Assessment of the organizational factors in incident management practices in healthcare: A tree augmented Naive Bayes model

Despite the exponential transformation occurring in the healthcare industry, operational failures pose significant challenges in the delivery of safe and efficient care. Incident management plays a crucial role in mitigating these challenges; however, it encounters limitations due to organizational...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 19; no. 3; p. e0299485
Main Authors Albreiki, Salma, Simsekler, Mecit Can Emre, Qazi, Abroon, Bouabid, Ali
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 07.03.2024
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0299485

Cover

More Information
Summary:Despite the exponential transformation occurring in the healthcare industry, operational failures pose significant challenges in the delivery of safe and efficient care. Incident management plays a crucial role in mitigating these challenges; however, it encounters limitations due to organizational factors within complex and dynamic healthcare systems. Further, there are limited studies examining the interdependencies and relative importance of these factors in the context of incident management practices. To address this gap, this study utilized aggregate-level hospital data to explore the influence of organizational factors on incident management practices. Employing a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) structural learning algorithm, Tree Augmented Naive (TAN), this study assessed the probabilistic relationships, represented graphically, between organizational factors and incident management. Significantly, the model highlighted the critical roles of morale and staff engagement in influencing incident management practices within organizations. This study enhances our understanding of the importance of organizational factors in incident management, providing valuable insights for healthcare managers to effectively prioritize and allocate resources for continuous quality improvement efforts.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interests: “The authors have declared that no competing interests exist”.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0299485