Using a cohort study of diabetes and peripheral artery disease to compare logistic regression and machine learning via random forest modeling
Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Methods Cohort study using fe...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC medical research methodology Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 300 - 10 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
23.11.2022
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1471-2288 1471-2288 |
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-022-01774-8 |
Cover
Abstract | Background
This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus.
Methods
Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models.
Results
There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (
n
= 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (
n
= 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (
n
= 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive.
Conclusions
The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus.
Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models.
There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive.
The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data. This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models. There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive. The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data. This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus.BACKGROUNDThis study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus.Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models.METHODSCohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models.There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive.RESULTSThere were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive.The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data.CONCLUSIONSThe use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data. Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Methods Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models. Results There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% ( n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% ( n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% ( n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive. Conclusions The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data. Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Methods Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models. Results There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive. Conclusions The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data. Keywords: Random forest, machine learning, critical limb ischemia, diabetes, amputation, reintervention Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Methods Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models. Results There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive. Conclusions The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data. Abstract Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Methods Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models. Results There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive. Conclusions The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data. |
ArticleNumber | 300 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Moore, Kayla O. Ramkumar, Niveditta Barnes, Jonathan A. Creager, Mark A. Goodney, Philip P. Gladders, Barbara Bonaca, Marc Eid, Mark A. Feinberg, Mark W. Austin, Andrea M. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Andrea M. surname: Austin fullname: Austin, Andrea M. organization: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth – sequence: 2 givenname: Niveditta surname: Ramkumar fullname: Ramkumar, Niveditta organization: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth – sequence: 3 givenname: Barbara surname: Gladders fullname: Gladders, Barbara organization: Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center – sequence: 4 givenname: Jonathan A. surname: Barnes fullname: Barnes, Jonathan A. organization: Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center – sequence: 5 givenname: Mark A. surname: Eid fullname: Eid, Mark A. organization: Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center – sequence: 6 givenname: Kayla O. surname: Moore fullname: Moore, Kayla O. organization: Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center – sequence: 7 givenname: Mark W. surname: Feinberg fullname: Feinberg, Mark W. organization: Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School – sequence: 8 givenname: Mark A. surname: Creager fullname: Creager, Mark A. organization: Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center – sequence: 9 givenname: Marc surname: Bonaca fullname: Bonaca, Marc organization: University of Colorado Medical Center – sequence: 10 givenname: Philip P. surname: Goodney fullname: Goodney, Philip P. email: Philip.P.Goodney@hitchcock.org organization: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418976$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9ks1q3DAUhU1JaX7aF-iiCLrpxqkl2ZK8KYTQn0Cgm2YtZOnao8GWppInMA-Rd-6dmTSdCSV4YaH7nXN9r895cRJigKJ4T6tLSpX4nClTsi4rxsqKSjypV8UZrSUtGVPq5OB8WpznvKyQUly8KU65qKlqpTgrHu6yDwMxxMZFTDPJ89ptSOyJ86aDGTIxwZEVJL9aQDIjMWmGtMFyBpOBzBGV08okIGMcfJ69JQmGBDn7GHbiydiFD1gHk8K22b03JGElTqSPSM5kig5GLL0tXvdmzPDu8X1R3H37-uv6R3n78_vN9dVtaUUl57JpWyVaAS1n1NjWGdkpqUAYAXXbVcw62fTMgXVcdtBVphKCCy77pqV917f8orjZ-7polnqV_GTSRkfj9e4ipkHjnN6OoGslOLWKglOspnXd9bXratXzqutkxSV6fdl7rdbdBM5CmHFPR6bHleAXeoj3uhWqqRqBBp8eDVL8vcZ16MlnC-NoAsR11kzyVuL_ohzRj8_QZVyngKtCqmkEaxp1QA0GB_Chj9jXbk31lWRStLKhNVKX_6HwcTB5i0nrPd4fCT4cDvo04d8wIcD2gE0x5wT9E0IrvU2s3idWY2L1LrFaoUg9E1k_mxnDg5_jx5elfC_N2CcMkP5t4wXVH7BNAOA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0293684 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_36450_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12170_024_00752_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_artmed_2024_102799 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_avsg_2023_11_057 crossref_primary_10_3390_diabetology6010002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvs_2024_06_019 crossref_primary_10_1080_1061186X_2023_2284096 crossref_primary_10_1161_JAHA_124_034477 crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2024_3509923 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_024_06980_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10791_024_09483_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvs_2025_01_215 crossref_primary_10_3390_bios14010022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijcard_2023_04_040 |
Cites_doi | 10.3390/ijerph17030778 10.1177/2047487319880044 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.179 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.023 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7_15 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00329 10.1093/aje/kwq433 10.1186/s12889-017-4914-3 10.1521/aeap.2017.29.1.49 10.1016/S0168-8227(09)70005-1 10.2337/dc14-S014 10.1177/000313480507100805 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.100 10.1001/jama.2017.18391 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.11.012 10.1023/A:1010933404324 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.01.035 10.32614/RJ-2014-008 10.1038/s41576-019-0122-6 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83 10.1007/s10618-012-0295-5 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30149-4 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2022 2022. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2022 – notice: 2022. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU COVID DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-022-01774-8 |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Local Electronic Collection Information ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 5 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1471-2288 |
EndPage | 10 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_48631c81ed824144bf4db48f30bb7037 PMC9685056 A727697514 36418976 10_1186_s12874_022_01774_8 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United States |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: American Heart Association grantid: 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000968 – fundername: ; grantid: 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008; 18SFRN3390008 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK IAO IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 MK0 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB AAYXX ALIPV CITATION -A0 3V. ACRMQ ADINQ C24 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 7XB 8FK AZQEC COVID DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-5998696e9321ac9da7b878e6a6e49b02cd75f2decd37beb0a0663637f591fbf93 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1471-2288 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:30:46 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:39:21 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 17:55:52 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 06:11:36 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:49:43 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:44:57 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:53:18 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:31:00 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:29 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:35:36 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | amputation Random forest critical limb ischemia reintervention machine learning diabetes |
Language | English |
License | 2022. The Author(s). Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c607t-5998696e9321ac9da7b878e6a6e49b02cd75f2decd37beb0a0663637f591fbf93 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2755625583?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 36418976 |
PQID | 2755625583 |
PQPubID | 42579 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_48631c81ed824144bf4db48f30bb7037 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9685056 proquest_miscellaneous_2739741813 proquest_journals_2755625583 gale_infotracmisc_A727697514 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A727697514 pubmed_primary_36418976 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_022_01774_8 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12874_022_01774_8 springer_journals_10_1186_s12874_022_01774_8 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-11-23 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-11-23 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2022 text: 2022-11-23 day: 23 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
PublicationTitle | BMC medical research methodology |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMC Med Res Methodol |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Med Res Methodol |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
References | H Quan (1774_CR27) 2005; 43 Team AV (1774_CR36) 2016 G Menardi (1774_CR37) 2014; 28 PP Goodney (1774_CR16) 2009; 50 KY Ngiam (1774_CR8) 2019; 20 C Bellinger (1774_CR5) 2017; 17 M Bruckner (1774_CR23) 1999; 5 AL Beam (1774_CR9) 2018; 319 1774_CR12 1774_CR34 1774_CR11 G Buso (1774_CR14) 2019; 26 1774_CR33 1774_CR31 SM Taylor (1774_CR17) 2005; 71 1774_CR30 JA Mayfield (1774_CR20) 2004; 27 H Quan (1774_CR26) 2011; 173 C Tack (1774_CR6) 2019; 39 1774_CR39 JA Mayfield (1774_CR19) 2000; 49 G Biau (1774_CR32) 2012; 13 G Eraslan (1774_CR3) 2019; 20 RC Deo (1774_CR7) 2015; 132 JA Mayfield (1774_CR18) 2000; 37 WS Comulada (1774_CR2) 2017; 29 JB Goldberg (1774_CR15) 2012; 56 1774_CR40 K Kirasich (1774_CR10) 2018; 1 S Huang (1774_CR4) 2018; 15 FG Fowkes (1774_CR13) 2017; 14 L Breiman (1774_CR1) 2001; 45 1774_CR25 1774_CR24 N Lunardon (1774_CR38) 2014; 6 1774_CR42 1774_CR41 1774_CR29 TW Rooke (1774_CR22) 2011; 58 1774_CR28 A Liaw (1774_CR35) 2002; 2 L Czupryniak (1774_CR21) 2009; 86 |
References_xml | – ident: 1774_CR24 – ident: 1774_CR41 – ident: 1774_CR31 doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030778 – ident: 1774_CR28 – volume: 26 start-page: 114 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 1774_CR14 publication-title: Euro J Prev Cardiol doi: 10.1177/2047487319880044 – volume: 14 start-page: 156 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 1774_CR13 publication-title: Nat Rev Cardiol doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.179 – volume: 1 start-page: 9 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 1774_CR10 publication-title: SMU Data Sci Rev – volume: 2 start-page: 18 issue: 3 year: 2002 ident: 1774_CR35 publication-title: R News – volume: 58 start-page: 2020 issue: 19 year: 2011 ident: 1774_CR22 publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.023 – ident: 1774_CR30 – ident: 1774_CR11 – ident: 1774_CR42 doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7_15 – ident: 1774_CR34 doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00329 – volume: 173 start-page: 676 issue: 6 year: 2011 ident: 1774_CR26 publication-title: Am J Epidemiol doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq433 – volume: 17 start-page: 907 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 1774_CR5 publication-title: BMC Public Health doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4914-3 – volume: 29 start-page: 49 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 1774_CR2 publication-title: AIDS Educ Prev doi: 10.1521/aeap.2017.29.1.49 – volume: 5 start-page: 609 issue: 5 year: 1999 ident: 1774_CR23 publication-title: Am J Manag Care – volume: 86 start-page: S22 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2009 ident: 1774_CR21 publication-title: Diabetes Res Clin Pract doi: 10.1016/S0168-8227(09)70005-1 – volume: 49 start-page: 499 issue: 6 year: 2000 ident: 1774_CR19 publication-title: J Fam Pract – ident: 1774_CR25 doi: 10.2337/dc14-S014 – volume: 37 start-page: 23 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: 1774_CR18 publication-title: J Rehabil Res Dev – volume: 71 start-page: 640 issue: 8 year: 2005 ident: 1774_CR17 publication-title: Am Surg doi: 10.1177/000313480507100805 – volume: 56 start-page: 1663 issue: 6 year: 2012 ident: 1774_CR15 publication-title: J Vasc Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.100 – volume: 319 start-page: 1317 issue: 13 year: 2018 ident: 1774_CR9 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18391 – volume: 39 start-page: 164 year: 2019 ident: 1774_CR6 publication-title: Musculoskelet Sci Pract doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.11.012 – volume: 27 start-page: S63 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2004 ident: 1774_CR20 publication-title: Diabetes Care – ident: 1774_CR40 – ident: 1774_CR29 – volume: 45 start-page: 5 issue: 1 year: 2001 ident: 1774_CR1 publication-title: Mach Learn doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324 – volume: 50 start-page: 54 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 1774_CR16 publication-title: J Vasc Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.01.035 – volume: 13 start-page: 1063 year: 2012 ident: 1774_CR32 publication-title: J Mach Learn Res – ident: 1774_CR33 – volume-title: Analytics Vidhya year: 2016 ident: 1774_CR36 – volume: 6 start-page: 82 year: 2014 ident: 1774_CR38 publication-title: R Journal doi: 10.32614/RJ-2014-008 – volume: 20 start-page: 389 issue: 7 year: 2019 ident: 1774_CR3 publication-title: Nat Rev Genet doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0122-6 – volume: 15 start-page: 41 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 1774_CR4 publication-title: Cancer Genomics Proteomics – ident: 1774_CR12 – volume: 43 start-page: 1130 issue: 11 year: 2005 ident: 1774_CR27 publication-title: Med Care doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83 – ident: 1774_CR39 – volume: 28 start-page: 92 year: 2014 ident: 1774_CR37 publication-title: Data Min Knowl Disc doi: 10.1007/s10618-012-0295-5 – volume: 132 start-page: 1920 issue: 20 year: 2015 ident: 1774_CR7 publication-title: Circulation doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593 – volume: 20 start-page: e262 issue: 5 year: 2019 ident: 1774_CR8 publication-title: Lancet Oncol doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30149-4 |
SSID | ssj0017836 |
Score | 2.4493303 |
Snippet | Background
This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research... This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing... Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research... Abstract Background This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 300 |
SubjectTerms | Aged Aged, 80 and over Algorithms Amputation Artificial intelligence Beneficiaries Care and treatment Cohort analysis Cohort Studies Comorbidity Comparative analysis critical limb ischemia Diabetes Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis Foot diseases Glycated Hemoglobin Health aspects Health Sciences Humans Ischemia Learning models (Stochastic processes) Logistic Models Machine Learning Medicaid Medical research Medicare Medicine Medicine & Public Health Medicine, Preventive Methods Patients Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnosis Peripheral Arterial Disease - surgery Peripheral vascular diseases Prevention Preventive health services Random forest Regression analysis reintervention Research methodology Risk factors Sociodemographics Statistical Theory and Methods Statistics for Life Sciences Theory of Medicine/Bioethics Ulcers United States Variables Vein & artery diseases |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3LbtUwELVQF4gNojxDCzISEguIGseJH8uCqCqksqJSd5afcKU2Qbe3SHwE_8yM41yaImDDLsqMIz_GmTP2-JiQl7ELIfS2g9gkNHXXuVgrlkJtlbZKeC69xwX9k4_i-LT7cNafXbvqC3PCJnrgqeMOOiU484rFoMDZwMdSF1ynEm-cA2vN58gb3czBVNk_wLMJ8xEZJQ4uGdK615i5DjJ4Ugs3lNn6f_8nX3NKNxMmb-yaZmd0dI_cLSiSHk613yW34nCf3D4p--QPyI-cCUAtxftv1xuaSWTpmOi81ErtECiSHGdWgXOaMzu_07JdQzcjLcnpdDoitPJ0HT9PObNDLnyRszBBXtZW6LeVpeD4wnhBAQhDw2i-ZQdED8np0ftP747rcvFC7UUjN3UPMZjQIgK2Y9brYKVTUkVhRey0a1ofZJ_aEH3g0kXXWMQtgsvUa5Zc0vwR2RnGIT4hNDEvYhBKJ4vcYUw5F1srmeeNSqJjFWHzOBhfWMnxcoxzk6MTJcw0dgbGzuSxM6oir7dlvk6cHH_VfovDu9VEPu38AqzMFCsz_7KyirxC4zA466F63pbDC9BI5M8yhwADhZaAPiuyv9CE2eqX4tm8TPlbXJpW9hiH9opX5MVWjCUxA26I4xXqAHKE_mOg83iyxm2TOHSkAlxZEbmw00Wbl5Jh9SVziWuhEANX5M1s0b-q9ec-ffo_-nSP3GlxRjJWt3yf7GzWV_EZILyNe54n809RIkzN priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3Nb9UwDI_GkBAXxDeFgYKExAEKTZsm6QGhgZgmpHHiSbtF-RxPemvhrUPsj-B_xk7bNzrGblXtSE1sN3bs_EzIi8C997XhEJv4Iufchlyx6HOjGqOEq6RzeKB_8EXsL_jnw_pwi0ztjsYFPLk0tMN-Uov16s2vH2fvweDfJYNX4u0JQ9D2HOvSQb_gSV0j11O-CEv5-HlWAW8sTBdnLh0325wShv-_f-q_tqqLZZQXcqlpi9q7TW6NviXdHZThDtkK7V1y42DMnt8jv1N9ADUUu-Kue5qgZWkX6XQAS03rKUIfJ6yBFU31nmd0TOLQvqNjyTodLg4tHV2Ho6GStk2Dj1NtJtDHExf6c2kobIe-O6bgHsPEaOq9A6T7ZLH36evH_Xxsx5A7Ucg-ryEyE40I4PEx4xpvpFVSBWFE4I0tSudlHUsfnK-kDbYw6M2ISsa6YdHGpnpAttuuDY8IjcyJ4IVqokFEMaasDaWRzFWFioKzjLBJDtqNWOXYMmOlU8yihB5kp0F2OslOq4y82oz5PiB1XMn9AcW74USU7fSiWx_p0Wg1V6JiTrHgFagTKHLk3nIVq8Ja-FPKjLxE5dConfB5zoxXGmCSiKqld8E5FI0EnzQjOzNOsGE3J0_qpScT0KWsMTqtVZWR5xsyjsS6uDZ0p8gD_iSsHwOeh4M2bqZUwUIq8DYzImd6OpvznNIuvyWE8UYo9Iwz8nrS6PPP-v-aPr56Fk_IzRJtjbG8rHbIdr8-DU_Bo-vts2SmfwCnBUgx priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1baxUxEA5aQXwR765WiSD4oIub3WySfawHSxHqk4W-hVz1QLsrp1uhP6L_2Zls9titF_DtcDKBTWYm-ZKZ-ULI68C9963hcDbxVcm5DaVi0ZdGdUYJ10jn8EL_8LM4OOKfjtvjTJODtTBX4_dMifdnDAnZS8w5B9uBX-omudXCwovWvBKrbcQAqxHmopg_9ltsPImf__dV-Mo2dD1F8lqcNG0_-_fI3Ywb6d6k6PvkRugfkNuHOTL-kFym2D81FF-83Yw00cbSIdL5cpWa3lOkNU48Aic05XJe0BygoeNAczo6nYqC1o5uwtcpS7ZPnU9T3iW059sU-mNtKGx1fjilAH1hYDS9qwNNj8jR_scvq4MyP7VQOlHJsWzh1CU6EQDNMeM6b6RVUgVhROCdrWrnZRtrH5xvpA22MohURCNj27FoY9c8Jjv90IenhEbmRPBCddEgWxhT1obaSOaaSkXBWUHYrAftMg85PodxotN5RAk96U6D7nTSnVYFebvt831i4fin9AdU71YSGbTTH2BYOjuk5ko0zCkWvAIQA0YaubdcxaayFlZBWZA3aBwa_Rw-z5lcrgCDRMYsvQfAT3QS8GZBdheS4J9u2Tybl87rw5muZYsnz1Y1BXm1bcaemPPWh-EcZQArwvwxkHkyWeN2SA1MpAIkWRC5sNPFmJct_fpbYg_vhELUW5B3s0X_-qy_z-mz_xN_Tu7U6HuMlXWzS3bGzXl4AehttC-T2_4EYA495A priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | Using a cohort study of diabetes and peripheral artery disease to compare logistic regression and machine learning via random forest modeling |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-022-01774-8 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418976 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2755625583 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2739741813 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9685056 https://doaj.org/article/48631c81ed824144bf4db48f30bb7037 |
Volume | 22 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3daxQxEA_agvgifrtajwiCD7p0sx9J9kl6R0sRrkixUHwJ-dr2oN2td1fBP8L_2Zls9upW7Mtyt5PAJjNJfplMfkPIe1865ypdwt7EZWlZGp9K1rhUy1pLbgthLTr050f88KT8clqdRofbKoZVDnNimKhdZ9FHvpuLCrF6JYvPVz9SzBqFp6sxhcZ9ss0AiWDqBnG62XAxvKEwXJSRfHfFkNw9xfh1kMEvOVqMAmf_vzPzX0vT7bDJW2enYUk6eEweRSxJ93rlPyH3fPuUPJjH0_Jn5HeIB6CaYhbc5ZoGKlnaNXRwuFLdOopUx4Fb4IKG-M5fNB7a0HVHY4g67S8KLSxd-rM-crYNlS9DLCbIo4eF_lxoCsuf6y4pwGFoGA25dkD0nJwc7H-bHaYx_UJqeSbWaQU7MV5zDwiPaVs7LYwU0nPNfVmbLLdOVE3uvHWFMN5kGtELL0RT1awxTV28IFtt1_pXhDbMcu-4rBuNDGJMGuNzLZgtMtnwkiWEDXpQNnKTY4qMCxX2KJKrXncKdKeC7pRMyMdNnauemePO0lNU76YksmqHF93yTMVBqkrJC2Yl804CsAHDbUpnStkUmTEwM4qEfEDjUDj24fOsjlcYoJHIoqX2AAzyWgAGTcjOqCSMWTsWD-al4pyxUjcWnpB3GzHWxDi41nfXWAbwI_QfgzIve2vcNKmAjpSALhMiRnY6avNY0i7OA6N4zSUi4YR8Giz65rP-36ev727FG_Iwx7HGWJoXO2Rrvbz2bwHBrc0kDNMJ2Z7uH309hn8zPpsEbwg856WE5_H0-x8fWEpY |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3dTxQxEG8IJOqL8dtV1JpofNAN2_3odh-IAYUcwl2MgYS32q_FS2AX7w4Nf4T_kn-bM93u4WHkjbfLTZtsO9OZ6XTmN4S8crm1tlA53E1sEue5drFgtY2VqJTgJiuNwYD-cMQHB_mnw-Jwifzua2EwrbLXiV5R29ZgjHwtLQv01QuRvT_9HmPXKHxd7VtoqNBawa57iLFQ2LHrzn_CFW66vvMR-P06Tbe39j8M4tBlIDY8KWdxARcOXnEHjgxTprKq1KIUjivu8konqbFlUafWGZuV2ulEoZHmWVkXFat1jWBMYAJWcgygLJOVza3R5y_zdwyskehLdQRfmzKEl48xgx5o8EssmEPfNeBf2_CXcbycuHnp9dYbxe075HbwZulGJ353yZJr7pEbw_Bef5_88hkJVFHswzuZUQ9mS9ua9iFfqhpLEWzZoxscU59hek7DsxGdtTQkydOuVGls6MQddbm7jZ984rNBgR5iPPTHWFEwwLY9oeCQw8Ko7_YDpAfk4FpY85AsN23jHhNaM8Od5aKqFWKYMaG1S1XJTJaImucsIqzngzQBHR2bdBxLf0sSXHa8k8A76XknRUTezuecdtggV47eRPbORyKut_-jnRzJoCZkLnjGjGDOCnCt4OjUudW5qLNEa9DNZUTeoHBI1D7weUaFIgpYJOJ4yQ1wR3lVghcckdWFkaA1zCK5Fy8ZtNZUXpyxiLyck3EmZuI1rj3DMeDBwv4xGPOok8b5kjLYSAH-bUTKBTldWPMipRl_85jmFRfoi0fkXS_RF5_1_z19cvUqXpCbg_3hntzbGe0-JbdSPHeMxWm2SpZnkzP3DPzJmX4eDi0lX69bT_wB982I9Q |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1baxQxFA7aQvFFvHe0agTBBx06mUsuj-tlqastghb6FnKtC-1M2U4Ff4T_2ZNMZu3UC_i2bE5gknNO8iXnnC8IPXe1tbZRNZxNbJHXtXY5J97migvFqamYMeFCf_-A7h3Wi6Pm6FIVf8x2H0OSQ01DYGlq-90z6wcX53T3nASa9jxkooNFwS9-HW3yRgg4fm3OZovPi3UkIVQpjMUyf-w52ZAib__vq_Ol7elq6uSV-Gnclua30M2EJ_FsMIDb6Jpr76Ct_RQxv4t-xJwArHB4CXfV40gnizuPx0tXrFqLA91x5Bc4wTHH8ztOgRvcdzilqeOhWGhp8ModD9mzbex8GvMxoT3dsuBvS4VhC7TdKQZIDAPD8b0daLqHDufvvrzZy9MTDLmhBetzmFJOBXWA8ogywiqmOeOOKupqoYvSWNb40jpjK6adLlRAMLRivhHEay-q-2ij7Vq3jbAnhjpLufAqsIgRrrUrFSOmKrinNckQGfUgTeInD89knMh4TuFUDrqToDsZdSd5hl6u-5wN7Bz_lH4d1LuWDMza8Y9udSyTo8qa04oYTpzlAG7AeH1tdc19VWgNqyPL0ItgHDL4P3yeUamMAQYZmLTkDAAhFQxwaIZ2JpLgt2baPJqXTOvGuSxZE06kDa8y9GzdHHqGXLjWdRdBBjAkzB8BmQeDNa6HVMFEckCYGWITO52MedrSLr9GVnFBeUDDGXo1WvSvz_r7nD78P_GnaOvT27n8-P7gwyN0owxuSEheVjtoo19duMcA8Hr9JPnwT945SpE |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using+a+cohort+study+of+diabetes+and+peripheral+artery+disease+to+compare+logistic+regression+and+machine+learning+via+random+forest+modeling&rft.jtitle=BMC+medical+research+methodology&rft.au=Austin%2C+Andrea+M&rft.au=Gladders%2C+Niveditta+Ramkumarrbara&rft.au=Barnes%2C+Jonathan+A&rft.au=Eid%2C+Mark+A&rft.date=2022-11-23&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2288&rft.volume=22&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12874-022-01774-8 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2288&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2288&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2288&client=summon |