Stereotactic, Single-Dose Irradiation of Lung Tumors: A Comparison of Absolute Dose and Dose Distribution Between Pencil Beam and Monte Carlo Algorithms Based on Actual Patient CT Scans
Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose distributions of clinically applied non–intensity-modulated radiotherapy 15-MV plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy between voxel Monte...
Saved in:
| Published in | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 78; no. 3; pp. 955 - 963 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01.11.2010
Elsevier |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0360-3016 1879-355X 1879-355X |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012 |
Cover
| Abstract | Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose distributions of clinically applied non–intensity-modulated radiotherapy 15-MV plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy between voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) calculation and PB calculation for lung lesions.
To validate XVMC, one treatment plan was verified in an inhomogeneous thorax phantom with EDR2 film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Both measured and calculated (PB and XVMC) dose distributions were compared regarding profiles and isodoses. Then, 35 lung plans originally created for clinical treatment by PB calculation with the Eclipse planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) were recalculated by XVMC (investigational implementation in PrecisePLAN [Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden]). Clinically relevant dose–volume parameters for target and lung tissue were compared and analyzed statistically.
The XVMC calculation agreed well with film measurements (<1% difference in lateral profile), whereas the deviation between PB calculation and film measurements was up to +15%. On analysis of 35 clinical cases, the mean dose, minimal dose and coverage dose value for 95% volume of gross tumor volume were 1.14 ± 1.72 Gy, 1.68 ± 1.47 Gy, and 1.24 ± 1.04 Gy lower by XVMC compared with PB, respectively (prescription dose, 30 Gy). The volume covered by the 9 Gy isodose of lung was 2.73% ± 3.12% higher when calculated by XVMC compared with PB. The largest differences were observed for small lesions circumferentially encompassed by lung tissue.
Pencil beam dose calculation overestimates dose to the tumor and underestimates lung volumes exposed to a given dose consistently for 15-MV photons. The degree of difference between XVMC and PB is tumor size and location dependent. Therefore XVMC calculation is helpful to further optimize treatment planning. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Purpose Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose distributions of clinically applied non–intensity-modulated radiotherapy 15-MV plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy between voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) calculation and PB calculation for lung lesions. Methods and Materials To validate XVMC, one treatment plan was verified in an inhomogeneous thorax phantom with EDR2 film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Both measured and calculated (PB and XVMC) dose distributions were compared regarding profiles and isodoses. Then, 35 lung plans originally created for clinical treatment by PB calculation with the Eclipse planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) were recalculated by XVMC (investigational implementation in PrecisePLAN [Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden]). Clinically relevant dose–volume parameters for target and lung tissue were compared and analyzed statistically. Results The XVMC calculation agreed well with film measurements (<1% difference in lateral profile), whereas the deviation between PB calculation and film measurements was up to +15%. On analysis of 35 clinical cases, the mean dose, minimal dose and coverage dose value for 95% volume of gross tumor volume were 1.14 ± 1.72 Gy, 1.68 ± 1.47 Gy, and 1.24 ± 1.04 Gy lower by XVMC compared with PB, respectively (prescription dose, 30 Gy). The volume covered by the 9 Gy isodose of lung was 2.73% ± 3.12% higher when calculated by XVMC compared with PB. The largest differences were observed for small lesions circumferentially encompassed by lung tissue. Conclusions Pencil beam dose calculation overestimates dose to the tumor and underestimates lung volumes exposed to a given dose consistently for 15-MV photons. The degree of difference between XVMC and PB is tumor size and location dependent. Therefore XVMC calculation is helpful to further optimize treatment planning. Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose distributions of clinically applied non–intensity-modulated radiotherapy 15-MV plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy between voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) calculation and PB calculation for lung lesions. To validate XVMC, one treatment plan was verified in an inhomogeneous thorax phantom with EDR2 film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Both measured and calculated (PB and XVMC) dose distributions were compared regarding profiles and isodoses. Then, 35 lung plans originally created for clinical treatment by PB calculation with the Eclipse planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) were recalculated by XVMC (investigational implementation in PrecisePLAN [Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden]). Clinically relevant dose–volume parameters for target and lung tissue were compared and analyzed statistically. The XVMC calculation agreed well with film measurements (<1% difference in lateral profile), whereas the deviation between PB calculation and film measurements was up to +15%. On analysis of 35 clinical cases, the mean dose, minimal dose and coverage dose value for 95% volume of gross tumor volume were 1.14 ± 1.72 Gy, 1.68 ± 1.47 Gy, and 1.24 ± 1.04 Gy lower by XVMC compared with PB, respectively (prescription dose, 30 Gy). The volume covered by the 9 Gy isodose of lung was 2.73% ± 3.12% higher when calculated by XVMC compared with PB. The largest differences were observed for small lesions circumferentially encompassed by lung tissue. Pencil beam dose calculation overestimates dose to the tumor and underestimates lung volumes exposed to a given dose consistently for 15-MV photons. The degree of difference between XVMC and PB is tumor size and location dependent. Therefore XVMC calculation is helpful to further optimize treatment planning. Purpose: Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose distributions of clinically applied non-intensity-modulated radiotherapy 15-MV plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy between voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) calculation and PB calculation for lung lesions. Methods and Materials: To validate XVMC, one treatment plan was verified in an inhomogeneous thorax phantom with EDR2 film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Both measured and calculated (PB and XVMC) dose distributions were compared regarding profiles and isodoses. Then, 35 lung plans originally created for clinical treatment by PB calculation with the Eclipse planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) were recalculated by XVMC (investigational implementation in PrecisePLAN [Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden]). Clinically relevant dose-volume parameters for target and lung tissue were compared and analyzed statistically. Results: The XVMC calculation agreed well with film measurements (<1% difference in lateral profile), whereas the deviation between PB calculation and film measurements was up to +15%. On analysis of 35 clinical cases, the mean dose, minimal dose and coverage dose value for 95% volume of gross tumor volume were 1.14 {+-} 1.72 Gy, 1.68 {+-} 1.47 Gy, and 1.24 {+-} 1.04 Gy lower by XVMC compared with PB, respectively (prescription dose, 30 Gy). The volume covered by the 9 Gy isodose of lung was 2.73% {+-} 3.12% higher when calculated by XVMC compared with PB. The largest differences were observed for small lesions circumferentially encompassed by lung tissue. Conclusions: Pencil beam dose calculation overestimates dose to the tumor and underestimates lung volumes exposed to a given dose consistently for 15-MV photons. The degree of difference between XVMC and PB is tumor size and location dependent. Therefore XVMC calculation is helpful to further optimize treatment planning. Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose distributions of clinically applied non-intensity-modulated radiotherapy 15-MV plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy between voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) calculation and PB calculation for lung lesions.PURPOSEDose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose distributions of clinically applied non-intensity-modulated radiotherapy 15-MV plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy between voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) calculation and PB calculation for lung lesions.To validate XVMC, one treatment plan was verified in an inhomogeneous thorax phantom with EDR2 film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Both measured and calculated (PB and XVMC) dose distributions were compared regarding profiles and isodoses. Then, 35 lung plans originally created for clinical treatment by PB calculation with the Eclipse planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) were recalculated by XVMC (investigational implementation in PrecisePLAN [Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden]). Clinically relevant dose-volume parameters for target and lung tissue were compared and analyzed statistically.METHODS AND MATERIALSTo validate XVMC, one treatment plan was verified in an inhomogeneous thorax phantom with EDR2 film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Both measured and calculated (PB and XVMC) dose distributions were compared regarding profiles and isodoses. Then, 35 lung plans originally created for clinical treatment by PB calculation with the Eclipse planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) were recalculated by XVMC (investigational implementation in PrecisePLAN [Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden]). Clinically relevant dose-volume parameters for target and lung tissue were compared and analyzed statistically.The XVMC calculation agreed well with film measurements (<1% difference in lateral profile), whereas the deviation between PB calculation and film measurements was up to +15%. On analysis of 35 clinical cases, the mean dose, minimal dose and coverage dose value for 95% volume of gross tumor volume were 1.14 ± 1.72 Gy, 1.68 ± 1.47 Gy, and 1.24 ± 1.04 Gy lower by XVMC compared with PB, respectively (prescription dose, 30 Gy). The volume covered by the 9 Gy isodose of lung was 2.73% ± 3.12% higher when calculated by XVMC compared with PB. The largest differences were observed for small lesions circumferentially encompassed by lung tissue.RESULTSThe XVMC calculation agreed well with film measurements (<1% difference in lateral profile), whereas the deviation between PB calculation and film measurements was up to +15%. On analysis of 35 clinical cases, the mean dose, minimal dose and coverage dose value for 95% volume of gross tumor volume were 1.14 ± 1.72 Gy, 1.68 ± 1.47 Gy, and 1.24 ± 1.04 Gy lower by XVMC compared with PB, respectively (prescription dose, 30 Gy). The volume covered by the 9 Gy isodose of lung was 2.73% ± 3.12% higher when calculated by XVMC compared with PB. The largest differences were observed for small lesions circumferentially encompassed by lung tissue.Pencil beam dose calculation overestimates dose to the tumor and underestimates lung volumes exposed to a given dose consistently for 15-MV photons. The degree of difference between XVMC and PB is tumor size and location dependent. Therefore XVMC calculation is helpful to further optimize treatment planning.CONCLUSIONSPencil beam dose calculation overestimates dose to the tumor and underestimates lung volumes exposed to a given dose consistently for 15-MV photons. The degree of difference between XVMC and PB is tumor size and location dependent. Therefore XVMC calculation is helpful to further optimize treatment planning. |
| Author | Dobler, Barbara Mühlnickel, Werner Fritz, Peter Chen, Huixiao Wenz, Frederik Lohr, Frank Lorenz, Friedlieb |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Huixiao surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Huixiao organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Frank surname: Lohr fullname: Lohr, Frank organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany – sequence: 3 givenname: Peter surname: Fritz fullname: Fritz, Peter organization: Department of Radiotherapy, St. Mary's Hospital Siegen, Siegen, Germany – sequence: 4 givenname: Frederik surname: Wenz fullname: Wenz, Frederik organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany – sequence: 5 givenname: Barbara surname: Dobler fullname: Dobler, Barbara organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany – sequence: 6 givenname: Friedlieb surname: Lorenz fullname: Lorenz, Friedlieb organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany – sequence: 7 givenname: Werner surname: Mühlnickel fullname: Mühlnickel, Werner email: medizinphysik.mks@t-online.de organization: Department of Radiotherapy, St. Mary's Hospital Siegen, Siegen, Germany |
| BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23309958$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20171796$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.osti.gov/biblio/21438028$$D View this record in Osti.gov |
| BookMark | eNqVkm2L1DAUhYusuC_6D0QCIn6xY5K202YRYXbWl4URF2YEv4U0vZ3NmCZjkrrMT_PfmU5HBUFWP7Wlz7nJPeecJkfGGkiSxwRPCCbTl5uJ2jhbbycUYzbB1QQTei85IVXJ0qwoPh8lJzib4jSL8HFy6v0GY0xImT9IjikmJSnZ9CT5vgzgwAYhg5Iv0FKZtYb00npAV86JRomgrEG2RYverNGq76zz52iG5rbbCqf8-HNWe6v7AGivFKYZXy6VD07V_X7GBYRbAIOuwUil46fo9uQHa6JwLpy2aKbX1qlw03l0ITw0KOpmMvRCo-t4EzABzVdoKYXxD5P7rdAeHh2eZ8mnt29W8_fp4uO7q_lskcppxkLaAKVQl1mLmWBZwTLW5hVty6bJRSFFDlI2DOc1lZjRUhAmcyYqGW2ctllF8uwsKca5vdmK3a3Qmm-d6oTbcYL5EAXf8DEKPkTBccVjFFH3dNRZHxT3UgWQN9IaAzJwGgdXmFaRej5SW2e_9uAD75SXoLUwYHvPy6LIY2oER_LJgezrDppfl_iZZQSeHQDhpdCtE9Fn_5vLMsxYMRyZj5x01nsH7b_uc_6HLK60b0dwQum7xK9HMcSkvilwgyGxB9AoN_jRWPW_A6RWRsU9v8AO_Mb2zsQWcMI95Zgvh-oPzccM0-jNYN-rvw-4-_wf9xAUzA |
| CODEN | IOBPD3 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00066_012_0144_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2011_05_054 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12094_015_1361_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2020_01_024 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_136513 crossref_primary_10_28979_comufbed_548329 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_016_0661_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2011_10_006 crossref_primary_10_1186_1748_717X_7_20 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_014_0287_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2016_12_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2017_02_011 crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v10_i35_12822 crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v15i2_4662 crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v15i2_4685 crossref_primary_10_18466_cbayarfbe_841547 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmir_2011_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prro_2018_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_17705 crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v16i1_5058 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2011_10_078 crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v16i5_5397 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2011_01_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rpor_2019_01_001 crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v17i5_6260 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prro_2012_09_003 crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v17i3_6077 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1939 10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/011 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.10.005 10.1118/1.1788932 10.1118/1.598676 10.1088/0031-9155/52/15/006 10.1118/1.597673 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.08.011 10.1007/s00066-004-1268-4 10.1118/1.1517291 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.062 10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/010 10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/007 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318074de34 10.1088/0031-9155/45/4/313 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.043 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.019 10.3109/02841869509127197 10.1002/cncr.22763 10.1186/1748-717X-1-30 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.028 10.1023/B:JORA.0000010898.87146.2e 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.691 10.1118/1.1543152 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.042 10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00497-2 10.1088/0031-9155/44/12/313 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.014 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2006.05.015 10.1186/1748-717X-1-45 10.1118/1.2241992 10.1118/1.1473137 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2010 Elsevier Inc. Elsevier Inc. 2015 INIST-CNRS Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2010 Elsevier Inc. – notice: Elsevier Inc. – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 OTOTI ADTOC UNPAY |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic OSTI.GOV Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content Unpaywall |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: UNPAY name: Unpaywall url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/ sourceTypes: Open Access Repository |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1879-355X |
| EndPage | 963 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai:iris.unimore.it:11380/1172467 21438028 20171796 23309958 10_1016_j_ijrobp_2009_08_012 S0360301609029630 1_s2_0_S0360301609029630 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Comparative Study |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) – fundername: Elekta AB |
| GroupedDBID | --- --K .1- .55 .FO .GJ 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~5 29J 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 AAEDT AAEDW AALRI AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAWTL AAXUO AAYWO ABEFU ABJNI ABLJU ABNEU ABOCM ABUDA ABWVN ACGFS ACIUM ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADMUD ADNMO ADVLN AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AGQPQ AGRDE AHHHB AIGII AITUG AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BELOY DU5 EBS EFKBS EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID G-2 GBLVA HED HMK HMO HVGLF HX~ HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LX3 M41 MO0 NQ- O9- OC~ OO- R2- RNS ROL RPZ SAE SDG SEL SES SEW SSZ UDS UV1 X7M XH2 XPP Z5R ZGI ~S- ADPAM AFCTW EFJIC RIG AAIAV AGZHU AHPSJ ALXNB ZA5 AAYXX CITATION AGCQF IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 ABPTK OTOTI ADTOC UNPAY |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-de22eb73f09a935939f482f7dd4a5ca4eccd904b2c0927a19c49a8c1876f38143 |
| IEDL.DBID | UNPAY |
| ISSN | 0360-3016 1879-355X |
| IngestDate | Sun Oct 26 03:17:15 EDT 2025 Thu May 18 18:39:20 EDT 2023 Sat Sep 27 21:58:30 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:01:56 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:13:57 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:12:51 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 03:16:11 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:20:10 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:18:55 EST 2025 Tue Oct 14 19:27:34 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) Pencil beam Monte Carlo Lung tumor Dose repartition Human Lung disease Radiodiagnosis Respiratory disease Lung cancer Radiosurgery Stereotaxia Malignant tumor Radiotherapy Algorithm Treatment Irradiation Medical imagery Bronchus disease Computerized axial tomography Treatment planning Comparative study Cancer Test object |
| Language | English |
| License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 CC BY 4.0 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. cc-by |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c639t-de22eb73f09a935939f482f7dd4a5ca4eccd904b2c0927a19c49a8c1876f38143 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/11380/1172467 |
| PMID | 20171796 |
| PQID | 755401110 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 9 |
| ParticipantIDs | unpaywall_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2009_08_012 osti_scitechconnect_21438028 proquest_miscellaneous_755401110 pubmed_primary_20171796 pascalfrancis_primary_23309958 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2009_08_012 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2009_08_012 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2009_08_012 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0360301609029630 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2009_08_012 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2010-11-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-11-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2010 text: 2010-11-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | New York, NY |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York, NY – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys |
| PublicationYear | 2010 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Inc Elsevier |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc – name: Elsevier |
| References | Nyman, Johansson, Hulten (bib5) 2006; 51 Kawrakow, Fippel, Friedrich (bib25) 1996; 23 Jang, Liu, Mohan (bib30) 2008; 71 Wang, Yorke, Chui (bib20) 2002; 29 Lax, Bromgren, Larson, Näslund (bib2) 1998; 1 Fippel (bib22) 1999; 26 Baumann, Nyman, Hoyer (bib3) 2008; 88 Yang, Li, Chen (bib21) 2005; 50 Fritz, Kraus, Blaschke (bib33) 2008; 60 Guckenberger, Wulf, Mueller (bib9) 2009; 74 Carrasco, Jornet, Duch (bib14) 2004; 31 Liu (bib31) 2002; 29 2009. In press. Haedinger, Krieger, Flentje, Wulf (bib16) 2005; 61 Takeda, Sanuki, Kunieda (bib11) 2009; 73 (bib24) 2004 Koelbl, Krieger, Haedinger, Sauer, Flentje (bib15) 2004; 180 Depuydt, Van Esch, Huyskens (bib29) 2002; 62 Fippel, Haryanto, Dohm, Nusslin, Kriesen (bib27) 2003; 30 Fritz, Kraus, Muehlnickel (bib7) 2006; 1 Dobler, Walter, Knopf (bib12) 2006; 1 Sikora, Dohm, Alber (bib28) 2007; 52 Siebers, Keall, Nahum, Mohan (bib32) 2000; 45 Hof, Muenter, Oetzel (bib4) 2007; 110 Vanderstraeten, Reynaert, Paelinck (bib18) 2006; 33 Krieger, Sauer (bib17) 2005; 50 Fippel, Laub, Huber, Nusslin (bib26) 1999; 44 McCammon, Schefter, Gaspar (bib10) 2009; 73 Fowler, Tome, Fenwick, Mehta (bib8) 2004; 60 Fakiris AJ, McGarry RC, Yiannoutsos CT, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non–small-cell lung carcinoma: Four-year results of a prospective Phase II study. Int J Reynaert, Van der Mark, Schaart (bib13) 2007; 76 Blomgren, Lax, Naslund, Svanstrom (bib1) 1995; 34 Onishi, Shirato, Nagata (bib6) 2007; 2 Seco, Adams, Bidmead, Partridge, Verhaegen (bib19) 2005; 50 Wang (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib20) 2002; 29 Sikora (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib28) 2007; 52 Fippel (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib22) 1999; 26 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib23 Koelbl (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib15) 2004; 180 Onishi (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib6) 2007; 2 Depuydt (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib29) 2002; 62 Fritz (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib33) 2008; 60 Fippel (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib27) 2003; 30 Blomgren (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib1) 1995; 34 Takeda (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib11) 2009; 73 Siebers (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib32) 2000; 45 Fritz (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib7) 2006; 1 Dobler (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib12) 2006; 1 Yang (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib21) 2005; 50 Haedinger (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib16) 2005; 61 Carrasco (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib14) 2004; 31 Hof (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib4) 2007; 110 Fowler (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib8) 2004; 60 Fippel (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib26) 1999; 44 Vanderstraeten (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib18) 2006; 33 Nyman (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib5) 2006; 51 Reynaert (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib13) 2007; 76 Guckenberger (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib9) 2009; 74 Lax (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib2) 1998; 1 Kawrakow (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib25) 1996; 23 Krieger (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib17) 2005; 50 Seco (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib19) 2005; 50 Baumann (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib3) 2008; 88 McCammon (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib10) 2009; 73 Liu (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib31) 2002; 29 (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib24) 2004 Jang (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib30) 2008; 71 |
| References_xml | – volume: 73 start-page: 442 year: 2009 end-page: 448 ident: bib11 article-title: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary lung cancer at a dose of 50 Gy total in five fractions to the periphery of the planning target volume calculated using a superposition algorithm publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 71 start-page: 1537 year: 2008 end-page: 1546 ident: bib30 article-title: Underestimation of low-dose radiation in the treatment of intensity-modulated radiotherapy publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 23 start-page: 445 year: 1996 end-page: 457 ident: bib25 article-title: 3D electron dose calculation using a Voxel based Monte Carlo algorithm (VMC) publication-title: Med Phys – volume: 44 start-page: 3039 year: 1999 end-page: 3054 ident: bib26 article-title: Experimental investigation of a fast Monte Carlo photon beam dose calculation algorithm publication-title: Phys Med Biol – volume: 52 start-page: 4449 year: 2007 end-page: 4463 ident: bib28 article-title: A virtual photon source model of an Elekta linear accelerator with integrated mini MLC for Monte Carlo based IMRT dose calculation publication-title: Phys Med Biol – volume: 51 start-page: 97 year: 2006 end-page: 103 ident: bib5 article-title: Stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer—Mature results for medically inoperable patients publication-title: Lung Cancer – volume: 1 start-page: 30 year: 2006 ident: bib7 article-title: Stereotactic, single-dose irradiation of stage I non-small cell lung cancer and lung metastases publication-title: Radiat Oncol – volume: 26 start-page: 1466 year: 1999 end-page: 1475 ident: bib22 article-title: Fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for photon beams based on the VMC electron algorithm publication-title: Med Phys – volume: 76 start-page: 643 year: 2007 end-page: 686 ident: bib13 article-title: Monte Carlo treatment planning for photon and electron beams publication-title: Radiat Phys Chem – volume: 30 start-page: 301 year: 2003 end-page: 311 ident: bib27 article-title: A virtual photon energy fluence model for Monte Carlo dose calculation publication-title: Med Phys – volume: 1 start-page: 45 year: 2006 ident: bib12 article-title: Optimization of extracranial stereotactic radiation therapy of small lung lesions using accurate dose calculation algorithms publication-title: Radiat Oncol – volume: 60 start-page: 1241 year: 2004 end-page: 1256 ident: bib8 article-title: A challenge to traditional radiation oncology publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 73 start-page: 112 year: 2009 end-page: 118 ident: bib10 article-title: Observation of a dose–control relationship for lung and liver tumors after stereotactic body radiation therapy publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 180 start-page: 783 year: 2004 end-page: 788 ident: bib15 article-title: Influence of calculation algorithm on dose distribution in irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collapsed cone versus pencil beam publication-title: Strahlenther Onkol – volume: 29 start-page: 922 year: 2002 end-page: 923 ident: bib31 article-title: Dm rather than Dw should be used in Monte Carlo treatment planning. For the proposition publication-title: Med Phys – volume: 29 start-page: 2705 year: 2002 end-page: 2717 ident: bib20 article-title: Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments publication-title: Med Phys – volume: 74 start-page: 47 year: 2009 end-page: 54 ident: bib9 article-title: Dose–response relationship for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of pulmonary tumors: Relevance of 4D dose calculation publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 1 start-page: 135 year: 1998 end-page: 148 ident: bib2 article-title: Extracranial stereotactic radiosurgery of localized targets publication-title: J Radiosurgery – volume: 50 start-page: 869 year: 2005 end-page: 878 ident: bib21 article-title: Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer publication-title: Phys Med Biol – volume: 60 start-page: 193 year: 2008 end-page: 199 ident: bib33 article-title: Stereotactic, high single-dose irradiation of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using 4-dimensional CT scans for treatment planning publication-title: Lung Cancer – volume: 50 start-page: 817 year: 2005 end-page: 830 ident: bib19 article-title: Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine publication-title: Phys Med Biol – volume: 62 start-page: 309 year: 2002 end-page: 319 ident: bib29 article-title: A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: Refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation publication-title: Radiother Oncol – volume: 50 start-page: 859 year: 2005 end-page: 868 ident: bib17 article-title: Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom publication-title: Phys Med Biol – reference: 2009. In press. – year: 2004 ident: bib24 article-title: AAPM Report No. 85 – reference: Fakiris AJ, McGarry RC, Yiannoutsos CT, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non–small-cell lung carcinoma: Four-year results of a prospective Phase II study. Int J – volume: 88 start-page: 359 year: 2008 end-page: 367 ident: bib3 article-title: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for medically inoperable patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer—A first report of toxicity related to COPD/CVD in a non-randomized prospective phase II study publication-title: Radiother Oncol – volume: 34 start-page: 861 year: 1995 end-page: 870 ident: bib1 article-title: Stereotactic high dose fraction radiation therapy of extracranial tumors using an accelerator. Clinical experience of the first thirty-one patients publication-title: Acta Oncol – volume: 2 start-page: S94 year: 2007 end-page: S100 ident: bib6 article-title: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HypoFXSRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: Updated results of 257 patients in a Japanese multi-institutional study publication-title: J Thorac Oncol – volume: 61 start-page: 239 year: 2005 end-page: 249 ident: bib16 article-title: Influence of calculation model on dose distribution in stereotactic radiotherapy for pulmonary targets publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 110 start-page: 148 year: 2007 end-page: 155 ident: bib4 article-title: Stereotactic single-dose radiotherapy (radiosurgery) of early stage nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) publication-title: Cancer – volume: 31 start-page: 2899 year: 2004 end-page: 2911 ident: bib14 article-title: Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium publication-title: Med Phys – volume: 33 start-page: 3149 year: 2006 end-page: 3158 ident: bib18 article-title: Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations publication-title: Med Phys – volume: 45 start-page: 983 year: 2000 end-page: 995 ident: bib32 article-title: Converting absorbed dose to medium to absorbed dose to water for Monte Carlo based photon beam dose calculations publication-title: Phys Med Biol – volume: 74 start-page: 47 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib9 article-title: Dose–response relationship for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of pulmonary tumors: Relevance of 4D dose calculation publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1939 – volume: 50 start-page: 869 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib21 article-title: Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer publication-title: Phys Med Biol doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/011 – volume: 60 start-page: 193 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib33 article-title: Stereotactic, high single-dose irradiation of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using 4-dimensional CT scans for treatment planning publication-title: Lung Cancer doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.10.005 – volume: 31 start-page: 2899 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib14 article-title: Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1118/1.1788932 – year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib24 – volume: 26 start-page: 1466 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib22 article-title: Fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for photon beams based on the VMC electron algorithm publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1118/1.598676 – volume: 52 start-page: 4449 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib28 article-title: A virtual photon source model of an Elekta linear accelerator with integrated mini MLC for Monte Carlo based IMRT dose calculation publication-title: Phys Med Biol doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/15/006 – volume: 23 start-page: 445 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib25 article-title: 3D electron dose calculation using a Voxel based Monte Carlo algorithm (VMC) publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1118/1.597673 – volume: 51 start-page: 97 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib5 article-title: Stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer—Mature results for medically inoperable patients publication-title: Lung Cancer doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.08.011 – volume: 180 start-page: 783 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib15 article-title: Influence of calculation algorithm on dose distribution in irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collapsed cone versus pencil beam publication-title: Strahlenther Onkol doi: 10.1007/s00066-004-1268-4 – volume: 29 start-page: 2705 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib20 article-title: Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1118/1.1517291 – volume: 73 start-page: 112 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib10 article-title: Observation of a dose–control relationship for lung and liver tumors after stereotactic body radiation therapy publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.062 – volume: 50 start-page: 859 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib17 article-title: Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom publication-title: Phys Med Biol doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/010 – volume: 50 start-page: 817 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib19 article-title: Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine publication-title: Phys Med Biol doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/007 – volume: 2 start-page: S94 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib6 article-title: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HypoFXSRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: Updated results of 257 patients in a Japanese multi-institutional study publication-title: J Thorac Oncol doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318074de34 – volume: 45 start-page: 983 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib32 article-title: Converting absorbed dose to medium to absorbed dose to water for Monte Carlo based photon beam dose calculations publication-title: Phys Med Biol doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/4/313 – volume: 73 start-page: 442 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib11 article-title: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary lung cancer at a dose of 50 Gy total in five fractions to the periphery of the planning target volume calculated using a superposition algorithm publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.043 – volume: 88 start-page: 359 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib3 article-title: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for medically inoperable patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer—A first report of toxicity related to COPD/CVD in a non-randomized prospective phase II study publication-title: Radiother Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.019 – volume: 34 start-page: 861 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib1 article-title: Stereotactic high dose fraction radiation therapy of extracranial tumors using an accelerator. Clinical experience of the first thirty-one patients publication-title: Acta Oncol doi: 10.3109/02841869509127197 – volume: 110 start-page: 148 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib4 article-title: Stereotactic single-dose radiotherapy (radiosurgery) of early stage nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.22763 – volume: 1 start-page: 30 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib7 article-title: Stereotactic, single-dose irradiation of stage I non-small cell lung cancer and lung metastases publication-title: Radiat Oncol doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-1-30 – volume: 61 start-page: 239 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib16 article-title: Influence of calculation model on dose distribution in stereotactic radiotherapy for pulmonary targets publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.028 – volume: 1 start-page: 135 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib2 article-title: Extracranial stereotactic radiosurgery of localized targets publication-title: J Radiosurgery doi: 10.1023/B:JORA.0000010898.87146.2e – volume: 60 start-page: 1241 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib8 article-title: A challenge to traditional radiation oncology publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.691 – volume: 30 start-page: 301 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib27 article-title: A virtual photon energy fluence model for Monte Carlo dose calculation publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1118/1.1543152 – ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib23 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.042 – volume: 62 start-page: 309 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib29 article-title: A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: Refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation publication-title: Radiother Oncol doi: 10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00497-2 – volume: 44 start-page: 3039 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib26 article-title: Experimental investigation of a fast Monte Carlo photon beam dose calculation algorithm publication-title: Phys Med Biol doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/12/313 – volume: 71 start-page: 1537 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib30 article-title: Underestimation of low-dose radiation in the treatment of intensity-modulated radiotherapy publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.014 – volume: 76 start-page: 643 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib13 article-title: Monte Carlo treatment planning for photon and electron beams publication-title: Radiat Phys Chem doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2006.05.015 – volume: 1 start-page: 45 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib12 article-title: Optimization of extracranial stereotactic radiation therapy of small lung lesions using accurate dose calculation algorithms publication-title: Radiat Oncol doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-1-45 – volume: 33 start-page: 3149 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib18 article-title: Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1118/1.2241992 – volume: 29 start-page: 922 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012_bib31 article-title: Dm rather than Dw should be used in Monte Carlo treatment planning. For the proposition publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1118/1.1473137 |
| SSID | ssj0001174 |
| Score | 2.1579945 |
| Snippet | Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to compare dose... Purpose Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to... Purpose: Dose calculation based on pencil beam (PB) algorithms has its shortcomings predicting dose in tissue heterogeneities. The aim of this study was to... |
| SourceID | unpaywall osti proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 955 |
| SubjectTerms | ALGORITHMS Biological and medical sciences BODY CALCULATION METHODS Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery CAT SCANNING COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES DISEASES Diseases of the respiratory system DOSES Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Lung - anatomy & histology Lung - diagnostic imaging Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Lung Neoplasms - pathology Lung Neoplasms - surgery Lung tumor LUNGS MATHEMATICAL LOGIC Medical sciences MEDICINE Monte Carlo MONTE CARLO METHOD NEOPLASMS NUCLEAR MEDICINE ORGANS Pencil beam Phantoms, Imaging PLANNING Pneumology RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS RADIATION DOSES Radiography RADIOLOGY RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE Radiometry - methods Radiosurgery - instrumentation Radiosurgery - methods RADIOTHERAPY Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) THERAPY TOMOGRAPHY Tumor Burden Tumors of the respiratory system and mediastinum |
| Title | Stereotactic, Single-Dose Irradiation of Lung Tumors: A Comparison of Absolute Dose and Dose Distribution Between Pencil Beam and Monte Carlo Algorithms Based on Actual Patient CT Scans |
| URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0360301609029630 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0360301609029630 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.012 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20171796 https://www.proquest.com/docview/755401110 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/21438028 http://hdl.handle.net/11380/1172467 |
| UnpaywallVersion | submittedVersion |
| Volume | 78 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVLSH databaseName: Elsevier Journals customDbUrl: mediaType: online eissn: 1879-355X dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001174 issn: 1879-355X databaseCode: AKRWK dateStart: 19761001 isFulltext: true providerName: Library Specific Holdings |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3LbtNAFB2VROKx4FkgUKJZsMSRPeMnOzehKpRWEUlEWI3G9hhSHLuyHSH4M_6Oez12KFBo2USJPEfx476sufccQp5Dvea7MbcN1wvgBcXmypBBYhsplxaPlEJGc-y2OHEPF_abpbPcIZ3g3W_0ApbFfRM-PQb-fI30XQcK7h7pL06m4Qe9CwlRxGwETlE224DsuewG5JourtVpWUQdL6U_Mi32twTUK8CnsDVSVnB3Ui1rcVHdeYvc2ORn8usXmWXnctHBHTLpJnp0C8rn0aaORvG3Pwke_3WZd8ntthaloTaee2RH5ffJ9eN2t_0B-T6Dm66KupmjekFnkOUyZUyKStHXZYmkBvhUaZHStxAy6HyzLsrqJQ3peCtuiAfDqLFvRRsknI_-MkHK3lZti-7rdjE6BadZZfBTrpuVx0ieRceyzAoaZh-LclV_Wld0H3JvQgEXNvMvdKrZYel4TmdgK9UuWRy8mo8PjVbqwYihRKqNRDGmIo-nZiBxVpgHqe2z1EsSWzqxtMHQksC0IxabAfOkFcR2IP0YnrmbQs1h84eklxe5ekyo9FNAOqmburAocaWVRDaPXDC7gCeSDQjvnr-IWx50lOPIRNfwdiq01aBEZyBQpdMClLFFnWkekEvWO51piW7GFaKygER1Cc67CKeqNrRUwhIVE6aYoe2j6WNjLURR8zyyrZ50VXSF_9xD20cUEgfH2GEFMGahGgHzB2T4i09sr59xDu8XDiygnZMICE644yRzVWwq4UGxCgnEgpN7pJ3nJxiJmrzAHZDR1puudGef_C_gKbnZtHw0A6R7pFeXG_UMKsk6GpJ-ePTu_dGwjSg_AAxnb_U |
| linkProvider | Unpaywall |
| linkToUnpaywall | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Jb9NAFB6VVGI5sC-BUs2BI47smfEy3NyEqiBaRUoihdNobI9LimNXtiME_4x_x3teQoFCyyVK5PkUL2-z5r3vI-QV1GuBF3Nheb6EFxTBjaVlIqyUa4dHxiCjOXZbnHhHC_F-6S53SC949xu9gOPwwIZPn4E_3yC7ngsF94DsLk6m4cd2FxKiiN0InKJstgXZc9kPyDVdXKuzsoh6XspgZDvsbwloUIBPYWukruDupK2sxWV15x1ya5Of669fdJZdyEWH98ikn-hpW1A-jzZ1NIq__Unw-K_LvE_udrUoDVvjeUB2TP6Q3Dzudtsfke8zuOmmqJs5qtd0BlkuM9akqAx9V5ZIaoBPlRYp_QAhg84366Ks3tCQjrfihngwjBr7NrRBwvm0XyZI2dupbdGDtl2MTsFpVhn81Otm5TGSZ9GxLrOChtlpUa7qT-uKHkDuTSjgwmb-hU5bdlg6ntMZ2Er1mCwO387HR1Yn9WDFUCLVVmIYM5HPU1tqnBXmMhUBS_0kEdqNtQBDS6QtIhbbkvnakbGQOojhmXsp1ByCPyGDvMjNM0J1kALSTb3Ug0WJp50kEjzywOwkTzQbEt4_fxV3POgox5GpvuHtTLVWgxKdUqFKpwMoa4s6b3lArljv9qal-hlXiMoKEtUVOP8ynKm60FIpR1VM2WqGto-mj421EEXti8iuemqromv85x7aPqKQODjGDiuAMQfVCFgwJPu_-MT2-hnn8H7hwgLaO4mC4IQ7Tjo3xaZSPhSrkEAcOLmnrfP8BCNRky-9IRltvelad_b5_wJekNtNy0czQLpHBnW5MS-hkqyj_S6S_ACUlW5S |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stereotactic%2C+Single-Dose+Irradiation+of+Lung+Tumors%3A+A+Comparison+of+Absolute+Dose+and+Dose+Distribution+Between+Pencil+Beam+and+Monte+Carlo+Algorithms+Based+on+Actual+Patient+CT+Scans&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+radiation+oncology%2C+biology%2C+physics&rft.au=Chen+Huixiao&rft.au=Lohr%2C+Frank&rft.au=Fritz%2C+Peter&rft.au=Wenz%2C+Frederik&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijrobp.2009.08.012&rft.externalDocID=21438028 |
| thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F03603016%2FS0360301610X00141%2Fcov150h.gif |