Effects of vibrotactile feedback and grasp interface compliance on perception and control of a sensorized myoelectric hand

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 14; no. 1; p. e0210956
• Main Authors: Pena, Andres E., Rincon-Gonzalez, Liliana, Abbas, James J., Jung, Ranu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 16.01.2019; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Active control; Actuators; Adult; Amputation; Amputees; Analysis; Apertures; Arrays; Artificial arms; Artificial Limbs; Biology and Life Sciences; Biomechanical Phenomena; Biomedical engineering; Compliance - physiology; Computer Simulation; Configurations; Electric stimulation; Electromyography; Engineering; Engineering and Technology; Feedback; Feedback, Sensory - physiology; Female; Hand; Hand - physiology; Hand Strength - physiology; Humans; International conferences; Male; Medicine and Health Sciences; Myoelectric control; Myoelectric prostheses; Myoelectricity; Perception; Perception - physiology; Process controls; Prostheses; Prosthesis Design; Research and Analysis Methods; Robotics; Robots; Sensory feedback; Sensory perception; Skin; Social Sciences; Stability; Touch - physiology; Vibration; Visual stimuli; Young Adult; Florida; United States > US
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210956

Current myoelectric prosthetic limbs are limited in their ability to provide direct sensory feedback to users, which increases attentional demands and reliance on visual cues. Vibrotactile sensory substitution (VSS), which can be used to provide sensory feedback in a non-invasive manner has demonstrated some improvement in myoelectric hand control. In this work, we developed and tested two VSS configurations: one with a single burst-rate modulated actuator and another with a spatially distributed array of five coin tactors. We performed a direct comparative assessment of these two VSS configurations with able-bodied subjects to investigate sensory perception, myoelectric control of grasp force and hand aperture with a prosthesis, and the effects of interface compliance. Six subjects completed a sensory perception experiment under a stimulation only paradigm; sixteen subjects completed experiments to compare VSS performance on perception and graded myoelectric control during grasp force and hand aperture tasks; and ten subjects completed experiments to investigate the effect of mechanical compliance of the myoelectric hand on the ability to control grasp force. Results indicated that sensory perception of vibrotactile feedback was not different for the two VSS configurations in the absence of active myoelectric control, but it was better with feedback from the coin tactor array than with the single actuator during myoelectric control of grasp force. Graded myoelectric control of grasp force and hand aperture was better with feedback from the coin tactor array than with the single actuator, and myoelectric control of grasp force was improved with a compliant grasp interface. Further investigations with VSS should focus on the use of coin tactor arrays by subjects with amputation in real-world settings and on improving control of grasp force by increasing the mechanical compliance of the hand.