Analysis of energy-based algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction
Background RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA seco...
Saved in:
| Published in | BMC bioinformatics Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 22 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
London
BioMed Central
01.02.2012
BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1471-2105 1471-2105 |
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-13-22 |
Cover
| Abstract | Background
RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters.
Results
We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived).
Conclusions
Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background
RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters.
Results
We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived).
Conclusions
Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets. Doc number: 22 Abstract Background: RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters. Results: We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived). Conclusions: Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets. Abstract Background RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters. Results We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived). Conclusions Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets. RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters. We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived). Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets. RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters. We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived). Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets. Background: RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters. Results: We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived). Conclusions: Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets. RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters.BACKGROUNDRNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters.We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived).RESULTSWe present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived).Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets.CONCLUSIONSLarge datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets. |
| ArticleNumber | 22 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Condon, Anne Hajiaghayi, Monir Hoos, Holger H |
| AuthorAffiliation | 1 Computer Science Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Computer Science Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Monir surname: Hajiaghayi fullname: Hajiaghayi, Monir email: monirh@cs.ubc.ca organization: Computer Science Department, University of British Columbia – sequence: 2 givenname: Anne surname: Condon fullname: Condon, Anne organization: Computer Science Department, University of British Columbia – sequence: 3 givenname: Holger H surname: Hoos fullname: Hoos, Holger H organization: Computer Science Department, University of British Columbia |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22296803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqFks1v1DAQxSNURD_gzA1F4gKHtP5IHPuCtKooLKpAKnC2HGecepW1FzuB7n-P011Wu1VFFUWxJr_3Mnkzp9mR8w6y7DVG5xhzdoHLGhcEo6rAtCDkWXayqxztnY-z0xgXCOGao-pFdkwIEYwjepJ9mTnVr6ONuTc5OAjdumhUhDZXfeeDHW6XMTc-5DdfZ3kE7V2rwjqPQxj1MAbIVwFaqwfr3cvsuVF9hFfb51n28-rjj8vPxfW3T_PL2XWha8KHQgFthUKsbQAqzKlh2CAiOIJGC6MUZbpkmFDcCI6bVjWkrBuNWNPWUCPa0rNsvvFtvVrIVbDL1JH0ysr7gg-dVGGwugfZGEY4I0YZbkqT_p7XDSCmBKOc1mLyQhuv0a3U-o_q-50hRnKKWE4hyilEiakkJEk-bCSrsVlCq8ENQfUHfRy-cfZWdv63pLSshaDJ4N3WIPhfI8RBLm3U0PfKgR9j-gzhFapLLJ5GESaptXQn9O0DdOHHkIZ7T9GaVSyFvaM6leKxzvjUop5M5YxwgURJyypR549Q6WphadMKgLGpfiB4fyBIzAB3Q6fGGOX8-80h-2Y_v11w_3YyAdUG0MHHGMBIbQc1bVjqwvb_GczFA93To9xOPybSdRD2M3tc8hcauw7O |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1093_bioinformatics_bty765 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_imu_2021_100569 crossref_primary_10_53433_yyufbed_1256154 crossref_primary_10_1093_bioinformatics_bty420 crossref_primary_10_1093_nar_gkab716 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_022_04673_3 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0194583 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_imu_2020_100471 crossref_primary_10_1261_rna_033365_112 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12539_015_0266_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms23052452 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12539_014_0208_y crossref_primary_10_1186_s12864_021_07638_7 crossref_primary_10_1017_S003358351600007X crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_14_139 crossref_primary_10_1093_nar_gks1204 crossref_primary_10_1093_bioinformatics_btx287 crossref_primary_10_1089_cmb_2024_0519 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmolb_2018_00111 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ymeth_2019_04_003 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0096759 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13015_016_0070_z crossref_primary_10_1093_molbev_msu402 crossref_primary_10_1093_nar_gkad312 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_15_147 crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules27061936 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10924_021_02336_7 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pgen_1005668 crossref_primary_10_3390_s17091990 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_15_S9_S15 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1038/418122a 10.1093/nar/gkg614 10.1186/1471-2105-11-586 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3001 10.1261/rna.1643609 10.1261/rna.1950510 10.1186/1471-2105-9-340 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl246 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn601 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2700 10.1007/978-3-642-20036-6_48 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 COPYRIGHT 2012 BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright ©2012 Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2012 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2012 Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. – notice: Copyright ©2012 Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISR 3V. 7QO 7SC 7X7 7XB 88E 8AL 8AO 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ARAPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ JQ2 K7- K9. L7M LK8 L~C L~D M0N M0S M1P M7P P5Z P62 P64 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 7TM 5PM ADTOC UNPAY DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-13-22 |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Computing Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Journals ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Computer Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database Proquest Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer Science Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Biological Sciences Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Computing Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Biological Science Database (Proquest) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic Nucleic Acids Abstracts PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content Unpaywall DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database Computer Science Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Collection Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ProQuest Computing ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Computing (Alumni Edition) ProQuest SciTech Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic Nucleic Acids Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE Engineering Research Database MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 5 dbid: UNPAY name: Unpaywall url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/ sourceTypes: Open Access Repository – sequence: 6 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Biology |
| EISSN | 1471-2105 |
| EndPage | 22 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_bf62862faf8f4f17887be06a9638379d 10.1186/1471-2105-13-22 PMC3347993 2661889831 A289094345 22296803 10_1186_1471_2105_13_22 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2VQ 2WC 4.4 53G 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8AO 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AAKPC AASML ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADMLS ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS ARAPS AZQEC BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BGLVJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO ICD IHR INH INR IPNFZ ISR ITC K6V K7- KQ8 LK8 M1P M48 M7P MK~ ML0 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P P62 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RIG RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XH6 XSB AAYXX CITATION ALIPV CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QO 7SC 7XB 8AL 8FD 8FK FR3 JQ2 K9. L7M L~C L~D M0N P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 7TM 5PM 123 ADTOC C1A H13 UNPAY |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c728t-ae3d9a06dbee5183f61f02980ebc9faa36c461231b981bdab247bc06bd7e703d3 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 1471-2105 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:38:05 EDT 2025 Sun Oct 26 03:57:39 EDT 2025 Tue Sep 30 16:32:01 EDT 2025 Mon Oct 06 18:05:43 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 12:58:58 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 05:12:51 EDT 2025 Mon Oct 20 21:54:00 EDT 2025 Mon Oct 20 16:15:37 EDT 2025 Thu Oct 16 15:01:22 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:58:33 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 04:15:21 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:13 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:27:14 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Bootstrap Percentile Method Maximum Expected Accuracy Minimum Free Energy Method Base Pair Probability Minimum Free Energy |
| Language | English |
| License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. cc-by |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c728t-ae3d9a06dbee5183f61f02980ebc9faa36c461231b981bdab247bc06bd7e703d3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/1471-2105-13-22 |
| PMID | 22296803 |
| PQID | 1013765618 |
| PQPubID | 44065 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bf62862faf8f4f17887be06a9638379d unpaywall_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_13_22 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3347993 proquest_miscellaneous_1328507419 proquest_miscellaneous_1012210221 proquest_journals_1013765618 gale_infotracmisc_A289094345 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A289094345 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A289094345 pubmed_primary_22296803 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1471_2105_13_22 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_13_22 springer_journals_10_1186_1471_2105_13_22 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2012-02-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-02-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2012 text: 2012-02-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | BMC bioinformatics |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMC Bioinformatics |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Bioinformatics |
| PublicationYear | 2012 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: Springer Nature B.V – name: BMC |
| References | M Hamada (5153_CR6) 2010; 11 ZJ Lu (5153_CR4) 2009; 15 B Knudsen (5153_CR7) 2003; 31 T Hesterberg (5153_CR14) 2005 5153_CR15 B Ripley (5153_CR16) 2000 M Hamada (5153_CR5) 2009; 25 C Dennis (5153_CR1) 2002; 418 DH Mathews (5153_CR3) 1999; 288 M Andronescu (5153_CR10) 2008; 9 CB Do (5153_CR8) 2006; 22 S Zakov (5153_CR11) 2011; 6577 H Varian (5153_CR13) 2005; 9 M Andronescu (5153_CR9) 2010; 16 E Eden (5153_CR12) 2005 I Tinoco (5153_CR2) 1999; 293 16873527 - Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 15;22(14):e90-8 21118522 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:586 20940338 - RNA. 2010 Dec;16(12):2304-18 19095700 - Bioinformatics. 2009 Feb 15;25(4):465-73 23617269 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:139 10550208 - J Mol Biol. 1999 Oct 22;293(2):271-81 10329189 - J Mol Biol. 1999 May 21;288(5):911-40 19703939 - RNA. 2009 Oct;15(10):1805-13 18700982 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:340 22035327 - J Comput Biol. 2011 Nov;18(11):1525-42 12110860 - Nature. 2002 Jul 11;418(6894):122-4 12824339 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3423-8 |
| References_xml | – volume: 418 start-page: 122 issue: 6894 year: 2002 ident: 5153_CR1 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/418122a – volume: 31 start-page: 3423 issue: 13 year: 2003 ident: 5153_CR7 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Research doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg614 – volume: 11 start-page: 586 year: 2010 ident: 5153_CR6 publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-586 – volume-title: SimTree: A Tool for Computing Similarity Between RNA Secondary Structures year: 2005 ident: 5153_CR12 – volume: 293 start-page: 271 issue: 2 year: 1999 ident: 5153_CR2 publication-title: Journal of Molecular Biology doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3001 – volume: 15 start-page: 1805 issue: 10 year: 2009 ident: 5153_CR4 publication-title: RNA doi: 10.1261/rna.1643609 – volume: 16 start-page: 2304 issue: 12 year: 2010 ident: 5153_CR9 publication-title: RNA doi: 10.1261/rna.1950510 – volume: 9 start-page: 340 year: 2008 ident: 5153_CR10 publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-340 – ident: 5153_CR15 – volume: 9 start-page: 768 issue: 4 year: 2005 ident: 5153_CR13 publication-title: Mathematica Journal – volume-title: The R Project for Statistical Computing year: 2000 ident: 5153_CR16 – volume: 22 start-page: e90 issue: 14 year: 2006 ident: 5153_CR8 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl246 – volume: 25 start-page: 465 year: 2009 ident: 5153_CR5 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn601 – volume-title: Bootstrap methods and permutation tests year: 2005 ident: 5153_CR14 – volume: 288 start-page: 911 issue: 5 year: 1999 ident: 5153_CR3 publication-title: Journal of Molecular Biology doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2700 – volume: 6577 start-page: 546 year: 2011 ident: 5153_CR11 publication-title: Research in Computational Molecular Biology doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-20036-6_48 – reference: 20940338 - RNA. 2010 Dec;16(12):2304-18 – reference: 23617269 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:139 – reference: 16873527 - Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 15;22(14):e90-8 – reference: 19095700 - Bioinformatics. 2009 Feb 15;25(4):465-73 – reference: 19703939 - RNA. 2009 Oct;15(10):1805-13 – reference: 22035327 - J Comput Biol. 2011 Nov;18(11):1525-42 – reference: 10550208 - J Mol Biol. 1999 Oct 22;293(2):271-81 – reference: 12110860 - Nature. 2002 Jul 11;418(6894):122-4 – reference: 10329189 - J Mol Biol. 1999 May 21;288(5):911-40 – reference: 12824339 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3423-8 – reference: 18700982 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:340 – reference: 21118522 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:586 |
| SSID | ssj0017805 |
| Score | 2.2169018 |
| Snippet | Background
RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA... RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function... Background RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA... Doc number: 22 Abstract Background: RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis... Background: RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA... Abstract Background RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins.... |
| SourceID | doaj unpaywall pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 22 |
| SubjectTerms | Accuracy Algorithms Benchmarks Bioinformatics Biomedical and Life Sciences Catalysis Computational Biology/Bioinformatics Computer Appl. in Life Sciences Confidence intervals Gene expression Genetics Life Sciences Methodology Methodology Article Microarrays Nucleic Acid Conformation Predictive Value of Tests Protein folding Ribonuclease P - chemistry Ribonucleic acid RNA RNA - chemistry Statistical methods Structural analysis Structure Studies Synthesis Thermodynamics Transfer RNA |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQJQQcKt6kFGQQEvRgGtuJYx8XRFUq0UOhUm-WHdttpSVZbXaF9t_jyUsbUOmFazyOkpnxPOSZbxB6J3nmTBYo4YJakvlSkejHHXGZYE4q4bJ2xtK3U3F8np1c5Bdbo76gJqyDB-4Yd2gDNE-yYIIM8Z1Q_GZ9KgwoDi-UA-ubSjUkU_39ASD1t31FBSUxqcl7UB8qxeH4jFBOGJv4oxa2_2_jvOWd_qycHK9PH6B762phNr_MfL7loY4eot0-tMSz7pceoTu-eozudsMmN0_QyYA_guuAfdvyR8CHOWzml_XyenX1s8ExhMVnpzPcQJ7szHKDO4DZ9dLjxRIudUCQT9H50Zcfn49JP0mBlAWTK2I8d8qkwlnv83iIg6ABsNdTb0sVjOGizACHhVoVw1hnLMsKW6bCusJHk-D4M7RT1ZV_gbA3NEirvLHUZym31sGgMhVsCNZG2gR9HPipyx5mHKZdzHWbbkihQQAaBKAp14wl6MO4YdEhbNxM-gkENJIBNHb7ICqM7hVG36YwCXoL4tUAflFBdc2lWTeN_vr9TM_g1hUA8_IEve-JQh2_vjR9s0LkAeBlTSj3J5TxdJbT5UGLdG8dGiiri3Y9Rq4yQW_GZdgJFW-Vr9ctDWvTcfoPGs5kDjGhStDzTjFH3sCcdiFBHsVEZSfMm65U11ctvjiH7mIVdx4Myr396TdI5mDU_tukuPc_pPgS3Y-hK-vq5_fRTjwL_lUMD1f2dWsJfgPre1uy priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3db9QwDLfGTYjxgPimMFBBSLCHQJP00vYBoRvaNCZxQgeT9hYlTXKbdLTHfQjdf0_cL66gjdfGkVrbsZ3a_hngdcpjo2JHCRdUk9jmGfF-3BATC2bSTJi4mrH0ZSxOzuLT8-H5DozbXhgsq2xtYmWoTZnjP3J_uqk_C97bpx_nPwlOjcLsajtCQzWjFcyHCmLsBuwyRMYawO7h0fjrpMsrIIJ_A_BDU_GeetNMPN2QUE4Y6_mmCsL_X0O95an-rqLsUqm34da6mKvNLzWbbXmr47twpwkzw1GtF_dgxxb34WY9eHLzAE5bLJKwdKGt2v8I-jMTqtnUf_Xq4scy9OFsOBmPwiXemY1abMIabHa9sOF8gQkeFOpDODs--v7phDRTFUiesHRFlOUmU5Ew2lrPKu4EdYjDHlmdZ04pLvIYMVmoznxIa5RmcaLzSGiTWG8eDH8Eg6Is7BMIraIu1ZlVmto44lobHFqWOe2c1p42gHctP2XeQI7j5IuZrK4eqZAoAIkCkJRLxgJ4222Y12gbV5MeooA6MoTJrh6Ui6lsTp3UDjtvmVMudV4hsXJS20gotDo8yUwAr1C8EoEwCqy0mar1cik_f5vIEWZgETxvGMCbhsiV_u1z1TQueB4gdlaPcr9H6U9q3l9utUg2lmIp_-h1AC-7ZdyJ1W-FLdcVDauu5vQaGs7SIcaHWQCPa8XseIMz20WK8kh6KttjXn-luLyosMY5dhpnfudBq9zbr36FZA467f-fFJ9ez5JnsOcDVFZXye_DwGu5fe6DwJV-0Zzs32-6V-A priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELZQEQIOiDeBggxCgh5c4jhxnONSUZVK9FCo1Jtlx3ZbaUlW-xDaf8-Mk402QEFc43FkeZ7WzHxDyFslcmfywJmQ3LLc1xUDP-6Yy2XmVCVdHmcsfTmRR2f58Xlx3oMkYS_Mdv6eK_mBg_Fk8CwpGBcsA1t7EzyUjFlZeTCkCxCYv8ft-cOmkcuJyPy_298tB_RrceSQIb1Lbq-amVn_MNPplhM6vE_u9dEjnXTsfkBu-OYhudXNk1w_IscbiBHaBupjVx9DN-WomV6086vl5fcFhSiVnp5M6AKfws7M17TDkF3NPZ3NMW-DvHpMzg4_fTs4Yv2wBFaXmVoy44WrTCqd9b4APQ2SB4RXT72tq2CMkHWOUCvcVhCpOmOzvLR1Kq0rPWi9E0_ITtM2_hmh3vCgbOWN5T5PhbUOZ5FVwYZgLdAmZH9zn7rukcRxoMVUxxeFkhoZoJEBmgudZQl5P2yYdSAa15N-RAYNZIh-HT-AUOhembQN2FCbBRNUADnDgkjrU2nQmIiycgl5g-zViG_RYAHNhVktFvrz11M9wcQqYuIVCXnXE4UWTl-bvh8B7gAhsUaUuyNKUMB6vLyRIt0bgAVWzoHphuBUJeT1sIw7sait8e0q0mTxxc3_QiMyVWDYVyXkaSeYw93gKHapkB_lSGRHlzdeaa4uI4S4wAbiCnbubYR7--jXcGZvkP5_cfH5f_z3BbkDQWjWVcLvkh0Qef8SAr2lfRWV_CdxdUhs priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature – databaseName: Unpaywall dbid: UNPAY link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwED9NnRDwwPcgMFBASLAHd02cuMljQUxjEgUNKo0ny47trqJLqrQVKn89vsSJmsFASLzWZ8m5b9d3vwN4mdBIicgEhLJAkkhnKbFxXBEVsVAlKVNRNWPpw5gdT6KTs_hsBz42vTDyIpOzwoGGIlBxf7sNfV53OeAUBV0eLpSpjT5hh4F1ssReX2ISUBJan7zLYpuc92B3Mv40-lr1GDkKB_Dzm12d2FRB-P_qqLci1eUqyvYp9SZcX-cLsfku5vOtaHV0GxbNd9ZFKt_665XsZz8uQUD-R0bcgVsus_VHtSrehR2d34Nr9azLzX04aeBP_ML4uuo4JBhClS_m06Kcrc4vlr49hn86HvlLvKYrUW78Gt92XWp_UeKbEurRA5gcvfvy9pi4QQ4kG4bJighNVSoGTEmtY-tDDAsMQr8PtMxSIwRlWYQwMIFMbRathAyjocwGTKqhth5J0T3o5UWuH4GvRWASmWohAx0NqJQK56SlRhojpaX1oN-IkGcO5RyHbcx5ddtJGEcGcWQQDygPQw9etxsWNcDH1aRvUCdaMkTmrn4oyil3hs6lwWbf0AiTGGsDWKwp9YAJdHR0mCoPXqBGccTeyLG4ZyrWyyV___mUj_DRF_H6Yg9eOSJT2NNnwvVKWB4gXFeHcr9DaZ1D1l1uFJc757TEqj4bVmzinHjwvF3GnVhwl-tiXdGE1b8BwR9oaJjEmJKmHjysbaHlDY6JZwnKY9ixkg7zuiv57LyCN6fY3JzanQeNPW0f_QrJHLQG9zcpPv4H2idwwybIYV2lvw89q_L6qU1CV_KZcyw_AZgugAI priority: 102 providerName: Unpaywall |
| Title | Analysis of energy-based algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2105-13-22 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22296803 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1013765618 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1012210221 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1328507419 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3347993 https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/1471-2105-13-22 https://doaj.org/article/bf62862faf8f4f17887be06a9638379d |
| UnpaywallVersion | publishedVersion |
| Volume | 13 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVADU databaseName: BioMed Central Open Access Free customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: RBZ dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/ providerName: BioMedCentral – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 20000701 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVEBS databaseName: Academic Search Ultimate customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: ABDBF dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn providerName: EBSCOhost – providerCode: PRVEBS databaseName: Inspec with Full Text customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: ADMLS dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ebsco.com/products/research-databases/inspec-full-text providerName: EBSCOhost – providerCode: PRVBFR databaseName: Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: DIK dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com providerName: Flying Publisher – providerCode: PRVFQY databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: GX1 dateStart: 0 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVAQN databaseName: PubMed Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: RPM dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ providerName: National Library of Medicine – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: 8FG dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVFZP databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 20250131 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: M48 dateStart: 20000701 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://journals.scholarsportal.info providerName: Scholars Portal – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: HAS SpringerNature Open Access 2022 customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: AAJSJ dateStart: 20001201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.springernature.com providerName: Springer Nature – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: C6C dateStart: 20000112 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.springeropen.com/ providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3db9MwELdgEwIeEN8ERhUQEuwhI1914geEsmplVFo1dVQqT5Yd292kkpS0FfS_5y5JswY2EC-tFJ-r6L6vPv-OkDdxECoRGs8JqCedUKfMgTiuHBVSX8WMqrCcsXQypMfjcDDpTi7HAdUMXFxZ2uE8qXExO_j5ff0RDP5DafAxfe-Bg3WgdOk6XuD44I93IUwxnONwEl4eKSB4f43tc8WmVlgq0fv_9NFbQer3BsrmFPUuub3K5mL9Q8xmW4Gqf5_cqzNMO6lU4gG5obOH5FY1c3L9iAw2MCR2bmxd3vxzMJQpW8ymeXGxPP-2sCGTtUfDxF5guaxEsbYrnNlVoe15gWc7KM_HZNw_-tI7duqBCk4a-fHSETpQTLhUSa27YMuGegYh2F0tU2aECGgaIhyLJxlks0pIP4xk6lKpIg2eQQVPyE6WZ_oZsbXwTCyZFtLToRtIqXBeGTPSGCmB1iIHG37ytEYbx6EXM15WHTHlKACOAuBewH3fIu-aDfMKaON60kMUUEOGCNnlg7yY8trguDR46dY3wsQGdBGbJqV2qUCHE0RMWeQ1ipcjBkaGTTZTsVos-OezEU_w8BVx87oWeVsTmRzePhX1nQXgAcJmtSj3WpRgpGl7eaNFfKPj2F0H7h0S2Ngir5pl3ImNb5nOVyWNX1bl3l9oAj_uYmrILPK0UsyGNziuncYoj6ilsi3mtVeyi_MSZjzAS8YMdu5vlHv71a-RzH6j_f-S4vP_-N0X5A4kqn7VLb9HdkDl9UtIBpeyQ25Gkwg-4_6nDtlNksHZAL4Pj4anI3jao71O-TdLp3QGsDIeniZffwH6SF9s |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Jb9QwFLZKESocEDuBAgGBoAfD2M5kOSA0LNVMlzmUVpqbsWN7ijQkwyyq5k_xG3kvGxNQy6nX-DmK3v7i5-8R8jIWgVGBY1SETNPApgmFOG6oCUJu4iQ0QTFj6XAY9k-CvVF3tEF-1XdhsK2y9omFozZ5iv_IwboZ2AJE-_jD9CfFqVF4ulqP0CjVYt-uzqBkm78ffAb5vuJ898vxpz6tpgrQNOLxgiorTKI6odHWdkGhXcgc4pB3rE4Tp5QI0wAxSZhOIKUzSvMg0mkn1CayYB5GwHuvkKuBAF8C9hONmgKP4XyACj6IxeE7Bo6fQknVpUxQzluRrxgQ8G8YWIuDf_doNge1N8jWMpuq1ZmaTNZi4e4tcrNKYv1eqXW3yYbN7pBr5VjL1V2yVyOd-LnzbXG5kGK0NL6ajIGni9Mfcx-SZf9o2PPnWJEbNVv5JZTtcmb96QyPj1Bl7pGTS-HufbKZ5Zl9SHyrmIt1YpVmNugIrQ2OREucdk5roPXI25qfMq0AzXGuxkQWhU0cShSARAFIJiTnHnnTbJiWWB7nk35EATVkCMJdPMhnY1nZtNQO7_Vyp1zsQN2xL1PbTqjQp4koMR55geKVCLORYR_PWC3nczn4eiR7eL6L0Hxdj7yuiFwOX5-q6loE8ACRuVqU2y1K8ANpe7nWIln5obn8YzUeed4s407srctsvixoeFH4swtoBI-7mH0mHnlQKmbDG5wIH8Yoj6ilsi3mtVey76cFkrnAe8wJ7NyplXv908-RzE6j_f-T4qOLWfKMbPWPDw_kwWC4_5hch1SYl_3422QTNN4-gXRzoZ8WNu6Tb5ftVH4DAKePVw |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3db9MwELfQEF8PiK9BYIBBSLAHs9pOnOSxFKptQIUGk_Zm2bHdTSpJlbRC_e_x5UsNMBCv8TmyfJ_W3f0OoVcJD40KHSVcUE1Cm6XE-3FDTCiYSVJhwnrG0ueZODwNj8-is7Y2p-qq3buUZNPTAChN-epgaVyj4ok4oN6kEv9YiQjlhHkLfDX0rg0GGEzEpE8iAFx_i-bzh00DR1Tj9f9ulbfc0q8lk33e9Ba6sc6XavNDLRZbrml6B91uY0o8boTgLrpi83voWjNlcnMfHXfAI7hw2Na9fgScl8FqMS_Ki9X59wr72BWfzMa4ggeyUeUGN8iy69LiZQnZHODgA3Q6_fBtckjaEQoki1myIspyk6qRMNrayGuvE9QB6PrI6ix1SnGRhQDAQnXq41ejNAtjnY2ENrH1tsDwXbSTF7l9hLBV1CU6tUpTG4641gYmlKVOO6e1pw3Q2-4-Zdbii8OYi4Ws3xmJkMAACQyQlEvGAvSm37BsoDUuJ30HDOrJABO7_lCUc9mqmNQO2myZUy5xXvqgTFLbkVBgYnicmgC9BPZKQL3IoaxmrtZVJY--nsgxpFsBKS8K0OuWyBX-9JlquxT8HQBQ1oByb0Dp1TIbLndSJFuzUEE9nTfoPmRNAvSiX4adUOqW22Jd07D6HU7_QsNZEkEwmAboYSOY_d3AgHaRAD_igcgOLm-4kl-c18DiHNqKU79zvxPu7aNfwpn9Xvr_xcXH__Hf5-j6l_dT-elo9vEJuumjVNaUyu-hHS_99qmPBFf6Wa3vPwH4OVOi |
| linkToUnpaywall | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwED9NnRDwwPcgMFBASLAHd02cuMljQUxjEgUNKo0ny47trqJLqrQVKn89vsSJmsFASLzWZ8m5b9d3vwN4mdBIicgEhLJAkkhnKbFxXBEVsVAlKVNRNWPpw5gdT6KTs_hsBz42vTDyIpOzwoGGIlBxf7sNfV53OeAUBV0eLpSpjT5hh4F1ssReX2ISUBJan7zLYpuc92B3Mv40-lr1GDkKB_Dzm12d2FRB-P_qqLci1eUqyvYp9SZcX-cLsfku5vOtaHV0GxbNd9ZFKt_665XsZz8uQUD-R0bcgVsus_VHtSrehR2d34Nr9azLzX04aeBP_ML4uuo4JBhClS_m06Kcrc4vlr49hn86HvlLvKYrUW78Gt92XWp_UeKbEurRA5gcvfvy9pi4QQ4kG4bJighNVSoGTEmtY-tDDAsMQr8PtMxSIwRlWYQwMIFMbRathAyjocwGTKqhth5J0T3o5UWuH4GvRWASmWohAx0NqJQK56SlRhojpaX1oN-IkGcO5RyHbcx5ddtJGEcGcWQQDygPQw9etxsWNcDH1aRvUCdaMkTmrn4oyil3hs6lwWbf0AiTGGsDWKwp9YAJdHR0mCoPXqBGccTeyLG4ZyrWyyV___mUj_DRF_H6Yg9eOSJT2NNnwvVKWB4gXFeHcr9DaZ1D1l1uFJc757TEqj4bVmzinHjwvF3GnVhwl-tiXdGE1b8BwR9oaJjEmJKmHjysbaHlDY6JZwnKY9ixkg7zuiv57LyCN6fY3JzanQeNPW0f_QrJHLQG9zcpPv4H2idwwybIYV2lvw89q_L6qU1CV_KZcyw_AZgugAI |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis+of+energy-based+algorithms+for+RNA+secondary+structure+prediction&rft.jtitle=BMC+bioinformatics&rft.au=Hajiaghayi%2C+Monir&rft.au=Condon%2C+Anne&rft.au=Hoos%2C+Holger+H&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2105&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1471-2105-13-22&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_1471_2105_13_22 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |