Data quality control in genetic case-control association studies
This protocol details the steps for data quality assessment and control that are typically carried out during case-control association studies. The steps described involve the identification and removal of DNA samples and markers that introduce bias. These critical steps are paramount to the success...
Saved in:
| Published in | Nature protocols Vol. 5; no. 9; pp. 1564 - 1573 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
01.09.2010
Nature Publishing Group |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1754-2189 1750-2799 1750-2799 |
| DOI | 10.1038/nprot.2010.116 |
Cover
| Summary: | This protocol details the steps for data quality assessment and control that are typically carried out during case-control association studies. The steps described involve the identification and removal of DNA samples and markers that introduce bias. These critical steps are paramount to the success of a case-control study and are necessary before statistically testing for association. We describe how to use PLINK, a tool for handling SNP data, to perform assessments of failure rate per individual and per SNP and to assess the degree of relatedness between individuals. We also detail other quality-control procedures, including the use of SMARTPCA software for the identification of ancestral outliers. These platforms were selected because they are user-friendly, widely used and computationally efficient. Steps needed to detect and establish a disease association using case-control data are not discussed here. Issues concerning study design and marker selection in case-control studies have been discussed in our earlier protocols. This protocol, which is routinely used in our labs, should take approximately 8 h to complete. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 CAA wrote the first draft of the manuscript. CAA wrote scripts and performed analyses. CAA, FHP, GMC, APM, and KTZ revised the manuscript. CAA, LRC, APM and KTZ designed the protocol. Author Contributions |
| ISSN: | 1754-2189 1750-2799 1750-2799 |
| DOI: | 10.1038/nprot.2010.116 |