High reproducibility of a novel supported anterior drawer test for diagnosing ankle instability

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 148 - 8
• Main Authors: Murahashi, Yasutaka, Teramoto, Atsushi, Takahashi, Katsunori, Okada, Yohei, Okimura, Shinichiro, Imamura, Rui, Kawai, Makoto, Watanabe, Kota, Yamashita, Toshihiko
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 27.02.2023; BioMed Central Ltd; BMC
• Subjects: Accuracy; Ankle; Ankle instability; Ankle sprains; Anterior drawer test; Anterior talofibular ligament; Biosensors; Capacitance; Capacitance-type sensor device; Diagnostic imaging; Electric Capacitance; Epidemiology; Hand; Hands; Humans; Hypermobility; Injuries; Instability; Internal Medicine; Joint and ligament injuries; Joint Instability - diagnosis; Joints; Knee; Medical diagnosis; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Methods; Musculoskeletal diseases; Orthopedics; Radiography; Rehabilitation; Reproducibility; Reproducibility of Results; Rheumatology; Sensors; Sports Medicine; Statistical significance; Testing; Translation; Japan; Ankle sprains; Anterior drawer test; Capacitance-type sensor device; Ankle instability; Anterior talofibular ligament
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06246-8

Background The manual traditional anterior drawer test (ADT) is essential for deciding the treatment for chronic ankle instability, but it has been shown to have a comparatively low reproducibility and accuracy, especially in less experienced hands. To clarify the inter-examiner reproducibility, we compared the actual distance of anterior translation between junior and senior examiners in ADT. We also evaluated the diagnostic abilities of traditional ADT, and a novel modified ADT (supported ADT). Methods Thirty ankles were included in this study, and ankle instability was defined using stress radiography. All subjects underwent two methods of manual ADT by junior and senior examiners, and ankle instability was judged in a blinded fashion. The anterior drawer distance was calculated from the lengthening measured using a capacitance-type sensor device. Results The degree of anterior translation determined by the junior examiner was significantly lower than that determined by the senior examiner when traditional ADT was performed (3.3 vs. 4.5 mm, P  = 0.016), but there was no significant difference in anterior translation between the two examiners when supported ADT was performed (4.6 vs. 4.1 mm, P  = 0.168). The inter-examiner reliability of supported ADT was higher than that of traditional ADT. For the junior examiner, the diagnostic accuracy of supported ADT was higher than that of traditional ADT (sensitivity, 0.40 vs. 0.80; specificity, 0.75 vs. 0.80). Conclusion Supported ADT may have the advantage of being a simple manual test of ankle instability with less error between examiners.