Stereotactic, Single-Dose Irradiation of Lung Tumors: A Comparison of Absolute Dose and Dose Distribution Between Pencil Beam and Monte Carlo Algorithms Based on Actual Patient CT Scans

Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose distributions of clinically applied non–intensity-modulated radiotherapy 15-MV plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy between voxel Monte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 78; no. 3; pp. 955 - 963
Main Authors Chen, Huixiao, Lohr, Frank, Fritz, Peter, Wenz, Frederik, Dobler, Barbara, Lorenz, Friedlieb, Mühlnickel, Werner
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.11.2010
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0360-3016
1879-355X
1879-355X
DOI10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012

Cover

Abstract Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose distributions of clinically applied non–intensity-modulated radiotherapy 15-MV plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy between voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) calculation and PB calculation for lung lesions. To validate XVMC, one treatment plan was verified in an inhomogeneous thorax phantom with EDR2 film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Both measured and calculated (PB and XVMC) dose distributions were compared regarding profiles and isodoses. Then, 35 lung plans originally created for clinical treatment by PB calculation with the Eclipse planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) were recalculated by XVMC (investigational implementation in PrecisePLAN [Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden]). Clinically relevant dose–volume parameters for target and lung tissue were compared and analyzed statistically. The XVMC calculation agreed well with film measurements (<1% difference in lateral profile), whereas the deviation between PB calculation and film measurements was up to +15%. On analysis of 35 clinical cases, the mean dose, minimal dose and coverage dose value for 95% volume of gross tumor volume were 1.14 ± 1.72 Gy, 1.68 ± 1.47 Gy, and 1.24 ± 1.04 Gy lower by XVMC compared with PB, respectively (prescription dose, 30 Gy). The volume covered by the 9 Gy isodose of lung was 2.73% ± 3.12% higher when calculated by XVMC compared with PB. The largest differences were observed for small lesions circumferentially encompassed by lung tissue. Pencil beam dose calculation overestimates dose to the tumor and underestimates lung volumes exposed to a given dose consistently for 15-MV photons. The degree of difference between XVMC and PB is tumor size and location dependent. Therefore XVMC calculation is helpful to further optimize treatment planning.
AbstractList Purpose Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose distributions of clinically applied non–intensity-modulated radiotherapy 15-MV plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy between voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) calculation and PB calculation for lung lesions. Methods and Materials To validate XVMC, one treatment plan was verified in an inhomogeneous thorax phantom with EDR2 film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Both measured and calculated (PB and XVMC) dose distributions were compared regarding profiles and isodoses. Then, 35 lung plans originally created for clinical treatment by PB calculation with the Eclipse planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) were recalculated by XVMC (investigational implementation in PrecisePLAN [Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden]). Clinically relevant dose–volume parameters for target and lung tissue were compared and analyzed statistically. Results The XVMC calculation agreed well with film measurements (<1% difference in lateral profile), whereas the deviation between PB calculation and film measurements was up to +15%. On analysis of 35 clinical cases, the mean dose, minimal dose and coverage dose value for 95% volume of gross tumor volume were 1.14 ± 1.72 Gy, 1.68 ± 1.47 Gy, and 1.24 ± 1.04 Gy lower by XVMC compared with PB, respectively (prescription dose, 30 Gy). The volume covered by the 9 Gy isodose of lung was 2.73% ± 3.12% higher when calculated by XVMC compared with PB. The largest differences were observed for small lesions circumferentially encompassed by lung tissue. Conclusions Pencil beam dose calculation overestimates dose to the tumor and underestimates lung volumes exposed to a given dose consistently for 15-MV photons. The degree of difference between XVMC and PB is tumor size and location dependent. Therefore XVMC calculation is helpful to further optimize treatment planning.
Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose distributions of clinically applied non–intensity-modulated radiotherapy 15-MV plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy between voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) calculation and PB calculation for lung lesions. To validate XVMC, one treatment plan was verified in an inhomogeneous thorax phantom with EDR2 film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Both measured and calculated (PB and XVMC) dose distributions were compared regarding profiles and isodoses. Then, 35 lung plans originally created for clinical treatment by PB calculation with the Eclipse planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) were recalculated by XVMC (investigational implementation in PrecisePLAN [Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden]). Clinically relevant dose–volume parameters for target and lung tissue were compared and analyzed statistically. The XVMC calculation agreed well with film measurements (<1% difference in lateral profile), whereas the deviation between PB calculation and film measurements was up to +15%. On analysis of 35 clinical cases, the mean dose, minimal dose and coverage dose value for 95% volume of gross tumor volume were 1.14 ± 1.72 Gy, 1.68 ± 1.47 Gy, and 1.24 ± 1.04 Gy lower by XVMC compared with PB, respectively (prescription dose, 30 Gy). The volume covered by the 9 Gy isodose of lung was 2.73% ± 3.12% higher when calculated by XVMC compared with PB. The largest differences were observed for small lesions circumferentially encompassed by lung tissue. Pencil beam dose calculation overestimates dose to the tumor and underestimates lung volumes exposed to a given dose consistently for 15-MV photons. The degree of difference between XVMC and PB is tumor size and location dependent. Therefore XVMC calculation is helpful to further optimize treatment planning.
Purpose: Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose distributions of clinically applied non-intensity-modulated radiotherapy 15-MV plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy between voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) calculation and PB calculation for lung lesions. Methods and Materials: To validate XVMC, one treatment plan was verified in an inhomogeneous thorax phantom with EDR2 film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Both measured and calculated (PB and XVMC) dose distributions were compared regarding profiles and isodoses. Then, 35 lung plans originally created for clinical treatment by PB calculation with the Eclipse planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) were recalculated by XVMC (investigational implementation in PrecisePLAN [Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden]). Clinically relevant dose-volume parameters for target and lung tissue were compared and analyzed statistically. Results: The XVMC calculation agreed well with film measurements (<1% difference in lateral profile), whereas the deviation between PB calculation and film measurements was up to +15%. On analysis of 35 clinical cases, the mean dose, minimal dose and coverage dose value for 95% volume of gross tumor volume were 1.14 {+-} 1.72 Gy, 1.68 {+-} 1.47 Gy, and 1.24 {+-} 1.04 Gy lower by XVMC compared with PB, respectively (prescription dose, 30 Gy). The volume covered by the 9 Gy isodose of lung was 2.73% {+-} 3.12% higher when calculated by XVMC compared with PB. The largest differences were observed for small lesions circumferentially encompassed by lung tissue. Conclusions: Pencil beam dose calculation overestimates dose to the tumor and underestimates lung volumes exposed to a given dose consistently for 15-MV photons. The degree of difference between XVMC and PB is tumor size and location dependent. Therefore XVMC calculation is helpful to further optimize treatment planning.
Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose distributions of clinically applied non-intensity-modulated radiotherapy 15-MV plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy between voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) calculation and PB calculation for lung lesions.PURPOSEDose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose distributions of clinically applied non-intensity-modulated radiotherapy 15-MV plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy between voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) calculation and PB calculation for lung lesions.To validate XVMC, one treatment plan was verified in an inhomogeneous thorax phantom with EDR2 film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Both measured and calculated (PB and XVMC) dose distributions were compared regarding profiles and isodoses. Then, 35 lung plans originally created for clinical treatment by PB calculation with the Eclipse planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) were recalculated by XVMC (investigational implementation in PrecisePLAN [Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden]). Clinically relevant dose-volume parameters for target and lung tissue were compared and analyzed statistically.METHODS AND MATERIALSTo validate XVMC, one treatment plan was verified in an inhomogeneous thorax phantom with EDR2 film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Both measured and calculated (PB and XVMC) dose distributions were compared regarding profiles and isodoses. Then, 35 lung plans originally created for clinical treatment by PB calculation with the Eclipse planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) were recalculated by XVMC (investigational implementation in PrecisePLAN [Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden]). Clinically relevant dose-volume parameters for target and lung tissue were compared and analyzed statistically.The XVMC calculation agreed well with film measurements (<1% difference in lateral profile), whereas the deviation between PB calculation and film measurements was up to +15%. On analysis of 35 clinical cases, the mean dose, minimal dose and coverage dose value for 95% volume of gross tumor volume were 1.14 ± 1.72 Gy, 1.68 ± 1.47 Gy, and 1.24 ± 1.04 Gy lower by XVMC compared with PB, respectively (prescription dose, 30 Gy). The volume covered by the 9 Gy isodose of lung was 2.73% ± 3.12% higher when calculated by XVMC compared with PB. The largest differences were observed for small lesions circumferentially encompassed by lung tissue.RESULTSThe XVMC calculation agreed well with film measurements (<1% difference in lateral profile), whereas the deviation between PB calculation and film measurements was up to +15%. On analysis of 35 clinical cases, the mean dose, minimal dose and coverage dose value for 95% volume of gross tumor volume were 1.14 ± 1.72 Gy, 1.68 ± 1.47 Gy, and 1.24 ± 1.04 Gy lower by XVMC compared with PB, respectively (prescription dose, 30 Gy). The volume covered by the 9 Gy isodose of lung was 2.73% ± 3.12% higher when calculated by XVMC compared with PB. The largest differences were observed for small lesions circumferentially encompassed by lung tissue.Pencil beam dose calculation overestimates dose to the tumor and underestimates lung volumes exposed to a given dose consistently for 15-MV photons. The degree of difference between XVMC and PB is tumor size and location dependent. Therefore XVMC calculation is helpful to further optimize treatment planning.CONCLUSIONSPencil beam dose calculation overestimates dose to the tumor and underestimates lung volumes exposed to a given dose consistently for 15-MV photons. The degree of difference between XVMC and PB is tumor size and location dependent. Therefore XVMC calculation is helpful to further optimize treatment planning.
Author Dobler, Barbara
Mühlnickel, Werner
Fritz, Peter
Chen, Huixiao
Wenz, Frederik
Lohr, Frank
Lorenz, Friedlieb
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Huixiao
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Huixiao
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Frank
  surname: Lohr
  fullname: Lohr, Frank
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Peter
  surname: Fritz
  fullname: Fritz, Peter
  organization: Department of Radiotherapy, St. Mary's Hospital Siegen, Siegen, Germany
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Frederik
  surname: Wenz
  fullname: Wenz, Frederik
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Barbara
  surname: Dobler
  fullname: Dobler, Barbara
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Friedlieb
  surname: Lorenz
  fullname: Lorenz, Friedlieb
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Werner
  surname: Mühlnickel
  fullname: Mühlnickel, Werner
  email: medizinphysik.mks@t-online.de
  organization: Department of Radiotherapy, St. Mary's Hospital Siegen, Siegen, Germany
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23309958$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20171796$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/21438028$$D View this record in Osti.gov
BookMark eNqVkm2L1DAUhYusuC_6D0QCIn6xY5K202YRYXbWl4URF2YEv4U0vZ3NmCZjkrrMT_PfmU5HBUFWP7Wlz7nJPeecJkfGGkiSxwRPCCbTl5uJ2jhbbycUYzbB1QQTei85IVXJ0qwoPh8lJzib4jSL8HFy6v0GY0xImT9IjikmJSnZ9CT5vgzgwAYhg5Iv0FKZtYb00npAV86JRomgrEG2RYverNGq76zz52iG5rbbCqf8-HNWe6v7AGivFKYZXy6VD07V_X7GBYRbAIOuwUil46fo9uQHa6JwLpy2aKbX1qlw03l0ITw0KOpmMvRCo-t4EzABzVdoKYXxD5P7rdAeHh2eZ8mnt29W8_fp4uO7q_lskcppxkLaAKVQl1mLmWBZwTLW5hVty6bJRSFFDlI2DOc1lZjRUhAmcyYqGW2ctllF8uwsKca5vdmK3a3Qmm-d6oTbcYL5EAXf8DEKPkTBccVjFFH3dNRZHxT3UgWQN9IaAzJwGgdXmFaRej5SW2e_9uAD75SXoLUwYHvPy6LIY2oER_LJgezrDppfl_iZZQSeHQDhpdCtE9Fn_5vLMsxYMRyZj5x01nsH7b_uc_6HLK60b0dwQum7xK9HMcSkvilwgyGxB9AoN_jRWPW_A6RWRsU9v8AO_Mb2zsQWcMI95Zgvh-oPzccM0-jNYN-rvw-4-_wf9xAUzA
CODEN IOBPD3
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00066_012_0144_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2011_05_054
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12094_015_1361_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2020_01_024
crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_136513
crossref_primary_10_28979_comufbed_548329
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_016_0661_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2011_10_006
crossref_primary_10_1186_1748_717X_7_20
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_014_0287_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2016_12_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2017_02_011
crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v10_i35_12822
crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v15i2_4662
crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v15i2_4685
crossref_primary_10_18466_cbayarfbe_841547
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmir_2011_09_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prro_2018_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_17705
crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v16i1_5058
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2011_10_078
crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v16i5_5397
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2011_01_019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rpor_2019_01_001
crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v17i5_6260
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prro_2012_09_003
crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v17i3_6077
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1939
10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/011
10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.10.005
10.1118/1.1788932
10.1118/1.598676
10.1088/0031-9155/52/15/006
10.1118/1.597673
10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.08.011
10.1007/s00066-004-1268-4
10.1118/1.1517291
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.062
10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/010
10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/007
10.1097/JTO.0b013e318074de34
10.1088/0031-9155/45/4/313
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.043
10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.019
10.3109/02841869509127197
10.1002/cncr.22763
10.1186/1748-717X-1-30
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.028
10.1023/B:JORA.0000010898.87146.2e
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.691
10.1118/1.1543152
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.042
10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00497-2
10.1088/0031-9155/44/12/313
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.014
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2006.05.015
10.1186/1748-717X-1-45
10.1118/1.2241992
10.1118/1.1473137
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc.
Elsevier Inc.
2015 INIST-CNRS
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2010 Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Elsevier Inc.
– notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
OTOTI
ADTOC
UNPAY
DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
OSTI.GOV
Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content
Unpaywall
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList


MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: UNPAY
  name: Unpaywall
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Access Repository
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1879-355X
EndPage 963
ExternalDocumentID oai:iris.unimore.it:11380/1172467
21438028
20171796
23309958
10_1016_j_ijrobp_2009_08_012
S0360301609029630
1_s2_0_S0360301609029630
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
– fundername: Elekta AB
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~5
29J
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
7-5
AAEDT
AAEDW
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAWTL
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABEFU
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABNEU
ABOCM
ABUDA
ABWVN
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGQPQ
AGRDE
AHHHB
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BELOY
DU5
EBS
EFKBS
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
G-2
GBLVA
HED
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HX~
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LX3
M41
MO0
NQ-
O9-
OC~
OO-
R2-
RNS
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SDG
SEL
SES
SEW
SSZ
UDS
UV1
X7M
XH2
XPP
Z5R
ZGI
~S-
ADPAM
AFCTW
EFJIC
RIG
AAIAV
AGZHU
AHPSJ
ALXNB
ZA5
AAYXX
CITATION
AGCQF
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ABPTK
OTOTI
ADTOC
UNPAY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-de22eb73f09a935939f482f7dd4a5ca4eccd904b2c0927a19c49a8c1876f38143
IEDL.DBID UNPAY
ISSN 0360-3016
1879-355X
IngestDate Sun Oct 26 03:17:15 EDT 2025
Thu May 18 18:39:20 EDT 2023
Sat Sep 27 21:58:30 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:01:56 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:13:57 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:12:51 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 03:16:11 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:20:10 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:18:55 EST 2025
Tue Oct 14 19:27:34 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)
Pencil beam
Monte Carlo
Lung tumor
Dose repartition
Human
Lung disease
Radiodiagnosis
Respiratory disease
Lung cancer
Radiosurgery
Stereotaxia
Malignant tumor
Radiotherapy
Algorithm
Treatment
Irradiation
Medical imagery
Bronchus disease
Computerized axial tomography
Treatment planning
Comparative study
Cancer
Test object
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
CC BY 4.0
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
cc-by
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c639t-de22eb73f09a935939f482f7dd4a5ca4eccd904b2c0927a19c49a8c1876f38143
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/11380/1172467
PMID 20171796
PQID 755401110
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs unpaywall_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2009_08_012
osti_scitechconnect_21438028
proquest_miscellaneous_755401110
pubmed_primary_20171796
pascalfrancis_primary_23309958
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2009_08_012
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2009_08_012
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2009_08_012
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0360301609029630
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2009_08_012
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2010-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2010
  text: 2010-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace New York, NY
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York, NY
– name: United States
PublicationTitle International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
PublicationTitleAlternate Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
– name: Elsevier
References Nyman, Johansson, Hulten (bib5) 2006; 51
Kawrakow, Fippel, Friedrich (bib25) 1996; 23
Jang, Liu, Mohan (bib30) 2008; 71
Wang, Yorke, Chui (bib20) 2002; 29
Lax, Bromgren, Larson, Näslund (bib2) 1998; 1
Fippel (bib22) 1999; 26
Baumann, Nyman, Hoyer (bib3) 2008; 88
Yang, Li, Chen (bib21) 2005; 50
Fritz, Kraus, Blaschke (bib33) 2008; 60
Guckenberger, Wulf, Mueller (bib9) 2009; 74
Carrasco, Jornet, Duch (bib14) 2004; 31
Liu (bib31) 2002; 29
2009. In press.
Haedinger, Krieger, Flentje, Wulf (bib16) 2005; 61
Takeda, Sanuki, Kunieda (bib11) 2009; 73
(bib24) 2004
Koelbl, Krieger, Haedinger, Sauer, Flentje (bib15) 2004; 180
Depuydt, Van Esch, Huyskens (bib29) 2002; 62
Fippel, Haryanto, Dohm, Nusslin, Kriesen (bib27) 2003; 30
Fritz, Kraus, Muehlnickel (bib7) 2006; 1
Dobler, Walter, Knopf (bib12) 2006; 1
Sikora, Dohm, Alber (bib28) 2007; 52
Siebers, Keall, Nahum, Mohan (bib32) 2000; 45
Hof, Muenter, Oetzel (bib4) 2007; 110
Vanderstraeten, Reynaert, Paelinck (bib18) 2006; 33
Krieger, Sauer (bib17) 2005; 50
Fippel, Laub, Huber, Nusslin (bib26) 1999; 44
McCammon, Schefter, Gaspar (bib10) 2009; 73
Fowler, Tome, Fenwick, Mehta (bib8) 2004; 60
Fakiris AJ, McGarry RC, Yiannoutsos CT, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non–small-cell lung carcinoma: Four-year results of a prospective Phase II study. Int J
Reynaert, Van der Mark, Schaart (bib13) 2007; 76
Blomgren, Lax, Naslund, Svanstrom (bib1) 1995; 34
Onishi, Shirato, Nagata (bib6) 2007; 2
Seco, Adams, Bidmead, Partridge, Verhaegen (bib19) 2005; 50
Wang (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib20) 2002; 29
Sikora (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib28) 2007; 52
Fippel (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib22) 1999; 26
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib23
Koelbl (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib15) 2004; 180
Onishi (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib6) 2007; 2
Depuydt (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib29) 2002; 62
Fritz (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib33) 2008; 60
Fippel (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib27) 2003; 30
Blomgren (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib1) 1995; 34
Takeda (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib11) 2009; 73
Siebers (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib32) 2000; 45
Fritz (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib7) 2006; 1
Dobler (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib12) 2006; 1
Yang (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib21) 2005; 50
Haedinger (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib16) 2005; 61
Carrasco (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib14) 2004; 31
Hof (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib4) 2007; 110
Fowler (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib8) 2004; 60
Fippel (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib26) 1999; 44
Vanderstraeten (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib18) 2006; 33
Nyman (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib5) 2006; 51
Reynaert (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib13) 2007; 76
Guckenberger (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib9) 2009; 74
Lax (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib2) 1998; 1
Kawrakow (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib25) 1996; 23
Krieger (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib17) 2005; 50
Seco (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib19) 2005; 50
Baumann (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib3) 2008; 88
McCammon (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib10) 2009; 73
Liu (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib31) 2002; 29
(10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib24) 2004
Jang (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib30) 2008; 71
References_xml – volume: 73
  start-page: 442
  year: 2009
  end-page: 448
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary lung cancer at a dose of 50 Gy total in five fractions to the periphery of the planning target volume calculated using a superposition algorithm
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
– volume: 71
  start-page: 1537
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1546
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Underestimation of low-dose radiation in the treatment of intensity-modulated radiotherapy
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
– volume: 23
  start-page: 445
  year: 1996
  end-page: 457
  ident: bib25
  article-title: 3D electron dose calculation using a Voxel based Monte Carlo algorithm (VMC)
  publication-title: Med Phys
– volume: 44
  start-page: 3039
  year: 1999
  end-page: 3054
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Experimental investigation of a fast Monte Carlo photon beam dose calculation algorithm
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
– volume: 52
  start-page: 4449
  year: 2007
  end-page: 4463
  ident: bib28
  article-title: A virtual photon source model of an Elekta linear accelerator with integrated mini MLC for Monte Carlo based IMRT dose calculation
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
– volume: 51
  start-page: 97
  year: 2006
  end-page: 103
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer—Mature results for medically inoperable patients
  publication-title: Lung Cancer
– volume: 1
  start-page: 30
  year: 2006
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Stereotactic, single-dose irradiation of stage I non-small cell lung cancer and lung metastases
  publication-title: Radiat Oncol
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1466
  year: 1999
  end-page: 1475
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for photon beams based on the VMC electron algorithm
  publication-title: Med Phys
– volume: 76
  start-page: 643
  year: 2007
  end-page: 686
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Monte Carlo treatment planning for photon and electron beams
  publication-title: Radiat Phys Chem
– volume: 30
  start-page: 301
  year: 2003
  end-page: 311
  ident: bib27
  article-title: A virtual photon energy fluence model for Monte Carlo dose calculation
  publication-title: Med Phys
– volume: 1
  start-page: 45
  year: 2006
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Optimization of extracranial stereotactic radiation therapy of small lung lesions using accurate dose calculation algorithms
  publication-title: Radiat Oncol
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1241
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1256
  ident: bib8
  article-title: A challenge to traditional radiation oncology
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
– volume: 73
  start-page: 112
  year: 2009
  end-page: 118
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Observation of a dose–control relationship for lung and liver tumors after stereotactic body radiation therapy
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
– volume: 180
  start-page: 783
  year: 2004
  end-page: 788
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Influence of calculation algorithm on dose distribution in irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collapsed cone versus pencil beam
  publication-title: Strahlenther Onkol
– volume: 29
  start-page: 922
  year: 2002
  end-page: 923
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Dm rather than Dw should be used in Monte Carlo treatment planning. For the proposition
  publication-title: Med Phys
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2705
  year: 2002
  end-page: 2717
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments
  publication-title: Med Phys
– volume: 74
  start-page: 47
  year: 2009
  end-page: 54
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Dose–response relationship for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of pulmonary tumors: Relevance of 4D dose calculation
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
– volume: 1
  start-page: 135
  year: 1998
  end-page: 148
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Extracranial stereotactic radiosurgery of localized targets
  publication-title: J Radiosurgery
– volume: 50
  start-page: 869
  year: 2005
  end-page: 878
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
– volume: 60
  start-page: 193
  year: 2008
  end-page: 199
  ident: bib33
  article-title: Stereotactic, high single-dose irradiation of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using 4-dimensional CT scans for treatment planning
  publication-title: Lung Cancer
– volume: 50
  start-page: 817
  year: 2005
  end-page: 830
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
– volume: 62
  start-page: 309
  year: 2002
  end-page: 319
  ident: bib29
  article-title: A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: Refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
– volume: 50
  start-page: 859
  year: 2005
  end-page: 868
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
– reference: 2009. In press.
– year: 2004
  ident: bib24
  article-title: AAPM Report No. 85
– reference: Fakiris AJ, McGarry RC, Yiannoutsos CT, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non–small-cell lung carcinoma: Four-year results of a prospective Phase II study. Int J
– volume: 88
  start-page: 359
  year: 2008
  end-page: 367
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for medically inoperable patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer—A first report of toxicity related to COPD/CVD in a non-randomized prospective phase II study
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
– volume: 34
  start-page: 861
  year: 1995
  end-page: 870
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Stereotactic high dose fraction radiation therapy of extracranial tumors using an accelerator. Clinical experience of the first thirty-one patients
  publication-title: Acta Oncol
– volume: 2
  start-page: S94
  year: 2007
  end-page: S100
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HypoFXSRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: Updated results of 257 patients in a Japanese multi-institutional study
  publication-title: J Thorac Oncol
– volume: 61
  start-page: 239
  year: 2005
  end-page: 249
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Influence of calculation model on dose distribution in stereotactic radiotherapy for pulmonary targets
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
– volume: 110
  start-page: 148
  year: 2007
  end-page: 155
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Stereotactic single-dose radiotherapy (radiosurgery) of early stage nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 31
  start-page: 2899
  year: 2004
  end-page: 2911
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium
  publication-title: Med Phys
– volume: 33
  start-page: 3149
  year: 2006
  end-page: 3158
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations
  publication-title: Med Phys
– volume: 45
  start-page: 983
  year: 2000
  end-page: 995
  ident: bib32
  article-title: Converting absorbed dose to medium to absorbed dose to water for Monte Carlo based photon beam dose calculations
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
– volume: 74
  start-page: 47
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib9
  article-title: Dose–response relationship for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of pulmonary tumors: Relevance of 4D dose calculation
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1939
– volume: 50
  start-page: 869
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib21
  article-title: Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
  doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/011
– volume: 60
  start-page: 193
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib33
  article-title: Stereotactic, high single-dose irradiation of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using 4-dimensional CT scans for treatment planning
  publication-title: Lung Cancer
  doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.10.005
– volume: 31
  start-page: 2899
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib14
  article-title: Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium
  publication-title: Med Phys
  doi: 10.1118/1.1788932
– year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib24
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1466
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib22
  article-title: Fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for photon beams based on the VMC electron algorithm
  publication-title: Med Phys
  doi: 10.1118/1.598676
– volume: 52
  start-page: 4449
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib28
  article-title: A virtual photon source model of an Elekta linear accelerator with integrated mini MLC for Monte Carlo based IMRT dose calculation
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
  doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/15/006
– volume: 23
  start-page: 445
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib25
  article-title: 3D electron dose calculation using a Voxel based Monte Carlo algorithm (VMC)
  publication-title: Med Phys
  doi: 10.1118/1.597673
– volume: 51
  start-page: 97
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib5
  article-title: Stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer—Mature results for medically inoperable patients
  publication-title: Lung Cancer
  doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.08.011
– volume: 180
  start-page: 783
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib15
  article-title: Influence of calculation algorithm on dose distribution in irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collapsed cone versus pencil beam
  publication-title: Strahlenther Onkol
  doi: 10.1007/s00066-004-1268-4
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2705
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib20
  article-title: Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments
  publication-title: Med Phys
  doi: 10.1118/1.1517291
– volume: 73
  start-page: 112
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib10
  article-title: Observation of a dose–control relationship for lung and liver tumors after stereotactic body radiation therapy
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.062
– volume: 50
  start-page: 859
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib17
  article-title: Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
  doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/010
– volume: 50
  start-page: 817
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib19
  article-title: Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
  doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/007
– volume: 2
  start-page: S94
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib6
  article-title: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HypoFXSRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: Updated results of 257 patients in a Japanese multi-institutional study
  publication-title: J Thorac Oncol
  doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318074de34
– volume: 45
  start-page: 983
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib32
  article-title: Converting absorbed dose to medium to absorbed dose to water for Monte Carlo based photon beam dose calculations
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
  doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/4/313
– volume: 73
  start-page: 442
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib11
  article-title: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary lung cancer at a dose of 50 Gy total in five fractions to the periphery of the planning target volume calculated using a superposition algorithm
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.043
– volume: 88
  start-page: 359
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib3
  article-title: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for medically inoperable patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer—A first report of toxicity related to COPD/CVD in a non-randomized prospective phase II study
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.019
– volume: 34
  start-page: 861
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib1
  article-title: Stereotactic high dose fraction radiation therapy of extracranial tumors using an accelerator. Clinical experience of the first thirty-one patients
  publication-title: Acta Oncol
  doi: 10.3109/02841869509127197
– volume: 110
  start-page: 148
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib4
  article-title: Stereotactic single-dose radiotherapy (radiosurgery) of early stage nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.22763
– volume: 1
  start-page: 30
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib7
  article-title: Stereotactic, single-dose irradiation of stage I non-small cell lung cancer and lung metastases
  publication-title: Radiat Oncol
  doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-1-30
– volume: 61
  start-page: 239
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib16
  article-title: Influence of calculation model on dose distribution in stereotactic radiotherapy for pulmonary targets
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.028
– volume: 1
  start-page: 135
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib2
  article-title: Extracranial stereotactic radiosurgery of localized targets
  publication-title: J Radiosurgery
  doi: 10.1023/B:JORA.0000010898.87146.2e
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1241
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib8
  article-title: A challenge to traditional radiation oncology
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.691
– volume: 30
  start-page: 301
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib27
  article-title: A virtual photon energy fluence model for Monte Carlo dose calculation
  publication-title: Med Phys
  doi: 10.1118/1.1543152
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib23
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.042
– volume: 62
  start-page: 309
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib29
  article-title: A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: Refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00497-2
– volume: 44
  start-page: 3039
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib26
  article-title: Experimental investigation of a fast Monte Carlo photon beam dose calculation algorithm
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
  doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/12/313
– volume: 71
  start-page: 1537
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib30
  article-title: Underestimation of low-dose radiation in the treatment of intensity-modulated radiotherapy
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.014
– volume: 76
  start-page: 643
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib13
  article-title: Monte Carlo treatment planning for photon and electron beams
  publication-title: Radiat Phys Chem
  doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2006.05.015
– volume: 1
  start-page: 45
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib12
  article-title: Optimization of extracranial stereotactic radiation therapy of small lung lesions using accurate dose calculation algorithms
  publication-title: Radiat Oncol
  doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-1-45
– volume: 33
  start-page: 3149
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib18
  article-title: Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations
  publication-title: Med Phys
  doi: 10.1118/1.2241992
– volume: 29
  start-page: 922
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib31
  article-title: Dm rather than Dw should be used in Monte Carlo treatment planning. For the proposition
  publication-title: Med Phys
  doi: 10.1118/1.1473137
SSID ssj0001174
Score 2.1579945
Snippet Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose...
Purpose Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to...
Purpose: Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to...
SourceID unpaywall
osti
proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 955
SubjectTerms ALGORITHMS
Biological and medical sciences
BODY
CALCULATION METHODS
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery
CAT SCANNING
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES
DISEASES
Diseases of the respiratory system
DOSES
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Lung - anatomy & histology
Lung - diagnostic imaging
Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Lung Neoplasms - pathology
Lung Neoplasms - surgery
Lung tumor
LUNGS
MATHEMATICAL LOGIC
Medical sciences
MEDICINE
Monte Carlo
MONTE CARLO METHOD
NEOPLASMS
NUCLEAR MEDICINE
ORGANS
Pencil beam
Phantoms, Imaging
PLANNING
Pneumology
RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS
RADIATION DOSES
Radiography
RADIOLOGY
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Radiometry - methods
Radiosurgery - instrumentation
Radiosurgery - methods
RADIOTHERAPY
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)
THERAPY
TOMOGRAPHY
Tumor Burden
Tumors of the respiratory system and mediastinum
Title Stereotactic, Single-Dose Irradiation of Lung Tumors: A Comparison of Absolute Dose and Dose Distribution Between Pencil Beam and Monte Carlo Algorithms Based on Actual Patient CT Scans
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0360301609029630
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0360301609029630
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20171796
https://www.proquest.com/docview/755401110
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/21438028
http://hdl.handle.net/11380/1172467
UnpaywallVersion submittedVersion
Volume 78
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVLSH
  databaseName: Elsevier Journals
  customDbUrl:
  mediaType: online
  eissn: 1879-355X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0001174
  issn: 1879-355X
  databaseCode: AKRWK
  dateStart: 19761001
  isFulltext: true
  providerName: Library Specific Holdings
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3LbtNAFB2VROKx4FkgUKJZsMSRPeMnOzehKpRWEUlEWI3G9hhSHLuyHSH4M_6Oez12KFBo2USJPEfx476sufccQp5Dvea7MbcN1wvgBcXmypBBYhsplxaPlEJGc-y2OHEPF_abpbPcIZ3g3W_0ApbFfRM-PQb-fI30XQcK7h7pL06m4Qe9CwlRxGwETlE224DsuewG5JourtVpWUQdL6U_Mi32twTUK8CnsDVSVnB3Ui1rcVHdeYvc2ORn8usXmWXnctHBHTLpJnp0C8rn0aaORvG3Pwke_3WZd8ntthaloTaee2RH5ffJ9eN2t_0B-T6Dm66KupmjekFnkOUyZUyKStHXZYmkBvhUaZHStxAy6HyzLsrqJQ3peCtuiAfDqLFvRRsknI_-MkHK3lZti-7rdjE6BadZZfBTrpuVx0ieRceyzAoaZh-LclV_Wld0H3JvQgEXNvMvdKrZYel4TmdgK9UuWRy8mo8PjVbqwYihRKqNRDGmIo-nZiBxVpgHqe2z1EsSWzqxtMHQksC0IxabAfOkFcR2IP0YnrmbQs1h84eklxe5ekyo9FNAOqmburAocaWVRDaPXDC7gCeSDQjvnr-IWx50lOPIRNfwdiq01aBEZyBQpdMClLFFnWkekEvWO51piW7GFaKygER1Cc67CKeqNrRUwhIVE6aYoe2j6WNjLURR8zyyrZ50VXSF_9xD20cUEgfH2GEFMGahGgHzB2T4i09sr59xDu8XDiygnZMICE644yRzVWwq4UGxCgnEgpN7pJ3nJxiJmrzAHZDR1puudGef_C_gKbnZtHw0A6R7pFeXG_UMKsk6GpJ-ePTu_dGwjSg_AAxnb_U
linkProvider Unpaywall
linkToUnpaywall http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Jb9NAFB6VVGI5sC-BUs2BI47smfEy3NyEqiBaRUoihdNobI9LimNXtiME_4x_x3teQoFCyyVK5PkUL2-z5r3vI-QV1GuBF3Nheb6EFxTBjaVlIqyUa4dHxiCjOXZbnHhHC_F-6S53SC949xu9gOPwwIZPn4E_3yC7ngsF94DsLk6m4cd2FxKiiN0InKJstgXZc9kPyDVdXKuzsoh6XspgZDvsbwloUIBPYWukruDupK2sxWV15x1ya5Of669fdJZdyEWH98ikn-hpW1A-jzZ1NIq__Unw-K_LvE_udrUoDVvjeUB2TP6Q3Dzudtsfke8zuOmmqJs5qtd0BlkuM9akqAx9V5ZIaoBPlRYp_QAhg84366Ks3tCQjrfihngwjBr7NrRBwvm0XyZI2dupbdGDtl2MTsFpVhn81Otm5TGSZ9GxLrOChtlpUa7qT-uKHkDuTSjgwmb-hU5bdlg6ntMZ2Er1mCwO387HR1Yn9WDFUCLVVmIYM5HPU1tqnBXmMhUBS_0kEdqNtQBDS6QtIhbbkvnakbGQOojhmXsp1ByCPyGDvMjNM0J1kALSTb3Ug0WJp50kEjzywOwkTzQbEt4_fxV3POgox5GpvuHtTLVWgxKdUqFKpwMoa4s6b3lArljv9qal-hlXiMoKEtUVOP8ynKm60FIpR1VM2WqGto-mj421EEXti8iuemqromv85x7aPqKQODjGDiuAMQfVCFgwJPu_-MT2-hnn8H7hwgLaO4mC4IQ7Tjo3xaZSPhSrkEAcOLmnrfP8BCNRky-9IRltvelad_b5_wJekNtNy0czQLpHBnW5MS-hkqyj_S6S_ACUlW5S
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stereotactic%2C+Single-Dose+Irradiation+of+Lung+Tumors%3A+A+Comparison+of+Absolute+Dose+and+Dose+Distribution+Between+Pencil+Beam+and+Monte+Carlo+Algorithms+Based+on+Actual+Patient+CT+Scans&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+radiation+oncology%2C+biology%2C+physics&rft.au=Chen+Huixiao&rft.au=Lohr%2C+Frank&rft.au=Fritz%2C+Peter&rft.au=Wenz%2C+Frederik&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijrobp.2009.08.012&rft.externalDocID=21438028
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F03603016%2FS0360301610X00141%2Fcov150h.gif