dConsensus: a tool for displaying domain assignments by multiple structure-based algorithms and for construction of a consensus assignment
Background Partitioning of a protein into structural components, known as domains, is an important initial step in protein classification and for functional and evolutionary studies. While the systematic assignments of domains by human experts exist (CATH and SCOP), the introduction of high throughp...
Saved in:
| Published in | BMC bioinformatics Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 310 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
London
BioMed Central
09.06.2010
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1471-2105 1471-2105 |
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-11-310 |
Cover
| Abstract | Background
Partitioning of a protein into structural components, known as domains, is an important initial step in protein classification and for functional and evolutionary studies. While the systematic assignments of domains by human experts exist (CATH and SCOP), the introduction of high throughput technologies for structure determination threatens to overwhelm expert approaches. A variety of algorithmic methods have been developed to expedite this process, allowing almost instant structural decomposition into domains. The performance of algorithmic methods can approach 85% agreement on the number of domains with the consensus reached by experts. However, each algorithm takes a somewhat different conceptual approach, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. Currently there is no simple way to automatically compare assignments from different structure-based domain assignment methods, thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of possible structure partitioning as well as providing some insight into the tendencies of particular algorithms. Most importantly, a consensus assignment drawn from multiple assignment methods can provide a singular and presumably more accurate view.
Results
We introduce dConsensus
http://pdomains.sdsc.edu/dConsensus
; a web resource that displays the results of calculations from multiple algorithmic methods and generates a domain assignment consensus with an associated reliability score. Domain assignments from seven structure-based algorithms - PDP, PUU, DomainParser2, NCBI method, DHcL, DDomains and Dodis are available for analysis and comparison alongside assignments made by expert methods. The assignments are available for all protein chains in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). A consensus domain assignment is built by either allowing each algorithm to contribute equally (simple approach) or by weighting the contribution of each method by its prior performance and observed tendencies. An analysis of secondary structure around domain and fragment boundaries is also available for display and further analysis.
Conclusion
dConsensus provides a comprehensive assignment of protein domains. For the first time, seven algorithmic methods are brought together with no need to access each method separately via a webserver or local copy of the software. This aggregation permits a consensus domain assignment to be computed. Comparison viewing of the consensus and choice methods provides the user with insights into the fundamental units of protein structure so important to the study of evolutionary and functional relationships. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Partitioning of a protein into structural components, known as domains, is an important initial step in protein classification and for functional and evolutionary studies. While the systematic assignments of domains by human experts exist (CATH and SCOP), the introduction of high throughput technologies for structure determination threatens to overwhelm expert approaches. A variety of algorithmic methods have been developed to expedite this process, allowing almost instant structural decomposition into domains. The performance of algorithmic methods can approach 85% agreement on the number of domains with the consensus reached by experts. However, each algorithm takes a somewhat different conceptual approach, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. Currently there is no simple way to automatically compare assignments from different structure-based domain assignment methods, thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of possible structure partitioning as well as providing some insight into the tendencies of particular algorithms. Most importantly, a consensus assignment drawn from multiple assignment methods can provide a singular and presumably more accurate view.
We introduce dConsensus http://pdomains.sdsc.edu/dConsensus; a web resource that displays the results of calculations from multiple algorithmic methods and generates a domain assignment consensus with an associated reliability score. Domain assignments from seven structure-based algorithms - PDP, PUU, DomainParser2, NCBI method, DHcL, DDomains and Dodis are available for analysis and comparison alongside assignments made by expert methods. The assignments are available for all protein chains in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). A consensus domain assignment is built by either allowing each algorithm to contribute equally (simple approach) or by weighting the contribution of each method by its prior performance and observed tendencies. An analysis of secondary structure around domain and fragment boundaries is also available for display and further analysis.
dConsensus provides a comprehensive assignment of protein domains. For the first time, seven algorithmic methods are brought together with no need to access each method separately via a webserver or local copy of the software. This aggregation permits a consensus domain assignment to be computed. Comparison viewing of the consensus and choice methods provides the user with insights into the fundamental units of protein structure so important to the study of evolutionary and functional relationships. Background Partitioning of a protein into structural components, known as domains, is an important initial step in protein classification and for functional and evolutionary studies. While the systematic assignments of domains by human experts exist (CATH and SCOP), the introduction of high throughput technologies for structure determination threatens to overwhelm expert approaches. A variety of algorithmic methods have been developed to expedite this process, allowing almost instant structural decomposition into domains. The performance of algorithmic methods can approach 85% agreement on the number of domains with the consensus reached by experts. However, each algorithm takes a somewhat different conceptual approach, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. Currently there is no simple way to automatically compare assignments from different structure-based domain assignment methods, thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of possible structure partitioning as well as providing some insight into the tendencies of particular algorithms. Most importantly, a consensus assignment drawn from multiple assignment methods can provide a singular and presumably more accurate view. Results We introduce dConsensus Conclusion dConsensus provides a comprehensive assignment of protein domains. For the first time, seven algorithmic methods are brought together with no need to access each method separately via a webserver or local copy of the software. This aggregation permits a consensus domain assignment to be computed. Comparison viewing of the consensus and choice methods provides the user with insights into the fundamental units of protein structure so important to the study of evolutionary and functional relationships. Abstract Background Partitioning of a protein into structural components, known as domains, is an important initial step in protein classification and for functional and evolutionary studies. While the systematic assignments of domains by human experts exist (CATH and SCOP), the introduction of high throughput technologies for structure determination threatens to overwhelm expert approaches. A variety of algorithmic methods have been developed to expedite this process, allowing almost instant structural decomposition into domains. The performance of algorithmic methods can approach 85% agreement on the number of domains with the consensus reached by experts. However, each algorithm takes a somewhat different conceptual approach, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. Currently there is no simple way to automatically compare assignments from different structure-based domain assignment methods, thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of possible structure partitioning as well as providing some insight into the tendencies of particular algorithms. Most importantly, a consensus assignment drawn from multiple assignment methods can provide a singular and presumably more accurate view. Results We introduce dConsensus http://pdomains.sdsc.edu/dConsensus; a web resource that displays the results of calculations from multiple algorithmic methods and generates a domain assignment consensus with an associated reliability score. Domain assignments from seven structure-based algorithms - PDP, PUU, DomainParser2, NCBI method, DHcL, DDomains and Dodis are available for analysis and comparison alongside assignments made by expert methods. The assignments are available for all protein chains in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). A consensus domain assignment is built by either allowing each algorithm to contribute equally (simple approach) or by weighting the contribution of each method by its prior performance and observed tendencies. An analysis of secondary structure around domain and fragment boundaries is also available for display and further analysis. Conclusion dConsensus provides a comprehensive assignment of protein domains. For the first time, seven algorithmic methods are brought together with no need to access each method separately via a webserver or local copy of the software. This aggregation permits a consensus domain assignment to be computed. Comparison viewing of the consensus and choice methods provides the user with insights into the fundamental units of protein structure so important to the study of evolutionary and functional relationships. Partitioning of a protein into structural components, known as domains, is an important initial step in protein classification and for functional and evolutionary studies. While the systematic assignments of domains by human experts exist (CATH and SCOP), the introduction of high throughput technologies for structure determination threatens to overwhelm expert approaches. A variety of algorithmic methods have been developed to expedite this process, allowing almost instant structural decomposition into domains. The performance of algorithmic methods can approach 85% agreement on the number of domains with the consensus reached by experts. However, each algorithm takes a somewhat different conceptual approach, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. Currently there is no simple way to automatically compare assignments from different structure-based domain assignment methods, thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of possible structure partitioning as well as providing some insight into the tendencies of particular algorithms. Most importantly, a consensus assignment drawn from multiple assignment methods can provide a singular and presumably more accurate view.BACKGROUNDPartitioning of a protein into structural components, known as domains, is an important initial step in protein classification and for functional and evolutionary studies. While the systematic assignments of domains by human experts exist (CATH and SCOP), the introduction of high throughput technologies for structure determination threatens to overwhelm expert approaches. A variety of algorithmic methods have been developed to expedite this process, allowing almost instant structural decomposition into domains. The performance of algorithmic methods can approach 85% agreement on the number of domains with the consensus reached by experts. However, each algorithm takes a somewhat different conceptual approach, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. Currently there is no simple way to automatically compare assignments from different structure-based domain assignment methods, thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of possible structure partitioning as well as providing some insight into the tendencies of particular algorithms. Most importantly, a consensus assignment drawn from multiple assignment methods can provide a singular and presumably more accurate view.We introduce dConsensus http://pdomains.sdsc.edu/dConsensus; a web resource that displays the results of calculations from multiple algorithmic methods and generates a domain assignment consensus with an associated reliability score. Domain assignments from seven structure-based algorithms - PDP, PUU, DomainParser2, NCBI method, DHcL, DDomains and Dodis are available for analysis and comparison alongside assignments made by expert methods. The assignments are available for all protein chains in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). A consensus domain assignment is built by either allowing each algorithm to contribute equally (simple approach) or by weighting the contribution of each method by its prior performance and observed tendencies. An analysis of secondary structure around domain and fragment boundaries is also available for display and further analysis.RESULTSWe introduce dConsensus http://pdomains.sdsc.edu/dConsensus; a web resource that displays the results of calculations from multiple algorithmic methods and generates a domain assignment consensus with an associated reliability score. Domain assignments from seven structure-based algorithms - PDP, PUU, DomainParser2, NCBI method, DHcL, DDomains and Dodis are available for analysis and comparison alongside assignments made by expert methods. The assignments are available for all protein chains in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). A consensus domain assignment is built by either allowing each algorithm to contribute equally (simple approach) or by weighting the contribution of each method by its prior performance and observed tendencies. An analysis of secondary structure around domain and fragment boundaries is also available for display and further analysis.dConsensus provides a comprehensive assignment of protein domains. For the first time, seven algorithmic methods are brought together with no need to access each method separately via a webserver or local copy of the software. This aggregation permits a consensus domain assignment to be computed. Comparison viewing of the consensus and choice methods provides the user with insights into the fundamental units of protein structure so important to the study of evolutionary and functional relationships.CONCLUSIONdConsensus provides a comprehensive assignment of protein domains. For the first time, seven algorithmic methods are brought together with no need to access each method separately via a webserver or local copy of the software. This aggregation permits a consensus domain assignment to be computed. Comparison viewing of the consensus and choice methods provides the user with insights into the fundamental units of protein structure so important to the study of evolutionary and functional relationships. Partitioning of a protein into structural components, known as domains, is an important initial step in protein classification and for functional and evolutionary studies. While the systematic assignments of domains by human experts exist (CATH and SCOP), the introduction of high throughput technologies for structure determination threatens to overwhelm expert approaches. A variety of algorithmic methods have been developed to expedite this process, allowing almost instant structural decomposition into domains. The performance of algorithmic methods can approach 85% agreement on the number of domains with the consensus reached by experts. However, each algorithm takes a somewhat different conceptual approach, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. Currently there is no simple way to automatically compare assignments from different structure-based domain assignment methods, thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of possible structure partitioning as well as providing some insight into the tendencies of particular algorithms. Most importantly, a consensus assignment drawn from multiple assignment methods can provide a singular and presumably more accurate view. We introduce dConsensus http://pdomains.sdsc.edu/dConsensus; a web resource that displays the results of calculations from multiple algorithmic methods and generates a domain assignment consensus with an associated reliability score. Domain assignments from seven structure-based algorithms - PDP, PUU, DomainParser2, NCBI method, DHcL, DDomains and Dodis are available for analysis and comparison alongside assignments made by expert methods. The assignments are available for all protein chains in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). A consensus domain assignment is built by either allowing each algorithm to contribute equally (simple approach) or by weighting the contribution of each method by its prior performance and observed tendencies. An analysis of secondary structure around domain and fragment boundaries is also available for display and further analysis. dConsensus provides a comprehensive assignment of protein domains. For the first time, seven algorithmic methods are brought together with no need to access each method separately via a webserver or local copy of the software. This aggregation permits a consensus domain assignment to be computed. Comparison viewing of the consensus and choice methods provides the user with insights into the fundamental units of protein structure so important to the study of evolutionary and functional relationships. Background Partitioning of a protein into structural components, known as domains, is an important initial step in protein classification and for functional and evolutionary studies. While the systematic assignments of domains by human experts exist (CATH and SCOP), the introduction of high throughput technologies for structure determination threatens to overwhelm expert approaches. A variety of algorithmic methods have been developed to expedite this process, allowing almost instant structural decomposition into domains. The performance of algorithmic methods can approach 85% agreement on the number of domains with the consensus reached by experts. However, each algorithm takes a somewhat different conceptual approach, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. Currently there is no simple way to automatically compare assignments from different structure-based domain assignment methods, thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of possible structure partitioning as well as providing some insight into the tendencies of particular algorithms. Most importantly, a consensus assignment drawn from multiple assignment methods can provide a singular and presumably more accurate view. Results We introduce dConsensus http://pdomains.sdsc.edu/dConsensus ; a web resource that displays the results of calculations from multiple algorithmic methods and generates a domain assignment consensus with an associated reliability score. Domain assignments from seven structure-based algorithms - PDP, PUU, DomainParser2, NCBI method, DHcL, DDomains and Dodis are available for analysis and comparison alongside assignments made by expert methods. The assignments are available for all protein chains in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). A consensus domain assignment is built by either allowing each algorithm to contribute equally (simple approach) or by weighting the contribution of each method by its prior performance and observed tendencies. An analysis of secondary structure around domain and fragment boundaries is also available for display and further analysis. Conclusion dConsensus provides a comprehensive assignment of protein domains. For the first time, seven algorithmic methods are brought together with no need to access each method separately via a webserver or local copy of the software. This aggregation permits a consensus domain assignment to be computed. Comparison viewing of the consensus and choice methods provides the user with insights into the fundamental units of protein structure so important to the study of evolutionary and functional relationships. |
| ArticleNumber | 310 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Veretnik, Stella Alden, Kieran Bourne, Philip E |
| AuthorAffiliation | 1 York Centre for Complex Systems Analysis (YCCSA), University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK 3 Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0636, USA 2 San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0743, USA |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 York Centre for Complex Systems Analysis (YCCSA), University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK – name: 3 Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0636, USA – name: 2 San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0743, USA |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kieran surname: Alden fullname: Alden, Kieran organization: York Centre for Complex Systems Analysis (YCCSA), University of York – sequence: 2 givenname: Stella surname: Veretnik fullname: Veretnik, Stella email: veretnik@sdsc.edu organization: San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California San Diego – sequence: 3 givenname: Philip E surname: Bourne fullname: Bourne, Philip E organization: Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20529369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNUsmO1DAUjNAgZoE7JxSJA-KQwY4TO-GANBqxjDQSEsvZevGS8cixG9sB-hf4atzLtLoRm3JI_FJV77nqnRZHzjtVFI8xOse4oy9ww3BVY9RWGFcEo3vFya50tPd9XJzGeIsQZh1qHxTHNWrrntD-pPghL72LysU5viyhTN7bUvtQShMXFpbGjaX0ExhXQoxmdJNyKZbDspxmm8zCqjKmMIs0B1UNEJUswY4-mHQzxRKcXIuJ3GKNMt6VXuc-4q7pnuzD4r4GG9Wj7fus-Pzm9afLd9X1-7dXlxfXlaCEpqrXqEesIVoKKZQSDaMSWDugWmqpqO7QMLSk63XTsAENeGh7qDGTiDBCAAZyVlxtdKWHW74IZoKw5B4MXxd8GDmEZIRVXDAqQKnsbDc0AoteSyaoHhQC3NKmy1p4ozW7BSy_gbU7QYz4KiO-CoGvQshHnpUy59WGs5iHSeU7uBTAHgxy-MeZGz76r7zuetaRlcCzrUDwX2YVE59MFMpacMrPkbOmZZjSlvwbSQhtcLMe6ukGOUK-t3Ha59ZiheYXNcmON02LM-r8N6j8SDWZnKnSJtcPCM8PCBmT1Pc0whwjv_r44RD7ZN-XnSF3y5oBdAMQwccYlObCJFgtVZ7C2L85jn4h_kdI22BjhrpRBX7r5-DyXv6Z8xNnPh0z |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00894_013_1991_9 crossref_primary_10_1093_bioinformatics_bty973 crossref_primary_10_1621_nrs_13003 crossref_primary_10_1002_prot_24547 crossref_primary_10_1021_jp210568a crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmb_2014_11_003 crossref_primary_10_1126_sciadv_1600552 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_022_04902_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pbiomolbio_2016_09_009 crossref_primary_10_1093_bioinformatics_btq572 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_str_2013_01_019 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_13_286 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00260-8 10.1093/nar/gkh039 10.1093/nar/gkn326 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.05.060 10.1093/nar/gkg189 10.1002/pro.5560070202 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90136-3 10.1110/ps.062597307 10.1073/pnas.70.3.697 10.1093/nar/gkl959 10.1107/S0021889807023874 10.1002/prot.340190309 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg006 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.053 10.1002/prot.340230309 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Alden et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. COPYRIGHT 2010 BioMed Central Ltd. Copyright ©2010 Alden et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010 Alden et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Alden et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2010 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: Copyright ©2010 Alden et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010 Alden et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISR 7X8 7QO 8FD FR3 P64 5PM ADTOC UNPAY DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-11-310 |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature Link OA Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context Science MEDLINE - Academic Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content Unpaywall DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic Engineering Research Database Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic Engineering Research Database |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature Link OA Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 5 dbid: UNPAY name: Unpaywall url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/ sourceTypes: Open Access Repository |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Biology |
| EISSN | 1471-2105 |
| EndPage | 310 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_c76caee3108b4c1c9fd7c6fbe0a15648 10.1186/1471-2105-11-310 PMC2897830 A230904451 20529369 10_1186_1471_2105_11_310 |
| Genre | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
| GeographicLocations | United States United Kingdom |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom – name: United States |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2VQ 2WC 4.4 53G 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8AO 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AAKPC AASML ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADMLS ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS ARAPS AZQEC BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BGLVJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C1A C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO ICD IHR INH INR IPNFZ ISR ITC K6V K7- KQ8 LK8 M1P M48 M7P MK~ ML0 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P P62 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RIG RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XH6 XSB AAYXX CITATION ALIPV CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7QO 8FD FR3 P64 5PM 123 ADTOC AFFHD UNPAY |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-9f090743fdcdceec476da75b02dfde6f80bb5389f447b0b1b59a217d03733aab3 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 1471-2105 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:50:30 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 29 12:17:11 EDT 2025 Tue Sep 30 16:32:20 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 09:52:52 EDT 2025 Thu Oct 02 06:06:40 EDT 2025 Mon Oct 20 22:01:07 EDT 2025 Mon Oct 20 16:45:42 EDT 2025 Thu Oct 16 14:59:19 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:04:10 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:08:33 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 04:15:17 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:27:15 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Reliability Score Algorithmic Method Protein Data Bank Protein Chain Secondary Structure Element |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. cc-by |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c636t-9f090743fdcdceec476da75b02dfde6f80bb5389f447b0b1b59a217d03733aab3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/1471-2105-11-310 |
| PMID | 20529369 |
| PQID | 733641410 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c76caee3108b4c1c9fd7c6fbe0a15648 unpaywall_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_11_310 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2897830 proquest_miscellaneous_745716653 proquest_miscellaneous_733641410 gale_infotracmisc_A230904451 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A230904451 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A230904451 pubmed_primary_20529369 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1471_2105_11_310 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_11_310 springer_journals_10_1186_1471_2105_11_310 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2010-06-09 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-06-09 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2010 text: 2010-06-09 day: 09 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | BMC bioinformatics |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMC Bioinformatics |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Bioinformatics |
| PublicationYear | 2010 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
| References | S Veretnik (3767_CR6) 2009 S Jones (3767_CR9) 1998; 7 G Koczyk (3767_CR17) 2008; 36 HM Berman (3767_CR19) 2000; 28 CA Orengo (3767_CR10) 1997; 5 DB Wetlaufer (3767_CR1) 1973; 70 H Zhou (3767_CR15) 2007; 16 J Guo (3767_CR13) 2003; 31 L Holm (3767_CR14) 1994; 19 S Veretnik (3767_CR7) 2004; 339 LH Greene (3767_CR4) 2007; 35 T Madej (3767_CR16) 1995; 23 N Alexandrov (3767_CR12) 2003; 19 O Carugo (3767_CR18) 2007; 40 S Veretnik (3767_CR3) 2006 MG Rossman (3767_CR2) 1974; 85 A Andreeva (3767_CR5) 2004; 32 TA Holland (3767_CR8) 2006; 361 AG Murzin (3767_CR11) 1995; 247 7937738 - Proteins. 1994 Jul;19(3):256-68 17456745 - Protein Sci. 2007 May;16(5):947-55 7723011 - J Mol Biol. 1995 Apr 7;247(4):536-40 17135200 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D291-7 15147847 - J Mol Biol. 2004 Jun 4;339(3):647-78 9309224 - Structure. 1997 Aug 15;5(8):1093-108 12560490 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Feb 1;31(3):944-52 14681400 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D226-9 12584135 - Bioinformatics. 2003 Feb 12;19(3):429-30 8710828 - Proteins. 1995 Nov;23(3):356-69 10592235 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42 9521098 - Protein Sci. 1998 Feb;7(2):233-42 16863650 - J Mol Biol. 2006 Aug 18;361(3):562-90 18502776 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jul 1;36(Web Server issue):W239-45 4365123 - J Mol Biol. 1974 May 5;85(1):177-81 4351801 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Mar;70(3):697-701 |
| References_xml | – start-page: 125 volume-title: Computational Methods for Protein Structure Prediction and Modeling year: 2006 ident: 3767_CR3 – start-page: 485 volume-title: In Genny Gu and Philip Bourne Structural Bioinformatics year: 2009 ident: 3767_CR6 – volume: 5 start-page: 1093 year: 1997 ident: 3767_CR10 publication-title: Structure doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00260-8 – volume: 32 start-page: D226 year: 2004 ident: 3767_CR5 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh039 – volume: 36 start-page: W239 year: 2008 ident: 3767_CR17 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn326 – volume: 361 start-page: 562 year: 2006 ident: 3767_CR8 publication-title: J Mol Biol doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.05.060 – volume: 31 start-page: 944 year: 2003 ident: 3767_CR13 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg189 – volume: 7 start-page: 233 year: 1998 ident: 3767_CR9 publication-title: Protein Sci doi: 10.1002/pro.5560070202 – volume: 85 start-page: 177 year: 1974 ident: 3767_CR2 publication-title: J Mol Biol doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90136-3 – volume: 16 start-page: 947 year: 2007 ident: 3767_CR15 publication-title: Protein Sci doi: 10.1110/ps.062597307 – volume: 70 start-page: 697 year: 1973 ident: 3767_CR1 publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.3.697 – volume: 35 start-page: D291 year: 2007 ident: 3767_CR4 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl959 – volume: 247 start-page: 536 year: 1995 ident: 3767_CR11 publication-title: J Mol Biol – volume: 40 start-page: 778 year: 2007 ident: 3767_CR18 publication-title: Journal of Applied Crystallography doi: 10.1107/S0021889807023874 – volume: 19 start-page: 256 year: 1994 ident: 3767_CR14 publication-title: Proteins doi: 10.1002/prot.340190309 – volume: 28 start-page: 235 year: 2000 ident: 3767_CR19 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 – volume: 19 start-page: 429 year: 2003 ident: 3767_CR12 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg006 – volume: 339 start-page: 647 year: 2004 ident: 3767_CR7 publication-title: J Mol Biol doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.053 – volume: 23 start-page: 356 year: 1995 ident: 3767_CR16 publication-title: Proteins doi: 10.1002/prot.340230309 – reference: 10592235 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42 – reference: 7937738 - Proteins. 1994 Jul;19(3):256-68 – reference: 17456745 - Protein Sci. 2007 May;16(5):947-55 – reference: 4351801 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Mar;70(3):697-701 – reference: 12560490 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Feb 1;31(3):944-52 – reference: 9521098 - Protein Sci. 1998 Feb;7(2):233-42 – reference: 15147847 - J Mol Biol. 2004 Jun 4;339(3):647-78 – reference: 4365123 - J Mol Biol. 1974 May 5;85(1):177-81 – reference: 7723011 - J Mol Biol. 1995 Apr 7;247(4):536-40 – reference: 12584135 - Bioinformatics. 2003 Feb 12;19(3):429-30 – reference: 18502776 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jul 1;36(Web Server issue):W239-45 – reference: 8710828 - Proteins. 1995 Nov;23(3):356-69 – reference: 9309224 - Structure. 1997 Aug 15;5(8):1093-108 – reference: 17135200 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D291-7 – reference: 14681400 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D226-9 – reference: 16863650 - J Mol Biol. 2006 Aug 18;361(3):562-90 |
| SSID | ssj0017805 |
| Score | 2.047362 |
| Snippet | Background
Partitioning of a protein into structural components, known as domains, is an important initial step in protein classification and for functional... Partitioning of a protein into structural components, known as domains, is an important initial step in protein classification and for functional and... Background Partitioning of a protein into structural components, known as domains, is an important initial step in protein classification and for functional... Abstract Background Partitioning of a protein into structural components, known as domains, is an important initial step in protein classification and for... |
| SourceID | doaj unpaywall pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 310 |
| SubjectTerms | Algorithms Applications software Bioinformatics Biomedical and Life Sciences Computational Biology/Bioinformatics Computer Appl. in Life Sciences Databases, Protein Genetic algorithms Life Sciences Microarrays Models, Molecular Protein Conformation Proteins Proteins - chemistry Software Structure |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9QwEA9yIOqD-G31lCCCeFC2u22T1rdTPE5BH9SDewvJJNkr9Nrluovsv-Bf7Uy_3Crsvfi4zWzTZH5NZpqZ3zD2GoQAKSWEfqEhTBBDoTZUMkws8pQ-6UP7TffLV3F6lnw-T893Sn1RTFhHD9xN3AykAO0cWiGZSWAOubcShDcu0sRz0qb5Rlk-OFP9-QEx9bd5RXIeolOTDgeUmZiN11oCP8qc3dmQWt7-f1fnne3p79DJ8fz0Dru1qVZ6-1OX5c4WdXKP3e1tS37cjek-u-GqB-xmV21y-5D9slSdk0pbNO-45uu6LjmarNwWzarUlO7EbX2pi4qjQV0su-Q3brZ8CDrkHdns5sqFtPlZrstlfVWsLy4brivb3gzqP5S0vPbYDwyd7tz2ETs7-fjjw2nYl2IIQcRiHeY-Ii869hZw6A4SKayWqYkW1lsnfBYZg0tn7pNEmsjMTZprdHZsFMs41qj9x-ygqiv3lHHjY4dmAXiR-iQmiyH1qUVDwzuYW5gHbDboQ0HPU07lMkrV-iuZUKRBRRrEnwo1GLC34z9WHUfHHtn3pOJRjti12wuIOdVjTl2HuYC9IoAo4s-oKEBnqTdNoz59_6aO0aXLI2J9C9ibXsjX-Pyg-3wHnAWi3JpIHk4k8QWHSTMfcKioiaLiKldvGkVUlgkF6u4RSVL0iEUaB-xJh9xx6As65I1FHjA5wfRkbqYtVXHRMpCjly6zGLs9GtCv-qWv2TPzR-P7ca2anv0PNT1nt7tYDxFG-SE7QPS7F2hCrs3LdrX4DQ5-bCs priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Springer Nature Link OA Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3di9QwEA9yIuqD-G31lCCCeFCu3bZJ69t5eJyCPqgH9xaSSbK30GuX6y6y_4J_tTP9cquy4uNupkmbmWRmMpPfMPYKhAApJYR-piFMUYZCbahkmJgVGR3pQ3um--mzOD1LP55n5_15B92F2Y7fx7k4jHHzDNEtyVq4PbpLdR1VlGjDsuJ4jBcQMv8QhPzLUxOl02Lz_7kDb6mg39MjxxjpbXZzXS315rsuyy01dHKX3entR37UMfweu-aq--xGV1Fy84D9sFSBk8pXNG-55qu6LjmapdwummWp6UoTt_WlXlQcjebFvLvgxs2GD4mFvAOUXV-5kBSc5bqc11eL1cVlw3Vl286g_gU7y2uP48Aw6Fa3D9nZyftvx6dhX24hBJGIVVj4iDzlxFvAT3eQSmG1zEw0s9464fPIGNweC5-m0kQmNlmh0aGxUSKTRCOHH7G9qq7cE8aNTxyqfvAi82lCVkHmM4vGhHcQW4gDdjjwQ0GPRU4lMUrV-iS5UMRBRRzEnwo5GLA34xPLDodjB-07YvFIRwja7R8oWKpfkAqkAO0ckucmhRgKbyUIb1ykCT8nD9hLEhBFGBkVJeHM9bpp1IevX9QRum1FRMhuAXvdE_ka3x90f6cBZ4FgtSaU-xNKXMQwaeaDHCpqosy3ytXrRhFcZUrJuDtI0gy9XpElAXvcSe746TMK5CaiCJicyPRkbqYt1eKiRRlHT1zmCQ57MEi_6re3ZsfMH4zr459sevo_PT9jt7q8DRFGxT7bQyl3z9EcXJkX7U7wEziXWAk priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature – databaseName: Unpaywall dbid: UNPAY link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9NAEF-OHqI--H0aPWURQTxImzbJJvGtiscpeBxq4Xxa9rMXTJPatEj9E_yrnclHbU6pCD4mO8k205nZmd2Z3xDyTDGmoihSrh0J5QYgQ66Q2DKMjZIQt_RVtaf7_pSdTIJ35-H5Hjlra2HkTMm0aEBDEai4v12GntVVDthFwSwGc21rpY_ZYAhG1oXwJaxg-bDmap-F4J33yP7k9Gz8uSoyakja08o_PNZZnSoQ_99N9dZadTmPcnOYep1cXeVzsf4msmxrvTq-Sb62X1qnqXzpr5ayr75fAoH8n6y4RW40zi0d19J4m-yZ_A65Ure7XN8lPzS2B8XeGuVLKuiyKDIK01KdlvNMYL0V1cVMpDkFjz6d1tV3VK5pm_VIa7Tb1cK4uPpqKrJpsUiXF7OSilxXL1PFL0xcWliYR7WTbr32Hpkcv_n0-sRtekG4ivls6SbWwzDet1oBA4wKIqZFFEpvpK02zMaelGC7ExsEkfTkUIaJgGhLe37k-wLE74D08iI3DwiV1jfglyjLQhv46LKENtTg6VijhloNHTJoZYCrBigd-3VkvAqYYsaRwxw5DJccOOyQF5sn5jVIyA7aVyhWGzqE965uFIspb6wFVxFTwhggj2WghiqxOlLMSuMJBPeJHfIUhZIjgEeOGUJTsSpL_vbjBz6GmDLxEHbOIc8bIlvA71eiKbgALiDmV4fysEMJFkZ1hmkr-xyHMC0vN8Wq5IilGWCm8A6SIISQnIW-Q-7X2rL59BGeMvsscUjU0aMOb7ojeXpRQaCPYtyyhGmPWo3jje0td3D-aKOTf_2bHv4L8SNyrU4qYa6XHJIeSLl5DL7qUj5pzM9PaeuPzg priority: 102 providerName: Unpaywall |
| Title | dConsensus: a tool for displaying domain assignments by multiple structure-based algorithms and for construction of a consensus assignment |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2105-11-310 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20529369 https://www.proquest.com/docview/733641410 https://www.proquest.com/docview/745716653 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC2897830 https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/1471-2105-11-310 https://doaj.org/article/c76caee3108b4c1c9fd7c6fbe0a15648 |
| UnpaywallVersion | publishedVersion |
| Volume | 11 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVADU databaseName: BioMedCentral customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: RBZ dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/ providerName: BioMedCentral – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 20000701 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVEBS databaseName: EBSCOhost Academic Search Ultimate customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: ABDBF dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn providerName: EBSCOhost – providerCode: PRVEBS databaseName: Inspec with Full Text customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: ADMLS dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ebsco.com/products/research-databases/inspec-full-text providerName: EBSCOhost – providerCode: PRVBFR databaseName: Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: DIK dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com providerName: Flying Publisher – providerCode: PRVFQY databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: GX1 dateStart: 0 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVAQN databaseName: PubMed Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: RPM dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ providerName: National Library of Medicine – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: 8FG dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVFZP databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 20250131 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: M48 dateStart: 20000701 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://journals.scholarsportal.info providerName: Scholars Portal – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: Springer Nature HAS Fully OA customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: AAJSJ dateStart: 20001201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.springernature.com providerName: Springer Nature – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: Springer Nature Link OA Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: C6C dateStart: 20000112 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.springeropen.com/ providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1tb9MwELb2IgR8QLxTGJWFEIhJYUmT2AkSQl21MiqtmjYqdZ8sx467SlnSNa2gf4FfzV2adA1M3ZdWja927Duf7-zzc4S8V4wpzrmyTEsqywMZsmSEKcNYK_RxS18Ve7onfXY88HpDf7hFqtsl5QDmt7p2mE9qME0-_75efIMJ_7WY8AE7cEDBWuC6-AUkn2N_mFxbmFYKj1_LHBvbZBeWrhBzO5x4N8cMCOhfXD8qK6jOMW-ptLZuFfD-_yvxtVXs3wjL1THrQ3J_nk7k4pdMkrWVrPuYPCpNUNpeyswTshWnT8m9ZVLKxTPyR2MST8yAkX-hks6yLKFg2VI9zieJxFtRVGdXcpxSsLvHo-UdORotaBWbSJeYtPNpbOEaqalMRjBQs8urnMpUF5Wp7Aa5lmYG2lFVo2vVPieD7tHPzrFVZmywFHPZzAqNjc62a7SCrsfK40xL7kd2SxsdMxPYUQQaNjSexyM7ciI_lOATadvlritBSF6QnTRL41eERsaNwXpQhvnGc9Gw8I2vwR4xsXK0chrkoOKHUCWcOWbVSETh1gRMIAcFchB-CuBgg3xa_WOyhPLYQHuILF7RIQh38SCbjkQ5p4XiTMk4BvIg8pSjQqO5YiaKbYkQPEGDvEMBEQizkWIcz0jO81z8OD8TbfD8QhvB4RrkY0lkMnh_JctrETAKiMxVo9yrUYIeULViWsmhwCIMnkvjbJ4LRLz0MJ53A4nng-PMfLdBXi4ld9X1Fp4FuyxsEF6T6drY1EvS8WUBVA7OPA9caHa_kn5RTfANI7-_mh93sun13X1-Qx60wA7FQHvH3yM7INvxW7AjZ1GTbPMhh8-g-71Jdtvt3nkPvg-P-qdn8LTDOs1ih6ZZ6AwoGfRP2xd_AXRwdqw |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3db9MwELemTWjwgPgmMMBCSIhJ0dImsRPeCmLqyrYHtkl7s_zZVcqSqmmF-i_wV3OXLxpARTwmvtiJ73y-y51_R8g7zZjmnGvfDaX2I5AhXyosGcaGaYy_9HX1T_fsnI2vosl1fL1Dhu1ZmCrbvQ1JVpq6WtYJOxqAGvXBQYkr4D08VbWHKVawGPdGo8nFpIsdIEp_G5D8y3O9DajC6f9TG29sR7-nSnbx0ntkf5XP5fq7zLKNLen4Abnf2JJ0VDP_Idmx-SNyp64uuX5MfhisxomlLMqPVNJlUWQUTFRqZuU8k3i8iZriVs5yCgb0bFofdqNqTdskQ1qDy64W1sfNzlCZTYvFbHlzW1KZm6ozXfyCoKWFg3F0O-hGt0_I1fGXy89jvym94GsWsqWfugC95tAZDZ9udcSZkTxWwdA4Y5lLAqVAVaYuirgK1EDFqQTnxgQhD0MJ3H5KdvMit88JVS60YAZox2IXhWghxC42YFg4qwdGDzxy1PJD6AaXHMtjZKLyTxImkIMCOQiXAjjokQ_dE_Mak2ML7SdkcUeHaNrVjWIxFc3iFJozLa0F8kRFeqBTZ7hmTtlAIpZO4pG3KCAC8TJyTMiZylVZipOLb2IELlwaIMqbR943RK6A99eyOd8As4AQWz3Kgx4lLGjda6atHApswiy43BarUiB0ZYSJuVtIohg8YBaHHnlWS2736UMM6oYs9QjvyXRvbvot-eymQhwHr5wnIQx72Eq_aFRduWXmD7v18U82vfifnt-Q_fHl2ak4PTn_-pLcrfM5mB-kB2QXJN6-AjNxqV43euEnRN9gYg |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Zj9MwELbQIq4HxE1gAQshIVaKmjSJnfC2FKpdjhUCVto3y2e3Ujapmlaof4FfzUwuGkBFPLae2IlnPIc9_oaQF5oxzTnXvhtL7ccgQ75UWDKMjbMEt_R1vaf76YQdncbvz5KzdsOt6rLduyPJ5k4DojQVq9HCuGaJp2wUgkr1IVhJahA-vGF1OQbbhhUMJmzSnyIgXn93NPmXpwamqEbs_1Mvbxmm35Mm-5PTG-TauljIzXeZ51vGaXqL3Gy9SnrYiMFtcskWd8iVps7k5i75YbAuJxa1qF5TSVdlmVNwVqmZV4tc4kUnasoLOS8ouNLzWXPtjaoN7dINaQMzu15aH82eoTKflcv56vyiorIwdWe6_AVGS0sH4-hu0K1u75HT6btvkyO_LcLgaxaxlZ-5AOPnyBkNn251zJmRPFHB2DhjmUsDpUBpZi6OuQpUqJJMQphjgohHkQS-3yd7RVnYh4QqF1lwCLRjiYsj9BUSlxhwMZzVodGhR0YdP4RuEcqxUEYu6kglZQI5KJCD8FMABz3yqn9i0aBz7KB9gyzu6RBXu_6jXM5Eu0yF5kxLa4E8VbEOdeYM18wpG0hE1Uk98hwFRCByRoGpOTO5ripx_PWLOIRgLgsQ780jL1siV8L7a9nedIBZQLCtAeX-gBKWth40004OBTZhPlxhy3UlEMQyxhTdHSRxArEwSyKPPGgkt__0MR7vRizzCB_I9GBuhi3F_LzGHof4nKcRDHvQSb9olV61Y-YP-vXxTzY9-p-en5Grn99Oxcfjkw-PyfUmsYP5QbZP9kDg7RPwF1fqaa0UfgKuEGM_ |
| linkToUnpaywall | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9NAEF-OHqI--H0aPWURQTxImzbJJvGtiscpeBxq4Xxa9rMXTJPatEj9E_yrnclHbU6pCD4mO8k205nZmd2Z3xDyTDGmoihSrh0J5QYgQ66Q2DKMjZIQt_RVtaf7_pSdTIJ35-H5Hjlra2HkTMm0aEBDEai4v12GntVVDthFwSwGc21rpY_ZYAhG1oXwJaxg-bDmap-F4J33yP7k9Gz8uSoyakja08o_PNZZnSoQ_99N9dZadTmPcnOYep1cXeVzsf4msmxrvTq-Sb62X1qnqXzpr5ayr75fAoH8n6y4RW40zi0d19J4m-yZ_A65Ure7XN8lPzS2B8XeGuVLKuiyKDIK01KdlvNMYL0V1cVMpDkFjz6d1tV3VK5pm_VIa7Tb1cK4uPpqKrJpsUiXF7OSilxXL1PFL0xcWliYR7WTbr32Hpkcv_n0-sRtekG4ivls6SbWwzDet1oBA4wKIqZFFEpvpK02zMaelGC7ExsEkfTkUIaJgGhLe37k-wLE74D08iI3DwiV1jfglyjLQhv46LKENtTg6VijhloNHTJoZYCrBigd-3VkvAqYYsaRwxw5DJccOOyQF5sn5jVIyA7aVyhWGzqE965uFIspb6wFVxFTwhggj2WghiqxOlLMSuMJBPeJHfIUhZIjgEeOGUJTsSpL_vbjBz6GmDLxEHbOIc8bIlvA71eiKbgALiDmV4fysEMJFkZ1hmkr-xyHMC0vN8Wq5IilGWCm8A6SIISQnIW-Q-7X2rL59BGeMvsscUjU0aMOb7ojeXpRQaCPYtyyhGmPWo3jje0td3D-aKOTf_2bHv4L8SNyrU4qYa6XHJIeSLl5DL7qUj5pzM9PaeuPzg |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=dConsensus%3A+a+tool+for+displaying+domain+assignments+by+multiple+structure-based+algorithms+and+for+construction+of+a+consensus+assignment&rft.jtitle=BMC+bioinformatics&rft.au=Alden%2C+Kieran&rft.au=Veretnik%2C+Stella&rft.au=Bourne%2C+Philip+E&rft.date=2010-06-09&rft.issn=1471-2105&rft.eissn=1471-2105&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=310&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1471-2105-11-310&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |