Mothers In Motion intervention effect on psychosocial health in young, low-income women with overweight or obesity
Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM’s intervention effect on...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC public health Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 56 - 10 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
14.01.2019
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1471-2458 1471-2458 |
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-6404-2 |
Cover
Abstract | Background
Mothers in Motion (MIM),
a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the
MIM’s
intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect.
Methods
Participants (
N
= 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2,
n
= 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3,
n
= 311).
Results
At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen’s
d
] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (
d
= 0.38), less stress (
d
= 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (
d
= − 0.27), and more positive affect (
d
= 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (
d
= 0.32) and better emotional coping response (
d
= 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect.
Conclusions
To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress.
Trial registration
Clinical Trials
NCT01839708
; registered February 28, 2013. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM’s intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Methods Participants (N = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n = 311). Results At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen’s d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = − 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Conclusions To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress. Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT01839708; registered February 28, 2013. Abstract Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM’s intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Methods Participants (N = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n = 311). Results At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen’s d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = − 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Conclusions To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress. Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT01839708; registered February 28, 2013. Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM's intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen's d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = - 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress. Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM's intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Participants (N = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n = 311). At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen's d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = - 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress. Clinical Trials NCT01839708 ; registered February 28, 2013. Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM's intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Methods Participants (N = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n = 311). Results At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen's d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = - 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Conclusions To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress. Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT01839708; registered February 28, 2013. Keywords: Low-income women, Stress, Depressive symptoms, Obesity Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM’s intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Methods Participants ( N = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n = 311). Results At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen’s d ] = 0.53), better emotional coping response ( d = 0.38), less stress ( d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms ( d = − 0.27), and more positive affect ( d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress ( d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response ( d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Conclusions To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress. Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT01839708 ; registered February 28, 2013. Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM's intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect.BACKGROUNDMothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM's intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect.Participants (N = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n = 311).METHODSParticipants (N = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n = 311).At T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen's d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = - 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect.RESULTSAt T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen's d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = - 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect.To help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress.CONCLUSIONSTo help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress.Clinical Trials NCT01839708 ; registered February 28, 2013.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinical Trials NCT01839708 ; registered February 28, 2013. |
ArticleNumber | 56 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Chang, Mei-Wei Brown, Roger Nitzke, Susan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Mei-Wei orcidid: 0000-0002-7819-6096 surname: Chang fullname: Chang, Mei-Wei email: chang.1572@osu.edu organization: College of Nursing, The Ohio State University – sequence: 2 givenname: Susan surname: Nitzke fullname: Nitzke, Susan organization: Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison – sequence: 3 givenname: Roger surname: Brown fullname: Brown, Roger organization: School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642311$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9klFv0zAUhSM0xLbCD-AFReKFh2XYjuPEL0jTBKPSEC_wbDnOdeIqtYudtuq_53Yd2zoBiuRc2985jm_OeXbig4cse0vJJaWN-JgoaxpZECoLwQkv2IvsjPKaFoxXzcmT-jQ7T2lBCK2bir3KTksiOCspPcvitzANEFM-9zmWLvjc-QniBvzdBKwFM-VYrdLODCEF4_SYD6DHaUA034W17y_yMWwL501YQr7Fwedbh_thA3ELrh_QIeahheSm3evspdVjgjf371n288vnH9dfi9vvN_Prq9vCCFJOBTApOi5bJljTNlzyhpasoVxKQm1XGsFtZ2wlW9G21lYVtxxYRSgXsgbRmnKWzQ--XdALtYpuqeNOBe3U3UKIvdJxcmYEJS0jhkuQvCa867jmLTVdWVHbMFGWHXp9Onit1u0SOoPdiXo8Mj3e8W5QfdgoVDOBwyz7cG8Qw681pEktXTIwjtpDWCfFaC3LitcVQfT9M3QR1tFjq5ASTc15Rfkj1Wu8gPM24Llmb6quKmwTwT9dI3X5FwqfDpbOYJqsw_UjwbunF3244Z_EIEAPgIkhpQj2AaFE7VOpDqlUmEq1T6ViqKmfaYyb9D5f-DVu_K-SHZQJT_E9xMde_Fv0G90Z9Sc |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_16915_jkapesgw_2022_9_36_3_151 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyt_2024_1296433 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_022_04060_4 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu12123606 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu15133023 crossref_primary_10_1177_15248380211021788 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41380_022_01817_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2021_103954 crossref_primary_10_1177_1359105319887780 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40608_019_0236_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu15122739 |
Cites_doi | 10.1186/s12906-015-0823-0 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.015 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00046.x 10.1016/j.appet.2010.01.014 10.1007/s10995-014-1604-y 10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.051 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.021 10.1002/oby.21790 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.02.001 10.2147/PRBM.S164761 10.1177/014662167700100306 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00912.x 10.1177/0193945911403775 10.1016/j.jada.2008.03.004 10.1093/jnci/djv088 10.2307/2136404 10.1038/oby.2009.213 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.11.004 10.3768/rtipress.2009.mr.0009.0903 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.11.006 10.1186/s12888-016-0800-2 10.1186/1471-2458-14-280 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.02.012 10.1186/s12889-017-4109-y 10.1002/oby.21862 10.1007/s10995-012-1106-8 10.1001/jama.2017.7092 10.1186/1471-2458-8-76 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s). 2019 COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd. Copyright © 2019. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s). 2019 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: Copyright © 2019. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7T2 7X7 7XB 88E 8C1 8FE 8FG 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AN0 ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI C1K CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. L6V M0S M1P M7S PATMY PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PTHSS PYCSY 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-6404-2 |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Public Health Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland British Nursing Database Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials - QC ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One ProQuest Central Proquest Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Engineering Collection Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) Medical Database Engineering Database Environmental Science Database Proquest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Collection Environmental Science Collection MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Engineering Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection Health & Safety Science Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Engineering Collection Engineering Database ProQuest Public Health ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition British Nursing Index with Full Text ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Materials Science & Engineering Collection Environmental Science Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Public Health |
EISSN | 1471-2458 |
EndPage | 10 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_9f20c49e94704dd4a4b1cd351f82633d PMC6332663 A581408527 30642311 10_1186_s12889_019_6404_2 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United States United States--US Michigan |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States – name: Michigan – name: United States--US |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Institutes of Health grantid: R18-DK-083934-01 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002 – fundername: National Institutes of Health grantid: R18-DK-083934-01 – fundername: ; grantid: R18-DK-083934-01 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 2XV 44B 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7X7 7XC 88E 8C1 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABJCF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AN0 AOIJS ATCPS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BGLVJ BHPHI BMC BNQBC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESTFP ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 L6V M1P M48 M7S M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PATMY PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PUEGO PYCSY RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS U2A UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB AAYXX ALIPV CITATION NPM PMFND 3V. 7T2 7XB 8FK AZQEC C1K DWQXO GNUQQ K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c603t-e296d49b2628b849481328149901fd3c64fdcf59b6bbff554f4e25014697e6bc3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1471-2458 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:28:13 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:16:25 EDT 2025 Mon Sep 08 07:03:08 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 19:27:49 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:46:29 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:29:02 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:12:14 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:07:15 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:55:43 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:21:21 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Obesity Depressive symptoms Stress Low-income women |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c603t-e296d49b2628b849481328149901fd3c64fdcf59b6bbff554f4e25014697e6bc3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-7819-6096 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2168744514?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%&accountid=15518 |
PMID | 30642311 |
PQID | 2168744514 |
PQPubID | 44782 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9f20c49e94704dd4a4b1cd351f82633d pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6332663 proquest_miscellaneous_2179354750 proquest_journals_2168744514 gale_infotracmisc_A581408527 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A581408527 pubmed_primary_30642311 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_019_6404_2 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12889_019_6404_2 springer_journals_10_1186_s12889_019_6404_2 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-01-14 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-01-14 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2019 text: 2019-01-14 day: 14 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
PublicationTitle | BMC public health |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMC Public Health |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Public Health |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
References | D Krummel (6404_CR32) 2010; 42 AL McAlister (6404_CR25) 2008 J Ma (6404_CR7) 2010; 18 AR Peden (6404_CR5) 2005; 37 S Horiuchi (6404_CR17) 2018; 11 MW Chang (6404_CR20) 2017; 17 6404_CR2 AC Atanes (6404_CR16) 2015; 15 S Cohen (6404_CR27) 1983; 24 A Winning (6404_CR19) 2015; 66 USDA (6404_CR22) 2014 LS Radloff (6404_CR28) 1977; 1 M Chang (6404_CR24) 2017; 5 MW Chang (6404_CR21) 2017; 25 MW Chang (6404_CR23) 2014; 14 TH Heiskanen (6404_CR10) 2013; 54 LO Walker (6404_CR31) 2012; 34 Centers for Disease C (6404_CR3) 2013; 62 Y Wang (6404_CR15) 2016; 16 DE Dailey (6404_CR6) 2011; 28 H Konttinen (6404_CR13) 2010; 54 JE van der Waerden (6404_CR8) 2013; 91 AM Chao (6404_CR9) 2017; 25 SH Booij (6404_CR18) 2018; 225 Y Zheng (6404_CR1) 2017; 318 MW Chang (6404_CR14) 2015; 19 ML Silveira (6404_CR4) 2013; 17 D Watson (6404_CR29) 1988; 54 H Chakraborty (6404_CR30) 2009 6404_CR26 M Chang (6404_CR11) 2008; 108 C Obel (6404_CR12) 2005; 30 |
References_xml | – volume: 15 start-page: 303 year: 2015 ident: 6404_CR16 publication-title: BMC Complement Altern Med doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0823-0 – volume: 91 start-page: 84 year: 2013 ident: 6404_CR8 publication-title: Soc Sci Med doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.015 – volume: 62 start-page: 189 issue: 10 year: 2013 ident: 6404_CR3 publication-title: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep – volume: 37 start-page: 268 issue: 3 year: 2005 ident: 6404_CR5 publication-title: J Nurs Scholarsh doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00046.x – volume: 54 start-page: 473 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: 6404_CR13 publication-title: Appetite doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.01.014 – volume: 19 start-page: 1047 issue: 5 year: 2015 ident: 6404_CR14 publication-title: Matern Child Health J doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1604-y – volume: 225 start-page: 474 year: 2018 ident: 6404_CR18 publication-title: J Affect Disord doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.051 – volume-title: Women, infants, and children (WIC) participant and program characteristics year: 2014 ident: 6404_CR22 – volume: 66 start-page: 1577 issue: 14 year: 2015 ident: 6404_CR19 publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.021 – volume: 25 start-page: 713 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: 6404_CR9 publication-title: Obesity doi: 10.1002/oby.21790 – volume: 54 start-page: 599 issue: 6 year: 2013 ident: 6404_CR10 publication-title: Compr Psychiatry doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.02.001 – volume: 11 start-page: 299 year: 2018 ident: 6404_CR17 publication-title: Psychol Res Behav Manag doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S164761 – volume: 1 start-page: 385 issue: 35 year: 1977 ident: 6404_CR28 publication-title: Appl Psychol Meas doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306 – volume: 28 start-page: 203 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 6404_CR6 publication-title: Public Health Nurs doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00912.x – volume: 34 start-page: 654 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: 6404_CR31 publication-title: West J Nurs Res doi: 10.1177/0193945911403775 – volume: 108 start-page: 1023 issue: 6 year: 2008 ident: 6404_CR11 publication-title: J Am Diet Assoc doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.03.004 – start-page: 169 volume-title: Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice year: 2008 ident: 6404_CR25 – ident: 6404_CR2 doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv088 – volume: 24 start-page: 385 issue: 4 year: 1983 ident: 6404_CR27 publication-title: J Health Soc Behav doi: 10.2307/2136404 – volume: 18 start-page: 347 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: 6404_CR7 publication-title: Obesity doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.213 – volume: 5 start-page: 26 year: 2017 ident: 6404_CR24 publication-title: Contemp Clin Trials Commun doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.11.004 – volume-title: A mixed model approach for intent-to-treat analysis in longitudinal clinical trials with missing values year: 2009 ident: 6404_CR30 doi: 10.3768/rtipress.2009.mr.0009.0903 – volume: 30 start-page: 647 issue: 7 year: 2005 ident: 6404_CR12 publication-title: Psychoneuroendocrinology doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.11.006 – volume: 16 start-page: 88 year: 2016 ident: 6404_CR15 publication-title: BMC Psychiatry doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0800-2 – volume: 14 start-page: 280 year: 2014 ident: 6404_CR23 publication-title: BMC Public Health doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-280 – volume: 42 start-page: S52 issue: 3 Suppl year: 2010 ident: 6404_CR32 publication-title: J Nutr Educ Behav doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.02.012 – volume: 17 start-page: 182 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 6404_CR20 publication-title: BMC Public Health doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4109-y – volume: 25 start-page: 2055 issue: 12 year: 2017 ident: 6404_CR21 publication-title: Obesity doi: 10.1002/oby.21862 – volume: 17 start-page: 1138 issue: 6 year: 2013 ident: 6404_CR4 publication-title: Matern Child Health J doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1106-8 – volume: 318 start-page: 255 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 6404_CR1 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7092 – ident: 6404_CR26 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-76 – volume: 54 start-page: 1063 issue: 6 year: 1988 ident: 6404_CR29 publication-title: J Pers Soc Psychol doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 |
SSID | ssj0017852 |
Score | 2.3212438 |
Snippet | Background
Mothers in Motion (MIM),
a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent... Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight... Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent... Abstract Background Mothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 56 |
SubjectTerms | Behavior Biostatistics Body weight Care and treatment Children Clinical trials Community mental health services Coping Depression (Mood disorder) Depressive symptoms Eating behavior Effectiveness Emotions Environmental Health Epidemiology Evaluation Exercise Health aspects Health behavior Health care health promotion and society Income Infants Intervention Low income groups Low-income women Management Medical research Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mental depression Methods Nutrition Obesity Overweight Overweight persons Physical activity Physical fitness Poor women Prevention Psychological aspects Public Health Research Article Social interactions Social support Stress Stress (Psychology) Stress management Studies Type 2 diabetes Vaccine Womens health |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3daxQxEA_SJ0HEb1erRBAENTRfm908VrFU4Xyy0LewSTZYqLvl7or0v-9MsnfeVtQX35bNBJLMZDKTzPyGkNdNUknpqFhKVjPtecesT5KJFHsLDkQyHvOdF1_N8Yn-clqf7pT6wpiwAg9cFu7AJsmDttCx4TpG3WkvQlS1SGAYKxVR-3LLN87U9H7QtLWc3jBFaw5WoIUxNEhYZjTXTM5OoQzW_7tK3jmTbsZL3ng0zWfR0T1ydzIi6WEZ_H1yqx8ekDvlBo6WxKKHZLnIyVUr-nmgi1yrh57tBDjSEslB4atkYpXbc1oSI4GUXqEieE_Px58MIRx-9DTDNVC8uqVjDqhGz56OSzqW8gKPyMnRp28fj9lUYYEFw9Wa9dKaqK2XRra-RaQYcE5bcJrASkhRBaNTDKm23nifElgeSfcSXyKNbXrjg3pM9oZx6J8SCnZDKwwwBfF6uqbruMcIVWVNm6I2dUX4ZsVdmODHsQrGuctuSGtcYZIDJjlkkpMVebvtclGwN_5G_AHZuCVE2Oz8A4TJTcLk_iVMFXmDQuBwc8PgQjflKMAUESbLHdYIEAay1VRkf0YJmzLMmzdi5CalsHJSGCw2ACZqRV5tm7EnBroN_XiJNKAwaw12XEWeFKnbTik7i0qIijQzeZzNed4ynH3PkOEwObDEVEXebST317D-uKTP_seSPie3Je47LpjQ-2RvvbzsX4Adt_Yv85a9Bi4hQn8 priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3_a9UwEA_z7RdBxO9Wp0QQBDWs-dK0-UFkk40pvIeIg_0WmqaZg9nOtzfE_967pH1bJ-630lwhae4ud7m7zxHyugwySOUlC8EoplxeM-OCYDz41oADEbTDeuf5Qh8cqi9HxdEGWYy1MJhWOerEqKh93-Ad-bbgGpHa4Xz_ePaLYdcojK6OLTTqobWC_xAhxm6RTVDJRT4jm7t7i6_f1nGFsirEENvkld4-B-2MKUPcMK1yxcTkdIog_v-q6itn1fU8ymvB1HhG7d8jdwfjku4kbrhPNtruAbmTbuZoKjh6SJbzWHR1Tj93dB57-NCTK4mPNGV4UHhKFVrpVp2mgkkgpX9QQbynp_1vhtAOP1saYRwoXunSPiZao8dP-yXtU9uBR-Rwf-_7pwM2dF5gjc7lirXCaK-ME1pUrkIEGXBaK3CmwHoIXjZaBd-EwjjtXAhgkQTVCoxQalO22jXyMZl1fdc-JRTsiYrrUAnE8anLus4dZq5Ko6vglS4yko9_3DYDLDl2xzi10T2ptE2bZGGTLG6SFRl5u_7kLGFy3ES8i9u4JkQ47fiiXx7bQTqtCSJvlAHuLHPlvaqV442XBYd5ayl9Rt4gE1gUephcUw-1C7BEhM-yOwUChwFvlRnZmlCCsDbT4ZGN7KAszu0la2fk1XoYv8QEuK7tL5AGFGmhwL7LyJPEdeslRSdScp6RcsKPkzVPR7qTHxFKHBYHFprMyLuRcy-n9d9f-uzmRTwntwVKVM4ZV1tktlpetC_Aclu5l4M4_gWcW0DU priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3di9QwEB_kBBFE9PyqnhJBENRg89G0eTwXj1NYnzy4t9C0DR6crezucdx_70zSrdvzA3xbNhNIOpPJTGbmNwCvyqCC0q3iIVjNtc9rbn2QXIS2s-hABOOp3nn5xRyf6M-nxekIFk21MLvxe1GZ92vUn5TUIyw3Otccte3NAvUuCfPCLKaAQVkVcgxa_nHa7NqJ6Py_6-CdS-h6guS1KGm8fI7uwd3RamSHic334UbX78Ot5RgX34c76fWNpaKiB7BaxsKqNfvUs2Xs08POdpIbWcriYPgrVWGll3OWiiKRlF2REnjHzodLTvAN3zsWoRoYPduyISZTk1fPhhUbUmuBh3By9PHr4piP3RV4Y3K14Z20ptXWSyMrXxFKDDqmFTpMaCGEVjVGh7YJhfXG-xDQ6gi6kxSFNLbsjG_UI9jrh757AgxthkqYUEnC6qnLus49Zacqa6rQalNkkG8_vmtG6HHqgHHuogtSGZf45ZBfjvjlZAZvpik_Eu7Gv4g_EEcnQoLMjn-gJLnxBDobZN5oixJY5rptda29aFpVCFy3UarN4DXJg6ODjYtr6rE-AbdIEFnusCBwMBSzMoODGSUeyGY-vJUoNyqEtZPCUKMBNE8zeDkN00xKcuu74YJoUFkWGm24DB4nAZy2FB1FJUQG5Uw0Z3uej_Rn3yJcOG4OrTCVwdutEP9a1l8_6dP_on4GtyWdtVxwoQ9gb7O66J6jsbbxL-Ix_QmM9zYH priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | Mothers In Motion intervention effect on psychosocial health in young, low-income women with overweight or obesity |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-019-6404-2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642311 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2168744514 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2179354750 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6332663 https://doaj.org/article/9f20c49e94704dd4a4b1cd351f82633d |
Volume | 19 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELfG9oKEEN8ERmUkJCTALP6IEz8g1FYrA6kTmqg08WLFSQyTSgJtJ9h_z52TdssYe7GS2qn8cXe-s-9-R8iL1EsvVSmZ90Yx5eKcGecF476sDBgQXjuMd54e6oOZ-nScHG-RdXqrbgKXV5p2mE9qtpi__fPr7D0w_LvA8JneW4KMRccfbphWsWIgkXfCdRF68qnzS4U0Cwl4OMhjJlSSdZecV_5Fb5sKaP7_yuwLm9Zlh8pLt6phs5rcIbc7LZMOW7K4S7aq-h651R7R0Tby6D5ZTEP01ZJ-rOk0JPOhJxc8IGnr6kHhqQ3Vao_XaRs5CU3pGUqKN3Te_GaI8fCjogHPgeLZLm2CxzWa_rRZ0KbNP_CAzCb7X8YHrEvBwAodyxWrhNGlMk5okbkMoWTAes3AqgI1wpey0MqXhU-M0855D6qJV5XAq0pt0kq7Qj4k23VTV48JBcUi49pnAgF98jTPY4curNLozJdKJxGJ1zNuiw6fHNNkzG2wUzJt20WysEgWF8mKiLzafPKzBee4rvEIl3HTEHG1ww_N4pvt2NQaL-JCGSDTNFZlqXLleFHKhEO_tZRlRF4iEVikR-hckXdBDDBExNGywwQRxIDO0ojs9loC1xb96jUZ2TXRW8E1ZiMAHTYizzfV-CV6wtVVc4ptQKImChS9iDxqqW4zpGBNSs4jkvbosTfmfk198j1gisPgQFWTEXm9ptzzbv13Sp9cP8an5KZAjoo542qXbK8Wp9UzUOFWbkBupMcplNmYYzn5MCA7o_3Dz0fwNtbjQTgaGQT2hfJo9BXKmRj-BSxbRtg |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fb9QwDLfG7QEkhPhPYUCQQEhAtDZN0_ZhQhtsumO7E0KbtLfQNA1MGu242zTty_HZsNPebR1ib3s7Nekprh07duyfAV6nLnaxtDF3LpdcmrDguXGCR85WOToQThmqdx5P1HBPftlP9pfgz7wWhtIq5zrRK2rblBQjXxWRIqR2tO8fj35z6hpFt6vzFhpF11rBrnmIsa6wY7s6O0UXbrY2-oz8fiPE1ubupyHvugzwUoXxMa9ErqzMjVAiMxmhpaCDlqHjgJbS2bhU0tnSJblRxjiH1tfJStBtnMrTSpkyxv-9AcuSAigDWN7YnHz9trjHSLNEdHepUaZWZ2gNKEUpyrmSoeSiZw1904B_TcMF23g5b_PS5a23iVt34U53mGXrrfTdg6Wqvg-320ggawucHsB07Iu8ZmxUs7HvGcQOLiRasjajhOGvtiKsjeKztkATp7IzUkgf2GFzyglK4lfFPGwEoxAya3xiN0UYWDNlTdvm4CHsXQsPHsGgburqCTA8v2SRcpkg3KAiLYrQUKZsnKvMWamSAML5F9dlB4NO3TgOtXeHMqVbJmlkkiYmaRHAu8UrRy0GyFWTN4iNi4kE3-0fNNMfutMGOnciLGWOuyENpbWykCYqbZxEuG4VxzaAtyQEmpQMLq4suloJJJHguvR6QkBlKFtpACu9magcyv7wXIx0p5xm-nwrBfBqMUxvUsJdXTUnNAcVdyLxPBnA41bqFiR5pzWOogDSnjz2aO6P1Ac_PXQ5EocnwjiA93PJPV_Wfz_p06uJeAk3h7vjHb0zmmw_g1uCdlcY8UiuwOB4elI9x1PjsXnRbU0G369bG_wF7Px8nw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3daxQxEA9SoQhStH5trRpBENTQ3SSb3TyeH0erXvHBg76FzWajhbpb7q6I_70zye7arR_g23GZQLKZmcxkZn5DyLPCCy-kE8x7LZm0acW09Zxl3jUaHAivLNY7L47V4VK-P8lP-j6n6yHbfQhJxpoGRGlqNwfnzkcRL9XBGrQqpvpkmimZSgY6-LqEqxpzupZ8NoYRijLnfSjzj9Mml1HA7P9dM1-6mq6mTV6JnYYraX6L7PS2JJ3Fw79NrjXtLtle9NHyXXIzvsnRWGp0h6wWodxqTY9augjde-jppZRHGnM7KPyKtVnxPZ3GUkkgpT9QNbyiZ913hqAO3xoaABwoPubSLqRYo69PuxXtYsOBu2Q5f_f5zSHrey6wWqViwxqulZPacsVLWyJ2DLirJbhRYDd4J2olvat9rq2y1nuwRbxsOMYmlS4aZWtxj2y1Xds8IBQsiTJTvuSI4FMVVZVazFkVWpXeSZUnJB0-vql7QHLsi3FmgmNSKhPPy8B5GTwvwxPyYpxyHtE4_kX8Gk90JEQg7fBHt_pierk02vO0lhr4skilc7KSNqudyDNYtxLCJeQ58oNBcYfF1VVftQBbROAsM8sRMgzYrEjI_oQSxLSeDg8cZXo1sTY8U9h-AIzWhDwdh3Empr61TXeBNKBCcwmWXULuRwYctxTcR5FlCSkmrDnZ83SkPf0aQMRhc2CbiYS8HJj417L--kn3_ov6Cdn-9HZuPh4df3hIbnAUuzRjmdwnW5vVRfMIrLmNfRwk9iecxEFc |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mothers+In+Motion+intervention+effect+on+psychosocial+health+in+young%2C+low-income+women+with+overweight+or+obesity&rft.jtitle=BMC+public+health&rft.au=Chang%2C+Mei-Wei&rft.au=Nitzke%2C+Susan&rft.au=Brown%2C+Roger&rft.date=2019-01-14&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12889-019-6404-2&rft.externalDocID=A581408527 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2458&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2458&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2458&client=summon |