Effectiveness of Head-and-Neck Molecular Imaging Reporting and Data System Criterion in Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma PostConcurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Purpose: Postconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response assessment has been challenging in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) due to prevailing postradiation changes. Molecular response methods have been encouraging, although further clarifications and validations wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIndian journal of nuclear medicine Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 334 - 339
Main Authors Gupta, Manoj, Jajodia, Ankush, Ahlawat, Parveen, Gairola, Munish, Agarwal, Mudit, Goyal, Sumit, Mehta, Parv, Choudhury, Partha Sarathi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published India Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 01.10.2023
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
Edition2
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0972-3919
0974-0244
DOI10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_23_23

Cover

Abstract Purpose: Postconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response assessment has been challenging in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) due to prevailing postradiation changes. Molecular response methods have been encouraging, although further clarifications and validations were needed. We tested the effectiveness of a proposed semi-quantitative molecular response criterion in these patients. Materials and Methods: Two subspecialty-trained physicians evaluated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography of LA-HNSCC patients (n = 83) post 3 months CRT using a five points Head and Neck Molecular Imaging-Reporting and Data System (HAN-MI-RADS) criterion. Where available, histopathology examination with clinical and imaging interpretation was taken as a reference for the disease. A diagnostic accuracy comparison was done with the existing Hopkins score. Further effectiveness was analyzed with disease-free survival (DFI) and overall survival (OS). Results: Metastasis was developed in 11/83 patients at 3 months of evaluation. Of 72 patients, 39, 2, and 31 patients had a complete response, equivocal response, and partial response as per HAN-MI-RADS. Per patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for predicting loco-regional disease up to 1 and 2 years was 93.3%, 92.5%, 90.3%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 84.9%, 91.9%, 90.3%, 87.2%, and 88.6% respectively. One year and two years DFI for each HAN-MI-RADS score showed a statistically significant difference while it was not for OS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed significantly better outcome predictability of HAN-MI-RADS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.884) than Hopkins (AUC 0.699). Conclusions: A five points HAN-MI-RADS criterion was found promising for response assessment with less equivocal results and statistically significant higher AUC than Hopkins for loco-regional recurrence prediction.
AbstractList Postconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response assessment has been challenging in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) due to prevailing postradiation changes. Molecular response methods have been encouraging, although further clarifications and validations were needed. We tested the effectiveness of a proposed semi-quantitative molecular response criterion in these patients. Two subspecialty-trained physicians evaluated F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography of LA-HNSCC patients ( = 83) post 3 months CRT using a five points Head and Neck Molecular Imaging-Reporting and Data System (HAN-MI-RADS) criterion. Where available, histopathology examination with clinical and imaging interpretation was taken as a reference for the disease. A diagnostic accuracy comparison was done with the existing Hopkins score. Further effectiveness was analyzed with disease-free survival (DFI) and overall survival (OS). Metastasis was developed in 11/83 patients at 3 months of evaluation. Of 72 patients, 39, 2, and 31 patients had a complete response, equivocal response, and partial response as per HAN-MI-RADS. Per patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for predicting loco-regional disease up to 1 and 2 years was 93.3%, 92.5%, 90.3%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 84.9%, 91.9%, 90.3%, 87.2%, and 88.6% respectively. One year and two years DFI for each HAN-MI-RADS score showed a statistically significant difference while it was not for OS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed significantly better outcome predictability of HAN-MI-RADS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.884) than Hopkins (AUC 0.699). A five points HAN-MI-RADS criterion was found promising for response assessment with less equivocal results and statistically significant higher AUC than Hopkins for loco-regional recurrence prediction.
Purpose: Postconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response assessment has been challenging in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) due to prevailing postradiation changes. Molecular response methods have been encouraging, although further clarifications and validations were needed. We tested the effectiveness of a proposed semi-quantitative molecular response criterion in these patients. Materials and Methods: Two subspecialty-trained physicians evaluated [sup.18]F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography of LA-HNSCC patients (n = 83) post 3 months CRT using a five points Head and Neck Molecular Imaging-Reporting and Data System (HAN-MI-RADS) criterion. Where available, histopathology examination with clinical and imaging interpretation was taken as a reference for the disease. A diagnostic accuracy comparison was done with the existing Hopkins score. Further effectiveness was analyzed with disease-free survival (DFI) and overall survival (OS). Results: Metastasis was developed in 11/83 patients at 3 months of evaluation. Of 72 patients, 39, 2, and 31 patients had a complete response, equivocal response, and partial response as per HAN-MI-RADS. Per patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for predicting loco-regional disease up to 1 and 2 years was 93.3%, 92.5%, 90.3%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 84.9%, 91.9%, 90.3%, 87.2%, and 88.6% respectively. One year and two years DFI for each HAN-MI-RADS score showed a statistically significant difference while it was not for OS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed significantly better outcome predictability of HAN-MI-RADS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.884) than Hopkins (AUC 0.699). Conclusions: A five points HAN-MI-RADS criterion was found promising for response assessment with less equivocal results and statistically significant higher AUC than Hopkins for loco-regional recurrence prediction. Keywords: Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, head-and-neck molecular imaging-reporting and data system, head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma, Hopkins score, molecular response
Postconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response assessment has been challenging in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) due to prevailing postradiation changes. Molecular response methods have been encouraging, although further clarifications and validations were needed. We tested the effectiveness of a proposed semi-quantitative molecular response criterion in these patients. Two subspecialty-trained physicians evaluated [sup.18]F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography of LA-HNSCC patients (n = 83) post 3 months CRT using a five points Head and Neck Molecular Imaging-Reporting and Data System (HAN-MI-RADS) criterion. Where available, histopathology examination with clinical and imaging interpretation was taken as a reference for the disease. A diagnostic accuracy comparison was done with the existing Hopkins score. Further effectiveness was analyzed with disease-free survival (DFI) and overall survival (OS). Metastasis was developed in 11/83 patients at 3 months of evaluation. Of 72 patients, 39, 2, and 31 patients had a complete response, equivocal response, and partial response as per HAN-MI-RADS. Per patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for predicting loco-regional disease up to 1 and 2 years was 93.3%, 92.5%, 90.3%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 84.9%, 91.9%, 90.3%, 87.2%, and 88.6% respectively. One year and two years DFI for each HAN-MI-RADS score showed a statistically significant difference while it was not for OS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed significantly better outcome predictability of HAN-MI-RADS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.884) than Hopkins (AUC 0.699). A five points HAN-MI-RADS criterion was found promising for response assessment with less equivocal results and statistically significant higher AUC than Hopkins for loco-regional recurrence prediction.
Postconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response assessment has been challenging in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) due to prevailing postradiation changes. Molecular response methods have been encouraging, although further clarifications and validations were needed. We tested the effectiveness of a proposed semi-quantitative molecular response criterion in these patients.PurposePostconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response assessment has been challenging in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) due to prevailing postradiation changes. Molecular response methods have been encouraging, although further clarifications and validations were needed. We tested the effectiveness of a proposed semi-quantitative molecular response criterion in these patients.Two subspecialty-trained physicians evaluated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography of LA-HNSCC patients (n = 83) post 3 months CRT using a five points Head and Neck Molecular Imaging-Reporting and Data System (HAN-MI-RADS) criterion. Where available, histopathology examination with clinical and imaging interpretation was taken as a reference for the disease. A diagnostic accuracy comparison was done with the existing Hopkins score. Further effectiveness was analyzed with disease-free survival (DFI) and overall survival (OS).Materials and MethodsTwo subspecialty-trained physicians evaluated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography of LA-HNSCC patients (n = 83) post 3 months CRT using a five points Head and Neck Molecular Imaging-Reporting and Data System (HAN-MI-RADS) criterion. Where available, histopathology examination with clinical and imaging interpretation was taken as a reference for the disease. A diagnostic accuracy comparison was done with the existing Hopkins score. Further effectiveness was analyzed with disease-free survival (DFI) and overall survival (OS).Metastasis was developed in 11/83 patients at 3 months of evaluation. Of 72 patients, 39, 2, and 31 patients had a complete response, equivocal response, and partial response as per HAN-MI-RADS. Per patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for predicting loco-regional disease up to 1 and 2 years was 93.3%, 92.5%, 90.3%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 84.9%, 91.9%, 90.3%, 87.2%, and 88.6% respectively. One year and two years DFI for each HAN-MI-RADS score showed a statistically significant difference while it was not for OS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed significantly better outcome predictability of HAN-MI-RADS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.884) than Hopkins (AUC 0.699).ResultsMetastasis was developed in 11/83 patients at 3 months of evaluation. Of 72 patients, 39, 2, and 31 patients had a complete response, equivocal response, and partial response as per HAN-MI-RADS. Per patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for predicting loco-regional disease up to 1 and 2 years was 93.3%, 92.5%, 90.3%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 84.9%, 91.9%, 90.3%, 87.2%, and 88.6% respectively. One year and two years DFI for each HAN-MI-RADS score showed a statistically significant difference while it was not for OS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed significantly better outcome predictability of HAN-MI-RADS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.884) than Hopkins (AUC 0.699).A five points HAN-MI-RADS criterion was found promising for response assessment with less equivocal results and statistically significant higher AUC than Hopkins for loco-regional recurrence prediction.ConclusionsA five points HAN-MI-RADS criterion was found promising for response assessment with less equivocal results and statistically significant higher AUC than Hopkins for loco-regional recurrence prediction.
Purpose: Postconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response assessment has been challenging in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) due to prevailing postradiation changes. Molecular response methods have been encouraging, although further clarifications and validations were needed. We tested the effectiveness of a proposed semi-quantitative molecular response criterion in these patients. Materials and Methods: Two subspecialty-trained physicians evaluated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography of LA-HNSCC patients (n = 83) post 3 months CRT using a five points Head and Neck Molecular Imaging-Reporting and Data System (HAN-MI-RADS) criterion. Where available, histopathology examination with clinical and imaging interpretation was taken as a reference for the disease. A diagnostic accuracy comparison was done with the existing Hopkins score. Further effectiveness was analyzed with disease-free survival (DFI) and overall survival (OS). Results: Metastasis was developed in 11/83 patients at 3 months of evaluation. Of 72 patients, 39, 2, and 31 patients had a complete response, equivocal response, and partial response as per HAN-MI-RADS. Per patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for predicting loco-regional disease up to 1 and 2 years was 93.3%, 92.5%, 90.3%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 84.9%, 91.9%, 90.3%, 87.2%, and 88.6% respectively. One year and two years DFI for each HAN-MI-RADS score showed a statistically significant difference while it was not for OS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed significantly better outcome predictability of HAN-MI-RADS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.884) than Hopkins (AUC 0.699). Conclusions: A five points HAN-MI-RADS criterion was found promising for response assessment with less equivocal results and statistically significant higher AUC than Hopkins for loco-regional recurrence prediction.
Purpose: Postconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response assessment has been challenging in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) due to prevailing postradiation changes. Molecular response methods have been encouraging, although further clarifications and validations were needed. We tested the effectiveness of a proposed semi-quantitative molecular response criterion in these patients. Materials and Methods: Two subspecialty-trained physicians evaluated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography of LA-HNSCC patients (n = 83) post 3 months CRT using a five points Head and Neck Molecular Imaging-Reporting and Data System (HAN-MI-RADS) criterion. Where available, histopathology examination with clinical and imaging interpretation was taken as a reference for the disease. A diagnostic accuracy comparison was done with the existing Hopkins score. Further effectiveness was analyzed with disease-free survival (DFI) and overall survival (OS). Results: Metastasis was developed in 11/83 patients at 3 months of evaluation. Of 72 patients, 39, 2, and 31 patients had a complete response, equivocal response, and partial response as per HAN-MI-RADS. Per patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for predicting loco-regional disease up to 1 and 2 years was 93.3%, 92.5%, 90.3%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 84.9%, 91.9%, 90.3%, 87.2%, and 88.6% respectively. One year and two years DFI for each HAN-MI-RADS score showed a statistically significant difference while it was not for OS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed significantly better outcome predictability of HAN-MI-RADS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.884) than Hopkins (AUC 0.699). Conclusions: A five points HAN-MI-RADS criterion was found promising for response assessment with less equivocal results and statistically significant higher AUC than Hopkins for loco-regional recurrence prediction.
Audience Academic
Author Goyal, Sumit
Ahlawat, Parveen
Mehta, Parv
Jajodia, Ankush
Gairola, Munish
Agarwal, Mudit
Choudhury, Partha Sarathi
Gupta, Manoj
AuthorAffiliation 3 Department of Surgical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Radiotherapy, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
1 Department of Radiology, Juravinski Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
4 Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
– name: 2 Department of Radiotherapy, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
– name: 1 Department of Radiology, Juravinski Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
– name: 3 Department of Surgical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
– name: 4 Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Manoj
  surname: Gupta
  fullname: Gupta, Manoj
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ankush
  surname: Jajodia
  fullname: Jajodia, Ankush
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Parveen
  surname: Ahlawat
  fullname: Ahlawat, Parveen
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Munish
  surname: Gairola
  fullname: Gairola, Munish
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Mudit
  surname: Agarwal
  fullname: Agarwal, Mudit
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Sumit
  surname: Goyal
  fullname: Goyal, Sumit
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Parv
  surname: Mehta
  fullname: Mehta, Parv
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Partha Sarathi
  surname: Choudhury
  fullname: Choudhury, Partha Sarathi
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38390552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNk11v0zAUhiM0xD7gmjtkCQlxk86xkzi-QlUYbNL4EINry3Gc1ltid3bSqn-G38rpurK2YhNKFFvO874-R-ec4-jAOquj6HWCR2mC6am5tt1o9RGEwvssOsKcpTEmaXpwtycx5Qk_jI5DuMY4T1mev4gOaUE5zjJyFP0-axqtejPXVoeAXIPOtaxjaev4q1Y36ItrtRpa6dFFJyfGTtAPPXO-X-0AQh9lL9HVMvS6Q6U3vfbGWWTsns3V7SA7NwRU6rZFpfTKWNdJ9N2FvnRWDd5r26NyqjvnZW1cP9VezpYvo-eNbIN-db-eRL8-nf0sz-PLb58vyvFlrBhO5zGVjPOkYpQzlmWNgvxJTrNKEZbJhuUq10lV4IqrmldwJHOF6yplKSZZ3WBGT6IPa9_ZUHW6VhCMl62YedNJvxROGrH7x5qpmLi5SHBR4CLH4PD-3sG720GHXnQmKMhWWg2JC5oUpGA8YxTQt3votRu8hfyASknG8oQnT1GEJ1A8zDl7oCay1cLYxkF4anW1GBeEcJykxdMUg6AKzDIC1OgfFDy17oyCxmsMnO_Y_pdg-4Z3W4Kplm0_Da4demiasOv8JLjt-Ga7cH8rtulwALI1oLwLwetGKNPLlQ_EaloooFhNkrgboodJAt3pnm5j_bhivFYsXAtzEG7aYaG9gKhurFs8JhOUpmIzhPQPU5431w
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaad_2024_11_082
Cites_doi 10.1007/s00259-011-1893-y
10.1200/JCO.2017.73.5845
10.1016/j.jacr.2018.05.006
10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30956-0
10.2214/AJR.17.18301
10.3322/caac.21660
10.2967/jnumed.113.136796
10.2214/AJR.19.22642
10.3322/caac.21332
10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.032
10.1002/hed.27160
10.1038/s41598-020-60739-3
10.1007/s12149-018-1291-7
10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x
10.1056/NEJMoa1514493
10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
COPYRIGHT 2023 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.
2023. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine
– notice: Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.
– notice: 2023. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2023
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
8FE
8FG
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AFKRA
ARAPS
AZQEC
BENPR
BGLVJ
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
K9.
M0S
M2O
MBDVC
P5Z
P62
PADUT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
Q9U
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_23_23
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Research Library
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Research Library
Research Library (Corporate)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Research Library China
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (New)
Research Library China
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed


MEDLINE - Academic
Publicly Available Content Database

ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 0974-0244
Edition 2
EndPage 339
ExternalDocumentID PMC10880860
A822901487
A779580752
38390552
10_4103_ijnm_ijnm_23_23
IJNM-38-334
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations India
GeographicLocations_xml – name: India
GroupedDBID ---
53G
7X7
8FE
8FG
8FI
8FJ
8G5
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AEAQA
AFKRA
AHMBA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
ARAPS
AZQEC
BAWUL
BENPR
BGLVJ
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C1A
CCPQU
DIK
DWQXO
E3Z
EBD
EBS
EJD
EOJEC
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
GX1
H13
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IEA
IHR
IHW
IL9
ITC
KQ8
M2O
M48
O5R
O5S
OBODZ
OVD
P2P
P62
PADUT
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PMFND
PQQKQ
PROAC
RMW
RPM
TEORI
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W3E
~8M
AAYXX
ADJBI
CITATION
NPM
PQGLB
3V.
7XB
8FK
K9.
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
Q9U
7X8
PUEGO
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c704v-3a7991b7397755fc0242635bc275af76c6e1b80b9cd9b75aa6c0db474025df073
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 0972-3919
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:35:18 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 17:48:38 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 22:42:56 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 23:25:14 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:59:15 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:20:03 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:00:07 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:14:18 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:22:39 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:19:29 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:51:20 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:12:32 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:25 EDT 2025
Wed May 28 23:14:35 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy
Hopkins score
molecular response
head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma
head-and-neck molecular imaging-reporting and data system
Language English
License Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c704v-3a7991b7397755fc0242635bc275af76c6e1b80b9cd9b75aa6c0db474025df073
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_23_23
PMID 38390552
PQID 2915520997
PQPubID 226510
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10880860
proquest_miscellaneous_3182879573
proquest_journals_3142576191
proquest_journals_2915520997
gale_infotracmisc_A822901487
gale_infotracmisc_A779580752
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A822901487
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A779580752
gale_healthsolutions_A822901487
gale_healthsolutions_A779580752
pubmed_primary_38390552
crossref_citationtrail_10_4103_ijnm_ijnm_23_23
crossref_primary_10_4103_ijnm_ijnm_23_23
wolterskluwer_medknow_10_4103_ijnm_ijnm_23_23_334_Effectiv
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace India
PublicationPlace_xml – name: India
– name: Mumbai
PublicationTitle Indian journal of nuclear medicine
PublicationTitleAlternate Indian J Nucl Med
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
– name: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
– name: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
References Boellaard (R7-20240902) 2015; 42
Zhong (R11-20240902) 2020; 10
Chen (R15-20240902) 2019; 394
Marcus (R8-20240902) 2014; 55
Siegel (R2-20240902) 2016; 66
Van den Wyngaert (R9-20240902) 2017; 35
Urban (R16-20240902) 2020; 148
Aiken (R13-20240902) 2018; 15
Miller (R14-20240902) 2022; 44
Sung (R1-20240902) 2021; 71
Goel (R3-20240902) 2017; 209
Mehanna (R4-20240902) 2016; 374
Eisenhauer (R10-20240902) 2009; 45
Werner (R5-20240902) 2018; 32
Gupta (R6-20240902) 2011; 38
Banks (R12-20240902) 2020; 215
References_xml – volume: 38
  start-page: 2083
  year: 2011
  ident: R6-20240902
  article-title: Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1893-y
– volume: 35
  start-page: 3458
  year: 2017
  ident: R9-20240902
  article-title: Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell cancer: The ECLYPS study
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.5845
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1097
  year: 2018
  ident: R13-20240902
  article-title: ACR neck imaging reporting and data systems (NI-RADS): A white paper of the ACR NI-RADS committee
  publication-title: J Am Coll Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.05.006
– volume: 394
  start-page: 64
  year: 2019
  ident: R15-20240902
  article-title: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30956-0
– volume: 209
  start-page: 289
  year: 2017
  ident: R3-20240902
  article-title: Clinical practice in PET/CT for the management of head and neck squamous cell cancer
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18301
– volume: 71
  start-page: 209
  year: 2021
  ident: R1-20240902
  article-title: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
– volume: 55
  start-page: 1411
  year: 2014
  ident: R8-20240902
  article-title: Head and neck PET/CT: Therapy response interpretation criteria (Hopkins Criteria)-interreader reliability, accuracy, and survival outcomes
  publication-title: J Nucl Med
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.136796
– volume: 215
  start-page: 313
  year: 2020
  ident: R12-20240902
  article-title: It’s about quality, not quantity: Qualitative FDG PET/CT criteria for therapy response assessment in clinical practice
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22642
– volume: 66
  start-page: 7
  year: 2016
  ident: R2-20240902
  article-title: Cancer statistics, 2016
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21332
– volume: 148
  start-page: 14
  year: 2020
  ident: R16-20240902
  article-title: FDG-PET/CT scan assessment of response 12 weeks post radical radiotherapy in oropharynx head and neck cancer: The impact of p16 status
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.032
– volume: 44
  start-page: 2491
  year: 2022
  ident: R14-20240902
  article-title: Posttreatment FDG-PET/CT Hopkins criteria predict locoregional recurrence after definitive radiotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
  publication-title: Head Neck
  doi: 10.1002/hed.27160
– volume: 10
  start-page: 4086
  year: 2020
  ident: R11-20240902
  article-title: Post-treatment FDG PET-CT in head and neck carcinoma: Comparative analysis of 4 qualitative interpretative criteria in a large patient cohort
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60739-3
– volume: 32
  start-page: 512
  year: 2018
  ident: R5-20240902
  article-title: Molecular imaging reporting and data systems (MI-RADS): A generalizable framework for targeted radiotracers with theranostic implications
  publication-title: Ann Nucl Med
  doi: 10.1007/s12149-018-1291-7
– volume: 42
  start-page: 328
  year: 2015
  ident: R7-20240902
  article-title: FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: Version 2.0
  publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x
– volume: 374
  start-page: 1444
  year: 2016
  ident: R4-20240902
  article-title: PET-CT surveillance versus neck dissection in advanced head and neck cancer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514493
– volume: 45
  start-page: 228
  year: 2009
  ident: R10-20240902
  article-title: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
SSID ssj0064766
Score 2.2612178
Snippet Purpose: Postconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response assessment has been challenging in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC)...
Postconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response assessment has been challenging in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) due to...
Purpose: Postconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response assessment has been challenging in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC)...
Purpose:Postconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response assessment has been challenging in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC)...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
wolterskluwer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 334
SubjectTerms Cancer
Chemotherapy
Computed tomography
Criteria
Data systems
Effectiveness
Emission analysis
Evaluation
Head & neck cancer
Medical imaging
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Original
Original Article
Positron emission
Radiation therapy
Regional analysis
Squamous cell carcinoma
Survival
Tomography
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3di9QwEA96gggifrt6agRBX3rXrzSNL3KIxyHokwf7FpK0xd7ZdO9278R_xr_VmSTtbZdbfVnKZhraTuYrM_kNIW9VWWW6LECQjC6jvKnrSDCRR0qA-6zBguvGVfl-K46O8y9zNg8bbstQVjnoRKeoq97gHvl-ikDm7pznx8VZhF2jMLsaWmjcJLcS8ESwdQOfjwFXkXOfqxQ8jTKRCA_tkydxtt-e2G4Pf2SayTSbWKVN3bxmnDYLJ-_-6jGpvTx1Ne1rlunwPrkXXEp64NfAA3Kjtg_J7a8haf6I_PEIxUGt0b6hoICrSNkqsrU5pd3QIZe2netZRH0iAa-AiGIRKfWIzxR0DII795a2dmOa5dmFwn0EirkAarBHke07RRf9cgVBt_FAUBQWSQfLrmrD0a_fj8nx4efvn46i0JYhMjzOL6NMcXAqNUfXkbHGeNB3pk3KmWp4YYo60WWshamEhr9UYeJK5xwiVVY1oFKekB3b2_oZoRDdVGWhwWAacMuUViap67zEjE8V5yaekb2BLdIEzHJsnfFTQuyCfJSOhVd8nJH34w0LD9exnfQ18ln686ajoMsDzgVDiOZ0K4UDyYc4ks_IO0eBygCey6hwpgHeDmG1JnP9h3Jtzt0JJYi7mUx03fD63cOylUEbLeWV7Fw7nCUu7ITIfUbejMM4MRbg2RqWDtBgZwTBOHy3p14Ixg-cgZMdM3y0ciIeIwFCmE9HbPvDQZknYOQgqAZGf5hIkuz8YdBtzJNZlstBep7_-51fkDspeKa-AnOX7KzOL-qX4Emu9CunLv4CVkt4tw
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Medknow Open Access Journals
  dbid: W3E
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwELdgSAgJIb4pDDASErxkS-IkjnmbyqaCtL3AxN4s23FEWesA60D8M_yt3NlJSKpWPCBVUVWfT0nO91X7fkfIS1VWTJcFKJLRZZTV1kYiF1mkBITPGjy4rv0p35Nidpq9P8vPWpAkrIUZ7N9nScz251_ccg8vMmXwuUqupTwRuHw_scPO5BYZD5uSgqcRE4kIGD6bGIzcz7oRHnih9ROSN382uHt9ce4Prw9c0NFtcquNHelBEPYdcsW6u-T6cbs7fo_8DlDErf2iTU1nIMFIuSo6seacHnetcOm7pW9OREP4jd-AiL5VK0UDhDnFFgiwOBtH526NzYdvlwr_MKBTu1jQKTYjcs1SUez7O22cCYhPFKEIYH1V87bG69d9cnp0-HE6i9r-C5HhcfYjYopD9Kg5xoh5XpuA7p5rk_Jc1bwwhU10GWthKqHhJ1WYuNIZh5Q0r2qwHQ_IjmucfUQopDFVWWjwjAbiL6WVSazNStzaqeLMxBOy14lFmhacHHtkLCQkKShH6UX4V44T8rqf8DXgcmwnfY5ylqGwtNdoecC5yBGLOd1K4dHwIWHkE_LKU6DWw30Z1RYvwNMhftaI1z8oBzx3R5Sg12bEaNPwcHa3bGVrdi5kimj_vhh64zBLfH4JKfqEvOiHkTGetHMWlg7QYAsEkXN4bw-DEvQvmEE0Hed4a-VIPXoCxCofj7j5Z49ZnoA3g-wZBP1mpElyGao-twlPMpbJTnse_8_kJ-RGCgFqOIi5S3ZW3y_tUwgoV_qZNyZ_APTseDA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Wolters Kluwer Health
Title Effectiveness of Head-and-Neck Molecular Imaging Reporting and Data System Criterion in Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma PostConcurrent Chemoradiotherapy
URI https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_23_23
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38390552
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2915520997
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3142576191
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3182879573
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10880860
Volume 38
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1tb9MwELbYJiEkhHinMIqRkOBLSl6cOOELGqVlIK1CQEW_WbbjiLI2YVsH7M_wW7mz06ypWk2qoqq-nFLfnX2XOz9HyAuZ5pFKEzAkrVKPFcZ4WZwxT2bgPivYwVVhq3xHyeGYfZrEk8t2QPUEnm0M7bCf1Ph01vt7cvEWDB781x4L_Oj19Gc57-FFhBF8dsieTRZhHR9rUgoJ4y5xmfHQi7Igczg_mxi0tqj1hXplp1qvorz5p8IM99mxLXBf2aaGt8mt2r-kB04h7pBrprxLrh_VGfR75J-DK67XOFoV9BCk7Mky90ZGH9OjZbtc-nFuGxhR56LjNyCi7-VCUgdzTrFNAihwVdJpucbm68m5xJcKtG9mM9rHhkVlNZcUewP3q1I7VCiKcAWgg_m0Pgd2cZ-Mh4Nv_UOv7tHgae6z314kOXiYiqMfGceFdgjwsdIhj2XBE52YQKW-ynSeKfhJJtrPFeMQtsZ5AevLA7JbVqV5RCiEOnmaKNg9NfhoUkkdGMNSTP_kPtN-h_SWYhG6BjDHPhozAYEMylFYEV7KsUNeNTf8ctgd20mfoZyFO3zaWL044DyLEa853EphEfMhqOQd8tJSoK7Cc2lZH3CAf4cYWy1eV1Cu8NxvUYLt6xajTcOrdy_VViwtS4TYEcAemN44HAU2BoUwvkOeN8PIGKvxSgOqAzTYJiGLOczbQ2cEzQRH4HH7MT5a2jKPhgDxzNsj5fSHxTUPYMeDCBsE_aZlSWLuToZuE56IIiaW1vP4Sjk9ITdC8FRdReY-2V2cnpun4FkuVJfs8AmHazr80CV77wajz1-6dhWB6_do8B85NoCN
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1tb9MwELZGJwESQrxTGMxIIPiSLe9OkCY0YFPHtgqhTdo3YzuOCCNJRzum_Rl-Cr-NOzvpmmqFT_tSVfXVSnK-t9zdc4S8FEkWyCQGQVIyccJcayeN0tARKbjPEiy4zE2V7zAeHIafjqKjJfKn7YXBsspWJxpFndUK35Gv-whkbvo8341OHJwahdnVdoSGaEYrZBsGYqxp7NjV52cQwo03dj4Cv1_5_vbWwYeB00wZcBRzw19OIBj4SJKhJxRFubIY5pFUPotEzmIVa08mrkxVlkr4ScTKzWTIIPCKshwkBPa9RpZDfIHSI8vvt4afv7S2IA6ZzZamzHeC1EstuFDoucF68b0q1_CD-wH3g45dnLcOM-ZxvnTz1lmNafXxsamqn7GN23fI7cappZv2FN4lS7q6R67vN2n7--S3xUhuFCutcwomIHNElTmVVse0bGf00qI0U5OoTWXgNyCiWMZKLeY0BS2H8NJ1RYtqbpvxyanANxkUsxFU4ZSkqi4FHdXjCYT9ykJRUTimJRz8rGiaz84fkMMrYdlD0qvqSj8mFOKrLIklmGwFjqGQQnlahwnmnDI3VG6frLVs4apBTcfhHT84RE_IR25YeMHHPnkz_cPIAoYsJl1FPnPb8TpVNXyTsTRCkGh_IYWB6YdIlvXJa0OB6giuS4mmqwLuDoG9Onv9h3Jmz5UOJSgc1dnosuXZf7fHljf6cMwvpPfS5cAzga-Xen3yYrqMG2MJYKXh6AANzmZIIwbP7ZEVgukDDsDNdyO8tKQjHlMCBFHvrlTFNwOm7oGZhbAeGP22I0m8tO2oi5jHgyDkrfQ8-fc9r5Ibg4P9Pb63M9x9Sm764CfbetAV0pv8PNXPwK-dyOeN8qDk61Xrq7-Vk7tH
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness+of+Head-and-Neck+Molecular+Imaging+Reporting+and+Data+System+Criterion+in+Head-and-Neck+Squamous+Cell+Carcinoma+PostConcurrent+Chemoradiotherapy&rft.jtitle=Indian+journal+of+nuclear+medicine&rft.au=Choudhury%2C+Partha+Sarathi&rft.au=Agarwal%2C+Mudit&rft.au=Gupta%2C+Manoj&rft.au=Jajodia%2C+Ankush&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.pub=Medknow+Publications+and+Media+Pvt.+Ltd&rft.issn=0972-3919&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=334&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103%2Fijnm.ijnm_23_23&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=A822901487
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0972-3919&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0972-3919&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0972-3919&client=summon