Mothers In Motion intervention effect on psychosocial health in young, low-income women with overweight or obesity

Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM’s intervention effect on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC public health Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 56 - 10
Main Authors Chang, Mei-Wei, Nitzke, Susan, Brown, Roger
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 14.01.2019
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1471-2458
1471-2458
DOI10.1186/s12889-019-6404-2

Cover

Abstract Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM’s intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Methods Participants ( N  = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n  = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n  = 311). Results At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen’s d ] = 0.53), better emotional coping response ( d  = 0.38), less stress ( d  = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms ( d  = − 0.27), and more positive affect ( d  = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress ( d  = 0.32) and better emotional coping response ( d  = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Conclusions To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress. Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT01839708 ; registered February 28, 2013.
AbstractList Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM’s intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Methods Participants (N = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n = 311). Results At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen’s d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = − 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Conclusions To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress. Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT01839708; registered February 28, 2013.
Abstract Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM’s intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Methods Participants (N = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n = 311). Results At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen’s d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = − 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Conclusions To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress. Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT01839708; registered February 28, 2013.
Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM's intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen's d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = - 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress.
Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM's intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Participants (N = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n = 311). At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen's d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = - 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress. Clinical Trials NCT01839708 ; registered February 28, 2013.
Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM's intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Methods Participants (N = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n = 311). Results At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen's d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = - 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Conclusions To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress. Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT01839708; registered February 28, 2013. Keywords: Low-income women, Stress, Depressive symptoms, Obesity
Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM’s intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Methods Participants ( N  = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n  = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n  = 311). Results At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen’s d ] = 0.53), better emotional coping response ( d  = 0.38), less stress ( d  = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms ( d  = − 0.27), and more positive affect ( d  = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress ( d  = 0.32) and better emotional coping response ( d  = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Conclusions To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress. Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT01839708 ; registered February 28, 2013.
Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM's intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect.BACKGROUNDMothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM's intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect.Participants (N = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n = 311).METHODSParticipants (N = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n = 311).At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen's d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = - 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect.RESULTSAt T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen's d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = - 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect.To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress.CONCLUSIONSTo help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress.Clinical Trials NCT01839708 ; registered February 28, 2013.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinical Trials NCT01839708 ; registered February 28, 2013.
ArticleNumber 56
Audience Academic
Author Chang, Mei-Wei
Brown, Roger
Nitzke, Susan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Mei-Wei
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7819-6096
  surname: Chang
  fullname: Chang, Mei-Wei
  email: chang.1572@osu.edu
  organization: College of Nursing, The Ohio State University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Susan
  surname: Nitzke
  fullname: Nitzke, Susan
  organization: Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Roger
  surname: Brown
  fullname: Brown, Roger
  organization: School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642311$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9klFv0zAUhSM0xLbCD-AFReKFh2XYjuPEL0jTBKPSEC_wbDnOdeIqtYudtuq_53Yd2zoBiuRc2985jm_OeXbig4cse0vJJaWN-JgoaxpZECoLwQkv2IvsjPKaFoxXzcmT-jQ7T2lBCK2bir3KTksiOCspPcvitzANEFM-9zmWLvjc-QniBvzdBKwFM-VYrdLODCEF4_SYD6DHaUA034W17y_yMWwL501YQr7Fwedbh_thA3ELrh_QIeahheSm3evspdVjgjf371n288vnH9dfi9vvN_Prq9vCCFJOBTApOi5bJljTNlzyhpasoVxKQm1XGsFtZ2wlW9G21lYVtxxYRSgXsgbRmnKWzQ--XdALtYpuqeNOBe3U3UKIvdJxcmYEJS0jhkuQvCa867jmLTVdWVHbMFGWHXp9Onit1u0SOoPdiXo8Mj3e8W5QfdgoVDOBwyz7cG8Qw681pEktXTIwjtpDWCfFaC3LitcVQfT9M3QR1tFjq5ASTc15Rfkj1Wu8gPM24Llmb6quKmwTwT9dI3X5FwqfDpbOYJqsw_UjwbunF3244Z_EIEAPgIkhpQj2AaFE7VOpDqlUmEq1T6ViqKmfaYyb9D5f-DVu_K-SHZQJT_E9xMde_Fv0G90Z9Sc
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_16915_jkapesgw_2022_9_36_3_151
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyt_2024_1296433
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_022_04060_4
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu12123606
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu15133023
crossref_primary_10_1177_15248380211021788
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41380_022_01817_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2021_103954
crossref_primary_10_1177_1359105319887780
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40608_019_0236_6
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu15122739
Cites_doi 10.1186/s12906-015-0823-0
10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.015
10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00046.x
10.1016/j.appet.2010.01.014
10.1007/s10995-014-1604-y
10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.051
10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.021
10.1002/oby.21790
10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.02.001
10.2147/PRBM.S164761
10.1177/014662167700100306
10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00912.x
10.1177/0193945911403775
10.1016/j.jada.2008.03.004
10.1093/jnci/djv088
10.2307/2136404
10.1038/oby.2009.213
10.1016/j.conctc.2016.11.004
10.3768/rtipress.2009.mr.0009.0903
10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.11.006
10.1186/s12888-016-0800-2
10.1186/1471-2458-14-280
10.1016/j.jneb.2010.02.012
10.1186/s12889-017-4109-y
10.1002/oby.21862
10.1007/s10995-012-1106-8
10.1001/jama.2017.7092
10.1186/1471-2458-8-76
10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s). 2019
COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright © 2019. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s). 2019
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2019. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7T2
7X7
7XB
88E
8C1
8FE
8FG
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABJCF
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
AN0
ATCPS
AZQEC
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
L6V
M0S
M1P
M7S
PATMY
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PTHSS
PYCSY
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-6404-2
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Public Health Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
British Nursing Database
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials - QC
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
Natural Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central
Proquest Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Medical Database
Engineering Database
Environmental Science Database
Proquest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Engineering Collection
Environmental Science Collection
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
Health & Safety Science Abstracts
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Engineering Collection
Engineering Database
ProQuest Public Health
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
British Nursing Index with Full Text
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
Environmental Science Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database


PubMed


MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Public Health
EISSN 1471-2458
EndPage 10
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_9f20c49e94704dd4a4b1cd351f82633d
PMC6332663
A581408527
30642311
10_1186_s12889_019_6404_2
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States
United States--US
Michigan
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States
– name: Michigan
– name: United States--US
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Institutes of Health
  grantid: R18-DK-083934-01
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002
– fundername: National Institutes of Health
  grantid: R18-DK-083934-01
– fundername: ;
  grantid: R18-DK-083934-01
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
2XV
44B
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
7XC
88E
8C1
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
A8Z
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
ABDBF
ABJCF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AN0
AOIJS
ATCPS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BMC
BNQBC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESTFP
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
L6V
M1P
M48
M7S
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PATMY
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PTHSS
PUEGO
PYCSY
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
U2A
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
AAYXX
ALIPV
CITATION
NPM
PMFND
3V.
7T2
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
C1K
DWQXO
GNUQQ
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c603t-e296d49b2628b849481328149901fd3c64fdcf59b6bbff554f4e25014697e6bc3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1471-2458
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:28:13 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:16:25 EDT 2025
Mon Sep 08 07:03:08 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 19:27:49 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:46:29 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:29:02 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:12:14 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:07:15 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:55:43 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:21:21 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Obesity
Depressive symptoms
Stress
Low-income women
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c603t-e296d49b2628b849481328149901fd3c64fdcf59b6bbff554f4e25014697e6bc3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ORCID 0000-0002-7819-6096
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2168744514?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%&accountid=15518
PMID 30642311
PQID 2168744514
PQPubID 44782
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9f20c49e94704dd4a4b1cd351f82633d
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6332663
proquest_miscellaneous_2179354750
proquest_journals_2168744514
gale_infotracmisc_A581408527
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A581408527
pubmed_primary_30642311
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_019_6404_2
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12889_019_6404_2
springer_journals_10_1186_s12889_019_6404_2
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-01-14
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-01-14
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-01-14
  day: 14
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle BMC public health
PublicationTitleAbbrev BMC Public Health
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Public Health
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BMC
References D Krummel (6404_CR32) 2010; 42
AL McAlister (6404_CR25) 2008
J Ma (6404_CR7) 2010; 18
AR Peden (6404_CR5) 2005; 37
S Horiuchi (6404_CR17) 2018; 11
MW Chang (6404_CR20) 2017; 17
6404_CR2
AC Atanes (6404_CR16) 2015; 15
S Cohen (6404_CR27) 1983; 24
A Winning (6404_CR19) 2015; 66
USDA (6404_CR22) 2014
LS Radloff (6404_CR28) 1977; 1
M Chang (6404_CR24) 2017; 5
MW Chang (6404_CR21) 2017; 25
MW Chang (6404_CR23) 2014; 14
TH Heiskanen (6404_CR10) 2013; 54
LO Walker (6404_CR31) 2012; 34
Centers for Disease C (6404_CR3) 2013; 62
Y Wang (6404_CR15) 2016; 16
DE Dailey (6404_CR6) 2011; 28
H Konttinen (6404_CR13) 2010; 54
JE van der Waerden (6404_CR8) 2013; 91
AM Chao (6404_CR9) 2017; 25
SH Booij (6404_CR18) 2018; 225
Y Zheng (6404_CR1) 2017; 318
MW Chang (6404_CR14) 2015; 19
ML Silveira (6404_CR4) 2013; 17
D Watson (6404_CR29) 1988; 54
H Chakraborty (6404_CR30) 2009
6404_CR26
M Chang (6404_CR11) 2008; 108
C Obel (6404_CR12) 2005; 30
References_xml – volume: 15
  start-page: 303
  year: 2015
  ident: 6404_CR16
  publication-title: BMC Complement Altern Med
  doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0823-0
– volume: 91
  start-page: 84
  year: 2013
  ident: 6404_CR8
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.015
– volume: 62
  start-page: 189
  issue: 10
  year: 2013
  ident: 6404_CR3
  publication-title: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
– volume: 37
  start-page: 268
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  ident: 6404_CR5
  publication-title: J Nurs Scholarsh
  doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00046.x
– volume: 54
  start-page: 473
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: 6404_CR13
  publication-title: Appetite
  doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.01.014
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1047
  issue: 5
  year: 2015
  ident: 6404_CR14
  publication-title: Matern Child Health J
  doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1604-y
– volume: 225
  start-page: 474
  year: 2018
  ident: 6404_CR18
  publication-title: J Affect Disord
  doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.051
– volume-title: Women, infants, and children (WIC) participant and program characteristics
  year: 2014
  ident: 6404_CR22
– volume: 66
  start-page: 1577
  issue: 14
  year: 2015
  ident: 6404_CR19
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.021
– volume: 25
  start-page: 713
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: 6404_CR9
  publication-title: Obesity
  doi: 10.1002/oby.21790
– volume: 54
  start-page: 599
  issue: 6
  year: 2013
  ident: 6404_CR10
  publication-title: Compr Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.02.001
– volume: 11
  start-page: 299
  year: 2018
  ident: 6404_CR17
  publication-title: Psychol Res Behav Manag
  doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S164761
– volume: 1
  start-page: 385
  issue: 35
  year: 1977
  ident: 6404_CR28
  publication-title: Appl Psychol Meas
  doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306
– volume: 28
  start-page: 203
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: 6404_CR6
  publication-title: Public Health Nurs
  doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00912.x
– volume: 34
  start-page: 654
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: 6404_CR31
  publication-title: West J Nurs Res
  doi: 10.1177/0193945911403775
– volume: 108
  start-page: 1023
  issue: 6
  year: 2008
  ident: 6404_CR11
  publication-title: J Am Diet Assoc
  doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.03.004
– start-page: 169
  volume-title: Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice
  year: 2008
  ident: 6404_CR25
– ident: 6404_CR2
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv088
– volume: 24
  start-page: 385
  issue: 4
  year: 1983
  ident: 6404_CR27
  publication-title: J Health Soc Behav
  doi: 10.2307/2136404
– volume: 18
  start-page: 347
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  ident: 6404_CR7
  publication-title: Obesity
  doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.213
– volume: 5
  start-page: 26
  year: 2017
  ident: 6404_CR24
  publication-title: Contemp Clin Trials Commun
  doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.11.004
– volume-title: A mixed model approach for intent-to-treat analysis in longitudinal clinical trials with missing values
  year: 2009
  ident: 6404_CR30
  doi: 10.3768/rtipress.2009.mr.0009.0903
– volume: 30
  start-page: 647
  issue: 7
  year: 2005
  ident: 6404_CR12
  publication-title: Psychoneuroendocrinology
  doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.11.006
– volume: 16
  start-page: 88
  year: 2016
  ident: 6404_CR15
  publication-title: BMC Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0800-2
– volume: 14
  start-page: 280
  year: 2014
  ident: 6404_CR23
  publication-title: BMC Public Health
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-280
– volume: 42
  start-page: S52
  issue: 3 Suppl
  year: 2010
  ident: 6404_CR32
  publication-title: J Nutr Educ Behav
  doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.02.012
– volume: 17
  start-page: 182
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 6404_CR20
  publication-title: BMC Public Health
  doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4109-y
– volume: 25
  start-page: 2055
  issue: 12
  year: 2017
  ident: 6404_CR21
  publication-title: Obesity
  doi: 10.1002/oby.21862
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1138
  issue: 6
  year: 2013
  ident: 6404_CR4
  publication-title: Matern Child Health J
  doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1106-8
– volume: 318
  start-page: 255
  issue: 3
  year: 2017
  ident: 6404_CR1
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7092
– ident: 6404_CR26
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-76
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1063
  issue: 6
  year: 1988
  ident: 6404_CR29
  publication-title: J Pers Soc Psychol
  doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
SSID ssj0017852
Score 2.3212438
Snippet Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent...
Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight...
Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent...
Abstract Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 56
SubjectTerms Behavior
Biostatistics
Body weight
Care and treatment
Children
Clinical trials
Community mental health services
Coping
Depression (Mood disorder)
Depressive symptoms
Eating behavior
Effectiveness
Emotions
Environmental Health
Epidemiology
Evaluation
Exercise
Health aspects
Health behavior
Health care
health promotion and society
Income
Infants
Intervention
Low income groups
Low-income women
Management
Medical research
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental depression
Methods
Nutrition
Obesity
Overweight
Overweight persons
Physical activity
Physical fitness
Poor women
Prevention
Psychological aspects
Public Health
Research Article
Social interactions
Social support
Stress
Stress (Psychology)
Stress management
Studies
Type 2 diabetes
Vaccine
Womens health
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3daxQxEA_SJ0HEb1erRBAENTRfm908VrFU4Xyy0LewSTZYqLvl7or0v-9MsnfeVtQX35bNBJLMZDKTzPyGkNdNUknpqFhKVjPtecesT5KJFHsLDkQyHvOdF1_N8Yn-clqf7pT6wpiwAg9cFu7AJsmDttCx4TpG3WkvQlS1SGAYKxVR-3LLN87U9H7QtLWc3jBFaw5WoIUxNEhYZjTXTM5OoQzW_7tK3jmTbsZL3ng0zWfR0T1ydzIi6WEZ_H1yqx8ekDvlBo6WxKKHZLnIyVUr-nmgi1yrh57tBDjSEslB4atkYpXbc1oSI4GUXqEieE_Px58MIRx-9DTDNVC8uqVjDqhGz56OSzqW8gKPyMnRp28fj9lUYYEFw9Wa9dKaqK2XRra-RaQYcE5bcJrASkhRBaNTDKm23nifElgeSfcSXyKNbXrjg3pM9oZx6J8SCnZDKwwwBfF6uqbruMcIVWVNm6I2dUX4ZsVdmODHsQrGuctuSGtcYZIDJjlkkpMVebvtclGwN_5G_AHZuCVE2Oz8A4TJTcLk_iVMFXmDQuBwc8PgQjflKMAUESbLHdYIEAay1VRkf0YJmzLMmzdi5CalsHJSGCw2ACZqRV5tm7EnBroN_XiJNKAwaw12XEWeFKnbTik7i0qIijQzeZzNed4ynH3PkOEwObDEVEXebST317D-uKTP_seSPie3Je47LpjQ-2RvvbzsX4Adt_Yv85a9Bi4hQn8
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3_a9UwEA_z7RdBxO9Wp0QQBDWs-dK0-UFkk40pvIeIg_0WmqaZg9nOtzfE_967pH1bJ-630lwhae4ud7m7zxHyugwySOUlC8EoplxeM-OCYDz41oADEbTDeuf5Qh8cqi9HxdEGWYy1MJhWOerEqKh93-Ad-bbgGpHa4Xz_ePaLYdcojK6OLTTqobWC_xAhxm6RTVDJRT4jm7t7i6_f1nGFsirEENvkld4-B-2MKUPcMK1yxcTkdIog_v-q6itn1fU8ymvB1HhG7d8jdwfjku4kbrhPNtruAbmTbuZoKjh6SJbzWHR1Tj93dB57-NCTK4mPNGV4UHhKFVrpVp2mgkkgpX9QQbynp_1vhtAOP1saYRwoXunSPiZao8dP-yXtU9uBR-Rwf-_7pwM2dF5gjc7lirXCaK-ME1pUrkIEGXBaK3CmwHoIXjZaBd-EwjjtXAhgkQTVCoxQalO22jXyMZl1fdc-JRTsiYrrUAnE8anLus4dZq5Ko6vglS4yko9_3DYDLDl2xzi10T2ptE2bZGGTLG6SFRl5u_7kLGFy3ES8i9u4JkQ47fiiXx7bQTqtCSJvlAHuLHPlvaqV442XBYd5ayl9Rt4gE1gUephcUw-1C7BEhM-yOwUChwFvlRnZmlCCsDbT4ZGN7KAszu0la2fk1XoYv8QEuK7tL5AGFGmhwL7LyJPEdeslRSdScp6RcsKPkzVPR7qTHxFKHBYHFprMyLuRcy-n9d9f-uzmRTwntwVKVM4ZV1tktlpetC_Aclu5l4M4_gWcW0DU
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  dbid: C6C
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3di9QwEB_kBBFE9PyqnhJBENRg89G0eTwXj1NYnzy4t9C0DR6crezucdx_70zSrdvzA3xbNhNIOpPJTGbmNwCvyqCC0q3iIVjNtc9rbn2QXIS2s-hABOOp3nn5xRyf6M-nxekIFk21MLvxe1GZ92vUn5TUIyw3Otccte3NAvUuCfPCLKaAQVkVcgxa_nHa7NqJ6Py_6-CdS-h6guS1KGm8fI7uwd3RamSHic334UbX78Ot5RgX34c76fWNpaKiB7BaxsKqNfvUs2Xs08POdpIbWcriYPgrVWGll3OWiiKRlF2REnjHzodLTvAN3zsWoRoYPduyISZTk1fPhhUbUmuBh3By9PHr4piP3RV4Y3K14Z20ptXWSyMrXxFKDDqmFTpMaCGEVjVGh7YJhfXG-xDQ6gi6kxSFNLbsjG_UI9jrh757AgxthkqYUEnC6qnLus49Zacqa6rQalNkkG8_vmtG6HHqgHHuogtSGZf45ZBfjvjlZAZvpik_Eu7Gv4g_EEcnQoLMjn-gJLnxBDobZN5oixJY5rptda29aFpVCFy3UarN4DXJg6ODjYtr6rE-AbdIEFnusCBwMBSzMoODGSUeyGY-vJUoNyqEtZPCUKMBNE8zeDkN00xKcuu74YJoUFkWGm24DB4nAZy2FB1FJUQG5Uw0Z3uej_Rn3yJcOG4OrTCVwdutEP9a1l8_6dP_on4GtyWdtVxwoQ9gb7O66J6jsbbxL-Ix_QmM9zYH
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Mothers In Motion intervention effect on psychosocial health in young, low-income women with overweight or obesity
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-019-6404-2
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642311
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2168744514
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2179354750
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6332663
https://doaj.org/article/9f20c49e94704dd4a4b1cd351f82633d
Volume 19
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELfG9oKEEN8ERmUkJCTALP6IEz8g1FYrA6kTmqg08WLFSQyTSgJtJ9h_z52TdssYe7GS2qn8cXe-s-9-R8iL1EsvVSmZ90Yx5eKcGecF476sDBgQXjuMd54e6oOZ-nScHG-RdXqrbgKXV5p2mE9qtpi__fPr7D0w_LvA8JneW4KMRccfbphWsWIgkXfCdRF68qnzS4U0Cwl4OMhjJlSSdZecV_5Fb5sKaP7_yuwLm9Zlh8pLt6phs5rcIbc7LZMOW7K4S7aq-h651R7R0Tby6D5ZTEP01ZJ-rOk0JPOhJxc8IGnr6kHhqQ3Vao_XaRs5CU3pGUqKN3Te_GaI8fCjogHPgeLZLm2CxzWa_rRZ0KbNP_CAzCb7X8YHrEvBwAodyxWrhNGlMk5okbkMoWTAes3AqgI1wpey0MqXhU-M0855D6qJV5XAq0pt0kq7Qj4k23VTV48JBcUi49pnAgF98jTPY4curNLozJdKJxGJ1zNuiw6fHNNkzG2wUzJt20WysEgWF8mKiLzafPKzBee4rvEIl3HTEHG1ww_N4pvt2NQaL-JCGSDTNFZlqXLleFHKhEO_tZRlRF4iEVikR-hckXdBDDBExNGywwQRxIDO0ojs9loC1xb96jUZ2TXRW8E1ZiMAHTYizzfV-CV6wtVVc4ptQKImChS9iDxqqW4zpGBNSs4jkvbosTfmfk198j1gisPgQFWTEXm9ptzzbv13Sp9cP8an5KZAjoo542qXbK8Wp9UzUOFWbkBupMcplNmYYzn5MCA7o_3Dz0fwNtbjQTgaGQT2hfJo9BXKmRj-BSxbRtg
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fb9QwDLfG7QEkhPhPYUCQQEhAtDZN0_ZhQhtsumO7E0KbtLfQNA1MGu242zTty_HZsNPebR1ib3s7Nekprh07duyfAV6nLnaxtDF3LpdcmrDguXGCR85WOToQThmqdx5P1HBPftlP9pfgz7wWhtIq5zrRK2rblBQjXxWRIqR2tO8fj35z6hpFt6vzFhpF11rBrnmIsa6wY7s6O0UXbrY2-oz8fiPE1ubupyHvugzwUoXxMa9ErqzMjVAiMxmhpaCDlqHjgJbS2bhU0tnSJblRxjiH1tfJStBtnMrTSpkyxv-9AcuSAigDWN7YnHz9trjHSLNEdHepUaZWZ2gNKEUpyrmSoeSiZw1904B_TcMF23g5b_PS5a23iVt34U53mGXrrfTdg6Wqvg-320ggawucHsB07Iu8ZmxUs7HvGcQOLiRasjajhOGvtiKsjeKztkATp7IzUkgf2GFzyglK4lfFPGwEoxAya3xiN0UYWDNlTdvm4CHsXQsPHsGgburqCTA8v2SRcpkg3KAiLYrQUKZsnKvMWamSAML5F9dlB4NO3TgOtXeHMqVbJmlkkiYmaRHAu8UrRy0GyFWTN4iNi4kE3-0fNNMfutMGOnciLGWOuyENpbWykCYqbZxEuG4VxzaAtyQEmpQMLq4suloJJJHguvR6QkBlKFtpACu9magcyv7wXIx0p5xm-nwrBfBqMUxvUsJdXTUnNAcVdyLxPBnA41bqFiR5pzWOogDSnjz2aO6P1Ac_PXQ5EocnwjiA93PJPV_Wfz_p06uJeAk3h7vjHb0zmmw_g1uCdlcY8UiuwOB4elI9x1PjsXnRbU0G369bG_wF7Px8nw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3daxQxEA9SoQhStH5trRpBENTQ3SSb3TyeH0erXvHBg76FzWajhbpb7q6I_70zye7arR_g23GZQLKZmcxkZn5DyLPCCy-kE8x7LZm0acW09Zxl3jUaHAivLNY7L47V4VK-P8lP-j6n6yHbfQhJxpoGRGlqNwfnzkcRL9XBGrQqpvpkmimZSgY6-LqEqxpzupZ8NoYRijLnfSjzj9Mml1HA7P9dM1-6mq6mTV6JnYYraX6L7PS2JJ3Fw79NrjXtLtle9NHyXXIzvsnRWGp0h6wWodxqTY9augjde-jppZRHGnM7KPyKtVnxPZ3GUkkgpT9QNbyiZ913hqAO3xoaABwoPubSLqRYo69PuxXtYsOBu2Q5f_f5zSHrey6wWqViwxqulZPacsVLWyJ2DLirJbhRYDd4J2olvat9rq2y1nuwRbxsOMYmlS4aZWtxj2y1Xds8IBQsiTJTvuSI4FMVVZVazFkVWpXeSZUnJB0-vql7QHLsi3FmgmNSKhPPy8B5GTwvwxPyYpxyHtE4_kX8Gk90JEQg7fBHt_pierk02vO0lhr4skilc7KSNqudyDNYtxLCJeQ58oNBcYfF1VVftQBbROAsM8sRMgzYrEjI_oQSxLSeDg8cZXo1sTY8U9h-AIzWhDwdh3Empr61TXeBNKBCcwmWXULuRwYctxTcR5FlCSkmrDnZ83SkPf0aQMRhc2CbiYS8HJj417L--kn3_ov6Cdn-9HZuPh4df3hIbnAUuzRjmdwnW5vVRfMIrLmNfRwk9iecxEFc
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mothers+In+Motion+intervention+effect+on+psychosocial+health+in+young%2C+low-income+women+with+overweight+or+obesity&rft.jtitle=BMC+public+health&rft.au=Chang%2C+Mei-Wei&rft.au=Nitzke%2C+Susan&rft.au=Brown%2C+Roger&rft.date=2019-01-14&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12889-019-6404-2&rft.externalDocID=A581408527
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2458&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2458&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2458&client=summon