Multisystemic therapy project in Sweden: what factors affect the tendency of social workers to refer subjects to the research project?

This article examines some of the factors that may have affected the tendency for social workers to refer adolescents to a randomised controlled study of multisystemic therapy (MST). If we are to improve integration between researchers and the clinical setting in the future, it is important to consi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of social welfare Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. 358 - 366
Main Authors Gustle, Lars-Henry, Hansson, Kjell, Sundell, Knut, Andrée-Löfholm, Cecilia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1369-6866
1468-2397
1468-2397
DOI10.1111/j.1468-2397.2007.00491.x

Cover

More Information
Summary:This article examines some of the factors that may have affected the tendency for social workers to refer adolescents to a randomised controlled study of multisystemic therapy (MST). If we are to improve integration between researchers and the clinical setting in the future, it is important to consider those factors that affect implementation of research projects and evidence‐based treatment methods. Evidence‐based methods that lack the support of clinicians will have problems surviving in clinical practice. In the present study, we found that social workers’ treatment ideology was associated with referral rate. Social workers who sympathised with the ideology on which MST is based referred patients to the project to a greater extent. Moreover, we found that the perception of a good work climate and good social support correlated positively with the referral rate from the unit. The results suggest that when implementing evidence‐based methods, or research projects on treatment methods, researchers should consider whether the method is consistent with the current treatment ideology within the unit. Working conditions in the unit should also be considered.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-S8DQ4DLX-V
ArticleID:IJSW491
istex:40535B3E65975C8687F80006187060FDDA45D407
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1369-6866
1468-2397
1468-2397
DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2007.00491.x