How to collect non-medical data in a pediatric trial: diaries or interviews

Background Non-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic strategies. For chronic pediatric conditions, the time that patients and caregivers spend in seeking and providing care (which are the indir...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 36 - 7
Main Authors Le Jeannic, Anaïs, Maoulida, Hassani, Guilmin-Crépon, Sophie, Alberti, Corinne, Tubiana-Rufi, Nadia, Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 07.01.2020
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1745-6215
1745-6215
DOI10.1186/s13063-019-3997-9

Cover

Abstract Background Non-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic strategies. For chronic pediatric conditions, the time that patients and caregivers spend in seeking and providing care (which are the indirect costs in an economic evaluation) can be significantly different depending on the treatment arm. To explore methods for collecting information on the care burden for caregivers and patients, we investigated whether a patient diary provided additional information compared to retrospective investigator-led interviews and whether a diary that was completed intermittently produced more or less information than a diary completed continually. The main objective of this study was to identify which type of data collection was most effective for measuring the time spent by caregivers and for estimating indirect treatment costs over 9 months. Methods Start-In! is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of three strategies of real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. We designed an ancillary study to assess methods of collecting information on the time spent by patients and caregivers in managing their condition (indirect costs). Data were entered retrospectively in case report forms (CRFs) by investigators during quarterly follow-up visits, which were supplemented with diaries completed prospectively by children or caregivers either continuously or intermittently. Data about absences from school and work as well as the time that caregivers spent on diabetes care were collected and the three collection methods were compared. Results At the end of the 9-month study, 42% of the study participants failed to return their diary. For the diaries that were received, less than 10% of expected data were collected versus 82% during investigators'interviews. Based on all the information collected, we calculated that over 9 months, caregivers lost on average 3.9 days of working time (€786) and 4 days of personal time, i.e. the equivalent of €526, and spent around 15 min of time on care per day, i.e. the equivalent of €1700. Conclusions The CRFs completed by investigators during quarterly visits cannot be replaced by a diary. Completing the diaries appeared to represent an important additional burden to children and their caregivers, and the diaries provided little additional information compared to investigators’ entries in the CRF. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00949221 . Registered on 30 July 2009. Registry name: Study of Insulin Therapy Augmented by Real Time Sensor in Type 1 Children and Adolescents (START-IN!).
AbstractList BackgroundNon-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic strategies. For chronic pediatric conditions, the time that patients and caregivers spend in seeking and providing care (which are the indirect costs in an economic evaluation) can be significantly different depending on the treatment arm. To explore methods for collecting information on the care burden for caregivers and patients, we investigated whether a patient diary provided additional information compared to retrospective investigator-led interviews and whether a diary that was completed intermittently produced more or less information than a diary completed continually. The main objective of this study was to identify which type of data collection was most effective for measuring the time spent by caregivers and for estimating indirect treatment costs over 9 months.MethodsStart-In! is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of three strategies of real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. We designed an ancillary study to assess methods of collecting information on the time spent by patients and caregivers in managing their condition (indirect costs). Data were entered retrospectively in case report forms (CRFs) by investigators during quarterly follow-up visits, which were supplemented with diaries completed prospectively by children or caregivers either continuously or intermittently. Data about absences from school and work as well as the time that caregivers spent on diabetes care were collected and the three collection methods were compared.ResultsAt the end of the 9-month study, 42% of the study participants failed to return their diary. For the diaries that were received, less than 10% of expected data were collected versus 82% during investigators'interviews. Based on all the information collected, we calculated that over 9 months, caregivers lost on average 3.9 days of working time (€786) and 4 days of personal time, i.e. the equivalent of €526, and spent around 15 min of time on care per day, i.e. the equivalent of €1700.ConclusionsThe CRFs completed by investigators during quarterly visits cannot be replaced by a diary. Completing the diaries appeared to represent an important additional burden to children and their caregivers, and the diaries provided little additional information compared to investigators’ entries in the CRF.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00949221. Registered on 30 July 2009. Registry name: Study of Insulin Therapy Augmented by Real Time Sensor in Type 1 Children and Adolescents (START-IN!).
Abstract Background Non-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic strategies. For chronic pediatric conditions, the time that patients and caregivers spend in seeking and providing care (which are the indirect costs in an economic evaluation) can be significantly different depending on the treatment arm. To explore methods for collecting information on the care burden for caregivers and patients, we investigated whether a patient diary provided additional information compared to retrospective investigator-led interviews and whether a diary that was completed intermittently produced more or less information than a diary completed continually. The main objective of this study was to identify which type of data collection was most effective for measuring the time spent by caregivers and for estimating indirect treatment costs over 9 months. Methods Start-In! is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of three strategies of real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. We designed an ancillary study to assess methods of collecting information on the time spent by patients and caregivers in managing their condition (indirect costs). Data were entered retrospectively in case report forms (CRFs) by investigators during quarterly follow-up visits, which were supplemented with diaries completed prospectively by children or caregivers either continuously or intermittently. Data about absences from school and work as well as the time that caregivers spent on diabetes care were collected and the three collection methods were compared. Results At the end of the 9-month study, 42% of the study participants failed to return their diary. For the diaries that were received, less than 10% of expected data were collected versus 82% during investigators'interviews. Based on all the information collected, we calculated that over 9 months, caregivers lost on average 3.9 days of working time (€786) and 4 days of personal time, i.e. the equivalent of €526, and spent around 15 min of time on care per day, i.e. the equivalent of €1700. Conclusions The CRFs completed by investigators during quarterly visits cannot be replaced by a diary. Completing the diaries appeared to represent an important additional burden to children and their caregivers, and the diaries provided little additional information compared to investigators’ entries in the CRF. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00949221. Registered on 30 July 2009. Registry name: Study of Insulin Therapy Augmented by Real Time Sensor in Type 1 Children and Adolescents (START-IN!).
BACKGROUND:Non-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic strategies. For chronic pediatric conditions, the time that patients and caregivers spend in seeking and providing care (which are the indirect costs in an economic evaluation) can be significantly different depending on the treatment arm. To explore methods for collecting information on the care burden for caregivers and patients, we investigated whether a patient diary provided additional information compared to retrospective investigator-led interviews and whether a diary that was completed intermittently produced more or less information than a diary completed continually. The main objective of this study was to identify which type of data collection was most effective for measuring the time spent by caregivers and for estimating indirect treatment costs over 9 months.METHODS:Start-In! is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of three strategies of real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. We designed an ancillary study to assess methods of collecting information on the time spent by patients and caregivers in managing their condition (indirect costs). Data were entered retrospectively in case report forms (CRFs) by investigators during quarterly follow-up visits, which were supplemented with diaries completed prospectively by children or caregivers either continuously or intermittently. Data about absences from school and work as well as the time that caregivers spent on diabetes care were collected and the three collection methods were compared.RESULTS:At the end of the 9-month study, 42% of the study participants failed to return their diary. For the diaries that were received, less than 10% of expected data were collected versus 82% during investigators'interviews. Based on all the information collected, we calculated that over 9 months, caregivers lost on average 3.9 days of working time (€786) and 4 days of personal time, i.e. the equivalent of €526, and spent around 15 min of time on care per day, i.e. the equivalent of €1700.CONCLUSIONS:The CRFs completed by investigators during quarterly visits cannot be replaced by a diary. Completing the diaries appeared to represent an important additional burden to children and their caregivers, and the diaries provided little additional information compared to investigators' entries in the CRF.TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00949221. Registered on 30 July 2009. Registry name: Study of Insulin Therapy Augmented by Real Time Sensor in Type 1 Children and Adolescents (START-IN!).
Non-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic strategies. For chronic pediatric conditions, the time that patients and caregivers spend in seeking and providing care (which are the indirect costs in an economic evaluation) can be significantly different depending on the treatment arm. To explore methods for collecting information on the care burden for caregivers and patients, we investigated whether a patient diary provided additional information compared to retrospective investigator-led interviews and whether a diary that was completed intermittently produced more or less information than a diary completed continually. The main objective of this study was to identify which type of data collection was most effective for measuring the time spent by caregivers and for estimating indirect treatment costs over 9 months.BACKGROUNDNon-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic strategies. For chronic pediatric conditions, the time that patients and caregivers spend in seeking and providing care (which are the indirect costs in an economic evaluation) can be significantly different depending on the treatment arm. To explore methods for collecting information on the care burden for caregivers and patients, we investigated whether a patient diary provided additional information compared to retrospective investigator-led interviews and whether a diary that was completed intermittently produced more or less information than a diary completed continually. The main objective of this study was to identify which type of data collection was most effective for measuring the time spent by caregivers and for estimating indirect treatment costs over 9 months.Start-In! is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of three strategies of real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. We designed an ancillary study to assess methods of collecting information on the time spent by patients and caregivers in managing their condition (indirect costs). Data were entered retrospectively in case report forms (CRFs) by investigators during quarterly follow-up visits, which were supplemented with diaries completed prospectively by children or caregivers either continuously or intermittently. Data about absences from school and work as well as the time that caregivers spent on diabetes care were collected and the three collection methods were compared.METHODSStart-In! is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of three strategies of real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. We designed an ancillary study to assess methods of collecting information on the time spent by patients and caregivers in managing their condition (indirect costs). Data were entered retrospectively in case report forms (CRFs) by investigators during quarterly follow-up visits, which were supplemented with diaries completed prospectively by children or caregivers either continuously or intermittently. Data about absences from school and work as well as the time that caregivers spent on diabetes care were collected and the three collection methods were compared.At the end of the 9-month study, 42% of the study participants failed to return their diary. For the diaries that were received, less than 10% of expected data were collected versus 82% during investigators'interviews. Based on all the information collected, we calculated that over 9 months, caregivers lost on average 3.9 days of working time (€786) and 4 days of personal time, i.e. the equivalent of €526, and spent around 15 min of time on care per day, i.e. the equivalent of €1700.RESULTSAt the end of the 9-month study, 42% of the study participants failed to return their diary. For the diaries that were received, less than 10% of expected data were collected versus 82% during investigators'interviews. Based on all the information collected, we calculated that over 9 months, caregivers lost on average 3.9 days of working time (€786) and 4 days of personal time, i.e. the equivalent of €526, and spent around 15 min of time on care per day, i.e. the equivalent of €1700.The CRFs completed by investigators during quarterly visits cannot be replaced by a diary. Completing the diaries appeared to represent an important additional burden to children and their caregivers, and the diaries provided little additional information compared to investigators' entries in the CRF.CONCLUSIONSThe CRFs completed by investigators during quarterly visits cannot be replaced by a diary. Completing the diaries appeared to represent an important additional burden to children and their caregivers, and the diaries provided little additional information compared to investigators' entries in the CRF.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00949221. Registered on 30 July 2009. Registry name: Study of Insulin Therapy Augmented by Real Time Sensor in Type 1 Children and Adolescents (START-IN!).TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00949221. Registered on 30 July 2009. Registry name: Study of Insulin Therapy Augmented by Real Time Sensor in Type 1 Children and Adolescents (START-IN!).
Non-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic strategies. For chronic pediatric conditions, the time that patients and caregivers spend in seeking and providing care (which are the indirect costs in an economic evaluation) can be significantly different depending on the treatment arm. To explore methods for collecting information on the care burden for caregivers and patients, we investigated whether a patient diary provided additional information compared to retrospective investigator-led interviews and whether a diary that was completed intermittently produced more or less information than a diary completed continually. The main objective of this study was to identify which type of data collection was most effective for measuring the time spent by caregivers and for estimating indirect treatment costs over 9 months. Start-In! is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of three strategies of real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. We designed an ancillary study to assess methods of collecting information on the time spent by patients and caregivers in managing their condition (indirect costs). Data were entered retrospectively in case report forms (CRFs) by investigators during quarterly follow-up visits, which were supplemented with diaries completed prospectively by children or caregivers either continuously or intermittently. Data about absences from school and work as well as the time that caregivers spent on diabetes care were collected and the three collection methods were compared. At the end of the 9-month study, 42% of the study participants failed to return their diary. For the diaries that were received, less than 10% of expected data were collected versus 82% during investigators'interviews. Based on all the information collected, we calculated that over 9 months, caregivers lost on average 3.9 days of working time ([euro]786) and 4 days of personal time, i.e. the equivalent of [euro]526, and spent around 15 min of time on care per day, i.e. the equivalent of [euro]1700. The CRFs completed by investigators during quarterly visits cannot be replaced by a diary. Completing the diaries appeared to represent an important additional burden to children and their caregivers, and the diaries provided little additional information compared to investigators' entries in the CRF.
Background Non-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic strategies. For chronic pediatric conditions, the time that patients and caregivers spend in seeking and providing care (which are the indirect costs in an economic evaluation) can be significantly different depending on the treatment arm. To explore methods for collecting information on the care burden for caregivers and patients, we investigated whether a patient diary provided additional information compared to retrospective investigator-led interviews and whether a diary that was completed intermittently produced more or less information than a diary completed continually. The main objective of this study was to identify which type of data collection was most effective for measuring the time spent by caregivers and for estimating indirect treatment costs over 9 months. Methods Start-In! is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of three strategies of real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. We designed an ancillary study to assess methods of collecting information on the time spent by patients and caregivers in managing their condition (indirect costs). Data were entered retrospectively in case report forms (CRFs) by investigators during quarterly follow-up visits, which were supplemented with diaries completed prospectively by children or caregivers either continuously or intermittently. Data about absences from school and work as well as the time that caregivers spent on diabetes care were collected and the three collection methods were compared. Results At the end of the 9-month study, 42% of the study participants failed to return their diary. For the diaries that were received, less than 10% of expected data were collected versus 82% during investigators'interviews. Based on all the information collected, we calculated that over 9 months, caregivers lost on average 3.9 days of working time ([euro]786) and 4 days of personal time, i.e. the equivalent of [euro]526, and spent around 15 min of time on care per day, i.e. the equivalent of [euro]1700. Conclusions The CRFs completed by investigators during quarterly visits cannot be replaced by a diary. Completing the diaries appeared to represent an important additional burden to children and their caregivers, and the diaries provided little additional information compared to investigators' entries in the CRF. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00949221. Registered on 30 July 2009. Registry name: Study of Insulin Therapy Augmented by Real Time Sensor in Type 1 Children and Adolescents (START-IN!). Keywords: patient diary, data collection, time costs, investigator-led interview
Background Non-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic strategies. For chronic pediatric conditions, the time that patients and caregivers spend in seeking and providing care (which are the indirect costs in an economic evaluation) can be significantly different depending on the treatment arm. To explore methods for collecting information on the care burden for caregivers and patients, we investigated whether a patient diary provided additional information compared to retrospective investigator-led interviews and whether a diary that was completed intermittently produced more or less information than a diary completed continually. The main objective of this study was to identify which type of data collection was most effective for measuring the time spent by caregivers and for estimating indirect treatment costs over 9 months. Methods Start-In! is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of three strategies of real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. We designed an ancillary study to assess methods of collecting information on the time spent by patients and caregivers in managing their condition (indirect costs). Data were entered retrospectively in case report forms (CRFs) by investigators during quarterly follow-up visits, which were supplemented with diaries completed prospectively by children or caregivers either continuously or intermittently. Data about absences from school and work as well as the time that caregivers spent on diabetes care were collected and the three collection methods were compared. Results At the end of the 9-month study, 42% of the study participants failed to return their diary. For the diaries that were received, less than 10% of expected data were collected versus 82% during investigators'interviews. Based on all the information collected, we calculated that over 9 months, caregivers lost on average 3.9 days of working time (€786) and 4 days of personal time, i.e. the equivalent of €526, and spent around 15 min of time on care per day, i.e. the equivalent of €1700. Conclusions The CRFs completed by investigators during quarterly visits cannot be replaced by a diary. Completing the diaries appeared to represent an important additional burden to children and their caregivers, and the diaries provided little additional information compared to investigators’ entries in the CRF. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00949221 . Registered on 30 July 2009. Registry name: Study of Insulin Therapy Augmented by Real Time Sensor in Type 1 Children and Adolescents (START-IN!).
Non-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic strategies. For chronic pediatric conditions, the time that patients and caregivers spend in seeking and providing care (which are the indirect costs in an economic evaluation) can be significantly different depending on the treatment arm. To explore methods for collecting information on the care burden for caregivers and patients, we investigated whether a patient diary provided additional information compared to retrospective investigator-led interviews and whether a diary that was completed intermittently produced more or less information than a diary completed continually. The main objective of this study was to identify which type of data collection was most effective for measuring the time spent by caregivers and for estimating indirect treatment costs over 9 months. Start-In! is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of three strategies of real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. We designed an ancillary study to assess methods of collecting information on the time spent by patients and caregivers in managing their condition (indirect costs). Data were entered retrospectively in case report forms (CRFs) by investigators during quarterly follow-up visits, which were supplemented with diaries completed prospectively by children or caregivers either continuously or intermittently. Data about absences from school and work as well as the time that caregivers spent on diabetes care were collected and the three collection methods were compared. At the end of the 9-month study, 42% of the study participants failed to return their diary. For the diaries that were received, less than 10% of expected data were collected versus 82% during investigators'interviews. Based on all the information collected, we calculated that over 9 months, caregivers lost on average 3.9 days of working time (€786) and 4 days of personal time, i.e. the equivalent of €526, and spent around 15 min of time on care per day, i.e. the equivalent of €1700. The CRFs completed by investigators during quarterly visits cannot be replaced by a diary. Completing the diaries appeared to represent an important additional burden to children and their caregivers, and the diaries provided little additional information compared to investigators' entries in the CRF. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00949221. Registered on 30 July 2009. Registry name: Study of Insulin Therapy Augmented by Real Time Sensor in Type 1 Children and Adolescents (START-IN!).
ArticleNumber 36
Audience Academic
Author Le Jeannic, Anaïs
Tubiana-Rufi, Nadia
Guilmin-Crépon, Sophie
Maoulida, Hassani
Alberti, Corinne
Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Anaïs
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5982-1522
  surname: Le Jeannic
  fullname: Le Jeannic, Anaïs
  email: anais.lejeannic@urc-eco.fr
  organization: AP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Hôtel-Dieu, URC Economie de la Santé Ile de France, Inserm, ECEVE UMR-S 1123, URC Eco IdF (Paris health economics and health services research unit) and Inserm, ECEVE UMR-S 1123
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hassani
  surname: Maoulida
  fullname: Maoulida, Hassani
  organization: AP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Hôtel-Dieu, URC Economie de la Santé Ile de France
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Sophie
  surname: Guilmin-Crépon
  fullname: Guilmin-Crépon, Sophie
  organization: Inserm, ECEVE UMR-S 1123, AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Robert Debré, Unité d’Epidémiologie clinique, Université Paris Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, Hôpital Robert Debré, Service d’Endocrinologie-Diabétologie pédiatrique et Centre de référence des Maladies Endocriniennes Rares de la Croissance, CIC-EC 1426
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Corinne
  surname: Alberti
  fullname: Alberti, Corinne
  organization: Inserm, ECEVE UMR-S 1123, AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Robert Debré, Unité d’Epidémiologie clinique, Université Paris Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, CIC-EC 1426
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Nadia
  surname: Tubiana-Rufi
  fullname: Tubiana-Rufi, Nadia
  organization: Université Paris Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, Hôpital Robert Debré, Service d’Endocrinologie-Diabétologie pédiatrique et Centre de référence des Maladies Endocriniennes Rares de la Croissance
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Isabelle
  surname: Durand-Zaleski
  fullname: Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
  organization: AP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Hôtel-Dieu, URC Economie de la Santé Ile de France, AP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Albert Chenevier- Henri Mondor, Service de Santé Publique, Inserm METHODS CRESS UMR 1153
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-02468132$$DView record in HAL
BookMark eNp9Ul1v0zAUtdAQ2wo_gBcUiRceyPBXHJsHpGoCOjGJF3i2XMfuXKVxsd1O_HtuyMbWCpAjJ7k-51zfo3OOToY4OIReEnxBiBTvMmFYsBoTVTOl2lo9QWek5U0tKGlOHn2fovOc1xhzphh_hk4ZUQRL2ZyhL4t4W5VY2dj3zpYKOtQb1wVr-qozxVRhqEy1hYopKdgKNtO_r-A3BZermABQXNoHd5ufo6fe9Nm9uHvP0PdPH79dLurrr5-vLufXtRUcl1p6Zii2VknLiVRESNoyKhgTlhJuCKOcNJwR592yY4QII3znvHVCGStJw2boatLtolnrbQobk37qaIL-XYhppU0qwfZOW78EFbFUjTecNXSJmaTGY4qxdxbcmKEPk9Z2t4S5rRtKMv2B6OHJEG70Ku61ULyFBwTeTgI3R7TF_FqHIbu00ZhyIWGuPQH4m7t-Kf7YuVz0JmTr-t4MLu6ypoxxoUQrKUBfH0HXcZcGcFaDYZhx3DbsAbUyMG8YfIRr2lFUzwWRbasYG2958RcUrM5tgoVU-QD1A8Krx778mew-OQBoJ4BNMefkvLahmBLiaFPoNcF6zKieMqoho3rMqB4tJ0fMe_H_cejEyYAdVi49ePFv0i9gmfVJ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2024_110912
Cites_doi 10.1111/dme.13594
10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.11.020
10.1111/pedi.12820
10.1186/1472-6963-12-318
10.1177/0333102413508240
10.1093/jpepsy/jsm104
10.1093/jpepsy/jsp138
10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.019
10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02867.x
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.011
10.2337/dc11-2163
10.1186/s12874-017-0438-x
10.1093/jpepsy/jsp098
10.1055/s-2002-25153
10.1177/0272989X13482045
10.1017/S0266462305050397
10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P183
10.1542/peds.2012-1450
10.1186/1471-2474-10-69
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s). 2020
COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.
The Author(s). 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s). 2020
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: The Author(s). 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7RV
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
KB0
M0S
M1P
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
1XC
VOOES
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3997-9
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Proquest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Open Access Full Text
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database


MEDLINE - Academic



PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature Open Access Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central (ProQuest)
  url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1745-6215
EndPage 7
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_cfbfeb6b95fa4352b0382af0200fec39
PMC6947947
oai_HAL_inserm_02468132v1
A618779337
31910885
10_1186_s13063_019_3997_9
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002738
– fundername: ;
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
123
2-G
29Q
2WC
53G
5VS
6PF
7RV
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEGXH
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHYZX
AIAGR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OVT
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
U2A
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
~8M
AAYXX
ALIPV
CITATION
-5E
-5G
-A0
-BR
ACRMQ
ADINQ
C24
NPM
PMFND
3V.
5GY
7XB
8FK
AHMBA
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
XSB
7X8
1XC
VOOES
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-8f3a20cc98c418916827326336c214a132415431efebd3116a6fdefce69ac8153
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1745-6215
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:21:26 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 13:46:07 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 17 06:24:36 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 19:20:43 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 09:35:26 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:02:18 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:46:29 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 23:00:29 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:00:40 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:26 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:26:44 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords time costs
investigator-led interview
patient diary
data collection
Language English
License Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c640t-8f3a20cc98c418916827326336c214a132415431efebd3116a6fdefce69ac8153
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMCID: PMC6947947
ORCID 0000-0001-5982-1522
0000-0002-9336-1395
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2730340753?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 31910885
PQID 2730340753
PQPubID 44365
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cfbfeb6b95fa4352b0382af0200fec39
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6947947
hal_primary_oai_HAL_inserm_02468132v1
proquest_miscellaneous_2334696782
proquest_journals_2730340753
gale_infotracmisc_A618779337
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A618779337
pubmed_primary_31910885
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13063_019_3997_9
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_019_3997_9
springer_journals_10_1186_s13063_019_3997_9
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-01-07
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-01-07
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-01-07
  day: 07
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine
PublicationTitleAbbrev Trials
PublicationTitleAlternate Trials
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BMC
References C-WC Lin (3997_CR3) 2009; 10
Z Jia (3997_CR13) 2019; 249
MRC Hendriks (3997_CR6) 2013; 33
J Aalders (3997_CR16) 2018; 35
A Haugstvedt (3997_CR17) 2010; 27
SS Jaser (3997_CR14) 2008; 33
M van den Brink (3997_CR12) 2005; 21
GL Heyer (3997_CR10) 2014; 34
3997_CR19
3997_CR1
H Seidl (3997_CR8) 2012; 12
SS Jaser (3997_CR18) 2010; 35
J Dunn (3997_CR5) 2015; 16
C Laidi (3997_CR2) 2018; 28
B von Niederhäusern (3997_CR7) 2017; 17
3997_CR9
M Rösch (3997_CR4) 2002; 40
KA Driscoll (3997_CR15) 2010; 35
DS Lotstein (3997_CR20) 2013; 131
DP Lubeck (3997_CR11) 2005; 58
References_xml – volume: 35
  start-page: 650
  issue: 5
  year: 2018
  ident: 3997_CR16
  publication-title: Diabet Med
  doi: 10.1111/dme.13594
– volume: 28
  start-page: 24
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 3997_CR2
  publication-title: European Neuropsychopharmacology
  doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.11.020
– ident: 3997_CR9
  doi: 10.1111/pedi.12820
– volume: 12
  start-page: 318
  year: 2012
  ident: 3997_CR8
  publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res
  doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-318
– volume: 34
  start-page: 298
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 3997_CR10
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
  doi: 10.1177/0333102413508240
– volume: 33
  start-page: 509
  issue: 5
  year: 2008
  ident: 3997_CR14
  publication-title: J Pediatr Psychol
  doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm104
– volume: 35
  start-page: 814
  issue: 8
  year: 2010
  ident: 3997_CR15
  publication-title: J Pediatr Psychol
  doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp138
– volume: 249
  start-page: 121
  year: 2019
  ident: 3997_CR13
  publication-title: J Affect Disord
  doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.019
– volume: 27
  start-page: 72
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 3997_CR17
  publication-title: Diabet Med
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02867.x
– volume: 58
  start-page: 286
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  ident: 3997_CR11
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.011
– ident: 3997_CR19
  doi: 10.2337/dc11-2163
– volume: 17
  start-page: 163
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 3997_CR7
  publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol
  doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0438-x
– volume: 35
  start-page: 738
  issue: 7
  year: 2010
  ident: 3997_CR18
  publication-title: J Pediatr Psychol
  doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp098
– volume: 40
  start-page: 217
  issue: 4
  year: 2002
  ident: 3997_CR4
  publication-title: Z Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1055/s-2002-25153
– volume: 33
  start-page: 998
  issue: 8
  year: 2013
  ident: 3997_CR6
  publication-title: Med Decis Mak
  doi: 10.1177/0272989X13482045
– ident: 3997_CR1
– volume: 21
  start-page: 298
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  ident: 3997_CR12
  publication-title: Int J Technol Assess Health Care
  doi: 10.1017/S0266462305050397
– volume: 16
  start-page: P183
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  ident: 3997_CR5
  publication-title: Trials
  doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P183
– volume: 131
  start-page: e1062
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  ident: 3997_CR20
  publication-title: Pediatrics
  doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1450
– volume: 10
  start-page: 69
  year: 2009
  ident: 3997_CR3
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-69
SSID ssj0043934
ssj0017864
Score 2.2177901
Snippet Background Non-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic...
Non-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic...
Background Non-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic...
BackgroundNon-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic...
BACKGROUND:Non-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic...
Abstract Background Non-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
hal
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 36
SubjectTerms Biomedicine
Blood glucose tests
Caregivers
Children
Clinical trials
Comparative analysis
Data collection
Diabetes
Diaries
Glucose
Glucose monitoring
Health aspects
Health care information services
Health Sciences
Human health and pathology
Insulin
investigator-led interview
Life Sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Methods
patient diary
Patient monitoring equipment
Patients
Pediatric pharmacology
Pediatrics
Statistics for Life Sciences
Time
time costs
Type 1 diabetes
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Open Access Full Text
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagB8QF8SZQkJFASKCodpw4NrcFUa2AcqJSb1bsOOpK7W7VbuHv843zgFABF46JJ85kPB5_E49nGHthVNeUtW5yb7zOS2OL3MeqygHOW1u0UqiODjgffNHLw_LjUXX0S6kvignr0wP3gtsLne-i195W6BRowQtliqYDyhFdDCod3RNWjM5Ub4Oxyqpy2MOURu9dwFLTfqW0uaL0o3a2CqVk_ZNJvn5MEZFX4ebVqMnftk7TirR_m90aoCRf9J9wh12L67vsxsGwWX6PfVpuvvPthtNQw6xxOPr5ab8vwykwlK_WvOFnY60Ongp4vOW4JPeZb875KgVEUrbS--xw_8PX98t8qJ2QB12KbW461RQiBGtCKQ0woAFOKbRSOhSybOCDYuUGeIgQbquk1I3u2tiFqG0TDMzgA7YDtuIjBo5arT2mvge8K2LwtRAhovuWksdHnTExytKFIbE41bc4ccnBMNr14ncQvyPxO5ux19MjZ31Wjb8Rv6MBmggpIXa6ATVxg5q4f6lJxl7R8DqatmAuNMPpA3wiJcByCy1NDVul6oztzigx3cKs-SUUZMbMcvEZ1LAYpw6IRxsI95tEN6MKucEsXDiMgVBwoSuVsedTM72BQt3WcXMJGqVKbYEhiow97DVuehvspcSyUGWsnunijJ15y3p1nJKGa0u1BMD-m1Frf7L1R9E__h-if8JuFvSTgv5b1btsZ3t-GZ8CyW39szRpfwDntUIP
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fb9MwELbYkBAviN8EBjISCAkULY4Tx-EFFcRUAeOJSX2zYsfZKrGmtB38-3yXOJnCxB5bO875fD5_57vcMfZKy6bKClXFVlsVZ7pMY-vzPAY4r8u0Fols6APn4-9qfpJ9WeSLcOG2DWGVg07sFHXdOrojP8Qxm0hYH7n8sP4VU9Uo8q6GEhp77KYAEqHSDcViNLhEoVUWPJlCq8Mt9DV5LUUZS0pCWk7Ooi5l_6iY984oLvIq6LwaO_mPA7U7l47usjsBUPJZLwH32A2_us9uHQeX-QP2dd7-4buW04JDuXGY-_F5753hFB7Klyte8fVQsYN3ZTzec_wkI5q3G77swiIpZ-lDdnL0-ceneRwqKMROZcku1o2s0sS5UrtMaCBBDTamSkrlUpFVsERxfgNC-MbbWgqhKtXUvnFelZXTUIaP2D7I8k8YKKqVslAAFiAv9c4WSeI8hq8phbxXEUsGXhoX0otTlYufpjMztDI9-w3Yb4j9pozY2_GRdZ9b47rOH2mBxo6UFrv7o92cmrDLjGssZqJsmUMCAS1tInVaNYDESeOdxCBvaHkNbV4Q56rwDQKmSGmwzEwJXUBjySJiB5Oe2HRu0vwaAjIhZj77ht7QG-cGuEdpMPe3wDCDCJmgHLbmUpQj9nJspjdQwNvKtxfoI2WmSiCJNGKPe4kb3watKXA45BErJrI4IWfaslqedanDVUkVBUD-u0FqL8n6L-ufXj-JZ-x2SpcQdC9VHLD93ebCPwdS29kX3Xb8C0EqOF4
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  dbid: C6C
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELZokRAXxJtAQUYCIYEi4jiZ2NyWimoFlBOVerNix1FXanerdkv_fr_JYyEUkDgmnjiTeflzxh4L8croti4qqlNvPKWFsXnqY1mmAOeNzRuV6ZY3OO9_o_lB8fmwPByKRfNemF_z98rQ-3PEWM40KptqLhxqt8TNku9xXpZ2x6CLYVUXQ9Lyj49Nhp2uOv8mBm8d8RLI6_jy-jLJ33Kl3RC0d1fcGbCjnPXKviduxOV9cWt_yI4_EF_mq0u5XknWLeKYxMw-PekTMZJXgsrFUtbydDycQ3YndnyQuOT5slydyUW3ApLLkz4UB3ufvu_O0-GwhDRQka1T0-o6z0KwJhTKAPQZAJOctKaQq6LGpBNDNdBCbKNvtFJUU9vENkSydTCIe4_ENtiKTwQ4aog8fN0Dz-Ux-CrLQkT3DVeLj5SIbJSlC0MlcT7Q4th1MwpDrhe_g_gdi9_ZRLzdPHLal9H4F_FHVtCGkCtgdzdgGG5wKBdajy8hb0sYG1Ckz7TJ6xboN2tj0OjkDavXsZ-CuVAP2w3wiVzxys1ImQrBSVeJ2JlQwr_CpPk1DGTCzHz2FdQIEScOEIcMhPtDoZvRhNwQB84ddJBpzJlLnYiXm2Z-A69tW8bVBWi0LsgCNOSJeNxb3OZtCJAK40CZiGpiixN2pi3LxVFXJZwsHx4A9t-NVvuTrb-K_ul_UT8Tt3P-_cB_pKodsb0-u4jPgdHW_kXnnVcVhDEE
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title How to collect non-medical data in a pediatric trial: diaries or interviews
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3997-9
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910885
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2730340753
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2334696782
https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-02468132
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6947947
https://doaj.org/article/cfbfeb6b95fa4352b0382af0200fec39
Volume 21
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1ta9RAEF76AuIX8d1oPVZQBCWaZJPNRhBJj9bjtEXUg_u2JJuNPWiTer368u99JpdEYqv4JeGye5vJZHbm2Z3JDGOPlSizMJaZm6tcuqFKAje3UeQCnBdJUPieKOkD54NDOZmF03k032BdeauWgWeXLu2ontRsefzix9efbzDhXzcTXsmXZ9DD5I30E1dQctFkk2037iKK5At7pwJM79rJHIeRK2HqWifnpUMMzFSTzb_X2ZtHFDJ5EY9eDKv8w7famKz96-xaizV5uhaOG2zDVjfZlYPWm36LvZvU3_mq5iQL0Hu8qiv3ZO244RQ5yhcVz_hpV8yDNxU-XnH8pPU1r5d80URMUjrT22y2v_d5PHHb4gqukaG3clUpssAzJlEm9BVAogKQCaQQ0gR-mGGRCtMOdGFLmxfC92Umy8KWxsokMwp68g7bAln2HgNFhZQ5dEMO_BdYk8eeZyyGLyi7vJUO8zpeatNmHqcCGMe6WYEoqdfs12C_JvbrxGHP-r-crtNu_KvzLr2gviNlzG4u1Msvup2A2pQ5nkTmSQThBOrMPaGCrARa9kprBAZ5Sq9Xk6SBOJO1nyfgESlDlk6lr2IoMxE7bGfQE_PRDJqfQEAGxEzS9-gNlXKiAYmkAnO_-RimEyHdib3GO_AE1tiRcNijvpnuQLFwla3P0UeIUCYAGYHD7q4lrr8bFKoPuxE5LB7I4oCcYUu1OGqyisuEig2A_Oed1P4m66-sv_8fVD5gVwPapKB9q3iHba2W5_YhkNwqH7HNeB6P2HaaTj9Ncd7dO_zwEVfHcjxqdkdwfDv3R808xnEWpL8A4a5HHA
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR1db9Mw0BqdBLwgvgkMMBITEihabCeOM2lCHWzq6IcQ2qS9mcRxWCWWlLZj4s_x23aXOpnCxN722Nqxz-fzffjOd4S8VaJIw1imfqYy6Ycq4X5mo8gH5TxPeM4CUeAD5_FEDo7CL8fR8Rr527yFwbDKhifWjDqvDN6Rb4GYDQRYH5H4OPvlY9Uo9K42JTRSV1oh36lTjLmHHUP75xxMuMXOwWfY703O9_cOPw18V2XANzIMlr4qRMoDYxJlQqZAW1IwFZdCSMNZmIK1BjIOxKwtbJYLxmQqi9wWxsokNYph1QgQAeshXqD0yPru3uTrt9aPESsZOl8qU3JrARID_aYs8QWmQU060rAuGtCKhlsnGJl5Ve29Gr35jwu3loz798k9p9LS_ooGH5A1Wz4kt8fOaf-IDAfVOV1WFEkO2Cstq9I_XfmHKAao0mlJUzpraobQupDINoWfaMbTak6ndWAmZk19TI5uBLtPSA_Ass8IQJRLmQELykDN5NZkcRAYC8PnmMTeSo8EDS61cQnOsc7GT10bOkrqFfo1oF8j-nXikfftJ7NVdo_rOu_iBrUdMTF3_Uc1_6HdOdemyGAlMksiOAOg3GaBUDwtQCkPCmsEDPIOt1cj-wDgTOpeQcASMRGX7kumYuCZIvbIRqcnHHvTad4EAukAM-iPoDdwrlMNmpdUgNzfDIZpSEg79rTQl4fJI2_aZpwBQ-5KW51BHyFCmYAuwz3ydEVx7WzAtxmIp8gjcYcWO-B0W8rpSZ28XCZY0wDA_9BQ7SVY_0X98-sX8ZrcGRyOR3p0MBm-IHc5XongLVm8QXrL-Zl9CXrjMnvlDicl32-aH1wAUOp6ag
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR1db9Mw0BpDmnhBjK8FNjASExIoamwnjoOEUGFUHd0mHpjUNy92nK0SS0rbMfHX-HXc5WsKE3vbY2vHPp_P9-E73xHyWok8DWOZ-kYZ6Ycq4b5xUeSDcp4lPGOByPGB8-GRHB-HX6fRdI38ad_CYFhlyxMrRp2VFu_IByBmAwHWRyQGeRMW8W1v9HH-08cKUuhpbctp1CQycb8vwXxbftjfg73e5Xz05fvnsd9UGPCtDIOVr3KR8sDaRNmQKdCUFEzDpRDSchamYKmBfAMR63JnMsGYTGWeudw6maRWMawYAez_bizCEMtGxNPO2GOxkmHjRWVKDpYgK9BjyhJfYALUpCcHq3IBnVC4c4YxmdcV3utxm_84byuZOHpA7jfKLB3W1LdJ1lzxkGwcNu76R2QyLi_pqqRIbMBYaVEW_nntGaIYmkpnBU3pvK0WQqsSIu8p_EQDnpYLOqtCMjFf6mNyfCu4fULWASy3RQCiTEoDzMeAgsmdNXEQWAfDZ5i-3kmPBC0utW1Sm2OFjR-6MnGU1DX6NaBfI_p14pG33SfzOq_HTZ0_4QZ1HTEld_VHuTjVzQnXNjewEmmSCKgf1FoTCMXTHNTxIHdWwCBvcHs1Mg4AzqbN-wdYIqbg0kPJVAzcUsQe2e71hANve827QCA9YMbDA-gNPOtcg84lFSD3F4NhWhLSDWNa6qtj5JFXXTPOgMF2hSsvoI8QoUxAi-EeeVpTXDcbcGwGginySNyjxR44_ZZidlalLZcJVjMA8N-1VHsF1n9R_-zmRbwkG8AF9MH-0eQ5ucfxLgSvx-Jtsr5aXLgdUBhX5kV1Mik5uW1W8BfmD3gG
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+to+collect+non-medical+data+in+a+pediatric+trial%3A+diaries+or+interviews&rft.jtitle=Trials&rft.au=Le+Jeannic%2C+Ana%C3%AFs&rft.au=Maoulida%2C+Hassani&rft.au=Guilmin-Cr%C3%A9pon%2C+Sophie&rft.au=Alberti%2C+Corinne&rft.date=2020-01-07&rft.issn=1745-6215&rft.eissn=1745-6215&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13063-019-3997-9&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1745-6215&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1745-6215&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1745-6215&client=summon