Exploring psychological responses to genetic testing for Lynch Syndrome within the family context
Objective Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family‐centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and exten...
Saved in:
Published in | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) Vol. 23; no. 11; pp. 1292 - 1299 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.11.2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1057-9249 1099-1611 1099-1611 |
DOI | 10.1002/pon.3551 |
Cover
Abstract | Objective
Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family‐centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and extended family members shape responses to genetic testing.
Methods
Individuals at risk of carrying a mutation associated with an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome (Lynch syndrome) received genetic testing. Six months after receiving their results, participants reported on cancer distress, cancer worry, and depressive symptoms.
Results
Among mutation carriers for Lynch syndrome, the higher the proportion of carriers in their immediate family, the less cancer worry and distress they reported. In contrast, mutation carriers and non‐carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their immediate family and mutation carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their extended family were at elevated risk for clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms.
Conclusion
Personal test results alone are not highly predictive of psychological outcomes. Instead, the interaction between personal and family test results, or in some cases, family test results alone, predict key psychological outcomes. The current research has important implications for genetic counseling and intervention efforts. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family-centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and extended family members shape responses to genetic testing.OBJECTIVEGenetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family-centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and extended family members shape responses to genetic testing.Individuals at risk of carrying a mutation associated with an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome (Lynch syndrome) received genetic testing. Six months after receiving their results, participants reported on cancer distress, cancer worry, and depressive symptoms.METHODSIndividuals at risk of carrying a mutation associated with an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome (Lynch syndrome) received genetic testing. Six months after receiving their results, participants reported on cancer distress, cancer worry, and depressive symptoms.Among mutation carriers for Lynch syndrome, the higher the proportion of carriers in their immediate family, the less cancer worry and distress they reported. In contrast, mutation carriers and non-carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their immediate family and mutation carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their extended family were at elevated risk for clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms.RESULTSAmong mutation carriers for Lynch syndrome, the higher the proportion of carriers in their immediate family, the less cancer worry and distress they reported. In contrast, mutation carriers and non-carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their immediate family and mutation carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their extended family were at elevated risk for clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms.Personal test results alone are not highly predictive of psychological outcomes. Instead, the interaction between personal and family test results, or in some cases, family test results alone, predict key psychological outcomes. The current research has important implications for genetic counseling and intervention efforts. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.CONCLUSIONPersonal test results alone are not highly predictive of psychological outcomes. Instead, the interaction between personal and family test results, or in some cases, family test results alone, predict key psychological outcomes. The current research has important implications for genetic counseling and intervention efforts. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family-centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and extended family members shape responses to genetic testing. Individuals at risk of carrying a mutation associated with an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome (Lynch syndrome) received genetic testing. Six months after receiving their results, participants reported on cancer distress, cancer worry, and depressive symptoms. Among mutation carriers for Lynch syndrome, the higher the proportion of carriers in their immediate family, the less cancer worry and distress they reported. In contrast, mutation carriers and non-carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their immediate family and mutation carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their extended family were at elevated risk for clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms. Personal test results alone are not highly predictive of psychological outcomes. Instead, the interaction between personal and family test results, or in some cases, family test results alone, predict key psychological outcomes. The current research has important implications for genetic counseling and intervention efforts. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Objective Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family-centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and extended family members shape responses to genetic testing. Methods Individuals at risk of carrying a mutation associated with an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome (Lynch syndrome) received genetic testing. Six months after receiving their results, participants reported on cancer distress, cancer worry, and depressive symptoms. Results Among mutation carriers for Lynch syndrome, the higher the proportion of carriers in their immediate family, the less cancer worry and distress they reported. In contrast, mutation carriers and non-carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their immediate family and mutation carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their extended family were at elevated risk for clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms. Conclusion Personal test results alone are not highly predictive of psychological outcomes. Instead, the interaction between personal and family test results, or in some cases, family test results alone, predict key psychological outcomes. The current research has important implications for genetic counseling and intervention efforts. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Objective Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family‐centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and extended family members shape responses to genetic testing. Methods Individuals at risk of carrying a mutation associated with an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome (Lynch syndrome) received genetic testing. Six months after receiving their results, participants reported on cancer distress, cancer worry, and depressive symptoms. Results Among mutation carriers for Lynch syndrome, the higher the proportion of carriers in their immediate family, the less cancer worry and distress they reported. In contrast, mutation carriers and non‐carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their immediate family and mutation carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their extended family were at elevated risk for clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms. Conclusion Personal test results alone are not highly predictive of psychological outcomes. Instead, the interaction between personal and family test results, or in some cases, family test results alone, predict key psychological outcomes. The current research has important implications for genetic counseling and intervention efforts. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family-centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context affects psychological responses to genetic testing. We examine how personal test results and the test results of immediate and extended family members shape responses to genetic testing. Individuals at risk of carrying a mutation associated with an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome (Lynch syndrome) received genetic testing. Six months after receiving their results, participants reported on cancer distress, cancer worry, and depressive symptoms. Among mutation carriers for Lynch syndrome, the higher the proportion of carriers in their immediate family, the less cancer worry and distress they reported. In contrast, mutation carriers and non-carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their immediate family and mutation carriers with a high proportion of carriers in their extended family were at elevated risk for clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms. Personal test results alone are not highly predictive of psychological outcomes. Instead, the interaction between personal and family test results, or in some cases, family test results alone, predict key psychological outcomes. The current research has important implications for genetic counseling and intervention efforts. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. |
Author | Eliezer, Dina Hadley, Donald W. Koehly, Laura M. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Dina surname: Eliezer fullname: Eliezer, Dina organization: National Human Genome Research Institute, MD, Bethesda, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Donald W. surname: Hadley fullname: Hadley, Donald W. organization: National Human Genome Research Institute, MD, Bethesda, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Laura M. surname: Koehly fullname: Koehly, Laura M. email: Correspondence to:National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. , koehlyl@mail.nih.gov organization: National Human Genome Research Institute, MD, Bethesda, USA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24872228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqN0l1rFDEUBuBBKvZDwV8gAW-8mTUfk2RzI8hSa2VppSp6FzLZzE5qNtkmWdv5982w7WpFoVcJ5MlLzsk5rPZ88KaqXiI4QRDit-vgJ4RS9KQ6QFCIGjGE9sY95bXAjdivDlO6hLBgwZ5V-7iZcozx9KBSxzdrF6L1S7BOg-6DC0urlQPRpJKaTAI5gKXxJlsNskl5pF2IYD543YMvg1_EsDLg2ubeepB7Azq1sm4AOvhsbvLz6mmnXDIv7taj6tuH46-zj_X8_OR09n5ea4YwqjsBuwVsSKdFQ3CL2nbBBWqFMbSjrEOIcNKJljGMDUaULhRtNcOcE00MbqfkqHq3zV1v2pVZaONzVE6uo12pOMigrHx44m0vl-GXbDCcCo5KwJu7gBiuNqVSubJJG-eUN2GTJGJN03DSsOkjKBFCwNL5R9CSyykmuNDXf9HLsIm-NK0ojJmgnDVFvfqzzl2B939awGQLdAwpRdNJbbPKNoxlWycRlOPQyPK9chya30_cXbjP_Aett_TaOjP818nP52cPvU1lFnZexZ-SccKp_H52IvnFhUAz-kn-ILcvP9_R |
CODEN | POJCEE |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19031603 crossref_primary_10_1038_nrc3878 crossref_primary_10_1089_jayao_2021_0184 crossref_primary_10_1017_nws_2020_13 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_021_09086_8 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v23_i28_5041 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/1096-8628(20010101)98:1<15::AID-AJMG1014>3.0.CO;2-0 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.265 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103532 10.1136/bmj.a2338 10.1016/S0016-5085(00)70168-5 10.1037/0022-006X.70.3.784 10.1002/pon.933 10.1080/10410236.2011.558338 10.1001/archinte.163.5.573 10.1016/0378-8733(95)00256-1 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f69dbb 10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.100 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.01.002 10.1002/ajmg.c.10009 10.1136/bmj.316.7132.693 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.899 10.1002/pon.1062 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01104.x 10.1136/jmg.38.8.519 10.1002/ajmg.c.10010 10.1207/S15327027HC1502_3 10.1002/pon.1338 10.1002/cncr.20363 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456 10.1093/oso/9780195120660.001.0001 10.1002/ajmg.a.10926 10.1177/1090198105278751 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200532 10.1002/ajmg.1320420417 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.4.843 10.1086/228667 10.1177/0265407598155001 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.011 10.1007/s10689-013-9628-9 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004 10.1177/014662167700100306 10.1001/jama.296.12.1507 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Nov 2014 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. – notice: Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Nov 2014 |
DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QJ ASE FPQ K6X K9. NAPCQ 7X8 8FD FR3 P64 RC3 5PM |
DOI | 10.1002/pon.3551 |
DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) British Nursing Index British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present) British Nursing Index ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium British Nursing Index Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic Genetics Abstracts Engineering Research Database Technology Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic British Nursing Index Genetics Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Psychology |
EISSN | 1099-1611 |
EndPage | 1299 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC4208971 3492320781 24872228 10_1002_pon_3551 PON3551 ark_67375_WNG_7RR91C5J_X |
Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Feature |
GeographicLocations | United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Intramural NIH HHS grantid: ZIA HG000059 – fundername: NHGRI NIH HHS grantid: F32 HG000165 |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA 05W 0R~ 10A 123 1L6 1OB 1OC 1ZS 29P 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 3WU 4.4 4ZD 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAIPD AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABIJN ABIVO ABLJU ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACHQT ACMXC ACPOU ACRPL ACSCC ACUHS ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHMBA AIACR AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE AITYG AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EAD EAP EBC EBD EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN EPL EPS ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GLUZI GNP GODZA H.X HBH HF~ HGLYW HHY HHZ HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M JPC KBYEO KQQ L7B LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ PZZ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 RYL SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TUS UB1 UDS V2E V8K W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIB WIH WIJ WIK WJL WOHZO WOW WQJ WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 XV2 ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAHHS ACCFJ AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AIWBW AJBDE RWI WRC WUP WWO AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QJ ASE FPQ K6X K9. NAPCQ 7X8 8FD FR3 P64 RC3 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c6121-f90fd043fc9432b1bbd791b9ee5f56f11373f9b6622e2155da5bc62773c3e2b83 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 1057-9249 1099-1611 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:14:53 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:51:33 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 03:40:17 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 22:56:22 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 12 01:21:36 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:05:51 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:36:53 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:04:10 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:19:27 EST 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:19:52 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 11 |
Keywords | Depression Family Oncology Genetic testing Lynch Snydrome Cancer |
Language | English |
License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c6121-f90fd043fc9432b1bbd791b9ee5f56f11373f9b6622e2155da5bc62773c3e2b83 |
Notes | istex:051EE5E1BF3C6712C9D211994D857811E1EEE152 ArticleID:PON3551 ark:/67375/WNG-7RR91C5J-X SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 |
OpenAccessLink | http://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3551 |
PMID | 24872228 |
PQID | 1622695764 |
PQPubID | 31336 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4208971 proquest_miscellaneous_1644473468 proquest_miscellaneous_1639990249 proquest_miscellaneous_1616475232 proquest_journals_1622695764 pubmed_primary_24872228 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_pon_3551 crossref_primary_10_1002_pon_3551 wiley_primary_10_1002_pon_3551_PON3551 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_7RR91C5J_X |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | November 2014 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2014 text: November 2014 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Chichester |
PublicationTitle | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Psycho-Oncology |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | Harwood J, Sparks L. Social identity and health: an intergroup communication approach to cancer. Health Commun 2003;15:145-159. Meiser B. Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature. Psycho-Oncology 2005;14:1060-1074. Broadstock M, Michie S, Marteau T. Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet: EJHG 2000;8:731-738. Van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Duivenvoorden HJ, et al. A prospective study of the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC on family relationships. Psycho-Oncology 2007;16(4):320-328. Marteau TM, Croyle RT. The new genetics: psychological responses to genetic testing. Brit Med J 1998;316:693-696. Järvinen HJ, Aarnio M, Mustonen H, et al. Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol 2000;118:829-834. McBride CM, Koehly LM, Sanderson SC, Kaphingst KA. The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annu Rev Public Health 2010;31:89-103. Lodder L, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW, et al. Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result. Am J Med Genet 2001;98:15-24. Weil J. Psychosocial Genetic Counseling. Oxford University Press: New York, 2000. Peterson SK. The role of the family in genetic testing: theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions. Health Educ Behav 2005;32:627-639. Jenkins MA, Baglietto L, Dowty JG, et al. Cancer risks for mismatch repair gene mutation carriers: a population-based early onset case-family study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:489-498. Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 1979;41:209-218. Codori AM, Zawacki KL, Petersen GM, et al. Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer in children: long-term psychological effects. Am J Med Genet Part A 2003;116:117-128. Hampel H, Stephens JA, Pukkala E, et al. Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset. Gastroenterol 2005;129:415-421. Huggins M, Bloch M, Wiggins S, et al. Predictive testing for Huntington disease in Canada: adverse effects and unexpected results in those receiving a decreased risk. Am J Med Genet 1992;42:508-515. Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ 2008;337:a2338. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, 1991. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1(3):385-401. Hadley DW, Ashida S, Jenkins JF, et al. Generation after generation: exploring the psychological impact of providing genetic services through a cascading approach. Genet Med 2010;12:808-815. Lerman C, Croyle RT, Tercyak KP, Hamann H. Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002;70:784. Lyons RF, Mickelson KD, Sullivan MJ, Coyne JC. Coping as a communal process. J Soc Pers Relat 1998;15:579-605. Strang D, Soule SA. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: from hybrid corn to poison pills. Annu Rev Sociol 1998;24:265-290. Shiloh S, Koehly L, Jenkins J, Martin J, Hadley D. Monitoring coping style moderates emotional reactions to genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study. Psycho-Oncology 2008;17:746-755. Michie S, Bobrow M, Marteau TM. Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact. J Med Genet 2001;38:519-526. Aktan-Collan K, Kääriäinen H, Järvinen H, et al. Psychosocial consequences of predictive genetic testing for lynch syndrome and associations to surveillance behaviour in a 7-year follow-up study. Fam Cancer 2013;12:639-646. Lindor NM, Petersen GM, Hadley DW, et al. Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome. JAMA 2006;296:1507-1517. Peterson SK, Watts BG, Koehly LM, et al. How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study. Am J Med Genet Part C 2003;119:78-86 Wiley Online Library. Ersig AL, Hadley DW, Koehly LM. Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: Examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results. Health Communication 2011;26:587-594. Ashida S, Hadley DW, Vaughn BK, Kuhn NR, Jenkins JF, Koehly LM. The impact of familial environment on depression scores after genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Clin Genet 2009;75:43-49. Valente TW. Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Soc networks 1996;18(1):69-89. Hadley DW, Jenkins J, Dimond E, et al. Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:573-582. Burt RS. Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am J Sociol 1987;92:1287-1335. Murakami Y, Okamura H, Sugano K, et al. Psychologic distress after disclosure of genetic test results regarding hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2004;101:395-403. Sorenson JR, Botkin JR. Genetic testing and the family. Am J Med Genet Part C 2003;119:1-2. Hamann HA, Smith TW, Smith KR, et al. Interpersonal responses among sibling dyads tested for BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations. Health Psychol 2008;27:100-109. Jemmott JB, Ditto PH, Croyle RT. Judging health status: effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;50(5):899-905. Smith KR, West JA, Croyle RT, Botkin JR. Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: moderating effect of siblings' test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:385-392. Lerman C, Daly M, Masny A, Balshem A. Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 1994;12(4):843-850. Folkman S, Moskowitz JT. Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annu Rev Psychol 2004;55:745-774. Koehly LM, Peterson SK, Watts BG, Kempf KK, Vernon SW, Gritz ER. A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12:304-313. 2010; 12 2004; 101 2010; 31 2003; 119 1996; 18 1986; 50 2003; 116 1987; 92 2000; 118 2000; 8 2008; 17 1998; 316 2003; 15 2006; 296 2006; 4 1991 1999; 8 2007; 16 2003; 12 1998; 24 2004; 55 1998; 15 2009; 75 2000 2013; 12 2008; 27 2005; 129 1994; 12 1977; 1 2005; 32 2008; 337 2002; 70 2001; 38 2011; 26 1992; 42 1979; 41 2005; 14 2001; 98 2003; 163 e_1_2_8_28_1 e_1_2_8_24_1 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_26_1 e_1_2_8_27_1 Smith KR (e_1_2_8_7_1) 1999; 8 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_4_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 e_1_2_8_9_1 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 e_1_2_8_21_1 e_1_2_8_22_1 e_1_2_8_23_1 e_1_2_8_41_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_39_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 Aiken LS (e_1_2_8_40_1) 1991 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_36_1 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_35_1 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_38_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 e_1_2_8_37_1 Weil J (e_1_2_8_29_1) 2000 Koehly LM (e_1_2_8_30_1) 2003; 12 e_1_2_8_32_1 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_31_1 e_1_2_8_11_1 e_1_2_8_34_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 e_1_2_8_33_1 |
References_xml | – reference: Jenkins MA, Baglietto L, Dowty JG, et al. Cancer risks for mismatch repair gene mutation carriers: a population-based early onset case-family study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:489-498. – reference: Peterson SK, Watts BG, Koehly LM, et al. How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study. Am J Med Genet Part C 2003;119:78-86 Wiley Online Library. – reference: Lerman C, Daly M, Masny A, Balshem A. Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 1994;12(4):843-850. – reference: Peterson SK. The role of the family in genetic testing: theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions. Health Educ Behav 2005;32:627-639. – reference: Meiser B. Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature. Psycho-Oncology 2005;14:1060-1074. – reference: Smith KR, West JA, Croyle RT, Botkin JR. Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: moderating effect of siblings' test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:385-392. – reference: Hamann HA, Smith TW, Smith KR, et al. Interpersonal responses among sibling dyads tested for BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations. Health Psychol 2008;27:100-109. – reference: Järvinen HJ, Aarnio M, Mustonen H, et al. Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol 2000;118:829-834. – reference: Van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Duivenvoorden HJ, et al. A prospective study of the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC on family relationships. Psycho-Oncology 2007;16(4):320-328. – reference: McBride CM, Koehly LM, Sanderson SC, Kaphingst KA. The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annu Rev Public Health 2010;31:89-103. – reference: Shiloh S, Koehly L, Jenkins J, Martin J, Hadley D. Monitoring coping style moderates emotional reactions to genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study. Psycho-Oncology 2008;17:746-755. – reference: Radloff LS. The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1(3):385-401. – reference: Burt RS. Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am J Sociol 1987;92:1287-1335. – reference: Hadley DW, Ashida S, Jenkins JF, et al. Generation after generation: exploring the psychological impact of providing genetic services through a cascading approach. Genet Med 2010;12:808-815. – reference: Marteau TM, Croyle RT. The new genetics: psychological responses to genetic testing. Brit Med J 1998;316:693-696. – reference: Hadley DW, Jenkins J, Dimond E, et al. Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:573-582. – reference: Ashida S, Hadley DW, Vaughn BK, Kuhn NR, Jenkins JF, Koehly LM. The impact of familial environment on depression scores after genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Clin Genet 2009;75:43-49. – reference: Weil J. Psychosocial Genetic Counseling. Oxford University Press: New York, 2000. – reference: Koehly LM, Peterson SK, Watts BG, Kempf KK, Vernon SW, Gritz ER. A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12:304-313. – reference: Aktan-Collan K, Kääriäinen H, Järvinen H, et al. Psychosocial consequences of predictive genetic testing for lynch syndrome and associations to surveillance behaviour in a 7-year follow-up study. Fam Cancer 2013;12:639-646. – reference: Harwood J, Sparks L. Social identity and health: an intergroup communication approach to cancer. Health Commun 2003;15:145-159. – reference: Valente TW. Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Soc networks 1996;18(1):69-89. – reference: Codori AM, Zawacki KL, Petersen GM, et al. Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer in children: long-term psychological effects. Am J Med Genet Part A 2003;116:117-128. – reference: Sorenson JR, Botkin JR. Genetic testing and the family. Am J Med Genet Part C 2003;119:1-2. – reference: Lindor NM, Petersen GM, Hadley DW, et al. Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome. JAMA 2006;296:1507-1517. – reference: Murakami Y, Okamura H, Sugano K, et al. Psychologic distress after disclosure of genetic test results regarding hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2004;101:395-403. – reference: Lyons RF, Mickelson KD, Sullivan MJ, Coyne JC. Coping as a communal process. J Soc Pers Relat 1998;15:579-605. – reference: Huggins M, Bloch M, Wiggins S, et al. Predictive testing for Huntington disease in Canada: adverse effects and unexpected results in those receiving a decreased risk. Am J Med Genet 1992;42:508-515. – reference: Lodder L, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW, et al. Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result. Am J Med Genet 2001;98:15-24. – reference: Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ 2008;337:a2338. – reference: Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, 1991. – reference: Lerman C, Croyle RT, Tercyak KP, Hamann H. Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002;70:784. – reference: Folkman S, Moskowitz JT. Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annu Rev Psychol 2004;55:745-774. – reference: Hampel H, Stephens JA, Pukkala E, et al. Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset. Gastroenterol 2005;129:415-421. – reference: Broadstock M, Michie S, Marteau T. Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet: EJHG 2000;8:731-738. – reference: Michie S, Bobrow M, Marteau TM. Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact. J Med Genet 2001;38:519-526. – reference: Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 1979;41:209-218. – reference: Ersig AL, Hadley DW, Koehly LM. Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: Examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results. Health Communication 2011;26:587-594. – reference: Strang D, Soule SA. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: from hybrid corn to poison pills. Annu Rev Sociol 1998;24:265-290. – reference: Jemmott JB, Ditto PH, Croyle RT. Judging health status: effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;50(5):899-905. – volume: 129 start-page: 415 year: 2005 end-page: 421 article-title: Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset publication-title: Gastroenterol – volume: 38 start-page: 519 year: 2001 end-page: 526 article-title: Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact publication-title: J Med Genet – volume: 15 start-page: 579 year: 1998 end-page: 605 article-title: Coping as a communal process publication-title: J Soc Pers Relat – volume: 12 start-page: 304 year: 2003 end-page: 313 article-title: A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev – volume: 8 start-page: 385 year: 1999 end-page: 392 article-title: Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: moderating effect of siblings' test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev – volume: 92 start-page: 1287 year: 1987 end-page: 1335 article-title: Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence publication-title: Am J Sociol – volume: 12 start-page: 843 issue: 4 year: 1994 end-page: 850 article-title: Attitudes about genetic testing for breast‐ovarian cancer susceptibility publication-title: J Clin Oncol – volume: 50 start-page: 899 issue: 5 year: 1986 end-page: 905 article-title: Judging health status: effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance publication-title: J Pers Soc Psychol – volume: 4 start-page: 489 year: 2006 end-page: 498 article-title: Cancer risks for mismatch repair gene mutation carriers: a population‐based early onset case‐family study publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 14 start-page: 1060 year: 2005 end-page: 1074 article-title: Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature publication-title: Psycho‐Oncology – volume: 32 start-page: 627 year: 2005 end-page: 639 article-title: The role of the family in genetic testing: theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions publication-title: Health Educ Behav – volume: 98 start-page: 15 year: 2001 end-page: 24 article-title: Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result publication-title: Am J Med Genet – volume: 70 start-page: 784 year: 2002 article-title: Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications publication-title: J Consult Clin Psychol – year: 2000 – volume: 101 start-page: 395 year: 2004 end-page: 403 article-title: Psychologic distress after disclosure of genetic test results regarding hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma publication-title: Cancer – volume: 119 start-page: 78 year: 2003 end-page: 86 article-title: How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study publication-title: Am J Med Genet Part C – volume: 27 start-page: 100 year: 2008 end-page: 109 article-title: Interpersonal responses among sibling dyads tested for BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations publication-title: Health Psychol – volume: 296 start-page: 1507 year: 2006 end-page: 1517 article-title: Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome publication-title: JAMA – volume: 337 year: 2008 article-title: Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study publication-title: BMJ – volume: 316 start-page: 693 year: 1998 end-page: 696 article-title: The new genetics: psychological responses to genetic testing publication-title: Brit Med J – volume: 118 start-page: 829 year: 2000 end-page: 834 article-title: Controlled 15‐year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer publication-title: Gastroenterol – volume: 18 start-page: 69 issue: 1 year: 1996 end-page: 89 article-title: Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations publication-title: Soc networks – volume: 1 start-page: 385 issue: 3 year: 1977 end-page: 401 article-title: The CES‐D scale a self‐report depression scale for research in the general population publication-title: Appl Psychol Meas – volume: 75 start-page: 43 year: 2009 end-page: 49 article-title: The impact of familial environment on depression scores after genetic testing for cancer susceptibility publication-title: Clin Genet – volume: 119 start-page: 1 year: 2003 end-page: 2 article-title: Genetic testing and the family publication-title: Am J Med Genet Part C – volume: 15 start-page: 145 year: 2003 end-page: 159 article-title: Social identity and health: an intergroup communication approach to cancer publication-title: Health Commun – volume: 163 start-page: 573 year: 2003 end-page: 582 article-title: Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer publication-title: Arch Intern Med – volume: 12 start-page: 808 year: 2010 end-page: 815 article-title: Generation after generation: exploring the psychological impact of providing genetic services through a cascading approach publication-title: Genet Med – volume: 8 start-page: 731 year: 2000 end-page: 738 article-title: Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review publication-title: Eur J Hum Genet: EJHG – volume: 24 start-page: 265 year: 1998 end-page: 290 article-title: Diffusion in organizations and social movements: from hybrid corn to poison pills publication-title: Annu Rev Sociol – volume: 26 start-page: 587 year: 2011 end-page: 594 article-title: Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: Examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results publication-title: Health Communication – volume: 116 start-page: 117 year: 2003 end-page: 128 article-title: Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer in children: long‐term psychological effects publication-title: Am J Med Genet Part A – volume: 12 start-page: 639 year: 2013 end-page: 646 article-title: Psychosocial consequences of predictive genetic testing for lynch syndrome and associations to surveillance behaviour in a 7‐year follow‐up study publication-title: Fam Cancer – volume: 55 start-page: 745 year: 2004 end-page: 774 article-title: Coping: Pitfalls and promise publication-title: Annu Rev Psychol – volume: 16 start-page: 320 issue: 4 year: 2007 end-page: 328 article-title: A prospective study of the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC on family relationships publication-title: Psycho‐Oncology – volume: 42 start-page: 508 year: 1992 end-page: 515 article-title: Predictive testing for Huntington disease in Canada: adverse effects and unexpected results in those receiving a decreased risk publication-title: Am J Med Genet – year: 1991 – volume: 41 start-page: 209 year: 1979 end-page: 218 article-title: Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress publication-title: Psychosom Med – volume: 31 start-page: 89 year: 2010 end-page: 103 article-title: The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? publication-title: Annu Rev Public Health – volume: 17 start-page: 746 year: 2008 end-page: 755 article-title: Monitoring coping style moderates emotional reactions to genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study publication-title: Psycho‐Oncology – ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(20010101)98:1<15::AID-AJMG1014>3.0.CO;2-0 – ident: e_1_2_8_35_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.265 – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103532 – ident: e_1_2_8_32_1 doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2338 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(00)70168-5 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.70.3.784 – volume-title: Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions year: 1991 ident: e_1_2_8_40_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 doi: 10.1002/pon.933 – ident: e_1_2_8_41_1 doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.558338 – ident: e_1_2_8_36_1 doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.5.573 – ident: e_1_2_8_33_1 doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(95)00256-1 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f69dbb – volume: 8 start-page: 385 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 article-title: Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: moderating effect of siblings' test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.100 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.01.002 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.10009 – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7132.693 – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.899 – ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 doi: 10.1002/pon.1062 – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01104.x – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.8.519 – ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.10010 – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1502_3 – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.1002/pon.1338 – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1002/cncr.20363 – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456 – volume-title: Psychosocial Genetic Counseling year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 doi: 10.1093/oso/9780195120660.001.0001 – volume: 12 start-page: 304 year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 article-title: A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev – ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10926 – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 doi: 10.1177/1090198105278751 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200532 – ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320420417 – ident: e_1_2_8_38_1 doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.4.843 – ident: e_1_2_8_34_1 doi: 10.1086/228667 – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 doi: 10.1177/0265407598155001 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.011 – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1007/s10689-013-9628-9 – ident: e_1_2_8_37_1 doi: 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004 – ident: e_1_2_8_39_1 doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306 – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.1001/jama.296.12.1507 |
SSID | ssj0010096 |
Score | 2.14391 |
Snippet | Objective
Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family‐centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family... Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family-centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family context... Objective Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes is a family-centered process. Nonetheless, little research has explored how the family... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1292 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Aged Anxiety - psychology Cancer Carriers Colorectal cancer Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis - genetics Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis - psychology Depression Depression - psychology Extended family Family Family - psychology Female Genetic counseling Genetic disorders Genetic Predisposition to Disease - psychology Genetic Testing Heterozygote Humans Lynch Snydrome Male Mental depression Middle Aged Mutation Oncology Psychological aspects Psychological distress Public domain Relatives Stress, Psychological - psychology Susceptibility Young Adult |
Title | Exploring psychological responses to genetic testing for Lynch Syndrome within the family context |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-7RR91C5J-X/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fpon.3551 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24872228 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1622695764 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1616475232 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1639990249 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1644473468 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4208971 |
Volume | 23 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZQkVAvPMqjgYKMhOCUdh2_kiMqlKqiC1qoWImDZTu2WhVlV7tZifLrmcmLLpQKccohX5TYnvF8Y4-_EPIi16J0XpephuCWCl7aNI-RpzD00XJbOiXwvPPxWB2eiKOpnHZVlXgWptWHGBbc0DOa-Rod3Lrl3i_R0DmMEgRLzHwYVyib_2YyKEcxpObNRqfUKaYYve7sKNvrH1yLRDexU79fRTP_rJa8zGKbMHRwh3ztG9BWn5zvrmq363_8pu34fy28S2537JS-bs3pHrkRqi1y67jbf98im8N8eXGf2KF-j84vT6N00dbdhiWtZxQMFM9J0hrlPAAKJJm-v6j8Kf3UiSVQXAs-qyhQUdqut1AsoIeo8YCcHLz9vH-Ydn9sSD0qkaWxGMVyJHj0heCZY86VumCuCEFGqSJjXPNYOKWyLADXkKWVzqtMa-55yFzOH5KNalaFbUItE95JFj2LSOmslSNugwh5HlWpokzIq370jO_kzPGvGt9MK8ScGWipwe5LyPMBOW8lPK7AvGwMYADYxTmWvGlpvozfGT2ZFGxfHplpQnZ6CzGdty8Ng_aoAjI3Ae8aboOf4uaLrcJshRhUboO0P7sOA3SxQBHH6zBCCM2FyhPyqDXM4aMzyD5xRS8hes1kBwBqia_fqc5OG01xrLIoNPZDY5F_7Sjz8cMYr4__FfiEbALHFO3xzR2yUS9W4SnwuNo9azz2J-MoR4U |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LbxMxELaqVoJeeJTXQgEjIThtG6_t9a44oYoSShJQaEUOlSzba6tV0SZKE4ny65nZFw2UCnHKYb8osT3j-WY8_paQl5kShXWqiBUEt1jwwsRZCDyGpQ-Gm8KmAu87D0dp_0gcTORkjbxp78LU-hBdwQ09o9qv0cGxIL37SzV0BssE0RJSn43qeA4Z0bjTjmJIzqujTqliTDJa5dlestt-cyUWbeC0fr-KaP7ZL3mZx1aBaP82OW6HUPefnO0sF3bH_fhN3fE_x3iH3GoIKn1bW9RdsubLLXJj2BzBb5HNbsu8uEdM18JHZ5d3UjqvW2_9OV1MKdgoXpWkC1T0ACjwZDq4KN0J_dLoJVAsB5-WFNgorUsuFHvoIXDcJ0f77w73-nHz0obYoRhZHPJeKHqCB5cLnlhmbaFyZnPvZZBpYIwrHnKbpknigW7Iwkjr0kQp7rhPbMYfkPVyWvpHhBomnJUsOBaQ1Rkje9x44bMspEUaZERet8unXaNoji_W-KZrLeZEw0g1Tl9EXnTIWa3icQXmVWUBHcDMz7DrTUn9dfReq_E4Z3vyQE8ist2aiG4c_lwzGE-aQ_Im4Le6x-CqeP5iSj9dIgbF2yDzT67DAGPMUcfxOowQQnGRZhF5WFtm96cTSECxqBcRtWKzHQDlxFeflKcnlaw4NlrkCuehMsm_TpT-_GmEn4__Ffic3OwfDgd68GH08QnZBMop6tuc22R9MV_6p0DrFvZZ5b4_AS0lS6M |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZQK1W9QCmv0AJGQnBKu45fyREVllLapVqoWImDZSe2WhVlV9usRPn1zORFF0qFOOWQL0psz3i-scdfCHmRalG4XBexhuAWC17YOA2BxzD0wXJbOCXwvPPRSO2fiIOJnLRVlXgWptGH6Bfc0DPq-RodfFaE3V-ioTMYJQiWkPmsCgVREgnRuJeOYsjN651OqWPMMTrh2UGy2z25FIpWsVe_X8cz_yyXvEpj6zg0vEO-di1oyk_OdxaV28l__Cbu-H9N3CC3W3pKXzf2dJfc8uUmWTtqN-A3yXo_YV7eI7Yv4KOzq_MonTeFt_6CVlMKFooHJWmFeh4ABZZMDy_L_JR-atUSKC4Gn5UUuChtFlwoVtBD2LhPToZvP-_tx-0vG-IcpcjikA1CMRA85JngiWPOFTpjLvNeBqkCY1zzkDmlksQD2ZCFlS5XidY85z5xKX9AVspp6R8RapnInWQhZwE5nbVywK0XPk2DKlSQEXnVjZ7JWz1z_K3GN9MoMScGWmqw-yLyvEfOGg2PazAvawPoAXZ-jjVvWpovo3dGj8cZ25MHZhKR7c5CTOvuF4ZBe1QGqZuAd_W3wVFx98WWfrpADEq3Qd6f3IQBvpihiuNNGCGE5kKlEXnYGGb_0Qmkn7ikFxG9ZLI9AMXEl--UZ6e1qDiWWWQa-6G2yL92lDn-OMLr438FPiNrx2-G5vD96MMWWQe-KZqjnNtkpZov_BPgdJV7WjvvTxvGSlI |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring+psychological+responses+to+genetic+testing+for+Lynch+Syndrome+within+the+family+context&rft.jtitle=Psycho-oncology+%28Chichester%2C+England%29&rft.au=Eliezer%2C+Dina&rft.au=Hadley%2C+Donald+W.&rft.au=Koehly%2C+Laura+M.&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.issn=1057-9249&rft.eissn=1099-1611&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1292&rft.epage=1299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fpon.3551&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F24872228&rft.externalDocID=PMC4208971 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1057-9249&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1057-9249&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1057-9249&client=summon |