Data quality control in genetic case-control association studies

This protocol details the steps for data quality assessment and control that are typically carried out during case-control association studies. The steps described involve the identification and removal of DNA samples and markers that introduce bias. These critical steps are paramount to the success...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature protocols Vol. 5; no. 9; pp. 1564 - 1573
Main Authors Anderson, Carl A, Pettersson, Fredrik H, Clarke, Geraldine M, Cardon, Lon R, Morris, Andrew P, Zondervan, Krina T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.09.2010
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1754-2189
1750-2799
1750-2799
DOI10.1038/nprot.2010.116

Cover

More Information
Summary:This protocol details the steps for data quality assessment and control that are typically carried out during case-control association studies. The steps described involve the identification and removal of DNA samples and markers that introduce bias. These critical steps are paramount to the success of a case-control study and are necessary before statistically testing for association. We describe how to use PLINK, a tool for handling SNP data, to perform assessments of failure rate per individual and per SNP and to assess the degree of relatedness between individuals. We also detail other quality-control procedures, including the use of SMARTPCA software for the identification of ancestral outliers. These platforms were selected because they are user-friendly, widely used and computationally efficient. Steps needed to detect and establish a disease association using case-control data are not discussed here. Issues concerning study design and marker selection in case-control studies have been discussed in our earlier protocols. This protocol, which is routinely used in our labs, should take approximately 8 h to complete.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
CAA wrote the first draft of the manuscript. CAA wrote scripts and performed analyses. CAA, FHP, GMC, APM, and KTZ revised the manuscript. CAA, LRC, APM and KTZ designed the protocol.
Author Contributions
ISSN:1754-2189
1750-2799
1750-2799
DOI:10.1038/nprot.2010.116