心复宁颗粒联合西药治疗冠心病的疗效观察

目的：探讨心复宁颗粒联合西药治疗冠心病的临床疗效。方法：选取2015年9月—2016年9月广州中医药大学祈福医院收治的冠心病患者100例作为研究对象,以随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组50例。对照组患者给予常规西药治疗,观察组患者在对照组的基础上加用心复宁颗粒。观察两组患者心电图及心绞痛情况,比较两组患者心功能指标的差异。结果：观察组患者运动试验心电图阴性率明显高于对照组,心绞痛发作次数明显少于对照组,心绞痛持续时间明显短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;治疗后,观察组患者左心室收缩末期容积明显低于对照组,左心室射血分数、左心室内径缩短率、每搏输出量明显高于对照组,差异均有统计...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in中国医院用药评价与分析 Vol. 17; no. 7; pp. 924 - 925
Main Author 徐泽民 纪玉霞 陈丽敏 孙勇
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 广州中医药大学祈福医院药学部,广东 广州,511495%广州中医药大学祈福医院超声科,广东 广州,511495%广州中医药大学祈福医院心血管内科,广东 广州,511495 2017
Subjects
冠心病
心复宁颗粒
心绞痛
心复宁颗粒
冠心病
Angina pectoris
Coronary heart disease
Xinfuning granules
心绞痛
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1672-2124
DOI10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2017.07.022

Cover

More Information
Summary:目的：探讨心复宁颗粒联合西药治疗冠心病的临床疗效。方法：选取2015年9月—2016年9月广州中医药大学祈福医院收治的冠心病患者100例作为研究对象,以随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组50例。对照组患者给予常规西药治疗,观察组患者在对照组的基础上加用心复宁颗粒。观察两组患者心电图及心绞痛情况,比较两组患者心功能指标的差异。结果：观察组患者运动试验心电图阴性率明显高于对照组,心绞痛发作次数明显少于对照组,心绞痛持续时间明显短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;治疗后,观察组患者左心室收缩末期容积明显低于对照组,左心室射血分数、左心室内径缩短率、每搏输出量明显高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：心复宁颗粒联合西药治疗冠心病的效果显著,可有效缓解患者症状。
Bibliography:OBJECTIVE： To probe into the clinical efficacy of Xinfuning granules combined with western medicine in treatment of coronary heart disease. METHODS： 100 patients with coronary heart disease admitted into Clifford Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from Sept. 2015 to Sept. 2016 were selected to be divided into observation group and control group via the random number table,with 50 cases in each. The control group was given conventional western medicine treatment,while the observation group additionally received Xinfuning granules based on the control group. The electrocardiogram and angina of two groups were observed,differences of cardiac parameters of two groups were compared. RESULTS： The cardiogram negative rate of the motion test of observation group was significantly higher than that of control group; the number of angina attack was significantly less than that of control group; yet the angina pectoris duration was significantly shorter than that of control group,with statis
ISSN:1672-2124
DOI:10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2017.07.022