如意金黄散联合异维A酸胶囊治疗痤疮的疗效及安全性
目的:探讨如意金黄散联合异维A酸胶囊治疗痤疮的临床疗效和安全性。方法:选取2016年1月—2017年1月平煤神马医疗集团总医院门诊痤疮患者60例,按随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组30例。对照组患者口服异维A酸胶囊,观察组患者在对照组基础上联合如意金黄散外敷,治疗8周后比较两组患者的疗效、皮损评分及不良反应发生情况。结果:观察组患者的总有效率为96.67%(29/30),明显高于对照组的80.00%(24/30),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的皮损评分较治疗前明显降低,且观察组患者明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组患者不良反应发生率的差异无统计学...
Saved in:
| Published in | 中国医院用药评价与分析 Vol. 17; no. 10; pp. 1324 - 1326 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | Chinese |
| Published |
平煤神马医疗集团总医院药品调剂科,河南平顶山,467000%平煤神马医疗集团总医院中医科,河南平顶山,467000
2017
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1672-2124 |
| DOI | 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2017.10.010 |
Cover
| Summary: | 目的:探讨如意金黄散联合异维A酸胶囊治疗痤疮的临床疗效和安全性。方法:选取2016年1月—2017年1月平煤神马医疗集团总医院门诊痤疮患者60例,按随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组30例。对照组患者口服异维A酸胶囊,观察组患者在对照组基础上联合如意金黄散外敷,治疗8周后比较两组患者的疗效、皮损评分及不良反应发生情况。结果:观察组患者的总有效率为96.67%(29/30),明显高于对照组的80.00%(24/30),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的皮损评分较治疗前明显降低,且观察组患者明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组患者不良反应发生率的差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:如意金黄散联合异维A酸胶囊治疗痤疮的效果较好,可明显改善患者皮损情况,安全性高。 |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | OBJECTIVE:To probe into the clinical efficacy of safety of Ruyi Huangjin powder combined with Isotretinoin soft capsules in treatment of acne .METHODS:60 outpatients with acne in General Hospital of Pingmei Shenma Medical Group from Jan .2016-Jan.2017 were collected and divided into observation group and control group via random number table, with 30 cases in each group.The control group was given Isotretinoin soft capsules orally , while the observation group was treated with Ruyi Jinhuang powder for external use based on the control group , efficacy, scores of skin lesion and incidence of adverse drug reactions of two groups were compared after treatment of 8 weeks.RESULTS:The total effective rate of observation group (96.67%, 29/30) was significantly higher than that of the control group (80.00%, 24/30), with statistically significant difference ( P 〈0.05 ).After treatment , scores of skin lesion of both groups were significantly decreased , and that of observation group was significantly lower than the co |
| ISSN: | 1672-2124 |
| DOI: | 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2017.10.010 |