A mixed-methods systematic review of suicide prevention interventions involving multisectoral collaborations
Background Governments and third-sector organizations (TSOs) require support to reduce suicide mortality through funding of suicide prevention services and innovative research. One way is for researchers to engage individuals and services in multisectoral collaborations, to collaboratively design, d...
Saved in:
| Published in | Health research policy and systems Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 40 - 19 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
London
BioMed Central
14.04.2022
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1478-4505 1478-4505 |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-022-00835-0 |
Cover
| Abstract | Background
Governments and third-sector organizations (TSOs) require support to reduce suicide mortality through funding of suicide prevention services and innovative research. One way is for researchers to engage individuals and services in multisectoral collaborations, to collaboratively design, develop and test suicide prevention services and programmes. However, despite widespread support, to date, it remains unclear as to the extent to which stakeholders are being included in the research process, or if they are, how these partnerships occur in practice. To address this gap, the authors conducted a systematic review with the aim of identifying evidence of multisectoral collaborations within the field of suicide prevention, the types of stakeholders involved and their level of involvement.
Methods
The authors conducted a strategic PRISMA-compliant search of five electronic databases to retrieve literature published between January 2008 and July 2021. Hand-searching of reference lists of key systematic reviews was also completed. Of the 7937 papers retrieved, 16 papers finally met the inclusion criteria. Because of data heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed; however, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed.
Results
Only one paper included engagement of stakeholders across the research cycle (co-ideation, co-design, co-implementation and co-evaluation). Most stakeholders were represented by citizens or communities, with only a small number of TSOs involved in multisectoral collaborations. Stakeholder level of involvement focused on the co-design or co-evaluation stage.
Conclusion
This review revealed a lack of evidence of multisectoral collaborations being established between researchers and stakeholders in the field of suicide prevention research, even while such practice is being espoused in government policies and funding guidelines. Of the evidence that is available, there is a lack of quality studies documenting the collaborative research process. Also, results showed that the inclusion of co-researchers from communities or organizations is defined as co-creation, but further analysis revealed that collaboration was not consistent across the duration of projects. Researchers and practitioners should consider issues of power and equity in multisectoral collaborations and encourage increased engagement with TSOs, to rigorously research and evaluate suicide prevention services. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Governments and third-sector organizations (TSOs) require support to reduce suicide mortality through funding of suicide prevention services and innovative research. One way is for researchers to engage individuals and services in multisectoral collaborations, to collaboratively design, develop and test suicide prevention services and programmes. However, despite widespread support, to date, it remains unclear as to the extent to which stakeholders are being included in the research process, or if they are, how these partnerships occur in practice. To address this gap, the authors conducted a systematic review with the aim of identifying evidence of multisectoral collaborations within the field of suicide prevention, the types of stakeholders involved and their level of involvement.
The authors conducted a strategic PRISMA-compliant search of five electronic databases to retrieve literature published between January 2008 and July 2021. Hand-searching of reference lists of key systematic reviews was also completed. Of the 7937 papers retrieved, 16 papers finally met the inclusion criteria. Because of data heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed; however, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed.
Only one paper included engagement of stakeholders across the research cycle (co-ideation, co-design, co-implementation and co-evaluation). Most stakeholders were represented by citizens or communities, with only a small number of TSOs involved in multisectoral collaborations. Stakeholder level of involvement focused on the co-design or co-evaluation stage.
This review revealed a lack of evidence of multisectoral collaborations being established between researchers and stakeholders in the field of suicide prevention research, even while such practice is being espoused in government policies and funding guidelines. Of the evidence that is available, there is a lack of quality studies documenting the collaborative research process. Also, results showed that the inclusion of co-researchers from communities or organizations is defined as co-creation, but further analysis revealed that collaboration was not consistent across the duration of projects. Researchers and practitioners should consider issues of power and equity in multisectoral collaborations and encourage increased engagement with TSOs, to rigorously research and evaluate suicide prevention services. Abstract Background Governments and third-sector organizations (TSOs) require support to reduce suicide mortality through funding of suicide prevention services and innovative research. One way is for researchers to engage individuals and services in multisectoral collaborations, to collaboratively design, develop and test suicide prevention services and programmes. However, despite widespread support, to date, it remains unclear as to the extent to which stakeholders are being included in the research process, or if they are, how these partnerships occur in practice. To address this gap, the authors conducted a systematic review with the aim of identifying evidence of multisectoral collaborations within the field of suicide prevention, the types of stakeholders involved and their level of involvement. Methods The authors conducted a strategic PRISMA-compliant search of five electronic databases to retrieve literature published between January 2008 and July 2021. Hand-searching of reference lists of key systematic reviews was also completed. Of the 7937 papers retrieved, 16 papers finally met the inclusion criteria. Because of data heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed; however, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. Results Only one paper included engagement of stakeholders across the research cycle (co-ideation, co-design, co-implementation and co-evaluation). Most stakeholders were represented by citizens or communities, with only a small number of TSOs involved in multisectoral collaborations. Stakeholder level of involvement focused on the co-design or co-evaluation stage. Conclusion This review revealed a lack of evidence of multisectoral collaborations being established between researchers and stakeholders in the field of suicide prevention research, even while such practice is being espoused in government policies and funding guidelines. Of the evidence that is available, there is a lack of quality studies documenting the collaborative research process. Also, results showed that the inclusion of co-researchers from communities or organizations is defined as co-creation, but further analysis revealed that collaboration was not consistent across the duration of projects. Researchers and practitioners should consider issues of power and equity in multisectoral collaborations and encourage increased engagement with TSOs, to rigorously research and evaluate suicide prevention services. Governments and third-sector organizations (TSOs) require support to reduce suicide mortality through funding of suicide prevention services and innovative research. One way is for researchers to engage individuals and services in multisectoral collaborations, to collaboratively design, develop and test suicide prevention services and programmes. However, despite widespread support, to date, it remains unclear as to the extent to which stakeholders are being included in the research process, or if they are, how these partnerships occur in practice. To address this gap, the authors conducted a systematic review with the aim of identifying evidence of multisectoral collaborations within the field of suicide prevention, the types of stakeholders involved and their level of involvement. The authors conducted a strategic PRISMA-compliant search of five electronic databases to retrieve literature published between January 2008 and July 2021. Hand-searching of reference lists of key systematic reviews was also completed. Of the 7937 papers retrieved, 16 papers finally met the inclusion criteria. Because of data heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed; however, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. Only one paper included engagement of stakeholders across the research cycle (co-ideation, co-design, co-implementation and co-evaluation). Most stakeholders were represented by citizens or communities, with only a small number of TSOs involved in multisectoral collaborations. Stakeholder level of involvement focused on the co-design or co-evaluation stage. This review revealed a lack of evidence of multisectoral collaborations being established between researchers and stakeholders in the field of suicide prevention research, even while such practice is being espoused in government policies and funding guidelines. Of the evidence that is available, there is a lack of quality studies documenting the collaborative research process. Also, results showed that the inclusion of co-researchers from communities or organizations is defined as co-creation, but further analysis revealed that collaboration was not consistent across the duration of projects. Researchers and practitioners should consider issues of power and equity in multisectoral collaborations and encourage increased engagement with TSOs, to rigorously research and evaluate suicide prevention services. Background Governments and third-sector organizations (TSOs) require support to reduce suicide mortality through funding of suicide prevention services and innovative research. One way is for researchers to engage individuals and services in multisectoral collaborations, to collaboratively design, develop and test suicide prevention services and programmes. However, despite widespread support, to date, it remains unclear as to the extent to which stakeholders are being included in the research process, or if they are, how these partnerships occur in practice. To address this gap, the authors conducted a systematic review with the aim of identifying evidence of multisectoral collaborations within the field of suicide prevention, the types of stakeholders involved and their level of involvement. Methods The authors conducted a strategic PRISMA-compliant search of five electronic databases to retrieve literature published between January 2008 and July 2021. Hand-searching of reference lists of key systematic reviews was also completed. Of the 7937 papers retrieved, 16 papers finally met the inclusion criteria. Because of data heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed; however, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. Results Only one paper included engagement of stakeholders across the research cycle (co-ideation, co-design, co-implementation and co-evaluation). Most stakeholders were represented by citizens or communities, with only a small number of TSOs involved in multisectoral collaborations. Stakeholder level of involvement focused on the co-design or co-evaluation stage. Conclusion This review revealed a lack of evidence of multisectoral collaborations being established between researchers and stakeholders in the field of suicide prevention research, even while such practice is being espoused in government policies and funding guidelines. Of the evidence that is available, there is a lack of quality studies documenting the collaborative research process. Also, results showed that the inclusion of co-researchers from communities or organizations is defined as co-creation, but further analysis revealed that collaboration was not consistent across the duration of projects. Researchers and practitioners should consider issues of power and equity in multisectoral collaborations and encourage increased engagement with TSOs, to rigorously research and evaluate suicide prevention services. Keywords: Suicide prevention, Multisectoral collaborations, Stakeholder, Consumers, Co-creation, Co-ideation, Co-design, Co-implementation, Co-evaluation Governments and third-sector organizations (TSOs) require support to reduce suicide mortality through funding of suicide prevention services and innovative research. One way is for researchers to engage individuals and services in multisectoral collaborations, to collaboratively design, develop and test suicide prevention services and programmes. However, despite widespread support, to date, it remains unclear as to the extent to which stakeholders are being included in the research process, or if they are, how these partnerships occur in practice. To address this gap, the authors conducted a systematic review with the aim of identifying evidence of multisectoral collaborations within the field of suicide prevention, the types of stakeholders involved and their level of involvement.BACKGROUNDGovernments and third-sector organizations (TSOs) require support to reduce suicide mortality through funding of suicide prevention services and innovative research. One way is for researchers to engage individuals and services in multisectoral collaborations, to collaboratively design, develop and test suicide prevention services and programmes. However, despite widespread support, to date, it remains unclear as to the extent to which stakeholders are being included in the research process, or if they are, how these partnerships occur in practice. To address this gap, the authors conducted a systematic review with the aim of identifying evidence of multisectoral collaborations within the field of suicide prevention, the types of stakeholders involved and their level of involvement.The authors conducted a strategic PRISMA-compliant search of five electronic databases to retrieve literature published between January 2008 and July 2021. Hand-searching of reference lists of key systematic reviews was also completed. Of the 7937 papers retrieved, 16 papers finally met the inclusion criteria. Because of data heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed; however, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed.METHODSThe authors conducted a strategic PRISMA-compliant search of five electronic databases to retrieve literature published between January 2008 and July 2021. Hand-searching of reference lists of key systematic reviews was also completed. Of the 7937 papers retrieved, 16 papers finally met the inclusion criteria. Because of data heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed; however, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed.Only one paper included engagement of stakeholders across the research cycle (co-ideation, co-design, co-implementation and co-evaluation). Most stakeholders were represented by citizens or communities, with only a small number of TSOs involved in multisectoral collaborations. Stakeholder level of involvement focused on the co-design or co-evaluation stage.RESULTSOnly one paper included engagement of stakeholders across the research cycle (co-ideation, co-design, co-implementation and co-evaluation). Most stakeholders were represented by citizens or communities, with only a small number of TSOs involved in multisectoral collaborations. Stakeholder level of involvement focused on the co-design or co-evaluation stage.This review revealed a lack of evidence of multisectoral collaborations being established between researchers and stakeholders in the field of suicide prevention research, even while such practice is being espoused in government policies and funding guidelines. Of the evidence that is available, there is a lack of quality studies documenting the collaborative research process. Also, results showed that the inclusion of co-researchers from communities or organizations is defined as co-creation, but further analysis revealed that collaboration was not consistent across the duration of projects. Researchers and practitioners should consider issues of power and equity in multisectoral collaborations and encourage increased engagement with TSOs, to rigorously research and evaluate suicide prevention services.CONCLUSIONThis review revealed a lack of evidence of multisectoral collaborations being established between researchers and stakeholders in the field of suicide prevention research, even while such practice is being espoused in government policies and funding guidelines. Of the evidence that is available, there is a lack of quality studies documenting the collaborative research process. Also, results showed that the inclusion of co-researchers from communities or organizations is defined as co-creation, but further analysis revealed that collaboration was not consistent across the duration of projects. Researchers and practitioners should consider issues of power and equity in multisectoral collaborations and encourage increased engagement with TSOs, to rigorously research and evaluate suicide prevention services. Background Governments and third-sector organizations (TSOs) require support to reduce suicide mortality through funding of suicide prevention services and innovative research. One way is for researchers to engage individuals and services in multisectoral collaborations, to collaboratively design, develop and test suicide prevention services and programmes. However, despite widespread support, to date, it remains unclear as to the extent to which stakeholders are being included in the research process, or if they are, how these partnerships occur in practice. To address this gap, the authors conducted a systematic review with the aim of identifying evidence of multisectoral collaborations within the field of suicide prevention, the types of stakeholders involved and their level of involvement. Methods The authors conducted a strategic PRISMA-compliant search of five electronic databases to retrieve literature published between January 2008 and July 2021. Hand-searching of reference lists of key systematic reviews was also completed. Of the 7937 papers retrieved, 16 papers finally met the inclusion criteria. Because of data heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed; however, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. Results Only one paper included engagement of stakeholders across the research cycle (co-ideation, co-design, co-implementation and co-evaluation). Most stakeholders were represented by citizens or communities, with only a small number of TSOs involved in multisectoral collaborations. Stakeholder level of involvement focused on the co-design or co-evaluation stage. Conclusion This review revealed a lack of evidence of multisectoral collaborations being established between researchers and stakeholders in the field of suicide prevention research, even while such practice is being espoused in government policies and funding guidelines. Of the evidence that is available, there is a lack of quality studies documenting the collaborative research process. Also, results showed that the inclusion of co-researchers from communities or organizations is defined as co-creation, but further analysis revealed that collaboration was not consistent across the duration of projects. Researchers and practitioners should consider issues of power and equity in multisectoral collaborations and encourage increased engagement with TSOs, to rigorously research and evaluate suicide prevention services. Background Governments and third-sector organizations (TSOs) require support to reduce suicide mortality through funding of suicide prevention services and innovative research. One way is for researchers to engage individuals and services in multisectoral collaborations, to collaboratively design, develop and test suicide prevention services and programmes. However, despite widespread support, to date, it remains unclear as to the extent to which stakeholders are being included in the research process, or if they are, how these partnerships occur in practice. To address this gap, the authors conducted a systematic review with the aim of identifying evidence of multisectoral collaborations within the field of suicide prevention, the types of stakeholders involved and their level of involvement. Methods The authors conducted a strategic PRISMA-compliant search of five electronic databases to retrieve literature published between January 2008 and July 2021. Hand-searching of reference lists of key systematic reviews was also completed. Of the 7937 papers retrieved, 16 papers finally met the inclusion criteria. Because of data heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed; however, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. Results Only one paper included engagement of stakeholders across the research cycle (co-ideation, co-design, co-implementation and co-evaluation). Most stakeholders were represented by citizens or communities, with only a small number of TSOs involved in multisectoral collaborations. Stakeholder level of involvement focused on the co-design or co-evaluation stage. Conclusion This review revealed a lack of evidence of multisectoral collaborations being established between researchers and stakeholders in the field of suicide prevention research, even while such practice is being espoused in government policies and funding guidelines. Of the evidence that is available, there is a lack of quality studies documenting the collaborative research process. Also, results showed that the inclusion of co-researchers from communities or organizations is defined as co-creation, but further analysis revealed that collaboration was not consistent across the duration of projects. Researchers and practitioners should consider issues of power and equity in multisectoral collaborations and encourage increased engagement with TSOs, to rigorously research and evaluate suicide prevention services. |
| ArticleNumber | 40 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Pearce, Tania Shakeshaft, Anthony McKay, Kathy Maple, Myfanwy Brooks, Anna Wayland, Sarah Woodward, Alan |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Tania orcidid: 0000-0001-8772-5888 surname: Pearce fullname: Pearce, Tania email: tpearce7@myune.edu.au organization: School of Health, University of New England – sequence: 2 givenname: Myfanwy surname: Maple fullname: Maple, Myfanwy organization: School of Health, University of New England – sequence: 3 givenname: Sarah surname: Wayland fullname: Wayland, Sarah organization: School of Health, University of New England – sequence: 4 givenname: Kathy surname: McKay fullname: McKay, Kathy organization: Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust – sequence: 5 givenname: Alan surname: Woodward fullname: Woodward, Alan organization: Centre for Mental Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne – sequence: 6 givenname: Anna surname: Brooks fullname: Brooks, Anna organization: Lifeline Research Foundation – sequence: 7 givenname: Anthony surname: Shakeshaft fullname: Shakeshaft, Anthony organization: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422050$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kltr3DAQhU1JaS7tH-hDMfSlfXCqiyXbL4Ul9LIQKPTyLLTSaKPFtlJJ3ib_vrOXNNlQgh88Gn_nWDOc0-JoDCMUxWtKzilt5YdEWSdpRRirCGm5qMiz4oTWTVvVgoijB_VxcZrSiiDZcfaiOOaiZowIclL0s3LwN2CrAfJVsKlMtynDoLM3ZYS1hz9lcGWavPEWymtswZh9GEs_Zoj7Q8LTOvRrPy7LYeqzT2ByiLovTeh7vcByi70snjvdJ3i1f58Vvz5_-nnxtbr89mV-MbusjKxprrhgxJDOca6ZIQK0k9LWouuElI5Sbqy1dOE6S6zmrAVDbS0b12AhW4PAWTHf-dqgV-o6-kHHWxW0V9tGiEulI07Yg9ICrRakdehUW97phtegtTO1bhbQAHp93HldT4sBrMGJcbAD08Mvo79Sy7BWHSEd4RIN3u0NYvg9Qcpq8MkA7mWEMCXFpMBrN5JyRN8-QldhiiOuakOxmvBONvfUUuMAfnQB_2s2pmrWECJq3pHNDs7_Q-FjYfAGg-Q89g8E7w8EyGS4yUs9paTmP74fsm8eLuXfNu5yhUC7A0wMKUVwyvi8DQHewveKErWJsNpFWGEw1TbCaiNlj6R37k-K-E6UEB6XEO8394TqL5WuBFU |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s11121_022_01449_2 crossref_primary_10_1080_13811118_2024_2314518 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_14164 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_13661 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_13989 crossref_primary_10_12923_2353_8627_2023_0015 crossref_primary_10_3389_frhs_2023_1068297 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_13986 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_childyouth_2025_108191 crossref_primary_10_1080_13811118_2022_2131490 crossref_primary_10_61186_shefa_12_4_111 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40900_022_00394_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mhp_2025_200391 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_022_14313_3 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2024_1378481 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F 10.1007/s11414-013-9368-5 10.35844/001c.13244 10.3390/ijerph17072229 10.1186/s40352-018-0066-5 10.2478/gp-2019-0001 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.001 10.1155/2013/427417 10.1177/1043659616679234 10.1186/s12888-017-1380-5 10.3390/medicina57020109 10.2217/cer.14.79 10.1155/2018/9427452 10.18357/ijcyfs.gryglewiczk.512014 10.1186/s12913-016-1323-8 10.1080/14719037.2019.1619810 10.1177/1558689811423914 10.1136/bmj.k4771 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026514 10.1080/14719037.2015.1111660 10.1111/1753-6405.12573 10.12927/hcpol.2019.25792 10.1017/gmh.2016.27 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002 10.1521/suli.2010.40.1.74 10.1176/appi.ps.202000203 10.1002/ajcp.12469 10.1177/008124630903900101 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00152-8 10.1186/s12889-020-09081-x 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00976.x 10.3310/phr01040 10.13140/RG.2.2.25894.11844 10.1186/s13012-015-0265-6 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 10.5751/ES-08053-210224 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.008 10.2196/17481 10.1186/s13643-018-0681-1 10.2196/humanfactors.4361 10.3402/ijch.v68i3.18328 10.1007/s10826-013-9809-z 10.1002/pits.21610 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113015 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.019 10.1111/ajr.12345 10.1093/heapro/dai022 10.1111/aswp.12214 10.2105/ajph.2008.154880 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.10.004 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100318 10.1177/1476750314529598 10.1093/heapro/11.4.333 10.1093/jamia/ocv094 10.1002/9781119171386 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x 10.3390/ijerph15040807 10.1111/ap.12277 10.1177/0896920513516025 10.1027/0227-5910/a000587 10.1186/s40900-021-00252-7 10.2196/17520 10.1027/0227-5910/a000696 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2022 2022. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2022 – notice: 2022. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISR 0-V 3V. 7TQ 7X7 7XB 88C 88E 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ALSLI ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DHY DON DPSOV DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. KC- M0S M0T M1P M2L PATMY PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PRQQA PYCSY 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-022-00835-0 |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Science in Context ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】 ProQuest Central (Corporate) PAIS Index ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Public Health Database Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest Agricultural & Environmental Science & Pollution Managment ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College PAIS International PAIS International (Ovid) Politics Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Politics Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database Medical Database Political Science Database Environmental Science Database (subscripiton) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Social Sciences Environmental Science Collection MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Politics Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest Political Science ProQuest Public Health ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health Management ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition PAIS International ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition) Environmental Science Database ProQuest Politics Collection ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals (Selected full-text) url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 5 dbid: BENPR name: AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Public Health Government |
| EISSN | 1478-4505 |
| EndPage | 19 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_a5d1bb08fa324d39a734eaafc4a7be7e PMC9009036 A700543901 35422050 10_1186_s12961_022_00835_0 |
| Genre | Systematic Review Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | Australia |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Australia |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0-V 0R~ 29I 2WC 44B 53G 5VS 7X7 7XC 88E 8C1 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS AQUVI ARALO ATCPS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DPSOV DU5 DWQXO E3Z EBD EBLON EBS ESX FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ISR ITC KC- KQ8 M0T M1P M2L M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PATMY PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PRQQA PSQYO PUEGO PYCSY PZZ RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ TR2 TUS UKHRP UNMZH W2D WOQ WOW XSB ~8M AAYXX ALIPV CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 3V. 7TQ 7XB 8FK AZQEC DHY DON GNUQQ K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-3520c09f33a2c05eaf66d4599566f113cddd1bf9d0da328ec1d467f7ec168c113 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 1478-4505 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:26:08 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 13:35:50 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 21:39:46 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 19:48:47 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:28:37 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:48:59 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 03:59:18 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:06:29 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:55:37 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:26:58 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:23:51 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Co-design Stakeholder Consumers Co-ideation Co-implementation Multisectoral collaborations Co-creation Suicide prevention Co-evaluation |
| Language | English |
| License | 2022. The Author(s). Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c641t-3520c09f33a2c05eaf66d4599566f113cddd1bf9d0da328ec1d467f7ec168c113 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-4 |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8772-5888 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/a5d1bb08fa324d39a734eaafc4a7be7e |
| PMID | 35422050 |
| PQID | 2652403967 |
| PQPubID | 44380 |
| PageCount | 19 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a5d1bb08fa324d39a734eaafc4a7be7e pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9009036 proquest_miscellaneous_2651687613 proquest_journals_2652403967 gale_infotracmisc_A700543901 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A700543901 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A700543901 pubmed_primary_35422050 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12961_022_00835_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12961_022_00835_0 springer_journals_10_1186_s12961_022_00835_0 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2022-04-14 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-04-14 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2022 text: 2022-04-14 day: 14 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Health research policy and systems |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | Health Res Policy Sys |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Health Res Policy Syst |
| PublicationYear | 2022 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
| References | SY Arafat (835_CR66) 2019; 2 D Van Garderen (835_CR75) 2012; 49 835_CR3 J Popay (835_CR18) 2006 B Nasir (835_CR41) 2017; 17 835_CR2 835_CR1 K Gryglewicz (835_CR39) 2014; 5 SK Orlowski (835_CR24) 2015; 2 A Knight (835_CR7) 2017; 41 C O'Grady (835_CR43) 2020; 22 N Cook (835_CR52) 2019; 9 MJ Grant (835_CR26) 2009; 26 LM Vaughn (835_CR61) 2020; 1 A Knight (835_CR6) 2018; 6 L Vijayakumar (835_CR51) 2021 KE Newcomer (835_CR59) 2015 C Holliday (835_CR40) 2018; 29 QN Hong (835_CR29) 2019; 111 FLH Chuah (835_CR33) 2018; 213 P Hung (835_CR79) 2021 J Trischler (835_CR53) 2019; 21 JN Pretty (835_CR31) 1995; 23 BA Israel (835_CR15) 2008 H Hjelmeland (835_CR62) 2010; 40 L Esmail (835_CR5) 2015; 4 J Robinson (835_CR72) 2018; 4–5 AR Khan (835_CR10) 2021; 15 S Platt (835_CR23) 2019 AN Chowdhury (835_CR37) 2013; 2013 KR Allison (835_CR65) 1996; 11 AM Bach-Mortensen (835_CR68) 2018; 7 Z Faridi (835_CR56) 2007; 4 A Anjum (835_CR11) 2020; 20 M Dillon (835_CR22) 2014; 12 DM Skerrett (835_CR45) 2018; 53 A Forte (835_CR73) 2021 N Jackson (835_CR27) 2005; 20 D Moher (835_CR28) 2009; 6 M Bird (835_CR13) 2021; 7 835_CR58 M Muhammad (835_CR60) 2015; 41 835_CR55 A O'Mara-Eves (835_CR19) 2013 T Pearce (835_CR9) 2020; 17 P Rodriguez Espinosa (835_CR67) 2021; 67 R Hardwick (835_CR69) 2015; 10 A Munro (835_CR8) 2017; 1 TN Le (835_CR42) 2015; 24 835_CR48 J Harris (835_CR34) 2018 M Van der Riet (835_CR16) 2009; 39 R Ford-Paz (835_CR38) 2015; 42 S Chaniang (835_CR47) 2019; 23 K Brown (835_CR36) 2020 835_CR71 835_CR70 J Bantjes (835_CR74) 2016 S Kuruvilla (835_CR77) 2018 B Mullany (835_CR50) 2009; 99 BN Williams (835_CR54) 2016; 18 P Attree (835_CR17) 2011; 19 M Semrau (835_CR25) 2016; 16 R Pace (835_CR30) 2012; 49 JM Bryson (835_CR57) 2011 J Allen (835_CR49) 2009; 68 LM Lawrence (835_CR12) 2019; 14 J Povey (835_CR44) 2020; 21 L Reifels (835_CR78) 2017 M Braun (835_CR35) 2020 KM Unertl (835_CR14) 2016; 23 J De Vente (835_CR20) 2016 835_CR32 835_CR76 P Thorn (835_CR46) 2020; 7 MJ Kral (835_CR63) 2012; 6 835_CR4 Y Salimi (835_CR64) 2012; 3 N Wallerstein (835_CR21) 2008; 2 R Freeman (835_CR80) 2001 |
| References_xml | – ident: 835_CR3 – volume: 23 start-page: 1247 issue: 8 year: 1995 ident: 835_CR31 publication-title: World Dev doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F – volume: 42 start-page: 519 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 835_CR38 publication-title: J Behav Health Serv Res doi: 10.1007/s11414-013-9368-5 – volume: 1 start-page: 13244 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 835_CR61 publication-title: J Participate Res Methods. doi: 10.35844/001c.13244 – volume: 17 start-page: 2229 issue: 7 year: 2020 ident: 835_CR9 publication-title: Int J Environ Res Public Health doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072229 – volume: 6 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 835_CR6 publication-title: Health Justice doi: 10.1186/s40352-018-0066-5 – volume: 2 start-page: 09 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 835_CR66 publication-title: Global Psychiatry. doi: 10.2478/gp-2019-0001 – year: 2011 ident: 835_CR57 publication-title: Eval Program Plan doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.001 – volume: 2013 year: 2013 ident: 835_CR37 publication-title: ISRN Psychiatry doi: 10.1155/2013/427417 – volume: 4 start-page: 1955426 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 835_CR56 publication-title: Prev Chronic Dis – volume: 29 start-page: 64 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 835_CR40 publication-title: J Transcult Nurs doi: 10.1177/1043659616679234 – volume: 17 start-page: 219 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 835_CR41 publication-title: BMC Psychiatry doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1380-5 – year: 2021 ident: 835_CR73 publication-title: Medicina (Kaunas) doi: 10.3390/medicina57020109 – ident: 835_CR58 – start-page: 189 volume-title: The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management year: 2001 ident: 835_CR80 – volume: 4 start-page: 133 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: 835_CR5 publication-title: J Comp Eff Res doi: 10.2217/cer.14.79 – ident: 835_CR2 – year: 2018 ident: 835_CR34 publication-title: BioMed Res Int doi: 10.1155/2018/9427452 – volume: 5 start-page: 47 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 835_CR39 publication-title: Int J Child Youth Family Stud. doi: 10.18357/ijcyfs.gryglewiczk.512014 – ident: 835_CR71 – ident: 835_CR48 – volume: 16 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 835_CR25 publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1323-8 – volume: 21 start-page: 1595 issue: 11 year: 2019 ident: 835_CR53 publication-title: Public Manag Rev doi: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1619810 – volume: 6 start-page: 236 issue: 3 year: 2012 ident: 835_CR63 publication-title: J Mixed Methods Res doi: 10.1177/1558689811423914 – year: 2018 ident: 835_CR77 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4771 – volume: 9 issue: 5 year: 2019 ident: 835_CR52 publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026514 – volume: 18 start-page: 692 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: 835_CR54 publication-title: Public Manag Rev doi: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1111660 – volume: 41 start-page: 54 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 835_CR7 publication-title: Australian N Z J Public Health doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12573 – volume: 14 start-page: 55 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 835_CR12 publication-title: Healthc Policy doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2019.25792 – year: 2016 ident: 835_CR74 publication-title: Global Mental Health. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2016.27 – ident: 835_CR55 – volume: 49 start-page: 47 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 835_CR30 publication-title: Int J Nurs Stud doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002 – volume: 40 start-page: 74 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 835_CR62 publication-title: Suicide Life Threat Behav doi: 10.1521/suli.2010.40.1.74 – year: 2021 ident: 835_CR79 publication-title: Psychiatr Serv doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000203 – volume: 67 start-page: 312 issue: 3–4 year: 2021 ident: 835_CR67 publication-title: Am J Community Psychol doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12469 – volume: 39 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 835_CR16 publication-title: South Afr J Psychol doi: 10.1177/008124630903900101 – year: 2021 ident: 835_CR51 publication-title: Lancet Psychiatry doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00152-8 – volume: 20 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 835_CR11 publication-title: Pakistan BMC Public Health doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09081-x – volume: 19 start-page: 250 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 835_CR17 publication-title: Health Soc Care Commun doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00976.x – year: 2013 ident: 835_CR19 publication-title: Public Health Res doi: 10.3310/phr01040 – volume: 2 start-page: 371 year: 2008 ident: 835_CR21 publication-title: CBPR doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25894.11844 – volume: 10 start-page: 84 year: 2015 ident: 835_CR69 publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0265-6 – ident: 835_CR76 – volume: 6 start-page: e1000097 issue: 7 year: 2009 ident: 835_CR28 publication-title: PLoS Med doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 – year: 2016 ident: 835_CR20 publication-title: Ecol Soc doi: 10.5751/ES-08053-210224 – volume: 111 issue: 49–59 year: 2019 ident: 835_CR29 publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.008 – volume: 22 issue: 7 year: 2020 ident: 835_CR43 publication-title: J Med Internet Res doi: 10.2196/17481 – ident: 835_CR1 – volume: 7 start-page: 13 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 835_CR68 publication-title: Syst Rev doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0681-1 – volume: 2 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: 835_CR24 publication-title: JMIR Hum Factors doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.4361 – start-page: 47 volume-title: Critical issues in developing and following community-based participatory research principles year: 2008 ident: 835_CR15 – volume: 68 start-page: 274 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: 835_CR49 publication-title: Int J Circumpolar Health doi: 10.3402/ijch.v68i3.18328 – volume: 24 start-page: 12 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: 835_CR42 publication-title: J Child Fam Stud doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9809-z – volume: 49 start-page: 483 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: 835_CR75 publication-title: Psychol Sch doi: 10.1002/pits.21610 – year: 2020 ident: 835_CR36 publication-title: Soc Sci Med doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113015 – volume: 213 start-page: 106 year: 2018 ident: 835_CR33 publication-title: Soc Sci Med doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.019 – volume: 1 start-page: 8 year: 2017 ident: 835_CR8 publication-title: Aust J Rural Health doi: 10.1111/ajr.12345 – volume: 20 start-page: 3670374 issue: 4 year: 2005 ident: 835_CR27 publication-title: Health Promot Int doi: 10.1093/heapro/dai022 – volume: 23 start-page: 201 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 835_CR47 publication-title: Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res Thail. – volume: 15 start-page: 15 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 835_CR10 publication-title: Asian Soc Work Pol Rev doi: 10.1111/aswp.12214 – ident: 835_CR4 – volume: 99 start-page: 1840 issue: 10 year: 2009 ident: 835_CR50 publication-title: Am J Public Health doi: 10.2105/ajph.2008.154880 – volume: 4–5 start-page: 52 year: 2018 ident: 835_CR72 publication-title: EClinicalMedicine doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.10.004 – volume: 21 year: 2020 ident: 835_CR44 publication-title: Internet Interv doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100318 – volume: 12 start-page: 209 issue: 2 year: 2014 ident: 835_CR22 publication-title: Action Res doi: 10.1177/1476750314529598 – volume: 11 start-page: 333 issue: 4 year: 1996 ident: 835_CR65 publication-title: Health Promot Int doi: 10.1093/heapro/11.4.333 – volume: 23 start-page: 60 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 835_CR14 publication-title: JAMIA Open doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv094 – volume-title: Handbook of practical program evaluation year: 2015 ident: 835_CR59 doi: 10.1002/9781119171386 – volume: 26 start-page: 91 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 835_CR26 publication-title: Health Info Libr J doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x – year: 2017 ident: 835_CR78 publication-title: Int J Environ Res Public Health doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040807 – volume: 53 start-page: 13 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 835_CR45 publication-title: Aust Psychol doi: 10.1111/ap.12277 – volume: 41 start-page: 1045 issue: 7–8 year: 2015 ident: 835_CR60 publication-title: Crit Sociol doi: 10.1177/0896920513516025 – volume-title: Community engagement for health improvement: questions of definition, outcomes and evaluation. A background paper prepared for NICE year: 2006 ident: 835_CR18 – ident: 835_CR32 – year: 2019 ident: 835_CR23 publication-title: Crisis doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000587 – ident: 835_CR70 – volume: 7 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 835_CR13 publication-title: Res Involv Engageme doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00252-7 – volume: 7 issue: 5 year: 2020 ident: 835_CR46 publication-title: JMIR mental health doi: 10.2196/17520 – volume: 3 start-page: 386 issue: 6 year: 2012 ident: 835_CR64 publication-title: Int J Prev Med – year: 2020 ident: 835_CR35 publication-title: Crisis doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000696 |
| SSID | ssj0022932 |
| Score | 2.3646967 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Background
Governments and third-sector organizations (TSOs) require support to reduce suicide mortality through funding of suicide prevention services and... Governments and third-sector organizations (TSOs) require support to reduce suicide mortality through funding of suicide prevention services and innovative... Background Governments and third-sector organizations (TSOs) require support to reduce suicide mortality through funding of suicide prevention services and... Abstract Background Governments and third-sector organizations (TSOs) require support to reduce suicide mortality through funding of suicide prevention... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 40 |
| SubjectTerms | Analysis Australia Caregivers Co-creation Co-design Co-ideation Collaboration Consumers Data collection Data quality Design analysis Evaluation Funding Government Health Administration Health aspects Health Policy Health Services Research Heterogeneity Humans Interest groups Keywords Knowledge Literature reviews Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mental health Meta-analysis Mixed methods research Mortality Multisectoral collaborations Organizations Participation Power Prevention Public Health Public policy Qualitative Research R & D/Technology Policy Research design Research methodology Review Services Stakeholder Stakeholders Subject heading schemes Suicidal behavior Suicide Suicide Prevention Suicides & suicide attempts Systematic review Underserved populations |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT0gI8SZQkEFIHMCqk_gRHxdEVZDgAFTqzXL8gEhtUpFdqT-_YzvZboqAC7fd9WQ3mRnPa8ffIPTKmNJ7U3MiTKMI5BuKGKEkkS3Eto76WiY4hs9fxNEx-3TCT3ZGfcWesAwPnBl3YLgr25Y2wYDrd7UysmbemGCZka2XPlpfquicTE2pFjixaj4i04iDEbyagLQZEq8UcxC6cEMJrf93m7zjlK43TF771zQ5o8M76PYUReJVvvu76Ibv76FbuQSH88mi--h0hc-6C-9InhI94ivUZpxPrOAh4HHT2c55fD5hOQ097nb6IEd4BxYslh1waj4cU5kffnyhQeMDdHz44fv7IzINVyBWsHJNIPCilqpQ16aylHsThHAswo8JEcqyts4B44Ny1AHnG29LBzY1SHghGgsED9FeP_T-McLec25DHLFuKGsh4lOcsQq-XlhpVWsLVM681nZCHo8DME51ykAaobN8NMhHJ_loWqA322vOM-7GX6nfRRFuKSNmdvoANElPmqT_pUkFehkVQEdUjD623fwwm3HUH7991SsZQ9tYHirQ64koDPAM1kynGIATEUhrQbm_oIRta5fLs57pyWyMuhI84iMqIQv0Yrscr4ytcL0fNokGJCAhDCvQo6yW2-eueeQ7B37IhcIuGLNc6bufCVRc0VixEwV6O6v21W39mfFP_gfjn6KbVdqajJRsH-2tf238Mwj11u3ztKsvAcXjUdQ priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELdG94KEEN8EBjIIiQew5iT-SB4Q6tCmgUSFBpP2Zjm2MyKNpCytxJ_P2XHaZYi9NfUl7Z3P5_Pl7ncIvdE6dU7nnAhdlATOGyXRopREVuDbWupyGeAYvi7E8Sn7csbPdtBirIXxaZWjTQyG2nbGx8j3M8E9dFwp5Mflb-K7Rvm3q2MLDR1bK9gPAWLsFtoFk8zpDO0eHC6-nWyOYLC5ZWPpTCH2e9jtBByn4UAWfBFCJ9tTQPH_11Zf2ayuJ1Jee5saNqmje-hu9C7xfFCH-2jHtQ_QnSE0h4eKo4foYo5_NX-cJUP36B5v0ZzxUMmCuxr368Y01uFlxHjqWtxcyY_s4Qosmw9H4JCU2IfwP_z4RLP6R-j06PDHp2MSmy4QI1i6IuCQUUPLOs91Zih3uhbCMg9LJkSdprmx1qZVXVpqdZ4VzqQWbG0t4YMoDBA8RrO2a91ThJ3j3NS-9bqmrAJPsOSMZfB4YaQpK5OgdJS1MhGR3DfGuFDhZFIINcyPgvlRYX4UTdC7zT3LAY_jRuoDP4UbSo-lHb7oLs9VXJpKc2CookUN_DCbl1rmzGldG6Zl5aRL0GuvAMqjZbQ-Hedcr_teff5-oubSu7w-bJSgt5Go7oAHo2N1A0jCA2xNKPcmlLCczXR41DMVzUmvtsqfoFebYX-nT5FrXbcONDADEtyzBD0Z1HLDd8693DnIQ04UdiKY6Ujb_Axg4yX1kTyRoPejam__1v8F_-xmLp6j21lYdIykbA_NVpdr9wKcu1X1Mq7Yv1MgTgc priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bi9QwFA6ygggiut6qq0QRfNBg2ubSPI6DyyqsD-rCvoU0l3VgbRc7A_58T9JMd7pewLfp5KQ055ycW5IvCL00pvTe1JwI0ygC-YYiRihJZAuxraO-lgmO4fiTODphH0_5aYbJiWdhdtfvy0a8HcAfCUh4IWVK0QKB9Pw6B8MbtXkpllNyBW6r2h6K-WO_meNJ-Py_W-EdN3R1i-SVddLkfg7voNs5bsSLUdB30TXf7aMbx3llfB_dGutveDxWdA-dL_D31U_vyHhF9IAvIZvxeFwF9wEPG-juPL7IQE59h1c7myAHeALzFWsOOO08HFKNH75jpj7DfXRy-P7r8ojkmxWIFaxcE4i6qKUq1LWpLOXeBCEci9hjQoSyrK1zrmyDctSZumq8LR0Y1CDhh2gsEDxAe13f-UcIe8-5DfF-dUNZC-Ge4oxV8HphpVWtLVC5Zbu2GXY83n5xrlP60Qg9ikqDqHQSlaYFej31uRhBN_5J_S5Kc6KMgNnpD9AjneefNhwG1NImwHiYq5WRNfPGBMuMbL30BXoRdUFHSIwu7rk5M5th0B--fNYLGePaWBsq0KtMFHoYgzX5CANwIqJozSgPZpQwZ-28eatyOtuMQVeCR3BEJWSBnk_NsWfcB9f5fpNoQAISYrACPRw1dBp3zSPfOfBDznR3xph5S7f6lhDFFY3lOlGgN1stv_ysvzP-8f-RP0E3qzQfGSnZAdpb_9j4pxDRrdtnaSr_AuoKQ3o priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | A mixed-methods systematic review of suicide prevention interventions involving multisectoral collaborations |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-022-00835-0 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422050 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2652403967 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2651687613 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9009036 https://doaj.org/article/a5d1bb08fa324d39a734eaafc4a7be7e |
| Volume | 20 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwED-N7QUJIb4JjMogJB4gLB-OnTwg1FabBhITKlSqeLEc2xmRSjKaVhr_PWcn6ZYx9hI19SWtz3e-O_v8O4DXUobGyDjxmUwzH-ONzJcs4z7P0bfVgYm5g2P4csKO5_TzIlnsQF_uqGNgc21oZ-tJzVfL9-e__3xEhf_gFD5lBw3aLIZBMYZVzqPwMYTfc_tFNpWPbncVIjRtbveTYuRE0fT3h2iufcfAUDk8_39n7Utm62pK5ZV9VWeuju7B3c7PJONWMO7DjqkewJ12kY60Z48ewnJMfpXnRvttHemGXOA6k_ZMC6kL0mxKVWpDzjq0p7oi5aVMyQbvcI6zCxPEpSc2biMAf3wgY80jmB8dfp8e-135BV8xGq59dM0CFWRFHMtIBYmRBWOaWoAyxoowjJXWOsyLTAdaxlFqVKhx1i04fmCpQoLHsFvVlXkKxJgkUYUtwi4DmqNPmCWURvh6prjKcuVB2PNaqA6b3JbIWAoXo6RMtOMjcHyEGx8RePB2-8xZi8xxI_XEDuGW0qJquy_q1anolFTIBDuUB2mB_aE6ziSPqZGyUFTy3HDjwSsrAMLiZlQ2MedUbppGfPo2E2NunV-7gOTBm46oqLEPSnbnHJATFmprQLk_oETFVsPmXs5ErxciYolFUMwY9-Dlttk-aZPlKlNvHA2OAEdHzYMnrVhu-x0nlu8J8oMPBHbAmGFLVf50sONZYNf0mAfvetG--Fv_Z_yzmzv5HG5HTumoH9J92F2vNuYFunnrfAS3-ILjNZ2GI9ibHJ58neHdlE1HbuFk5HQbr7PJj7_5ElJR |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR1db9Mw8DS6B5AQ4pvAAINAPEC0fDh28jChDjatbKvQ2KS9Gcd2RqWRlKUV8Of4bZydpF2G2Nve2vqS1Hfn-8p9ALySMjRGxonPZJr56G9kvmQZ93mOtq0OTMxdO4b9Mds5op-Ok-MV-NPVwti0yk4mOkGtK2Vj5OsRS2zruIzx99Mfvp0aZd-udiM0ZDtaQW-4FmNtYceu-f0TXbh6Y_QR6f06ira3Dj_s-O2UAV8xGs58tEACFWRFHMtIBYmRBWOa2j5cjBVhGCutdZgXmQ60jKPUqFCjcCk4fmCpQgC87zVYpTaAMoDVza3x54OFy4fKNOpKdVK2XqN2Zei-owPobB8_6KlDNzXgX91wTjleTNy88PbWKcXt23CrtWbJsGG_O7BiyrtwswkFkqbC6R6cDsn3yS-j_WZadU2W3aNJUzlDqoLU84maaEOmbU-pqiSTc_mYNX5DSWrDH8QlQdbudQM-vMfJ9X04uhL0P4BBWZXmERBjkkQVdtS7DGiOlmeWUBrh7ZniKsuVB2GHa6HaDuh2EMepcJ5QykRDH4H0EY4-IvDg7eKaadP_41LoTUvCBaTt3e1-qM5ORCsKhExwQ3mQFrgfquNM8pgaKQtFJc8NNx68tAwgbHeO0qb_nMh5XYvRlwMx5NbEtmEqD960QEWFe1CyraZATNiGXj3ItR4kig_VX-74TLTiqxbLw-bBi8WyvdKm5JWmmjsYpABHc9CDhw1bLvaNZ8EWcCM-eI9he4jpr5STb665eRbYyCHz4F3H2su_9X_EP758F8_h-s7h_p7YG413n8CNyB1A6od0DQazs7l5ioblLH_Wnl4CX69aYPwFCM-LBg |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Zb9QwELZQK1VICEG5AgUMQuIBoubwET-GY9UutEKUSn2zHB9lpZKsml2Jn8_YOboph8TbZj2O4vGMZ8ae-YzQK6VSa1VOY6YKEUO8IWLFBI95Bb6tSWzOAxzD0TE7OCXzM3q2UcUfst2HI8mupsGjNNWr_aVxnYoXbL8FK8UgDIZAKvgQMQTt2wUVAsKv7bKcn8zHoAvMWTYUy_yx58QgBdz-31fnDfN0PXXy2vlpMEuzO-h270_ishOAu-iGrXfRzlF_Yr6LbnX7crgrN7qHLkr8Y_HTmri7OrrFV1DOuCtjwY3D7Rq6G4uXPcBTU-PFRnJkC0-wrPm9CBwyEtuw9w_fMRGr9j46nX389v4g7m9ciDUj6SoGbyzRiXB5rjKdUKscY4Z4TDLGXJrm2hiTVk6YxKg8K6xODSy0jsMPVmggeIC26qa2jxC2llLt_L3rKiEVuIGCEpLB65nmWlQ6QunAdql7OHJ_K8aFDGFJwWQ3VRKmSoapkkmE3ox9lh0Yxz-p3_nZHCk9kHb4o7k8l71eSkVhQFVSOBgPMblQPCdWKaeJ4pXlNkIvvSxID5VR-1ycc7VuW3l48lWW3Pu7fs8oQq97ItfAGLTqSxuAEx5da0K5N6EEXdbT5kHkZL-WtDJj1IMmCsYj9GJs9j19flxtm3WggRng4JtF6GEnoeO4c-r5ToEffCK7E8ZMW-rF94A0LhK_jcci9HaQ8qvP-jvjH_8f-XO08-XDTH4-PP70BN3MgmqSOCV7aGt1ubZPwelbVc96vf4FWYdQJw |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+mixed-methods+systematic+review+of+suicide+prevention+interventions+involving+multisectoral+collaborations&rft.jtitle=Health+research+policy+and+systems&rft.au=Pearce%2C+Tania&rft.au=Maple%2C+Myfanwy&rft.au=Wayland%2C+Sarah&rft.au=McKay%2C+Kathy&rft.date=2022-04-14&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1478-4505&rft.eissn=1478-4505&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12961-022-00835-0&rft.externalDocID=A700543901 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1478-4505&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1478-4505&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1478-4505&client=summon |