Recommendations for cerebrospinal fluid collection for the analysis by ELISA of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and total tau in combination with Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40)
Background The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is...
Saved in:
Published in | Alzheimer's research & therapy Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. 40 - 10 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
06.06.2017
BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1758-9193 1758-9193 |
DOI | 10.1186/s13195-017-0265-7 |
Cover
Abstract | Background
The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is clear that the field of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) will benefit from an integration of algorithms including CSF concentrations of individual proteins, especially as an aid in clinical decision-making or to improve patient enrolment in clinical trials. The protein profiling approach requires standard operating procedures for collection and storage of CSF which must be easy to integrate into a routine clinical lab environment. Our study provides recommendations for analysis of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau, in combination with the ratio of β-amyloid Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40).
Methods
Protocols for CSF collection were compared with CSF derived from subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus (
n
= 19). Variables included recipient type (collection, storage), tube volume, and addition of detergents at the time of collection. CSF biomarker analysis was performed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models.
Results
Adsorption to recipients is lower for neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau (<10%), as compared to Aβ(1–42). For neurogranin trunc P75 and total tau, there is still an effect on analyte concentrations as a function of the tube volume. Protocol-related differences for Aβ(1–42) can be normalized at the (pre-)analytical level using the ratio Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40), but not by using the ratio Aβ(1–42)/tau. The addition of detergent at the time of collection eliminates differences due to adsorption.
Conclusions
Our study recommends the use of low protein binding tubes for quantification in CSF (without additives) of all relevant CSF biomarkers. Pre-analytical factors have less effect on α-synuclein, neurogranin trunc P75, and total tau, as compared to Aβ(1–42). The ratio of Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40), but not Aβ(1–42)/tau, can be used to adjust for pre-analytical differences in analyte concentrations. Our study does not recommend the inclusion of detergents at the time of collection of CSF. The present results provide an experimental basis for new recommendations for parallel analysis of several proteins using one protocol for collection and storage of CSF. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background
The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is clear that the field of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) will benefit from an integration of algorithms including CSF concentrations of individual proteins, especially as an aid in clinical decision-making or to improve patient enrolment in clinical trials. The protein profiling approach requires standard operating procedures for collection and storage of CSF which must be easy to integrate into a routine clinical lab environment. Our study provides recommendations for analysis of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau, in combination with the ratio of β-amyloid Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40).
Methods
Protocols for CSF collection were compared with CSF derived from subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus (
n
= 19). Variables included recipient type (collection, storage), tube volume, and addition of detergents at the time of collection. CSF biomarker analysis was performed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models.
Results
Adsorption to recipients is lower for neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau (<10%), as compared to Aβ(1–42). For neurogranin trunc P75 and total tau, there is still an effect on analyte concentrations as a function of the tube volume. Protocol-related differences for Aβ(1–42) can be normalized at the (pre-)analytical level using the ratio Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40), but not by using the ratio Aβ(1–42)/tau. The addition of detergent at the time of collection eliminates differences due to adsorption.
Conclusions
Our study recommends the use of low protein binding tubes for quantification in CSF (without additives) of all relevant CSF biomarkers. Pre-analytical factors have less effect on α-synuclein, neurogranin trunc P75, and total tau, as compared to Aβ(1–42). The ratio of Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40), but not Aβ(1–42)/tau, can be used to adjust for pre-analytical differences in analyte concentrations. Our study does not recommend the inclusion of detergents at the time of collection of CSF. The present results provide an experimental basis for new recommendations for parallel analysis of several proteins using one protocol for collection and storage of CSF. The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is clear that the field of Alzheimer's disease (AD) will benefit from an integration of algorithms including CSF concentrations of individual proteins, especially as an aid in clinical decision-making or to improve patient enrolment in clinical trials. The protein profiling approach requires standard operating procedures for collection and storage of CSF which must be easy to integrate into a routine clinical lab environment. Our study provides recommendations for analysis of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau, in combination with the ratio of β-amyloid Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40). Protocols for CSF collection were compared with CSF derived from subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus (n = 19). Variables included recipient type (collection, storage), tube volume, and addition of detergents at the time of collection. CSF biomarker analysis was performed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models. Adsorption to recipients is lower for neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau (<10%), as compared to Aβ(1-42). For neurogranin trunc P75 and total tau, there is still an effect on analyte concentrations as a function of the tube volume. Protocol-related differences for Aβ(1-42) can be normalized at the (pre-)analytical level using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not by using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/tau. The addition of detergent at the time of collection eliminates differences due to adsorption. Our study recommends the use of low protein binding tubes for quantification in CSF (without additives) of all relevant CSF biomarkers. Pre-analytical factors have less effect on α-synuclein, neurogranin trunc P75, and total tau, as compared to Aβ(1-42). The ratio of Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not Aβ(1-42)/tau, can be used to adjust for pre-analytical differences in analyte concentrations. Our study does not recommend the inclusion of detergents at the time of collection of CSF. The present results provide an experimental basis for new recommendations for parallel analysis of several proteins using one protocol for collection and storage of CSF. The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is clear that the field of Alzheimer's disease (AD) will benefit from an integration of algorithms including CSF concentrations of individual proteins, especially as an aid in clinical decision-making or to improve patient enrolment in clinical trials. The protein profiling approach requires standard operating procedures for collection and storage of CSF which must be easy to integrate into a routine clinical lab environment. Our study provides recommendations for analysis of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau, in combination with the ratio of β-amyloid Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40).BACKGROUNDThe pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is clear that the field of Alzheimer's disease (AD) will benefit from an integration of algorithms including CSF concentrations of individual proteins, especially as an aid in clinical decision-making or to improve patient enrolment in clinical trials. The protein profiling approach requires standard operating procedures for collection and storage of CSF which must be easy to integrate into a routine clinical lab environment. Our study provides recommendations for analysis of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau, in combination with the ratio of β-amyloid Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40).Protocols for CSF collection were compared with CSF derived from subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus (n = 19). Variables included recipient type (collection, storage), tube volume, and addition of detergents at the time of collection. CSF biomarker analysis was performed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models.METHODSProtocols for CSF collection were compared with CSF derived from subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus (n = 19). Variables included recipient type (collection, storage), tube volume, and addition of detergents at the time of collection. CSF biomarker analysis was performed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models.Adsorption to recipients is lower for neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau (<10%), as compared to Aβ(1-42). For neurogranin trunc P75 and total tau, there is still an effect on analyte concentrations as a function of the tube volume. Protocol-related differences for Aβ(1-42) can be normalized at the (pre-)analytical level using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not by using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/tau. The addition of detergent at the time of collection eliminates differences due to adsorption.RESULTSAdsorption to recipients is lower for neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau (<10%), as compared to Aβ(1-42). For neurogranin trunc P75 and total tau, there is still an effect on analyte concentrations as a function of the tube volume. Protocol-related differences for Aβ(1-42) can be normalized at the (pre-)analytical level using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not by using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/tau. The addition of detergent at the time of collection eliminates differences due to adsorption.Our study recommends the use of low protein binding tubes for quantification in CSF (without additives) of all relevant CSF biomarkers. Pre-analytical factors have less effect on α-synuclein, neurogranin trunc P75, and total tau, as compared to Aβ(1-42). The ratio of Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not Aβ(1-42)/tau, can be used to adjust for pre-analytical differences in analyte concentrations. Our study does not recommend the inclusion of detergents at the time of collection of CSF. The present results provide an experimental basis for new recommendations for parallel analysis of several proteins using one protocol for collection and storage of CSF.CONCLUSIONSOur study recommends the use of low protein binding tubes for quantification in CSF (without additives) of all relevant CSF biomarkers. Pre-analytical factors have less effect on α-synuclein, neurogranin trunc P75, and total tau, as compared to Aβ(1-42). The ratio of Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not Aβ(1-42)/tau, can be used to adjust for pre-analytical differences in analyte concentrations. Our study does not recommend the inclusion of detergents at the time of collection of CSF. The present results provide an experimental basis for new recommendations for parallel analysis of several proteins using one protocol for collection and storage of CSF. Background: The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is clear that the field of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) will benefit from an integration of algorithms including CSF concentrations of individual proteins, especially as an aid in clinical decision-making or to improve patient enrolment in clinical trials. The protein profiling approach requires standard operating procedures for collection and storage of CSF which must be easy to integrate into a routine clinical lab environment. Our study provides recommendations for analysis of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau, in combination with the ratio of β-amyloid Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40). Methods: Protocols for CSF collection were compared with CSF derived from subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus (n = 19). Variablesincluded recipient type (collection, storage), tube volume, and addition of detergents at the time of collection. CSF biomarker analysis was performed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models. Results: Adsorption to recipients is lower for neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau (<10%), as compared to Aβ(1-42). For neurogranin trunc P75 and total tau, there is still an effect on analyte concentrations as a function of the tube volume. Protocol-related differences for Aβ(1-42) can be normalized at the (pre-)analytical level using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not by using the ratio Aβ(1-42)/tau. The addition of detergent at the time of collection eliminates differences due to adsorption. Conclusions: Our study recommends the use of low protein binding tubes for quantification in CSF (without additives) of all relevant CSF biomarkers. Pre-analytical factors have less effect on α-synuclein, neurogranin trunc P75, and totaltau, as compared to Aβ(1-42). The ratio of Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40), but not Aβ(1-42)/tau, can be used to adjust for pre-analytical differences in analyte concentrations. Our study does not recommend the inclusion of detergents at the time of collection of CSF. The present results provide an experimental basis for new recommendations for parallel analysis of several proteins using one protocol for collection and storage of CSF. Abstract Background The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects. The presence of brain pathology can be visualized in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by protein profiling. It is clear that the field of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) will benefit from an integration of algorithms including CSF concentrations of individual proteins, especially as an aid in clinical decision-making or to improve patient enrolment in clinical trials. The protein profiling approach requires standard operating procedures for collection and storage of CSF which must be easy to integrate into a routine clinical lab environment. Our study provides recommendations for analysis of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau, in combination with the ratio of β-amyloid Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40). Methods Protocols for CSF collection were compared with CSF derived from subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus (n = 19). Variables included recipient type (collection, storage), tube volume, and addition of detergents at the time of collection. CSF biomarker analysis was performed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models. Results Adsorption to recipients is lower for neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and tau (<10%), as compared to Aβ(1–42). For neurogranin trunc P75 and total tau, there is still an effect on analyte concentrations as a function of the tube volume. Protocol-related differences for Aβ(1–42) can be normalized at the (pre-)analytical level using the ratio Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40), but not by using the ratio Aβ(1–42)/tau. The addition of detergent at the time of collection eliminates differences due to adsorption. Conclusions Our study recommends the use of low protein binding tubes for quantification in CSF (without additives) of all relevant CSF biomarkers. Pre-analytical factors have less effect on α-synuclein, neurogranin trunc P75, and total tau, as compared to Aβ(1–42). The ratio of Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40), but not Aβ(1–42)/tau, can be used to adjust for pre-analytical differences in analyte concentrations. Our study does not recommend the inclusion of detergents at the time of collection of CSF. The present results provide an experimental basis for new recommendations for parallel analysis of several proteins using one protocol for collection and storage of CSF. |
ArticleNumber | 40 |
Author | Janelidze, Shorena Stoops, Erik Mauroo, Kimberley Vanderstichele, Hugo François, Cindy Herbst, Victor Demeyer, Leentje Coart, Els Hansson, Oskar |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Hugo surname: Vanderstichele fullname: Vanderstichele, Hugo email: Hugo.vanderstichele@adxneurosciences.com organization: ADx NeuroSciences – sequence: 2 givenname: Leentje surname: Demeyer fullname: Demeyer, Leentje organization: ADx NeuroSciences – sequence: 3 givenname: Shorena surname: Janelidze fullname: Janelidze, Shorena organization: Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University – sequence: 4 givenname: Els surname: Coart fullname: Coart, Els organization: IDDI – sequence: 5 givenname: Erik surname: Stoops fullname: Stoops, Erik organization: ADx NeuroSciences – sequence: 6 givenname: Kimberley surname: Mauroo fullname: Mauroo, Kimberley organization: ADx NeuroSciences – sequence: 7 givenname: Victor surname: Herbst fullname: Herbst, Victor organization: Euroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika – sequence: 8 givenname: Cindy surname: François fullname: François, Cindy organization: ADx NeuroSciences – sequence: 9 givenname: Oskar surname: Hansson fullname: Hansson, Oskar organization: Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28587660$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kstu1DAYhSNURC_wAGyQl63UUDuJL9kgjaoCI40E4rK2HOf3jKuMPdgJ1ex4B94DCR6kD8GT4JlMqw6LbhwrPuc7vpzj7MB5B1n2kuDXhAh2EUlJappjwnNcMJrzJ9kR4VTkNanLgwfzw-w4xmuMGStE9Sw7LAQVnDF8lP36BNovl-Ba1VvvIjI-IA0BmuDjyjrVIdMNtkXadx3ojWYr6ReAVFpdRxtRs0ZXs-nnCfIGORiCnwflrEN9GJxGHzk9R7e_87h2g-7AuvPkbFHv-wTv1YCSMu2hSWFb_I3tF2hy--eU_P3xsyrOLu7n-Ox59tSoLsKL3fck-_r26svl-3z24d30cjLLNa1FnyvdKFKw0hjasoqDwarkLS0Ub6DAJW1U0TDGRdlooRuucQ0UCtYS1XJDhSlPsunIbb26lqtglyqspVdWbn_4MJcq9DYdR7JasLLAjJe0qlrFVMNKnLi0qHUpGEssNbLiDayGZo-28iHdggwQQQW9kN0gI8ik6qweH0S22nDKQEgKzMhKK5C10iYNVAtc6ZYRnjLejBnJuoRWg-tD4u5F7a04u5Bz_13SKtmrDeB0Bwj-2wCxl0sbNXSdcuCHKEmNOcakEiJJXz3Mug-5K1US8FGgU4diACO17benSdG2kwTLTX3lWF-Z6is39ZWbXZD_nHfwxzzF7nqT1s0hyGs_hFTN-IjpH5hNCVs |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_talanta_2023_125229 crossref_primary_10_1515_cclm_2018_0147 crossref_primary_10_1002_wnan_1993 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_plabm_2024_e00425 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12031_019_1261_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12951_021_00852_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_trc2_12098 crossref_primary_10_3233_JPD_223285 crossref_primary_10_1093_labmed_lmaa062 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci12101414 crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_180563 crossref_primary_10_1021_acsmeasuresciau_3c00028 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13195_019_0517_9 crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_190069 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cca_2019_07_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jalz_2018_05_008 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/acn3.274 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1867 10.1111/jnc.13838 10.1515/cclm-2015-0733 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.4 10.3233/JAD-150883 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990301)20:3<431::AID-ELPS431>3.0.CO;2-2 10.3233/JAD-160722 10.3233/JAD-150953 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70299-6 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0 10.3233/JAD-150511 10.1016/j.jim.2015.08.003 10.3233/JAD-160227 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1285 10.1212/01.wnl.0000260698.46517.8f 10.1186/s13195-015-0124-3 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.10 10.1159/000112832 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.07.004 10.3233/JAD-160286 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 10.1056/NEJMp1208061 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.09.009 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.05.003 10.2217/bmm.12.46 10.1016/j.cca.2016.05.014 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s). 2017 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s). 2017 |
CorporateAuthor | MultiPark: Multidisciplinary research focused on Parkinson's disease Lunds universitet Profile areas and other strong research environments Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö Lund University Strategiska forskningsområden (SFO) Faculty of Medicine Strategic research areas (SRA) Clinical Memory Research Klinisk minnesforskning Medicinska fakulteten Profilområden och andra starka forskningsmiljöer Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Malmö |
CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: Faculty of Medicine – name: Medicinska fakulteten – name: Strategiska forskningsområden (SFO) – name: Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Malmö – name: Clinical Memory Research – name: Strategic research areas (SRA) – name: Lunds universitet – name: Klinisk minnesforskning – name: Profilområden och andra starka forskningsmiljöer – name: Lund University – name: Profile areas and other strong research environments – name: MultiPark: Multidisciplinary research focused on Parkinson's disease – name: Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM ADTPV AGCHP AOWAS D8T D95 ZZAVC DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s13195-017-0265-7 |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) SwePub SWEPUB Lunds universitet full text SwePub Articles SWEPUB Freely available online SWEPUB Lunds universitet SwePub Articles full text DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1758-9193 |
EndPage | 10 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_6986320673544da6ab630bc8529c3866 oai_portal_research_lu_se_publications_dcf756e8_5e6f_4cae_9acf_9a5c804cd617 PMC5461747 28587660 10_1186_s13195_017_0265_7 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23M 2WC 53G 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML ABDBF ABUWG ACGFS ACIHN ACJQM ACUHS ADBBV ADUKV AEAQA AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIAM AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU DIK E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EJD ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HMCUK HYE HZ~ IAO IEA IHR IHW INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M~E O5R O5S O9- OK1 P2P P6G PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ TR2 TUS UKHRP AAYXX ALIPV CITATION -56 -5G -BR 3V. ACRMQ ADINQ C24 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM ADTPV AGCHP AOWAS D8T D95 ZZAVC |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-acba1263ff5d647ef0a37d52a7be2035ba2b66783bc8cb7c09e5e26d1ad7f58f3 |
IEDL.DBID | C6C |
ISSN | 1758-9193 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:31:01 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 10 00:16:15 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:03:28 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 17:03:37 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 23:10:16 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:05 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:38:47 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:34:47 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Recommendations CSF Standardization Neurogranin Collection Tau Amyloid Synuclein |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c598t-acba1263ff5d647ef0a37d52a7be2035ba2b66783bc8cb7c09e5e26d1ad7f58f3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0265-7 |
PMID | 28587660 |
PQID | 1907001488 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6986320673544da6ab630bc8529c3866 swepub_primary_oai_portal_research_lu_se_publications_dcf756e8_5e6f_4cae_9acf_9a5c804cd617 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5461747 proquest_miscellaneous_1907001488 pubmed_primary_28587660 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13195_017_0265_7 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13195_017_0265_7 springer_journals_10_1186_s13195_017_0265_7 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-06-06 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-06-06 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2017 text: 2017-06-06 day: 06 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Alzheimer's research & therapy |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Alz Res Therapy |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Alzheimers Res Ther |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | MI Kester (265_CR26) 2015; 72 H Kvartsberg (265_CR27) 2015; 7 265_CR10 E Niemantsverdriet (265_CR19) 2016; 51 European Medicines Agency (265_CR6) 2011 B Dubois (265_CR4) 2014; 13 H Vanderstichele (265_CR8) 2012; 8 S Janelidze (265_CR12) 2016; 3 HMJ Vanderstichele (265_CR15) 2016; 53 A Vos De (265_CR25) 2016; 53 P Davidsson (265_CR24) 1999; 20 N Kruse (265_CR21) 2015; 36 R Barbour (265_CR29) 2008; 5 J Pannee (265_CR14) 2016; 139 CL Sutphen (265_CR16) 2015; 72 K Blennow (265_CR2) 2010; 6 T Bittner (265_CR11) 2016; 12 N Lelental (265_CR18) 2016; 52 LG Barrado (265_CR20) 2016; 49 SW Scheff (265_CR23) 2007; 68 CR Jack Jr (265_CR1) 2010; 9 L Parnetti (265_CR28) 2013; 9 M Campo del (265_CR9) 2012; 6 L Yang (265_CR5) 2012; 367 265_CR7 P Lewczuk (265_CR13) 2016; 55 GM McKhann (265_CR3) 2011; 7 M Bjerke (265_CR17) 2016; 54 N Kruse (265_CR22) 2015; 426 22047631 - Alzheimers Dement. 2012 Jan;8(1):65-73 23419373 - Nat Rev Neurol. 2013 Mar;9(3):131-40 27042676 - Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016 Jan 01;3(3):154-65 27792012 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Nov 19;55(2):813-822 20083042 - Lancet Neurol. 2010 Jan;9(1):119-28 17470753 - Neurology. 2007 May 1;68(18):1501-8 26366630 - JAMA Neurol. 2015 Nov;72 (11):1275-80 26967210 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Mar 1;52(1):51-64 21514250 - Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9 26495928 - Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Jul 1;54(7):1177-91 26484919 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2015 ;49(1):187-99 22931256 - N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 6;367 (10 ):885-7 26271436 - J Immunol Methods. 2015 Nov;426:70-5 26147946 - JAMA Neurol. 2015 Sep;72 (9):1029-42 27579672 - J Neurochem. 2016 Nov;139(4):651-658 24849862 - Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jun;13(6):614-29 22917144 - Biomark Med. 2012 Aug;6(4):419-30 10217148 - Electrophoresis. 1999 Mar;20(3):431-7 18182779 - Neurodegener Dis. 2008;5(2):55-9 27216941 - Clin Chim Acta. 2017 Apr;467:27-33 26136856 - Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015 Jul 01;7(1):40 26555316 - Alzheimers Dement. 2016 May;12(5):517-26 26093515 - Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Sep;36(9):2587-96 27392859 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Jul 6;53(4):1523-38 20157306 - Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Mar;6(3):131-44 26836187 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51(1):97-106 27258423 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 May 31;53(3):1121-32 |
References_xml | – volume: 3 start-page: 154 year: 2016 ident: 265_CR12 publication-title: Ann Clin Transl Neurol doi: 10.1002/acn3.274 – volume: 72 start-page: 1275 year: 2015 ident: 265_CR26 publication-title: JAMA Neurol doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1867 – volume: 139 start-page: 651 year: 2016 ident: 265_CR14 publication-title: J Neurochem doi: 10.1111/jnc.13838 – volume: 54 start-page: 1177 year: 2016 ident: 265_CR17 publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0733 – volume: 6 start-page: 131 year: 2010 ident: 265_CR2 publication-title: Nat Rev Neurol doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.4 – volume: 52 start-page: 51 year: 2016 ident: 265_CR18 publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis doi: 10.3233/JAD-150883 – volume: 20 start-page: 431 year: 1999 ident: 265_CR24 publication-title: Electrophoresis doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990301)20:3<431::AID-ELPS431>3.0.CO;2-2 – volume: 55 start-page: 813 year: 2016 ident: 265_CR13 publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis doi: 10.3233/JAD-160722 – volume: 51 start-page: 97 year: 2016 ident: 265_CR19 publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis doi: 10.3233/JAD-150953 – volume: 9 start-page: 119 year: 2010 ident: 265_CR1 publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70299-6 – volume: 13 start-page: 614 year: 2014 ident: 265_CR4 publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0 – volume: 49 start-page: 187 year: 2016 ident: 265_CR20 publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis doi: 10.3233/JAD-150511 – volume: 426 start-page: 70 year: 2015 ident: 265_CR22 publication-title: J Immunol Methods doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2015.08.003 – volume: 53 start-page: 1523 year: 2016 ident: 265_CR25 publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis doi: 10.3233/JAD-160227 – volume: 72 start-page: 1029 issue: 9 year: 2015 ident: 265_CR16 publication-title: JAMA Neurol doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1285 – volume: 68 start-page: 1501 year: 2007 ident: 265_CR23 publication-title: Neurology doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000260698.46517.8f – volume: 7 start-page: 40 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: 265_CR27 publication-title: Alzheimers Res Ther doi: 10.1186/s13195-015-0124-3 – volume-title: Qualification opinion of Alzheimer’s disease novel methodologies/biomarkers for BMS-708163 year: 2011 ident: 265_CR6 – volume: 9 start-page: 131 year: 2013 ident: 265_CR28 publication-title: Nat Rev Neurol doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.10 – volume: 5 start-page: 55 year: 2008 ident: 265_CR29 publication-title: Neurodegener Dis doi: 10.1159/000112832 – volume: 8 start-page: 65 year: 2012 ident: 265_CR8 publication-title: Alzheimers Dement doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.07.004 – volume: 53 start-page: 1121 year: 2016 ident: 265_CR15 publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis doi: 10.3233/JAD-160286 – volume: 7 start-page: 263 year: 2011 ident: 265_CR3 publication-title: Alzheimers Dement doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 – volume: 367 start-page: 885 year: 2012 ident: 265_CR5 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1208061 – ident: 265_CR7 – volume: 12 start-page: 517 year: 2016 ident: 265_CR11 publication-title: Alzheimers Dement doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.09.009 – volume: 36 start-page: 2587 year: 2015 ident: 265_CR21 publication-title: Neurobiol Aging doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.05.003 – volume: 6 start-page: 419 year: 2012 ident: 265_CR9 publication-title: Biomark Med doi: 10.2217/bmm.12.46 – ident: 265_CR10 doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.05.014 – reference: 27579672 - J Neurochem. 2016 Nov;139(4):651-658 – reference: 26967210 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Mar 1;52(1):51-64 – reference: 24849862 - Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jun;13(6):614-29 – reference: 27042676 - Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016 Jan 01;3(3):154-65 – reference: 20083042 - Lancet Neurol. 2010 Jan;9(1):119-28 – reference: 26271436 - J Immunol Methods. 2015 Nov;426:70-5 – reference: 22047631 - Alzheimers Dement. 2012 Jan;8(1):65-73 – reference: 27216941 - Clin Chim Acta. 2017 Apr;467:27-33 – reference: 26495928 - Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Jul 1;54(7):1177-91 – reference: 17470753 - Neurology. 2007 May 1;68(18):1501-8 – reference: 26484919 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2015 ;49(1):187-99 – reference: 27392859 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Jul 6;53(4):1523-38 – reference: 23419373 - Nat Rev Neurol. 2013 Mar;9(3):131-40 – reference: 27792012 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Nov 19;55(2):813-822 – reference: 26136856 - Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015 Jul 01;7(1):40 – reference: 27258423 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 May 31;53(3):1121-32 – reference: 18182779 - Neurodegener Dis. 2008;5(2):55-9 – reference: 21514250 - Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9 – reference: 26555316 - Alzheimers Dement. 2016 May;12(5):517-26 – reference: 22917144 - Biomark Med. 2012 Aug;6(4):419-30 – reference: 26093515 - Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Sep;36(9):2587-96 – reference: 22931256 - N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 6;367 (10 ):885-7 – reference: 26366630 - JAMA Neurol. 2015 Nov;72 (11):1275-80 – reference: 26836187 - J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51(1):97-106 – reference: 20157306 - Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Mar;6(3):131-44 – reference: 10217148 - Electrophoresis. 1999 Mar;20(3):431-7 – reference: 26147946 - JAMA Neurol. 2015 Sep;72 (9):1029-42 |
SSID | ssj0066284 |
Score | 2.2066495 |
Snippet | Background
The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in... The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in the brains of... Background: The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several hallmarks in... Abstract Background The pathophysiology of neurodegeneration is complex. Its diagnosis requires an early identification of sequential changes in several... |
SourceID | doaj swepub pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 40 |
SubjectTerms | alpha-Synuclein - cerebrospinal fluid Amyloid beta-Peptides - cerebrospinal fluid Belgium Biomarkers - cerebrospinal fluid Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cerebrospinal Fluid - metabolism Collection CSF Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - standards Female Geriatric Psychiatry Geriatrics/Gerontology Humans Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - cerebrospinal fluid Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - diagnosis Male Middle Aged Neurogranin Neurogranin - cerebrospinal fluid Neurology Neurosciences Peptide Fragments - cerebrospinal fluid Practice Guidelines as Topic Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Specimen Handling - instrumentation Specimen Handling - methods Specimen Handling - standards Standardization Synuclein Tau tau Proteins - cerebrospinal fluid |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwELZQT1wQiL-FgozEgUKjTWJ77BwX1KoghJCgUsXF8i9daZutmt1Db7wD74EED9KH4EkYO9lVF1C5IEVRlNjJJDOe-Sa2viHkKQdwzJexEMrUBZdpSAmwhWyk8UpIy2JeIPsODg75myNxdKnUV1oT1tMD9x9uDI0CljjGmeDcGzAWWGmdEnXjmIJMto1hbJVM9T4YAL3uMIdZKRh3FUs1CZNHxpxDFHIjCmWy_r8hzD8XSq5nS39jFs3RaP8muTHASDrpxb9FroX2NvmWcsmTkzDUSeooAlLqwhmmvak6SOoQZ8upp0n5eQlWm5sgBqRmICeh9pzuvX39YULnkWayy88YzaYtXZxhBKTvpdilF9-L7rxNRMjTdhd7erqYI4anC7Ok2BJlwHQ7i0DTb146ufjxrPr55Suvd8br43LnDjnc3_v46qAY6jEUTjRqURhnTVUDi1F44DLE0jDpRW2kDXXJhDW1BQx-DNXjrHRlE0SowVfGyyhUZHfJVjtvw31CA6alFiI3sfG8imAavLGKxsbGMIR9I1Ku9KPdQFaeambMdE5aFOhepRpVqpNKtRyR5-supz1Tx1WNXyalrxsmku18Ak1PD6an_2V6I_JkZTIaB2WaaTFtmC87jSgrzeejcxyRe70JrR9VK4ERCMoRkRvGtSHL5pV2epyJvwVHvMlR-BcrM9SDx-muetVPvaVuPiAnd3pglDrWs6Xugj699KtYexelgKC0CBA1dyboxriIO-FUyZ1HYR78j-_4kFyv89AE3LbJFhp0eIRQb2Ef51H9CzbnVMM priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Recommendations for cerebrospinal fluid collection for the analysis by ELISA of neurogranin trunc P75, α-synuclein, and total tau in combination with Aβ(1–42)/Aβ(1–40) |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13195-017-0265-7 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28587660 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1907001488 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5461747 https://doaj.org/article/6986320673544da6ab630bc8529c3866 |
Volume | 9 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVADU databaseName: BioMedCentral customDbUrl: eissn: 1758-9193 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0066284 issn: 1758-9193 databaseCode: RBZ dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/ providerName: BioMedCentral – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1758-9193 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0066284 issn: 1758-9193 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1758-9193 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0066284 issn: 1758-9193 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVEBS databaseName: Academic Search Ultimate - eBooks customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn eissn: 1758-9193 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0066284 issn: 1758-9193 databaseCode: ABDBF dateStart: 20100101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn providerName: EBSCOhost – providerCode: PRVBFR databaseName: Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1758-9193 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0066284 issn: 1758-9193 databaseCode: DIK dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com providerName: Flying Publisher – providerCode: PRVFQY databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1758-9193 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0066284 issn: 1758-9193 databaseCode: GX1 dateStart: 0 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1758-9193 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0066284 issn: 1758-9193 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVAQN databaseName: PubMed Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1758-9193 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0066284 issn: 1758-9193 databaseCode: RPM dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ providerName: National Library of Medicine – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1758-9193 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0066284 issn: 1758-9193 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20150101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 eissn: 1758-9193 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0066284 issn: 1758-9193 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20150101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: HAS SpringerNature Open Access 2022 customDbUrl: eissn: 1758-9193 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0066284 issn: 1758-9193 databaseCode: AAJSJ dateStart: 20090601 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.springernature.com providerName: Springer Nature – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1758-9193 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0066284 issn: 1758-9193 databaseCode: C6C dateStart: 20090601 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.springeropen.com/ providerName: Springer Nature |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3NahsxEBZNcumltPTP_TEq9NC0WbJeSSPt0TEOaSkhtA2YXoSklRKDsw5Z-5Bb36HvUWgfJA_RJ-lIXpu4DYGCMWYtrWaZf432G0JecwDHqjxkQpki4zKqlACbyVKaSglpWUgHZA_h4Jh_GIlRCxYd34W5Xr_vKdhteix2E4y2FLMFkckNsiXQ7sbTewMYLI0uAJrZtmh547Q1t5PQ-W8KKf89Gbkqj_4FJZrcz_59cq-NG2l_wegH5I6vH5IfMXk8O_NtY6SGYgRKnb_APDe2A4kTwmQ-rmjkdjpzVachGPRR06KRUHtJhx_ff-7TaaAJ3fIE3de4prMLdHn0SIodevUzay7riHw8rndwZkVnUwza6czMKY5EGjC_TiTQuK9L-1e_3vR-f_vOi-3d1e98-xE53h9-GRxkbQOGzIlSzTLjrOkVwEIQFXDpQ26YrERhpPVFzoQ1hQX0dsw65ax0eemFL6DqmUoGoQJ7TDbrae2fEuoxD7UQuAllxXsBTIk3VsHYUBqGcV6H5Ev-aNeik8cmGROdshQFesFSjSzVkaVadsjb1ZTzBTTHbYP3ItNXAyOqdrqAwqZbJdVQKmARz54JzisDxgLL8dlEUTqmADrk1VJkNGphLK2Y2k_njcawKhbw0Rp2yJOFCK2WKpRAlwN5h8g14VqjZf2fenyakL4FxwCTI_HvlmKoWxPT3PaoXxeSur5AyuZ0CyF1qidz3Xh9fm1vWFcuSAFeaeEhaO6M16VxAb-EUzl3FRLz7L9IeU7uFkkHAT8vyCZKrn-JQdzMdsmGHMku2dobHh596iZl7qYNkT_a-0ni |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3NbtQwELagPcAFgfhbfo3EgUKjZmN77BwX1KpdlgqprVRxsWzHbldqs1Wze-iNd-A9kOBB-hA8CWNvsmKhqoQURVFiJxPNf8b5hpDXHMCxKg-ZUKbIuIwqJcBmspSmUkJaFtIC2V3YPuDDQ3HY_sfddKvdu5JkstRJrRVsNH0W-wpGq4p5g8jkTbKqhAC-QlYHg-HesDPAAGhy2wLmlROXXFBC6r8qvPx3leSiVPoXrGhyRVt3yZ02hqSDOdPvkRu-vk--x0Ty9NS3TZIaitEodf4cc97YGiROCCezcUUj59P6qzoNwQCQmhaZhNoLujna2RvQSaAJ6fIIXdm4ptNzdH_0sxTr9PJH1lzUEQV5XK_jzIpOJxjA06mZURyJNGCunUig8RsvHVz-fNP_9fUbL9Y2Fsf52gNysLW5_2E7a5sxZE6UapoZZ02_ABaCqIBLH3LDZCUKI60vciasKSyg52PWKWely0svfAFV31QyCBXYQ7JST2r_mFCPOamFwE0oK94PYEq8sQrGhtIwjPl6JO_4o12LVB4bZpzolLEo0HOWamSpjizVskfeLqaczWE6rhv8PjJ9MTAibKcTk_Mj3SqshlIBi9j2THBeGTAWWI7vJorSMQXQI686kdGokbHMYmo_mTUaQ6xYzEfL2COP5iK0eFShBLofyHtELgnXEi3LV-rxcUL9FhyDTY7Ev-vEULfmprnuVb_MJXX5ASmz0y2c1LE-menG67M_vhPrygUpwCstPATNnfG6NC7gTjiVc1chMU_-i5SX5Nb2_qeRHu3sfnxKbhdJHwG3Z2QFpdg_x-Bual-0yvwbDbBOzQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3datRAFB60BfFGFP_W3xG8sNrQbGbmzORy1S7tWkqhFoo3w_y2C222NLsXvfMdfA9BH6QP4ZN4JskurpaCEEJIZpITzn_O5DuEvOYAjvk8ZkKZIuMyqZQAm8lSGq-EtCw2C2R3YeuAjw7FYdfntJ6vdp-XJNt_GhJKUzXdOPOxVXEFG3WfpR6DycJiDiEyeZOsKlECZl-rg8FofzQ3xgBofrti5pUTl9xRg9p_Vaj574rJRdn0L4jRxi0N75I7XTxJB60A3CM3QnWffE9J5elp6Bom1RQjU-rCOea_qU1ImhBPZmNPkxQ0a7GqZggGg9R0KCXUXtDNne39AZ1E2qBeHqFbG1d0eo6ukO5JsU4vf2T1RZUQkcfVOs70dDrBYJ5OzYziSKQB8-6GBJq-99LB5c83_V9fv_FibWNxnK89IAfDzc8ftrKuMUPmRKmmmXHW9AtgMQoPXIaYGya9KIy0ociZsKawgF6QWaeclS4vgwgF-L7xMgoV2UOyUk2q8JjQgPmphchNLD3vRzAl3lhFY2NpGMZ_PZLP-aNdh1qemmec6CZ7UaBblmpkqU4s1bJH3i6mnLWQHdcNfp-YvhiY0LabE5PzI90pr4ZSAUs490xw7g0YCyzHdxNF6ZgC6JFXc5HRqJ2p5GKqMJnVGsOtVNhHK9kjj1oRWjyqUAJdEeQ9IpeEa4mW5SvV-LhBABccA0-OxL-bi6HuTE993at-aSV1-QFNlqc7aKljfTLTddBnf3wz1t5FKSAoLQJEzZ0JujQu4k44lXPnkZgn_0XKS3Jr7-NQ72zvfnpKbheNOgJuz8gKCnF4jnHe1L7odPk3Ro1TFw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recommendations+for+cerebrospinal+fluid+collection+for+the+analysis+by+ELISA+of+neurogranin+trunc+P75%2C+%CE%B1-synuclein%2C+and+total+tau+in+combination+with+A%CE%B2%281%E2%80%9342%29%2FA%CE%B2%281%E2%80%9340%29&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer%27s+research+%26+therapy&rft.au=Vanderstichele%2C+Hugo&rft.au=Demeyer%2C+Leentje&rft.au=Janelidze%2C+Shorena&rft.au=Coart%2C+Els&rft.date=2017-06-06&rft.issn=1758-9193&rft.eissn=1758-9193&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13195-017-0265-7&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s13195_017_0265_7 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1758-9193&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1758-9193&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1758-9193&client=summon |