Analysis of energy-based algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction

Background RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA seco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC bioinformatics Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 22
Main Authors Hajiaghayi, Monir, Condon, Anne, Hoos, Holger H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 01.02.2012
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1471-2105
1471-2105
DOI10.1186/1471-2105-13-22

Cover

Abstract Background RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters. Results We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived). Conclusions Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets.
AbstractList Background RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters. Results We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived). Conclusions Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets.
Doc number: 22 Abstract Background: RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters. Results: We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived). Conclusions: Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets.
Abstract Background RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters. Results We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived). Conclusions Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets.
RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters. We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived). Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets.
RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters. We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived). Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets.
Background: RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters. Results: We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived). Conclusions: Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets.
RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters.BACKGROUNDRNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function depends in large part on its folded structures, much effort has been invested in developing accurate methods for prediction of RNA secondary structure from the base sequence. Minimum free energy (MFE) predictions are widely used, based on nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters of Mathews, Turner et al. or those of Andronescu et al. Some recently proposed alternatives that leverage partition function calculations find the structure with maximum expected accuracy (MEA) or pseudo-expected accuracy (pseudo-MEA) methods. Advances in prediction methods are typically benchmarked using sensitivity, positive predictive value and their harmonic mean, namely F-measure, on datasets of known reference structures. Since such benchmarks document progress in improving accuracy of computational prediction methods, it is important to understand how measures of accuracy vary as a function of the reference datasets and whether advances in algorithms or thermodynamic parameters yield statistically significant improvements. Our work advances such understanding for the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based methods, with respect to the latest datasets and energy parameters.We present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived).RESULTSWe present three main findings. First, using the bootstrap percentile method, we show that the average F-measure accuracy of the MFE and (pseudo-)MEA-based algorithms, as measured on our largest datasets with over 2000 RNAs from diverse families, is a reliable estimate (within a 2% range with high confidence) of the accuracy of a population of RNA molecules represented by this set. However, average accuracy on smaller classes of RNAs such as a class of 89 Group I introns used previously in benchmarking algorithm accuracy is not reliable enough to draw meaningful conclusions about the relative merits of the MFE and MEA-based algorithms. Second, on our large datasets, the algorithm with best overall accuracy is a pseudo MEA-based algorithm of Hamada et al. that uses a generalized centroid estimator of base pairs. However, between MFE and other MEA-based methods, there is no clear winner in the sense that the relative accuracy of the MFE versus MEA-based algorithms changes depending on the underlying energy parameters. Third, of the four parameter sets we considered, the best accuracy for the MFE-, MEA-based, and pseudo-MEA-based methods is 0.686, 0.680, and 0.711, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 1 with 1 meaning perfect structure predictions) and is obtained with a thermodynamic parameter set obtained by Andronescu et al. called BL* (named after the Boltzmann likelihood method by which the parameters were derived).Large datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets.CONCLUSIONSLarge datasets should be used to obtain reliable measures of the accuracy of RNA structure prediction algorithms, and average accuracies on specific classes (such as Group I introns and Transfer RNAs) should be interpreted with caution, considering the relatively small size of currently available datasets for such classes. The accuracy of the MEA-based methods is significantly higher when using the BL* parameter set of Andronescu et al. than when using the parameters of Mathews and Turner, and there is no significant difference between the accuracy of MEA-based methods and MFE when using the BL* parameters. The pseudo-MEA-based method of Hamada et al. with the BL* parameter set significantly outperforms all other MFE and MEA-based algorithms on our large data sets.
ArticleNumber 22
Audience Academic
Author Condon, Anne
Hajiaghayi, Monir
Hoos, Holger H
AuthorAffiliation 1 Computer Science Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Computer Science Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Monir
  surname: Hajiaghayi
  fullname: Hajiaghayi, Monir
  email: monirh@cs.ubc.ca
  organization: Computer Science Department, University of British Columbia
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Anne
  surname: Condon
  fullname: Condon, Anne
  organization: Computer Science Department, University of British Columbia
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Holger H
  surname: Hoos
  fullname: Hoos, Holger H
  organization: Computer Science Department, University of British Columbia
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22296803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFks1v1DAQxSNURD_gzA1F4gKHtP5IHPuCtKooLKpAKnC2HGecepW1FzuB7n-P011Wu1VFFUWxJr_3Mnkzp9mR8w6y7DVG5xhzdoHLGhcEo6rAtCDkWXayqxztnY-z0xgXCOGao-pFdkwIEYwjepJ9mTnVr6ONuTc5OAjdumhUhDZXfeeDHW6XMTc-5DdfZ3kE7V2rwjqPQxj1MAbIVwFaqwfr3cvsuVF9hFfb51n28-rjj8vPxfW3T_PL2XWha8KHQgFthUKsbQAqzKlh2CAiOIJGC6MUZbpkmFDcCI6bVjWkrBuNWNPWUCPa0rNsvvFtvVrIVbDL1JH0ysr7gg-dVGGwugfZGEY4I0YZbkqT_p7XDSCmBKOc1mLyQhuv0a3U-o_q-50hRnKKWE4hyilEiakkJEk-bCSrsVlCq8ENQfUHfRy-cfZWdv63pLSshaDJ4N3WIPhfI8RBLm3U0PfKgR9j-gzhFapLLJ5GESaptXQn9O0DdOHHkIZ7T9GaVSyFvaM6leKxzvjUop5M5YxwgURJyypR549Q6WphadMKgLGpfiB4fyBIzAB3Q6fGGOX8-80h-2Y_v11w_3YyAdUG0MHHGMBIbQc1bVjqwvb_GczFA93To9xOPybSdRD2M3tc8hcauw7O
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_bioinformatics_bty765
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_imu_2021_100569
crossref_primary_10_53433_yyufbed_1256154
crossref_primary_10_1093_bioinformatics_bty420
crossref_primary_10_1093_nar_gkab716
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_022_04673_3
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0194583
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_imu_2020_100471
crossref_primary_10_1261_rna_033365_112
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12539_015_0266_9
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms23052452
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12539_014_0208_y
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12864_021_07638_7
crossref_primary_10_1017_S003358351600007X
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_14_139
crossref_primary_10_1093_nar_gks1204
crossref_primary_10_1093_bioinformatics_btx287
crossref_primary_10_1089_cmb_2024_0519
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmolb_2018_00111
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ymeth_2019_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0096759
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13015_016_0070_z
crossref_primary_10_1093_molbev_msu402
crossref_primary_10_1093_nar_gkad312
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_15_147
crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules27061936
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10924_021_02336_7
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pgen_1005668
crossref_primary_10_3390_s17091990
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_15_S9_S15
Cites_doi 10.1038/418122a
10.1093/nar/gkg614
10.1186/1471-2105-11-586
10.1006/jmbi.1999.3001
10.1261/rna.1643609
10.1261/rna.1950510
10.1186/1471-2105-9-340
10.1093/bioinformatics/btl246
10.1093/bioinformatics/btn601
10.1006/jmbi.1999.2700
10.1007/978-3-642-20036-6_48
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
COPYRIGHT 2012 BioMed Central Ltd.
2012 Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright ©2012 Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2012 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2012 Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
– notice: Copyright ©2012 Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Hajiaghayi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
ISR
3V.
7QO
7SC
7X7
7XB
88E
8AL
8AO
8FD
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
ARAPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
JQ2
K7-
K9.
L7M
LK8
L~C
L~D
M0N
M0S
M1P
M7P
P5Z
P62
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
7TM
5PM
ADTOC
UNPAY
DOA
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-13-22
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Gale In Context: Science
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Computing Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Journals
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Advanced Technologies & Computer Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central
Engineering Research Database
Proquest Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Computer Science Collection
Computer Science Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
Biological Sciences
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional
Computing Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Biological Science Database (Proquest)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
Nucleic Acids Abstracts
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content
Unpaywall
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
Computer Science Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Computer Science Collection
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
Health Research Premium Collection
Natural Science Collection
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Technology Collection
Technology Research Database
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
ProQuest Computing
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Computing (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
Nucleic Acids Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList
Publicly Available Content Database

MEDLINE


Engineering Research Database
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 5
  dbid: UNPAY
  name: Unpaywall
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Access Repository
– sequence: 6
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
EISSN 1471-2105
EndPage 22
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_bf62862faf8f4f17887be06a9638379d
10.1186/1471-2105-13-22
PMC3347993
2661889831
A289094345
22296803
10_1186_1471_2105_13_22
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2VQ
2WC
4.4
53G
5VS
6J9
7X7
88E
8AO
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AAKPC
AASML
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADMLS
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
ARAPS
AZQEC
BAPOH
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
ICD
IHR
INH
INR
IPNFZ
ISR
ITC
K6V
K7-
KQ8
LK8
M1P
M48
M7P
MK~
ML0
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
P62
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RIG
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XH6
XSB
AAYXX
CITATION
ALIPV
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QO
7SC
7XB
8AL
8FD
8FK
FR3
JQ2
K9.
L7M
L~C
L~D
M0N
P64
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
7TM
5PM
123
ADTOC
C1A
H13
UNPAY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c728t-ae3d9a06dbee5183f61f02980ebc9faa36c461231b981bdab247bc06bd7e703d3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1471-2105
IngestDate Fri Oct 03 12:38:05 EDT 2025
Sun Oct 26 03:57:39 EDT 2025
Tue Sep 30 16:32:01 EDT 2025
Mon Oct 06 18:05:43 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 12:58:58 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 05:12:51 EDT 2025
Mon Oct 20 21:54:00 EDT 2025
Mon Oct 20 16:15:37 EDT 2025
Thu Oct 16 15:01:22 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:58:33 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 04:15:21 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:13 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:27:14 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Bootstrap Percentile Method
Maximum Expected Accuracy
Minimum Free Energy Method
Base Pair Probability
Minimum Free Energy
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
cc-by
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c728t-ae3d9a06dbee5183f61f02980ebc9faa36c461231b981bdab247bc06bd7e703d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/1471-2105-13-22
PMID 22296803
PQID 1013765618
PQPubID 44065
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bf62862faf8f4f17887be06a9638379d
unpaywall_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_13_22
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3347993
proquest_miscellaneous_1328507419
proquest_miscellaneous_1012210221
proquest_journals_1013765618
gale_infotracmisc_A289094345
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A289094345
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A289094345
pubmed_primary_22296803
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1471_2105_13_22
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_13_22
springer_journals_10_1186_1471_2105_13_22
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2012
  text: 2012-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle BMC bioinformatics
PublicationTitleAbbrev BMC Bioinformatics
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Bioinformatics
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: Springer Nature B.V
– name: BMC
References M Hamada (5153_CR6) 2010; 11
ZJ Lu (5153_CR4) 2009; 15
B Knudsen (5153_CR7) 2003; 31
T Hesterberg (5153_CR14) 2005
5153_CR15
B Ripley (5153_CR16) 2000
M Hamada (5153_CR5) 2009; 25
C Dennis (5153_CR1) 2002; 418
DH Mathews (5153_CR3) 1999; 288
M Andronescu (5153_CR10) 2008; 9
CB Do (5153_CR8) 2006; 22
S Zakov (5153_CR11) 2011; 6577
H Varian (5153_CR13) 2005; 9
M Andronescu (5153_CR9) 2010; 16
E Eden (5153_CR12) 2005
I Tinoco (5153_CR2) 1999; 293
16873527 - Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 15;22(14):e90-8
21118522 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:586
20940338 - RNA. 2010 Dec;16(12):2304-18
19095700 - Bioinformatics. 2009 Feb 15;25(4):465-73
23617269 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:139
10550208 - J Mol Biol. 1999 Oct 22;293(2):271-81
10329189 - J Mol Biol. 1999 May 21;288(5):911-40
19703939 - RNA. 2009 Oct;15(10):1805-13
18700982 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:340
22035327 - J Comput Biol. 2011 Nov;18(11):1525-42
12110860 - Nature. 2002 Jul 11;418(6894):122-4
12824339 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3423-8
References_xml – volume: 418
  start-page: 122
  issue: 6894
  year: 2002
  ident: 5153_CR1
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/418122a
– volume: 31
  start-page: 3423
  issue: 13
  year: 2003
  ident: 5153_CR7
  publication-title: Nucleic Acids Research
  doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg614
– volume: 11
  start-page: 586
  year: 2010
  ident: 5153_CR6
  publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-586
– volume-title: SimTree: A Tool for Computing Similarity Between RNA Secondary Structures
  year: 2005
  ident: 5153_CR12
– volume: 293
  start-page: 271
  issue: 2
  year: 1999
  ident: 5153_CR2
  publication-title: Journal of Molecular Biology
  doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3001
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1805
  issue: 10
  year: 2009
  ident: 5153_CR4
  publication-title: RNA
  doi: 10.1261/rna.1643609
– volume: 16
  start-page: 2304
  issue: 12
  year: 2010
  ident: 5153_CR9
  publication-title: RNA
  doi: 10.1261/rna.1950510
– volume: 9
  start-page: 340
  year: 2008
  ident: 5153_CR10
  publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-340
– ident: 5153_CR15
– volume: 9
  start-page: 768
  issue: 4
  year: 2005
  ident: 5153_CR13
  publication-title: Mathematica Journal
– volume-title: The R Project for Statistical Computing
  year: 2000
  ident: 5153_CR16
– volume: 22
  start-page: e90
  issue: 14
  year: 2006
  ident: 5153_CR8
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl246
– volume: 25
  start-page: 465
  year: 2009
  ident: 5153_CR5
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn601
– volume-title: Bootstrap methods and permutation tests
  year: 2005
  ident: 5153_CR14
– volume: 288
  start-page: 911
  issue: 5
  year: 1999
  ident: 5153_CR3
  publication-title: Journal of Molecular Biology
  doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2700
– volume: 6577
  start-page: 546
  year: 2011
  ident: 5153_CR11
  publication-title: Research in Computational Molecular Biology
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-20036-6_48
– reference: 20940338 - RNA. 2010 Dec;16(12):2304-18
– reference: 23617269 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:139
– reference: 16873527 - Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 15;22(14):e90-8
– reference: 19095700 - Bioinformatics. 2009 Feb 15;25(4):465-73
– reference: 19703939 - RNA. 2009 Oct;15(10):1805-13
– reference: 22035327 - J Comput Biol. 2011 Nov;18(11):1525-42
– reference: 10550208 - J Mol Biol. 1999 Oct 22;293(2):271-81
– reference: 12110860 - Nature. 2002 Jul 11;418(6894):122-4
– reference: 10329189 - J Mol Biol. 1999 May 21;288(5):911-40
– reference: 12824339 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3423-8
– reference: 18700982 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:340
– reference: 21118522 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:586
SSID ssj0017805
Score 2.2169018
Snippet Background RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA...
RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA function...
Background RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA...
Doc number: 22 Abstract Background: RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis...
Background: RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins. Since RNA...
Abstract Background RNA molecules play critical roles in the cells of organisms, including roles in gene regulation, catalysis, and synthesis of proteins....
SourceID doaj
unpaywall
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 22
SubjectTerms Accuracy
Algorithms
Benchmarks
Bioinformatics
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Catalysis
Computational Biology/Bioinformatics
Computer Appl. in Life Sciences
Confidence intervals
Gene expression
Genetics
Life Sciences
Methodology
Methodology Article
Microarrays
Nucleic Acid Conformation
Predictive Value of Tests
Protein folding
Ribonuclease P - chemistry
Ribonucleic acid
RNA
RNA - chemistry
Statistical methods
Structural analysis
Structure
Studies
Synthesis
Thermodynamics
Transfer RNA
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQJQQcKt6kFGQQEvRgGtuJYx8XRFUq0UOhUm-WHdttpSVZbXaF9t_jyUsbUOmFazyOkpnxPOSZbxB6J3nmTBYo4YJakvlSkejHHXGZYE4q4bJ2xtK3U3F8np1c5Bdbo76gJqyDB-4Yd2gDNE-yYIIM8Z1Q_GZ9KgwoDi-UA-ubSjUkU_39ASD1t31FBSUxqcl7UB8qxeH4jFBOGJv4oxa2_2_jvOWd_qycHK9PH6B762phNr_MfL7loY4eot0-tMSz7pceoTu-eozudsMmN0_QyYA_guuAfdvyR8CHOWzml_XyenX1s8ExhMVnpzPcQJ7szHKDO4DZ9dLjxRIudUCQT9H50Zcfn49JP0mBlAWTK2I8d8qkwlnv83iIg6ABsNdTb0sVjOGizACHhVoVw1hnLMsKW6bCusJHk-D4M7RT1ZV_gbA3NEirvLHUZym31sGgMhVsCNZG2gR9HPipyx5mHKZdzHWbbkihQQAaBKAp14wl6MO4YdEhbNxM-gkENJIBNHb7ICqM7hVG36YwCXoL4tUAflFBdc2lWTeN_vr9TM_g1hUA8_IEve-JQh2_vjR9s0LkAeBlTSj3J5TxdJbT5UGLdG8dGiiri3Y9Rq4yQW_GZdgJFW-Vr9ctDWvTcfoPGs5kDjGhStDzTjFH3sCcdiFBHsVEZSfMm65U11ctvjiH7mIVdx4Myr396TdI5mDU_tukuPc_pPgS3Y-hK-vq5_fRTjwL_lUMD1f2dWsJfgPre1uy
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3db9QwDLfGTYjxgPimMFBBSLCHQJP00vYBoRvaNCZxQgeT9hYlTXKbdLTHfQjdf0_cL66gjdfGkVrbsZ3a_hngdcpjo2JHCRdUk9jmGfF-3BATC2bSTJi4mrH0ZSxOzuLT8-H5DozbXhgsq2xtYmWoTZnjP3J_uqk_C97bpx_nPwlOjcLsajtCQzWjFcyHCmLsBuwyRMYawO7h0fjrpMsrIIJ_A_BDU_GeetNMPN2QUE4Y6_mmCsL_X0O95an-rqLsUqm34da6mKvNLzWbbXmr47twpwkzw1GtF_dgxxb34WY9eHLzAE5bLJKwdKGt2v8I-jMTqtnUf_Xq4scy9OFsOBmPwiXemY1abMIabHa9sOF8gQkeFOpDODs--v7phDRTFUiesHRFlOUmU5Ew2lrPKu4EdYjDHlmdZ04pLvIYMVmoznxIa5RmcaLzSGiTWG8eDH8Eg6Is7BMIraIu1ZlVmto44lobHFqWOe2c1p42gHctP2XeQI7j5IuZrK4eqZAoAIkCkJRLxgJ4222Y12gbV5MeooA6MoTJrh6Ui6lsTp3UDjtvmVMudV4hsXJS20gotDo8yUwAr1C8EoEwCqy0mar1cik_f5vIEWZgETxvGMCbhsiV_u1z1TQueB4gdlaPcr9H6U9q3l9utUg2lmIp_-h1AC-7ZdyJ1W-FLdcVDauu5vQaGs7SIcaHWQCPa8XseIMz20WK8kh6KttjXn-luLyosMY5dhpnfudBq9zbr36FZA467f-fFJ9ez5JnsOcDVFZXye_DwGu5fe6DwJV-0Zzs32-6V-A
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  dbid: C6C
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELZQEQIOiDeBggxCgh5c4jhxnONSUZVK9FCo1Jtlx3ZbaUlW-xDaf8-Mk402QEFc43FkeZ7WzHxDyFslcmfywJmQ3LLc1xUDP-6Yy2XmVCVdHmcsfTmRR2f58Xlx3oMkYS_Mdv6eK_mBg_Fk8CwpGBcsA1t7EzyUjFlZeTCkCxCYv8ft-cOmkcuJyPy_298tB_RrceSQIb1Lbq-amVn_MNPplhM6vE_u9dEjnXTsfkBu-OYhudXNk1w_IscbiBHaBupjVx9DN-WomV6086vl5fcFhSiVnp5M6AKfws7M17TDkF3NPZ3NMW-DvHpMzg4_fTs4Yv2wBFaXmVoy44WrTCqd9b4APQ2SB4RXT72tq2CMkHWOUCvcVhCpOmOzvLR1Kq0rPWi9E0_ITtM2_hmh3vCgbOWN5T5PhbUOZ5FVwYZgLdAmZH9zn7rukcRxoMVUxxeFkhoZoJEBmgudZQl5P2yYdSAa15N-RAYNZIh-HT-AUOhembQN2FCbBRNUADnDgkjrU2nQmIiycgl5g-zViG_RYAHNhVktFvrz11M9wcQqYuIVCXnXE4UWTl-bvh8B7gAhsUaUuyNKUMB6vLyRIt0bgAVWzoHphuBUJeT1sIw7sait8e0q0mTxxc3_QiMyVWDYVyXkaSeYw93gKHapkB_lSGRHlzdeaa4uI4S4wAbiCnbubYR7--jXcGZvkP5_cfH5f_z3BbkDQWjWVcLvkh0Qef8SAr2lfRWV_CdxdUhs
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
– databaseName: Unpaywall
  dbid: UNPAY
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwED9NnRDwwPcgMFBASLAHd02cuMljQUxjEgUNKo0ny47trqJLqrQVKn89vsSJmsFASLzWZ8m5b9d3vwN4mdBIicgEhLJAkkhnKbFxXBEVsVAlKVNRNWPpw5gdT6KTs_hsBz42vTDyIpOzwoGGIlBxf7sNfV53OeAUBV0eLpSpjT5hh4F1ssReX2ISUBJan7zLYpuc92B3Mv40-lr1GDkKB_Dzm12d2FRB-P_qqLci1eUqyvYp9SZcX-cLsfku5vOtaHV0GxbNd9ZFKt_665XsZz8uQUD-R0bcgVsus_VHtSrehR2d34Nr9azLzX04aeBP_ML4uuo4JBhClS_m06Kcrc4vlr49hn86HvlLvKYrUW78Gt92XWp_UeKbEurRA5gcvfvy9pi4QQ4kG4bJighNVSoGTEmtY-tDDAsMQr8PtMxSIwRlWYQwMIFMbRathAyjocwGTKqhth5J0T3o5UWuH4GvRWASmWohAx0NqJQK56SlRhojpaX1oN-IkGcO5RyHbcx5ddtJGEcGcWQQDygPQw9etxsWNcDH1aRvUCdaMkTmrn4oyil3hs6lwWbf0AiTGGsDWKwp9YAJdHR0mCoPXqBGccTeyLG4ZyrWyyV___mUj_DRF_H6Yg9eOSJT2NNnwvVKWB4gXFeHcr9DaZ1D1l1uFJc757TEqj4bVmzinHjwvF3GnVhwl-tiXdGE1b8BwR9oaJjEmJKmHjysbaHlDY6JZwnKY9ixkg7zuiv57LyCN6fY3JzanQeNPW0f_QrJHLQG9zcpPv4H2idwwybIYV2lvw89q_L6qU1CV_KZcyw_AZgugAI
  priority: 102
  providerName: Unpaywall
Title Analysis of energy-based algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2105-13-22
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22296803
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1013765618
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1012210221
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1328507419
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3347993
https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/1471-2105-13-22
https://doaj.org/article/bf62862faf8f4f17887be06a9638379d
UnpaywallVersion publishedVersion
Volume 13
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVADU
  databaseName: BioMed Central Open Access Free
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: RBZ
  dateStart: 20000101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/
  providerName: BioMedCentral
– providerCode: PRVAFT
  databaseName: Open Access Digital Library
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: KQ8
  dateStart: 20000101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html
  providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
– providerCode: PRVAFT
  databaseName: Open Access Digital Library
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: KQ8
  dateStart: 20000701
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html
  providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20000101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVEBS
  databaseName: Academic Search Ultimate
  customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: ABDBF
  dateStart: 20000101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn
  providerName: EBSCOhost
– providerCode: PRVEBS
  databaseName: Inspec with Full Text
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: ADMLS
  dateStart: 20000101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.ebsco.com/products/research-databases/inspec-full-text
  providerName: EBSCOhost
– providerCode: PRVBFR
  databaseName: Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: DIK
  dateStart: 20000101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com
  providerName: Flying Publisher
– providerCode: PRVFQY
  databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: GX1
  dateStart: 0
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php
  providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20000101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVAQN
  databaseName: PubMed Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: RPM
  dateStart: 20000101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
  providerName: National Library of Medicine
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: 8FG
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVFZP
  databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 20250131
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: M48
  dateStart: 20000701
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://journals.scholarsportal.info
  providerName: Scholars Portal
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: HAS SpringerNature Open Access 2022
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: AAJSJ
  dateStart: 20001201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.springernature.com
  providerName: Springer Nature
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2105
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017805
  issn: 1471-2105
  databaseCode: C6C
  dateStart: 20000112
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.springeropen.com/
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3db9MwELdgEwIeEN8ERhUQEuwhI1914geEsmplVFo1dVQqT5Yd292kkpS0FfS_5y5JswY2EC-tFJ-r6L6vPv-OkDdxECoRGs8JqCedUKfMgTiuHBVSX8WMqrCcsXQypMfjcDDpTi7HAdUMXFxZ2uE8qXExO_j5ff0RDP5DafAxfe-Bg3WgdOk6XuD44I93IUwxnONwEl4eKSB4f43tc8WmVlgq0fv_9NFbQer3BsrmFPUuub3K5mL9Q8xmW4Gqf5_cqzNMO6lU4gG5obOH5FY1c3L9iAw2MCR2bmxd3vxzMJQpW8ymeXGxPP-2sCGTtUfDxF5guaxEsbYrnNlVoe15gWc7KM_HZNw_-tI7duqBCk4a-fHSETpQTLhUSa27YMuGegYh2F0tU2aECGgaIhyLJxlks0pIP4xk6lKpIg2eQQVPyE6WZ_oZsbXwTCyZFtLToRtIqXBeGTPSGCmB1iIHG37ytEYbx6EXM15WHTHlKACOAuBewH3fIu-aDfMKaON60kMUUEOGCNnlg7yY8trguDR46dY3wsQGdBGbJqV2qUCHE0RMWeQ1ipcjBkaGTTZTsVos-OezEU_w8BVx87oWeVsTmRzePhX1nQXgAcJmtSj3WpRgpGl7eaNFfKPj2F0H7h0S2Ngir5pl3ImNb5nOVyWNX1bl3l9oAj_uYmrILPK0UsyGNziuncYoj6ilsi3mtVeyi_MSZjzAS8YMdu5vlHv71a-RzH6j_f-S4vP_-N0X5A4kqn7VLb9HdkDl9UtIBpeyQ25Gkwg-4_6nDtlNksHZAL4Pj4anI3jao71O-TdLp3QGsDIeniZffwH6SF9s
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Jb9QwFLZKESocEDuBAgGBoAfD2M5kOSA0LNVMlzmUVpqbsWN7ijQkwyyq5k_xG3kvGxNQy6nX-DmK3v7i5-8R8jIWgVGBY1SETNPApgmFOG6oCUJu4iQ0QTFj6XAY9k-CvVF3tEF-1XdhsK2y9omFozZ5iv_IwboZ2AJE-_jD9CfFqVF4ulqP0CjVYt-uzqBkm78ffAb5vuJ898vxpz6tpgrQNOLxgiorTKI6odHWdkGhXcgc4pB3rE4Tp5QI0wAxSZhOIKUzSvMg0mkn1CayYB5GwHuvkKuBAF8C9hONmgKP4XyACj6IxeE7Bo6fQknVpUxQzluRrxgQ8G8YWIuDf_doNge1N8jWMpuq1ZmaTNZi4e4tcrNKYv1eqXW3yYbN7pBr5VjL1V2yVyOd-LnzbXG5kGK0NL6ajIGni9Mfcx-SZf9o2PPnWJEbNVv5JZTtcmb96QyPj1Bl7pGTS-HufbKZ5Zl9SHyrmIt1YpVmNugIrQ2OREucdk5roPXI25qfMq0AzXGuxkQWhU0cShSARAFIJiTnHnnTbJiWWB7nk35EATVkCMJdPMhnY1nZtNQO7_Vyp1zsQN2xL1PbTqjQp4koMR55geKVCLORYR_PWC3nczn4eiR7eL6L0Hxdj7yuiFwOX5-q6loE8ACRuVqU2y1K8ANpe7nWIln5obn8YzUeed4s407srctsvixoeFH4swtoBI-7mH0mHnlQKmbDG5wIH8Yoj6ilsi3mtVey76cFkrnAe8wJ7NyplXv908-RzE6j_f-T4qOLWfKMbPWPDw_kwWC4_5hch1SYl_3422QTNN4-gXRzoZ8WNu6Tb5ftVH4DAKePVw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3db9MwELfQEF8PiK9BYIBBSLAHs9pOnOSxFKptQIUGk_Zm2bHdTSpJlbRC_e_x5UsNMBCv8TmyfJ_W3f0OoVcJD40KHSVcUE1Cm6XE-3FDTCiYSVJhwnrG0ueZODwNj8-is7Y2p-qq3buUZNPTAChN-epgaVyj4ok4oN6kEv9YiQjlhHkLfDX0rg0GGEzEpE8iAFx_i-bzh00DR1Tj9f9ulbfc0q8lk33e9Ba6sc6XavNDLRZbrml6B91uY0o8boTgLrpi83voWjNlcnMfHXfAI7hw2Na9fgScl8FqMS_Ki9X59wr72BWfzMa4ggeyUeUGN8iy69LiZQnZHODgA3Q6_fBtckjaEQoki1myIspyk6qRMNrayGuvE9QB6PrI6ix1SnGRhQDAQnXq41ejNAtjnY2ENrH1tsDwXbSTF7l9hLBV1CU6tUpTG4641gYmlKVOO6e1pw3Q2-4-Zdbii8OYi4Ws3xmJkMAACQyQlEvGAvSm37BsoDUuJ30HDOrJABO7_lCUc9mqmNQO2myZUy5xXvqgTFLbkVBgYnicmgC9BPZKQL3IoaxmrtZVJY--nsgxpFsBKS8K0OuWyBX-9JlquxT8HQBQ1oByb0Dp1TIbLndSJFuzUEE9nTfoPmRNAvSiX4adUOqW22Jd07D6HU7_QsNZEkEwmAboYSOY_d3AgHaRAD_igcgOLm-4kl-c18DiHNqKU79zvxPu7aNfwpn9Xvr_xcXH__Hf5-j6l_dT-elo9vEJuumjVNaUyu-hHS_99qmPBFf6Wa3vPwH4OVOi
linkToUnpaywall http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwED9NnRDwwPcgMFBASLAHd02cuMljQUxjEgUNKo0ny47trqJLqrQVKn89vsSJmsFASLzWZ8m5b9d3vwN4mdBIicgEhLJAkkhnKbFxXBEVsVAlKVNRNWPpw5gdT6KTs_hsBz42vTDyIpOzwoGGIlBxf7sNfV53OeAUBV0eLpSpjT5hh4F1ssReX2ISUBJan7zLYpuc92B3Mv40-lr1GDkKB_Dzm12d2FRB-P_qqLci1eUqyvYp9SZcX-cLsfku5vOtaHV0GxbNd9ZFKt_665XsZz8uQUD-R0bcgVsus_VHtSrehR2d34Nr9azLzX04aeBP_ML4uuo4JBhClS_m06Kcrc4vlr49hn86HvlLvKYrUW78Gt92XWp_UeKbEurRA5gcvfvy9pi4QQ4kG4bJighNVSoGTEmtY-tDDAsMQr8PtMxSIwRlWYQwMIFMbRathAyjocwGTKqhth5J0T3o5UWuH4GvRWASmWohAx0NqJQK56SlRhojpaX1oN-IkGcO5RyHbcx5ddtJGEcGcWQQDygPQw9etxsWNcDH1aRvUCdaMkTmrn4oyil3hs6lwWbf0AiTGGsDWKwp9YAJdHR0mCoPXqBGccTeyLG4ZyrWyyV___mUj_DRF_H6Yg9eOSJT2NNnwvVKWB4gXFeHcr9DaZ1D1l1uFJc757TEqj4bVmzinHjwvF3GnVhwl-tiXdGE1b8BwR9oaJjEmJKmHjysbaHlDY6JZwnKY9ixkg7zuiv57LyCN6fY3JzanQeNPW0f_QrJHLQG9zcpPv4H2idwwybIYV2lvw89q_L6qU1CV_KZcyw_AZgugAI
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis+of+energy-based+algorithms+for+RNA+secondary+structure+prediction&rft.jtitle=BMC+bioinformatics&rft.au=Hajiaghayi%2C+Monir&rft.au=Condon%2C+Anne&rft.au=Hoos%2C+Holger+H&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2105&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1471-2105-13-22&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_1471_2105_13_22
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon