Effect of a Lifestyle-Focused Web-Based Application on Risk Factor Management in Patients Who Have Had a Myocardial Infarction: Randomized Controlled Trial

Cardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended cardiac rehabilitation targets is unsatisfactory. eHealth offers new possibilities to improve clinical care. This study aims to assess the effect of a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical Internet research Vol. 24; no. 3; p. e25224
Main Authors Ögmundsdóttir Michelsen, Halldóra, Sjölin, Ingela, Bäck, Maria, Gonzalez Garcia, Manuel, Olsson, Anneli, Sandberg, Camilla, Schiopu, Alexandru, Leósdóttir, Margrét
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Canada Journal of Medical Internet Research 31.03.2022
Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor
JMIR Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1438-8871
1439-4456
1438-8871
DOI10.2196/25224

Cover

Abstract Cardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended cardiac rehabilitation targets is unsatisfactory. eHealth offers new possibilities to improve clinical care. This study aims to assess the effect of a web-based application designed to support adherence to lifestyle advice and self-control of risk factors (intervention) in addition to center-based cardiac rehabilitation, compared with cardiac rehabilitation only (usual care). All 150 patients participated in cardiac rehabilitation. Patients randomized to the intervention group (n=101) received access to the application for 25 weeks where information about lifestyle (eg, diet and physical activity), risk factors (eg, weight and blood pressure [BP]), and symptoms could be registered. The software provided feedback and lifestyle advice. The primary outcome was a change in submaximal exercise capacity (Watts [W]) between follow-up visits. Secondary outcomes included changes in modifiable risk factors between baseline and follow-up visits and uptake and adherence to the application. Regression analysis was used, adjusting for relevant baseline variables. There was a nonsignificant trend toward a larger change in exercise capacity in the intervention group (n=66) compared with the usual care group (n=40; +14.4, SD 19.0 W, vs +10.3, SD 16.1 W; P=.22). Patients in the intervention group achieved significantly larger BP reduction compared with usual care patients at 2 weeks (systolic -27.7 vs -16.4 mm Hg; P=.006) and at 6 to 10 weeks (systolic -25.3 vs -16.4 mm Hg; P=.02, and diastolic -13.4 vs -9.1 mm Hg; P=.05). A healthy diet index score improved significantly more between baseline and the 2-week follow-up in the intervention group (+2.3 vs +1.4 points; P=.05), mostly owing to an increase in the consumption of fish and fruit. At 6 to 10 weeks, 64% (14/22) versus 46% (5/11) of smokers in the intervention versus usual care groups had quit smoking, and at 12 to 14 months, the respective percentages were 55% (12/22) versus 36% (4/11). However, the number of smokers in the study was low (33/149, 21.9%), and the differences were nonsignificant. Attendance in cardiac rehabilitation was high, with 96% (96/100) of patients in the intervention group and 98% (48/49) of patients receiving usual care only attending 12- to 14-month follow-up. Uptake (logging data in the application at least once) was 86.1% (87/101). Adherence (logging data at least twice weekly) was 91% (79/87) in week 1 and 56% (49/87) in week 25. Complementing cardiac rehabilitation with a web-based application improved BP and dietary habits during the first months after myocardial infarction. A nonsignificant tendency toward better exercise capacity and higher smoking cessation rates was observed. Although the study group was small, these positive trends support further development of eHealth in cardiac rehabilitation. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03260582; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03260582. RR2-10.1186/s13063-018-3118-1.
AbstractList Cardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended cardiac rehabilitation targets is unsatisfactory. eHealth offers new possibilities to improve clinical care. This study aims to assess the effect of a web-based application designed to support adherence to lifestyle advice and self-control of risk factors (intervention) in addition to center-based cardiac rehabilitation, compared with cardiac rehabilitation only (usual care). All 150 patients participated in cardiac rehabilitation. Patients randomized to the intervention group (n=101) received access to the application for 25 weeks where information about lifestyle (eg, diet and physical activity), risk factors (eg, weight and blood pressure [BP]), and symptoms could be registered. The software provided feedback and lifestyle advice. The primary outcome was a change in submaximal exercise capacity (Watts [W]) between follow-up visits. Secondary outcomes included changes in modifiable risk factors between baseline and follow-up visits and uptake and adherence to the application. Regression analysis was used, adjusting for relevant baseline variables. There was a nonsignificant trend toward a larger change in exercise capacity in the intervention group (n=66) compared with the usual care group (n=40; +14.4, SD 19.0 W, vs +10.3, SD 16.1 W; P=.22). Patients in the intervention group achieved significantly larger BP reduction compared with usual care patients at 2 weeks (systolic −27.7 vs −16.4 mm Hg; P=.006) and at 6 to 10 weeks (systolic −25.3 vs −16.4 mm Hg; P=.02, and diastolic −13.4 vs −9.1 mm Hg; P=.05). A healthy diet index score improved significantly more between baseline and the 2-week follow-up in the intervention group (+2.3 vs +1.4 points; P=.05), mostly owing to an increase in the consumption of fish and fruit. At 6 to 10 weeks, 64% (14/22) versus 46% (5/11) of smokers in the intervention versus usual care groups had quit smoking, and at 12 to 14 months, the respective percentages were 55% (12/22) versus 36% (4/11). However, the number of smokers in the study was low (33/149, 21.9%), and the differences were nonsignificant. Attendance in cardiac rehabilitation was high, with 96% (96/100) of patients in the intervention group and 98% (48/49) of patients receiving usual care only attending 12- to 14-month follow-up. Uptake (logging data in the application at least once) was 86.1% (87/101). Adherence (logging data at least twice weekly) was 91% (79/87) in week 1 and 56% (49/87) in week 25. Complementing cardiac rehabilitation with a web-based application improved BP and dietary habits during the first months after myocardial infarction. A nonsignificant tendency toward better exercise capacity and higher smoking cessation rates was observed. Although the study group was small, these positive trends support further development of eHealth in cardiac rehabilitation.
Background: Cardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended cardiac rehabilitation targets is unsatisfactory. eHealth offers new possibilities to improve clinical care. Objective: This study aims to assess the effect of a web-based application designed to support adherence to lifestyle advice and self-control of risk factors (intervention) in addition to center-based cardiac rehabilitation, compared with cardiac rehabilitation only (usual care). Methods: All 150 patients participated in cardiac rehabilitation. Patients randomized to the intervention group (n=101) received access to the application for 25 weeks where information about lifestyle (eg, diet and physical activity), risk factors (eg, weight and blood pressure [BP]), and symptoms could be registered. The software provided feedback and lifestyle advice. The primary outcome was a change in submaximal exercise capacity (Watts [W]) between follow-up visits. Secondary outcomes included changes in modifiable risk factors between baseline and follow-up visits and uptake and adherence to the application. Regression analysis was used, adjusting for relevant baseline variables. Results: There was a nonsignificant trend toward a larger change in exercise capacity in the intervention group (n=66) compared with the usual care group (n=40; +14.4, SD 19.0 W, vs +10.3, SD 16.1 W; P=.22). Patients in the intervention group achieved significantly larger BP reduction compared with usual care patients at 2 weeks (systolic -27.7 vs -16.4 mm Hg; P=.006) and at 6 to 10 weeks (systolic -25.3 vs -16.4 mm Hg; P=.02, and diastolic -13.4 vs -9.1 mm Hg; P=.05). A healthy diet index score improved significantly more between baseline and the 2-week follow-up in the intervention group (+2.3 vs +1.4 points; P=.05), mostly owing to an increase in the consumption of fish and fruit. At 6 to 10 weeks, 64% (14/22) versus 46% (5/11) of smokers in the intervention versus usual care groups had quit smoking, and at 12 to 14 months, the respective percentages were 55% (12/22) versus 36% (4/11). However, the number of smokers in the study was low (33/149, 21.9%), and the differences were nonsignificant. Attendance in cardiac rehabilitation was high, with 96% (96/100) of patients in the intervention group and 98% (48/49) of patients receiving usual care only attending 12- to 14-month follow-up. Uptake (logging data in the application at least once) was 86.1% (87/101). Adherence (logging data at least twice weekly) was 91% (79/87) in week 1 and 56% (49/87) in week 25. Conclusions: Complementing cardiac rehabilitation with a web-based application improved BP and dietary habits during the first months after myocardial infarction. A nonsignificant tendency toward better exercise capacity and higher smoking cessation rates was observed. Although the study group was small, these positive trends support further development of eHealth in cardiac rehabilitation.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended cardiac rehabilitation targets is unsatisfactory. eHealth offers new possibilities to improve clinical care. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the effect of a web-based application designed to support adherence to lifestyle advice and self-control of risk factors (intervention) in addition to center-based cardiac rehabilitation, compared with cardiac rehabilitation only (usual care). METHODS: All 150 patients participated in cardiac rehabilitation. Patients randomized to the intervention group (n=101) received access to the application for 25 weeks where information about lifestyle (eg, diet and physical activity), risk factors (eg, weight and blood pressure [BP]), and symptoms could be registered. The software provided feedback and lifestyle advice. The primary outcome was a change in submaximal exercise capacity (Watts [W]) between follow-up visits. Secondary outcomes included changes in modifiable risk factors between baseline and follow-up visits and uptake and adherence to the application. Regression analysis was used, adjusting for relevant baseline variables. RESULTS: There was a nonsignificant trend toward a larger change in exercise capacity in the intervention group (n=66) compared with the usual care group (n=40; +14.4, SD 19.0 W, vs +10.3, SD 16.1 W; P=.22). Patients in the intervention group achieved significantly larger BP reduction compared with usual care patients at 2 weeks (systolic -27.7 vs -16.4 mm Hg; P=.006) and at 6 to 10 weeks (systolic -25.3 vs -16.4 mm Hg; P=.02, and diastolic -13.4 vs -9.1 mm Hg; P=.05). A healthy diet index score improved significantly more between baseline and the 2-week follow-up in the intervention group (+2.3 vs +1.4 points; P=.05), mostly owing to an increase in the consumption of fish and fruit. At 6 to 10 weeks, 64% (14/22) versus 46% (5/11) of smokers in the intervention versus usual care groups had quit smoking, and at 12 to 14 months, the respective percentages were 55% (12/22) versus 36% (4/11). However, the number of smokers in the study was low (33/149, 21.9%), and the differences were nonsignificant. Attendance in cardiac rehabilitation was high, with 96% (96/100) of patients in the intervention group and 98% (48/49) of patients receiving usual care only attending 12- to 14-month follow-up. Uptake (logging data in the application at least once) was 86.1% (87/101). Adherence (logging data at least twice weekly) was 91% (79/87) in week 1 and 56% (49/87) in week 25. CONCLUSIONS: Complementing cardiac rehabilitation with a web-based application improved BP and dietary habits during the first months after myocardial infarction. A nonsignificant tendency toward better exercise capacity and higher smoking cessation rates was observed. Although the study group was small, these positive trends support further development of eHealth in cardiac rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03260582; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03260582. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s13063-018-3118-1.
Cardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended cardiac rehabilitation targets is unsatisfactory. eHealth offers new possibilities to improve clinical care.BACKGROUNDCardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended cardiac rehabilitation targets is unsatisfactory. eHealth offers new possibilities to improve clinical care.This study aims to assess the effect of a web-based application designed to support adherence to lifestyle advice and self-control of risk factors (intervention) in addition to center-based cardiac rehabilitation, compared with cardiac rehabilitation only (usual care).OBJECTIVEThis study aims to assess the effect of a web-based application designed to support adherence to lifestyle advice and self-control of risk factors (intervention) in addition to center-based cardiac rehabilitation, compared with cardiac rehabilitation only (usual care).All 150 patients participated in cardiac rehabilitation. Patients randomized to the intervention group (n=101) received access to the application for 25 weeks where information about lifestyle (eg, diet and physical activity), risk factors (eg, weight and blood pressure [BP]), and symptoms could be registered. The software provided feedback and lifestyle advice. The primary outcome was a change in submaximal exercise capacity (Watts [W]) between follow-up visits. Secondary outcomes included changes in modifiable risk factors between baseline and follow-up visits and uptake and adherence to the application. Regression analysis was used, adjusting for relevant baseline variables.METHODSAll 150 patients participated in cardiac rehabilitation. Patients randomized to the intervention group (n=101) received access to the application for 25 weeks where information about lifestyle (eg, diet and physical activity), risk factors (eg, weight and blood pressure [BP]), and symptoms could be registered. The software provided feedback and lifestyle advice. The primary outcome was a change in submaximal exercise capacity (Watts [W]) between follow-up visits. Secondary outcomes included changes in modifiable risk factors between baseline and follow-up visits and uptake and adherence to the application. Regression analysis was used, adjusting for relevant baseline variables.There was a nonsignificant trend toward a larger change in exercise capacity in the intervention group (n=66) compared with the usual care group (n=40; +14.4, SD 19.0 W, vs +10.3, SD 16.1 W; P=.22). Patients in the intervention group achieved significantly larger BP reduction compared with usual care patients at 2 weeks (systolic -27.7 vs -16.4 mm Hg; P=.006) and at 6 to 10 weeks (systolic -25.3 vs -16.4 mm Hg; P=.02, and diastolic -13.4 vs -9.1 mm Hg; P=.05). A healthy diet index score improved significantly more between baseline and the 2-week follow-up in the intervention group (+2.3 vs +1.4 points; P=.05), mostly owing to an increase in the consumption of fish and fruit. At 6 to 10 weeks, 64% (14/22) versus 46% (5/11) of smokers in the intervention versus usual care groups had quit smoking, and at 12 to 14 months, the respective percentages were 55% (12/22) versus 36% (4/11). However, the number of smokers in the study was low (33/149, 21.9%), and the differences were nonsignificant. Attendance in cardiac rehabilitation was high, with 96% (96/100) of patients in the intervention group and 98% (48/49) of patients receiving usual care only attending 12- to 14-month follow-up. Uptake (logging data in the application at least once) was 86.1% (87/101). Adherence (logging data at least twice weekly) was 91% (79/87) in week 1 and 56% (49/87) in week 25.RESULTSThere was a nonsignificant trend toward a larger change in exercise capacity in the intervention group (n=66) compared with the usual care group (n=40; +14.4, SD 19.0 W, vs +10.3, SD 16.1 W; P=.22). Patients in the intervention group achieved significantly larger BP reduction compared with usual care patients at 2 weeks (systolic -27.7 vs -16.4 mm Hg; P=.006) and at 6 to 10 weeks (systolic -25.3 vs -16.4 mm Hg; P=.02, and diastolic -13.4 vs -9.1 mm Hg; P=.05). A healthy diet index score improved significantly more between baseline and the 2-week follow-up in the intervention group (+2.3 vs +1.4 points; P=.05), mostly owing to an increase in the consumption of fish and fruit. At 6 to 10 weeks, 64% (14/22) versus 46% (5/11) of smokers in the intervention versus usual care groups had quit smoking, and at 12 to 14 months, the respective percentages were 55% (12/22) versus 36% (4/11). However, the number of smokers in the study was low (33/149, 21.9%), and the differences were nonsignificant. Attendance in cardiac rehabilitation was high, with 96% (96/100) of patients in the intervention group and 98% (48/49) of patients receiving usual care only attending 12- to 14-month follow-up. Uptake (logging data in the application at least once) was 86.1% (87/101). Adherence (logging data at least twice weekly) was 91% (79/87) in week 1 and 56% (49/87) in week 25.Complementing cardiac rehabilitation with a web-based application improved BP and dietary habits during the first months after myocardial infarction. A nonsignificant tendency toward better exercise capacity and higher smoking cessation rates was observed. Although the study group was small, these positive trends support further development of eHealth in cardiac rehabilitation.CONCLUSIONSComplementing cardiac rehabilitation with a web-based application improved BP and dietary habits during the first months after myocardial infarction. A nonsignificant tendency toward better exercise capacity and higher smoking cessation rates was observed. Although the study group was small, these positive trends support further development of eHealth in cardiac rehabilitation.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03260582; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03260582.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03260582; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03260582.RR2-10.1186/s13063-018-3118-1.INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)RR2-10.1186/s13063-018-3118-1.
Background: Cardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended cardiac rehabilitation targets is unsatisfactory. eHealth offers new possibilities to improve clinical care. Objective: This study aims to assess the effect of a web-based application designed to support adherence to lifestyle advice and self-control of risk factors (intervention) in addition to center-based cardiac rehabilitation, compared with cardiac rehabilitation only (usual care). Methods: All 150 patients participated in cardiac rehabilitation. Patients randomized to the intervention group (n=101) received access to the application for 25 weeks where information about lifestyle (eg, diet and physical activity), risk factors (eg, weight and blood pressure [BP]), and symptoms could be registered. The software provided feedback and lifestyle advice. The primary outcome was a change in submaximal exercise capacity (Watts [W]) between follow-up visits. Secondary outcomes included changes in modifiable risk factors between baseline and follow-up visits and uptake and adherence to the application. Regression analysis was used, adjusting for relevant baseline variables. Results: There was a nonsignificant trend toward a larger change in exercise capacity in the intervention group (n=66) compared with the usual care group (n=40; +14.4, SD 19.0 W, vs +10.3, SD 16.1 W; P=.22). Patients in the intervention group achieved significantly larger BP reduction compared with usual care patients at 2 weeks (systolic −27.7 vs −16.4 mm Hg; P=.006) and at 6 to 10 weeks (systolic −25.3 vs −16.4 mm Hg; P=.02, and diastolic −13.4 vs −9.1 mm Hg; P=.05). A healthy diet index score improved significantly more between baseline and the 2-week follow-up in the intervention group (+2.3 vs +1.4 points; P=.05), mostly owing to an increase in the consumption of fish and fruit. At 6 to 10 weeks, 64% (14/22) versus 46% (5/11) of smokers in the intervention versus usual care groups had quit smoking, and at 12 to 14 months, the respective percentages were 55% (12/22) versus 36% (4/11). However, the number of smokers in the study was low (33/149, 21.9%), and the differences were nonsignificant. Attendance in cardiac rehabilitation was high, with 96% (96/100) of patients in the intervention group and 98% (48/49) of patients receiving usual care only attending 12- to 14-month follow-up. Uptake (logging data in the application at least once) was 86.1% (87/101). Adherence (logging data at least twice weekly) was 91% (79/87) in week 1 and 56% (49/87) in week 25. Conclusions: Complementing cardiac rehabilitation with a web-based application improved BP and dietary habits during the first months after myocardial infarction. A nonsignificant tendency toward better exercise capacity and higher smoking cessation rates was observed. Although the study group was small, these positive trends support further development of eHealth in cardiac rehabilitation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03260582; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03260582 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s13063-018-3118-1
Cardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended cardiac rehabilitation targets is unsatisfactory. eHealth offers new possibilities to improve clinical care. This study aims to assess the effect of a web-based application designed to support adherence to lifestyle advice and self-control of risk factors (intervention) in addition to center-based cardiac rehabilitation, compared with cardiac rehabilitation only (usual care). All 150 patients participated in cardiac rehabilitation. Patients randomized to the intervention group (n=101) received access to the application for 25 weeks where information about lifestyle (eg, diet and physical activity), risk factors (eg, weight and blood pressure [BP]), and symptoms could be registered. The software provided feedback and lifestyle advice. The primary outcome was a change in submaximal exercise capacity (Watts [W]) between follow-up visits. Secondary outcomes included changes in modifiable risk factors between baseline and follow-up visits and uptake and adherence to the application. Regression analysis was used, adjusting for relevant baseline variables. There was a nonsignificant trend toward a larger change in exercise capacity in the intervention group (n=66) compared with the usual care group (n=40; +14.4, SD 19.0 W, vs +10.3, SD 16.1 W; P=.22). Patients in the intervention group achieved significantly larger BP reduction compared with usual care patients at 2 weeks (systolic -27.7 vs -16.4 mm Hg; P=.006) and at 6 to 10 weeks (systolic -25.3 vs -16.4 mm Hg; P=.02, and diastolic -13.4 vs -9.1 mm Hg; P=.05). A healthy diet index score improved significantly more between baseline and the 2-week follow-up in the intervention group (+2.3 vs +1.4 points; P=.05), mostly owing to an increase in the consumption of fish and fruit. At 6 to 10 weeks, 64% (14/22) versus 46% (5/11) of smokers in the intervention versus usual care groups had quit smoking, and at 12 to 14 months, the respective percentages were 55% (12/22) versus 36% (4/11). However, the number of smokers in the study was low (33/149, 21.9%), and the differences were nonsignificant. Attendance in cardiac rehabilitation was high, with 96% (96/100) of patients in the intervention group and 98% (48/49) of patients receiving usual care only attending 12- to 14-month follow-up. Uptake (logging data in the application at least once) was 86.1% (87/101). Adherence (logging data at least twice weekly) was 91% (79/87) in week 1 and 56% (49/87) in week 25. Complementing cardiac rehabilitation with a web-based application improved BP and dietary habits during the first months after myocardial infarction. A nonsignificant tendency toward better exercise capacity and higher smoking cessation rates was observed. Although the study group was small, these positive trends support further development of eHealth in cardiac rehabilitation. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03260582; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03260582. RR2-10.1186/s13063-018-3118-1.
BackgroundCardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended cardiac rehabilitation targets is unsatisfactory. eHealth offers new possibilities to improve clinical care. ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the effect of a web-based application designed to support adherence to lifestyle advice and self-control of risk factors (intervention) in addition to center-based cardiac rehabilitation, compared with cardiac rehabilitation only (usual care). MethodsAll 150 patients participated in cardiac rehabilitation. Patients randomized to the intervention group (n=101) received access to the application for 25 weeks where information about lifestyle (eg, diet and physical activity), risk factors (eg, weight and blood pressure [BP]), and symptoms could be registered. The software provided feedback and lifestyle advice. The primary outcome was a change in submaximal exercise capacity (Watts [W]) between follow-up visits. Secondary outcomes included changes in modifiable risk factors between baseline and follow-up visits and uptake and adherence to the application. Regression analysis was used, adjusting for relevant baseline variables. ResultsThere was a nonsignificant trend toward a larger change in exercise capacity in the intervention group (n=66) compared with the usual care group (n=40; +14.4, SD 19.0 W, vs +10.3, SD 16.1 W; P=.22). Patients in the intervention group achieved significantly larger BP reduction compared with usual care patients at 2 weeks (systolic −27.7 vs −16.4 mm Hg; P=.006) and at 6 to 10 weeks (systolic −25.3 vs −16.4 mm Hg; P=.02, and diastolic −13.4 vs −9.1 mm Hg; P=.05). A healthy diet index score improved significantly more between baseline and the 2-week follow-up in the intervention group (+2.3 vs +1.4 points; P=.05), mostly owing to an increase in the consumption of fish and fruit. At 6 to 10 weeks, 64% (14/22) versus 46% (5/11) of smokers in the intervention versus usual care groups had quit smoking, and at 12 to 14 months, the respective percentages were 55% (12/22) versus 36% (4/11). However, the number of smokers in the study was low (33/149, 21.9%), and the differences were nonsignificant. Attendance in cardiac rehabilitation was high, with 96% (96/100) of patients in the intervention group and 98% (48/49) of patients receiving usual care only attending 12- to 14-month follow-up. Uptake (logging data in the application at least once) was 86.1% (87/101). Adherence (logging data at least twice weekly) was 91% (79/87) in week 1 and 56% (49/87) in week 25. ConclusionsComplementing cardiac rehabilitation with a web-based application improved BP and dietary habits during the first months after myocardial infarction. A nonsignificant tendency toward better exercise capacity and higher smoking cessation rates was observed. Although the study group was small, these positive trends support further development of eHealth in cardiac rehabilitation. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03260582; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03260582 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.1186/s13063-018-3118-1
Background Cardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended cardiac rehabilitation targets is unsatisfactory. eHealth offers new possibilities to improve clinical care. Objective This study aims to assess the effect of a web-based application designed to support adherence to lifestyle advice and self-control of risk factors (intervention) in addition to center-based cardiac rehabilitation, compared with cardiac rehabilitation only (usual care). Methods All 150 patients participated in cardiac rehabilitation. Patients randomized to the intervention group (n=101) received access to the application for 25 weeks where information about lifestyle (eg, diet and physical activity), risk factors (eg, weight and blood pressure [BP]), and symptoms could be registered. The software provided feedback and lifestyle advice. The primary outcome was a change in submaximal exercise capacity (Watts [W]) between follow-up visits. Secondary outcomes included changes in modifiable risk factors between baseline and follow-up visits and uptake and adherence to the application. Regression analysis was used, adjusting for relevant baseline variables. Results There was a nonsignificant trend toward a larger change in exercise capacity in the intervention group (n=66) compared with the usual care group (n=40; +14.4, SD 19.0 W, vs +10.3, SD 16.1 W; P=.22). Patients in the intervention group achieved significantly larger BP reduction compared with usual care patients at 2 weeks (systolic −27.7 vs −16.4 mm Hg; P=.006) and at 6 to 10 weeks (systolic −25.3 vs −16.4 mm Hg; P=.02, and diastolic −13.4 vs −9.1 mm Hg; P=.05). A healthy diet index score improved significantly more between baseline and the 2-week follow-up in the intervention group (+2.3 vs +1.4 points; P=.05), mostly owing to an increase in the consumption of fish and fruit. At 6 to 10 weeks, 64% (14/22) versus 46% (5/11) of smokers in the intervention versus usual care groups had quit smoking, and at 12 to 14 months, the respective percentages were 55% (12/22) versus 36% (4/11). However, the number of smokers in the study was low (33/149, 21.9%), and the differences were nonsignificant. Attendance in cardiac rehabilitation was high, with 96% (96/100) of patients in the intervention group and 98% (48/49) of patients receiving usual care only attending 12- to 14-month follow-up. Uptake (logging data in the application at least once) was 86.1% (87/101). Adherence (logging data at least twice weekly) was 91% (79/87) in week 1 and 56% (49/87) in week 25. Conclusions Complementing cardiac rehabilitation with a web-based application improved BP and dietary habits during the first months after myocardial infarction. A nonsignificant tendency toward better exercise capacity and higher smoking cessation rates was observed. Although the study group was small, these positive trends support further development of eHealth in cardiac rehabilitation. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03260582; International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.1186/s13063-018-3118-1
Background: Cardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended cardiac rehabilitation targets is unsatisfactory. eHealth offers new possibilities to improve clinical care. Objective: This study aims to assess the effect of a web-based application designed to support adherence to lifestyle advice and self-control of risk factors (intervention) in addition to center-based cardiac rehabilitation, compared with cardiac rehabilitation only (usual care). Methods: All 150 patients participated in cardiac rehabilitation. Patients randomized to the intervention group (n=101) received access to the application for 25 weeks where information about lifestyle (eg, diet and physical activity), risk factors (eg, weight and blood pressure [BP]), and symptoms could be registered. The software provided feedback and lifestyle advice. The primary outcome was a change in submaximal exercise capacity (Watts [W]) between follow-up visits. Secondary outcomes included changes in modifiable risk factors between baseline and follow-up visits and uptake and adherence to the application. Regression analysis was used, adjusting for relevant baseline variables. Results: There was a nonsignificant trend toward a larger change in exercise capacity in the intervention group (n=66) compared with the usual care group (n=40; +14.4, SD 19.0 W, vs +10.3, SD 16.1 W; P=.22). Patients in the intervention group achieved significantly larger BP reduction compared with usual care patients at 2 weeks (systolic −27.7 vs −16.4 mm Hg; P=.006) and at 6 to 10 weeks (systolic −25.3 vs −16.4 mm Hg; P=.02, and diastolic −13.4 vs −9.1 mm Hg; P=.05). A healthy diet index score improved significantly more between baseline and the 2-week follow-up in the intervention group (+2.3 vs +1.4 points; P=.05), mostly owing to an increase in the consumption of fish and fruit. At 6 to 10 weeks, 64% (14/22) versus 46% (5/11) of smokers in the intervention versus usual care groups had quit smoking, and at 12 to 14 months, the respective percentages were 55% (12/22) versus 36% (4/11). However, the number of smokers in the study was low (33/149, 21.9%), and the differences were nonsignificant. Attendance in cardiac rehabilitation was high, with 96% (96/100) of patients in the intervention group and 98% (48/49) of patients receiving usual care only attending 12- to 14-month follow-up. Uptake (logging data in the application at least once) was 86.1% (87/101). Adherence (logging data at least twice weekly) was 91% (79/87) in week 1 and 56% (49/87) in week 25. Conclusions: Complementing cardiac rehabilitation with a web-based application improved BP and dietary habits during the first months after myocardial infarction. A nonsignificant tendency toward better exercise capacity and higher smoking cessation rates was observed. Although the study group was small, these positive trends support further development of eHealth in cardiac rehabilitation.
Audience Academic
Author Gonzalez Garcia, Manuel
Sandberg, Camilla
Ögmundsdóttir Michelsen, Halldóra
Bäck, Maria
Sjölin, Ingela
Leósdóttir, Margrét
Olsson, Anneli
Schiopu, Alexandru
AuthorAffiliation 4 Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy Linköping University Linköping Sweden
5 Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden
6 Department of Epidemiology and Global Health Umeå University Umeå Sweden
3 Department of Cardiology Skane University Hospital Malmö Sweden
9 Department of Clinical Sciences Lund University Lund Sweden
7 Faculty of Medicine The University of Queensland Herston, Queensland Australia
8 Department of Cardiology Skane University Hospital Lund Sweden
1 Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö Lund University Malmö Sweden
11 Department of Internal Medicine Skane University Hospital Lund Sweden
10 Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Umeå University Umeå Sweden
2 Department of Internal Medicine Helsingborg Hospital Helsingborg Sweden
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 3 Department of Cardiology Skane University Hospital Malmö Sweden
– name: 11 Department of Internal Medicine Skane University Hospital Lund Sweden
– name: 2 Department of Internal Medicine Helsingborg Hospital Helsingborg Sweden
– name: 10 Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Umeå University Umeå Sweden
– name: 4 Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy Linköping University Linköping Sweden
– name: 5 Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden
– name: 6 Department of Epidemiology and Global Health Umeå University Umeå Sweden
– name: 8 Department of Cardiology Skane University Hospital Lund Sweden
– name: 9 Department of Clinical Sciences Lund University Lund Sweden
– name: 1 Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö Lund University Malmö Sweden
– name: 7 Faculty of Medicine The University of Queensland Herston, Queensland Australia
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Halldóra
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8900-7916
  surname: Ögmundsdóttir Michelsen
  fullname: Ögmundsdóttir Michelsen, Halldóra
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ingela
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9995-5234
  surname: Sjölin
  fullname: Sjölin, Ingela
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Maria
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6031-7478
  surname: Bäck
  fullname: Bäck, Maria
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Manuel
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4338-7335
  surname: Gonzalez Garcia
  fullname: Gonzalez Garcia, Manuel
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Anneli
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9589-7225
  surname: Olsson
  fullname: Olsson, Anneli
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Camilla
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4043-7130
  surname: Sandberg
  fullname: Sandberg, Camilla
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Alexandru
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7587-5050
  surname: Schiopu
  fullname: Schiopu, Alexandru
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Margrét
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1677-1566
  surname: Leósdóttir
  fullname: Leósdóttir, Margrét
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35357316$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-185040$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-194274$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
BookMark eNqNk9tu1DAQhiNURA_0FVAkhARCW-zEThwukJbS0pVaQKXQS2viw9ZtEi92Uiivwssyu9uWbgUSSpSM7c__jGc8m8la5zuTJNuU7GS0Kl5lPMvYg2SDslyMhCjp2h17PdmM8ZyQjLCKPkrWc57zMqfFRvJrz1qj-tTbFNJDZ03srxoz2vdqiEanp6YevYW5NZ7NGqegd75L8T128SLdB9X7kB5BB1PTmq5PXZd-QgbNmJ6e-fQALg1-NIofXXkFQTto0klnIai51Ov0GDrtW_cTXez6rg--adA8Ccg9Th5aaKLZvv5vJV_29052D0aHH99PdseHI1VmrB-JGnRt8rxWChivdGaY0JWoC1LXQG2VFYwqRQFIwYhmJbW00KxWWnOTKyPyrWSy1NUezuUsuBbClfTg5GLCh6mE0DvVGMktJrvkFmqRY3ILEFDYzOiK4MgUOWrBUit-N7OhXlGb-dBDI4OJBo9_JptBRiORuklslJZDrXVVSVISIllZMikEt5LQWgvKlMjKuY_RP328c1_Hi4iHdpC0YlnJ_o9vHPKCE0aQf7PkEW6NVljNgHGvHGVlpXNncuovZUUoLwuOAs-vBYL_NuCVkq2LyjQNdMYPUWJFuOCiIBmiT--h534IHZZ7QRWVyDj_Q00Bi-A669GvmovKcVkgUQgx19r5C4WPNq1T2C7W4fzKhhcrG5DpzY9-CkOMcvL5wyr75G5SbrNx00oIPFsCKvgYg7G3CCVy3qJy0aLIvbzHKdcvyo_RuuYe_RveJDtO
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_54396
crossref_primary_10_1093_ehjdh_ztad012
crossref_primary_10_2196_38520
crossref_primary_10_3233_THC_230022
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2022_1020744
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12082886
crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_152315_1
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41440_024_01939_6
crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2023_2244883
crossref_primary_10_1177_1357633X231201874
crossref_primary_10_2196_49178
crossref_primary_10_2196_46439
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph192013130
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2024_108279
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2023_107922
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2024_104845
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2024_1412675
Cites_doi 10.1161/circoutcomes.118.005375
10.7326/0003-4819-69-3-652_2
10.1016/j.ahj.2016.05.005
10.1177/2047487319832394
10.1177/2047487319865729
10.2196/jmir.7277
10.1093/eurheartj/ehv428
10.1093/heapro/das029
10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy018
10.1097/HCR.0000000000000063
10.1056/nejmoa1200303
10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00008
10.1111/sms.12991
10.1186/s13063-018-3118-1
10.1097/mnh.0000000000000279
10.1186/s12913-019-4106-1
10.1186/s12911-016-0329-9
10.1177/2047487315569401
10.1161/cir.0000000000000232
10.1177/2047487320905717
10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11
10.1097/hjr.0b013e32832ed875
10.1007/s12265-015-9629-1
10.1097/HCR.0b013e3182343aa7
10.1136/bmj.b1665
10.3109/00365519009091599
10.1161/circulationaha.107.185649
10.1177/2047487312449597
10.1001/jama.299.24.2857
10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.049
10.1016/j.ahj.2017.02.016
10.1177/1474515119826510
10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305783
10.2196/16695
10.1161/jaha.113.000568
10.2196/13055
10.1007/s12529-016-9583-6
10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60868-5
10.1097/HJH.0000000000001197
10.1097/hjr.0b013e32832a4e7a
10.1056/nejmsa053935
10.1177/2047487320913379
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Halldóra Ögmundsdóttir Michelsen, Ingela Sjölin, Maria Bäck, Manuel Gonzalez Garcia, Anneli Olsson, Camilla Sandberg, Alexandru Schiopu, Margrét Leósdóttir. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 31.03.2022.
COPYRIGHT 2022 Journal of Medical Internet Research
2022. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Halldóra Ögmundsdóttir Michelsen, Ingela Sjölin, Maria Bäck, Manuel Gonzalez Garcia, Anneli Olsson, Camilla Sandberg, Alexandru Schiopu, Margrét Leósdóttir. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 31.03.2022. 2022
Copyright_xml – notice: Halldóra Ögmundsdóttir Michelsen, Ingela Sjölin, Maria Bäck, Manuel Gonzalez Garcia, Anneli Olsson, Camilla Sandberg, Alexandru Schiopu, Margrét Leósdóttir. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 31.03.2022.
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 Journal of Medical Internet Research
– notice: 2022. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: Halldóra Ögmundsdóttir Michelsen, Ingela Sjölin, Maria Bäck, Manuel Gonzalez Garcia, Anneli Olsson, Camilla Sandberg, Alexandru Schiopu, Margrét Leósdóttir. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 31.03.2022. 2022
CorporateAuthor Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund
Sektion II
Lunds universitet
Section II
Profile areas and other strong research environments
Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö
Lund University
Kardiologi
Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund
Strategiska forskningsområden (SFO)
EpiHealth: Epidemiology for Health
Faculty of Medicine
Internmedicin - epidemiologi
Strategic research areas (SRA)
Medicinska fakulteten
Cardiology
Kardiovaskulär forskning - immunitet och ateroskleros
Cardiovascular Research - Immunity and Atherosclerosis
Profilområden och andra starka forskningsmiljöer
Internal Medicine - Epidemiology
Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Malmö
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: Faculty of Medicine
– name: Medicinska fakulteten
– name: Sektion II
– name: Strategiska forskningsområden (SFO)
– name: Kardiologi
– name: Section II
– name: Cardiovascular Research - Immunity and Atherosclerosis
– name: Kardiovaskulär forskning - immunitet och ateroskleros
– name: EpiHealth: Epidemiology for Health
– name: Internal Medicine - Epidemiology
– name: Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Malmö
– name: Cardiology
– name: Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund
– name: Strategic research areas (SRA)
– name: Lunds universitet
– name: Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund
– name: Profilområden och andra starka forskningsmiljöer
– name: Lund University
– name: Profile areas and other strong research environments
– name: Internmedicin - epidemiologi
– name: Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
ISN
3V.
7QJ
7RV
7X7
7XB
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
ALSLI
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
CNYFK
DWQXO
E3H
F2A
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
KB0
M0S
M1O
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PRQQA
7X8
5PM
ABXSW
ADTPV
AOWAS
D8T
DG8
ZZAVC
ADHXS
D93
AGCHP
D95
DOA
DOI 10.2196/25224
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Canada in Context
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Social Science Premium Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One
Library & information science collection.
ProQuest Central
Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)
Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Library Science Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Social Sciences
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
SWEPUB Linköpings universitet full text
SwePub
SwePub Articles
SWEPUB Freely available online
SWEPUB Linköpings universitet
SwePub Articles full text
SWEPUB Umeå universitet full text
SWEPUB Umeå universitet
SWEPUB Lunds universitet full text
SWEPUB Lunds universitet
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Library Science
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Library & Information Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
Social Science Premium Collection
ProQuest One Social Sciences
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList


MEDLINE - Academic

Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE



Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Library & Information Science
EISSN 1438-8871
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_5f21975fab834386a8a6f2ed90438e63
oai_portal_research_lu_se_publications_f5abdd99_0700_4774_885f_01bd814c8273
oai_DiVA_org_umu_194274
oai_DiVA_org_liu_185040
PMC9015765
A762556882
35357316
10_2196_25224
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Sweden
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Sweden
GroupedDBID ---
.4I
.DC
29L
2WC
36B
53G
5GY
5VS
77K
7RV
7X7
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAKPC
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABIVO
ABUWG
ACGFO
ADBBV
AEGXH
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AIAGR
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALSLI
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
CCPQU
CITATION
CNYFK
CS3
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EAP
EBD
EBS
EJD
ELW
EMB
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FRP
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
ICO
IEA
IHR
INH
ISN
ITC
KQ8
M1O
M48
NAPCQ
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
RNS
RPM
SJN
SV3
TR2
UKHRP
XSB
ACUHS
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PPXIY
PRQQA
PMFND
3V.
7QJ
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
E3H
F2A
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
77I
7X8
PUEGO
5PM
ABXSW
ADRAZ
ADTPV
AOWAS
C1A
D8T
DG8
O5R
O5S
WOQ
ZZAVC
ADHXS
D93
AGCHP
D95
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c724t-8badbe33bcca459d2e48d98b60bba1f92641cc1aa0640d471f16d4bcdd5e3ce83
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1438-8871
1439-4456
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:24:05 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 21 03:11:41 EDT 2025
Tue Sep 09 23:20:53 EDT 2025
Tue Sep 09 23:41:19 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:10:12 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 07:29:06 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 23:49:51 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:28:23 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:29:23 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 06:03:13 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:46:04 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:06:02 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:51 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords mobile device app
risk factors
mobile phone
cardiovascular
web-based application
cardiac rehabilitation
eHealth
Language English
License Halldóra Ögmundsdóttir Michelsen, Ingela Sjölin, Maria Bäck, Manuel Gonzalez Garcia, Anneli Olsson, Camilla Sandberg, Alexandru Schiopu, Margrét Leósdóttir. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 31.03.2022.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c724t-8badbe33bcca459d2e48d98b60bba1f92641cc1aa0640d471f16d4bcdd5e3ce83
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ORCID 0000-0002-4043-7130
0000-0001-9995-5234
0000-0002-8900-7916
0000-0002-6031-7478
0000-0002-4338-7335
0000-0003-1677-1566
0000-0001-9589-7225
0000-0002-7587-5050
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2645698255?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%&accountid=15518
PMID 35357316
PQID 2645698255
PQPubID 2033121
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5f21975fab834386a8a6f2ed90438e63
swepub_primary_oai_portal_research_lu_se_publications_f5abdd99_0700_4774_885f_01bd814c8273
swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_umu_194274
swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_liu_185040
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9015765
proquest_miscellaneous_2645858602
proquest_journals_2645698255
gale_infotracmisc_A762556882
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A762556882
gale_incontextgauss_ISN_A762556882
pubmed_primary_35357316
crossref_primary_10_2196_25224
crossref_citationtrail_10_2196_25224
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-03-31
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-03-31
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-03-31
  day: 31
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Canada
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Canada
– name: Toronto
– name: Toronto, Canada
PublicationTitle Journal of medical Internet research
PublicationTitleAlternate J Med Internet Res
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Journal of Medical Internet Research
Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor
JMIR Publications
Publisher_xml – name: Journal of Medical Internet Research
– name: Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor
– name: JMIR Publications
References ref13
ref12
ref15
ref14
ref11
ref10
Lear, S (ref41) 2015; 209
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref46
ref45
ref48
ref47
ref42
ref44
ref43
(ref28) 2018
ref49
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
Borg, G (ref27) 1998
ref40
ref35
ref34
ref37
ref36
ref31
ref30
ref33
ref32
ref2
ref1
ref39
ref38
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref25
ref20
ref22
ref21
ref29
References_xml – ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1161/circoutcomes.118.005375
– year: 1998
  ident: ref27
  publication-title: Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-69-3-652_2
– ident: ref36
  doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.05.005
– ident: ref24
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.1177/2047487319832394
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1177/2047487319865729
– ident: ref44
  doi: 10.2196/jmir.7277
– ident: ref9
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv428
– ident: ref43
  doi: 10.1093/heapro/das029
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy018
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000063
– ident: ref40
  doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1200303
– ident: ref38
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00008
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.1111/sms.12991
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3118-1
– ident: ref37
  doi: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000279
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4106-1
– ident: ref46
  doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0329-9
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1177/2047487315569401
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000232
– ident: ref47
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1177/2047487320905717
– ident: ref45
  doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11
– volume: 209
  start-page: 58
  year: 2015
  ident: ref41
  publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform
– ident: ref42
  doi: 10.1097/hjr.0b013e32832ed875
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.1007/s12265-015-9629-1
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3182343aa7
– ident: ref34
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1665
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.3109/00365519009091599
– start-page: 470
  year: 2018
  ident: ref28
  publication-title: Nationella Riktlinjer för Prevention Och Behandling Vid Ohälsosamma Levnadsvanor - Stöd för Styrning Och Ledning
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.107.185649
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1177/2047487312449597
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.1001/jama.299.24.2857
– ident: ref39
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.049
– ident: ref33
  doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.02.016
– ident: ref48
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1177/1474515119826510
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305783
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.2196/16695
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1161/jaha.113.000568
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.2196/13055
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1007/s12529-016-9583-6
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60868-5
– ident: ref49
  doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001197
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1097/hjr.0b013e32832a4e7a
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1056/nejmsa053935
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1177/2047487320913379
SSID ssj0020491
Score 2.453546
Snippet Cardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended cardiac...
Background Cardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended...
Background: Cardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of...
BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of...
BackgroundCardiac rehabilitation is central in reducing mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction. However, the fulfillment of guideline-recommended...
SourceID doaj
swepub
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage e25224
SubjectTerms Adherence
Application
Blood pressure
Cardiac patients
cardiac rehabilitation
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
cardiovascular
Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular diseases
Change agents
Clinical Medicine
Clinical trials
Diet
eHealth
Evidence-based medicine
Exercise
Fish
Habits
Heart attack
Heart attacks
Humans
Internet
Intervention
Kardiologi och kardiovaskulära sjukdomar
Klinisk medicin
Life Style
Lifestyles
Medical and Health Sciences
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
mobile device app
mobile phone
Morbidity
Mortality
Myocardial infarction
Myocardial Infarction - therapy
Original Paper
Physical activity
Physical fitness
Quality of Life
Rehabilitation
Risk Factors
Self control
Smoking cessation
Software
Uptake
web-based application
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3dT9RAEN8YHoiJMYpfVSCrIfjU0I_dduvbgV7QCDEIQnzZ7Fe9xqMllprgv-I_60y7HBRNeDFpmuZ22m53ZnZmbmd_Q8gGg6hDMxeFwkQ8ZCorQs01D42KMmfRw-ghhfb2s90j9uGEn1wr9YU5YQM88DBwW7wEncp5qbRIWSoyJVRWJs4WuITlsh7nMyqiy2DKh1rg98bL5B4mOoOIbSXgZbCR5ekB-v-ehq_ZoZs5kiMk0d76TB-Q-95tpJOhuw_JHVevkDW_6YBuUr-rCEeZenVdIct7fuH8Efk9oBTTpqSKfqxK6MTF3IXTxnSts_TY6XBb4dXkakGbwnFQtd_ptK_JQ68yZWhV008DIGtLj2cN3VU_HZwsPHzvAqwjSt0cOwVqhI96Qw9UbZvT6he8YmfIjp_D5SGK_2NyNH13uLMb-roMockTdh4Krax2aaqB-4wXNnFM2ELoLNJaxWUBPlZsTKwUrhJasH5lnFmmjbXcpcaJ9AlZqpvaPSOU5cDULDK8zBVLXKTAY7DC8NhYnRZlFpCNS55J40HLsXbGXELwgqyVPWsDsr4gOxtQOm4SbCPDF40Iqt3_AKImvajJ20QtIK9QXCTCZtSYl_NNdW0r33_elxOwKYjlJpKAvPZEZQM9Ncpvc4DvRaStEeXqiBL02oybL6VS-nmllTC0PCtAv3hAXi6a8U7Mlatd0w00gmNtsYA8HYR48d0pTznWKgtIPhLv0cCMW-pq1qOOo-OYZ_DezUERRre8rb5M-rGcV50EFxBMwy2E3SkQFizJgTdf_0E4RJ_SQ17N5LyTrZNn1_7LliVX2tqikGC2IskgkJFC8FJGsbYiZkaAa_78fzD-Bbmb4K6XfivqKlk6_9G5NfBFz_V6P-38AVJniuY
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1tT9RAEN4gJMTEGMW3KpDVEPzU0JfddmtizIFc0MiFIAjxy2bfCo1Hixw1wb_in3Wm7R0UjSaXS9Od3W53ZnZmu7PPELLGYNWhmQt8YQLuM5Vkvuaa-0YFibPoYTSQQrujZOeQfTzmx3NkND0Lg2GV0zmxmahtZfAb-QYYbp5k0DJ_d_7dx6xRuLs6TaGhutQK9m0DMXaHLMCUzIN5srC5Pdrbny3BwB8OF8k9DIAG0duIwPtgPYvUAPf_OT3fsE-3Yyd7CKONVRo-IPc7d5IOWv4_JHOuXCIr3WEEuk6700Y4-rRT4yWyuNttqD8iv1r0YlrlVNFPRQ6duBo7f1iZeuIsPXLa31R4Nbje6Kbw2y8m3-iwydVDryNoaFHSvRaodUKPTiu6o344-LPQ-O4VWE2UxjF2CtQLm3pD91Vpq7PiJzxiq42aH8PlAarFY3I43D7Y2vG7fA2-SSN26QutrHZxrEEqGM9s5JiwmdBJoLUK8wxYGBoTKoW7hxasYh4mlmljLXexcSJ-QubLqnTPCGVpzOIkMDxPFYtcoMCTsMLw0FgdZ3nikbUpz6TpwMwxp8ZYwqIGWSsb1npkdUZ23qJ33CbYRIbPChFsu7lRXZzITnclz6FCynOlBfRKJEqoJI-czXAX1SWxR16huEiE0ygxXudE1ZOJ_PB5JAdgaxDjTUQeed0R5RX01Kju-AO8LyJw9SiXe5Sg76ZfPJVK2c03E3mtHR55OSvGmhhDV7qqbmkEx5xjHnnaCvHsvWMec8xh5pG0J969gemXlMVpg0aODmWawHPXW0XoVXlffBk0YzkuagmuIZiM_xDWZ0CYsSgF3nz9C2G7KpUdFNapHNdy4uT5jW_cMudKW5tlEsxZIBkscKQQPJdBqK0ImRHgsj__9yi-IHcjPOfSHD5dJvOXF7VbAe_zUq92U8pvSOyJjQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Effect of a Lifestyle-Focused Web-Based Application on Risk Factor Management in Patients Who Have Had a Myocardial Infarction: Randomized Controlled Trial
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35357316
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2645698255
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2645858602
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9015765
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-185040
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-194274
https://doaj.org/article/5f21975fab834386a8a6f2ed90438e63
Volume 24
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3rT9RAEN8IJMTEGMXXKVxWQ_BTtY_ddmtizIFc0HhIkFf8stlX4WJpkaNG_Ff8Z51py0GRaHJpmtvZdjs705ntzP6GkGUGqw7NnO8J43OPqTj1NNfcM8qPnUUPo4YUGm3GG7vs4wG_kk3YMnBy49IO60ntnuavfn4_fwcK_xbTmEGAXofgQ7AZMleHiDB7j00DCSE4wPWai2HAE5yFeXKn061jjmrU_r_fzVeM0_XEyQ68aG2ShvfI3daXpINm8u-TW65YIEvtTgS6QtutRsh62urwApkftdH0B-R3A11My4wq-mmcwSDOc-cNS1NNnKX7TnurCs8Gl1FuCr_t8eQbHdaFeuhl-gwdF3SrQWmd0P2jkm6oHw4OFi4-OgeTiaKY46BAt_BSb-i2Kmx5PP4Ft1hrUuZzON1BnXhIdofrO2sbXluswTNJyM48oZXVLoo0iATjqQ0dEzYVOva1VkGWguMVGBMohaFDCyYxC2LLtLGWu8g4ET0is0VZuCeEsiRiUewbniWKhc5X4EZYYXhgrI7SLO6R5Ys5k6ZFMseCGrmEFQ1Orayntkf6U7KTBrrjOsEqTvi0EZG26z_K00PZKq7kGXRIeKa0gFGJWAkVZ6GzKYZQXRz1yAsUF4lYGgUm6xyqajKRH75sygEYGgR4E2GPvGyJshJGalS79wGeF-G3OpSLHUpQdtNtvpBKeaErEljL4xSUjvfI82kz9sQEusKVVUMjOBYc65HHjRBPnzviEccCZj2SdMS7w5huSzE-qqHI0ZtMYrjvSqMInS7vx3uDmpf5uJLgF4K9-A9hdQyEKQsTmJuvNxA2bwPZ4mAdybySEydPrnzglhlX2to0lWDLfMlgdSOF4Jn0A21FwIwAf_3pv5n8jNwOcZNLvfN0kcyenVZuCVzPM90nM8lB0idzq-ubW9v9-gMOHEfB53792vkDkcuJRQ
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3rT9RAEN8gJGhijOLrFHA1iJ8a-tjtbU2IOR6XQ7gLwUOIX9Z9FS4eLVJOg_-K_4t_m7Pt3kHR6CeSy-VyO91uO9N5dGd-g9ASgahDEuN7TPnUIyJOPEkl9ZTwY6Oth1FCCnV7cWefvD-kh1Po17gWxqZVjnViqah1ruw78hUw3DROYGb67vSrZ7tG2d3VcQsN4Vor6NUSYswVdmybi-8QwhWrWxvA79dh2N7sr3c812XAU82QnHtMCi1NFEm4FkITHRrCdMJk7EspgjSBEwdKBULYPS8NujwNYk2k0pqaSBkWwby30AyxL1Cm0czaZm93bxLygf8dzKK7NuEaRH0lBG-H1Cxg2SjgT3NwxR5ez9WsIZqWVrB9H91z7ituVfL2AE2ZbA4tuOIHvIxddZPlNnZqYw7Ndt0G_kP0s0JLxnmKBd4ZpLCIi6Hx2rkaFUbjAyO9NWF_tS431jF89gbFF9wuewPhy4wdPMjwbgUMW-CD4xx3xDcDXxom716AlbbSP7SLAj7Zqd7iPZHp_GTwA06xXmXpD-Fn3z6Gj9D-jXDuMZrO8sw8RZg0IxLFvqJpU5DQ-AI8F80UDZSWUZLGDbQ05hlXDjzd9vAYcgiiLGt5ydoGWpyQnVZoIdcJ1izDJ4MW3Lv8Iz874k5XcJrCAU2aCslgVSwWTMRpaHRid21NHDXQKysu3MJ3ZDY_6EiMioJvfejxFtg2iynHwgZ644jSHFaqhCu3gOu1iF81yvkaJegXVR8eSyV3-q3gl09jA72cDNsjbc5eZvJRRcOo7XHWQE8qIZ5cd0QjanumNVCzJt61G1MfyQbHJfq5dWCbMZx3uXoQaodsDD62yns5HIw4uKJgov5DODoBwoSETeDNp78QVlEwd9Bbx3w44oXhp1feqfOUCql1knAwnz4nEFBxxmjK_UBqFhDFIER49u-7-ALd7vS7O3xnq7f9HN0JbY1NWfg6j6bPz0ZmATzfc7no1AtGn29ao_0GmhbIsg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR1rT9RAcIOYEBNjFF-ngKtB_NTQx267NTHmAC8gjxAEIX5Z91W4eLRIOQ3-Ff-Jv86ZtsdRNPqJ5HJpurPPmZ1Hd3aGkHkGVodmzveE8bnHVJx6mmvuGeXHzqKGUYUU2tyKV_fY-wN-MEF-je7CoFvliCdWjNoWBr-RL4Lg5nEKLfPFrHGL2F7pvT356mEGKTxpHaXTqElk3Z1_B_OtfLO2Arh-GYa9d7vLq16TYcAzScjOPKGV1S6KNMyD8dSGjgmbCh37WqsgS6HTwJhAKTzvssDHsyC2TBtruYuMExG0e4PcTCLGMG1EcjA29kDzDqbIbXS1BiJfDEHPYS3ZV6UI-FMQXJKEV700W7FMK_nXu0vuNIor7daUdo9MuHyazDbXHugCbe41IZ5pwzCmydRmc3R_n_ys4yTTIqOKbvQzGMT5wHm9wgxLZ-m-096Swqfu-Eidwm-nX36hvSorEB376tB-TrfrkLAl3T8q6Kr65uDPQuOb5yCfke4HOCjAEjb1mu6o3BbH_R_QxXLtnz-Ax13cgA_I3rXg7SGZzIvcPSaUAfKi2Dc8SxQLna9AZ7HC8MBYHaVZ3CHzI5xJ04RNx-wdAwnmE6JWVqjtkLkLsJM6TshVgCVE-EUhhvWuXhSnh7LhEpJnUCHhmdICRiViJVSchc6meF7r4qhDXiC5SAzckeMWOFTDspRrH7ZkF6QaRpMTYYe8aoCyAkZqVHPRAuaLsb5akDMtSOAspl08okrZcLZSjvdhhzy_KMaa6K2Xu2JYwwiO2c065FFNxBfzjnjEMVtahyQt8m4tTLsk7x9Vcc9RdU1i6Heh3gitKiv9j91qLQf9oQQlFITTfwCHxwCYsjAB3Hz6C2Bt_8om6NaRHAxl6eTJpa_pMuNKW5umEgSnLxmYUlIInkk_0FYEzAgwDp78exWfkSngY3JjbWv9KbkV4uWa6sbrDJk8Ox26WVB5z_RcxVso-XzdzOw3RNXGTg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+a+Lifestyle-Focused+Web-Based+Application+on+Risk+Factor+Management+in+Patients+Who+Have+Had+a+Myocardial+Infarction%3A+Randomized+Controlled+Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+medical+Internet+research&rft.au=%C3%96gmundsd%C3%B3ttir+Michelsen%2C+Halld%C3%B3ra&rft.au=Sj%C3%B6lin%2C+Ingela&rft.au=B%C3%A4ck%2C+Maria&rft.au=Gonzalez+Garcia%2C+Manuel&rft.date=2022-03-31&rft.pub=Journal+of+Medical+Internet+Research&rft.issn=1439-4456&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196%2F25224&rft.externalDocID=A762556882
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon