Influence of a Locomotor Training Approach on Walking Speed and Distance in People With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial

• Published in: Physical therapy Vol. 91; no. 1; pp. 48 - 60
• Main Authors: Field-Fote, Edelle C., Roach, Kathryn E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Physical Therapy Association 01.01.2011; Oxford University Press
• Subjects: Adult; Care and treatment; Case studies; Chronic Disease; Exercise Test - methods; Exercise therapy; Exercise Therapy - methods; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Methods; Middle Aged; Movement Disorders - etiology; Movement Disorders - rehabilitation; Movement therapy; Patient outcomes; Physical Therapy Modalities; Recovery of Function; Research Reports; Robotics; Severity of Illness Index; Single-Blind Method; Spinal cord injuries; Spinal Cord Injuries - complications; Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation; Statistics, Nonparametric; Treatment Outcome; Walking; Weight-Bearing; Young Adult; United States
• ISSN: 0031-9023; 1538-6724; 1538-6724
• DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20090359

Impaired walking limits function after spinal cord injury (SCI), but training-related improvements are possible even in people with chronic motor incomplete SCI. The objective of this study was to compare changes in walking speed and distance associated with 4 locomotor training approaches. This study was a single-blind, randomized clinical trial. This study was conducted in a rehabilitation research laboratory. Participants were people with minimal walking function due to chronic SCI. Participants (n=74) trained 5 days per week for 12 weeks with the following approaches: treadmill-based training with manual assistance (TM), treadmill-based training with stimulation (TS), overground training with stimulation (OG), and treadmill-based training with robotic assistance (LR). Overground walking speed and distance were the primary outcome measures. In participants who completed the training (n=64), there were overall effects for speed (effect size index [d]=0.33) and distance (d=0.35). For speed, there were no significant between-group differences; however, distance gains were greatest with OG. Effect sizes for speed and distance were largest with OG (d=0.43 and d=0.40, respectively). Effect sizes for speed were the same for TM and TS (d=0.28); there was no effect for LR. The effect size for distance was greater with TS (d=0.16) than with TM or LR, for which there was no effect. Ten participants who improved with training were retested at least 6 months after training; walking speed at this time was slower than that at the conclusion of training but remained faster than before training. It is unknown whether the training dosage and the emphasis on training speed were optimal. Robotic training that requires active participation would likely yield different results. In people with chronic motor incomplete SCI, walking speed improved with both overground training and treadmill-based training; however, walking distance improved to a greater extent with overground training.