Adherence to the iDSI reference case among published cost-per-DALY averted studies

The iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study assesses whether the development of the guideline is associated with an improvement in methodological and reporting practices for CEAs using disabilit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 14; no. 5; p. e0205633
Main Authors Emerson, Joanna, Panzer, Ari, Cohen, Joshua T., Chalkidou, Kalipso, Teerawattananon, Yot, Sculpher, Mark, Wilkinson, Thomas, Walker, Damian, Neumann, Peter J., Kim, David D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 01.05.2019
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0205633

Cover

Abstract The iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study assesses whether the development of the guideline is associated with an improvement in methodological and reporting practices for CEAs using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). We analyzed the Tufts Medical Center Global Health CEA Registry to identify cost-per-DALY averted studies published from 2011 to 2017. Among each of 11 principles in the iDSI reference case, we translated all methodological specifications and reporting standards into a series of binary questions (satisfied or not satisfied) and awarded articles one point for each item satisfied. We then calculated methodological and reporting adherence scores separately as a percentage of total possible points, measured as normalized adherence score (0% = no adherence; 100% = full adherence). Using the year 2014 as the dissemination period, we conducted a pre-post analysis. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using: 1) optional criteria in scoring, 2) alternate dissemination period (2014-2015), and 3) alternative comparator classification. Articles averaged 60% adherence to methodological specifications and 74% adherence to reporting standards. While methodological adherence scores did not significantly improve (59% pre-2014 vs. 60% post-2014, p = 0.53), reporting adherence scores increased slightly over time (72% pre-2014 vs. 75% post-2014, p<0.01). Overall, reporting adherence scores exceeded methodological adherence scores (74% vs. 60%, p<0.001). Articles seldom addressed budget impact (9% reporting, 10% methodological) or equity (7% reporting, 7% methodological). The iDSI reference case has substantial potential to serve as a useful resource for researchers and policy-makers in global health settings, but greater effort to promote adherence and awareness is needed to achieve its potential.
AbstractList The iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study assesses whether the development of the guideline is associated with an improvement in methodological and reporting practices for CEAs using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). We analyzed the Tufts Medical Center Global Health CEA Registry to identify cost-per-DALY averted studies published from 2011 to 2017. Among each of 11 principles in the iDSI reference case, we translated all methodological specifications and reporting standards into a series of binary questions (satisfied or not satisfied) and awarded articles one point for each item satisfied. We then calculated methodological and reporting adherence scores separately as a percentage of total possible points, measured as normalized adherence score (0% = no adherence; 100% = full adherence). Using the year 2014 as the dissemination period, we conducted a pre-post analysis. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using: 1) optional criteria in scoring, 2) alternate dissemination period (2014-2015), and 3) alternative comparator classification. Articles averaged 60% adherence to methodological specifications and 74% adherence to reporting standards. While methodological adherence scores did not significantly improve (59% pre-2014 vs. 60% post-2014, p = 0.53), reporting adherence scores increased slightly over time (72% pre-2014 vs. 75% post-2014, p<0.01). Overall, reporting adherence scores exceeded methodological adherence scores (74% vs. 60%, p<0.001). Articles seldom addressed budget impact (9% reporting, 10% methodological) or equity (7% reporting, 7% methodological). The iDSI reference case has substantial potential to serve as a useful resource for researchers and policy-makers in global health settings, but greater effort to promote adherence and awareness is needed to achieve its potential.
The iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study assesses whether the development of the guideline is associated with an improvement in methodological and reporting practices for CEAs using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). We analyzed the Tufts Medical Center Global Health CEA Registry to identify cost-per-DALY averted studies published from 2011 to 2017. Among each of 11 principles in the iDSI reference case, we translated all methodological specifications and reporting standards into a series of binary questions (satisfied or not satisfied) and awarded articles one point for each item satisfied. We then calculated methodological and reporting adherence scores separately as a percentage of total possible points, measured as normalized adherence score (0% = no adherence; 100% = full adherence). Using the year 2014 as the dissemination period, we conducted a pre-post analysis. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using: 1) optional criteria in scoring, 2) alternate dissemination period (2014-2015), and 3) alternative comparator classification. Articles averaged 60% adherence to methodological specifications and 74% adherence to reporting standards. While methodological adherence scores did not significantly improve (59% pre-2014 vs. 60% post-2014, p = 0.53), reporting adherence scores increased slightly over time (72% pre-2014 vs. 75% post-2014, p<0.01). Overall, reporting adherence scores exceeded methodological adherence scores (74% vs. 60%, p<0.001). Articles seldom addressed budget impact (9% reporting, 10% methodological) or equity (7% reporting, 7% methodological). The iDSI reference case has substantial potential to serve as a useful resource for researchers and policy-makers in global health settings, but greater effort to promote adherence and awareness is needed to achieve its potential.
Background The iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study assesses whether the development of the guideline is associated with an improvement in methodological and reporting practices for CEAs using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Methods We analyzed the Tufts Medical Center Global Health CEA Registry to identify cost-per-DALY averted studies published from 2011 to 2017. Among each of 11 principles in the iDSI reference case, we translated all methodological specifications and reporting standards into a series of binary questions (satisfied or not satisfied) and awarded articles one point for each item satisfied. We then calculated methodological and reporting adherence scores separately as a percentage of total possible points, measured as normalized adherence score (0% = no adherence; 100% = full adherence). Using the year 2014 as the dissemination period, we conducted a pre-post analysis. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using: 1) optional criteria in scoring, 2) alternate dissemination period (2014-2015), and 3) alternative comparator classification. Results Articles averaged 60% adherence to methodological specifications and 74% adherence to reporting standards. While methodological adherence scores did not significantly improve (59% pre-2014 vs. 60% post-2014, p = 0.53), reporting adherence scores increased slightly over time (72% pre-2014 vs. 75% post-2014, p<0.01). Overall, reporting adherence scores exceeded methodological adherence scores (74% vs. 60%, p<0.001). Articles seldom addressed budget impact (9% reporting, 10% methodological) or equity (7% reporting, 7% methodological). Conclusions The iDSI reference case has substantial potential to serve as a useful resource for researchers and policy-makers in global health settings, but greater effort to promote adherence and awareness is needed to achieve its potential.
BackgroundThe iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study assesses whether the development of the guideline is associated with an improvement in methodological and reporting practices for CEAs using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs).MethodsWe analyzed the Tufts Medical Center Global Health CEA Registry to identify cost-per-DALY averted studies published from 2011 to 2017. Among each of 11 principles in the iDSI reference case, we translated all methodological specifications and reporting standards into a series of binary questions (satisfied or not satisfied) and awarded articles one point for each item satisfied. We then calculated methodological and reporting adherence scores separately as a percentage of total possible points, measured as normalized adherence score (0% = no adherence; 100% = full adherence). Using the year 2014 as the dissemination period, we conducted a pre-post analysis. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using: 1) optional criteria in scoring, 2) alternate dissemination period (2014-2015), and 3) alternative comparator classification.ResultsArticles averaged 60% adherence to methodological specifications and 74% adherence to reporting standards. While methodological adherence scores did not significantly improve (59% pre-2014 vs. 60% post-2014, p = 0.53), reporting adherence scores increased slightly over time (72% pre-2014 vs. 75% post-2014, p<0.01). Overall, reporting adherence scores exceeded methodological adherence scores (74% vs. 60%, p<0.001). Articles seldom addressed budget impact (9% reporting, 10% methodological) or equity (7% reporting, 7% methodological).ConclusionsThe iDSI reference case has substantial potential to serve as a useful resource for researchers and policy-makers in global health settings, but greater effort to promote adherence and awareness is needed to achieve its potential.
Background The iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study assesses whether the development of the guideline is associated with an improvement in methodological and reporting practices for CEAs using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Methods We analyzed the Tufts Medical Center Global Health CEA Registry to identify cost-per-DALY averted studies published from 2011 to 2017. Among each of 11 principles in the iDSI reference case, we translated all methodological specifications and reporting standards into a series of binary questions (satisfied or not satisfied) and awarded articles one point for each item satisfied. We then calculated methodological and reporting adherence scores separately as a percentage of total possible points, measured as normalized adherence score (0% = no adherence; 100% = full adherence). Using the year 2014 as the dissemination period, we conducted a pre-post analysis. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using: 1) optional criteria in scoring, 2) alternate dissemination period (2014–2015), and 3) alternative comparator classification. Results Articles averaged 60% adherence to methodological specifications and 74% adherence to reporting standards. While methodological adherence scores did not significantly improve (59% pre-2014 vs. 60% post-2014, p = 0.53), reporting adherence scores increased slightly over time (72% pre-2014 vs. 75% post-2014, p<0.01). Overall, reporting adherence scores exceeded methodological adherence scores (74% vs. 60%, p<0.001). Articles seldom addressed budget impact (9% reporting, 10% methodological) or equity (7% reporting, 7% methodological). Conclusions The iDSI reference case has substantial potential to serve as a useful resource for researchers and policy-makers in global health settings, but greater effort to promote adherence and awareness is needed to achieve its potential.
The iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study assesses whether the development of the guideline is associated with an improvement in methodological and reporting practices for CEAs using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs).BACKGROUNDThe iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study assesses whether the development of the guideline is associated with an improvement in methodological and reporting practices for CEAs using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs).We analyzed the Tufts Medical Center Global Health CEA Registry to identify cost-per-DALY averted studies published from 2011 to 2017. Among each of 11 principles in the iDSI reference case, we translated all methodological specifications and reporting standards into a series of binary questions (satisfied or not satisfied) and awarded articles one point for each item satisfied. We then calculated methodological and reporting adherence scores separately as a percentage of total possible points, measured as normalized adherence score (0% = no adherence; 100% = full adherence). Using the year 2014 as the dissemination period, we conducted a pre-post analysis. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using: 1) optional criteria in scoring, 2) alternate dissemination period (2014-2015), and 3) alternative comparator classification.METHODSWe analyzed the Tufts Medical Center Global Health CEA Registry to identify cost-per-DALY averted studies published from 2011 to 2017. Among each of 11 principles in the iDSI reference case, we translated all methodological specifications and reporting standards into a series of binary questions (satisfied or not satisfied) and awarded articles one point for each item satisfied. We then calculated methodological and reporting adherence scores separately as a percentage of total possible points, measured as normalized adherence score (0% = no adherence; 100% = full adherence). Using the year 2014 as the dissemination period, we conducted a pre-post analysis. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using: 1) optional criteria in scoring, 2) alternate dissemination period (2014-2015), and 3) alternative comparator classification.Articles averaged 60% adherence to methodological specifications and 74% adherence to reporting standards. While methodological adherence scores did not significantly improve (59% pre-2014 vs. 60% post-2014, p = 0.53), reporting adherence scores increased slightly over time (72% pre-2014 vs. 75% post-2014, p<0.01). Overall, reporting adherence scores exceeded methodological adherence scores (74% vs. 60%, p<0.001). Articles seldom addressed budget impact (9% reporting, 10% methodological) or equity (7% reporting, 7% methodological).RESULTSArticles averaged 60% adherence to methodological specifications and 74% adherence to reporting standards. While methodological adherence scores did not significantly improve (59% pre-2014 vs. 60% post-2014, p = 0.53), reporting adherence scores increased slightly over time (72% pre-2014 vs. 75% post-2014, p<0.01). Overall, reporting adherence scores exceeded methodological adherence scores (74% vs. 60%, p<0.001). Articles seldom addressed budget impact (9% reporting, 10% methodological) or equity (7% reporting, 7% methodological).The iDSI reference case has substantial potential to serve as a useful resource for researchers and policy-makers in global health settings, but greater effort to promote adherence and awareness is needed to achieve its potential.CONCLUSIONSThe iDSI reference case has substantial potential to serve as a useful resource for researchers and policy-makers in global health settings, but greater effort to promote adherence and awareness is needed to achieve its potential.
Audience Academic
Author Emerson, Joanna
Cohen, Joshua T.
Chalkidou, Kalipso
Kim, David D.
Neumann, Peter J.
Sculpher, Mark
Wilkinson, Thomas
Panzer, Ari
Teerawattananon, Yot
Walker, Damian
AuthorAffiliation University of Exeter, UNITED KINGDOM
2 Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
3 The Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
5 Health Economics Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
4 Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom
6 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, United States of America
1 Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 3 The Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
– name: 1 Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
– name: 4 Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom
– name: 2 Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
– name: University of Exeter, UNITED KINGDOM
– name: 5 Health Economics Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
– name: 6 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, United States of America
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Joanna
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1199-582X
  surname: Emerson
  fullname: Emerson, Joanna
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ari
  surname: Panzer
  fullname: Panzer, Ari
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Joshua T.
  surname: Cohen
  fullname: Cohen, Joshua T.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Kalipso
  surname: Chalkidou
  fullname: Chalkidou, Kalipso
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Yot
  surname: Teerawattananon
  fullname: Teerawattananon, Yot
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Mark
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3746-9913
  surname: Sculpher
  fullname: Sculpher, Mark
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Thomas
  surname: Wilkinson
  fullname: Wilkinson, Thomas
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Damian
  surname: Walker
  fullname: Walker, Damian
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Peter J.
  surname: Neumann
  fullname: Neumann, Peter J.
– sequence: 10
  givenname: David D.
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, David D.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31042714$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNk12L1DAUhousuB_6D0QLguhFx6Rp0sYLYdj1Y2BgYVcFr0KanE6zdJoxSRf992Z2OjJdFpFetLx93jc5h3NOk6Pe9pAkzzGaYVLidzd2cL3sZpsoz1COKCPkUXKCOckzliNydPB9nJx6f4MQJRVjT5JjglGRl7g4Sa7mugUHvYI02DS0kJqL60XqoBlVJT2kcm37VboZ6s74FnSqrA_ZBlx2MV_-SOUtuBBVHwZtwD9NHjey8_BsfJ8l3z59_Hr-JVtefl6cz5eZYjwPWcErTlVOQeMKkGoKDCoHTnjT5FITpjWSkkkoNaGU0QKqsqoUY2XNKOJlRc6Sl7vcTWe9GNvhRZ5jTjkhaEssdoS28kZsnFlL91tYacSdYN1KSBeM6kDUqqmkrsuK8rpgja4lJhKVuMI5QzUuYtaH8bShXoNW0Acnu0no9E9vWrGyt4IVnJQ5jgFvxgBnfw7gg1gbr6DrZA92uLt3xTlnmEX01T304epGaiVjAaZvbDxXbUPFnFYFpgiXKFKzB6j4aFgbFWenMVGfGN5ODJEJ8Cus5OC9WFxf_T97-X3Kvj5gW5BdaL3thmBs76fgi8NO_23xfmgj8H4HKGe9j6MqlAlymxNLM53ASGw3ZN80sd0QMW5INBf3zPv8f9r-AI4-Erk
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lansea_2023_100184
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40273_020_00916_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jval_2021_10_008
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4147505
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2021_067975
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40273_021_01112_8
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_021_02204_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10198_021_01426_6
crossref_primary_10_1080_13696998_2021_2014721
crossref_primary_10_2217_cer_2019_0119
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jval_2021_11_1351
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_021_07460_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpopen_2021_100063
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_17012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinthera_2022_01_011
crossref_primary_10_18553_jmcp_2022_28_2_146
crossref_primary_10_1002_hec_4029
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jval_2020_10_010
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_021_12491_0
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12962_023_00471_7
crossref_primary_10_18553_jmcp_2022_cheers
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40258_021_00704_x
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0266462321001732
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0266462321000404
crossref_primary_10_1080_14737167_2023_2280213
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2019_036475
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
10.1001/jama.1996.03540140060028
10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(200004)9:3<235::AID-HEC502>3.0.CO;2-O
10.1016/j.gheart.2012.01.007
10.1001/jama.1996.03540150055031
10.1002/hec.3312
10.1093/oxrep/grv020
10.1001/jama.2016.12195
10.1002/hec.3321
10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002
10.2471/BLT.15.155721
10.1371/journal.pone.0123853
10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.015
10.12688/gatesopenres.12786.1
10.1186/1471-2458-5-130
10.1136/bmj.329.7459.224
10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.022
10.1186/s12916-014-0216-0
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science
2019 Emerson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
2019 Emerson et al 2019 Emerson et al
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science
– notice: 2019 Emerson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: 2019 Emerson et al 2019 Emerson et al
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
IOV
ISR
3V.
7QG
7QL
7QO
7RV
7SN
7SS
7T5
7TG
7TM
7U9
7X2
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8C1
8FD
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABJCF
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
ARAPS
ATCPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
C1K
CCPQU
D1I
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
H94
HCIFZ
K9.
KB.
KB0
KL.
L6V
LK8
M0K
M0S
M1P
M7N
M7P
M7S
NAPCQ
P5Z
P62
P64
PATMY
PDBOC
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PTHSS
PYCSY
RC3
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0205633
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints
Gale In Context: Science
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Ecology Abstracts
Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
Immunology Abstracts
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Nucleic Acids Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Agricultural Science Collection
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Public Health Database
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Agricultural & Environmental Science Database
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
Natural Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One
ProQuest Materials Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
Proquest Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Materials Science Database
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Biological Sciences
Agricultural Science Database
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Medical Database
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biological Science Database
Engineering Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Science Database
Materials Science Collection
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
Engineering Collection
Environmental Science Collection
Genetics Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Agricultural Science Database
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Nucleic Acids Abstracts
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Central China
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
Health Research Premium Collection
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Natural Science Collection
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Engineering Collection
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Engineering Database
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
Ecology Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Science Collection
Entomology Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Environmental Science Database
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Technology Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
Materials Science Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Genetics Abstracts
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Materials Science Database
ProQuest Materials Science Collection
ProQuest Public Health
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest SciTech Collection
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Medical Library
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
Immunology Abstracts
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE




Agricultural Science Database



MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Sciences (General)
Public Health
DocumentTitleAlternate CEA adherence to the iDSI reference case
EISSN 1932-6203
ExternalDocumentID 2219593308
oai_doaj_org_article_bcf8adb7859b46fdba13a07181260b14
PMC6493721
A584150170
31042714
10_1371_journal_pone_0205633
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations United Kingdom--UK
United States--US
South Africa
GeographicLocations_xml – name: South Africa
– name: United Kingdom--UK
– name: United States--US
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Medical Research Council
  grantid: MR/R015600/1
– fundername: ;
  grantid: OPP1171680
GroupedDBID ---
123
29O
2WC
53G
5VS
7RV
7X2
7X7
7XC
88E
8AO
8C1
8CJ
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
A8Z
AAFWJ
AAUCC
AAWOE
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABIVO
ABJCF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
AEAQA
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHMBA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
APEBS
ARAPS
ATCPS
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BVXVI
BWKFM
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
D1I
D1J
D1K
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAP
EAS
EBD
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F5P
FPL
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HH5
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IEA
IGS
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
IOV
IPY
ISE
ISR
ITC
K6-
KB.
KQ8
L6V
LK5
LK8
M0K
M1P
M48
M7P
M7R
M7S
M~E
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
P62
PATMY
PDBOC
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PTHSS
PV9
PYCSY
RNS
RPM
RZL
SV3
TR2
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
~02
~KM
ADRAZ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
IPNFZ
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
RIG
BBORY
PMFND
3V.
7QG
7QL
7QO
7SN
7SS
7T5
7TG
7TM
7U9
7XB
8FD
8FK
AZQEC
C1K
DWQXO
FR3
GNUQQ
H94
K9.
KL.
M7N
P64
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
RC3
7X8
ESTFP
PUEGO
5PM
AAPBV
ABPTK
N95
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-49895c25ed18e0cf41ec2e939ff2ad36dd0aa6ae7d355654e8788c667b6509783
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 1932-6203
IngestDate Sun Feb 05 03:13:54 EST 2023
Wed Aug 27 01:19:47 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:10:59 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 07:15:03 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 10:29:17 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:16:57 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:23:14 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 04:46:15 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 04:47:35 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 20:49:20 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:02:46 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:09:48 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:56 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
License This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Creative Commons Attribution License
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c692t-49895c25ed18e0cf41ec2e939ff2ad36dd0aa6ae7d355654e8788c667b6509783
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ORCID 0000-0003-3746-9913
0000-0002-1199-582X
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2219593308?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%&accountid=15518
PMID 31042714
PQID 2219593308
PQPubID 1436336
PageCount e0205633
ParticipantIDs plos_journals_2219593308
doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bcf8adb7859b46fdba13a07181260b14
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6493721
proquest_miscellaneous_2218999616
proquest_journals_2219593308
gale_infotracmisc_A584150170
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A584150170
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A584150170
gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A584150170
gale_healthsolutions_A584150170
pubmed_primary_31042714
crossref_citationtrail_10_1371_journal_pone_0205633
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0205633
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-05-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-05-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: San Francisco
– name: San Francisco, CA USA
PublicationTitle PloS one
PublicationTitleAlternate PLoS One
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher Public Library of Science
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publisher_xml – name: Public Library of Science
– name: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
References ref13
ref10
A Glassman (ref1) 2012; 7
CS Currie (ref26) 2005; 5
ref17
M Sculpher (ref24) 2004
D Husereau (ref7) 2013; 16
K Claxton (ref21) 2013
CJ Murray (ref6) 2000; 9
WT Bill (ref14) 2014
PA Harris (ref19) 2009; 42
T Wilkinson (ref16) 2016; 19
A Briggs (ref27) 2016; 25
MD Rawlins (ref11) 2004; 329
PJ Neumann (ref18) 2018; 2
AS Azman (ref25) 2014; 12
R Eldessouki (ref8) 2012; 1
MC Weinstein (ref3) 1996; 276
B Santatiwongchai (ref12) 2015; 10
ref20
UK Griffiths (ref15) 2016; 25
Y Teerawattananon (ref9) 2011; 91
LB Russell (ref4) 1996; 276
AM Gray (ref22) 2016; 32
MP Matsoso (ref23) 2012
K Chalkidou (ref2) 2016; 94
GD Sanders (ref5) 2016; 316
References_xml – volume: 42
  start-page: 377
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  ident: ref19
  article-title: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
  publication-title: Journal of biomedical informatics
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
– volume: 276
  start-page: 1172
  year: 1996
  ident: ref4
  article-title: The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine
  publication-title: JOURNAL-AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
  doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03540140060028
– volume: 9
  start-page: 235
  issue: 3
  year: 2000
  ident: ref6
  article-title: Development of WHO guidelines on generalized cost‐effectiveness analysis
  publication-title: Health economics
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(200004)9:3<235::AID-HEC502>3.0.CO;2-O
– volume: 7
  start-page: 13
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: ref1
  article-title: Priority-setting institutions in health: recommendations from a center for global development working group
  publication-title: Glob Heart
  doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2012.01.007
– volume: 276
  start-page: 1253
  issue: 15
  year: 1996
  ident: ref3
  article-title: Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03540150055031
– volume: 25
  start-page: 29
  issue: S1
  year: 2016
  ident: ref15
  article-title: Comparison of Economic Evaluation Methods Across Low‐income, Middle‐income and High‐income Countries: What are the Differences and Why?
  publication-title: Health economics
  doi: 10.1002/hec.3312
– volume: 32
  start-page: 102
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: ref22
  article-title: Economic evaluation of healthcare interventions: old and new directions
  publication-title: Oxford Review of Economic Policy
  doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grv020
– year: 2004
  ident: ref24
  article-title: Generalisability in economic evaluation studies in healthcare: a review and case studies
  publication-title: Generalisability in economic evaluation studies in healthcare: a review and case studies
– ident: ref20
– year: 2012
  ident: ref23
  article-title: Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Submissions
  publication-title: Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Submissions
– volume: 316
  start-page: 1093
  issue: 10
  year: 2016
  ident: ref5
  article-title: Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12195
– year: 2013
  ident: ref21
  article-title: The Gates reference case for economic evaluation
– volume: 25
  start-page: 6
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2016
  ident: ref27
  article-title: Editorial
  publication-title: Health Economics
  doi: 10.1002/hec.3321
– volume: 16
  start-page: 231
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  ident: ref7
  article-title: Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS)—explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force
  publication-title: Value in Health
  doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002
– volume: 91
  start-page: 11
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  ident: ref9
  article-title: Thai health technology assessment guideline development
  publication-title: Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand
– volume: 94
  start-page: 462
  issue: 6
  year: 2016
  ident: ref2
  article-title: Priority-setting for achieving universal health coverage
  publication-title: Bulletin of the World Health Organization
  doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.155721
– volume: 10
  start-page: e0123853
  issue: 5
  year: 2015
  ident: ref12
  article-title: Methodological variation in economic evaluations conducted in low-and middle-income countries: information for reference case development
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123853
– year: 2014
  ident: ref14
– volume: 19
  start-page: 921
  issue: 8
  year: 2016
  ident: ref16
  article-title: The international decision support initiative reference case for economic evaluation: an aid to thought
  publication-title: Value in health
  doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.015
– ident: ref17
– ident: ref13
– volume: 2
  year: 2018
  ident: ref18
  article-title: Comparing the cost-per-QALYs gained and cost-per-DALYs averted literatures
  publication-title: Gates Open Research
  doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.12786.1
– volume: 5
  start-page: 130
  issue: 1
  year: 2005
  ident: ref26
  article-title: Cost, affordability and cost-effectiveness of strategies to control tuberculosis in countries with high HIV prevalence
  publication-title: BMC Public Health
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-130
– volume: 329
  start-page: 224
  issue: 7459
  year: 2004
  ident: ref11
  article-title: National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. BMJ
  publication-title: British Medical Journal
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7459.224
– volume: 1
  start-page: 118
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: ref8
  article-title: Health care system information sharing: a step toward better health globally
  publication-title: Value in Health Regional Issues
  doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.022
– volume: 12
  start-page: 216
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: ref25
  article-title: How much is tuberculosis screening worth? Estimating the value of active case finding for tuberculosis in South Africa, China, and India
  publication-title: BMC medicine
  doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0216-0
– ident: ref10
SSID ssj0053866
Score 2.429017
Snippet The iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study assesses...
Background The iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This...
BackgroundThe iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study...
Background The iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This...
SourceID plos
doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage e0205633
SubjectTerms Adhesion
Analysis
Budgets
Cost analysis
Cost benefit analysis
Decision making
Engineering and Technology
Global Health
Health care
Health care costs
Health care facilities
Health economics
Informatics
Low income groups
Medical centers
Medical publishing
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
People and Places
Public health
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Research and Analysis Methods
Sensitivity analysis
Social Sciences
Specifications
Studies
Tuberculosis
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELbQnrggyqsLBQxCAg5u49hx7ONCqVrEQ2opKifLsR1aqUqiJvv_GcfeqEGVyoFrPI6SeWS-UcbfIPSmdqaCzGOIFEIS7hknpsg8odwb77kvVBUKxa_fxOEp_3xWnF0b9RV6wiI9cFTcXmVraVxVStjFRe0qQ5mBvAiJSWTVOMI6z1S2KabiNxiiWIh0UI6VdC_ZZbdrG78LAKkQjM0S0cjXP32VF91l298EOf_unLyWig7uo3sJQ-JVfPYtdMc3D9BWitIev0tU0u8fouOVO4_n-fDQYsB6-GL_5AhPs0WwhSSGx4FDuEsN8g7bth9I56_I_urLL2zCxGa42seOw0fo9ODTj4-HJE1RIFaofCBcSVXYvPCOSp_ZmlNvc6-YquvcOCacy4wRxpcOoIcouJdQFVshyiqQ65WSPUaLBvS2jbA0itpAN-OzCoCHUQG-WWYh-9V1oegSsY1KtU0U42HSxaUe_5uVUGpEDelgCJ0MsURk2tVFio1b5D8Ea02ygSB7vABuo5Pb6NvcZoleBlvreNp0CnO9AkAGGJmW2RK9HiUCSUYTunB-m3Xf66PvP_9B6OR4JvQ2CdUtqMOadPIB3imQb80kd2aSEOp2trwdPHOjlV7neeAGYiyTsHPjrTcvv5qWw01DZ13j2_UoI0PRS8USPYnOPWkWoD_Py6Cscub2M9XPV5qL85GjXHDAvTl9-j9s9QzdBZiqYpvpDloMV2v_HKDgUL0Yo_4Pc-hbYg
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Scholars Portal: Open Access Journals [open access]
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwELbKckFCqC2PhhYwCAk4ZBXHjuMcEFooVYt4SC2LyilyHKettErCJivBv2cm8UYELY9rPF4l4xnPN-vxN4Q8LXKdQeTRvpJS-cJy4esosD4TVlsrbJRkmCh--CiP5-LdeXS-RdY9W50Cm42pHfaTmi8X0-_ffrwCh3_ZdW2I2XrStK5KOwX4E0nOr5Hr3YkRFvOJ4VwBvFtKd4HuTzNHAarj8R9260m9qJpNUPT3ispfQtTRNrnlsCWd9cawQ7ZsuUtu9n_M0f6-0S7Zcd7c0OeOcvrFbXI6yy_7e3-0rShgQnp1eHZChx4k1ECwo11jIlq7Qvqcmqpp_dou_cPZ-69UY2dneNr0lYl3yPzo7ec3x77rtuAbmYStLxKVRCaMbM6UDUwhmDWhTXhSFKHOuczzQGupbZwDRJGRsAqyZyNlnCEJX6z4XTIpQY97hCqdMIO0NDbIAKDoBGGe4QaiZFFECfMIX6s4NY6KHDtiLNLufC2GlKTXWIoLk7qF8Yg_zKp7Ko5_yL_G1RtkkUi7e1AtL1Lnl2lmCqXzLFZglEIWeaYZ1wC7APfIIGPCI49w7dP-VuqwHaQzAG6ApVkceORJJ4FkGiVW61zoVdOkJ5--_IfQ2elI6JkTKipQh9HuhgR8E5J0jSQPRpKwJZjR8B5a6lorTRqGyCHEeaBg5tp6Nw8_HobxR7ECr7TVqpNRmBwz6ZF7vbEPmoUUQYQxKiseucFI9eOR8uqy4zKXAvBxyO7__bX2yQ0AqklfaHpAJu1yZR8AGGyzh51__wSCrF1C
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Adherence to the iDSI reference case among published cost-per-DALY averted studies
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31042714
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2219593308
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2218999616
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6493721
https://doaj.org/article/bcf8adb7859b46fdba13a07181260b14
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205633
Volume 14
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELe27gUJITY-VhjFICTgIVucOI7zgFD3UTbECuoYKk-RYzvbpKkJS_v_c5c4gaAJeMlDfKmas-_8O-fud4S8yo3KYOdRnhRCetyG3FORbz3GrbKW2yjJMFA8nYrjc_5xHs3XyLSthcG0ytYn1o7aFBrPyPeCAGlQIPqW78sfHnaNwq-rbQsN5VormHc1xdg62QCXHPkDsrF_NP0ya30zWLcQroAujNmem6_dsljYXQBOkQjD3gZV8_h33npQXhfVbVD0z4zK37aoyX1yz2FLOm4WwyZZs4stcrc5mKNNvdEW2XTWXNE3jnL67QMyG5vLpu6PLgsKmJBeHZ6d0K4HCdWw2dG6MREtXSK9obqoll5pb7zD8afvVGFnZ7hbNZmJD8n55OjrwbHnui14WiTB0uOJTCIdRNYwaX2dc2Z1YJMwyfNAmVAY4ysllI0NQBQRcSshetZCxBmS8MUyfEQGC9DjNqFSJUwjLY31MwAoKkGYp0MNu2SeRwkbkrBVcaodFTl2xLhO6-9rMYQkjcZSnJjUTcyQeN1TZUPF8Q_5fZy9ThaJtOsbxc1F6uwyzXQulcliCYuSi9xkioUKYBfgHuFnjA_Jc5z7tKlK7dxBOgbgBliaxf6QvKwlkExjgdk6F2pVVenJ52__IXQ26wm9dkJ5AerQylVIwDshSVdPcqcnCS5B94a3caW2WqnSX8YDT7ar9_bhF90w_ihm4C1ssaplJAbHTAzJ42axd5qFEIEHMSor7plBT_X9kcXVZc1lLjjg44A9-fvfekruAFBNmkTTHTJY3qzsMwCDy2xE1uN5DFd5wPA6-TByNj-qj1fgesrlT1IpYm8
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELbK9gASQrQ8ulCoQSDgkDYPx0kOFdqyrXbpdkF9oHIKju20laokbHaF-HP8NmYSJxBUAZde40mUjO2Zb5yZbwh5kSqRgOcRVsh5aDHtMUv4trYcpoXWTPtRgoHiwZSPTtj7U_90ifxoamEwrbKxiZWhVrnEM_It10UaFIi-w7fFVwu7RuHf1aaFhjCtFdR2RTFmCjv29fdvEMKV2-MhzPdL193bPX43skyXAUvyyJ1bLAojX7q-Vk6obZkyR0tXR16Upq5QHlfKFoILHShwzdxnOoSoUXIeJEg-F4QePPcGWWZ4gNIjyzu704-HjS8Aa8K5KdjzAmfLrI_NIs_0JgA1n3texyFWfQNa79ArLvPyKuj7Zwbnby5x7y65Y7AsHdSLb4Us6WyV3K4PAmld37RKVoz1KOlrQ3H95h45HKjzus6QznMKGJReDI_GtO15QiU4V1o1QqKFSdxXVObl3Cr0zBoOJp-pwE7ScLWsMyHvk5Nr0fsD0stAj2uEhiJyJNLgaDsBQCQihJXSk-CV09SPnD7xGhXH0lCfYweOy7j6nxdACFRrLMaJic3E9InV3lXU1B__kN_B2Wtlkbi7upDPzmJjB-JEpqFQSRDCJmA8VYlwPAEwD3AWtxOH9ckGzn1cV8G25iceAFAE7O4Edp88rySQvCPD7KAzsSjLePzh038IHR12hF4ZoTQHdUhhKjLgm5AUrCO53pEEEyQ7w2u4UhutlPGvzQp3Nqv36uFn7TA-FDP-Mp0vKpkQg3GH98nDerG3moWQhLkBKivobIOO6rsj2cV5xZ3OGeBx13n099faIDdHxweTeDKe7j8mtwAkR3WS6zrpzWcL_QSA6Dx5anY7JV-u28D8BHeAmrE
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEF6VVEJICNHyaKDQBYGAgxs_1mv7UKGUNGpoCVUfqJzMenfdVqpsEydC_EV-FTP22mBUAZdevWMrmdmd-cae-YaQF6kSCUQeYYWchxbTHrOEb2vLYVpozbQfJZgofpjy3RP2_tQ_XSI_ml4YLKtsfGLlqFUu8R35wHWRBgWy73CQmrKIg9H4bfHVwglS-KW1GachzJgFtVXRjZkmjz39_Rukc-XWZAS2f-m6453jd7uWmThgSR65c4tFYeRL19fKCbUtU-Zo6erIi9LUFcrjStlCcKEDBWGa-0yHkEFKzoMEieiC0IPn3iDLAUR9SASXt3emB4dNXADPwrlp3vMCZ2D2ymaRZ3oTQJvPPa8THKsZAm2k6BWXeXkVDP6zmvO38Di-S-4YXEuH9UZcIUs6WyW365eCtO51WiUrxpOU9LWhu35zjxwO1Xndc0jnOQU8Si9GRxPazj-hEgItrYYi0cIU8Ssq83JuFXpmjYb7n6nAqdJwtayrIu-Tk2vR-wPSy0CPa4SGInIkUuJoOwFwJCKEmNKTEKHT1I-cPvEaFcfS0KDjNI7LuPq2F0A6VGssRsPExjB9YrV3FTUNyD_kt9F6rSySeFcX8tlZbHxCnMg0FCoJQjgQjKcqEY4nAPIB5uJ24rA-2UDbx3VHbOuK4iGARsDxTmD3yfNKAok8MjwSZ2JRlvHk46f_EDo67Ai9MkJpDuqQwnRnwH9CgrCO5HpHEtyR7Cyv4U5ttFLGvw4u3Nns3quXn7XL-FCs_st0vqhkQkzMHd4nD-vN3moW0hPmBqisoHMMOqrvrmQX5xWPOmeAzV3n0d9_1ga5CY4m3p9M9x6TW4CXo7redZ305rOFfgKYdJ48NYedki_X7V9-Ahq_nvU
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adherence+to+the+iDSI+reference+case+among+published+cost-per-DALY+averted+studies&rft.jtitle=PloS+one&rft.au=Emerson%2C+Joanna&rft.au=Panzer%2C+Ari&rft.au=Cohen%2C+Joshua+T&rft.au=Chalkidou%2C+Kalipso&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.pub=Public+Library+of+Science&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0205633&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0205633&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon