Exploring psychological responses to genetic testing for Lynch Syndrome within the family context

Objective Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family‐centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and exten...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsycho-oncology (Chichester, England) Vol. 23; no. 11; pp. 1292 - 1299
Main Authors Eliezer, Dina, Hadley, Donald W., Koehly, Laura M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1057-9249
1099-1611
1099-1611
DOI10.1002/pon.3551

Cover

Abstract Objective Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family‐centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and extended family members shape responses to genetic testing. Methods Individuals at risk of carrying a mutation associated with an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome (Lynch syndrome) received genetic testing. Six months after receiving their results, participants reported on cancer distress, cancer worry, and depressive symptoms. Results Among mutation carriers for Lynch syndrome, the higher the proportion of carriers in their immediate family, the less cancer worry and distress they reported. In contrast, mutation carriers and non‐carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their immediate family and mutation carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their extended family were at elevated risk for clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms. Conclusion Personal test results alone are not highly predictive of psychological outcomes. Instead, the interaction between personal and family test results, or in some cases, family test results alone, predict key psychological outcomes. The current research has important implications for genetic counseling and intervention efforts. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
AbstractList Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family-centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and extended family members shape responses to genetic testing.OBJECTIVEGenetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family-centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and extended family members shape responses to genetic testing.Individuals at risk of carrying a mutation associated with an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome (Lynch syndrome) received genetic testing. Six months after receiving their results, participants reported on cancer distress, cancer worry, and depressive symptoms.METHODSIndividuals at risk of carrying a mutation associated with an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome (Lynch syndrome) received genetic testing. Six months after receiving their results, participants reported on cancer distress, cancer worry, and depressive symptoms.Among mutation carriers for Lynch syndrome, the higher the proportion of carriers in their immediate family, the less cancer worry and distress they reported. In contrast, mutation carriers and non-carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their immediate family and mutation carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their extended family were at elevated risk for clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms.RESULTSAmong mutation carriers for Lynch syndrome, the higher the proportion of carriers in their immediate family, the less cancer worry and distress they reported. In contrast, mutation carriers and non-carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their immediate family and mutation carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their extended family were at elevated risk for clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms.Personal test results alone are not highly predictive of psychological outcomes. Instead, the interaction between personal and family test results, or in some cases, family test results alone, predict key psychological outcomes. The current research has important implications for genetic counseling and intervention efforts. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.CONCLUSIONPersonal test results alone are not highly predictive of psychological outcomes. Instead, the interaction between personal and family test results, or in some cases, family test results alone, predict key psychological outcomes. The current research has important implications for genetic counseling and intervention efforts. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family-centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and extended family members shape responses to genetic testing. Individuals at risk of carrying a mutation associated with an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome (Lynch syndrome) received genetic testing. Six months after receiving their results, participants reported on cancer distress, cancer worry, and depressive symptoms. Among mutation carriers for Lynch syndrome, the higher the proportion of carriers in their immediate family, the less cancer worry and distress they reported. In contrast, mutation carriers and non-carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their immediate family and mutation carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their extended family were at elevated risk for clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms. Personal test results alone are not highly predictive of psychological outcomes. Instead, the interaction between personal and family test results, or in some cases, family test results alone, predict key psychological outcomes. The current research has important implications for genetic counseling and intervention efforts. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Objective Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family-centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and extended family members shape responses to genetic testing. Methods Individuals at risk of carrying a mutation associated with an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome (Lynch syndrome) received genetic testing. Six months after receiving their results, participants reported on cancer distress, cancer worry, and depressive symptoms. Results Among mutation carriers for Lynch syndrome, the higher the proportion of carriers in their immediate family, the less cancer worry and distress they reported. In contrast, mutation carriers and non-carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their immediate family and mutation carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their extended family were at elevated risk for clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms. Conclusion Personal test results alone are not highly predictive of psychological outcomes. Instead, the interaction between personal and family test results, or in some cases, family test results alone, predict key psychological outcomes. The current research has important implications for genetic counseling and intervention efforts. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Objective Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family‐centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and extended family members shape responses to genetic testing. Methods Individuals at risk of carrying a mutation associated with an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome (Lynch syndrome) received genetic testing. Six months after receiving their results, participants reported on cancer distress, cancer worry, and depressive symptoms. Results Among mutation carriers for Lynch syndrome, the higher the proportion of carriers in their immediate family, the less cancer worry and distress they reported. In contrast, mutation carriers and non‐carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their immediate family and mutation carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their extended family were at elevated risk for clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms. Conclusion Personal test results alone are not highly predictive of psychological outcomes. Instead, the interaction between personal and family test results, or in some cases, family test results alone, predict key psychological outcomes. The current research has important implications for genetic counseling and intervention efforts. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family-centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and extended family members shape responses to genetic testing. Individuals at risk of carrying a mutation associated with an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome (Lynch syndrome) received genetic testing. Six months after receiving their results, participants reported on cancer distress, cancer worry, and depressive symptoms. Among mutation carriers for Lynch syndrome, the higher the proportion of carriers in their immediate family, the less cancer worry and distress they reported. In contrast, mutation carriers and non-carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their immediate family and mutation carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their extended family were at elevated risk for clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms. Personal test results alone are not highly predictive of psychological outcomes. Instead, the interaction between personal and family test results, or in some cases, family test results alone, predict key psychological outcomes. The current research has important implications for genetic counseling and intervention efforts. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Author Eliezer, Dina
Hadley, Donald W.
Koehly, Laura M.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dina
  surname: Eliezer
  fullname: Eliezer, Dina
  organization: National Human Genome Research Institute, MD, Bethesda, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Donald W.
  surname: Hadley
  fullname: Hadley, Donald W.
  organization: National Human Genome Research Institute, MD, Bethesda, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Laura M.
  surname: Koehly
  fullname: Koehly, Laura M.
  email: Correspondence to:National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. , koehlyl@mail.nih.gov
  organization: National Human Genome Research Institute, MD, Bethesda, USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24872228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqN0l1rFDEUBuBBKvZDwV8gAW-8mTUfk2RzI8hSa2VppSp6FzLZzE5qNtkmWdv5982w7WpFoVcJ5MlLzsk5rPZ88KaqXiI4QRDit-vgJ4RS9KQ6QFCIGjGE9sY95bXAjdivDlO6hLBgwZ5V-7iZcozx9KBSxzdrF6L1S7BOg-6DC0urlQPRpJKaTAI5gKXxJlsNskl5pF2IYD543YMvg1_EsDLg2ubeepB7Azq1sm4AOvhsbvLz6mmnXDIv7taj6tuH46-zj_X8_OR09n5ea4YwqjsBuwVsSKdFQ3CL2nbBBWqFMbSjrEOIcNKJljGMDUaULhRtNcOcE00MbqfkqHq3zV1v2pVZaONzVE6uo12pOMigrHx44m0vl-GXbDCcCo5KwJu7gBiuNqVSubJJG-eUN2GTJGJN03DSsOkjKBFCwNL5R9CSyykmuNDXf9HLsIm-NK0ojJmgnDVFvfqzzl2B939awGQLdAwpRdNJbbPKNoxlWycRlOPQyPK9chya30_cXbjP_Aett_TaOjP818nP52cPvU1lFnZexZ-SccKp_H52IvnFhUAz-kn-ILcvP9_R
CODEN POJCEE
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19031603
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrc3878
crossref_primary_10_1089_jayao_2021_0184
crossref_primary_10_1017_nws_2020_13
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_021_09086_8
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v23_i28_5041
Cites_doi 10.1002/1096-8628(20010101)98:1<15::AID-AJMG1014>3.0.CO;2-0
10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.265
10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103532
10.1136/bmj.a2338
10.1016/S0016-5085(00)70168-5
10.1037/0022-006X.70.3.784
10.1002/pon.933
10.1080/10410236.2011.558338
10.1001/archinte.163.5.573
10.1016/0378-8733(95)00256-1
10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f69dbb
10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.100
10.1016/j.cgh.2006.01.002
10.1002/ajmg.c.10009
10.1136/bmj.316.7132.693
10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.899
10.1002/pon.1062
10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01104.x
10.1136/jmg.38.8.519
10.1002/ajmg.c.10010
10.1207/S15327027HC1502_3
10.1002/pon.1338
10.1002/cncr.20363
10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456
10.1093/oso/9780195120660.001.0001
10.1002/ajmg.a.10926
10.1177/1090198105278751
10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200532
10.1002/ajmg.1320420417
10.1200/JCO.1994.12.4.843
10.1086/228667
10.1177/0265407598155001
10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.011
10.1007/s10689-013-9628-9
10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004
10.1177/014662167700100306
10.1001/jama.296.12.1507
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Nov 2014
Copyright_xml – notice: Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
– notice: Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Nov 2014
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QJ
ASE
FPQ
K6X
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
8FD
FR3
P64
RC3
5PM
DOI 10.1002/pon.3551
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
British Nursing Index
British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)
British Nursing Index
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
MEDLINE - Academic
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
British Nursing Index
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
MEDLINE - Academic
Genetics Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Technology Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
British Nursing Index
Genetics Abstracts

ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Psychology
EISSN 1099-1611
EndPage 1299
ExternalDocumentID PMC4208971
3492320781
24872228
10_1002_pon_3551
PON3551
ark_67375_WNG_7RR91C5J_X
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Feature
GeographicLocations United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Intramural NIH HHS
  grantid: ZIA HG000059
– fundername: NHGRI NIH HHS
  grantid: F32 HG000165
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
05W
0R~
10A
123
1L6
1OB
1OC
1ZS
29P
31~
33P
36B
3SF
3WU
4.4
4ZD
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABIJN
ABIVO
ABLJU
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACHQT
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
AITYG
AIURR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
C45
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EAD
EAP
EBC
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EPL
EPS
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GLUZI
GNP
GODZA
H.X
HBH
HF~
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HVGLF
HZ~
IX1
J0M
JPC
KBYEO
KQQ
L7B
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
PZZ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
RYL
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TUS
UB1
UDS
V2E
V8K
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIB
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WJL
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
XV2
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAHHS
ACCFJ
AEEZP
AEQDE
AEUQT
AFPWT
AIWBW
AJBDE
RWI
WRC
WUP
WWO
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QJ
ASE
FPQ
K6X
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
8FD
FR3
P64
RC3
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c6121-f90fd043fc9432b1bbd791b9ee5f56f11373f9b6622e2155da5bc62773c3e2b83
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1057-9249
1099-1611
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:14:53 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 09:51:33 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 03:40:17 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 22:56:22 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 12 01:21:36 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:05:51 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:36:53 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:04:10 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:19:27 EST 2025
Sun Sep 21 06:19:52 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Keywords Depression
Family
Oncology
Genetic testing
Lynch Snydrome
Cancer
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c6121-f90fd043fc9432b1bbd791b9ee5f56f11373f9b6622e2155da5bc62773c3e2b83
Notes istex:051EE5E1BF3C6712C9D211994D857811E1EEE152
ArticleID:PON3551
ark:/67375/WNG-7RR91C5J-X
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
OpenAccessLink http://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3551
PMID 24872228
PQID 1622695764
PQPubID 31336
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4208971
proquest_miscellaneous_1644473468
proquest_miscellaneous_1639990249
proquest_miscellaneous_1616475232
proquest_journals_1622695764
pubmed_primary_24872228
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_pon_3551
crossref_primary_10_1002_pon_3551
wiley_primary_10_1002_pon_3551_PON3551
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_7RR91C5J_X
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate November 2014
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2014
  text: November 2014
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Chichester
PublicationTitle Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)
PublicationTitleAlternate Psycho-Oncology
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References Harwood J, Sparks L. Social identity and health: an intergroup communication approach to cancer. Health Commun 2003;15:145-159.
Meiser B. Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature. Psycho-Oncology 2005;14:1060-1074.
Broadstock M, Michie S, Marteau T. Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet: EJHG 2000;8:731-738.
Van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Duivenvoorden HJ, et al. A prospective study of the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC on family relationships. Psycho-Oncology 2007;16(4):320-328.
Marteau TM, Croyle RT. The new genetics: psychological responses to genetic testing. Brit Med J 1998;316:693-696.
Järvinen HJ, Aarnio M, Mustonen H, et al. Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol 2000;118:829-834.
McBride CM, Koehly LM, Sanderson SC, Kaphingst KA. The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annu Rev Public Health 2010;31:89-103.
Lodder L, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW, et al. Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result. Am J Med Genet 2001;98:15-24.
Weil J. Psychosocial Genetic Counseling. Oxford University Press: New York, 2000.
Peterson SK. The role of the family in genetic testing: theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions. Health Educ Behav 2005;32:627-639.
Jenkins MA, Baglietto L, Dowty JG, et al. Cancer risks for mismatch repair gene mutation carriers: a population-based early onset case-family study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:489-498.
Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 1979;41:209-218.
Codori AM, Zawacki KL, Petersen GM, et al. Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer in children: long-term psychological effects. Am J Med Genet Part A 2003;116:117-128.
Hampel H, Stephens JA, Pukkala E, et al. Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset. Gastroenterol 2005;129:415-421.
Huggins M, Bloch M, Wiggins S, et al. Predictive testing for Huntington disease in Canada: adverse effects and unexpected results in those receiving a decreased risk. Am J Med Genet 1992;42:508-515.
Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ 2008;337:a2338.
Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, 1991.
Radloff LS. The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1(3):385-401.
Hadley DW, Ashida S, Jenkins JF, et al. Generation after generation: exploring the psychological impact of providing genetic services through a cascading approach. Genet Med 2010;12:808-815.
Lerman C, Croyle RT, Tercyak KP, Hamann H. Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002;70:784.
Lyons RF, Mickelson KD, Sullivan MJ, Coyne JC. Coping as a communal process. J Soc Pers Relat 1998;15:579-605.
Strang D, Soule SA. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: from hybrid corn to poison pills. Annu Rev Sociol 1998;24:265-290.
Shiloh S, Koehly L, Jenkins J, Martin J, Hadley D. Monitoring coping style moderates emotional reactions to genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study. Psycho-Oncology 2008;17:746-755.
Michie S, Bobrow M, Marteau TM. Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact. J Med Genet 2001;38:519-526.
Aktan-Collan K, Kääriäinen H, Järvinen H, et al. Psychosocial consequences of predictive genetic testing for lynch syndrome and associations to surveillance behaviour in a 7-year follow-up study. Fam Cancer 2013;12:639-646.
Lindor NM, Petersen GM, Hadley DW, et al. Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome. JAMA 2006;296:1507-1517.
Peterson SK, Watts BG, Koehly LM, et al. How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study. Am J Med Genet Part C 2003;119:78-86 Wiley Online Library.
Ersig AL, Hadley DW, Koehly LM. Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: Examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results. Health Communication 2011;26:587-594.
Ashida S, Hadley DW, Vaughn BK, Kuhn NR, Jenkins JF, Koehly LM. The impact of familial environment on depression scores after genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Clin Genet 2009;75:43-49.
Valente TW. Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Soc networks 1996;18(1):69-89.
Hadley DW, Jenkins J, Dimond E, et al. Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:573-582.
Burt RS. Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am J Sociol 1987;92:1287-1335.
Murakami Y, Okamura H, Sugano K, et al. Psychologic distress after disclosure of genetic test results regarding hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2004;101:395-403.
Sorenson JR, Botkin JR. Genetic testing and the family. Am J Med Genet Part C 2003;119:1-2.
Hamann HA, Smith TW, Smith KR, et al. Interpersonal responses among sibling dyads tested for BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations. Health Psychol 2008;27:100-109.
Jemmott JB, Ditto PH, Croyle RT. Judging health status: effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;50(5):899-905.
Smith KR, West JA, Croyle RT, Botkin JR. Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: moderating effect of siblings' test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:385-392.
Lerman C, Daly M, Masny A, Balshem A. Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 1994;12(4):843-850.
Folkman S, Moskowitz JT. Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annu Rev Psychol 2004;55:745-774.
Koehly LM, Peterson SK, Watts BG, Kempf KK, Vernon SW, Gritz ER. A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12:304-313.
2010; 12
2004; 101
2010; 31
2003; 119
1996; 18
1986; 50
2003; 116
1987; 92
2000; 118
2000; 8
2008; 17
1998; 316
2003; 15
2006; 296
2006; 4
1991
1999; 8
2007; 16
2003; 12
1998; 24
2004; 55
1998; 15
2009; 75
2000
2013; 12
2008; 27
2005; 129
1994; 12
1977; 1
2005; 32
2008; 337
2002; 70
2001; 38
2011; 26
1992; 42
1979; 41
2005; 14
2001; 98
2003; 163
e_1_2_8_28_1
e_1_2_8_24_1
e_1_2_8_25_1
e_1_2_8_26_1
e_1_2_8_27_1
Smith KR (e_1_2_8_7_1) 1999; 8
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_4_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
e_1_2_8_9_1
e_1_2_8_8_1
e_1_2_8_20_1
e_1_2_8_21_1
e_1_2_8_22_1
e_1_2_8_23_1
e_1_2_8_41_1
e_1_2_8_17_1
e_1_2_8_18_1
e_1_2_8_39_1
e_1_2_8_19_1
Aiken LS (e_1_2_8_40_1) 1991
e_1_2_8_13_1
e_1_2_8_36_1
e_1_2_8_14_1
e_1_2_8_35_1
e_1_2_8_15_1
e_1_2_8_38_1
e_1_2_8_16_1
e_1_2_8_37_1
Weil J (e_1_2_8_29_1) 2000
Koehly LM (e_1_2_8_30_1) 2003; 12
e_1_2_8_32_1
e_1_2_8_10_1
e_1_2_8_31_1
e_1_2_8_11_1
e_1_2_8_34_1
e_1_2_8_12_1
e_1_2_8_33_1
References_xml – reference: Jenkins MA, Baglietto L, Dowty JG, et al. Cancer risks for mismatch repair gene mutation carriers: a population-based early onset case-family study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:489-498.
– reference: Peterson SK, Watts BG, Koehly LM, et al. How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study. Am J Med Genet Part C 2003;119:78-86 Wiley Online Library.
– reference: Lerman C, Daly M, Masny A, Balshem A. Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 1994;12(4):843-850.
– reference: Peterson SK. The role of the family in genetic testing: theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions. Health Educ Behav 2005;32:627-639.
– reference: Meiser B. Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature. Psycho-Oncology 2005;14:1060-1074.
– reference: Smith KR, West JA, Croyle RT, Botkin JR. Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: moderating effect of siblings' test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:385-392.
– reference: Hamann HA, Smith TW, Smith KR, et al. Interpersonal responses among sibling dyads tested for BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations. Health Psychol 2008;27:100-109.
– reference: Järvinen HJ, Aarnio M, Mustonen H, et al. Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol 2000;118:829-834.
– reference: Van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Duivenvoorden HJ, et al. A prospective study of the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC on family relationships. Psycho-Oncology 2007;16(4):320-328.
– reference: McBride CM, Koehly LM, Sanderson SC, Kaphingst KA. The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annu Rev Public Health 2010;31:89-103.
– reference: Shiloh S, Koehly L, Jenkins J, Martin J, Hadley D. Monitoring coping style moderates emotional reactions to genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study. Psycho-Oncology 2008;17:746-755.
– reference: Radloff LS. The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1(3):385-401.
– reference: Burt RS. Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am J Sociol 1987;92:1287-1335.
– reference: Hadley DW, Ashida S, Jenkins JF, et al. Generation after generation: exploring the psychological impact of providing genetic services through a cascading approach. Genet Med 2010;12:808-815.
– reference: Marteau TM, Croyle RT. The new genetics: psychological responses to genetic testing. Brit Med J 1998;316:693-696.
– reference: Hadley DW, Jenkins J, Dimond E, et al. Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:573-582.
– reference: Ashida S, Hadley DW, Vaughn BK, Kuhn NR, Jenkins JF, Koehly LM. The impact of familial environment on depression scores after genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Clin Genet 2009;75:43-49.
– reference: Weil J. Psychosocial Genetic Counseling. Oxford University Press: New York, 2000.
– reference: Koehly LM, Peterson SK, Watts BG, Kempf KK, Vernon SW, Gritz ER. A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12:304-313.
– reference: Aktan-Collan K, Kääriäinen H, Järvinen H, et al. Psychosocial consequences of predictive genetic testing for lynch syndrome and associations to surveillance behaviour in a 7-year follow-up study. Fam Cancer 2013;12:639-646.
– reference: Harwood J, Sparks L. Social identity and health: an intergroup communication approach to cancer. Health Commun 2003;15:145-159.
– reference: Valente TW. Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Soc networks 1996;18(1):69-89.
– reference: Codori AM, Zawacki KL, Petersen GM, et al. Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer in children: long-term psychological effects. Am J Med Genet Part A 2003;116:117-128.
– reference: Sorenson JR, Botkin JR. Genetic testing and the family. Am J Med Genet Part C 2003;119:1-2.
– reference: Lindor NM, Petersen GM, Hadley DW, et al. Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome. JAMA 2006;296:1507-1517.
– reference: Murakami Y, Okamura H, Sugano K, et al. Psychologic distress after disclosure of genetic test results regarding hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2004;101:395-403.
– reference: Lyons RF, Mickelson KD, Sullivan MJ, Coyne JC. Coping as a communal process. J Soc Pers Relat 1998;15:579-605.
– reference: Huggins M, Bloch M, Wiggins S, et al. Predictive testing for Huntington disease in Canada: adverse effects and unexpected results in those receiving a decreased risk. Am J Med Genet 1992;42:508-515.
– reference: Lodder L, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW, et al. Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result. Am J Med Genet 2001;98:15-24.
– reference: Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ 2008;337:a2338.
– reference: Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, 1991.
– reference: Lerman C, Croyle RT, Tercyak KP, Hamann H. Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002;70:784.
– reference: Folkman S, Moskowitz JT. Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annu Rev Psychol 2004;55:745-774.
– reference: Hampel H, Stephens JA, Pukkala E, et al. Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset. Gastroenterol 2005;129:415-421.
– reference: Broadstock M, Michie S, Marteau T. Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet: EJHG 2000;8:731-738.
– reference: Michie S, Bobrow M, Marteau TM. Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact. J Med Genet 2001;38:519-526.
– reference: Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 1979;41:209-218.
– reference: Ersig AL, Hadley DW, Koehly LM. Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: Examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results. Health Communication 2011;26:587-594.
– reference: Strang D, Soule SA. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: from hybrid corn to poison pills. Annu Rev Sociol 1998;24:265-290.
– reference: Jemmott JB, Ditto PH, Croyle RT. Judging health status: effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;50(5):899-905.
– volume: 129
  start-page: 415
  year: 2005
  end-page: 421
  article-title: Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset
  publication-title: Gastroenterol
– volume: 38
  start-page: 519
  year: 2001
  end-page: 526
  article-title: Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact
  publication-title: J Med Genet
– volume: 15
  start-page: 579
  year: 1998
  end-page: 605
  article-title: Coping as a communal process
  publication-title: J Soc Pers Relat
– volume: 12
  start-page: 304
  year: 2003
  end-page: 313
  article-title: A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
– volume: 8
  start-page: 385
  year: 1999
  end-page: 392
  article-title: Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: moderating effect of siblings' test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
– volume: 92
  start-page: 1287
  year: 1987
  end-page: 1335
  article-title: Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence
  publication-title: Am J Sociol
– volume: 12
  start-page: 843
  issue: 4
  year: 1994
  end-page: 850
  article-title: Attitudes about genetic testing for breast‐ovarian cancer susceptibility
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
– volume: 50
  start-page: 899
  issue: 5
  year: 1986
  end-page: 905
  article-title: Judging health status: effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance
  publication-title: J Pers Soc Psychol
– volume: 4
  start-page: 489
  year: 2006
  end-page: 498
  article-title: Cancer risks for mismatch repair gene mutation carriers: a population‐based early onset case‐family study
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1060
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1074
  article-title: Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature
  publication-title: Psycho‐Oncology
– volume: 32
  start-page: 627
  year: 2005
  end-page: 639
  article-title: The role of the family in genetic testing: theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions
  publication-title: Health Educ Behav
– volume: 98
  start-page: 15
  year: 2001
  end-page: 24
  article-title: Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result
  publication-title: Am J Med Genet
– volume: 70
  start-page: 784
  year: 2002
  article-title: Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications
  publication-title: J Consult Clin Psychol
– year: 2000
– volume: 101
  start-page: 395
  year: 2004
  end-page: 403
  article-title: Psychologic distress after disclosure of genetic test results regarding hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 119
  start-page: 78
  year: 2003
  end-page: 86
  article-title: How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study
  publication-title: Am J Med Genet Part C
– volume: 27
  start-page: 100
  year: 2008
  end-page: 109
  article-title: Interpersonal responses among sibling dyads tested for BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations
  publication-title: Health Psychol
– volume: 296
  start-page: 1507
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1517
  article-title: Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 337
  year: 2008
  article-title: Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 316
  start-page: 693
  year: 1998
  end-page: 696
  article-title: The new genetics: psychological responses to genetic testing
  publication-title: Brit Med J
– volume: 118
  start-page: 829
  year: 2000
  end-page: 834
  article-title: Controlled 15‐year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Gastroenterol
– volume: 18
  start-page: 69
  issue: 1
  year: 1996
  end-page: 89
  article-title: Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations
  publication-title: Soc networks
– volume: 1
  start-page: 385
  issue: 3
  year: 1977
  end-page: 401
  article-title: The CES‐D scale a self‐report depression scale for research in the general population
  publication-title: Appl Psychol Meas
– volume: 75
  start-page: 43
  year: 2009
  end-page: 49
  article-title: The impact of familial environment on depression scores after genetic testing for cancer susceptibility
  publication-title: Clin Genet
– volume: 119
  start-page: 1
  year: 2003
  end-page: 2
  article-title: Genetic testing and the family
  publication-title: Am J Med Genet Part C
– volume: 15
  start-page: 145
  year: 2003
  end-page: 159
  article-title: Social identity and health: an intergroup communication approach to cancer
  publication-title: Health Commun
– volume: 163
  start-page: 573
  year: 2003
  end-page: 582
  article-title: Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
– volume: 12
  start-page: 808
  year: 2010
  end-page: 815
  article-title: Generation after generation: exploring the psychological impact of providing genetic services through a cascading approach
  publication-title: Genet Med
– volume: 8
  start-page: 731
  year: 2000
  end-page: 738
  article-title: Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review
  publication-title: Eur J Hum Genet: EJHG
– volume: 24
  start-page: 265
  year: 1998
  end-page: 290
  article-title: Diffusion in organizations and social movements: from hybrid corn to poison pills
  publication-title: Annu Rev Sociol
– volume: 26
  start-page: 587
  year: 2011
  end-page: 594
  article-title: Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: Examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results
  publication-title: Health Communication
– volume: 116
  start-page: 117
  year: 2003
  end-page: 128
  article-title: Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer in children: long‐term psychological effects
  publication-title: Am J Med Genet Part A
– volume: 12
  start-page: 639
  year: 2013
  end-page: 646
  article-title: Psychosocial consequences of predictive genetic testing for lynch syndrome and associations to surveillance behaviour in a 7‐year follow‐up study
  publication-title: Fam Cancer
– volume: 55
  start-page: 745
  year: 2004
  end-page: 774
  article-title: Coping: Pitfalls and promise
  publication-title: Annu Rev Psychol
– volume: 16
  start-page: 320
  issue: 4
  year: 2007
  end-page: 328
  article-title: A prospective study of the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC on family relationships
  publication-title: Psycho‐Oncology
– volume: 42
  start-page: 508
  year: 1992
  end-page: 515
  article-title: Predictive testing for Huntington disease in Canada: adverse effects and unexpected results in those receiving a decreased risk
  publication-title: Am J Med Genet
– year: 1991
– volume: 41
  start-page: 209
  year: 1979
  end-page: 218
  article-title: Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress
  publication-title: Psychosom Med
– volume: 31
  start-page: 89
  year: 2010
  end-page: 103
  article-title: The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors?
  publication-title: Annu Rev Public Health
– volume: 17
  start-page: 746
  year: 2008
  end-page: 755
  article-title: Monitoring coping style moderates emotional reactions to genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study
  publication-title: Psycho‐Oncology
– ident: e_1_2_8_22_1
  doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(20010101)98:1<15::AID-AJMG1014>3.0.CO;2-0
– ident: e_1_2_8_35_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.265
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103532
– ident: e_1_2_8_32_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2338
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(00)70168-5
– ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
  doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.70.3.784
– volume-title: Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
  year: 1991
  ident: e_1_2_8_40_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
  doi: 10.1002/pon.933
– ident: e_1_2_8_41_1
  doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.558338
– ident: e_1_2_8_36_1
  doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.5.573
– ident: e_1_2_8_33_1
  doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(95)00256-1
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f69dbb
– volume: 8
  start-page: 385
  year: 1999
  ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  article-title: Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: moderating effect of siblings' test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.100
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.01.002
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.10009
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7132.693
– ident: e_1_2_8_25_1
  doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.899
– ident: e_1_2_8_27_1
  doi: 10.1002/pon.1062
– ident: e_1_2_8_18_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01104.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_19_1
  doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.8.519
– ident: e_1_2_8_31_1
  doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.10010
– ident: e_1_2_8_26_1
  doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1502_3
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_1
  doi: 10.1002/pon.1338
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.20363
– ident: e_1_2_8_23_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456
– volume-title: Psychosocial Genetic Counseling
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_8_29_1
  doi: 10.1093/oso/9780195120660.001.0001
– volume: 12
  start-page: 304
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_8_30_1
  article-title: A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
– ident: e_1_2_8_21_1
  doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10926
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
  doi: 10.1177/1090198105278751
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200532
– ident: e_1_2_8_28_1
  doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320420417
– ident: e_1_2_8_38_1
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.4.843
– ident: e_1_2_8_34_1
  doi: 10.1086/228667
– ident: e_1_2_8_24_1
  doi: 10.1177/0265407598155001
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.011
– ident: e_1_2_8_20_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10689-013-9628-9
– ident: e_1_2_8_37_1
  doi: 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004
– ident: e_1_2_8_39_1
  doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
  doi: 10.1001/jama.296.12.1507
SSID ssj0010096
Score 2.14391
Snippet Objective Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family‐centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family...
Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family-centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context...
Objective Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family-centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1292
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anxiety - psychology
Cancer
Carriers
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis - genetics
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis - psychology
Depression
Depression - psychology
Extended family
Family
Family - psychology
Female
Genetic counseling
Genetic disorders
Genetic Predisposition to Disease - psychology
Genetic Testing
Heterozygote
Humans
Lynch Snydrome
Male
Mental depression
Middle Aged
Mutation
Oncology
Psychological aspects
Psychological distress
Public domain
Relatives
Stress, Psychological - psychology
Susceptibility
Young Adult
Title Exploring psychological responses to genetic testing for Lynch Syndrome within the family context
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-7RR91C5J-X/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fpon.3551
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24872228
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1622695764
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1616475232
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1639990249
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1644473468
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4208971
Volume 23
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZQkVAvPMqjgYKMhOCUdh2_kiMqlKqiC1qoWImDZTu2WhVlV7tZifLrmcmLLpQKccohX5TYnvF8Y4-_EPIi16J0XpephuCWCl7aNI-RpzD00XJbOiXwvPPxWB2eiKOpnHZVlXgWptWHGBbc0DOa-Rod3Lrl3i_R0DmMEgRLzHwYVyib_2YyKEcxpObNRqfUKaYYve7sKNvrH1yLRDexU79fRTP_rJa8zGKbMHRwh3ztG9BWn5zvrmq363_8pu34fy28S2537JS-bs3pHrkRqi1y67jbf98im8N8eXGf2KF-j84vT6N00dbdhiWtZxQMFM9J0hrlPAAKJJm-v6j8Kf3UiSVQXAs-qyhQUdqut1AsoIeo8YCcHLz9vH-Ydn9sSD0qkaWxGMVyJHj0heCZY86VumCuCEFGqSJjXPNYOKWyLADXkKWVzqtMa-55yFzOH5KNalaFbUItE95JFj2LSOmslSNugwh5HlWpokzIq370jO_kzPGvGt9MK8ScGWipwe5LyPMBOW8lPK7AvGwMYADYxTmWvGlpvozfGT2ZFGxfHplpQnZ6CzGdty8Ng_aoAjI3Ae8aboOf4uaLrcJshRhUboO0P7sOA3SxQBHH6zBCCM2FyhPyqDXM4aMzyD5xRS8hes1kBwBqia_fqc5OG01xrLIoNPZDY5F_7Sjz8cMYr4__FfiEbALHFO3xzR2yUS9W4SnwuNo9azz2J-MoR4U
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LbxMxELaqVoJeeJTXQgEjIThtG6_t9a44oYoSShJQaEUOlSzba6tV0SZKE4ny65nZFw2UCnHKYb8osT3j-WY8_paQl5kShXWqiBUEt1jwwsRZCDyGpQ-Gm8KmAu87D0dp_0gcTORkjbxp78LU-hBdwQ09o9qv0cGxIL37SzV0BssE0RJSn43qeA4Z0bjTjmJIzqujTqliTDJa5dlestt-cyUWbeC0fr-KaP7ZL3mZx1aBaP82OW6HUPefnO0sF3bH_fhN3fE_x3iH3GoIKn1bW9RdsubLLXJj2BzBb5HNbsu8uEdM18JHZ5d3UjqvW2_9OV1MKdgoXpWkC1T0ACjwZDq4KN0J_dLoJVAsB5-WFNgorUsuFHvoIXDcJ0f77w73-nHz0obYoRhZHPJeKHqCB5cLnlhmbaFyZnPvZZBpYIwrHnKbpknigW7Iwkjr0kQp7rhPbMYfkPVyWvpHhBomnJUsOBaQ1Rkje9x44bMspEUaZERet8unXaNoji_W-KZrLeZEw0g1Tl9EXnTIWa3icQXmVWUBHcDMz7DrTUn9dfReq_E4Z3vyQE8ist2aiG4c_lwzGE-aQ_Im4Le6x-CqeP5iSj9dIgbF2yDzT67DAGPMUcfxOowQQnGRZhF5WFtm96cTSECxqBcRtWKzHQDlxFeflKcnlaw4NlrkCuehMsm_TpT-_GmEn4__Ffic3OwfDgd68GH08QnZBMop6tuc22R9MV_6p0DrFvZZ5b4_AS0lS6M
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZQK1W9QCmv0AJGQnBKu45fyREVllLapVqoWImDZSe2WhVlV9usRPn1zORFF0qFOOWQL0psz3i-scdfCHmRalG4XBexhuAWC17YOA2BxzD0wXJbOCXwvPPRSO2fiIOJnLRVlXgWptGH6Bfc0DPq-RodfFaE3V-ioTMYJQiWkPmsCgVREgnRuJeOYsjN651OqWPMMTrh2UGy2z25FIpWsVe_X8cz_yyXvEpj6zg0vEO-di1oyk_OdxaV28l__Cbu-H9N3CC3W3pKXzf2dJfc8uUmWTtqN-A3yXo_YV7eI7Yv4KOzq_MonTeFt_6CVlMKFooHJWmFeh4ABZZMDy_L_JR-atUSKC4Gn5UUuChtFlwoVtBD2LhPToZvP-_tx-0vG-IcpcjikA1CMRA85JngiWPOFTpjLvNeBqkCY1zzkDmlksQD2ZCFlS5XidY85z5xKX9AVspp6R8RapnInWQhZwE5nbVywK0XPk2DKlSQEXnVjZ7JWz1z_K3GN9MoMScGWmqw-yLyvEfOGg2PazAvawPoAXZ-jjVvWpovo3dGj8cZ25MHZhKR7c5CTOvuF4ZBe1QGqZuAd_W3wVFx98WWfrpADEq3Qd6f3IQBvpihiuNNGCGE5kKlEXnYGGb_0Qmkn7ikFxG9ZLI9AMXEl--UZ6e1qDiWWWQa-6G2yL92lDn-OMLr438FPiNrx2-G5vD96MMWWQe-KZqjnNtkpZov_BPgdJV7WjvvTxvGSlI
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring+psychological+responses+to+genetic+testing+for+Lynch+Syndrome+within+the+family+context&rft.jtitle=Psycho-oncology+%28Chichester%2C+England%29&rft.au=Eliezer%2C+Dina&rft.au=Hadley%2C+Donald+W.&rft.au=Koehly%2C+Laura+M.&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.issn=1057-9249&rft.eissn=1099-1611&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1292&rft.epage=1299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fpon.3551&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F24872228&rft.externalDocID=PMC4208971
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1057-9249&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1057-9249&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1057-9249&client=summon