Exploring health equity integration among health service and delivery systems in Nova Scotia: perspectives of health system partners
Background Achieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured within health service and delivery systems. To improve population health, it is necessary to understand barriers and facilitators to health equi...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal for equity in health Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 171 - 14 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
26.08.2024
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1475-9276 1475-9276 |
DOI | 10.1186/s12939-024-02256-7 |
Cover
Abstract | Background
Achieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured within health service and delivery systems. To improve population health, it is necessary to understand barriers and facilitators to health equity integration within health service and delivery systems. This study aimed to explore health equity integration among health systems workers and identify key barriers and facilitators to implementing health equity strategies within the health service and delivery system in Nova Scotia, ahead of the release of a Health Equity Framework, focused on addressing inequities within publicly funded institutions.
Methods
Purposive sampling was used to recruit individuals working on health equity initiatives including those in high-level leadership positions within the Nova Scotia health system. Individual interviews and a joint interview session were conducted. Topics of discussion included current integration of health equity through existing strategies and perceptions within participant roles. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide coding and analysis, with interviews transcribed and deductively analyzed in NVivo. Qualitative description was employed to describe study findings as barriers and facilitators to health equity integration.
Results
Eleven individual interviews and one joint interview (
n
= 5 participants) were conducted, a total of 16 participants. Half (
n
= 8) of the participants were High-level Leaders (i.e., manager or higher) within the health system. We found that existing strategies within the health system were inadequate to address inequities, and variation in the use of indicators of health equity was indicative of a lack of health equity integration. Applying the CFIR allowed us to identify barriers to and facilitators of health equity integration, with the power of legislation to implement a Health Equity Framework, alongside the value of partnerships and engagement both being seen as key facilitators to support health equity integration. Barriers to health equity integration included inadequate resources devoted to health equity work, a lack of diversity among senior system leaders and concerns that existing efforts to integrate health equity were siloed.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that health equity integration needs to be prioritized within the health service and delivery system within Nova Scotia and identifies possible strategies for implementation. Appropriate measures, resources and partnerships need to be put in place to support health equity integration following the introduction of the Health Equity Framework, which was viewed as a key driver for action. Greater diversity within health system leadership was also identified as an important strategy to support integration. Our findings have implications for other jurisdictions seeking to advance health equity across health service and delivery systems. |
---|---|
AbstractList | BackgroundAchieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured within health service and delivery systems. To improve population health, it is necessary to understand barriers and facilitators to health equity integration within health service and delivery systems. This study aimed to explore health equity integration among health systems workers and identify key barriers and facilitators to implementing health equity strategies within the health service and delivery system in Nova Scotia, ahead of the release of a Health Equity Framework, focused on addressing inequities within publicly funded institutions.MethodsPurposive sampling was used to recruit individuals working on health equity initiatives including those in high-level leadership positions within the Nova Scotia health system. Individual interviews and a joint interview session were conducted. Topics of discussion included current integration of health equity through existing strategies and perceptions within participant roles. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide coding and analysis, with interviews transcribed and deductively analyzed in NVivo. Qualitative description was employed to describe study findings as barriers and facilitators to health equity integration.ResultsEleven individual interviews and one joint interview (n = 5 participants) were conducted, a total of 16 participants. Half (n = 8) of the participants were High-level Leaders (i.e., manager or higher) within the health system. We found that existing strategies within the health system were inadequate to address inequities, and variation in the use of indicators of health equity was indicative of a lack of health equity integration. Applying the CFIR allowed us to identify barriers to and facilitators of health equity integration, with the power of legislation to implement a Health Equity Framework, alongside the value of partnerships and engagement both being seen as key facilitators to support health equity integration. Barriers to health equity integration included inadequate resources devoted to health equity work, a lack of diversity among senior system leaders and concerns that existing efforts to integrate health equity were siloed.ConclusionOur findings suggest that health equity integration needs to be prioritized within the health service and delivery system within Nova Scotia and identifies possible strategies for implementation. Appropriate measures, resources and partnerships need to be put in place to support health equity integration following the introduction of the Health Equity Framework, which was viewed as a key driver for action. Greater diversity within health system leadership was also identified as an important strategy to support integration. Our findings have implications for other jurisdictions seeking to advance health equity across health service and delivery systems. Achieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured within health service and delivery systems. To improve population health, it is necessary to understand barriers and facilitators to health equity integration within health service and delivery systems. This study aimed to explore health equity integration among health systems workers and identify key barriers and facilitators to implementing health equity strategies within the health service and delivery system in Nova Scotia, ahead of the release of a Health Equity Framework, focused on addressing inequities within publicly funded institutions. Purposive sampling was used to recruit individuals working on health equity initiatives including those in high-level leadership positions within the Nova Scotia health system. Individual interviews and a joint interview session were conducted. Topics of discussion included current integration of health equity through existing strategies and perceptions within participant roles. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide coding and analysis, with interviews transcribed and deductively analyzed in NVivo. Qualitative description was employed to describe study findings as barriers and facilitators to health equity integration. Eleven individual interviews and one joint interview (n = 5 participants) were conducted, a total of 16 participants. Half (n = 8) of the participants were High-level Leaders (i.e., manager or higher) within the health system. We found that existing strategies within the health system were inadequate to address inequities, and variation in the use of indicators of health equity was indicative of a lack of health equity integration. Applying the CFIR allowed us to identify barriers to and facilitators of health equity integration, with the power of legislation to implement a Health Equity Framework, alongside the value of partnerships and engagement both being seen as key facilitators to support health equity integration. Barriers to health equity integration included inadequate resources devoted to health equity work, a lack of diversity among senior system leaders and concerns that existing efforts to integrate health equity were siloed. Our findings suggest that health equity integration needs to be prioritized within the health service and delivery system within Nova Scotia and identifies possible strategies for implementation. Appropriate measures, resources and partnerships need to be put in place to support health equity integration following the introduction of the Health Equity Framework, which was viewed as a key driver for action. Greater diversity within health system leadership was also identified as an important strategy to support integration. Our findings have implications for other jurisdictions seeking to advance health equity across health service and delivery systems. Achieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured within health service and delivery systems. To improve population health, it is necessary to understand barriers and facilitators to health equity integration within health service and delivery systems. This study aimed to explore health equity integration among health systems workers and identify key barriers and facilitators to implementing health equity strategies within the health service and delivery system in Nova Scotia, ahead of the release of a Health Equity Framework, focused on addressing inequities within publicly funded institutions. Purposive sampling was used to recruit individuals working on health equity initiatives including those in high-level leadership positions within the Nova Scotia health system. Individual interviews and a joint interview session were conducted. Topics of discussion included current integration of health equity through existing strategies and perceptions within participant roles. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide coding and analysis, with interviews transcribed and deductively analyzed in NVivo. Qualitative description was employed to describe study findings as barriers and facilitators to health equity integration. Eleven individual interviews and one joint interview (n = 5 participants) were conducted, a total of 16 participants. Half (n = 8) of the participants were High-level Leaders (i.e., manager or higher) within the health system. We found that existing strategies within the health system were inadequate to address inequities, and variation in the use of indicators of health equity was indicative of a lack of health equity integration. Applying the CFIR allowed us to identify barriers to and facilitators of health equity integration, with the power of legislation to implement a Health Equity Framework, alongside the value of partnerships and engagement both being seen as key facilitators to support health equity integration. Barriers to health equity integration included inadequate resources devoted to health equity work, a lack of diversity among senior system leaders and concerns that existing efforts to integrate health equity were siloed. Our findings suggest that health equity integration needs to be prioritized within the health service and delivery system within Nova Scotia and identifies possible strategies for implementation. Appropriate measures, resources and partnerships need to be put in place to support health equity integration following the introduction of the Health Equity Framework, which was viewed as a key driver for action. Greater diversity within health system leadership was also identified as an important strategy to support integration. Our findings have implications for other jurisdictions seeking to advance health equity across health service and delivery systems. Achieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured within health service and delivery systems. To improve population health, it is necessary to understand barriers and facilitators to health equity integration within health service and delivery systems. This study aimed to explore health equity integration among health systems workers and identify key barriers and facilitators to implementing health equity strategies within the health service and delivery system in Nova Scotia, ahead of the release of a Health Equity Framework, focused on addressing inequities within publicly funded institutions.BACKGROUNDAchieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured within health service and delivery systems. To improve population health, it is necessary to understand barriers and facilitators to health equity integration within health service and delivery systems. This study aimed to explore health equity integration among health systems workers and identify key barriers and facilitators to implementing health equity strategies within the health service and delivery system in Nova Scotia, ahead of the release of a Health Equity Framework, focused on addressing inequities within publicly funded institutions.Purposive sampling was used to recruit individuals working on health equity initiatives including those in high-level leadership positions within the Nova Scotia health system. Individual interviews and a joint interview session were conducted. Topics of discussion included current integration of health equity through existing strategies and perceptions within participant roles. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide coding and analysis, with interviews transcribed and deductively analyzed in NVivo. Qualitative description was employed to describe study findings as barriers and facilitators to health equity integration.METHODSPurposive sampling was used to recruit individuals working on health equity initiatives including those in high-level leadership positions within the Nova Scotia health system. Individual interviews and a joint interview session were conducted. Topics of discussion included current integration of health equity through existing strategies and perceptions within participant roles. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide coding and analysis, with interviews transcribed and deductively analyzed in NVivo. Qualitative description was employed to describe study findings as barriers and facilitators to health equity integration.Eleven individual interviews and one joint interview (n = 5 participants) were conducted, a total of 16 participants. Half (n = 8) of the participants were High-level Leaders (i.e., manager or higher) within the health system. We found that existing strategies within the health system were inadequate to address inequities, and variation in the use of indicators of health equity was indicative of a lack of health equity integration. Applying the CFIR allowed us to identify barriers to and facilitators of health equity integration, with the power of legislation to implement a Health Equity Framework, alongside the value of partnerships and engagement both being seen as key facilitators to support health equity integration. Barriers to health equity integration included inadequate resources devoted to health equity work, a lack of diversity among senior system leaders and concerns that existing efforts to integrate health equity were siloed.RESULTSEleven individual interviews and one joint interview (n = 5 participants) were conducted, a total of 16 participants. Half (n = 8) of the participants were High-level Leaders (i.e., manager or higher) within the health system. We found that existing strategies within the health system were inadequate to address inequities, and variation in the use of indicators of health equity was indicative of a lack of health equity integration. Applying the CFIR allowed us to identify barriers to and facilitators of health equity integration, with the power of legislation to implement a Health Equity Framework, alongside the value of partnerships and engagement both being seen as key facilitators to support health equity integration. Barriers to health equity integration included inadequate resources devoted to health equity work, a lack of diversity among senior system leaders and concerns that existing efforts to integrate health equity were siloed.Our findings suggest that health equity integration needs to be prioritized within the health service and delivery system within Nova Scotia and identifies possible strategies for implementation. Appropriate measures, resources and partnerships need to be put in place to support health equity integration following the introduction of the Health Equity Framework, which was viewed as a key driver for action. Greater diversity within health system leadership was also identified as an important strategy to support integration. Our findings have implications for other jurisdictions seeking to advance health equity across health service and delivery systems.CONCLUSIONOur findings suggest that health equity integration needs to be prioritized within the health service and delivery system within Nova Scotia and identifies possible strategies for implementation. Appropriate measures, resources and partnerships need to be put in place to support health equity integration following the introduction of the Health Equity Framework, which was viewed as a key driver for action. Greater diversity within health system leadership was also identified as an important strategy to support integration. Our findings have implications for other jurisdictions seeking to advance health equity across health service and delivery systems. Background Achieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured within health service and delivery systems. To improve population health, it is necessary to understand barriers and facilitators to health equity integration within health service and delivery systems. This study aimed to explore health equity integration among health systems workers and identify key barriers and facilitators to implementing health equity strategies within the health service and delivery system in Nova Scotia, ahead of the release of a Health Equity Framework, focused on addressing inequities within publicly funded institutions. Methods Purposive sampling was used to recruit individuals working on health equity initiatives including those in high-level leadership positions within the Nova Scotia health system. Individual interviews and a joint interview session were conducted. Topics of discussion included current integration of health equity through existing strategies and perceptions within participant roles. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide coding and analysis, with interviews transcribed and deductively analyzed in NVivo. Qualitative description was employed to describe study findings as barriers and facilitators to health equity integration. Results Eleven individual interviews and one joint interview (n = 5 participants) were conducted, a total of 16 participants. Half (n = 8) of the participants were High-level Leaders (i.e., manager or higher) within the health system. We found that existing strategies within the health system were inadequate to address inequities, and variation in the use of indicators of health equity was indicative of a lack of health equity integration. Applying the CFIR allowed us to identify barriers to and facilitators of health equity integration, with the power of legislation to implement a Health Equity Framework, alongside the value of partnerships and engagement both being seen as key facilitators to support health equity integration. Barriers to health equity integration included inadequate resources devoted to health equity work, a lack of diversity among senior system leaders and concerns that existing efforts to integrate health equity were siloed. Conclusion Our findings suggest that health equity integration needs to be prioritized within the health service and delivery system within Nova Scotia and identifies possible strategies for implementation. Appropriate measures, resources and partnerships need to be put in place to support health equity integration following the introduction of the Health Equity Framework, which was viewed as a key driver for action. Greater diversity within health system leadership was also identified as an important strategy to support integration. Our findings have implications for other jurisdictions seeking to advance health equity across health service and delivery systems. Keywords: Health equity, Delivery of Health Care, Attitude of Health personnel, Health priorities Abstract Background Achieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured within health service and delivery systems. To improve population health, it is necessary to understand barriers and facilitators to health equity integration within health service and delivery systems. This study aimed to explore health equity integration among health systems workers and identify key barriers and facilitators to implementing health equity strategies within the health service and delivery system in Nova Scotia, ahead of the release of a Health Equity Framework, focused on addressing inequities within publicly funded institutions. Methods Purposive sampling was used to recruit individuals working on health equity initiatives including those in high-level leadership positions within the Nova Scotia health system. Individual interviews and a joint interview session were conducted. Topics of discussion included current integration of health equity through existing strategies and perceptions within participant roles. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide coding and analysis, with interviews transcribed and deductively analyzed in NVivo. Qualitative description was employed to describe study findings as barriers and facilitators to health equity integration. Results Eleven individual interviews and one joint interview (n = 5 participants) were conducted, a total of 16 participants. Half (n = 8) of the participants were High-level Leaders (i.e., manager or higher) within the health system. We found that existing strategies within the health system were inadequate to address inequities, and variation in the use of indicators of health equity was indicative of a lack of health equity integration. Applying the CFIR allowed us to identify barriers to and facilitators of health equity integration, with the power of legislation to implement a Health Equity Framework, alongside the value of partnerships and engagement both being seen as key facilitators to support health equity integration. Barriers to health equity integration included inadequate resources devoted to health equity work, a lack of diversity among senior system leaders and concerns that existing efforts to integrate health equity were siloed. Conclusion Our findings suggest that health equity integration needs to be prioritized within the health service and delivery system within Nova Scotia and identifies possible strategies for implementation. Appropriate measures, resources and partnerships need to be put in place to support health equity integration following the introduction of the Health Equity Framework, which was viewed as a key driver for action. Greater diversity within health system leadership was also identified as an important strategy to support integration. Our findings have implications for other jurisdictions seeking to advance health equity across health service and delivery systems. Background Achieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured within health service and delivery systems. To improve population health, it is necessary to understand barriers and facilitators to health equity integration within health service and delivery systems. This study aimed to explore health equity integration among health systems workers and identify key barriers and facilitators to implementing health equity strategies within the health service and delivery system in Nova Scotia, ahead of the release of a Health Equity Framework, focused on addressing inequities within publicly funded institutions. Methods Purposive sampling was used to recruit individuals working on health equity initiatives including those in high-level leadership positions within the Nova Scotia health system. Individual interviews and a joint interview session were conducted. Topics of discussion included current integration of health equity through existing strategies and perceptions within participant roles. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide coding and analysis, with interviews transcribed and deductively analyzed in NVivo. Qualitative description was employed to describe study findings as barriers and facilitators to health equity integration. Results Eleven individual interviews and one joint interview ( n = 5 participants) were conducted, a total of 16 participants. Half ( n = 8) of the participants were High-level Leaders (i.e., manager or higher) within the health system. We found that existing strategies within the health system were inadequate to address inequities, and variation in the use of indicators of health equity was indicative of a lack of health equity integration. Applying the CFIR allowed us to identify barriers to and facilitators of health equity integration, with the power of legislation to implement a Health Equity Framework, alongside the value of partnerships and engagement both being seen as key facilitators to support health equity integration. Barriers to health equity integration included inadequate resources devoted to health equity work, a lack of diversity among senior system leaders and concerns that existing efforts to integrate health equity were siloed. Conclusion Our findings suggest that health equity integration needs to be prioritized within the health service and delivery system within Nova Scotia and identifies possible strategies for implementation. Appropriate measures, resources and partnerships need to be put in place to support health equity integration following the introduction of the Health Equity Framework, which was viewed as a key driver for action. Greater diversity within health system leadership was also identified as an important strategy to support integration. Our findings have implications for other jurisdictions seeking to advance health equity across health service and delivery systems. |
ArticleNumber | 171 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Yusuf, Joshua D’Souza, Ninoshka J. F.L. Kirk, Sara Meaghan Sim, Sarah Embrett, Mark A.T. Caldwell, Hilary |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Joshua surname: Yusuf fullname: Yusuf, Joshua organization: School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Healthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University – sequence: 2 givenname: Ninoshka J. surname: D’Souza fullname: D’Souza, Ninoshka J. organization: Healthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University – sequence: 3 givenname: Hilary surname: A.T. Caldwell fullname: A.T. Caldwell, Hilary organization: Healthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University – sequence: 4 givenname: Sarah surname: Meaghan Sim fullname: Meaghan Sim, Sarah organization: Nova Scotia Health – sequence: 5 givenname: Mark surname: Embrett fullname: Embrett, Mark organization: Nova Scotia Health – sequence: 6 givenname: Sara surname: F.L. Kirk fullname: F.L. Kirk, Sara email: Sara.Kirk@dal.ca organization: School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Healthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39187882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kl9vFCEUxSemxv7RL-CDmcQXfZg6DDCAL03TVN2k0cTqM2HhzizNzDAFZtN994PL7tbdrjGGEMjldw5wc06zo8ENkGWvUXmOEK8_BFQJLIqyImlWtC7Ys-wEEUYLUbH66Mn-ODsN4a4sEeM1e5EdY4E447w6yX5dP4yd83Zo8wWoLi5yuJ9sXOV2iNB6Fa0bctW7_XkAv7QacjWY3EBnl-BXeViFCH1IqvyrW6r8Vrto1cd8BB9G0DFRIXfNzmOD56PycUjEy-x5o7oArx7Xs-znp-sfV1-Km2-fZ1eXN4WmAsdCA9G6QfMKG0YN4Y1ilCqBKVKMkApjggCoMY1hikHTUKgVFcoQhrGac47PstnW1zh1J0dve-VX0ikrNwXnW5leZHUHsq7qkhKD5gA14RoL0yBgyqSWc4EoJK-Lrdc4zXswGoboVXdgengy2IVs3VIihAkVtE4O7x4dvLufIETZ26Ch69QAbgoSl4IRgSuOEvr2L_TOTX5IvZIYlRUtKRV8T7Uq_cAOjUsX67WpvOQlx4yUnCTq_B9UGgZ6q1PCGpvqB4L3B4LERHiIrZpCkLPb74fsm6dd2bXjT-ASUG0B7V0IHpodgkq5TrXcplqmVMtNqiVLIrwVhXGdVPD77_9H9RvQcPqt |
Cites_doi | 10.11124/JBIES-21-00001 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0 10.1186/s12939-020-01276-3 10.1093/heapro/day047 10.1186/s13012-021-01097-0 10.1177/00333549141291S204 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301926 10.1007/s13142-017-0503-3 10.1186/s12939-023-02053-8 10.1007/s11524-021-00556-9 10.1186/s12939-016-0419-4 10.1002/lrh2.10279 10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z 10.1186/s12939-020-01299-w 10.3138/9781487515928 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x 10.1001/jama.2021.25181 10.1111/1475-6773.14192 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1 10.3934/publichealth.2017.5.490 10.11124/JBIES-23-00051 10.17269/s41997-021-00534-3 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004851 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2024 2024. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2024 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2024 – notice: 2024. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2024 2024 |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISR 3V. 7TQ 7X7 7XB 88E 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BHPHI CCPQU COVID DHY DON DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. M0S M1P PATMY PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PYCSY 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12939-024-02256-7 |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) PAIS Index Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Public Health Database ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Database Suite (ProQuest) Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Coronavirus Research Database PAIS International PAIS International (Ovid) ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Collection (ProQuest) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Environmental Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Environmental Science Collection MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Public Health ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition PAIS International Environmental Science Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 5 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Public Health |
EISSN | 1475-9276 |
EndPage | 14 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_626054d1bee648c39df1e7ad1298915e PMC11345956 A808374084 39187882 10_1186_s12939_024_02256_7 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Nova Scotia Canada Nova Scotia Canada |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Nova Scotia – name: Canada – name: Nova Scotia Canada |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Canadian Institutes of Health Research grantid: RPH170322; RPH170322; RPH170322; RPH170322; RPH170322; RPH170322 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000024 – fundername: CIHR grantid: RPH170322 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29J 2WC 2XV 44B 53G 5VS 7X7 7XC 88E 8C1 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACIHN ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS ATCPS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ISR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 MK0 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PATMY PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO PYCSY RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB ~8M AAYXX ALIPV CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 3V. 7TQ 7XB 8FK AZQEC COVID DHY DON DWQXO GNUQQ K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-ce4ccf1b23d75d48fa755a9351a74423341ee5ddfd7a7eff5e6a59ad4733ab883 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1475-9276 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:23:58 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:32:17 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 11:05:50 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 22:28:06 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:04:11 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:59:45 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 06:03:13 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:03:08 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:45:15 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:33:20 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Health equity Attitude of Health personnel Delivery of Health Care Health priorities |
Language | English |
License | 2024. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c593t-ce4ccf1b23d75d48fa755a9351a74423341ee5ddfd7a7eff5e6a59ad4733ab883 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/626054d1bee648c39df1e7ad1298915e |
PMID | 39187882 |
PQID | 3102505598 |
PQPubID | 44529 |
PageCount | 14 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_626054d1bee648c39df1e7ad1298915e pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11345956 proquest_miscellaneous_3097493281 proquest_journals_3102505598 gale_infotracmisc_A808374084 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A808374084 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A808374084 pubmed_primary_39187882 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12939_024_02256_7 springer_journals_10_1186_s12939_024_02256_7 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-08-26 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-08-26 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2024 text: 2024-08-26 day: 26 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
PublicationTitle | International journal for equity in health |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Int J Equity Health |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Int J Equity Health |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
References | 2256_CR6 S Elo (2256_CR20) 2008; 62 2256_CR9 MP Eccles (2256_CR12) 2006; 1 T van Roode (2256_CR28) 2020; 19 C McPherson (2256_CR33) 2016; 15 2256_CR1 2256_CR2 S Fawcett (2256_CR23) 2010; 7 2256_CR3 2256_CR21 G Corbie (2256_CR35) 2022; 97 2256_CR4 N Garzón-Orjuela (2256_CR8) 2020; 19 A Parsons (2256_CR37) 2021; 5 S Brushett (2256_CR19) 2022; 20 LJ Damschroder (2256_CR13) 2022; 17 O Biermann (2256_CR31) 2021; 98 JAK Alhassan (2256_CR24) 2021; 112 FC Stanford (2256_CR10) 2020; 112 J Herrin (2256_CR34) 2018; 44 RC Brownson (2256_CR29) 2021; 16 A Guichard (2256_CR22) 2019; 34 LM Anderson (2256_CR25) 2015; 2015 2256_CR30 MA Kirk (2256_CR14) 2016; 11 BM Pauly (2256_CR38) 2017; 4 2256_CR11 2256_CR16 2256_CR17 2256_CR39 2256_CR15 DJ Chisolm (2256_CR32) 2023; 58 2256_CR18 TA LaVeist (2256_CR36) 2014; 129 S Nundy (2256_CR5) 2022; 327 IL Piña (2256_CR7) 2015; 105 RI Boothroyd (2256_CR26) 2017; 7 A Windle (2256_CR27) 2023; 22 |
References_xml | – volume: 20 start-page: 249 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 2256_CR19 publication-title: JBI Evid Synth doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00001 – volume: 17 start-page: 75 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 2256_CR13 publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0 – volume: 19 start-page: 162 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 2256_CR28 publication-title: Int J Equity Health doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01276-3 – volume: 34 start-page: e71 issue: 6 year: 2019 ident: 2256_CR22 publication-title: Health Promot Int doi: 10.1093/heapro/day047 – volume: 16 start-page: 28 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 2256_CR29 publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01097-0 – volume: 7 start-page: A118 issue: 6 year: 2010 ident: 2256_CR23 publication-title: Prev Chronic Dis – ident: 2256_CR39 – volume: 129 start-page: 9 issue: Suppl 2 year: 2014 ident: 2256_CR36 publication-title: Public Health Rep doi: 10.1177/00333549141291S204 – ident: 2256_CR16 – volume: 105 start-page: 670 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 2256_CR7 publication-title: Am J Public Health doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301926 – volume: 7 start-page: 467 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 2256_CR26 publication-title: Transl Behav Med doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0503-3 – volume: 22 start-page: 1 year: 2023 ident: 2256_CR27 publication-title: Int J Equity Health doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02053-8 – volume: 98 start-page: 4 year: 2021 ident: 2256_CR31 publication-title: J Urb Health doi: 10.1007/s11524-021-00556-9 – volume: 15 start-page: 129 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 2256_CR33 publication-title: Int J Equity Health doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0419-4 – volume: 2015 start-page: CD009905 issue: 6 year: 2015 ident: 2256_CR25 publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 5 start-page: e10279 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 2256_CR37 publication-title: Learn Health Syst doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10279 – volume: 11 start-page: 72 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 2256_CR14 publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z – volume: 19 start-page: 192 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 2256_CR8 publication-title: Int J Equity Health doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01299-w – ident: 2256_CR6 – ident: 2256_CR4 – ident: 2256_CR2 – ident: 2256_CR18 doi: 10.3138/9781487515928 – ident: 2256_CR30 – volume: 112 start-page: 247 issue: 3 year: 2020 ident: 2256_CR10 publication-title: J Natl Med Assoc – volume: 62 start-page: 107 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: 2256_CR20 publication-title: J Adv Nurs doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x – volume: 327 start-page: 521 issue: 6 year: 2022 ident: 2256_CR5 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.25181 – volume: 58 start-page: 289 issue: Suppl 3 year: 2023 ident: 2256_CR32 publication-title: Health Serv Res doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14192 – volume: 44 start-page: 545 issue: 9 year: 2018 ident: 2256_CR34 publication-title: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf – volume: 1 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: 2256_CR12 publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1 – ident: 2256_CR15 – volume: 4 start-page: 490 issue: 5 year: 2017 ident: 2256_CR38 publication-title: AIMS Public Health doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.5.490 – ident: 2256_CR3 – ident: 2256_CR17 – ident: 2256_CR21 – ident: 2256_CR11 doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00051 – volume: 112 start-page: 1059 issue: 6 year: 2021 ident: 2256_CR24 publication-title: Can J Public Health doi: 10.17269/s41997-021-00534-3 – ident: 2256_CR9 – volume: 97 start-page: 1746 issue: 12 year: 2022 ident: 2256_CR35 publication-title: Acad Med doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004851 – ident: 2256_CR1 |
SSID | ssj0017867 |
Score | 2.3580697 |
Snippet | Background
Achieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured... Achieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured within health... Background Achieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured... BackgroundAchieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured... Abstract Background Achieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 171 |
SubjectTerms | Attitude of Health personnel Barriers Data collection Delivery of Health Care Demographic aspects Economic aspects Equality and Human Rights Female Global health Health care disparities Health care policy Health care reform Health disparities Health Equity Health Policy Health priorities Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Health services Health Services Research Humans Integration Interviews Interviews as Topic Jurisdiction Leadership Legislation Male Marginalized groups Medical care Medical personnel Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nova Scotia Partnerships Population studies Public Health Qualitative analysis Qualitative Research Quality management Sampling Social aspects Social Justice Social Policy |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Ni9UwEA-yJ0HEb6urRBE8aNmmSTqpt1VcVsE9uC7sLaT5cAVpn_Y9wbt_uJOkfbtdES8eCqWZlnZmMh_NzC-EPLMe0PDXXakaCaUIoirbJlSl8sA6dCAKXFzR_XDUHJ6I96fy9MJWX7EmLMMDZ8btpYBbONZ53whleesC82Aci9DhTPpofau2mpOpaf0AVANzi4xq9sbo1doS_REe6ORLWLihhNb_p02-4JQuF0xeWjVNzujgBrk-RZF0P7_9TXLF97fItfwLjubOotvk17a-juZuR-q_bTDopjNEBIqEps2G5vExGw5qeked_xpLNn7SjPU84l30aPhh6LEd0Cq8oqvzNs2RDmH7jEROV8jZHinukJODt5_eHJbTpgullS1fl9YLawPrau5AOqGCASlNyyUzIDD2Qq_nvXQuODDgQ5C-MbI1TgDnplOK3yU7_dD7-4QGE3ePARnqjolQOxVz8VB7i6dguSnIi1kGepWxNXTKSVSjs8Q0SkwniWkoyOsopi1lxMVOF1Bb9KQt-l_aUpCnUcg6Il_0sbTms9mMo353_FHvK4xGQVRKFOT5RBQGFLc1U6cCflUEy1pQ7i4ocWra5fCsS3oyDaPGeDqGnbJVBXmyHY53xnK33g8bpKkwzcPIWrGC3Muqt_1u3jIFmBcVRC2UcsGY5Uj_5SwBhzPGhcSEuCAvZ_09f6-_c_7B_-D8Q3K1TvMPDXOzS3bW3zf-EcZz6-5xmrq_Ad58R54 priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Central Database Suite (ProQuest) dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9RAEB_q9UUQ8dtolVUEHzT0NtnNbgSRVlqq4CGthb4tm_2ogiTX5k7w3T_c2c3HmYo-BEJ2ErKZ2fnIzvwG4IVxAhV_VqWy4CJlns3TsvDzVDpBKzQgUtiwo_tpURydso9n_GwLFkMtTEirHHRiVNS2MeEf-S66IcFa81K-W16koWtU2F0dWmjovrWCfRshxq7BNqpkPp_B9v7B4vPxuK8gZCGG0hlZ7LbB2pUp2ik80PinYmKeIor_37r6D2N1NZHyym5qNFKHt-Bm712SvU4cbsOWq-_Aje7XHOkqju7CrzHvjnRVkMRdrNEZJwN0BLKKxCZEw3jbKRSia0us-x5SOX6SDgO6xbvIovmhyYlpUFu8IctN-WZLGj8-I5KTJYpqjRT34PTw4Mv7o7RvxpAaXuar1DhmjKdVllvBLZNeC851mXOqBUOfDK2hc9xab4UWznvuCs1LbZnIc11Jmd-HWd3U7iEQr0NXGcF9VlHmMytDjO4zZ_BUmFwn8GrggVp2mBsqxiqyUB3HFHJMRY4pkcB-YNNIGfCy44Xm8lz1y0_FsI1ZWjlXMGny0nrqhLY0ANBT7hJ4HpisAiJGHVJuzvW6bdWHk2O1J9FLFWwuWQIveyLfILuN7isYcFYBRGtCuTOhxCVrpsODLKleZbRqI-AJPBuHw50hDa52zRpp5hj-occtaQIPOtEb552XVAqMlxKQE6GcfJjpSP3tawQUpzRnHAPlBF4P8rt5r39_-Uf_n8ZjuJ7FlYWquNiB2epy7Z6gB7eqnvbL8jeWGEXV priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1ba9VAEB60gghFtF4arbKK4IMGzyZ7i2_1YKlC-2At9G3Z7EUFSY7mHMF3f7izm0ubqg8-BEJ2NiSZ2blkZr4FeGa9RMVf1LkSXOYssEVeibDIlZe0RgOipIsZ3aNjcXjK3p_xswEmJ_bCXMzfUyVeddEeVTlaEjzQPOfyKlzjqHijNC_FcsoYSCXk2BTz13kzw5Pw-f_UwhfM0OUSyUt50mR-Dm7BzcFvJPs9o2_DFd_swPWjITO-A9v9_zfStxXdgV9TcR3pWx2J_7ZBj5uM-BDID5J2GhrHu15rENM44vzXWK_xk_RAzx3OIsftD0NObIsq4TVZnfdodqQN0z0SOVmhPDZIcRdOD95-XB7mw44LueVVuc6tZ9YGWhelk9wxFYzk3FQlp0YydLzQ5HnPnQtOGulD4F4YXhnHZFmaWqnyHmw1beN3gQQTt46RPBQ1ZaFwKgbiofAWT6UtTQYvRnboVQ-soVNAooTumaeReToxT8sM3kSOTZQRFDtdQFnRwxrTKTZjjtbeC6ZsWblAvTSORpR5yn0GTyO_dYS9aGJdzSez6Tr97uSD3lfoikq2UCyD5wNRaJHz1gxtCvhWESlrRrk3o8R1aefDo1jpQS90Gp3p6HPySmXwZBqOM2OtW-PbDdIsMMZDt1rRDO73Uji9d1lRJTEoykDN5HP2YeYjzZfPCTWc0pJxjIYzeDmK8vlz_fvLP_g_8odwo0iLDvWv2IOt9feNf4Ru27p-nNbrb4tTO24 priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | Exploring health equity integration among health service and delivery systems in Nova Scotia: perspectives of health system partners |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-024-02256-7 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39187882 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3102505598 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3097493281 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11345956 https://doaj.org/article/626054d1bee648c39df1e7ad1298915e |
Volume | 23 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjR1Zi9QwOOzxIoh4W12HKIIPWnfSJk0qiMwOu6wDDrLjwLyFtElWYWlnpzPivvvD_ZIeY9cVfOhB87W0-e7mOxB6lRsOgj_KQpEwHlJLh2Ga2GEoDCcZKBDBtVvR_TxNTud0smCLHdS2O2omsLrRtXP9pOari3c_L68-AsN_8AwvksPK6aw0BG0DG6jwkO-ifb9e5EL56HZVgQvfUZZQzsI04kmbRHPjM3qKytfz_1tq_6G2rodUXltX9erq5C6609iZeFQTxj20Y4r76Hb9kw7XuUcP0K8uAg_X-ZDYXG7ALMdtEQlAGvbtiNrxqhYtWBUaa3PhgjqucF0NuoK78LT8ofAsL0FuvMfLbSJnhUvbPcOD4yUQbQEQD9H85Pjr-DRs2jKEOUvjdZgbmueWZFGsOdNUWMUZU2nMiOIUrDPQi8Ywra3mihtrmUkUS5WmPI5VJkT8CO0VZWGeIGyV6y_DmY0yQm2khfPWbWRyOOV5rAL0psWBXNbVN6T3WkQia4xJwJj0GJM8QEcOTR2kq5ztL5Src9kwovQOHNUkMyahIo9TbYnhShNXip4wE6CXDsnS1cYoXPDNudpUlfw0O5MjAfYqp0NBA_S6AbIloDtXTS4DfJUrp9WDPOhBAvPm_eGWlmRL-xIsbmeYslQE6EU37O50AXGFKTcAMwRHEGxvQQL0uCa97rvjlAgOnlOARI8oexPTHym-f_OlxQmJKQOXOUBvW_rdvte_Z_7p_0zaM3Qr8vwFojk5QHvr1cY8B4tunQ3QLl9w2IsxGaD90Wgym8Dx6Hj65QyujpPxwP8rGXh2_g1aQ00Z |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3JbtQw1CrTA0gIsRMoYBCIA0QdJ3bsIFWohVYztB2hLlJvxvFSkFAybWZAvfNdfBvPTjIlRXDrIVIUv0Sx326_BaEX2nIQ_EkRi4zxmDo6jPPMDWNhOSlAgQhu_Inu7iQbHdKPR-xoCf3qcmF8WGUnE4OgNpX2e-SrYIZ4bc1y8W56EvuuUf50tWuhodrWCmYtlBhrEzu27dkPcOHqtfEHwPfLJNnaPHg_itsuA7FmeTqLtaVaO1IkqeHMUOEUZ0zlKSOKUzA2QMxby4xxhitunWM2UyxXhvI0VYUQKXz3ClqmfgNlgJY3Nief9hbnGFxkvEvVEdlq7bVrHoNehAuMjZj31GHoGvC3bvhDOV4M3LxwehuU4tZNdKO1ZvF6Q3630JItb6PrzVYgbjKc7qCfizg_3GRdYnsyB-Mfd6UqgDRwaHrUjdeNAMOqNNjYbz505Aw3NadreAtPqu8K7-sKpNNbPD1PF61x5RbfCOB4CqxRAsRddHgpaLmHBmVV2gcIO-W72HDmkoJQlxjh9wRcYjXccp2qCL3ucCCnTY0PGXwjkckGYxIwJgPGJI_QhkfTAtLX5w4PqtNj2bK7DG4iNaSwNqNCp7lxxHJliC94T5iN0HOPZOkrcJQ-xOdYzetajvf35LoAq5jToaARetUCuQrQrVWbMQGz8kW7epArPUgQEbo_3NGSbEVULc8ZKkLPFsP-TR92V9pqDjBDcDfBwhckQvcb0lvMO82J4OCfRUj0iLK3MP2R8uuXUMCckJQycMwj9Kaj3_P_-vfKP_z_NJ6iq6OD3R25M55sP0LXksBloAayFTSYnc7tY7AeZ8WTlkUx-nzZUuE3J6uEJg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3Nb9MwFLdgkyYkhGDACAwwCIkDRKsTO3a4lY9pK6xClEm7WY4_BhJKytIicecP59lOsmXAgUOlqH6Omrzvvvd-RuiZthwMf1alomA8pY5O0rJwk1RYTipwIIIbX9E9mhcHx3R2wk4uTPGHbve-JBlnGjxKU73aWxoXVVwUe633UmUK_gU-4LRTfhVtClaWkH5tTqezxWyoJHBR8H5Y5q87Rw4p4Pb_aZ0vuKfLrZOX6qfBLe3fRDe6eBJPowDcQldsvY22jrqK-Ta6Hv-Xw3Hc6Db6NTTd4TgCie33NUTiuMeNAD7hcAJRv95Ga4JVbbCx33wfx08cAaBb2IXnzQ-FF7oBU_EKL89nN1vcuOEegRwvQU5roLiDjvfffX5zkHYnMaSalfkq1ZZq7UiV5YYzQ4VTnDFV5owoTiEgA1doLTPGGa64dY7ZQrFSGcrzXFVC5HfRRt3U9h7CTvkjZThzWUWoy4zwCbrLrIZLrnOVoBc9O-QyAm7IkKiIQkbmSWCeDMyTPEGvPccGSg-WHb5ozk5lp3sy5GzUkMraggqdl8YRy5UhHn2eMJugp57f0sNh1L7f5lSt21YeLj7JqYAQldOJoAl63hG5BjivVTe-AE_lEbRGlLsjStBXPV7uxUp29qKVEGT7WJSVIkFPhmW_0_fA1bZZA80Ecj8ItwVJ0E6UwuG585IIDslSgsRIPkcvZrxSf_0S0MQJySmDLDlBL3tRPv9d_37z9_-P_DHa-vh2X344nL9_gK5lQf_ARBe7aGN1trYPIbJbVY865f0NiW1IGw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring+health+equity+integration+among+health+service+and+delivery+systems+in+Nova+Scotia%3A+perspectives+of+health+system+partners&rft.jtitle=International+journal+for+equity+in+health&rft.au=Yusuf%2C+Joshua&rft.au=D%27Souza%2C+Ninoshka+J&rft.au=A.T.+Caldwell%2C+Hilary&rft.au=Meaghan+Sim%2C+Sarah&rft.date=2024-08-26&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1475-9276&rft.eissn=1475-9276&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12939-024-02256-7&rft.externalDBID=ISR&rft.externalDocID=A808374084 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1475-9276&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1475-9276&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1475-9276&client=summon |