Anonymity Versus Privacy: Selective Information Sharing in Online Cancer Communities
Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient preferences...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of medical Internet research Vol. 16; no. 5; p. e126 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Canada
Journal of Medical Internet Research
01.05.2014
Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor JMIR Publications Inc JMIR Publications |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1438-8871 1439-4456 1438-8871 |
DOI | 10.2196/jmir.2684 |
Cover
Abstract | Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient preferences around information sharing in online communities remain poorly understood. Consistent with the privacy calculus perspective adopted from e-commerce research, we suggest that patients approach online information sharing instrumentally, weighing privacy costs against participation benefits when deciding whether to share certain information. Consequently, we argue that patients prefer sharing clinical information over daily life and identity information that potentially compromises anonymity. Furthermore, we explore whether patients' prior experiences, age, health, and gender affect perceived privacy costs and thus willingness to share information.
The goal of the present study is to document patient preferences for sharing information within online health platforms.
A total of 115 cancer patients reported sharing intentions for 15 different types of information, demographics, health status, prior privacy experiences, expected community utility, and privacy concerns.
Factor analysis on the 15 information types revealed 3 factors coinciding with 3 proposed information categories: clinical, daily life, and identity information. A within-subject ANOVA showed a strong preference for sharing clinical information compared to daily life and identity information (F1,114=135.59, P=.001, η(2)=.93). Also, adverse online privacy experiences, age, and health status negatively affected information-sharing intentions. Female patients shared information less willingly.
Respondents' information-sharing intentions depend on dispositional and situational factors. Patients share medical details more willingly than daily life or identity information. The results suggest the need to focus on anonymity rather than privacy in online communities. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient preferences around information sharing in online communities remain poorly understood. Consistent with the privacy calculus perspective adopted from e-commerce research, we suggest that patients approach online information sharing instrumentally, weighing privacy costs against participation benefits when deciding whether to share certain information. Consequently, we argue that patients prefer sharing clinical information over daily life and identity information that potentially compromises anonymity. Furthermore, we explore whether patients' prior experiences, age, health, and gender affect perceived privacy costs and thus willingness to share information.
The goal of the present study is to document patient preferences for sharing information within online health platforms.
A total of 115 cancer patients reported sharing intentions for 15 different types of information, demographics, health status, prior privacy experiences, expected community utility, and privacy concerns.
Factor analysis on the 15 information types revealed 3 factors coinciding with 3 proposed information categories: clinical, daily life, and identity information. A within-subject ANOVA showed a strong preference for sharing clinical information compared to daily life and identity information (F1,114=135.59, P=.001, η(2)=.93). Also, adverse online privacy experiences, age, and health status negatively affected information-sharing intentions. Female patients shared information less willingly.
Respondents' information-sharing intentions depend on dispositional and situational factors. Patients share medical details more willingly than daily life or identity information. The results suggest the need to focus on anonymity rather than privacy in online communities. Background: Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient preferences around information sharing in online communities remain poorly understood. Consistent with the privacy calculus perspective adopted from e-commerce research, we suggest that patients approach online information sharing instrumentally, weighing privacy costs against participation benefits when deciding whether to share certain information. Consequently, we argue that patients prefer sharing clinical information over daily life and identity information that potentially compromises anonymity. Furthermore, we explore whether patients' prior experiences, age, health, and gender affect perceived privacy costs and thus willingness to share information. Objective: The goal of the present study is to document patient preferences for sharing information within online health platforms. Methods: A total of 115 cancer patients reported sharing intentions for 15 different types of information, demographics, health status, prior privacy experiences, expected community utility, and privacy concerns. Results: Factor analysis on the 15 information types revealed 3 factors coinciding with 3 proposed information categories: clinical, daily life, and identity information. A within-subject AN OVA showed a strong preference for sharing clinical information compared to daily life and identity information (F1,114=135.59, P=.001, [eta]2=.93). Also, adverse online privacy experiences, age, and health status negatively affected information-sharing intentions. Female patients shared information less willingly. Conclusions: Respondents' information-sharing intentions depend on dispositional and situational factors. Patients share medical details more willingly than daily life or identity information. The results suggest the need to focus on anonymity rather than privacy in online communities. Adapted from the source document. BackgroundActive sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient preferences around information sharing in online communities remain poorly understood. Consistent with the privacy calculus perspective adopted from e-commerce research, we suggest that patients approach online information sharing instrumentally, weighing privacy costs against participation benefits when deciding whether to share certain information. Consequently, we argue that patients prefer sharing clinical information over daily life and identity information that potentially compromises anonymity. Furthermore, we explore whether patients’ prior experiences, age, health, and gender affect perceived privacy costs and thus willingness to share information. ObjectiveThe goal of the present study is to document patient preferences for sharing information within online health platforms. MethodsA total of 115 cancer patients reported sharing intentions for 15 different types of information, demographics, health status, prior privacy experiences, expected community utility, and privacy concerns. ResultsFactor analysis on the 15 information types revealed 3 factors coinciding with 3 proposed information categories: clinical, daily life, and identity information. A within-subject ANOVA showed a strong preference for sharing clinical information compared to daily life and identity information (F1,114=135.59, P=.001, η2=.93). Also, adverse online privacy experiences, age, and health status negatively affected information-sharing intentions. Female patients shared information less willingly. ConclusionsRespondents’ information-sharing intentions depend on dispositional and situational factors. Patients share medical details more willingly than daily life or identity information. The results suggest the need to focus on anonymity rather than privacy in online communities. Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient preferences around information sharing in online communities remain poorly understood. Consistent with the privacy calculus perspective adopted from e-commerce research, we suggest that patients approach online information sharing instrumentally, weighing privacy costs against participation benefits when deciding whether to share certain information. Consequently, we argue that patients prefer sharing clinical information over daily life and identity information that potentially compromises anonymity. Furthermore, we explore whether patients' prior experiences, age, health, and gender affect perceived privacy costs and thus willingness to share information. The goal of the present study is to document patient preferences for sharing information within online health platforms. A total of 115 cancer patients reported sharing intentions for 15 different types of information, demographics, health status, prior privacy experiences, expected community utility, and privacy concerns. Factor analysis on the 15 information types revealed 3 factors coinciding with 3 proposed information categories: clinical, daily life, and identity information. A within-subject ANOVA showed a strong preference for sharing clinical information compared to daily life and identity information (F [sub.1,114]=135.59, P=.001, η[sup.2]=.93). Also, adverse online privacy experiences, age, and health status negatively affected information-sharing intentions. Female patients shared information less willingly. Respondents' information-sharing intentions depend on dispositional and situational factors. Patients share medical details more willingly than daily life or identity information. The results suggest the need to focus on anonymity rather than privacy in online communities. Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient preferences around information sharing in online communities remain poorly understood. Consistent with the privacy calculus perspective adopted from e-commerce research, we suggest that patients approach online information sharing instrumentally, weighing privacy costs against participation benefits when deciding whether to share certain information. Consequently, we argue that patients prefer sharing clinical information over daily life and identity information that potentially compromises anonymity. Furthermore, we explore whether patients' prior experiences, age, health, and gender affect perceived privacy costs and thus willingness to share information.BACKGROUNDActive sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient preferences around information sharing in online communities remain poorly understood. Consistent with the privacy calculus perspective adopted from e-commerce research, we suggest that patients approach online information sharing instrumentally, weighing privacy costs against participation benefits when deciding whether to share certain information. Consequently, we argue that patients prefer sharing clinical information over daily life and identity information that potentially compromises anonymity. Furthermore, we explore whether patients' prior experiences, age, health, and gender affect perceived privacy costs and thus willingness to share information.The goal of the present study is to document patient preferences for sharing information within online health platforms.OBJECTIVEThe goal of the present study is to document patient preferences for sharing information within online health platforms.A total of 115 cancer patients reported sharing intentions for 15 different types of information, demographics, health status, prior privacy experiences, expected community utility, and privacy concerns.METHODSA total of 115 cancer patients reported sharing intentions for 15 different types of information, demographics, health status, prior privacy experiences, expected community utility, and privacy concerns.Factor analysis on the 15 information types revealed 3 factors coinciding with 3 proposed information categories: clinical, daily life, and identity information. A within-subject ANOVA showed a strong preference for sharing clinical information compared to daily life and identity information (F1,114=135.59, P=.001, η(2)=.93). Also, adverse online privacy experiences, age, and health status negatively affected information-sharing intentions. Female patients shared information less willingly.RESULTSFactor analysis on the 15 information types revealed 3 factors coinciding with 3 proposed information categories: clinical, daily life, and identity information. A within-subject ANOVA showed a strong preference for sharing clinical information compared to daily life and identity information (F1,114=135.59, P=.001, η(2)=.93). Also, adverse online privacy experiences, age, and health status negatively affected information-sharing intentions. Female patients shared information less willingly.Respondents' information-sharing intentions depend on dispositional and situational factors. Patients share medical details more willingly than daily life or identity information. The results suggest the need to focus on anonymity rather than privacy in online communities.CONCLUSIONSRespondents' information-sharing intentions depend on dispositional and situational factors. Patients share medical details more willingly than daily life or identity information. The results suggest the need to focus on anonymity rather than privacy in online communities. Background: Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient preferences around information sharing in online communities remain poorly understood. Consistent with the privacy calculus perspective adopted from e-commerce research, we suggest that patients approach online information sharing instrumentally, weighing privacy costs against participation benefits when deciding whether to share certain information. Consequently, we argue that patients prefer sharing clinical information over daily life and identity information that potentially compromises anonymity. Furthermore, we explore whether patients’ prior experiences, age, health, and gender affect perceived privacy costs and thus willingness to share information. Objective: The goal of the present study is to document patient preferences for sharing information within online health platforms. Methods: A total of 115 cancer patients reported sharing intentions for 15 different types of information, demographics, health status, prior privacy experiences, expected community utility, and privacy concerns. Results: Factor analysis on the 15 information types revealed 3 factors coinciding with 3 proposed information categories: clinical, daily life, and identity information. A within-subject ANOVA showed a strong preference for sharing clinical information compared to daily life and identity information (F1,114=135.59, P=.001, η2=.93). Also, adverse online privacy experiences, age, and health status negatively affected information-sharing intentions. Female patients shared information less willingly. Conclusions: Respondents’ information-sharing intentions depend on dispositional and situational factors. Patients share medical details more willingly than daily life or identity information. The results suggest the need to focus on anonymity rather than privacy in online communities. Background Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient preferences around information sharing in online communities remain poorly understood. Consistent with the privacy calculus perspective adopted from e-commerce research, we suggest that patients approach online information sharing instrumentally, weighing privacy costs against participation benefits when deciding whether to share certain information. Consequently, we argue that patients prefer sharing clinical information over daily life and identity information that potentially compromises anonymity. Furthermore, we explore whether patients’ prior experiences, age, health, and gender affect perceived privacy costs and thus willingness to share information. Objective The goal of the present study is to document patient preferences for sharing information within online health platforms. Methods A total of 115 cancer patients reported sharing intentions for 15 different types of information, demographics, health status, prior privacy experiences, expected community utility, and privacy concerns. Results Factor analysis on the 15 information types revealed 3 factors coinciding with 3 proposed information categories: clinical, daily life, and identity information. A within-subject ANOVA showed a strong preference for sharing clinical information compared to daily life and identity information (F [sub.1,114]=135.59, P=.001, η[sup.2]=.93). Also, adverse online privacy experiences, age, and health status negatively affected information-sharing intentions. Female patients shared information less willingly. Conclusions Respondents’ information-sharing intentions depend on dispositional and situational factors. Patients share medical details more willingly than daily life or identity information. The results suggest the need to focus on anonymity rather than privacy in online communities. Background: Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient preferences around information sharing in online communities remain poorly understood. Consistent with the privacy calculus perspective adopted from e-commerce research, we suggest that patients approach online information sharing instrumentally, weighing privacy costs against participation benefits when deciding whether to share certain information. Consequently, we argue that patients prefer sharing clinical information over daily life and identity information that potentially compromises anonymity. Furthermore, we explore whether patientsʼ prior experiences, age, health, and gender affect perceived privacy costs and thus willingness to share information. Objective: The goal of the present study is to document patient preferences for sharing information within online health platforms. Methods: A total of 115 cancer patients reported sharing intentions for 15 different types of information, demographics, health status, prior privacy experiences, expected community utility, and privacy concerns. Results: Factor analysis on the 15 information types revealed 3 factors coinciding with 3 proposed information categories: clinical, daily life, and identity information. A within-subject AN OVA showed a strong preference for sharing clinical information compared to daily life and identity information (F1,114=135.59, P=.001, [eta]2=.93). Also, adverse online privacy experiences, age, and health status negatively affected information-sharing intentions. Female patients shared information less willingly. Conclusions: Respondentsʼ information-sharing intentions depend on dispositional and situational factors. Patients share medical details more willingly than daily life or identity information. The results suggest the need to focus on anonymity rather than privacy in online communities. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Frost, Jeana Beekers, Nienke Vermeulen, Ivar E |
AuthorAffiliation | 2 National IT Institute for Healthcare Amsterdam Netherlands 1 VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 National IT Institute for Healthcare Amsterdam Netherlands – name: 1 VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jeana surname: Frost fullname: Frost, Jeana – sequence: 2 givenname: Ivar E surname: Vermeulen fullname: Vermeulen, Ivar E – sequence: 3 givenname: Nienke surname: Beekers fullname: Beekers, Nienke |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24828114$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkttuEzEQhleoiB7gghdAK3EDSEk9uz5ygRRFHCJVFCmFW8vr9aaOdu3U3g3k7XGa0jZVVeQLW-Nv_hn_nuPswHlnsuw1oHEBgp4uOxvGBeX4WXYEuOQjzhkc3DsfZscxLhEqEBbwIjssMC84AD7KLiZJa9PZfpP_MiEOMf8R7Frpzcd8blqje7s2-cw1PnSqt97l80sVrFvk1uXnrrXO5FPltAn51Hfd4GxvTXyZPW9UG82rm_0k-_nl88X02-js_OtsOjkbaSpYPypJ1SBEFC1pUzFmRClQUzIlgItKca1rTAzjFdSpccpqhWmDKop4Q2ijalGeZLOdbu3VUq6C7VTYSK-svA74sJAq9Fa3RgpUaoEprXFZY8VrAXWZahvSgKLATdL6sNMa3Eptfqu2vRUEJLc2y63Ncmtzgj_t4NVQdabWxvVBtXsd7N84eykXfi0xIsDwVuDdjUDwV4OJvexs1KZtlTN-iBIYcEQIKdn_UVIQRhPNE_r2Abr0Q3DpC2RBoOCCCcBPUUApAYop0DtqoZJ9Nk1AeojelpYTRkVJKGBI1PgRKq3adFanKW1siu8lvN9LSExv_vQLNcQoZ_Pv--yb-y7f2vtveu_EdPAxBtM8-WWnD1ht--uRTh3b9pGMv4SwDEs |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dss_2021_113717 crossref_primary_10_1145_3134726 crossref_primary_10_1108_TQM_04_2019_0096 crossref_primary_10_2196_15585 crossref_primary_10_22720_hnmr_2020_5_2_190 crossref_primary_10_2196_50421 crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_4671 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rbms_2018_10_016 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10799_022_00376_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19159508 crossref_primary_10_2196_26110 crossref_primary_10_20473_brpkm_v4i1_53847 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cose_2023_103572 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2023_1213615 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_copsyc_2016_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1080_17482631_2024_2367841 crossref_primary_10_1145_3415244 crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_3973 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamiaopen_ooz043 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_020_09408_8 crossref_primary_10_1177_1460458219884840 crossref_primary_10_2196_16546 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2017_03_064 crossref_primary_10_1080_0144929X_2019_1709545 crossref_primary_10_2196_publichealth_6872 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40271_020_00417_8 crossref_primary_10_1093_jcmc_zmae023 crossref_primary_10_1177_2055207621997258 crossref_primary_10_1159_000510922 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00761_018_0348_5 crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_9909 crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_3766 crossref_primary_10_1145_3359261 crossref_primary_10_2196_55548 crossref_primary_10_1177_0969733016654315 crossref_primary_10_1080_10410236_2021_2019920 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2022_104781 crossref_primary_10_1108_AJIM_08_2021_0214 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocv175 crossref_primary_10_1080_10919392_2018_1482601 crossref_primary_10_1080_10810730_2019_1688895 crossref_primary_10_1111_bjhp_12571 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jstrokecerebrovasdis_2023_107515 crossref_primary_10_1097_CIN_0000000000000302 crossref_primary_10_2196_41610 crossref_primary_10_2196_cancer_7312 crossref_primary_10_1111_ecc_12982 crossref_primary_10_2196_36432 crossref_primary_10_1002_kpm_1574 crossref_primary_10_1136_rmdopen_2015_000214 crossref_primary_10_2196_medinform_5054 crossref_primary_10_2196_33170 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph191912899 crossref_primary_10_2196_29238 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18084253 |
Cites_doi | 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8775 10.1177/1461444808101618 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.10.3412 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.5151 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000101)88:1<226::AID-CNCR30>3.0.CO;2-P 10.1504/IJIEM.2010.035624 10.1145/2212776.2223806 10.1287/isre.1040.0032 10.1016/j.pec.2003.10.001 10.1287/isre.1060.0080 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00268.x 10.1287/isre.1100.0335 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.016 10.1016/j.dss.2010.01.010 10.2307/40041279 10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.006 10.1016/j.pec.2004.06.006 10.1196/annals.1280.008 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000590 10.1097/00024665-200305000-00010 10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.205 10.1002/1097-0142(19910615)67:12<3131::AID-CNCR2820671232>3.0.CO;2-4 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.024 10.1007/s11136-005-0887-2 10.2196/jmir.992 10.1093/annonc/mdl498 10.1080/01449290410001715723 10.1007/s00520-009-0615-5 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e12 10.1287/isre.13.1.36.97 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.005 10.1080/108107300406866 10.2307/249775 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1148 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.9832 10.2307/41409969 10.2196/jmir.1728 10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.011 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.032 10.1080/15252019.2010.10722168 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2014 Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. Jeana Frost, Ivar E Vermeulen, Nienke Beekers. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 14.05.2014. 2014 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2014 Journal of Medical Internet Research – notice: 2014. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: Jeana Frost, Ivar E Vermeulen, Nienke Beekers. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 14.05.2014. 2014 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISN 7QJ 8BP E3H F2A K9. NAPCQ 3V. 7RV 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ALSLI AZQEC BENPR CCPQU CNYFK DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH KB0 M0S M1O PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PRQQA 7X8 5PM ADTOC UNPAY DOA |
DOI | 10.2196/jmir.2684 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Canada Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Database Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest Central Essentials - QC ProQuest Central ProQuest One Library & Information Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) Library Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Scholarly Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Social Sciences MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content Unpaywall DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Library Science Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Library & Information Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: UNPAY name: Unpaywall url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/ sourceTypes: Open Access Repository – sequence: 5 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Library & Information Science |
EISSN | 1438-8871 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_903c9466d43d4a8d91d3005e5f1a618e 10.2196/jmir.2684 PMC4051744 A769356141 24828114 10_2196_jmir_2684 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .4I .DC 29L 2WC 36B 53G 5GY 5VS 77I 77K 7RV 7X7 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAKPC AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABIVO ABUWG ACGFO ADBBV ADRAZ AEGXH AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV BENPR CCPQU CITATION CNYFK CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAP EBD EBS EJD ELW EMB EMOBN ESX F5P FRP FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO ICO IEA IHR INH ISN ITC KQ8 M1O M48 NAPCQ OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PPXIY PQQKQ PRQQA PUEGO RNS RPM SJN SV3 TR2 UKHRP XSB ACUHS ALIPV CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 7QJ 8BP E3H F2A K9. 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM ADTOC C1A O5R O5S UNPAY WOQ |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c697t-35bf005a636fb77e9390f37a9189ba8ccd45e78b1d02067da46f0b608f56fad93 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1438-8871 1439-4456 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:32:06 EDT 2025 Mon Sep 15 10:08:17 EDT 2025 Tue Sep 30 15:42:59 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 02:40:57 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 13:31:50 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 02:16:39 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 04:55:37 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:21:24 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:19:48 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 04:23:53 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:03:58 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 02:47:12 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:14 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Keywords | privacy anonymity cancer online systems Health 2.0 confidentiality |
Language | English |
License | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. cc-by |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c697t-35bf005a636fb77e9390f37a9189ba8ccd45e78b1d02067da46f0b608f56fad93 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.2196/jmir.2684 |
PMID | 24828114 |
PQID | 2512897914 |
PQPubID | 2033121 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_903c9466d43d4a8d91d3005e5f1a618e unpaywall_primary_10_2196_jmir_2684 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4051744 proquest_miscellaneous_1718055537 proquest_miscellaneous_1525768058 proquest_journals_2512897914 proquest_journals_1665164616 gale_infotracmisc_A769356141 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A769356141 gale_incontextgauss_ISN_A769356141 pubmed_primary_24828114 crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_2684 crossref_citationtrail_10_2196_jmir_2684 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2014-05-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2014 text: 2014-05-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Canada |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Canada – name: Toronto – name: Toronto, Canada |
PublicationTitle | Journal of medical Internet research |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Med Internet Res |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
Publisher | Journal of Medical Internet Research Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor JMIR Publications Inc JMIR Publications |
Publisher_xml | – name: Journal of Medical Internet Research – name: Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor – name: JMIR Publications Inc – name: JMIR Publications |
References | ref37 ref14 ref36 ref31 ref11 Nimrod, G (ref26) 2013; 8 Pavlou, PA (ref1) 2011; 35 Malhotra, NK (ref35) 2004; 15 ref17 ref16 ref38 ref19 Ganz, PA (ref12) 1991; 67 ref18 Demetri, GD (ref13) 1998; 16 Solove, DJ (ref33) 2006; 154 Dinev, T (ref2) 2006; 17 Ferguson, T (ref15) 2004; 328 Song, J (ref41) 2007; 43 Klemm, P (ref20) 2003; 21 ref24 ref46 ref45 ref48 Sanson-Fisher, R (ref10) 2000; 88 ref25 ref42 ref22 ref44 ref21 ref43 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref8 Westin, AF (ref34) 1968; 25 ref7 Nonnecke, B (ref30) 1999 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 Laric, MV (ref39) 2009; 12 ref5 Davison, KP (ref23) 2000; 55 ref40 Anderson, CL (ref47) 2011; 22 Culnan, MJ (ref32) 1993; 17 15476984 - Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Oct;55(1):3-15 18653442 - J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(2):e18 15142894 - BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1148-9 17287242 - Ann Oncol. 2007 Mar;18(3):581-92 16468076 - Qual Life Res. 2006 Mar;15(2):191-201 19884548 - J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6172-9 9779721 - J Clin Oncol. 1998 Oct;16(10):3412-25 1710541 - Cancer. 1991 Jun 15;67(12):3131-5 17513283 - J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(2):e12 19319577 - Support Care Cancer. 2009 Aug;17(8):1117-28 15893206 - Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):250-61 11010346 - J Health Commun. 2000 Apr-Jun;5(2):135-59 14766629 - Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Dec;1000:152-79 10717968 - Am Psychol. 2000 Feb;55(2):205-17 22778322 - J Clin Oncol. 2012 Aug 10;30(23):2897-905 17093275 - J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 10;24(32):5132-7 21846635 - J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e62 10618627 - Cancer. 2000 Jan 1;88(1):226-37 16125453 - Int J Med Inform. 2006 Jan;75(1):8-28 18191527 - Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):315-37 12792194 - Comput Inform Nurs. 2003 May-Jun;21(3):136-42 |
References_xml | – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8775 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1177/1461444808101618 – volume: 16 start-page: 3412 issue: 10 year: 1998 ident: ref13 publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.10.3412 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.5151 – ident: ref5 – volume: 88 start-page: 226 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: ref10 publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000101)88:1<226::AID-CNCR30>3.0.CO;2-P – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1504/IJIEM.2010.035624 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1145/2212776.2223806 – volume: 15 start-page: 336 issue: 4 year: 2004 ident: ref35 publication-title: Information Systems Research doi: 10.1287/isre.1040.0032 – ident: ref43 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.10.001 – volume: 17 start-page: A issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: ref2 publication-title: Information Systems Research doi: 10.1287/isre.1060.0080 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00268.x – volume: 22 start-page: 469 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: ref47 publication-title: Information Systems Research doi: 10.1287/isre.1100.0335 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.016 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2010.01.010 – volume: 154 start-page: 477 issue: 3 year: 2006 ident: ref33 publication-title: University of Pennsylvania Law Review doi: 10.2307/40041279 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.006 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.06.006 – volume: 8 start-page: 30 issue: 1 year: 2013 ident: ref26 publication-title: International Journal of Internet Science – ident: ref45 doi: 10.1196/annals.1280.008 – volume: 25 start-page: 166 issue: 1 year: 1968 ident: ref34 publication-title: Washington and Lee Law Review – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000590 – volume: 21 start-page: 136 issue: 3 year: 2003 ident: ref20 publication-title: Comput Inform Nurs doi: 10.1097/00024665-200305000-00010 – volume: 55 start-page: 205 issue: 2 year: 2000 ident: ref23 publication-title: Am Psychol doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.205 – volume: 67 start-page: 3131 issue: 12 year: 1991 ident: ref12 publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910615)67:12<3131::AID-CNCR2820671232>3.0.CO;2-4 – ident: ref48 doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.024 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-0887-2 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.2196/jmir.992 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl498 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1080/01449290410001715723 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0615-5 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e12 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1287/isre.13.1.36.97 – ident: ref44 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.005 – ident: ref40 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1080/108107300406866 – volume: 17 start-page: 341 issue: 3 year: 1993 ident: ref32 publication-title: MIS Quarterly doi: 10.2307/249775 – volume: 12 start-page: 93 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: ref39 publication-title: Research in Healthcare Financial Management – volume: 328 start-page: 1148 issue: 7449 year: 2004 ident: ref15 publication-title: BMJ: British Medical Journal doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1148 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.9832 – start-page: 123 year: 1999 ident: ref30 publication-title: Ethnographic Studies in Real and Virtual Environments: Inhabited Information Spaces and Connected Communities, Edinburgh – volume: 35 start-page: 977 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: ref1 publication-title: MIS Quarterly doi: 10.2307/41409969 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.2196/jmir.1728 – volume: 43 start-page: 390 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: ref41 publication-title: Decision Support Systems doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.011 – ident: ref46 doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.032 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1080/15252019.2010.10722168 – reference: 12792194 - Comput Inform Nurs. 2003 May-Jun;21(3):136-42 – reference: 15476984 - Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Oct;55(1):3-15 – reference: 17287242 - Ann Oncol. 2007 Mar;18(3):581-92 – reference: 17513283 - J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(2):e12 – reference: 14766629 - Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Dec;1000:152-79 – reference: 9779721 - J Clin Oncol. 1998 Oct;16(10):3412-25 – reference: 16125453 - Int J Med Inform. 2006 Jan;75(1):8-28 – reference: 18653442 - J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(2):e18 – reference: 19884548 - J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6172-9 – reference: 18191527 - Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):315-37 – reference: 22778322 - J Clin Oncol. 2012 Aug 10;30(23):2897-905 – reference: 15142894 - BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1148-9 – reference: 16468076 - Qual Life Res. 2006 Mar;15(2):191-201 – reference: 19319577 - Support Care Cancer. 2009 Aug;17(8):1117-28 – reference: 15893206 - Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):250-61 – reference: 11010346 - J Health Commun. 2000 Apr-Jun;5(2):135-59 – reference: 21846635 - J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e62 – reference: 17093275 - J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 10;24(32):5132-7 – reference: 10618627 - Cancer. 2000 Jan 1;88(1):226-37 – reference: 10717968 - Am Psychol. 2000 Feb;55(2):205-17 – reference: 1710541 - Cancer. 1991 Jun 15;67(12):3131-5 |
SSID | ssj0020491 |
Score | 2.343357 |
Snippet | Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns.... Background Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy... Background: Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy... BackgroundActive sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy... |
SourceID | doaj unpaywall pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | e126 |
SubjectTerms | Activities of daily living Analysis of Variance Anonymity Cancer Care and treatment Clinical information Community Computer Security Computerized medical records Confidentiality Cost benefit analysis Costs Electronic Health Records Expected values Factor analysis Female Gender Health aspects Health costs Health information Health status Humans Identity Information communication Information Dissemination Information sharing Information systems Interdisciplinary aspects Internet Interpersonal Relations Male Medical prognosis Medical records Medical research Medicine, Experimental Middle Aged Neoplasms Online health care information services Original Paper Patients Personal health Personal information Privacy Privacy, Right of Regression Analysis Safety and security measures Self-Help Groups - ethics Situational factors Social networks Treatment preferences User generated content Virtual communities Weighing Women |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQD8AFlfLa0iLzEHAJjTeOH9xKRVWQWiG1lXqz7NhuFy1ptbsB9d8zk3ijDRS4cI0njjMPz0wy_oaQV4VwY-c4zwoVbcZj0JmTvsxCsCFXwbvYAs8fHomDU_75rDxbafWFNWEdPHDHuB2dFxVioHteeG6V18wjwnooI7OCqYC7L7ixZTKVUi2Ie1mHIwQWKXa-fpvM3iGuycD7tCD9v2_FK77o1zrJO019Za9_2Ol0xQntr5N7KXqku92q75Nbod4g2-nsAX1N0-EiZDZNVrtBbh-m_-cPyEmX7UPkTfFDWTOnX2aT77a6fk-P24Y4sPcNJ7mw-OGPTmragZLSPVSTGU0HSxCO9SE53f94sneQpb4KWSW0XGRF6SKw0IpCRCdl0IXOYyGtZko7q6rK8zJI5ZjPEdzdWy5i7kSuYimi9bp4RNZgteEJocKGmIcy8CghFMu581F5mEJWFfjEsRqRt0t-myqBjmPvi6mB5ANFY1A0BkUzIi960qsOaeMmog8otJ4AwbHbC6AyJqmM-ZfKwJNQ5AbhL2qsrzm3zXxuPh0fmV1sDYngqGxE3iSieAkrrmw6rgDvjYhZA8qtASXYZzUcXmqWSfvD3DAhSkR2Y-LGYQw6lZaawQs_74dxYiyJq8NlA1OUba6Yl-ovNBB5IKJbIUfkcafLPevGHJJthk-QAy0f8HY4Uk8uWgBy3uKbw50ve3v4s8g2_4fInpK7EKnyrtJ0i6wtZk3Yhmhw4Z61hv8ToMVfAA priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Jb9QwFLagSMAFQdkCLTKLgEvaeOJ44YJKRVWQWiG1leZmeW0HDZlhFlD_PX6JJ22g9Bq_OInf7jx_D6E3JTMDYyjNSxF0ToOXueGuyr3XvhDemdAAzx8csv0T-nVYDdOG2zyVVa5sYmOo3cTCHvk2-GEhuST04_RnDl2j4O9qaqFxE90iMVQBqebDi4QrRr-kRROKesm2v_8YzbYA3aTngxqo_n8N8iWP9He15J1lPdXnv_V4fMkV7d1H91IMiXdapj9AN3y9jjbTCQT8FqcjRrDkOOnuOrp9kP6iP0THbc4f428M22XLOf42G_3S9vwDPmra4kQL2J_kTMP2Hx7VuIUmxbsgLDOcjpcAKOsjdLL3-Xh3P0_dFXLLJF_kZWVCVEHNShYM516Wsggl15IIabSw1tHKc2GIKwDi3WnKQmFYIULFgnayfIzW4tv6pwgz7UPhK08DjwFZQY0LwsUpuLXRMw5Eht6v1lvZBD0OHTDGKqYgwBoFrFHAmgy96kinLd7GVUSfgGkdAUBkNxcms1OVNE7JorQAnu9o6agWThIH0Py-CkQzInx8ErBcAQhGDVU2p3o5n6svR4dqBxpEAkQqydC7RBQm8Y2tTocW4ncDblaPcqNHGbXU9odXkqWSlZgrwlgF-G6EXTl8IfIZetkNw8RQGFf7yTJOUTUZY1GJa2hi_AG4biXP0JNWlrulG9CYchN4Au9JeW9t-yP16KyBIacNynm883WnD_9n2bPrP_A5uhsjUdpWkm6gtcVs6TdjtLcwLxqV_gOjzFcx priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Unpaywall dbid: UNPAY link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELdGJwEvfIyvwoY8QLCXlKRxHJu3MjENpFWTtkrjKfInK5RsahvQ-Ou5S9zSjDHxVtUXJ77zzz7bdz8T8irluq81Y1EqvIqYdzLSuc0i55SLhbPa18TzB0O-P2KfTrKTNbK9yIVZOb8HLPG3X7-Ppz1kJLlB1jmeIXXI-mh4OPhcZw0BWAEkSfNbRgy8gYY9qP1sa86pqfn_HoBXZqDL0ZG3qvJcXfxUk8nK1LN3908CTxNx8q1XzXXP_LrE53htq-6RO8HxpIOmp9wna67cIFshbYG-piEvCe1EA-A3yM2DcPT-gBw3GwXgtFPcY6tm9HA6_qHMxTt6VN-lA8Nmu5JThXuGdFzShs-U7mIPm9KQk4JMrg_JaO_D8e5-FK5kiAyX-TxKM-0Bt4qn3Os8dzKVsU9zJRMhtRLGWJa5XOjExsgLbxXjPtY8Fj7jXlmZPiId-Fr3hFCunI9d5pjPwYuLmbZeWKgiNwam077okp2F0QoT-Mrx2oxJAesW1GKBWixQi13yYil63pB0XCX0Hi2_FEBe7foPMEwRYFrIODXIuG9ZapkSViYW-fxd5hPFE-HgTdhvCmTOKDE054uqZrPi49GwGOCtksirmnTJmyDkz-CLjQqZDtBuJNtqSW62JAHapl286J5FGFpmRcJ5hqRwCb-yGP1VIXOZQIO3l8VYMUbTle6sgiqyepkZZ-IaGXBakAwuzbvkcQOIper6DNbpCb4hb0Glpdt2STk-rbnLWU2NDk--XILq3yZ7-l9Sz8ht8GJZE4W6STrzaeW2wFOc6-dhrPgNMvNmlw priority: 102 providerName: Unpaywall |
Title | Anonymity Versus Privacy: Selective Information Sharing in Online Cancer Communities |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24828114 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1665164616 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2512897914 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1525768058 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1718055537 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4051744 https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2684 https://doaj.org/article/903c9466d43d4a8d91d3005e5f1a618e |
UnpaywallVersion | publishedVersion |
Volume | 16 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1439-4456 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 19990101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1439-4456 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 19990101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVEBS databaseName: EBSCOhost Academic Search Ultimate customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1439-4456 databaseCode: ABDBF dateStart: 20050101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn providerName: EBSCOhost – providerCode: PRVBFR databaseName: Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1439-4456 databaseCode: DIK dateStart: 19990101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com providerName: Flying Publisher – providerCode: PRVFQY databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1439-4456 databaseCode: GX1 dateStart: 19990101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research – providerCode: PRVAQN databaseName: PubMed Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1439-4456 databaseCode: RPM dateStart: 19990101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ providerName: National Library of Medicine – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1439-4456 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Library Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1439-4456 databaseCode: M1O dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/libraryscience providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1439-4456 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVFZP databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 20250131 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1439-4456 databaseCode: M48 dateStart: 20100201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://journals.scholarsportal.info providerName: Scholars Portal |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELf2IQEvCMZXYavMh4CXjKRx7AQJoW7aNJBaKrZK3VNkx_ZWVNKRtkD_e-4SN1qg8MBLHnKXS-K7s-_88TtCXoRcdZRizAtjKz1mTeIpoSPPGGn82GhlS-D5Xp-fDNnHUTTaIKsam64BZ2tTO6wnNSwm-z-_Ld-Dw7_DbcxgQG--fB0X-4haskm2YUDqoHH3WL2Y0IEguMy7GC56QsBQAQw1H0VQYAbZRxCwxghVAvn_2V1fG69-30t5c5FfyeUPOZlcG6iO75DbLsKk3cok7pINk--QPXc-gb6k7gASKoQ6z94hN3pujf0eOatmBCA6pziZtpjRQTH-LrPlW3paFs2B_rEp5FLi5CAd57QCLqWHaEoFdYdPELL1PhkeH50dnniu9oKX8UTMvTBSFhxU8pBbJYRJwsS3oZBJECdKxlmmWWRErALtIwC8loxbX3E_thG3UifhA7IFX2seEcqlsb6JDLMCwjWfKW1jDSJElsG42Ylb5PWqvdPMAZNjfYxJCgkKailFLaWopRZ5VrNeVWgc65gOUGk1AwJolzemxUXq_DFN_DBDaH3NQs1krJNAI3C_iWwgeRAbeBOqPEWIjBz34FzIxWyWfjjtp10sH4kAqkGLvHJMdgpfnEl3pAH-G1G1Gpy7DU7w4axJXllWunKBNOA8QvS3gK8lY2AaJyIJ4Ief1mQUjNvmcjNdgIiozCf9KP4HD0QniPoWihZ5WNly3XQrl2gR0bDyRts2Kfn4sgQpZyUGOjz5vPaHv6vs8X_Lf0JuQQjLqi2ou2RrXizMHoSJc9Umm2Ik2mT74Kg_-NwuJ1vg2gs-tcvuASjD_qB7_gsf9W50 |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELemITFeEIyvwgbmm5ewpHEcBwmhMZhatk5I66S-GTu2t6KSln4w9Z_ib-QucbsFxt72Gl-cxHe-D-fud4S8iLluas1YEAunAuZsFujUJIG1yobCGu1K4PnOAW8dsS-9pLdCfi9qYTCtcqETS0VthjmekW-hHRZZmkXsw-hngF2j8O_qooVGJRZ7dn4KIdvkffsT8Pdls7n7ubvTCnxXgSDnWToN4kQ7ED3FY-50mtoMon4XpyqLRKaVyHPDEpsKHZkQoc2NYtyFmofCJdwpg-BLoPKvsThkiNWf9s4CPPC2owq9CPQA3_r-oz9-i2gqNZtXtgb41wCcs4B_Z2euzYqRmp-qweCc6du9RW56n5VuV0J2m6zYYp1s-ooH-or6kiZkMfW6Yp1c7_i_9ndItzpjAH-f4vHcbEK_jvu_VD5_Rw_LNjygceuTnCg8bqT9glZQqHQHhXNMfTkLgsDeJUdXsu73yCq8rX1AKFfWhTaxzKXgAIZMGycMTJHmOVjipmiQN4v1lrmHOseOGwMJIQ-yRiJrJLKmQZ4tSUcVvsdFRB-RaUsChOQuLwzHx9LvcJmFcY5g_YbFhilhsshgKwCbuEjxSFh4ErJcIuhGgVk9x2o2mcj24YHcxoaUCMkaNchrT-SG8Ma58kUS8N2I01Wj3KhRglbI68MLyZJeK01kxHmCeHIRv3D4bIs1yNPlME6MiXiFHc5giqSMUMNEXEID_g7iyMVpg9yvZHm5dE0GIX6ET0hrUl5b2_pI0T8pYc9ZiaoOdz5f7of_s-zh5R_4hKy1up19ud8-2HtEboAXzKos1g2yOh3P7CZ4mlP9uNzelHy7an3yB_ywlAM |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELemIQ1eEIyvwgbmey-hSePYDhJCY2NaGasmbZP6FuzY3opKWvrB1H-Nv467xO0WGHvba3xxEt_5Ppy73xHyKua6pTVjQSydCpizaaCFSQJrlQ2lNdqVwPP7Hb57zL50k-4S-T2vhcG0yrlOLBW1GeR4Rt5EOyxTkUas6XxaxMH2zsfhzwA7SOGf1nk7jUpE9uzsDMK38Yf2NvD6dau18_loazfwHQaCnKdiEsSJdiCGisfcaSFsGqehi4VKI5lqJfPcsMQKqSMTIsy5UYy7UPNQuoQ7ZRCICdT_DRGzGNPJRPc82APPO6qQjEAn8Ob3H73RO0RWqdm_sk3Av8bggjX8O1Pz5rQYqtmZ6vcvmMGdO-S291_pZiVwd8mSLVbJuq9-oG-oL29CdlOvN1bJyr7_g3-PHFXnDeD7Uzyqm47pwaj3S-Wz9_SwbMkD2rc-yanCo0faK2gFi0q3UFBH1Je2ICDsfXJ8Lev-gCzD29pHhHJlXWgTy5wAZzBk2jhpYAqR52CVW7JBNubrneUe9hy7b_QzCH-QNRmyJkPWNMiLBemwwvq4jOgTMm1BgPDc5YXB6CTzuz1LwzhH4H7DYsOUNGlksC2ATVykeCQtPAlZniEAR4GifKKm43HWPuxkm9icEuFZowZ564ncAN44V75gAr4bMbtqlGs1StAQeX14LlmZ11DjLOI8QWy5iF86fL7dGuT5YhgnxqS8wg6mMEVSRqthIq-gAd8HMeVi0SAPK1leLF2LQbgf4RNETcpra1sfKXqnJQQ6KxHW4c6Xi_3wf5Y9vvoDn5EV0CTZ13Zn7wm5BQ4xqxJa18jyZDS16-B0TvTTcndT8u261ckf7xaYPg |
linkToUnpaywall | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELdGJwEvfIyvwoY8QLCXlKRxHJu3MjENpFWTtkrjKfInK5RsahvQ-Ou5S9zSjDHxVtUXJ77zzz7bdz8T8irluq81Y1EqvIqYdzLSuc0i55SLhbPa18TzB0O-P2KfTrKTNbK9yIVZOb8HLPG3X7-Ppz1kJLlB1jmeIXXI-mh4OPhcZw0BWAEkSfNbRgy8gYY9qP1sa86pqfn_HoBXZqDL0ZG3qvJcXfxUk8nK1LN3908CTxNx8q1XzXXP_LrE53htq-6RO8HxpIOmp9wna67cIFshbYG-piEvCe1EA-A3yM2DcPT-gBw3GwXgtFPcY6tm9HA6_qHMxTt6VN-lA8Nmu5JThXuGdFzShs-U7mIPm9KQk4JMrg_JaO_D8e5-FK5kiAyX-TxKM-0Bt4qn3Os8dzKVsU9zJRMhtRLGWJa5XOjExsgLbxXjPtY8Fj7jXlmZPiId-Fr3hFCunI9d5pjPwYuLmbZeWKgiNwam077okp2F0QoT-Mrx2oxJAesW1GKBWixQi13yYil63pB0XCX0Hi2_FEBe7foPMEwRYFrIODXIuG9ZapkSViYW-fxd5hPFE-HgTdhvCmTOKDE054uqZrPi49GwGOCtksirmnTJmyDkz-CLjQqZDtBuJNtqSW62JAHapl286J5FGFpmRcJ5hqRwCb-yGP1VIXOZQIO3l8VYMUbTle6sgiqyepkZZ-IaGXBakAwuzbvkcQOIper6DNbpCb4hb0Glpdt2STk-rbnLWU2NDk--XILq3yZ7-l9Sz8ht8GJZE4W6STrzaeW2wFOc6-dhrPgNMvNmlw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anonymity+Versus+Privacy%3A+Selective+Information+Sharing+in+Online+Cancer+Communities&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+medical+Internet+research&rft.au=Frost%2C+Jeana&rft.au=Vermeulen%2C+Ivar+E&rft.au=Beekers%2C+Nienke&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.pub=JMIR+Publications+Inc&rft.issn=1439-4456&rft.eissn=1438-8871&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196%2Fjmir.2684&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F24828114&rft.externalDocID=PMC4051744 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon |