The “double eights mask brace” improves the fit and protection of a basic surgical mask amidst COVID‐19 pandemic

AbstractStudy objectiveThe COVID‐19 pandemic has resulted in widespread shortages of personal protective equipment, including N95 respirators. Although basic surgical facemasks are more commonly available, their efficacy is limited due primarily to their poor face seal. This pilot study examined the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open Vol. 2; no. 1; p. e12335
Main Authors Runde, Daniel P., MD, MME, Harland, Karisa K., PhD, MPH, Van Heukelom, Paul, MD, Faine, Brett, PharmD, MS, O'Shaughnessy, Patrick, PhD, Mohr, Nicholas M., MD, MS
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.02.2021
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2688-1152
2688-1152
DOI10.1002/emp2.12335

Cover

More Information
Summary:AbstractStudy objectiveThe COVID‐19 pandemic has resulted in widespread shortages of personal protective equipment, including N95 respirators. Although basic surgical facemasks are more commonly available, their efficacy is limited due primarily to their poor face seal. This pilot study examined the impact of a rubber band mask brace on a basic surgical mask, as determined by quantitative fit testing. MethodsSubjects wearing a basic surgical facemask and the rubber band mask brace underwent quantitative fit testing using machinery designed to certify N95 mask fit. Subjects were tested with the brace anchored behind their ears, with a paperclip behind the head, and on the side knobs of their face shields. The primary outcome measure was whether the subject passed the quantitative fit test at or above the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)‐verified standard for N95 masks. ResultsSubjects (n = 11) were 54.5% female, with a median height of 70 inches (interquartile range [IQR] = 68–74), weight of 170 pounds (IQR = 145–215), and body mass index (BMI) of 24.6 (IQR = 22.2–27.2), and encompassing 5 distinct N95 mask fit types. We found that 45%, 100%, and 100% of subjects passed the quantitative fit test when the brace was anchored behind the ears, with a paperclip and on a face shield, respectively. ConclusionOf the 11 subjects included in the analysis, across a range of body habitus and N95 mask fit types, all passed the quantitative fit test when the mask brace was anchored on either face shield or with a paperclip. This data suggests that although the brace does not create an N95 equivalent in terms of filtration, it would offer improved protection from airborne viruses when worn with a basic surgical mask.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Supervising Editor: Michael Blaivas, MD, MBA.
Funding and support: By JACEP Open policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist.
ISSN:2688-1152
2688-1152
DOI:10.1002/emp2.12335