Improved accuracy of myocardial perfusion SPECT for detection of coronary artery disease by machine learning in a large population
We aimed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) by integrating clinical data and quantitative image features with machine learning (ML) algorithms. 1,181 rest 201Tl/stress 99mTc-sestamibi dual-isotope MPS studies [713 consecutive cases with correlating invasive corona...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of nuclear cardiology Vol. 20; no. 4; pp. 553 - 562 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Boston
Elsevier Inc
01.08.2013
Springer US Springer Nature B.V |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1071-3581 1532-6551 1532-6551 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12350-013-9706-2 |
Cover
| Summary: | We aimed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) by integrating clinical data and quantitative image features with machine learning (ML) algorithms.
1,181 rest 201Tl/stress 99mTc-sestamibi dual-isotope MPS studies [713 consecutive cases with correlating invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) and 468 with low likelihood (LLk) of CAD <5%] were considered. Cases with stenosis <70% by ICA and LLk of CAD were considered normal. Total stress perfusion deficit (TPD) for supine/prone data, stress/rest perfusion change, and transient ischemic dilatation were derived by automated perfusion quantification software and were combined with age, sex, and post-electrocardiogram CAD probability by a boosted ensemble ML algorithm (LogitBoost). The diagnostic accuracy of the model for prediction of obstructive CAD ≥70% was compared to standard prone/supine quantification and to visual analysis by two experienced readers utilizing all imaging, quantitative, and clinical data. Tenfold stratified cross-validation was performed.
The diagnostic accuracy of ML (87.3% ± 2.1%) was similar to Expert 1 (86.0% ± 2.1%), but superior to combined supine/prone TPD (82.8% ± 2.2%) and Expert 2 (82.1% ± 2.2%) (P < .01). The receiver operator characteristic areas under curve for ML algorithm (0.94 ± 0.01) were higher than those for TPD and both visual readers (P < .001). The sensitivity of ML algorithm (78.9% ± 4.2%) was similar to TPD (75.6% ± 4.4%) and Expert 1 (76.3% ± 4.3%), but higher than that of Expert 2 (71.1% ± 4.6%), (P < .01). The specificity of ML algorithm (92.1% ± 2.2%) was similar to Expert 1 (91.4% ± 2.2%) and Expert 2 (88.3% ± 2.5%), but higher than TPD (86.8% ± 2.6%), (P < .01).
ML significantly improves diagnostic performance of MPS by computational integration of quantitative perfusion and clinical data to the level rivaling expert analysis. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 1071-3581 1532-6551 1532-6551 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s12350-013-9706-2 |