkhcAxlexnSPtyJjTLcUAqfN8Cb_mpuGzVzOlSjSnHUQ19XI4YITacsOGEjQXPuhIzo-TxB9uXBvvOskW-sUTQA94gvyrRGdBhOYw4FrzacBvehoZzLlWfpEo1lvVJmhV9NsDM56SuR0mEnkqqPRZsLz1tVRoZVhRkAdJ4Cx4Yp-veEaMpo-sLLEg23LEzICnxzSflyedGUjzBSJ8wrPN557h_BenRvxg_hmvUXjN5tQ29er7QT5DO1WKnmQbB9N3HFNPh911MRwfDnfY__gHN1knj |
linkProvider | Unpaywall |
linkToUnpaywall | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lj9MwEB5BFwkQ4iFegQXlwAWkJG7e4QIVYrUgWJCWSsvJiu1J2aWbVN1UaPn1zNRp2gICIS7xIWMr_jIZfxPbnwGe0BiSYRJXnhBICUqaGy9PQuNFaVHoOKdbIW9wfn-Q7o_jt0fJ0cZeGF5WeUK8aIJc-JPGP5kFHYhBfaqDVAQRXWTDokG8AYcoSiBnproIOylPMg1gZ3zwcfSZQ3CcCS-36xhZho_CcVjYuUpi4im352-2szU2XbKPcRWundopEytd8Tsm-uuCysuLelaefyun043Rau8G6FU_7SKVr_6iVb7-_pME5P8BcROud2TWHVn7W3AB69vw5l1TTzyO-O6HRUsOjWduU7m8sqQ9NmyM83P3sMXlGRXP3ZF7SOUUPe4Wzt21-PIdGO-9_vRq3-sObPA0ZditR1QkRUWfeWWSWJkk0roqK41MCuIC0yoclirLhTFlpouK1QBxmJRxZDARShTRXRjUTY33wdXETDBWsagU5VR6WBDtK4VCUVJCqsLQgWD1qqTu1Mz5UI2ppKyGX64kjAgbydhIxsaBp32NmVXy-IPtC4t9b9khv7Qk0CO5RH5dozfgzXIUcRx4ueU2sgsNZ1KbIUuVItUNWZqVfDaiIpSsrseXhDyVVXsc2F152ro2MawkKiKi8Q7cs07XPyNFU8HHFziQbbljb8BS4tt36uMvS0nxjCJ9JqjNZ73j_hWkB_9i_BCucH_tz6tdGLTzBT4iOteqx933-gMc40W8 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term+Outcomes+of+Carotid+Artery+Stenting+%3A+A+Single-center+Experience&rft.jtitle=Neurologia+medico-chirurgica&rft.au=Yutaro+FUSE&rft.au=Takao+KOJIMA&rft.au=Kazunori+SHINTAI&rft.au=Yukio+SEKI&rft.date=2020&rft.pub=THE+JAPAN+NEUROSURGICAL+SOCIETY&rft.issn=0470-8105&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=125&rft_id=info:doi/10.2176%2Fnmc.oa.2019-0192&rft.externalDocID=cd1neure_2020_006003_002_0121_01253490494 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0470-8105&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0470-8105&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0470-8105&client=summon |