Using a cohort study of diabetes and peripheral artery disease to compare logistic regression and machine learning via random forest modeling

Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Methods Cohort study using fe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC medical research methodology Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 300 - 10
Main Authors Austin, Andrea M., Ramkumar, Niveditta, Gladders, Barbara, Barnes, Jonathan A., Eid, Mark A., Moore, Kayla O., Feinberg, Mark W., Creager, Mark A., Bonaca, Marc, Goodney, Philip P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 23.11.2022
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1471-2288
1471-2288
DOI10.1186/s12874-022-01774-8

Cover

Abstract Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Methods Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models. Results There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% ( n  = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% ( n  = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% ( n  = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive. Conclusions The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data.
AbstractList This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models. There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive. The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data.
This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models. There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive. The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data.
This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus.BACKGROUNDThis study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus.Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models.METHODSCohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models.There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive.RESULTSThere were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive.The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data.CONCLUSIONSThe use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data.
Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Methods Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models. Results There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% ( n  = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% ( n  = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% ( n  = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive. Conclusions The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data.
Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Methods Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models. Results There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive. Conclusions The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data. Keywords: Random forest, machine learning, critical limb ischemia, diabetes, amputation, reintervention
Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Methods Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models. Results There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive. Conclusions The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data.
Abstract Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Methods Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models. Results There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive. Conclusions The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data.
ArticleNumber 300
Audience Academic
Author Moore, Kayla O.
Ramkumar, Niveditta
Barnes, Jonathan A.
Creager, Mark A.
Goodney, Philip P.
Gladders, Barbara
Bonaca, Marc
Eid, Mark A.
Feinberg, Mark W.
Austin, Andrea M.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Andrea M.
  surname: Austin
  fullname: Austin, Andrea M.
  organization: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Niveditta
  surname: Ramkumar
  fullname: Ramkumar, Niveditta
  organization: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Barbara
  surname: Gladders
  fullname: Gladders, Barbara
  organization: Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jonathan A.
  surname: Barnes
  fullname: Barnes, Jonathan A.
  organization: Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Mark A.
  surname: Eid
  fullname: Eid, Mark A.
  organization: Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Kayla O.
  surname: Moore
  fullname: Moore, Kayla O.
  organization: Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Mark W.
  surname: Feinberg
  fullname: Feinberg, Mark W.
  organization: Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Mark A.
  surname: Creager
  fullname: Creager, Mark A.
  organization: Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Marc
  surname: Bonaca
  fullname: Bonaca, Marc
  organization: University of Colorado Medical Center
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Philip P.
  surname: Goodney
  fullname: Goodney, Philip P.
  email: Philip.P.Goodney@hitchcock.org
  organization: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418976$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9ks1q3DAUhU1JaX7aF-iiCLrpxqkl2ZK8KYTQn0Cgm2YtZOnao8GWppInMA-Rd-6dmTSdCSV4YaH7nXN9r895cRJigKJ4T6tLSpX4nClTsi4rxsqKSjypV8UZrSUtGVPq5OB8WpznvKyQUly8KU65qKlqpTgrHu6yDwMxxMZFTDPJ89ptSOyJ86aDGTIxwZEVJL9aQDIjMWmGtMFyBpOBzBGV08okIGMcfJ69JQmGBDn7GHbiydiFD1gHk8K22b03JGElTqSPSM5kig5GLL0tXvdmzPDu8X1R3H37-uv6R3n78_vN9dVtaUUl57JpWyVaAS1n1NjWGdkpqUAYAXXbVcw62fTMgXVcdtBVphKCCy77pqV917f8orjZ-7polnqV_GTSRkfj9e4ipkHjnN6OoGslOLWKglOspnXd9bXratXzqutkxSV6fdl7rdbdBM5CmHFPR6bHleAXeoj3uhWqqRqBBp8eDVL8vcZ16MlnC-NoAsR11kzyVuL_ohzRj8_QZVyngKtCqmkEaxp1QA0GB_Chj9jXbk31lWRStLKhNVKX_6HwcTB5i0nrPd4fCT4cDvo04d8wIcD2gE0x5wT9E0IrvU2s3idWY2L1LrFaoUg9E1k_mxnDg5_jx5elfC_N2CcMkP5t4wXVH7BNAOA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0293684
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_36450_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12170_024_00752_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_artmed_2024_102799
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_avsg_2023_11_057
crossref_primary_10_3390_diabetology6010002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvs_2024_06_019
crossref_primary_10_1080_1061186X_2023_2284096
crossref_primary_10_1161_JAHA_124_034477
crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2024_3509923
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_024_06980_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10791_024_09483_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvs_2025_01_215
crossref_primary_10_3390_bios14010022
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijcard_2023_04_040
Cites_doi 10.3390/ijerph17030778
10.1177/2047487319880044
10.1038/nrcardio.2016.179
10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.023
10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7_15
10.3389/fnagi.2017.00329
10.1093/aje/kwq433
10.1186/s12889-017-4914-3
10.1521/aeap.2017.29.1.49
10.1016/S0168-8227(09)70005-1
10.2337/dc14-S014
10.1177/000313480507100805
10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.100
10.1001/jama.2017.18391
10.1016/j.msksp.2018.11.012
10.1023/A:1010933404324
10.1016/j.jvs.2009.01.035
10.32614/RJ-2014-008
10.1038/s41576-019-0122-6
10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83
10.1007/s10618-012-0295-5
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593
10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30149-4
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2022
2022. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.
2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2022
– notice: 2022. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
COVID
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12874-022-01774-8
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials Local Electronic Collection Information
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic


Publicly Available Content Database

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 5
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1471-2288
EndPage 10
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_48631c81ed824144bf4db48f30bb7037
PMC9685056
A727697514
36418976
10_1186_s12874_022_01774_8
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: American Heart Association
  grantid: 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000968
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
MK0
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
AAYXX
ALIPV
CITATION
-A0
3V.
ACRMQ
ADINQ
C24
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
COVID
DWQXO
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-5998696e9321ac9da7b878e6a6e49b02cd75f2decd37beb0a0663637f591fbf93
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1471-2288
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:30:46 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:39:21 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 17:55:52 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 06:11:36 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:49:43 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:44:57 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:53:18 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:31:00 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:29 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:35:36 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords amputation
Random forest
critical limb ischemia
reintervention
machine learning
diabetes
Language English
License 2022. The Author(s).
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c607t-5998696e9321ac9da7b878e6a6e49b02cd75f2decd37beb0a0663637f591fbf93
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2755625583?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 36418976
PQID 2755625583
PQPubID 42579
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_48631c81ed824144bf4db48f30bb7037
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9685056
proquest_miscellaneous_2739741813
proquest_journals_2755625583
gale_infotracmisc_A727697514
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A727697514
pubmed_primary_36418976
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_022_01774_8
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12874_022_01774_8
springer_journals_10_1186_s12874_022_01774_8
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-11-23
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-11-23
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-11-23
  day: 23
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle BMC medical research methodology
PublicationTitleAbbrev BMC Med Res Methodol
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Med Res Methodol
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BMC
References H Quan (1774_CR27) 2005; 43
Team AV (1774_CR36) 2016
G Menardi (1774_CR37) 2014; 28
PP Goodney (1774_CR16) 2009; 50
KY Ngiam (1774_CR8) 2019; 20
C Bellinger (1774_CR5) 2017; 17
M Bruckner (1774_CR23) 1999; 5
AL Beam (1774_CR9) 2018; 319
1774_CR12
1774_CR34
1774_CR11
G Buso (1774_CR14) 2019; 26
1774_CR33
1774_CR31
SM Taylor (1774_CR17) 2005; 71
1774_CR30
JA Mayfield (1774_CR20) 2004; 27
H Quan (1774_CR26) 2011; 173
C Tack (1774_CR6) 2019; 39
1774_CR39
JA Mayfield (1774_CR19) 2000; 49
G Biau (1774_CR32) 2012; 13
G Eraslan (1774_CR3) 2019; 20
RC Deo (1774_CR7) 2015; 132
JA Mayfield (1774_CR18) 2000; 37
WS Comulada (1774_CR2) 2017; 29
JB Goldberg (1774_CR15) 2012; 56
1774_CR40
K Kirasich (1774_CR10) 2018; 1
S Huang (1774_CR4) 2018; 15
FG Fowkes (1774_CR13) 2017; 14
L Breiman (1774_CR1) 2001; 45
1774_CR25
1774_CR24
N Lunardon (1774_CR38) 2014; 6
1774_CR42
1774_CR41
1774_CR29
TW Rooke (1774_CR22) 2011; 58
1774_CR28
A Liaw (1774_CR35) 2002; 2
L Czupryniak (1774_CR21) 2009; 86
References_xml – ident: 1774_CR24
– ident: 1774_CR41
– ident: 1774_CR31
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030778
– ident: 1774_CR28
– volume: 26
  start-page: 114
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: 1774_CR14
  publication-title: Euro J Prev Cardiol
  doi: 10.1177/2047487319880044
– volume: 14
  start-page: 156
  issue: 3
  year: 2017
  ident: 1774_CR13
  publication-title: Nat Rev Cardiol
  doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.179
– volume: 1
  start-page: 9
  issue: 3
  year: 2018
  ident: 1774_CR10
  publication-title: SMU Data Sci Rev
– volume: 2
  start-page: 18
  issue: 3
  year: 2002
  ident: 1774_CR35
  publication-title: R News
– volume: 58
  start-page: 2020
  issue: 19
  year: 2011
  ident: 1774_CR22
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.023
– ident: 1774_CR30
– ident: 1774_CR11
– ident: 1774_CR42
  doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7_15
– ident: 1774_CR34
  doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00329
– volume: 173
  start-page: 676
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  ident: 1774_CR26
  publication-title: Am J Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq433
– volume: 17
  start-page: 907
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 1774_CR5
  publication-title: BMC Public Health
  doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4914-3
– volume: 29
  start-page: 49
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 1774_CR2
  publication-title: AIDS Educ Prev
  doi: 10.1521/aeap.2017.29.1.49
– volume: 5
  start-page: 609
  issue: 5
  year: 1999
  ident: 1774_CR23
  publication-title: Am J Manag Care
– volume: 86
  start-page: S22
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2009
  ident: 1774_CR21
  publication-title: Diabetes Res Clin Pract
  doi: 10.1016/S0168-8227(09)70005-1
– volume: 49
  start-page: 499
  issue: 6
  year: 2000
  ident: 1774_CR19
  publication-title: J Fam Pract
– ident: 1774_CR25
  doi: 10.2337/dc14-S014
– volume: 37
  start-page: 23
  issue: 1
  year: 2000
  ident: 1774_CR18
  publication-title: J Rehabil Res Dev
– volume: 71
  start-page: 640
  issue: 8
  year: 2005
  ident: 1774_CR17
  publication-title: Am Surg
  doi: 10.1177/000313480507100805
– volume: 56
  start-page: 1663
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  ident: 1774_CR15
  publication-title: J Vasc Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.100
– volume: 319
  start-page: 1317
  issue: 13
  year: 2018
  ident: 1774_CR9
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18391
– volume: 39
  start-page: 164
  year: 2019
  ident: 1774_CR6
  publication-title: Musculoskelet Sci Pract
  doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.11.012
– volume: 27
  start-page: S63
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2004
  ident: 1774_CR20
  publication-title: Diabetes Care
– ident: 1774_CR40
– ident: 1774_CR29
– volume: 45
  start-page: 5
  issue: 1
  year: 2001
  ident: 1774_CR1
  publication-title: Mach Learn
  doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
– volume: 50
  start-page: 54
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: 1774_CR16
  publication-title: J Vasc Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.01.035
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1063
  year: 2012
  ident: 1774_CR32
  publication-title: J Mach Learn Res
– ident: 1774_CR33
– volume-title: Analytics Vidhya
  year: 2016
  ident: 1774_CR36
– volume: 6
  start-page: 82
  year: 2014
  ident: 1774_CR38
  publication-title: R Journal
  doi: 10.32614/RJ-2014-008
– volume: 20
  start-page: 389
  issue: 7
  year: 2019
  ident: 1774_CR3
  publication-title: Nat Rev Genet
  doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0122-6
– volume: 15
  start-page: 41
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 1774_CR4
  publication-title: Cancer Genomics Proteomics
– ident: 1774_CR12
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1130
  issue: 11
  year: 2005
  ident: 1774_CR27
  publication-title: Med Care
  doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83
– ident: 1774_CR39
– volume: 28
  start-page: 92
  year: 2014
  ident: 1774_CR37
  publication-title: Data Min Knowl Disc
  doi: 10.1007/s10618-012-0295-5
– volume: 132
  start-page: 1920
  issue: 20
  year: 2015
  ident: 1774_CR7
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593
– volume: 20
  start-page: e262
  issue: 5
  year: 2019
  ident: 1774_CR8
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30149-4
SSID ssj0017836
Score 2.4493303
Snippet Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research...
This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing...
Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research...
Abstract Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 300
SubjectTerms Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Amputation
Artificial intelligence
Beneficiaries
Care and treatment
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
Comorbidity
Comparative analysis
critical limb ischemia
Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus
Diagnosis
Foot diseases
Glycated Hemoglobin
Health aspects
Health Sciences
Humans
Ischemia
Learning models (Stochastic processes)
Logistic Models
Machine Learning
Medicaid
Medical research
Medicare
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Medicine, Preventive
Methods
Patients
Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnosis
Peripheral Arterial Disease - surgery
Peripheral vascular diseases
Prevention
Preventive health services
Random forest
Regression analysis
reintervention
Research methodology
Risk factors
Sociodemographics
Statistical Theory and Methods
Statistics for Life Sciences
Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
Ulcers
United States
Variables
Vein & artery diseases
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3LbtUwELVQF4gNojxDCzISEguIGseJH8uCqCqksqJSd5afcKU2Qbe3SHwE_8yM41yaImDDLsqMIz_GmTP2-JiQl7ELIfS2g9gkNHXXuVgrlkJtlbZKeC69xwX9k4_i-LT7cNafXbvqC3PCJnrgqeMOOiU484rFoMDZwMdSF1ynEm-cA2vN58gb3czBVNk_wLMJ8xEZJQ4uGdK615i5DjJ4Ugs3lNn6f_8nX3NKNxMmb-yaZmd0dI_cLSiSHk613yW34nCf3D4p--QPyI-cCUAtxftv1xuaSWTpmOi81ErtECiSHGdWgXOaMzu_07JdQzcjLcnpdDoitPJ0HT9PObNDLnyRszBBXtZW6LeVpeD4wnhBAQhDw2i-ZQdED8np0ftP747rcvFC7UUjN3UPMZjQIgK2Y9brYKVTUkVhRey0a1ofZJ_aEH3g0kXXWMQtgsvUa5Zc0vwR2RnGIT4hNDEvYhBKJ4vcYUw5F1srmeeNSqJjFWHzOBhfWMnxcoxzk6MTJcw0dgbGzuSxM6oir7dlvk6cHH_VfovDu9VEPu38AqzMFCsz_7KyirxC4zA466F63pbDC9BI5M8yhwADhZaAPiuyv9CE2eqX4tm8TPlbXJpW9hiH9opX5MVWjCUxA26I4xXqAHKE_mOg83iyxm2TOHSkAlxZEbmw00Wbl5Jh9SVziWuhEANX5M1s0b-q9ec-ffo_-nSP3GlxRjJWt3yf7GzWV_EZILyNe54n809RIkzN
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3Nb9UwDI_GkBAXxDeFgYKExAEKTZsm6QGhgZgmpHHiSbtF-RxPemvhrUPsj-B_xk7bNzrGblXtSE1sN3bs_EzIi8C997XhEJv4Iufchlyx6HOjGqOEq6RzeKB_8EXsL_jnw_pwi0ztjsYFPLk0tMN-Uov16s2vH2fvweDfJYNX4u0JQ9D2HOvSQb_gSV0j11O-CEv5-HlWAW8sTBdnLh0325wShv-_f-q_tqqLZZQXcqlpi9q7TW6NviXdHZThDtkK7V1y42DMnt8jv1N9ADUUu-Kue5qgZWkX6XQAS03rKUIfJ6yBFU31nmd0TOLQvqNjyTodLg4tHV2Ho6GStk2Dj1NtJtDHExf6c2kobIe-O6bgHsPEaOq9A6T7ZLH36evH_Xxsx5A7Ucg-ryEyE40I4PEx4xpvpFVSBWFE4I0tSudlHUsfnK-kDbYw6M2ISsa6YdHGpnpAttuuDY8IjcyJ4IVqokFEMaasDaWRzFWFioKzjLBJDtqNWOXYMmOlU8yihB5kp0F2OslOq4y82oz5PiB1XMn9AcW74USU7fSiWx_p0Wg1V6JiTrHgFagTKHLk3nIVq8Ja-FPKjLxE5dConfB5zoxXGmCSiKqld8E5FI0EnzQjOzNOsGE3J0_qpScT0KWsMTqtVZWR5xsyjsS6uDZ0p8gD_iSsHwOeh4M2bqZUwUIq8DYzImd6OpvznNIuvyWE8UYo9Iwz8nrS6PPP-v-aPr56Fk_IzRJtjbG8rHbIdr8-DU_Bo-vts2SmfwCnBUgx
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
– databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  dbid: C6C
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1baxUxEA5aQXwR765WiSD4oIub3WySfawHSxHqk4W-hVz1QLsrp1uhP6L_2Zls9titF_DtcDKBTWYm-ZKZ-ULI68C9963hcDbxVcm5DaVi0ZdGdUYJ10jn8EL_8LM4OOKfjtvjTJODtTBX4_dMifdnDAnZS8w5B9uBX-omudXCwovWvBKrbcQAqxHmopg_9ltsPImf__dV-Mo2dD1F8lqcNG0_-_fI3Ywb6d6k6PvkRugfkNuHOTL-kFym2D81FF-83Yw00cbSIdL5cpWa3lOkNU48Aic05XJe0BygoeNAczo6nYqC1o5uwtcpS7ZPnU9T3iW059sU-mNtKGx1fjilAH1hYDS9qwNNj8jR_scvq4MyP7VQOlHJsWzh1CU6EQDNMeM6b6RVUgVhROCdrWrnZRtrH5xvpA22MohURCNj27FoY9c8Jjv90IenhEbmRPBCddEgWxhT1obaSOaaSkXBWUHYrAftMg85PodxotN5RAk96U6D7nTSnVYFebvt831i4fin9AdU71YSGbTTH2BYOjuk5ko0zCkWvAIQA0YaubdcxaayFlZBWZA3aBwa_Rw-z5lcrgCDRMYsvQfAT3QS8GZBdheS4J9u2Tybl87rw5muZYsnz1Y1BXm1bcaemPPWh-EcZQArwvwxkHkyWeN2SA1MpAIkWRC5sNPFmJct_fpbYg_vhELUW5B3s0X_-qy_z-mz_xN_Tu7U6HuMlXWzS3bGzXl4AehttC-T2_4EYA495A
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Using a cohort study of diabetes and peripheral artery disease to compare logistic regression and machine learning via random forest modeling
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-022-01774-8
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418976
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2755625583
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2739741813
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9685056
https://doaj.org/article/48631c81ed824144bf4db48f30bb7037
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3daxQxEA_agvgifrtajwiCD7p0sx9J9kl6R0sRrkixUHwJ-dr2oN2td1fBP8L_2Zls9upW7Mtyt5PAJjNJfplMfkPIe1865ypdwt7EZWlZGp9K1rhUy1pLbgthLTr050f88KT8clqdRofbKoZVDnNimKhdZ9FHvpuLCrF6JYvPVz9SzBqFp6sxhcZ9ss0AiWDqBnG62XAxvKEwXJSRfHfFkNw9xfh1kMEvOVqMAmf_vzPzX0vT7bDJW2enYUk6eEweRSxJ93rlPyH3fPuUPJjH0_Jn5HeIB6CaYhbc5ZoGKlnaNXRwuFLdOopUx4Fb4IKG-M5fNB7a0HVHY4g67S8KLSxd-rM-crYNlS9DLCbIo4eF_lxoCsuf6y4pwGFoGA25dkD0nJwc7H-bHaYx_UJqeSbWaQU7MV5zDwiPaVs7LYwU0nPNfVmbLLdOVE3uvHWFMN5kGtELL0RT1awxTV28IFtt1_pXhDbMcu-4rBuNDGJMGuNzLZgtMtnwkiWEDXpQNnKTY4qMCxX2KJKrXncKdKeC7pRMyMdNnauemePO0lNU76YksmqHF93yTMVBqkrJC2Yl804CsAHDbUpnStkUmTEwM4qEfEDjUDj24fOsjlcYoJHIoqX2AAzyWgAGTcjOqCSMWTsWD-al4pyxUjcWnpB3GzHWxDi41nfXWAbwI_QfgzIve2vcNKmAjpSALhMiRnY6avNY0i7OA6N4zSUi4YR8Giz65rP-36ev727FG_Iwx7HGWJoXO2Rrvbz2bwHBrc0kDNMJ2Z7uH309hn8zPpsEbwg856WE5_H0-x8fWEpY
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3dTxQxEG8IJOqL8dtV1JpofNAN2_3odh-IAYUcwl2MgYS32q_FS2AX7w4Nf4T_kn-bM93u4WHkjbfLTZtsO9OZ6XTmN4S8crm1tlA53E1sEue5drFgtY2VqJTgJiuNwYD-cMQHB_mnw-Jwifzua2EwrbLXiV5R29ZgjHwtLQv01QuRvT_9HmPXKHxd7VtoqNBawa57iLFQ2LHrzn_CFW66vvMR-P06Tbe39j8M4tBlIDY8KWdxARcOXnEHjgxTprKq1KIUjivu8konqbFlUafWGZuV2ulEoZHmWVkXFat1jWBMYAJWcgygLJOVza3R5y_zdwyskehLdQRfmzKEl48xgx5o8EssmEPfNeBf2_CXcbycuHnp9dYbxe075HbwZulGJ353yZJr7pEbw_Bef5_88hkJVFHswzuZUQ9mS9ua9iFfqhpLEWzZoxscU59hek7DsxGdtTQkydOuVGls6MQddbm7jZ984rNBgR5iPPTHWFEwwLY9oeCQw8Ko7_YDpAfk4FpY85AsN23jHhNaM8Od5aKqFWKYMaG1S1XJTJaImucsIqzngzQBHR2bdBxLf0sSXHa8k8A76XknRUTezuecdtggV47eRPbORyKut_-jnRzJoCZkLnjGjGDOCnCt4OjUudW5qLNEa9DNZUTeoHBI1D7weUaFIgpYJOJ4yQ1wR3lVghcckdWFkaA1zCK5Fy8ZtNZUXpyxiLyck3EmZuI1rj3DMeDBwv4xGPOok8b5kjLYSAH-bUTKBTldWPMipRl_85jmFRfoi0fkXS_RF5_1_z19cvUqXpCbg_3hntzbGe0-JbdSPHeMxWm2SpZnkzP3DPzJmX4eDi0lX69bT_wB982I9Q
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1baxQxFA7aQvFFvHe0agTBBx06mUsuj-tlqastghb6FnKtC-1M2U4Ff4T_2ZNMZu3UC_i2bE5gknNO8iXnnC8IPXe1tbZRNZxNbJHXtXY5J97migvFqamYMeFCf_-A7h3Wi6Pm6FIVf8x2H0OSQ01DYGlq-90z6wcX53T3nASa9jxkooNFwS9-HW3yRgg4fm3OZovPi3UkIVQpjMUyf-w52ZAib__vq_Ol7elq6uSV-Gnclua30M2EJ_FsMIDb6Jpr76Ct_RQxv4t-xJwArHB4CXfV40gnizuPx0tXrFqLA91x5Bc4wTHH8ztOgRvcdzilqeOhWGhp8ModD9mzbex8GvMxoT3dsuBvS4VhC7TdKQZIDAPD8b0daLqHDufvvrzZy9MTDLmhBetzmFJOBXWA8ogywiqmOeOOKupqoYvSWNb40jpjK6adLlRAMLRivhHEay-q-2ij7Vq3jbAnhjpLufAqsIgRrrUrFSOmKrinNckQGfUgTeInD89knMh4TuFUDrqToDsZdSd5hl6u-5wN7Bz_lH4d1LuWDMza8Y9udSyTo8qa04oYTpzlAG7AeH1tdc19VWgNqyPL0ItgHDL4P3yeUamMAQYZmLTkDAAhFQxwaIZ2JpLgt2baPJqXTOvGuSxZE06kDa8y9GzdHHqGXLjWdRdBBjAkzB8BmQeDNa6HVMFEckCYGWITO52MedrSLr9GVnFBeUDDGXo1WvSvz_r7nD78P_GnaOvT27n8-P7gwyN0owxuSEheVjtoo19duMcA8Hr9JPnwT945SpE
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using+a+cohort+study+of+diabetes+and+peripheral+artery+disease+to+compare+logistic+regression+and+machine+learning+via+random+forest+modeling&rft.jtitle=BMC+medical+research+methodology&rft.au=Austin%2C+Andrea+M&rft.au=Gladders%2C+Niveditta+Ramkumarrbara&rft.au=Barnes%2C+Jonathan+A&rft.au=Eid%2C+Mark+A&rft.date=2022-11-23&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2288&rft.volume=22&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12874-022-01774-8
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2288&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2288&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2288&client=summon