Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience

The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to determine the safety and efficacy of CAS in real-world settings. We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent CAS from 2006 to 2013. Peripro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurologia medico-chirurgica Vol. 60; no. 3; pp. 121 - 125
Main Authors SHINTAI, Kazunori, KOJIMA, Takao, SEKI, Yukio, FUSE, Yutaro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2020
THE JAPAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0470-8105
1349-8029
1349-8029
DOI10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0192

Cover

Abstract The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to determine the safety and efficacy of CAS in real-world settings. We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent CAS from 2006 to 2013. Periprocedural results were compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of ipsilateral stroke, death, and carotid artery restenosis beyond 30 days and within 5 years after the first procedure. The average age was 72.2 years with a majority of male subjects (84.9%). Twenty-seven patients (37%) were asymptomatic. Incidence of periprocedural adverse events and mRS ≤2 at 30 days after CAS were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.14 and 0.07, respectively). CAS was unsuccessful in three patients and one post-procedural minor stroke occurred. Therefore, 69 patients were included in the long-term study. The rate of occurrence of the primary endpoint was 21.7%. Ipsilateral ischemic stroke occurred in one patient, which was due to cardiogenic embolus. Nine patients died, and cancer was the most frequent cause. Five in-stent restenoses were observed. All patients with restenosis underwent additional CAS without any occurrence of stroke. This study revealed the safety and long-term efficacy of CAS in a real-world setting. Routine follow-up is also important for detecting carotid artery restenosis.
AbstractList The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to determine the safety and efficacy of CAS in real-world settings. We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent CAS from 2006 to 2013. Periprocedural results were compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of ipsilateral stroke, death, and carotid artery restenosis beyond 30 days and within 5 years after the first procedure. The average age was 72.2 years with a majority of male subjects (84.9%). Twenty-seven patients (37%) were asymptomatic. Incidence of periprocedural adverse events and mRS ≤2 at 30 days after CAS were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.14 and 0.07, respectively). CAS was unsuccessful in three patients and one post-procedural minor stroke occurred. Therefore, 69 patients were included in the long-term study. The rate of occurrence of the primary endpoint was 21.7%. Ipsilateral ischemic stroke occurred in one patient, which was due to cardiogenic embolus. Nine patients died, and cancer was the most frequent cause. Five in-stent restenoses were observed. All patients with restenosis underwent additional CAS without any occurrence of stroke. This study revealed the safety and long-term efficacy of CAS in a real-world setting. Routine follow-up is also important for detecting carotid artery restenosis.
[Abstract] The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to determine the safety and efficacy of CAS in real-world settings. We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent CAS from 2006 to 2013. Periprocedural results were compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of ipsilateral stroke, death, and carotid artery restenosis beyond 30 days and within 5 years after the first procedure. The average age was 72.2 years with a majority of male subjects (84.9%). Twenty-seven patients (37%) were asymptomatic. Incidence of periprocedural adverse events and mRS <=2 at 30 days after CAS were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.14 and 0.07, respectively). CAS was unsuccessful in three patients and one post-procedural minor stroke occurred. Therefore, 69 patients were included in the long-term study. The rate of occurrence of the primary endpoint was 21.7%. Ipsilateral ischemic stroke occurred in one patient, which was due to cardiogenic embolus. Nine patients died, and cancer was the most frequent cause. Five in-stent restenoses were observed. All patients with restenosis underwent additional CAS without any occurrence of stroke. This study revealed the safety and long-term efficacy of CAS in a real-world setting. Routine follow-up is also important for detecting carotid artery restenosis.
Author SHINTAI, Kazunori
SEKI, Yukio
FUSE, Yutaro
KOJIMA, Takao
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: SHINTAI, Kazunori
  organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: KOJIMA, Takao
  organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Medical University
– sequence: 1
  fullname: SEKI, Yukio
  organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: FUSE, Yutaro
  organization: Department of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31902874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNUk1v1DAQtVARXUrvnFAkzlnGdhwnHJBWq7ZUWqmHwtlynMnWVdZeHKew_x6HlG3hgDh4RrLnfcyTX5MT5x0S8pbCklFZfnA7s_R6yYDWeTrsBVlQXtR5Baw-IQsoJOQVBXFKzofBNgCsqApeyVfklNMaWCWLBbneeLfNI4ZddjNG43c4ZL7L1jr4aNtsFdLTIbuN6KJ124_ZKrtNvcfcpBsM2cWPPQaLzuAb8rLT_YDnj_2MfL28-LL-nG9urq7Xq01uZMFiTqUosQFBu1YUTSu4MZ3uDFa0EkWNZceobmQFbaulqTsoOEMqdMFbFNBAzc8InXlHt9eH77rv1T7YnQ4HRUFNyaiUjPJaTcmoKZmE-TRj9mOzw3byHvQTzmur_nxx9k5t_YOSILkESATvHwmC_zbiENW9H4NLeyrGK8FrTsU09e65zJH_d9xpoJwHTPDDELBTxkYdrZ9Ubf-vBeAv4H_sfDVDkhNrdO9dbx0--TYtdTgGTBAGCqBMa6bGEprRqYj0maCoJ9eXM9P9EPUWj9I6RGt6_CVdguJTeW7hOGDudFDo-E-ZodYh
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00234_023_03248_0
Cites_doi 10.1056/NEJMoa0708028
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.07.018
10.1016/0140-6736(91)92916-P
10.1007/s00415-012-6436-3
10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.06.024
10.1007/s00701-012-1508-9
10.1161/01.STR.0000106913.33940.DD
10.1056/NEJMx100035
10.1038/bmt.2012.244
10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.556068
10.3174/ajnr.A1015
10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.106
10.1056/NEJM199811123392002
10.1002/bjs.9027
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 by The Japan Neurosurgical Society
2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
2020 The Japan Neurosurgical Society The Japan Neurosurgical Society The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2020
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 by The Japan Neurosurgical Society
– notice: 2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: 2020 The Japan Neurosurgical Society The Japan Neurosurgical Society The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2020
CorporateAuthor Fukushima Medical University
Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital
Department of Neurosurgery
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: Department of Neurosurgery
– name: Fukushima Medical University
– name: Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TK
K9.
5PM
ADTOC
UNPAY
DOI 10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0192
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content
Unpaywall
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList


ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: UNPAY
  name: Unpaywall
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Access Repository
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1349-8029
EndPage 125
ExternalDocumentID 10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0192
PMC7073700
31902874
10_2176_nmc_oa_2019_0192
cd1neure_2020_006003_002_0121_01253490494
article_nmc_60_3_60_oa_2019_0192_article_char_en
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.55
.GJ
123
29N
2WC
3O-
53G
7.U
ACPRK
ADBBV
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BKOMP
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
JMI
JSF
JSH
KQ8
MOJWN
OK1
OVT
P6G
PGMZT
RJT
RNS
RPM
RZJ
TKC
TR2
X7J
X7M
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TK
K9.
5PM
ADTOC
UNPAY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c742t-1756eb051fd54bd53ccfafce818549e6f21ab780dda7c9f0432e15a43de50b093
IEDL.DBID UNPAY
ISSN 0470-8105
1349-8029
IngestDate Wed Aug 20 00:10:30 EDT 2025
Tue Sep 30 16:23:02 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 20 13:21:09 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:57:26 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:57:39 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:55:02 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 16:14:54 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 03 06:13:09 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords carotid artery stenting
restenosis
real-world setting
stenosis
long-term
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
cc-by-nc-nd
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c742t-1756eb051fd54bd53ccfafce818549e6f21ab780dda7c9f0432e15a43de50b093
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
OpenAccessLink https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/nmc/60/3/60_oa.2019-0192/_pdf
PMID 31902874
PQID 2385393150
PQPubID 2048494
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs unpaywall_primary_10_2176_nmc_oa_2019_0192
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7073700
proquest_journals_2385393150
pubmed_primary_31902874
crossref_citationtrail_10_2176_nmc_oa_2019_0192
crossref_primary_10_2176_nmc_oa_2019_0192
medicalonline_journals_cd1neure_2020_006003_002_0121_01253490494
jstage_primary_article_nmc_60_3_60_oa_2019_0192_article_char_en
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2020
  text: 2020-00-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Japan
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Japan
– name: Tokyo
PublicationTitle Neurologia medico-chirurgica
PublicationTitleAlternate Neurol. Med. Chir.(Tokyo)
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher The Japan Neurosurgical Society
THE JAPAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Publisher_xml – name: The Japan Neurosurgical Society
– name: THE JAPAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY
– name: Japan Science and Technology Agency
References 10) Yamada K, Kawasaki M, Yoshimura S, et al.: Prediction of silent ischemic lesions after carotid artery stenting using integrated backscatter ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Atherosclerosis 208: 161–166, 2010
16) Wasser K, Schnaudigel S, Wohlfahrt J, et al.: Clinical impact and predictors of carotid artery in-stent restenosis. J Neurol 259: 1896–1902, 2012
19) Warlow C: MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 337: 1235–1243, 1991
11) Miyachi S, Taki W, Sakai N, Nakahara I: Historical perspective of carotid artery stenting in Japan: analysis of 8,092 cases in The Japanese CAS survey. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154: 2127–2137, 2012
3) Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J, et al.: Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363: 1491–1502, 2004
6) Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Brückmann H, et al.: 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 368: 1239–1247, 2006
4) Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B: Carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: clinical alert from the endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial. Stroke 35: e18–e20, 2004
21) Bekelis K, Moses Z, Missios S, Desai A, Labropoulos N: Indications for treatment of recurrent carotid stenosis. Br J Surg 100: 440–447, 2013
2) Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al.: Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 339: 1415–1425, 1998
14) Cambria RP: Commentary on: Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, et al. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1660–1671. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 19: 201–203, 2007
5) Mas JL, Trinquart L, Leys D, et al.: Endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Neurol 7: 885–892, 2008
15) Yoshimura S, Yamada K, Kawasaki M, et al.: Selection of carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy based on magnetic resonance plaque imaging reduced periprocedural adverse events. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 22: 1082–1087, 2013
20) Kumar R, Batchelder A, Saratzis A, et al.: Restenosis after carotid interventions and its relationship with recurrent ipsilateral stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 53: 766–775, 2017
18) Pourier VE, de Borst GJ: Technical options for treatment of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 64: 1486–1496, 2016
8) Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P, et al.: Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 358: 1572–1579, 2008
1) Abbott AL: Medical (nonsurgical) intervention alone is now best for prevention of stroke associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis: results of a systematic review and analysis. Stroke 40: e573–e583, 2009
7) Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G, et al.: Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 363: 11–23, 2010
12) Kanda Y: Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48: 452–458, 2013
17) Texakalidis P, Tzoumas A, Giannopoulos S, et al.: Risk factors for restenosis after carotid revascularization: a meta-analysis of hazard ratios. World Neurosurg 125: 414–424, 2019
9) Yoshida K, Narumi O, Chin M, et al.: Characterization of carotid atherosclerosis and detection of soft plaque with use of black-blood MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29: 868–874, 2008
13) Hopkins LN, Roubin GS, Chakhtoura EY, et al.: The carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial: credentialing of interventionalists and final results of lead-in phase. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 19: 153–162, 2010
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20
10
21
References_xml – reference: 19) Warlow C: MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 337: 1235–1243, 1991
– reference: 4) Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B: Carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: clinical alert from the endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial. Stroke 35: e18–e20, 2004
– reference: 17) Texakalidis P, Tzoumas A, Giannopoulos S, et al.: Risk factors for restenosis after carotid revascularization: a meta-analysis of hazard ratios. World Neurosurg 125: 414–424, 2019
– reference: 6) Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Brückmann H, et al.: 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 368: 1239–1247, 2006
– reference: 9) Yoshida K, Narumi O, Chin M, et al.: Characterization of carotid atherosclerosis and detection of soft plaque with use of black-blood MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29: 868–874, 2008
– reference: 10) Yamada K, Kawasaki M, Yoshimura S, et al.: Prediction of silent ischemic lesions after carotid artery stenting using integrated backscatter ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Atherosclerosis 208: 161–166, 2010
– reference: 5) Mas JL, Trinquart L, Leys D, et al.: Endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Neurol 7: 885–892, 2008
– reference: 13) Hopkins LN, Roubin GS, Chakhtoura EY, et al.: The carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial: credentialing of interventionalists and final results of lead-in phase. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 19: 153–162, 2010
– reference: 16) Wasser K, Schnaudigel S, Wohlfahrt J, et al.: Clinical impact and predictors of carotid artery in-stent restenosis. J Neurol 259: 1896–1902, 2012
– reference: 21) Bekelis K, Moses Z, Missios S, Desai A, Labropoulos N: Indications for treatment of recurrent carotid stenosis. Br J Surg 100: 440–447, 2013
– reference: 8) Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P, et al.: Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 358: 1572–1579, 2008
– reference: 1) Abbott AL: Medical (nonsurgical) intervention alone is now best for prevention of stroke associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis: results of a systematic review and analysis. Stroke 40: e573–e583, 2009
– reference: 11) Miyachi S, Taki W, Sakai N, Nakahara I: Historical perspective of carotid artery stenting in Japan: analysis of 8,092 cases in The Japanese CAS survey. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154: 2127–2137, 2012
– reference: 18) Pourier VE, de Borst GJ: Technical options for treatment of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 64: 1486–1496, 2016
– reference: 3) Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J, et al.: Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363: 1491–1502, 2004
– reference: 14) Cambria RP: Commentary on: Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, et al. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1660–1671. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 19: 201–203, 2007
– reference: 20) Kumar R, Batchelder A, Saratzis A, et al.: Restenosis after carotid interventions and its relationship with recurrent ipsilateral stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 53: 766–775, 2017
– reference: 12) Kanda Y: Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48: 452–458, 2013
– reference: 7) Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G, et al.: Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 363: 11–23, 2010
– reference: 2) Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al.: Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 339: 1415–1425, 1998
– reference: 15) Yoshimura S, Yamada K, Kawasaki M, et al.: Selection of carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy based on magnetic resonance plaque imaging reduced periprocedural adverse events. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 22: 1082–1087, 2013
– ident: 8
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708028
– ident: 15
  doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.07.018
– ident: 17
– ident: 3
– ident: 19
  doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92916-P
– ident: 5
– ident: 16
  doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6436-3
– ident: 10
  doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.06.024
– ident: 11
  doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1508-9
– ident: 13
– ident: 4
  doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000106913.33940.DD
– ident: 14
– ident: 7
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMx100035
– ident: 12
  doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244
– ident: 1
  doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.556068
– ident: 9
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1015
– ident: 18
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.106
– ident: 2
  doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811123392002
– ident: 6
– ident: 20
– ident: 21
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.9027
SSID ssib002484387
ssj0037382
ssib002484385
ssib042166867
ssib058493722
ssib023157258
ssib058493721
ssib000959794
ssib023157257
ssib044754309
ssib058493723
Score 2.200008
Snippet The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to...
[Abstract] The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution...
SourceID unpaywall
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
medicalonline
jstage
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 121
SubjectTerms Aged
Angioplasty
Carotid arteries
Carotid artery
carotid artery stenting
Carotid Stenosis - diagnosis
Carotid Stenosis - mortality
Carotid Stenosis - surgery
Embolism
Female
Humans
Implants
Ischemia
long-term
Male
Original
real-world setting
Recurrence
Restenosis
Retrospective Studies
Stenosis
Stents
Stroke
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Title Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/nmc/60/3/60_oa.2019-0192/_article/-char/en
http://mol.medicalonline.jp/library/journal/download?GoodsID=cd1neure/2020/006003/002&name=0121-0125e
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31902874
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2385393150
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7073700
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/nmc/60/3/60_oa.2019-0192/_pdf
UnpaywallVersion publishedVersion
Volume 60
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2020, Vol.60(3), pp.121-125
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAFT
  databaseName: Open Access Digital Library
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1349-8029
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0037382
  issn: 0470-8105
  databaseCode: KQ8
  dateStart: 19590101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html
  providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1349-8029
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0037382
  issn: 0470-8105
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20000101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVBFR
  databaseName: Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1349-8029
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0037382
  issn: 0470-8105
  databaseCode: DIK
  dateStart: 19590101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com
  providerName: Flying Publisher
– providerCode: PRVFQY
  databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1349-8029
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0037382
  issn: 0470-8105
  databaseCode: GX1
  dateStart: 0
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php
  providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1349-8029
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssib044754309
  issn: 0470-8105
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20040101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVAQN
  databaseName: PubMed Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1349-8029
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0037382
  issn: 0470-8105
  databaseCode: RPM
  dateStart: 20130101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
  providerName: National Library of Medicine
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Jb9NAFH6CFAkQYhGboVQ-cAHJ9sS7uUCEWpUloahEak8jz-LQktpR6giVA7-d9zyOkwACIS4zB78ZeT4_v_lm-wbgKfYhiY7CwmFM4wAlTpWTRr5ygjjLZJjiI58OOA9H8f44fHsUHa2dhaFtlafIiyaaMndSuaczrwXRK8-kFzMvwIRXJBpEB3CQonh8porLsBXTIlMPtsajg8ExheAwYU5q9jGSDB-GYz8za5XIxGOqz12vZ6NvumJe4zrcODNLJka64ndM9NcNlVcX5Sy_-JpPp2u91d4tkMt2mk0qX9xFLVz57ScJyP8D4jbcbMmsPTD2d-CSLu_Cm_dVOXEo4tsfFjU6tD63q8KmnSX1iSJjPb-wD2vd3FHxwh7Yh5hPtUPN0nN7Jb58D8Z7u59e7zvthQ2OxBF27SAVibXA37xQUShUFEhZ5IXURArCTMeF389FkjKl8kRmBakB6n6Uh4HSERMsC-5Dr6xK_RBsicxEhyJkhcAxlexnSPtyJjTLcUAqfN8Cb_mpuGzVzOlSjSnHUQ19XI4YITacsOGEjQXPuhIzo-TxB9uXBvvOskW-sUTQA94gvyrRGdBhOYw4FrzacBvehoZzLlWfpEo1lvVJmhV9NsDM56SuR0mEnkqqPRZsLz1tVRoZVhRkAdJ4Cx4Yp-veEaMpo-sLLEg23LEzICnxzSflyedGUjzBSJ8wrPN557h_BenRvxg_hmvUXjN5tQ29er7QT5DO1WKnmQbB9N3HFNPh911MRwfDnfY__gHN1knj
linkProvider Unpaywall
linkToUnpaywall http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lj9MwEB5BFwkQ4iFegQXlwAWkJG7e4QIVYrUgWJCWSsvJiu1J2aWbVN1UaPn1zNRp2gICIS7xIWMr_jIZfxPbnwGe0BiSYRJXnhBICUqaGy9PQuNFaVHoOKdbIW9wfn-Q7o_jt0fJ0cZeGF5WeUK8aIJc-JPGP5kFHYhBfaqDVAQRXWTDokG8AYcoSiBnproIOylPMg1gZ3zwcfSZQ3CcCS-36xhZho_CcVjYuUpi4im352-2szU2XbKPcRWundopEytd8Tsm-uuCysuLelaefyun043Rau8G6FU_7SKVr_6iVb7-_pME5P8BcROud2TWHVn7W3AB69vw5l1TTzyO-O6HRUsOjWduU7m8sqQ9NmyM83P3sMXlGRXP3ZF7SOUUPe4Wzt21-PIdGO-9_vRq3-sObPA0ZditR1QkRUWfeWWSWJkk0roqK41MCuIC0yoclirLhTFlpouK1QBxmJRxZDARShTRXRjUTY33wdXETDBWsagU5VR6WBDtK4VCUVJCqsLQgWD1qqTu1Mz5UI2ppKyGX64kjAgbydhIxsaBp32NmVXy-IPtC4t9b9khv7Qk0CO5RH5dozfgzXIUcRx4ueU2sgsNZ1KbIUuVItUNWZqVfDaiIpSsrseXhDyVVXsc2F152ro2MawkKiKi8Q7cs07XPyNFU8HHFziQbbljb8BS4tt36uMvS0nxjCJ9JqjNZ73j_hWkB_9i_BCucH_tz6tdGLTzBT4iOteqx933-gMc40W8
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term+Outcomes+of+Carotid+Artery+Stenting+%3A+A+Single-center+Experience&rft.jtitle=Neurologia+medico-chirurgica&rft.au=Yutaro+FUSE&rft.au=Takao+KOJIMA&rft.au=Kazunori+SHINTAI&rft.au=Yukio+SEKI&rft.date=2020&rft.pub=THE+JAPAN+NEUROSURGICAL+SOCIETY&rft.issn=0470-8105&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=125&rft_id=info:doi/10.2176%2Fnmc.oa.2019-0192&rft.externalDocID=cd1neure_2020_006003_002_0121_01253490494
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0470-8105&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0470-8105&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0470-8105&client=summon