The effect of movement representation techniques on ankle function and performance in persons with or without a lateral ankle sprain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background Lateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation. Up to 74% will experience ongoing symptoms after a lateral ankle sprain. In healthy subjects, motor imagery might induce neural changes in the somato...
Saved in:
| Published in | BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 786 - 20 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
London
BioMed Central
04.10.2023
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1471-2474 1471-2474 |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12891-023-06906-9 |
Cover
| Abstract | Background
Lateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation. Up to 74% will experience ongoing symptoms after a lateral ankle sprain. In healthy subjects, motor imagery might induce neural changes in the somatosensory and motor areas of the brain, yielding favourable enhancements in muscular force. However, during motor imagery, difficulties in building a motor image, no somatosensory feedback, and the absence of structural changes at the level of the muscle might explain the differences found between motor imagery and physical practice. In rehabilitation, motor imagery might be supportive in rebuilding motor networks or creating new networks to restore impairments in muscle activation and movement patterns. This systematic review was undertaken to summarize the current body of evidence about the effect on motor imagery, or action observation, on lower leg strength, muscle performance, ankle range of motion, balance, and edema in persons with, and without, a lateral ankle sprain compared to usual care, a placebo intervention, or no intervention.
Methods
A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in healthy participants and participants with a lateral ankle sprain. Motor imagery or action observation in isolation, or in combination with usual care were compared to a placebo intervention, or no intervention. An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl, Psychinfo, Sportdiscus, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar was conducted, and articles published up to 7
th
June 2023 were included. Two reviewers individually screened titles and abstracts for relevancy using the inclusion criteria. Variables related to muscle strength, muscle function, range of motion, balance, return to sports tests, or questionnaires on self-reported function or activities were extracted. A risk of bias assessment was done using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool II by two reviewers. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed when two or more studies reported the same outcome measures. The Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) was calculated over the change from baseline scores. Review manager 5.4 was used to perform analysis of subgroup differences and test for statistically significant differences. Confidence intervals were visually checked for overlap between subgroups.
Results
Nine studies, six examining healthy participants and three examining participants with an acute lateral ankle sprain, were included. All studies were rated with moderate to high risk of bias overall. Quality of the motor imagery interventions differed largely between studies. Meta-analysis showed a large and significant effect of motor imagery on lower leg strength (SMD 1.47, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.50); however, the evidence was downgraded to very low certainty due to substantial heterogeneity (I
2
= 73%), limitations in the studies (some concerns in risk of bias in all studies), and imprecision (
n
= < 300). Evidence showed no association with ankle range of motion (SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.93), edema (SMD -1.11, 95% CI -1.60 to 3.81), the anterior reach direction of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) (SMD 0.73, 95% CI -0.62 to 2.08), the posterolateral direction (SMD 0.32, 95% CI -0.94 to 1.57), and the posteromedial direction (SMD 0.52, 95% CI -0.07 to 1.10). The certainty of evidence for the different comparisons was very low.
Conclusions
There is a low certainty, significant, positive effect for motor imagery being able to improve lower leg muscle strength in healthy participants. The effect on balance, range of motion and edema was uncertain and of very low certainty.
Systematic review registration
PROSPERO CRD42021243258. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background Lateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation. Up to 74% will experience ongoing symptoms after a lateral ankle sprain. In healthy subjects, motor imagery might induce neural changes in the somatosensory and motor areas of the brain, yielding favourable enhancements in muscular force. However, during motor imagery, difficulties in building a motor image, no somatosensory feedback, and the absence of structural changes at the level of the muscle might explain the differences found between motor imagery and physical practice. In rehabilitation, motor imagery might be supportive in rebuilding motor networks or creating new networks to restore impairments in muscle activation and movement patterns. This systematic review was undertaken to summarize the current body of evidence about the effect on motor imagery, or action observation, on lower leg strength, muscle performance, ankle range of motion, balance, and edema in persons with, and without, a lateral ankle sprain compared to usual care, a placebo intervention, or no intervention. Methods A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in healthy participants and participants with a lateral ankle sprain. Motor imagery or action observation in isolation, or in combination with usual care were compared to a placebo intervention, or no intervention. An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl, Psychinfo, Sportdiscus, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar was conducted, and articles published up to 7.sup.th June 2023 were included. Two reviewers individually screened titles and abstracts for relevancy using the inclusion criteria. Variables related to muscle strength, muscle function, range of motion, balance, return to sports tests, or questionnaires on self-reported function or activities were extracted. A risk of bias assessment was done using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool II by two reviewers. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed when two or more studies reported the same outcome measures. The Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) was calculated over the change from baseline scores. Review manager 5.4 was used to perform analysis of subgroup differences and test for statistically significant differences. Confidence intervals were visually checked for overlap between subgroups. Results Nine studies, six examining healthy participants and three examining participants with an acute lateral ankle sprain, were included. All studies were rated with moderate to high risk of bias overall. Quality of the motor imagery interventions differed largely between studies. Meta-analysis showed a large and significant effect of motor imagery on lower leg strength (SMD 1.47, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.50); however, the evidence was downgraded to very low certainty due to substantial heterogeneity (I.sup.2 = 73%), limitations in the studies (some concerns in risk of bias in all studies), and imprecision (n = < 300). Evidence showed no association with ankle range of motion (SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.93), edema (SMD -1.11, 95% CI -1.60 to 3.81), the anterior reach direction of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) (SMD 0.73, 95% CI -0.62 to 2.08), the posterolateral direction (SMD 0.32, 95% CI -0.94 to 1.57), and the posteromedial direction (SMD 0.52, 95% CI -0.07 to 1.10). The certainty of evidence for the different comparisons was very low. Conclusions There is a low certainty, significant, positive effect for motor imagery being able to improve lower leg muscle strength in healthy participants. The effect on balance, range of motion and edema was uncertain and of very low certainty. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42021243258. Keywords: Imagery, Psychotherapy, Systematic review [Publication Type], Lateral ligament, Ankle, Rehabilitation, Muscle strength Lateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation. Up to 74% will experience ongoing symptoms after a lateral ankle sprain. In healthy subjects, motor imagery might induce neural changes in the somatosensory and motor areas of the brain, yielding favourable enhancements in muscular force. However, during motor imagery, difficulties in building a motor image, no somatosensory feedback, and the absence of structural changes at the level of the muscle might explain the differences found between motor imagery and physical practice. In rehabilitation, motor imagery might be supportive in rebuilding motor networks or creating new networks to restore impairments in muscle activation and movement patterns. This systematic review was undertaken to summarize the current body of evidence about the effect on motor imagery, or action observation, on lower leg strength, muscle performance, ankle range of motion, balance, and edema in persons with, and without, a lateral ankle sprain compared to usual care, a placebo intervention, or no intervention.BACKGROUNDLateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation. Up to 74% will experience ongoing symptoms after a lateral ankle sprain. In healthy subjects, motor imagery might induce neural changes in the somatosensory and motor areas of the brain, yielding favourable enhancements in muscular force. However, during motor imagery, difficulties in building a motor image, no somatosensory feedback, and the absence of structural changes at the level of the muscle might explain the differences found between motor imagery and physical practice. In rehabilitation, motor imagery might be supportive in rebuilding motor networks or creating new networks to restore impairments in muscle activation and movement patterns. This systematic review was undertaken to summarize the current body of evidence about the effect on motor imagery, or action observation, on lower leg strength, muscle performance, ankle range of motion, balance, and edema in persons with, and without, a lateral ankle sprain compared to usual care, a placebo intervention, or no intervention.A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in healthy participants and participants with a lateral ankle sprain. Motor imagery or action observation in isolation, or in combination with usual care were compared to a placebo intervention, or no intervention. An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl, Psychinfo, Sportdiscus, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar was conducted, and articles published up to 7th June 2023 were included. Two reviewers individually screened titles and abstracts for relevancy using the inclusion criteria. Variables related to muscle strength, muscle function, range of motion, balance, return to sports tests, or questionnaires on self-reported function or activities were extracted. A risk of bias assessment was done using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool II by two reviewers. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed when two or more studies reported the same outcome measures. The Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) was calculated over the change from baseline scores. Review manager 5.4 was used to perform analysis of subgroup differences and test for statistically significant differences. Confidence intervals were visually checked for overlap between subgroups.METHODSA systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in healthy participants and participants with a lateral ankle sprain. Motor imagery or action observation in isolation, or in combination with usual care were compared to a placebo intervention, or no intervention. An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl, Psychinfo, Sportdiscus, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar was conducted, and articles published up to 7th June 2023 were included. Two reviewers individually screened titles and abstracts for relevancy using the inclusion criteria. Variables related to muscle strength, muscle function, range of motion, balance, return to sports tests, or questionnaires on self-reported function or activities were extracted. A risk of bias assessment was done using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool II by two reviewers. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed when two or more studies reported the same outcome measures. The Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) was calculated over the change from baseline scores. Review manager 5.4 was used to perform analysis of subgroup differences and test for statistically significant differences. Confidence intervals were visually checked for overlap between subgroups.Nine studies, six examining healthy participants and three examining participants with an acute lateral ankle sprain, were included. All studies were rated with moderate to high risk of bias overall. Quality of the motor imagery interventions differed largely between studies. Meta-analysis showed a large and significant effect of motor imagery on lower leg strength (SMD 1.47, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.50); however, the evidence was downgraded to very low certainty due to substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 73%), limitations in the studies (some concerns in risk of bias in all studies), and imprecision (n = < 300). Evidence showed no association with ankle range of motion (SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.93), edema (SMD -1.11, 95% CI -1.60 to 3.81), the anterior reach direction of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) (SMD 0.73, 95% CI -0.62 to 2.08), the posterolateral direction (SMD 0.32, 95% CI -0.94 to 1.57), and the posteromedial direction (SMD 0.52, 95% CI -0.07 to 1.10). The certainty of evidence for the different comparisons was very low.RESULTSNine studies, six examining healthy participants and three examining participants with an acute lateral ankle sprain, were included. All studies were rated with moderate to high risk of bias overall. Quality of the motor imagery interventions differed largely between studies. Meta-analysis showed a large and significant effect of motor imagery on lower leg strength (SMD 1.47, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.50); however, the evidence was downgraded to very low certainty due to substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 73%), limitations in the studies (some concerns in risk of bias in all studies), and imprecision (n = < 300). Evidence showed no association with ankle range of motion (SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.93), edema (SMD -1.11, 95% CI -1.60 to 3.81), the anterior reach direction of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) (SMD 0.73, 95% CI -0.62 to 2.08), the posterolateral direction (SMD 0.32, 95% CI -0.94 to 1.57), and the posteromedial direction (SMD 0.52, 95% CI -0.07 to 1.10). The certainty of evidence for the different comparisons was very low.There is a low certainty, significant, positive effect for motor imagery being able to improve lower leg muscle strength in healthy participants. The effect on balance, range of motion and edema was uncertain and of very low certainty.CONCLUSIONSThere is a low certainty, significant, positive effect for motor imagery being able to improve lower leg muscle strength in healthy participants. The effect on balance, range of motion and edema was uncertain and of very low certainty.PROSPERO CRD42021243258.SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATIONPROSPERO CRD42021243258. Abstract Background Lateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation. Up to 74% will experience ongoing symptoms after a lateral ankle sprain. In healthy subjects, motor imagery might induce neural changes in the somatosensory and motor areas of the brain, yielding favourable enhancements in muscular force. However, during motor imagery, difficulties in building a motor image, no somatosensory feedback, and the absence of structural changes at the level of the muscle might explain the differences found between motor imagery and physical practice. In rehabilitation, motor imagery might be supportive in rebuilding motor networks or creating new networks to restore impairments in muscle activation and movement patterns. This systematic review was undertaken to summarize the current body of evidence about the effect on motor imagery, or action observation, on lower leg strength, muscle performance, ankle range of motion, balance, and edema in persons with, and without, a lateral ankle sprain compared to usual care, a placebo intervention, or no intervention. Methods A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in healthy participants and participants with a lateral ankle sprain. Motor imagery or action observation in isolation, or in combination with usual care were compared to a placebo intervention, or no intervention. An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl, Psychinfo, Sportdiscus, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar was conducted, and articles published up to 7th June 2023 were included. Two reviewers individually screened titles and abstracts for relevancy using the inclusion criteria. Variables related to muscle strength, muscle function, range of motion, balance, return to sports tests, or questionnaires on self-reported function or activities were extracted. A risk of bias assessment was done using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool II by two reviewers. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed when two or more studies reported the same outcome measures. The Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) was calculated over the change from baseline scores. Review manager 5.4 was used to perform analysis of subgroup differences and test for statistically significant differences. Confidence intervals were visually checked for overlap between subgroups. Results Nine studies, six examining healthy participants and three examining participants with an acute lateral ankle sprain, were included. All studies were rated with moderate to high risk of bias overall. Quality of the motor imagery interventions differed largely between studies. Meta-analysis showed a large and significant effect of motor imagery on lower leg strength (SMD 1.47, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.50); however, the evidence was downgraded to very low certainty due to substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 73%), limitations in the studies (some concerns in risk of bias in all studies), and imprecision (n = < 300). Evidence showed no association with ankle range of motion (SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.93), edema (SMD -1.11, 95% CI -1.60 to 3.81), the anterior reach direction of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) (SMD 0.73, 95% CI -0.62 to 2.08), the posterolateral direction (SMD 0.32, 95% CI -0.94 to 1.57), and the posteromedial direction (SMD 0.52, 95% CI -0.07 to 1.10). The certainty of evidence for the different comparisons was very low. Conclusions There is a low certainty, significant, positive effect for motor imagery being able to improve lower leg muscle strength in healthy participants. The effect on balance, range of motion and edema was uncertain and of very low certainty. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42021243258. Lateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation. Up to 74% will experience ongoing symptoms after a lateral ankle sprain. In healthy subjects, motor imagery might induce neural changes in the somatosensory and motor areas of the brain, yielding favourable enhancements in muscular force. However, during motor imagery, difficulties in building a motor image, no somatosensory feedback, and the absence of structural changes at the level of the muscle might explain the differences found between motor imagery and physical practice. In rehabilitation, motor imagery might be supportive in rebuilding motor networks or creating new networks to restore impairments in muscle activation and movement patterns. This systematic review was undertaken to summarize the current body of evidence about the effect on motor imagery, or action observation, on lower leg strength, muscle performance, ankle range of motion, balance, and edema in persons with, and without, a lateral ankle sprain compared to usual care, a placebo intervention, or no intervention. A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in healthy participants and participants with a lateral ankle sprain. Motor imagery or action observation in isolation, or in combination with usual care were compared to a placebo intervention, or no intervention. An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl, Psychinfo, Sportdiscus, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar was conducted, and articles published up to 7.sup.th June 2023 were included. Two reviewers individually screened titles and abstracts for relevancy using the inclusion criteria. Variables related to muscle strength, muscle function, range of motion, balance, return to sports tests, or questionnaires on self-reported function or activities were extracted. A risk of bias assessment was done using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool II by two reviewers. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed when two or more studies reported the same outcome measures. The Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) was calculated over the change from baseline scores. Review manager 5.4 was used to perform analysis of subgroup differences and test for statistically significant differences. Confidence intervals were visually checked for overlap between subgroups. Nine studies, six examining healthy participants and three examining participants with an acute lateral ankle sprain, were included. All studies were rated with moderate to high risk of bias overall. Quality of the motor imagery interventions differed largely between studies. Meta-analysis showed a large and significant effect of motor imagery on lower leg strength (SMD 1.47, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.50); however, the evidence was downgraded to very low certainty due to substantial heterogeneity (I.sup.2 = 73%), limitations in the studies (some concerns in risk of bias in all studies), and imprecision (n = < 300). Evidence showed no association with ankle range of motion (SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.93), edema (SMD -1.11, 95% CI -1.60 to 3.81), the anterior reach direction of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) (SMD 0.73, 95% CI -0.62 to 2.08), the posterolateral direction (SMD 0.32, 95% CI -0.94 to 1.57), and the posteromedial direction (SMD 0.52, 95% CI -0.07 to 1.10). The certainty of evidence for the different comparisons was very low. There is a low certainty, significant, positive effect for motor imagery being able to improve lower leg muscle strength in healthy participants. The effect on balance, range of motion and edema was uncertain and of very low certainty. PROSPERO CRD42021243258. Background Lateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation. Up to 74% will experience ongoing symptoms after a lateral ankle sprain. In healthy subjects, motor imagery might induce neural changes in the somatosensory and motor areas of the brain, yielding favourable enhancements in muscular force. However, during motor imagery, difficulties in building a motor image, no somatosensory feedback, and the absence of structural changes at the level of the muscle might explain the differences found between motor imagery and physical practice. In rehabilitation, motor imagery might be supportive in rebuilding motor networks or creating new networks to restore impairments in muscle activation and movement patterns. This systematic review was undertaken to summarize the current body of evidence about the effect on motor imagery, or action observation, on lower leg strength, muscle performance, ankle range of motion, balance, and edema in persons with, and without, a lateral ankle sprain compared to usual care, a placebo intervention, or no intervention. Methods A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in healthy participants and participants with a lateral ankle sprain. Motor imagery or action observation in isolation, or in combination with usual care were compared to a placebo intervention, or no intervention. An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl, Psychinfo, Sportdiscus, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar was conducted, and articles published up to 7 th June 2023 were included. Two reviewers individually screened titles and abstracts for relevancy using the inclusion criteria. Variables related to muscle strength, muscle function, range of motion, balance, return to sports tests, or questionnaires on self-reported function or activities were extracted. A risk of bias assessment was done using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool II by two reviewers. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed when two or more studies reported the same outcome measures. The Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) was calculated over the change from baseline scores. Review manager 5.4 was used to perform analysis of subgroup differences and test for statistically significant differences. Confidence intervals were visually checked for overlap between subgroups. Results Nine studies, six examining healthy participants and three examining participants with an acute lateral ankle sprain, were included. All studies were rated with moderate to high risk of bias overall. Quality of the motor imagery interventions differed largely between studies. Meta-analysis showed a large and significant effect of motor imagery on lower leg strength (SMD 1.47, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.50); however, the evidence was downgraded to very low certainty due to substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 73%), limitations in the studies (some concerns in risk of bias in all studies), and imprecision ( n = < 300). Evidence showed no association with ankle range of motion (SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.93), edema (SMD -1.11, 95% CI -1.60 to 3.81), the anterior reach direction of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) (SMD 0.73, 95% CI -0.62 to 2.08), the posterolateral direction (SMD 0.32, 95% CI -0.94 to 1.57), and the posteromedial direction (SMD 0.52, 95% CI -0.07 to 1.10). The certainty of evidence for the different comparisons was very low. Conclusions There is a low certainty, significant, positive effect for motor imagery being able to improve lower leg muscle strength in healthy participants. The effect on balance, range of motion and edema was uncertain and of very low certainty. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42021243258. Lateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation. Up to 74% will experience ongoing symptoms after a lateral ankle sprain. In healthy subjects, motor imagery might induce neural changes in the somatosensory and motor areas of the brain, yielding favourable enhancements in muscular force. However, during motor imagery, difficulties in building a motor image, no somatosensory feedback, and the absence of structural changes at the level of the muscle might explain the differences found between motor imagery and physical practice. In rehabilitation, motor imagery might be supportive in rebuilding motor networks or creating new networks to restore impairments in muscle activation and movement patterns. This systematic review was undertaken to summarize the current body of evidence about the effect on motor imagery, or action observation, on lower leg strength, muscle performance, ankle range of motion, balance, and edema in persons with, and without, a lateral ankle sprain compared to usual care, a placebo intervention, or no intervention. A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in healthy participants and participants with a lateral ankle sprain. Motor imagery or action observation in isolation, or in combination with usual care were compared to a placebo intervention, or no intervention. An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl, Psychinfo, Sportdiscus, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar was conducted, and articles published up to 7 June 2023 were included. Two reviewers individually screened titles and abstracts for relevancy using the inclusion criteria. Variables related to muscle strength, muscle function, range of motion, balance, return to sports tests, or questionnaires on self-reported function or activities were extracted. A risk of bias assessment was done using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool II by two reviewers. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed when two or more studies reported the same outcome measures. The Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) was calculated over the change from baseline scores. Review manager 5.4 was used to perform analysis of subgroup differences and test for statistically significant differences. Confidence intervals were visually checked for overlap between subgroups. Nine studies, six examining healthy participants and three examining participants with an acute lateral ankle sprain, were included. All studies were rated with moderate to high risk of bias overall. Quality of the motor imagery interventions differed largely between studies. Meta-analysis showed a large and significant effect of motor imagery on lower leg strength (SMD 1.47, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.50); however, the evidence was downgraded to very low certainty due to substantial heterogeneity (I = 73%), limitations in the studies (some concerns in risk of bias in all studies), and imprecision (n = < 300). Evidence showed no association with ankle range of motion (SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.93), edema (SMD -1.11, 95% CI -1.60 to 3.81), the anterior reach direction of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) (SMD 0.73, 95% CI -0.62 to 2.08), the posterolateral direction (SMD 0.32, 95% CI -0.94 to 1.57), and the posteromedial direction (SMD 0.52, 95% CI -0.07 to 1.10). The certainty of evidence for the different comparisons was very low. There is a low certainty, significant, positive effect for motor imagery being able to improve lower leg muscle strength in healthy participants. The effect on balance, range of motion and edema was uncertain and of very low certainty. PROSPERO CRD42021243258. BackgroundLateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation. Up to 74% will experience ongoing symptoms after a lateral ankle sprain. In healthy subjects, motor imagery might induce neural changes in the somatosensory and motor areas of the brain, yielding favourable enhancements in muscular force. However, during motor imagery, difficulties in building a motor image, no somatosensory feedback, and the absence of structural changes at the level of the muscle might explain the differences found between motor imagery and physical practice. In rehabilitation, motor imagery might be supportive in rebuilding motor networks or creating new networks to restore impairments in muscle activation and movement patterns. This systematic review was undertaken to summarize the current body of evidence about the effect on motor imagery, or action observation, on lower leg strength, muscle performance, ankle range of motion, balance, and edema in persons with, and without, a lateral ankle sprain compared to usual care, a placebo intervention, or no intervention.MethodsA systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in healthy participants and participants with a lateral ankle sprain. Motor imagery or action observation in isolation, or in combination with usual care were compared to a placebo intervention, or no intervention. An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl, Psychinfo, Sportdiscus, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar was conducted, and articles published up to 7th June 2023 were included. Two reviewers individually screened titles and abstracts for relevancy using the inclusion criteria. Variables related to muscle strength, muscle function, range of motion, balance, return to sports tests, or questionnaires on self-reported function or activities were extracted. A risk of bias assessment was done using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool II by two reviewers. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed when two or more studies reported the same outcome measures. The Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) was calculated over the change from baseline scores. Review manager 5.4 was used to perform analysis of subgroup differences and test for statistically significant differences. Confidence intervals were visually checked for overlap between subgroups.ResultsNine studies, six examining healthy participants and three examining participants with an acute lateral ankle sprain, were included. All studies were rated with moderate to high risk of bias overall. Quality of the motor imagery interventions differed largely between studies. Meta-analysis showed a large and significant effect of motor imagery on lower leg strength (SMD 1.47, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.50); however, the evidence was downgraded to very low certainty due to substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 73%), limitations in the studies (some concerns in risk of bias in all studies), and imprecision (n = < 300). Evidence showed no association with ankle range of motion (SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.93), edema (SMD -1.11, 95% CI -1.60 to 3.81), the anterior reach direction of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) (SMD 0.73, 95% CI -0.62 to 2.08), the posterolateral direction (SMD 0.32, 95% CI -0.94 to 1.57), and the posteromedial direction (SMD 0.52, 95% CI -0.07 to 1.10). The certainty of evidence for the different comparisons was very low.ConclusionsThere is a low certainty, significant, positive effect for motor imagery being able to improve lower leg muscle strength in healthy participants. The effect on balance, range of motion and edema was uncertain and of very low certainty.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42021243258. |
| ArticleNumber | 786 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Pelgrim, Thomas van der Worp, Maarten P. Stolwijk, Niki M. Siemes, Luuk J.F. Nieuwenhuijzen, P. Henk J.A. Staal, J. Bart |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Luuk J.F. surname: Siemes fullname: Siemes, Luuk J.F. email: Luuk.Siemes@han.nl organization: School of Sport and Exercise, HAN University of Applied Sciences – sequence: 2 givenname: Maarten P. surname: van der Worp fullname: van der Worp, Maarten P. organization: School of Allied Health, HAN University of Applied Sciences – sequence: 3 givenname: P. Henk J.A. surname: Nieuwenhuijzen fullname: Nieuwenhuijzen, P. Henk J.A. organization: School of Allied Health, HAN University of Applied Sciences – sequence: 4 givenname: Niki M. surname: Stolwijk fullname: Stolwijk, Niki M. organization: School of Allied Health, HAN University of Applied Sciences – sequence: 5 givenname: Thomas surname: Pelgrim fullname: Pelgrim, Thomas organization: HAN Study Centres, HAN University of Applied Sciences – sequence: 6 givenname: J. Bart surname: Staal fullname: Staal, J. Bart organization: School of Allied Health, HAN University of Applied Sciences and IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794344$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9UsluHCEQbUWO4iX5gRwipFxyaYetG8glsqwslizl4pwRQxczON0wge6x5pvyk2GW2B4rsjgUFO-9oop3Wh2FGKCq3hJ8TohsP2ZCpSI1pqzGrcJtrV5UJ4QLUlMu-NGj_XF1mvMtxkRIpl5Vx0wIxRnnJ9WfmwUgcA7siKJDQ1zBAGFECZYJctmZ0ceARrCL4H9PkFE5mfCrB-SmYLeXJnRoCcnFNJhgAfmwOeYYMrrz4wLFtI1xGpFBvRkhmX6vkZfJ-PCp5PM6jzCUarbUXnm428oOMJraBNOvs8-vq5fO9Bne7ONZ9fPrl5vL7_X1j29XlxfXtW2xHGtJFHGubSw1hABmRGEsKbdCECM4NbbE0rzjBpQA7pzoOGddqxrMcNfN2Fl1tdPtornVy-QHk9Y6Gq-3iZjm2qTy0B40o8ywprFACOUzAMkInmE5E8Co4lIWrc87reU0G6CzZaKl-wPRw5vgF3oeV5rghktBeVH4sFdIcfMBox58ttD3JkCcsqZSMMqVaFiBvn8CvY1TKtPbogRXDWXNA2puSgc-uFgK242ovhCtkJg0aoM6_w-qrA4Gb4sRnS_5A8K7x53et_jPawVAdwCbYs4J3D2EYL0xtN4ZWhdD662htSok-YRk_c6T5Tm-f57KdtRiMh_mkB6m8QzrL6jhC2o |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_14474_ptrs_2024_13_4_534 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_025_08496_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_app15020820 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282fbf9e0 10.1093/ptj/85.10.1053 10.5958/0976-5506.2018.00392.3 10.1186/s12916-022-02295-3 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002706 10.1026/1612-5010.12.1.11 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00194 10.1177/0269215513501528 10.1016/j.jphys.2019.08.007 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.11.023 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04334.x 10.1373/clinchem.2008.117614 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 10.1186/1741-7015-9-75 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.07.014 10.1136/bmj.n71 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.11.001 10.1007/s00702-007-0763-z 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.09.010 10.20540/JIAPTR.2020.11.1.1999 10.1002/ejp.1540 10.1136/bmj.l4898 10.1007/s40279-018-0874-8 10.1007/s40279-017-0781-4 10.1016/S1388-2457(11)60093-X 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.03.005 10.7717/peerj.7681 10.1177/0363546506294470 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002129 10.1002/9781119536604.ch2 10.1007/s12178-020-09631-1 10.4085/168-20 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.10.015 10.1007/s10484-011-9175-9 10.1371/journal.pone.0221089 10.1136/bmj.331.7515.507 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.04.004 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.05.025 10.1002/mus.10406 10.1016/j.humov.2006.07.010 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098885 10.1136/bmj.39504.506319.80 10.1515/jirspa-2016-0006 10.1007/s00421-020-04582-4 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.008 10.1080/17461391.2017.1415377 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE 10.1007/s40279-016-0666-y 10.3390/brainsci10010027 10.1016/j.jcm.2011.02.001 10.1002/9781119536604.ch5 10.1007/s40279-019-01071-3 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06893-3 10.1002/9781119536604.ch6 10.1002/9781119536604.ch13 10.1123/jsep.34.5.621 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098106 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092394 10.4085/1062-6050-344-18 10.1002/9781119536604.ch7 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000648 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2023 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature. COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2023 – notice: 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QP 7RV 7TK 7TS 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. KB0 M0S M1P NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12891-023-06906-9 |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Database Neurosciences Abstracts Physical Education Index Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Open Access Content Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Physical Education Index ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Publicly Available Content Database |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 5 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
| EISSN | 1471-2474 |
| EndPage | 20 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_323a355ce1124bee8310b08b7e329488 PMC10548724 A767801595 37794344 10_1186_s12891_023_06906_9 |
| Genre | Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7RV 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK IAO IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS U2A UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ALIPV PMFND 3V. 7QP 7TK 7TS 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-8191ff65c2a11e031900824c771a742ac71a434f4ae97e4ff7d443d695030ddb3 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
| ISSN | 1471-2474 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:32:00 EDT 2025 Tue Sep 30 17:11:07 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 02:45:01 EDT 2025 Sat Jul 26 00:23:28 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:25:33 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:25:01 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 28 04:24:41 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 01:54:37 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:02:06 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:29:11 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Ankle Muscle strength Lateral ligament Psychotherapy Rehabilitation Imagery Systematic review [Publication Type] |
| Language | English |
| License | 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c608t-8191ff65c2a11e031900824c771a742ac71a434f4ae97e4ff7d443d695030ddb3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2877495235?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
| PMID | 37794344 |
| PQID | 2877495235 |
| PQPubID | 44767 |
| PageCount | 20 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_323a355ce1124bee8310b08b7e329488 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10548724 proquest_miscellaneous_2873249753 proquest_journals_2877495235 gale_infotracmisc_A767801595 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A767801595 pubmed_primary_37794344 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_023_06906_9 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12891_023_06906_9 springer_journals_10_1186_s12891_023_06906_9 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2023-10-04 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-10-04 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2023 text: 2023-10-04 day: 04 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | BMC musculoskeletal disorders |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMC Musculoskelet Disord |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Musculoskelet Disord |
| PublicationYear | 2023 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
| References | J Thomas (6906_CR35) 2019; 23 G Nunes (6906_CR30) 2015; 22 C Ruffino (6906_CR23) 2017; 341 AR Needle (6906_CR15) 2017; 47 M Ouzzani (6906_CR34) 2016; 5 AH Paravlic (6906_CR27) 2019; 14 GH Guyatt (6906_CR44) 2008; 55 6906_CR47 M Yoon (6906_CR48) 2018; 9 A Abraham (6906_CR63) 2017; 12 Z Suica (6906_CR73) 2022; 20 J Ekstrand (6906_CR5) 2013; 47 J Hertel (6906_CR12) 2019; 54 6906_CR40 AS Bruce (6906_CR14) 2020; 52 S Sidaway (6906_CR29) 2005; 85 T Willems (6906_CR11) 2002; 37 6906_CR8 AH Paravlic (6906_CR74) 2020; 101 SE Williams (6906_CR72) 2012; 34 MJ Page (6906_CR33) 2020; 2021 G Buccino (6906_CR69) 2012; 54 I Zijdewind (6906_CR10) 2003; 28 V Nicholson (6906_CR77) 2019; 65 GH Guyatt (6906_CR43) 2008; 336 A Christakou (6906_CR31) 2007; 8 L Suso-Martí (6906_CR22) 2020; 24 F Cuenca-Martínez (6906_CR67) 2019; 2019 V Nagar (6906_CR60) 2014; 3 6906_CR39 6906_CR38 JP Higgins (6906_CR41) 2019; 23 C Thompson (6906_CR9) 2018; 48 S Van Deun (6906_CR13) 2007; 35 6906_CR71 E Delahunt (6906_CR1) 2018; 52 AH Paravlic (6906_CR25) 2018; 48 JAC Sterne (6906_CR36) 2019; 366 S Grosprêtre (6906_CR61) 2017; 18 H Thieme (6906_CR19) 2016; 17 I Boutron (6906_CR37) 2019; 23 C Schuster (6906_CR46) 2011; 9 M Dehghan (6906_CR62) 2013; 3 A Bouguetoch (6906_CR64) 2021; 121 ELR Orr (6906_CR17) 2008; 19 B Tassignon (6906_CR2) 2019; 49 F Cuenca-Martínez (6906_CR16) 2020; 10 T Mulder (6906_CR26) 2007; 114 6906_CR66 6906_CR21 6906_CR65 E Kristianslund (6906_CR4) 2011; 44 6906_CR20 P D’Hooghe (6906_CR6) 2020; 13 GH Guyatt (6906_CR42) 2008; 9 R Ferrer-Peña (6906_CR75) 2021; 25 A Dello Iacono (6906_CR24) 2021; 53 A Christakou (6906_CR32) 2007; 26 M Reiser (6906_CR70) 2005; 12 GH Guyatt (6906_CR45) 2008; 336 DH Bang (6906_CR68) 2013; 27 M Reiser (6906_CR49) 2011; 2 F Lebon (6906_CR28) 2012; 37 6906_CR18 G Vuurberg (6906_CR7) 2018; 52 F Natali (6906_CR53) 2011; 122 JC Dubin (6906_CR3) 2011; 10 6906_CR59 6906_CR58 6906_CR55 6906_CR54 YBW Da (6906_CR76) 2019; 35 6906_CR57 6906_CR56 6906_CR51 6906_CR50 6906_CR52 |
| References_xml | – volume: 19 start-page: 625 issue: 6 year: 2008 ident: 6906_CR17 publication-title: NeuroReport doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282fbf9e0 – volume: 85 start-page: 1053 issue: 10 year: 2005 ident: 6906_CR29 publication-title: Phys Ther doi: 10.1093/ptj/85.10.1053 – volume: 9 start-page: 838 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 6906_CR48 publication-title: Indian J Public Health Res Dev doi: 10.5958/0976-5506.2018.00392.3 – volume: 20 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 6906_CR73 publication-title: BMC Med doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02295-3 – volume: 22 start-page: 282 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 6906_CR30 publication-title: Fisioterapia e Pesquisa – volume: 53 start-page: 2324 issue: 11 year: 2021 ident: 6906_CR24 publication-title: Med Sci Sports Exerc doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002706 – ident: 6906_CR56 – volume: 12 start-page: 11 issue: 1 year: 2005 ident: 6906_CR70 publication-title: Z Sportpsychol doi: 10.1026/1612-5010.12.1.11 – volume: 2 start-page: 194 year: 2011 ident: 6906_CR49 publication-title: Front Psychol doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00194 – volume: 27 start-page: 1118 issue: 12 year: 2013 ident: 6906_CR68 publication-title: Clin Rehabil doi: 10.1177/0269215513501528 – volume: 65 start-page: 200 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 6906_CR77 publication-title: J Physiother doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2019.08.007 – volume: 341 start-page: 61 year: 2017 ident: 6906_CR23 publication-title: Neuroscience doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.11.023 – volume: 54 start-page: 822 issue: 9 year: 2012 ident: 6906_CR69 publication-title: Dev Med Child Neurol doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04334.x – volume: 55 start-page: 853 issue: 5 year: 2008 ident: 6906_CR44 publication-title: Br Med J doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.117614 – volume: 5 start-page: 210 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 6906_CR34 publication-title: Syst Rev doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 – volume: 9 start-page: 75 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 6906_CR46 publication-title: BMC Med doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-75 – volume: 44 start-page: 2576 issue: 14 year: 2011 ident: 6906_CR4 publication-title: J Biomech doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.07.014 – volume: 2021 start-page: 372 year: 2020 ident: 6906_CR33 publication-title: The BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71 – volume: 25 start-page: 698 issue: 6 year: 2021 ident: 6906_CR75 publication-title: Braz J Phys Ther doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.11.001 – volume: 114 start-page: 1265 issue: 10 year: 2007 ident: 6906_CR26 publication-title: J Neural Transm doi: 10.1007/s00702-007-0763-z – ident: 6906_CR52 – ident: 6906_CR21 doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.09.010 – ident: 6906_CR57 – ident: 6906_CR51 doi: 10.20540/JIAPTR.2020.11.1.1999 – volume: 3 start-page: 576 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 6906_CR62 publication-title: Eur J Exp Biol – volume: 24 start-page: 1 issue: January year: 2020 ident: 6906_CR22 publication-title: European J Pain (United Kingdom) doi: 10.1002/ejp.1540 – volume: 366 start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: 6906_CR36 publication-title: The BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898 – volume: 48 start-page: 1165 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 6906_CR25 publication-title: Sports Med doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0874-8 – volume: 48 start-page: 189 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 6906_CR9 publication-title: Sports Med doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0781-4 – volume: 122 start-page: S29 year: 2011 ident: 6906_CR53 publication-title: Clin Neurophysiol doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(11)60093-X – volume: 8 start-page: 130 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 6906_CR31 publication-title: Phys Ther Sport doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.03.005 – volume: 2019 start-page: 1 issue: 9 year: 2019 ident: 6906_CR67 publication-title: PeerJ doi: 10.7717/peerj.7681 – volume: 35 start-page: 274 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: 6906_CR13 publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/0363546506294470 – volume: 52 start-page: 335 year: 2020 ident: 6906_CR14 publication-title: Med Sci Sports Exerc doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002129 – volume: 23 start-page: 13 year: 2019 ident: 6906_CR35 publication-title: Wiley doi: 10.1002/9781119536604.ch2 – volume: 13 start-page: 281 issue: 3 year: 2020 ident: 6906_CR6 publication-title: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09631-1 – ident: 6906_CR8 doi: 10.4085/168-20 – volume: 17 start-page: 167 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: 6906_CR19 publication-title: Journal of Pain doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.10.015 – volume: 37 start-page: 45 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 6906_CR28 publication-title: Appl Psychophysiol Biofeed doi: 10.1007/s10484-011-9175-9 – ident: 6906_CR39 – ident: 6906_CR58 – volume: 14 start-page: 1 issue: 8 year: 2019 ident: 6906_CR27 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221089 – ident: 6906_CR47 doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7515.507 – volume: 101 start-page: 1447 year: 2020 ident: 6906_CR74 publication-title: American Congress Rehab Med doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.04.004 – volume: 9 start-page: 257 issue: 3 year: 2008 ident: 6906_CR42 publication-title: Br Med J – ident: 6906_CR71 doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.05.025 – volume: 28 start-page: 168 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: 6906_CR10 publication-title: Muscle Nerve doi: 10.1002/mus.10406 – volume: 26 start-page: 141 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 6906_CR32 publication-title: Hum Mov Sci doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2006.07.010 – volume: 52 start-page: 1304 issue: 20 year: 2018 ident: 6906_CR1 publication-title: Br J Sports Med doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098885 – volume: 336 start-page: 1170 issue: 7654 year: 2008 ident: 6906_CR45 publication-title: Br Med J doi: 10.1136/bmj.39504.506319.80 – volume: 12 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 6906_CR63 publication-title: J Imag Res Sport Phys Act doi: 10.1515/jirspa-2016-0006 – volume: 121 start-page: 941 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 6906_CR64 publication-title: Eur J Appl Physiol doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04582-4 – ident: 6906_CR18 doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.008 – volume: 18 start-page: 209 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 6906_CR61 publication-title: Eur J Sport Sci doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1415377 – volume: 37 start-page: 487 issue: 4 year: 2002 ident: 6906_CR11 publication-title: J Athl Train – volume: 336 start-page: 995 issue: may year: 2008 ident: 6906_CR43 publication-title: Br Med J doi: 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE – volume: 47 start-page: 1271 issue: 7 year: 2017 ident: 6906_CR15 publication-title: Sports Med doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0666-y – volume: 10 start-page: 27 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 6906_CR16 publication-title: Brain Sci doi: 10.3390/brainsci10010027 – ident: 6906_CR40 – ident: 6906_CR50 – volume: 10 start-page: 204 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 6906_CR3 publication-title: J Chiropr Med doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2011.02.001 – ident: 6906_CR38 doi: 10.1002/9781119536604.ch5 – volume: 49 start-page: 601 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 6906_CR2 publication-title: Sports Med doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01071-3 – ident: 6906_CR20 doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06893-3 – volume: 23 start-page: 143 year: 2019 ident: 6906_CR41 publication-title: Cochrane Handbook Syst Rev Interv doi: 10.1002/9781119536604.ch6 – ident: 6906_CR54 – ident: 6906_CR59 – ident: 6906_CR55 – ident: 6906_CR66 doi: 10.1002/9781119536604.ch13 – volume: 34 start-page: 621 year: 2012 ident: 6906_CR72 publication-title: J Sport Exercise Psychol doi: 10.1123/jsep.34.5.621 – volume: 52 start-page: 956 issue: 15 year: 2018 ident: 6906_CR7 publication-title: Br J Sports Med doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098106 – volume: 3 start-page: 2387 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 6906_CR60 publication-title: Medicina Sportiva – volume: 47 start-page: 732 issue: 12 year: 2013 ident: 6906_CR5 publication-title: Br J Sports Med doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092394 – volume: 54 start-page: 572 issue: 6 year: 2019 ident: 6906_CR12 publication-title: J Athl Train doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-344-18 – volume: 23 start-page: 177 year: 2019 ident: 6906_CR37 publication-title: Cochrane Handbook Syst Rev Interv doi: 10.1002/9781119536604.ch7 – ident: 6906_CR65 – volume: 35 start-page: 87 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 6906_CR76 publication-title: Clin J Pain doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000648 |
| SSID | ssj0017839 |
| Score | 2.3817039 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Background
Lateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation. Up to... Lateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation. Up to 74% will... Background Lateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation. Up to... BackgroundLateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation. Up to 74%... Abstract Background Lateral ankle sprains are highly prevalent and result in tissue damage, impairments of muscle strength, instability, and muscle activation.... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 786 |
| SubjectTerms | Ankle Ankle Injuries - diagnosis Ankle Injuries - therapy Ankle Joint Bias Edema Epidemiology Humans Imagery Injuries Internal Medicine Intervention Lateral ligament Leg Librarians Lower Extremity Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mental task performance Meta-analysis Muscle contraction Muscle strength Musculoskeletal diseases Orthopedics Placebos Psychotherapy Questionnaires Range of motion Rehabilitation Reviews Rheumatology Sports injuries Sports Medicine Statistical analysis Systematic review Systematic review [Publication Type] |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT1wQUB6hLTISggNE3SRObPe2IKoKCU5U6s3yU6y061Td7IHfxJ9kxnlsUwRcOEXxI_JjPI945htCXi8Qw8qxOm9EwGtGIGNTOJ8HZ8vGCclDjdHIX742F5fs81V9dSvVF_qE9fDA_cKdVmWlQSZaD4oBM95jYiyzEIb7qpRAfch9QYyNxtRwf8BB7o8hMqI53QIXRg-fEjMZSLCh5UwMJbT-33nyLaF012Hyzq1pEkbnD8mDQYuky370j8g9Hx-Tw2UEC3rzg76hya8z_TA_JD-BEmjvtkHbQDdtQgjvaIKzHEOPIp3AXLcU3jCTu6co9FKljo5e70MM6CriK6jqW4o_cml7k57trqOarjVGNa-Hb8AU9CqeQfkeNJr2ATPpsxvf6VwP0ChPyOX5p28fL_IhRUNum4XocjT3QmhqW-qi8BgRhToFs5wXGoxubeHJKhaY9pJ7FgJ3jFWukTUwF-dM9ZQcxDb654RyG0QpXbkIiOlvnGCGOcMlFhnhZUaKcceUHfDLMY3GWiU7RjSq32UFu6zSLivo827qc92jd_y19QckhKklIm-nAqBHNdCj-hc9ZuQtkpFC_gDDs3oIc4BJItKWWnJQD0AHk3VGjmct4VzbefVIiGrgK1sF9i0Hk7asoPrVVI090Vcu-naX2oCWjAHTGXnW0-00JYSXhP1gGREzip7NeV4TV98T6jgo4mDcltD1_Uj8-3H9eVFf_I9FPSL3Szy86LjBjslBd7PzJ6AMduZlOve_AKgwWtE priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELZKuXBBQHkECjISKgcIbBwndpAQWhBVhVROrNSb5fhRVtpNtrtZif4m_iQzzmNJKT1FiR-K4xn7m3jmG0JeTZDDyvIszqXHY0YQ4zKxLvbWsNzKQvgMo5FPv-cnM_7tLDvbI727bfcBN9eadphParZevPt1cfkJFP5jUHiZv9_AGov-OwzzFBRgIRdHq4sYE0vhAWyXZeMWuQ2bFUPBP-W7gwYBAKGPpbm2q9F-FWj9_128_9q9rnpWXjleDbvW8T1yt4ObdNrKx32y56oH5GBagam9vKRHNDiAhj_rB-Q3iAxt_Tto7emyDlTiDQ28l32MUkUH1tcNhTtM-e4o7o6hUFeWrnaxCHRe4S1g-g3FP760XodrvW2opguN4c-Lrg8Ygp5XH-D5jl2atpE1odula3SsOw6Vh2R2_PXHl5O4y-UQm3wimxjtQu_zzDCdJA5DpxB8cCNEosE61wauPOWea1cIx70XlvPU5kUGq5C1ZfqI7Fd15Z4QKoyXrLBs4pH8v7SSl9yWosBHpXRFRJJ-xpTpiM4x38ZCBYNH5qqdZQWzrMIsK2jzZmizamk-bqz9GQVhqIkU3eFBvT5XncarlKUawJxxgGh56RxmdCsnshQuZQUsmxF5jWKkULTh9Yzu4iFgkEjJpaYCcASAtSKLyOGoJiwAZlzcC6Lq9UeBISzA9mUpFL8cirElOtVVrt6GOgCnMbI6Io9buR2GhDyUMB88InIk0aMxj0uq-c9ATw6IHaxgBk3f9sK_e6__f9SnNw_jGbnDUC3Rd4Mfkv1mvXXPAQ825Yug0X8AipleOA priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal – databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM) dbid: U2A link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELagSIgLghZoSkFGQnCAiI3jxDG3BVFVSOXESr1ZfsJKu0m1mz3wm_onmXEeS8pD4hTFY0dx5uGZeOYzIS9niGHleJGWVcBtRhBjkzmfBmdZ6SopQoHVyBdfyvMF_3xZXPZFYdsh233YkoyWOqp1Vb7bgiXFLB2GpxFIiIPlbXKnQAECKV6w-bh3IGDNH8pj_jhusgRFpP7f7fEvC9LNZMkbO6ZxITp7QO73HiSddyx_SG75-pAczWuIntc_6Csaczrjz_JDcvei3zo_ItcgELTL3qBNoOsmAoW3NKJaDhVINR0xXbcU7vBAd09x7YtEXTt6ta80oMsab8Fj31L8n0ubTbw2u5ZqutJY3LzqnwGz0cv6PbTvsaNpVzcTH7v2rU51j5DyiCzOPn39eJ72JzWktpxVbYpRXwhlYZnOMo-FUehacCtEpiH21hauPOeBay-F5yEIx3nuSlmAjXHO5I_JQd3U_phQYUPFpGOzgND-xlXccGeExCZTeZmQbGCesj2MOZ6msVIxnKlK1TFcAcNVZLiCMW_GMVcdiMc_e39AmRh7IgB3bGg231SvzypnuQZXzXrwV7nxHs9rM7PKCJ8zCUYxIa9RohSaCXg9q_tqB5gkAm6puQAvAVwxWSTkdNIT1NtOyYNMqt68bBWEuQIiW5YD-cVIxpGYMlf7Zhf7gLOMddMJedKJ8DglRJkEfvCEVBPhnsx5SqmX3yP4OPjjEOMyGPp20IP9e_39o578X_en5B5DjcVMDX5KDtrNzj8D7681z6Oy_wRwclO- priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | The effect of movement representation techniques on ankle function and performance in persons with or without a lateral ankle sprain: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-023-06906-9 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794344 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2877495235 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2873249753 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10548724 https://doaj.org/article/323a355ce1124bee8310b08b7e329488 |
| Volume | 24 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVADU databaseName: BioMed Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: RBZ dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/ providerName: BioMedCentral – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 20001001 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVEBS databaseName: Academic Search Ultimate customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: ABDBF dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn providerName: EBSCOhost – providerCode: PRVBFR databaseName: Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: DIK dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com providerName: Flying Publisher – providerCode: PRVFQY databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: GX1 dateStart: 0 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVAQN databaseName: PubMed Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: RPM dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ providerName: National Library of Medicine – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVFZP databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 20250131 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: M48 dateStart: 20001001 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://journals.scholarsportal.info providerName: Scholars Portal – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: Springer Nature HAS Fully OA customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: AAJSJ dateStart: 20001201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.springernature.com providerName: Springer Nature – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: C6C dateStart: 20001201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.springeropen.com/ providerName: Springer Nature – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM) customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: U2A dateStart: 20001201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.springerlink.com/journals/ providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELdge-EFAeMjbFRGQvAA0ZrEiR1eUFZtmiptQkClvlmO7YxKbVLa9GF_E_8kd85HyRB7SVR_RHF9Pv_OufsdIe_GyGFlWOwnosDPjCDGeWCsXxgdJkakvIgxGvnqOrmcsek8nrcHbtvWrbLTiU5Rm0rjGfkpIHsOYD6M4i_rXz5mjcKvq20KjYfkMACoglLN573BFXDY_btAGZGcbkEXo59PiPkMUrCk08Fm5Dj7_9XMf21Nd90m73w7dVvSxRPyuMWSNGsm_yl5YMtn5CgrwY5e3dL31Hl3umPzI_Ib5IE2zhu0KuiqcjzhNXWkll0AUkl7StcthV-Yz91S3PpcpSoNXe8DDeiixJ8A2LcUj3NptXH3aldTRZcKY5uX7TNgCGpRfobyPXU0bcJm3GNXtla-aglSnpPZxfmPyaXfJmrwdTIWtY9GX1EksQ5VEFiMi0JkwTTngQLTW2m4s4gVTNmUW1YU3DAWmSSNQcUYk0cvyEFZlfYVoVwXIkxNOC6Q2T83guXM5DzFolzY1CNBN2NStyzmmExjKZ01IxLZzLKEWZZuliX0-dj3WTccHve2PkNB6Fsi_7YrqDY3sl3OMgojBUhNW4CrLLcW07XlY5FzG4Up6ESPfEAxkqgl4PW0aoMdYJDItyUzDiABkFgae-Rk0BJWtx5Wd4IoW-2ylfu14JG3fTX2RI-50lY71wawMoZNe-RlI7f9kJBkEuaDeUQMJHow5mFNufjpuMcBjoOJG0LXT53w79_r_3_q6_uHcUwehbgs0TGDnZCDerOzbwDs1fnIregROcyy6fcp3M_Or79-g9JJMhm5AxS4XjEB11mY_QHPAlo9 |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKOcAFAeWRUsBIPA4QdeM4cYKE0PKotvRxaqW9uU5sw0q7yXY3K9TfhMRvZMZ5LCmit56i-KU4Mx7P2DPfEPJygBhWmkd-nFi8ZgQ2zgJtfKtzFuskFTbCaOSj43h0yr-No_EG-d3GwqBbZSsTnaDWZY5n5Lug2QtQ5lkYfZyf-5g1Cm9X2xQaNVscmIufYLItP-x_Afq-Ymzv68nnkd9kFfDzeJBUPloo1sZRzlQQGAziwW2Q50IECuxElcOTh9xyZVJhuLVCcx7qOI1gPWidhTDuDXKThwOOWP1i3Bl4gQBtow3MSeLdJch-9CtimD8hBcs97W1-LkfAvzvBX1vhZTfNS3e1bgvcu0vuNLorHdbMdo9smOI-2RoWYLfPLuhr6rxJ3TH9FvkF_EdrZxFaWjorHS55RR2IZhvwVNAOQnZJ4Q3zxxuKW62rVIWm83VgA50U-AoGwpLi8TEtF-5Zriqq6FRhLPW0GQOmoCbFeyhfQ1XTOkzHDTszlfJVA8jygJxeCwkfks2iLMxjQkVuE5ZqNrCYSSDTCc-4zkSKRVliUo8ELcVk3qCmY_KOqXTWUxLLmsoSqCwdlSX0edv1mdeYIVe2_oSM0LVEvG9XUC6-y0Z8yJCFCjTD3IB6zDNjMD1cNkgyYUKWggz2yBtkI4lSCT4vV01wBUwS8b3kUIBSAppfGnlkp9cSpEner24ZUTbSbCnXa88jL7pq7IkeeoUpV64N6OYYpu2RRzXfdlNCUEugB_dI0uPo3pz7NcXkh8M6B_UfTGoGXd-1zL_-rv__1O2rp_Gc3BqdHB3Kw_3jgyfkNsMlik4hfIdsVouVeQqKZpU9c6ubkrPrFid_ACw6jvI |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELaglSouCFoe2xYwEoIDRN1NnNjmtjxWZaEVElTqzXJiG1badVa72QO_iT_JjPPYpjwkTlH8iOJ4ZvxNPPOZkGdD5LAyLI0y4XCbEcQ4HxkbOVPEmRGSuxSzkc_Os9MLNr1ML69k8Ydo93ZLss5pQJYmX50sjatVXGQna7CqGLET48kEEnxieZPsilRm4H7tjsfTL9NuJ4EDAmiTZf7Ys7cgBd7-363zleXpeujktf3TsCxN7pDbDZ6k41oA7pIb1u-Tg7EHX3rxgz6nIcIz_DrfJ3tnzUb6AfkJ4kHrWA5aOrooA214RQPHZZuP5GnH8LqmcIfHu1uKK2Go1N7Q5TbvgM483gJ-X1P8u0vLVbiWm4pqOteY6jxvngGj0TP_Gsq3TNK0zqIJj13YSke64Uu5Ry4m77--PY2acxuiIhuKKkIf0LksLWI9GllMk0KgwQrORxo8cV3AlSXMMW0lt8w5bhhLTCZTsDjG5Ml9suNLbx8SygsnYmnioUOi_9wIljOTc4lFubByQEbt5KmiITXHszXmKjg3IlP1hCuYcBUmXEGfl12fZU3p8c_Wb1AmupZIxx0KytU31Wi3SuJEA3ArLKBXlluLp7flQ5Fzm8QSTOSAvECJUmg04PUK3eQ-wCCRfkuNOWAGAGYyHZDjXktQ9qJf3cqkaozNWoHTy8HPjROoftpVY08MoPO23IQ2AJ0xi3pAHtQi3A0JOSdhPtiAiJ5w98bcr_Gz74GKHNA5eLwxdH3V6sH2vf7-UQ__r_kTsvf53UR9-nD-8YjcilF5MYSDHZOdarWxjwAWVvnjRvN_ARIdXDw |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+effect+of+movement+representation+techniques+on+ankle+function+and+performance+in+persons+with+or+without+a+lateral+ankle+sprain%3A+a+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=BMC+musculoskeletal+disorders&rft.au=Luuk+J.F.+Siemes&rft.au=Maarten+P.+van+der+Worp&rft.au=P.+Henk+J.A.+Nieuwenhuijzen&rft.au=Stolwijk%2C+Niki+M&rft.date=2023-10-04&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2474&rft.volume=24&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12891-023-06906-9 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon |