Recommendations for cerebrospinal fluid collection for the analysis by ELISA of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and total tau in combination with Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40)

Background The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAlzheimer's research & therapy Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. 40 - 10
Main Authors Vanderstichele, Hugo, Demeyer, Leentje, Janelidze, Shorena, Coart, Els, Stoops, Erik, Mauroo, Kimberley, Herbst, Victor, François, Cindy, Hansson, Oskar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 06.06.2017
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1758-9193
1758-9193
DOI10.1186/s13195-017-0265-7

Cover

Abstract Background The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is clear that the field of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) will benefit from an integration of algorithms including CSF concentrations of individual proteins, especially as an aid in clinical decision-making or to improve patient enrolment in clinical trials. The protein profiling approach requires standard operating procedures for collection and storage of CSF which must be easy to integrate into a routine clinical lab environment. Our study provides recommendations for analysis of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau, in combination with the ratio of β-amyloid Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40). Methods Protocols for CSF collection were compared with CSF derived from subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus ( n  = 19). Variables included recipient type (collection, storage), tube volume, and addition of detergents at the time of collection. CSF biomarker analysis was performed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models. Results Adsorption to recipients is lower for neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau (<10%), as compared to Aβ(1–42). For neurogranin trunc P75 and total tau, there is still an effect on analyte concentrations as a function of the tube volume. Protocol-related differences for Aβ(1–42) can be normalized at the (pre-)analytical level using the ratio Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40), but not by using the ratio Aβ(1–42)/tau. The addition of detergent at the time of collection eliminates differences due to adsorption. Conclusions Our study recommends the use of low protein binding tubes for quantification in CSF (without additives) of all relevant CSF biomarkers. Pre-analytical factors have less effect on α-synuclein, neurogranin trunc P75, and total tau, as compared to Aβ(1–42). The ratio of Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40), but not Aβ(1–42)/tau, can be used to adjust for pre-analytical differences in analyte concentrations. Our study does not recommend the inclusion of detergents at the time of collection of CSF. The present results provide an experimental basis for new recommendations for parallel analysis of several proteins using one protocol for collection and storage of CSF.
AbstractList Background The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is clear that the field of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) will benefit from an integration of algorithms including CSF concentrations of individual proteins, especially as an aid in clinical decision-making or to improve patient enrolment in clinical trials. The protein profiling approach requires standard operating procedures for collection and storage of CSF which must be easy to integrate into a routine clinical lab environment. Our study provides recommendations for analysis of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau, in combination with the ratio of β-amyloid Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40). Methods Protocols for CSF collection were compared with CSF derived from subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus ( n  = 19). Variables included recipient type (collection, storage), tube volume, and addition of detergents at the time of collection. CSF biomarker analysis was performed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models. Results Adsorption to recipients is lower for neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau (<10%), as compared to Aβ(1–42). For neurogranin trunc P75 and total tau, there is still an effect on analyte concentrations as a function of the tube volume. Protocol-related differences for Aβ(1–42) can be normalized at the (pre-)analytical level using the ratio Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40), but not by using the ratio Aβ(1–42)/tau. The addition of detergent at the time of collection eliminates differences due to adsorption. Conclusions Our study recommends the use of low protein binding tubes for quantification in CSF (without additives) of all relevant CSF biomarkers. Pre-analytical factors have less effect on α-synuclein, neurogranin trunc P75, and total tau, as compared to Aβ(1–42). The ratio of Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40), but not Aβ(1–42)/tau, can be used to adjust for pre-analytical differences in analyte concentrations. Our study does not recommend the inclusion of detergents at the time of collection of CSF. The present results provide an experimental basis for new recommendations for parallel analysis of several proteins using one protocol for collection and storage of CSF.
The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is clear that the field of Alzheimer's disease (AD) will benefit from an integration of algorithms including CSF concentrations of individual proteins, especially as an aid in clinical decision-making or to improve patient enrolment in clinical trials. The protein profiling approach requires standard operating procedures for collection and storage of CSF which must be easy to integrate into a routine clinical lab environment. Our study provides recommendations for analysis of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau, in combination with the ratio of β-amyloid Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40). Protocols for CSF collection were compared with CSF derived from subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus (n = 19). Variables included recipient type (collection, storage), tube volume, and addition of detergents at the time of collection. CSF biomarker analysis was performed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models. Adsorption to recipients is lower for neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau (<10%), as compared to Aβ(1-42). For neurogranin trunc P75 and total tau, there is still an effect on analyte concentrations as a function of the tube volume. Protocol-related differences for Aβ(1-42) can be normalized at the (pre-)analytical level using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not by using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/tau. The addition of detergent at the time of collection eliminates differences due to adsorption. Our study recommends the use of low protein binding tubes for quantification in CSF (without additives) of all relevant CSF biomarkers. Pre-analytical factors have less effect on α-synuclein, neurogranin trunc P75, and total tau, as compared to Aβ(1-42). The ratio of Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not Aβ(1-42)/tau, can be used to adjust for pre-analytical differences in analyte concentrations. Our study does not recommend the inclusion of detergents at the time of collection of CSF. The present results provide an experimental basis for new recommendations for parallel analysis of several proteins using one protocol for collection and storage of CSF.
The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is clear that the field of Alzheimer's disease (AD) will benefit from an integration of algorithms including CSF concentrations of individual proteins, especially as an aid in clinical decision-making or to improve patient enrolment in clinical trials. The protein profiling approach requires standard operating procedures for collection and storage of CSF which must be easy to integrate into a routine clinical lab environment. Our study provides recommendations for analysis of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau, in combination with the ratio of β-amyloid Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40).BACKGROUNDThe pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is clear that the field of Alzheimer's disease (AD) will benefit from an integration of algorithms including CSF concentrations of individual proteins, especially as an aid in clinical decision-making or to improve patient enrolment in clinical trials. The protein profiling approach requires standard operating procedures for collection and storage of CSF which must be easy to integrate into a routine clinical lab environment. Our study provides recommendations for analysis of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau, in combination with the ratio of β-amyloid Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40).Protocols for CSF collection were compared with CSF derived from subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus (n = 19). Variables included recipient type (collection, storage), tube volume, and addition of detergents at the time of collection. CSF biomarker analysis was performed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models.METHODSProtocols for CSF collection were compared with CSF derived from subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus (n = 19). Variables included recipient type (collection, storage), tube volume, and addition of detergents at the time of collection. CSF biomarker analysis was performed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models.Adsorption to recipients is lower for neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau (<10%), as compared to Aβ(1-42). For neurogranin trunc P75 and total tau, there is still an effect on analyte concentrations as a function of the tube volume. Protocol-related differences for Aβ(1-42) can be normalized at the (pre-)analytical level using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not by using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/tau. The addition of detergent at the time of collection eliminates differences due to adsorption.RESULTSAdsorption to recipients is lower for neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau (<10%), as compared to Aβ(1-42). For neurogranin trunc P75 and total tau, there is still an effect on analyte concentrations as a function of the tube volume. Protocol-related differences for Aβ(1-42) can be normalized at the (pre-)analytical level using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not by using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/tau. The addition of detergent at the time of collection eliminates differences due to adsorption.Our study recommends the use of low protein binding tubes for quantification in CSF (without additives) of all relevant CSF biomarkers. Pre-analytical factors have less effect on α-synuclein, neurogranin trunc P75, and total tau, as compared to Aβ(1-42). The ratio of Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not Aβ(1-42)/tau, can be used to adjust for pre-analytical differences in analyte concentrations. Our study does not recommend the inclusion of detergents at the time of collection of CSF. The present results provide an experimental basis for new recommendations for parallel analysis of several proteins using one protocol for collection and storage of CSF.CONCLUSIONSOur study recommends the use of low protein binding tubes for quantification in CSF (without additives) of all relevant CSF biomarkers. Pre-analytical factors have less effect on α-synuclein, neurogranin trunc P75, and total tau, as compared to Aβ(1-42). The ratio of Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not Aβ(1-42)/tau, can be used to adjust for pre-analytical differences in analyte concentrations. Our study does not recommend the inclusion of detergents at the time of collection of CSF. The present results provide an experimental basis for new recommendations for parallel analysis of several proteins using one protocol for collection and storage of CSF.
Background: The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is clear that the field of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) will benefit from an integration of algorithms including CSF concentrations of individual proteins, especially as an aid in clinical decision-making or to improve patient enrolment in clinical trials. The protein profiling approach requires standard operating procedures for collection and storage of CSF which must be easy to integrate into a routine clinical lab environment. Our study provides recommendations for analysis of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau, in combination with the ratio of β-amyloid Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40). Methods: Protocols for CSF collection were compared with CSF derived from subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus (n = 19). Variablesincluded recipient type (collection, storage), tube volume, and addition of detergents at the time of collection. CSF biomarker analysis was performed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models. Results: Adsorption to recipients is lower for neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau (<10%), as compared to Aβ(1-42). For neurogranin trunc P75 and total tau, there is still an effect on analyte concentrations as a function of the tube volume. Protocol-related differences for Aβ(1-42) can be normalized at the (pre-)analytical level using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not by using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/tau. The addition of detergent at the time of collection eliminates differences due to adsorption. Conclusions: Our study recommends the use of low protein binding tubes for quantification in CSF (without additives) of all relevant CSF biomarkers. Pre-analytical factors have less effect on α-synuclein, neurogranin trunc P75, and totaltau, as compared to Aβ(1-42). The ratio of Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not Aβ(1-42)/tau, can be used to adjust for pre-analytical differences in analyte concentrations. Our study does not recommend the inclusion of detergents at the time of collection of CSF. The present results provide an experimental basis for new recommendations for parallel analysis of several proteins using one protocol for collection and storage of CSF.
Abstract Background The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is clear that the field of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) will benefit from an integration of algorithms including CSF concentrations of individual proteins, especially as an aid in clinical decision-making or to improve patient enrolment in clinical trials. The protein profiling approach requires standard operating procedures for collection and storage of CSF which must be easy to integrate into a routine clinical lab environment. Our study provides recommendations for analysis of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau, in combination with the ratio of β-amyloid Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40). Methods Protocols for CSF collection were compared with CSF derived from subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus (n = 19). Variables included recipient type (collection, storage), tube volume, and addition of detergents at the time of collection. CSF biomarker analysis was performed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models. Results Adsorption to recipients is lower for neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau (<10%), as compared to Aβ(1–42). For neurogranin trunc P75 and total tau, there is still an effect on analyte concentrations as a function of the tube volume. Protocol-related differences for Aβ(1–42) can be normalized at the (pre-)analytical level using the ratio Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40), but not by using the ratio Aβ(1–42)/tau. The addition of detergent at the time of collection eliminates differences due to adsorption. Conclusions Our study recommends the use of low protein binding tubes for quantification in CSF (without additives) of all relevant CSF biomarkers. Pre-analytical factors have less effect on α-synuclein, neurogranin trunc P75, and total tau, as compared to Aβ(1–42). The ratio of Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40), but not Aβ(1–42)/tau, can be used to adjust for pre-analytical differences in analyte concentrations. Our study does not recommend the inclusion of detergents at the time of collection of CSF. The present results provide an experimental basis for new recommendations for parallel analysis of several proteins using one protocol for collection and storage of CSF.
ArticleNumber 40
Author Janelidze, Shorena
Stoops, Erik
Mauroo, Kimberley
Vanderstichele, Hugo
François, Cindy
Herbst, Victor
Demeyer, Leentje
Coart, Els
Hansson, Oskar
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Hugo
  surname: Vanderstichele
  fullname: Vanderstichele, Hugo
  email: Hugo.vanderstichele@adxneurosciences.com
  organization: ADx NeuroSciences
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Leentje
  surname: Demeyer
  fullname: Demeyer, Leentje
  organization: ADx NeuroSciences
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Shorena
  surname: Janelidze
  fullname: Janelidze, Shorena
  organization: Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Els
  surname: Coart
  fullname: Coart, Els
  organization: IDDI
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Erik
  surname: Stoops
  fullname: Stoops, Erik
  organization: ADx NeuroSciences
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Kimberley
  surname: Mauroo
  fullname: Mauroo, Kimberley
  organization: ADx NeuroSciences
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Victor
  surname: Herbst
  fullname: Herbst, Victor
  organization: Euroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Cindy
  surname: François
  fullname: François, Cindy
  organization: ADx NeuroSciences
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Oskar
  surname: Hansson
  fullname: Hansson, Oskar
  organization: Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28587660$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kstu1DAYhSNURC_wAGyQl63UUDuJL9kgjaoCI40E4rK2HOf3jKuMPdgJ1ex4B94DCR6kD8GT4JlMqw6LbhwrPuc7vpzj7MB5B1n2kuDXhAh2EUlJappjwnNcMJrzJ9kR4VTkNanLgwfzw-w4xmuMGStE9Sw7LAQVnDF8lP36BNovl-Ba1VvvIjI-IA0BmuDjyjrVIdMNtkXadx3ojWYr6ReAVFpdRxtRs0ZXs-nnCfIGORiCnwflrEN9GJxGHzk9R7e_87h2g-7AuvPkbFHv-wTv1YCSMu2hSWFb_I3tF2hy--eU_P3xsyrOLu7n-Ox59tSoLsKL3fck-_r26svl-3z24d30cjLLNa1FnyvdKFKw0hjasoqDwarkLS0Ub6DAJW1U0TDGRdlooRuucQ0UCtYS1XJDhSlPsunIbb26lqtglyqspVdWbn_4MJcq9DYdR7JasLLAjJe0qlrFVMNKnLi0qHUpGEssNbLiDayGZo-28iHdggwQQQW9kN0gI8ik6qweH0S22nDKQEgKzMhKK5C10iYNVAtc6ZYRnjLejBnJuoRWg-tD4u5F7a04u5Bz_13SKtmrDeB0Bwj-2wCxl0sbNXSdcuCHKEmNOcakEiJJXz3Mug-5K1US8FGgU4diACO17benSdG2kwTLTX3lWF-Z6is39ZWbXZD_nHfwxzzF7nqT1s0hyGs_hFTN-IjpH5hNCVs
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_talanta_2023_125229
crossref_primary_10_1515_cclm_2018_0147
crossref_primary_10_1002_wnan_1993
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_plabm_2024_e00425
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12031_019_1261_0
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12951_021_00852_1
crossref_primary_10_1002_trc2_12098
crossref_primary_10_3233_JPD_223285
crossref_primary_10_1093_labmed_lmaa062
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci12101414
crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_180563
crossref_primary_10_1021_acsmeasuresciau_3c00028
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13195_019_0517_9
crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_190069
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cca_2019_07_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jalz_2018_05_008
Cites_doi 10.1002/acn3.274
10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1867
10.1111/jnc.13838
10.1515/cclm-2015-0733
10.1038/nrneurol.2010.4
10.3233/JAD-150883
10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990301)20:3<431::AID-ELPS431>3.0.CO;2-2
10.3233/JAD-160722
10.3233/JAD-150953
10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70299-6
10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0
10.3233/JAD-150511
10.1016/j.jim.2015.08.003
10.3233/JAD-160227
10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1285
10.1212/01.wnl.0000260698.46517.8f
10.1186/s13195-015-0124-3
10.1038/nrneurol.2013.10
10.1159/000112832
10.1016/j.jalz.2011.07.004
10.3233/JAD-160286
10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
10.1056/NEJMp1208061
10.1016/j.jalz.2015.09.009
10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.05.003
10.2217/bmm.12.46
10.1016/j.cca.2016.05.014
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s). 2017
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s). 2017
CorporateAuthor MultiPark: Multidisciplinary research focused on Parkinson's disease
Lunds universitet
Profile areas and other strong research environments
Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö
Lund University
Strategiska forskningsområden (SFO)
Faculty of Medicine
Strategic research areas (SRA)
Clinical Memory Research
Klinisk minnesforskning
Medicinska fakulteten
Profilområden och andra starka forskningsmiljöer
Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Malmö
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: Faculty of Medicine
– name: Medicinska fakulteten
– name: Strategiska forskningsområden (SFO)
– name: Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Malmö
– name: Clinical Memory Research
– name: Strategic research areas (SRA)
– name: Lunds universitet
– name: Klinisk minnesforskning
– name: Profilområden och andra starka forskningsmiljöer
– name: Lund University
– name: Profile areas and other strong research environments
– name: MultiPark: Multidisciplinary research focused on Parkinson's disease
– name: Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ADTPV
AGCHP
AOWAS
D8T
D95
ZZAVC
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s13195-017-0265-7
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
SwePub
SWEPUB Lunds universitet full text
SwePub Articles
SWEPUB Freely available online
SWEPUB Lunds universitet
SwePub Articles full text
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1758-9193
EndPage 10
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_6986320673544da6ab630bc8529c3866
oai_portal_research_lu_se_publications_dcf756e8_5e6f_4cae_9acf_9a5c804cd617
PMC5461747
28587660
10_1186_s13195_017_0265_7
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23M
2WC
53G
5VS
6J9
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACJQM
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADUKV
AEAQA
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIAM
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
H13
HMCUK
HYE
HZ~
IAO
IEA
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M~E
O5R
O5S
O9-
OK1
P2P
P6G
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
AAYXX
ALIPV
CITATION
-56
-5G
-BR
3V.
ACRMQ
ADINQ
C24
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ADTPV
AGCHP
AOWAS
D8T
D95
ZZAVC
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-acba1263ff5d647ef0a37d52a7be2035ba2b66783bc8cb7c09e5e26d1ad7f58f3
IEDL.DBID C6C
ISSN 1758-9193
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:31:01 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 10 00:16:15 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:03:28 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 17:03:37 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 23:10:16 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:10:05 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:38:47 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:34:47 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Recommendations
CSF
Standardization
Neurogranin
Collection
Tau
Amyloid
Synuclein
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c598t-acba1263ff5d647ef0a37d52a7be2035ba2b66783bc8cb7c09e5e26d1ad7f58f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0265-7
PMID 28587660
PQID 1907001488
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6986320673544da6ab630bc8529c3866
swepub_primary_oai_portal_research_lu_se_publications_dcf756e8_5e6f_4cae_9acf_9a5c804cd617
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5461747
proquest_miscellaneous_1907001488
pubmed_primary_28587660
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13195_017_0265_7
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13195_017_0265_7
springer_journals_10_1186_s13195_017_0265_7
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-06-06
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-06-06
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-06-06
  day: 06
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle Alzheimer's research & therapy
PublicationTitleAbbrev Alz Res Therapy
PublicationTitleAlternate Alzheimers Res Ther
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References MI Kester (265_CR26) 2015; 72
H Kvartsberg (265_CR27) 2015; 7
265_CR10
E Niemantsverdriet (265_CR19) 2016; 51
European Medicines Agency (265_CR6) 2011
B Dubois (265_CR4) 2014; 13
H Vanderstichele (265_CR8) 2012; 8
S Janelidze (265_CR12) 2016; 3
HMJ Vanderstichele (265_CR15) 2016; 53
A Vos De (265_CR25) 2016; 53
P Davidsson (265_CR24) 1999; 20
N Kruse (265_CR21) 2015; 36
R Barbour (265_CR29) 2008; 5
J Pannee (265_CR14) 2016; 139
CL Sutphen (265_CR16) 2015; 72
K Blennow (265_CR2) 2010; 6
T Bittner (265_CR11) 2016; 12
N Lelental (265_CR18) 2016; 52
LG Barrado (265_CR20) 2016; 49
SW Scheff (265_CR23) 2007; 68
CR Jack Jr (265_CR1) 2010; 9
L Parnetti (265_CR28) 2013; 9
M Campo del (265_CR9) 2012; 6
L Yang (265_CR5) 2012; 367
265_CR7
P Lewczuk (265_CR13) 2016; 55
GM McKhann (265_CR3) 2011; 7
M Bjerke (265_CR17) 2016; 54
N Kruse (265_CR22) 2015; 426
22047631 - Alzheimers Dement. 2012 Jan;8(1):65-73
23419373 - Nat Rev Neurol. 2013 Mar;9(3):131-40
27042676 - Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016 Jan 01;3(3):154-65
27792012 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Nov 19;55(2):813-822
20083042 - Lancet Neurol. 2010 Jan;9(1):119-28
17470753 - Neurology. 2007 May 1;68(18):1501-8
26366630 - JAMA Neurol. 2015 Nov;72 (11):1275-80
26967210 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Mar 1;52(1):51-64
21514250 - Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9
26495928 - Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Jul 1;54(7):1177-91
26484919 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2015 ;49(1):187-99
22931256 - N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 6;367 (10 ):885-7
26271436 - J Immunol Methods. 2015 Nov;426:70-5
26147946 - JAMA Neurol. 2015 Sep;72 (9):1029-42
27579672 - J Neurochem. 2016 Nov;139(4):651-658
24849862 - Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jun;13(6):614-29
22917144 - Biomark Med. 2012 Aug;6(4):419-30
10217148 - Electrophoresis. 1999 Mar;20(3):431-7
18182779 - Neurodegener Dis. 2008;5(2):55-9
27216941 - Clin Chim Acta. 2017 Apr;467:27-33
26136856 - Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015 Jul 01;7(1):40
26555316 - Alzheimers Dement. 2016 May;12(5):517-26
26093515 - Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Sep;36(9):2587-96
27392859 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Jul 6;53(4):1523-38
20157306 - Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Mar;6(3):131-44
26836187 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51(1):97-106
27258423 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 May 31;53(3):1121-32
References_xml – volume: 3
  start-page: 154
  year: 2016
  ident: 265_CR12
  publication-title: Ann Clin Transl Neurol
  doi: 10.1002/acn3.274
– volume: 72
  start-page: 1275
  year: 2015
  ident: 265_CR26
  publication-title: JAMA Neurol
  doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1867
– volume: 139
  start-page: 651
  year: 2016
  ident: 265_CR14
  publication-title: J Neurochem
  doi: 10.1111/jnc.13838
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1177
  year: 2016
  ident: 265_CR17
  publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med
  doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0733
– volume: 6
  start-page: 131
  year: 2010
  ident: 265_CR2
  publication-title: Nat Rev Neurol
  doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.4
– volume: 52
  start-page: 51
  year: 2016
  ident: 265_CR18
  publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis
  doi: 10.3233/JAD-150883
– volume: 20
  start-page: 431
  year: 1999
  ident: 265_CR24
  publication-title: Electrophoresis
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990301)20:3<431::AID-ELPS431>3.0.CO;2-2
– volume: 55
  start-page: 813
  year: 2016
  ident: 265_CR13
  publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis
  doi: 10.3233/JAD-160722
– volume: 51
  start-page: 97
  year: 2016
  ident: 265_CR19
  publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis
  doi: 10.3233/JAD-150953
– volume: 9
  start-page: 119
  year: 2010
  ident: 265_CR1
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70299-6
– volume: 13
  start-page: 614
  year: 2014
  ident: 265_CR4
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0
– volume: 49
  start-page: 187
  year: 2016
  ident: 265_CR20
  publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis
  doi: 10.3233/JAD-150511
– volume: 426
  start-page: 70
  year: 2015
  ident: 265_CR22
  publication-title: J Immunol Methods
  doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2015.08.003
– volume: 53
  start-page: 1523
  year: 2016
  ident: 265_CR25
  publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis
  doi: 10.3233/JAD-160227
– volume: 72
  start-page: 1029
  issue: 9
  year: 2015
  ident: 265_CR16
  publication-title: JAMA Neurol
  doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1285
– volume: 68
  start-page: 1501
  year: 2007
  ident: 265_CR23
  publication-title: Neurology
  doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000260698.46517.8f
– volume: 7
  start-page: 40
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 265_CR27
  publication-title: Alzheimers Res Ther
  doi: 10.1186/s13195-015-0124-3
– volume-title: Qualification opinion of Alzheimer’s disease novel methodologies/biomarkers for BMS-708163
  year: 2011
  ident: 265_CR6
– volume: 9
  start-page: 131
  year: 2013
  ident: 265_CR28
  publication-title: Nat Rev Neurol
  doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.10
– volume: 5
  start-page: 55
  year: 2008
  ident: 265_CR29
  publication-title: Neurodegener Dis
  doi: 10.1159/000112832
– volume: 8
  start-page: 65
  year: 2012
  ident: 265_CR8
  publication-title: Alzheimers Dement
  doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.07.004
– volume: 53
  start-page: 1121
  year: 2016
  ident: 265_CR15
  publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis
  doi: 10.3233/JAD-160286
– volume: 7
  start-page: 263
  year: 2011
  ident: 265_CR3
  publication-title: Alzheimers Dement
  doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
– volume: 367
  start-page: 885
  year: 2012
  ident: 265_CR5
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1208061
– ident: 265_CR7
– volume: 12
  start-page: 517
  year: 2016
  ident: 265_CR11
  publication-title: Alzheimers Dement
  doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.09.009
– volume: 36
  start-page: 2587
  year: 2015
  ident: 265_CR21
  publication-title: Neurobiol Aging
  doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.05.003
– volume: 6
  start-page: 419
  year: 2012
  ident: 265_CR9
  publication-title: Biomark Med
  doi: 10.2217/bmm.12.46
– ident: 265_CR10
  doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.05.014
– reference: 27579672 - J Neurochem. 2016 Nov;139(4):651-658
– reference: 26967210 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Mar 1;52(1):51-64
– reference: 24849862 - Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jun;13(6):614-29
– reference: 27042676 - Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016 Jan 01;3(3):154-65
– reference: 20083042 - Lancet Neurol. 2010 Jan;9(1):119-28
– reference: 26271436 - J Immunol Methods. 2015 Nov;426:70-5
– reference: 22047631 - Alzheimers Dement. 2012 Jan;8(1):65-73
– reference: 27216941 - Clin Chim Acta. 2017 Apr;467:27-33
– reference: 26495928 - Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Jul 1;54(7):1177-91
– reference: 17470753 - Neurology. 2007 May 1;68(18):1501-8
– reference: 26484919 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2015 ;49(1):187-99
– reference: 27392859 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Jul 6;53(4):1523-38
– reference: 23419373 - Nat Rev Neurol. 2013 Mar;9(3):131-40
– reference: 27792012 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Nov 19;55(2):813-822
– reference: 26136856 - Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015 Jul 01;7(1):40
– reference: 27258423 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 May 31;53(3):1121-32
– reference: 18182779 - Neurodegener Dis. 2008;5(2):55-9
– reference: 21514250 - Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9
– reference: 26555316 - Alzheimers Dement. 2016 May;12(5):517-26
– reference: 22917144 - Biomark Med. 2012 Aug;6(4):419-30
– reference: 26093515 - Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Sep;36(9):2587-96
– reference: 22931256 - N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 6;367 (10 ):885-7
– reference: 26366630 - JAMA Neurol. 2015 Nov;72 (11):1275-80
– reference: 26836187 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51(1):97-106
– reference: 20157306 - Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Mar;6(3):131-44
– reference: 10217148 - Electrophoresis. 1999 Mar;20(3):431-7
– reference: 26147946 - JAMA Neurol. 2015 Sep;72 (9):1029-42
SSID ssj0066284
Score 2.2066495
Snippet Background The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in...
The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of...
Background: The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in...
Abstract Background The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several...
SourceID doaj
swepub
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 40
SubjectTerms alpha-Synuclein - cerebrospinal fluid
Amyloid beta-Peptides - cerebrospinal fluid
Belgium
Biomarkers - cerebrospinal fluid
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Cerebrospinal Fluid - metabolism
Collection
CSF
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - standards
Female
Geriatric Psychiatry
Geriatrics/Gerontology
Humans
Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - cerebrospinal fluid
Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - diagnosis
Male
Middle Aged
Neurogranin
Neurogranin - cerebrospinal fluid
Neurology
Neurosciences
Peptide Fragments - cerebrospinal fluid
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Specimen Handling - instrumentation
Specimen Handling - methods
Specimen Handling - standards
Standardization
Synuclein
Tau
tau Proteins - cerebrospinal fluid
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwELZQT1wQiL-FgozEgUKjTWJ77BwX1KoghJCgUsXF8i9daZutmt1Db7wD74EED9KH4EkYO9lVF1C5IEVRlNjJJDOe-Sa2viHkKQdwzJexEMrUBZdpSAmwhWyk8UpIy2JeIPsODg75myNxdKnUV1oT1tMD9x9uDI0CljjGmeDcGzAWWGmdEnXjmIJMto1hbJVM9T4YAL3uMIdZKRh3FUs1CZNHxpxDFHIjCmWy_r8hzD8XSq5nS39jFs3RaP8muTHASDrpxb9FroX2NvmWcsmTkzDUSeooAlLqwhmmvak6SOoQZ8upp0n5eQlWm5sgBqRmICeh9pzuvX39YULnkWayy88YzaYtXZxhBKTvpdilF9-L7rxNRMjTdhd7erqYI4anC7Ok2BJlwHQ7i0DTb146ufjxrPr55Suvd8br43LnDjnc3_v46qAY6jEUTjRqURhnTVUDi1F44DLE0jDpRW2kDXXJhDW1BQx-DNXjrHRlE0SowVfGyyhUZHfJVjtvw31CA6alFiI3sfG8imAavLGKxsbGMIR9I1Ku9KPdQFaeambMdE5aFOhepRpVqpNKtRyR5-supz1Tx1WNXyalrxsmku18Ak1PD6an_2V6I_JkZTIaB2WaaTFtmC87jSgrzeejcxyRe70JrR9VK4ERCMoRkRvGtSHL5pV2epyJvwVHvMlR-BcrM9SDx-muetVPvaVuPiAnd3pglDrWs6Xugj699KtYexelgKC0CBA1dyboxriIO-FUyZ1HYR78j-_4kFyv89AE3LbJFhp0eIRQb2Ef51H9CzbnVMM
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Recommendations for cerebrospinal fluid collection for the analysis by ELISA of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and total tau in combination with Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40)
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13195-017-0265-7
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28587660
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1907001488
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5461747
https://doaj.org/article/6986320673544da6ab630bc8529c3866
Volume 9
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVADU
  databaseName: BioMedCentral
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1758-9193
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0066284
  issn: 1758-9193
  databaseCode: RBZ
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/
  providerName: BioMedCentral
– providerCode: PRVAFT
  databaseName: Open Access Digital Library
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1758-9193
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0066284
  issn: 1758-9193
  databaseCode: KQ8
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html
  providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1758-9193
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0066284
  issn: 1758-9193
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVEBS
  databaseName: Academic Search Ultimate - eBooks
  customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn
  eissn: 1758-9193
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0066284
  issn: 1758-9193
  databaseCode: ABDBF
  dateStart: 20100101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn
  providerName: EBSCOhost
– providerCode: PRVBFR
  databaseName: Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1758-9193
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0066284
  issn: 1758-9193
  databaseCode: DIK
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com
  providerName: Flying Publisher
– providerCode: PRVFQY
  databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1758-9193
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0066284
  issn: 1758-9193
  databaseCode: GX1
  dateStart: 0
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php
  providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1758-9193
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0066284
  issn: 1758-9193
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVAQN
  databaseName: PubMed Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1758-9193
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0066284
  issn: 1758-9193
  databaseCode: RPM
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
  providerName: National Library of Medicine
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1758-9193
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0066284
  issn: 1758-9193
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 20150101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  eissn: 1758-9193
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0066284
  issn: 1758-9193
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20150101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: HAS SpringerNature Open Access 2022
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1758-9193
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0066284
  issn: 1758-9193
  databaseCode: AAJSJ
  dateStart: 20090601
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.springernature.com
  providerName: Springer Nature
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1758-9193
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0066284
  issn: 1758-9193
  databaseCode: C6C
  dateStart: 20090601
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.springeropen.com/
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3NahsxEBZNcumltPTP_TEq9NC0WbJeSSPt0TEOaSkhtA2YXoSklRKDsw5Z-5Bb36HvUWgfJA_RJ-lIXpu4DYGCMWYtrWaZf432G0JecwDHqjxkQpki4zKqlACbyVKaSglpWUgHZA_h4Jh_GIlRCxYd34W5Xr_vKdhteix2E4y2FLMFkckNsiXQ7sbTewMYLI0uAJrZtmh547Q1t5PQ-W8KKf89Gbkqj_4FJZrcz_59cq-NG2l_wegH5I6vH5IfMXk8O_NtY6SGYgRKnb_APDe2A4kTwmQ-rmjkdjpzVachGPRR06KRUHtJhx_ff-7TaaAJ3fIE3de4prMLdHn0SIodevUzay7riHw8rndwZkVnUwza6czMKY5EGjC_TiTQuK9L-1e_3vR-f_vOi-3d1e98-xE53h9-GRxkbQOGzIlSzTLjrOkVwEIQFXDpQ26YrERhpPVFzoQ1hQX0dsw65ax0eemFL6DqmUoGoQJ7TDbrae2fEuoxD7UQuAllxXsBTIk3VsHYUBqGcV6H5Ev-aNeik8cmGROdshQFesFSjSzVkaVadsjb1ZTzBTTHbYP3ItNXAyOqdrqAwqZbJdVQKmARz54JzisDxgLL8dlEUTqmADrk1VJkNGphLK2Y2k_njcawKhbw0Rp2yJOFCK2WKpRAlwN5h8g14VqjZf2fenyakL4FxwCTI_HvlmKoWxPT3PaoXxeSur5AyuZ0CyF1qidz3Xh9fm1vWFcuSAFeaeEhaO6M16VxAb-EUzl3FRLz7L9IeU7uFkkHAT8vyCZKrn-JQdzMdsmGHMku2dobHh596iZl7qYNkT_a-0ni
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3NbtQwELagPcAFgfhbfo3EgUKjZmN77BwX1KpdlgqprVRxsWzHbldqs1Wze-iNd-A9kOBB-hA8CWNvsmKhqoQURVFiJxPNf8b5hpDXHMCxKg-ZUKbIuIwqJcBmspSmUkJaFtIC2V3YPuDDQ3HY_sfddKvdu5JkstRJrRVsNH0W-wpGq4p5g8jkTbKqhAC-QlYHg-HesDPAAGhy2wLmlROXXFBC6r8qvPx3leSiVPoXrGhyRVt3yZ02hqSDOdPvkRu-vk--x0Ty9NS3TZIaitEodf4cc97YGiROCCezcUUj59P6qzoNwQCQmhaZhNoLujna2RvQSaAJ6fIIXdm4ptNzdH_0sxTr9PJH1lzUEQV5XK_jzIpOJxjA06mZURyJNGCunUig8RsvHVz-fNP_9fUbL9Y2Fsf52gNysLW5_2E7a5sxZE6UapoZZ02_ABaCqIBLH3LDZCUKI60vciasKSyg52PWKWely0svfAFV31QyCBXYQ7JST2r_mFCPOamFwE0oK94PYEq8sQrGhtIwjPl6JO_4o12LVB4bZpzolLEo0HOWamSpjizVskfeLqaczWE6rhv8PjJ9MTAibKcTk_Mj3SqshlIBi9j2THBeGTAWWI7vJorSMQXQI686kdGokbHMYmo_mTUaQ6xYzEfL2COP5iK0eFShBLofyHtELgnXEi3LV-rxcUL9FhyDTY7Ev-vEULfmprnuVb_MJXX5ASmz0y2c1LE-menG67M_vhPrygUpwCstPATNnfG6NC7gTjiVc1chMU_-i5SX5Nb2_qeRHu3sfnxKbhdJHwG3Z2QFpdg_x-Bual-0yvwbDbBOzQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3datRAFB60BfFGFP_W3xG8sNrQbGbmzORy1S7tWkqhFoo3w_y2C222NLsXvfMdfA9BH6QP4ZN4JskurpaCEEJIZpITzn_O5DuEvOYAjvk8ZkKZIuMyqZQAm8lSGq-EtCw2C2R3YeuAjw7FYdfntJ6vdp-XJNt_GhJKUzXdOPOxVXEFG3WfpR6DycJiDiEyeZOsKlECZl-rg8FofzQ3xgBofrti5pUTl9xRg9p_Vaj574rJRdn0L4jRxi0N75I7XTxJB60A3CM3QnWffE9J5elp6Bom1RQjU-rCOea_qU1ImhBPZmNPkxQ0a7GqZggGg9R0KCXUXtDNne39AZ1E2qBeHqFbG1d0eo6ukO5JsU4vf2T1RZUQkcfVOs70dDrBYJ5OzYziSKQB8-6GBJq-99LB5c83_V9fv_FibWNxnK89IAfDzc8ftrKuMUPmRKmmmXHW9AtgMQoPXIaYGya9KIy0ociZsKawgF6QWaeclS4vgwgF-L7xMgoV2UOyUk2q8JjQgPmphchNLD3vRzAl3lhFY2NpGMZ_PZLP-aNdh1qemmec6CZ7UaBblmpkqU4s1bJH3i6mnLWQHdcNfp-YvhiY0LabE5PzI90pr4ZSAUs490xw7g0YCyzHdxNF6ZgC6JFXc5HRqJ2p5GKqMJnVGsOtVNhHK9kjj1oRWjyqUAJdEeQ9IpeEa4mW5SvV-LhBABccA0-OxL-bi6HuTE993at-aSV1-QFNlqc7aKljfTLTddBnf3wz1t5FKSAoLQJEzZ0JujQu4k44lXPnkZgn_0XKS3Jr7-NQ72zvfnpKbheNOgJuz8gKCnF4jnHe1L7odPk3Ro1TFw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recommendations+for+cerebrospinal+fluid+collection+for+the+analysis+by+ELISA+of+neurogranin+trunc+P75%2C+%CE%B1-synuclein%2C+and+total+tau+in+combination+with+A%CE%B2%281%E2%80%9342%29%2FA%CE%B2%281%E2%80%9340%29&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer%27s+research+%26+therapy&rft.au=Vanderstichele%2C+Hugo&rft.au=Demeyer%2C+Leentje&rft.au=Janelidze%2C+Shorena&rft.au=Coart%2C+Els&rft.date=2017-06-06&rft.issn=1758-9193&rft.eissn=1758-9193&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13195-017-0265-7&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s13195_017_0265_7
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1758-9193&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1758-9193&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1758-9193&client=summon