Striking individual differences in color perception uncovered by ‘the dress’ photograph
‘The dress’ is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress’ pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants [1], but popular accounts (#TheDress) suggest the dress appears either white/gold or blue/black [2]. Could the purported categorical perception arise because the origi...
Saved in:
Published in | Current biology Vol. 25; no. 13; pp. R545 - R546 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
29.06.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0960-9822 1879-0445 1879-0445 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053 |
Cover
Abstract | ‘The dress’ is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress’ pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants [1], but popular accounts (#TheDress) suggest the dress appears either white/gold or blue/black [2]. Could the purported categorical perception arise because the original social-media question was an alternative-forced-choice? In a free-response survey (N = 1401), we found that most people, including those naïve to the image, reported white/gold or blue/black, but some said blue/brown. Reports of white/gold over blue/black were higher among older people and women. On re-test, some subjects reported a switch in perception, showing the image can be multistable. In a language-independent measure of perception, we asked subjects to identify the dress’ colors from a complete color gamut. The results showed three peaks corresponding to the main descriptive categories, providing additional evidence that the brain resolves the image into one of three stable percepts. We hypothesize that these reflect different internal priors: some people favor a cool illuminant (blue sky), discount shorter wavelengths, and perceive white/gold; others favor a warm illuminant (incandescent light), discount longer wavelengths, and see blue/black. The remaining subjects may assume a neutral illuminant, and see blue/brown. We show that by introducing overt cues to the illumination, we can flip the dress color.
Lafer-Sousa et al. document striking individual differences in color perception of The Dress photograph in over 1400 subjects, and provide insight into the underlying perceptual mechanisms. In particular, both descriptive reports and color-matching data support the idea that the brain resolves the colors of the dress into one of three stable percepts. |
---|---|
AbstractList | 'The dress' is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress' pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants, but popular accounts (#TheDress) suggest the dress appears either white/gold or blue/black. Could the purported categorical perception arise because the original social-media question was an alternative-forced-choice? In a free-response survey (N = 1401), we found that most people, including those naïve to the image, reported white/gold or blue/black, but some said blue/brown. Reports of white/gold over blue/black were higher among older people and women. On re-test, some subjects reported a switch in perception, showing the image can be multistable. In a language-independent measure of perception, we asked subjects to identify the dress' colors from a complete color gamut. The results showed three peaks corresponding to the main descriptive categories, providing additional evidence that the brain resolves the image into one of three stable percepts. We hypothesize that these reflect different internal priors: some people favor a cool illuminant (blue sky), discount shorter wavelengths, and perceive white/gold; others favor a warm illuminant (incandescent light), discount longer wavelengths, and see blue/black. The remaining subjects may assume a neutral illuminant, and see blue/brown. We show that by introducing overt cues to the illumination, we can flip the dress color. ‘The dress’ is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress’ pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants [1], but popular accounts (#TheDress) suggest the dress appears either white/gold or blue/black [2]. Could the purported categorical perception arise because the original social-media question was an alternative-forced-choice? In a free-response survey (N = 1401), we found that most people, including those naïve to the image, reported white/gold or blue/black, but some said blue/brown. Reports of white/gold over blue/black were higher among older people and women. On re-test, some subjects reported a switch in perception, showing the image can be multistable. In a language-independent measure of perception, we asked subjects to identify the dress’ colors from a complete color gamut. The results showed three peaks corresponding to the main descriptive categories, providing additional evidence that the brain resolves the image into one of three stable percepts. We hypothesize that these reflect different internal priors: some people favor a cool illuminant (blue sky), discount shorter wavelengths, and perceive white/gold; others favor a warm illuminant (incandescent light), discount longer wavelengths, and see blue/black. The remaining subjects may assume a neutral illuminant, and see blue/brown. We show that by introducing overt cues to the illumination, we can flip the dress color. Lafer-Sousa et al. document striking individual differences in color perception of The Dress photograph in over 1400 subjects, and provide insight into the underlying perceptual mechanisms. In particular, both descriptive reports and color-matching data support the idea that the brain resolves the colors of the dress into one of three stable percepts. 'The dress' is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress' pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants, but popular accounts (#TheDress) suggest the dress appears either white/gold or blue/black. Could the purported categorical perception arise because the original social-media question was an alternative-forced-choice? In a free-response survey (N = 1401), we found that most people, including those naïve to the image, reported white/gold or blue/black, but some said blue/brown. Reports of white/gold over blue/black were higher among older people and women. On re-test, some subjects reported a switch in perception, showing the image can be multistable. In a language-independent measure of perception, we asked subjects to identify the dress' colors from a complete color gamut. The results showed three peaks corresponding to the main descriptive categories, providing additional evidence that the brain resolves the image into one of three stable percepts. We hypothesize that these reflect different internal priors: some people favor a cool illuminant (blue sky), discount shorter wavelengths, and perceive white/gold; others favor a warm illuminant (incandescent light), discount longer wavelengths, and see blue/black. The remaining subjects may assume a neutral illuminant, and see blue/brown. We show that by introducing overt cues to the illumination, we can flip the dress color.'The dress' is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress' pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants, but popular accounts (#TheDress) suggest the dress appears either white/gold or blue/black. Could the purported categorical perception arise because the original social-media question was an alternative-forced-choice? In a free-response survey (N = 1401), we found that most people, including those naïve to the image, reported white/gold or blue/black, but some said blue/brown. Reports of white/gold over blue/black were higher among older people and women. On re-test, some subjects reported a switch in perception, showing the image can be multistable. In a language-independent measure of perception, we asked subjects to identify the dress' colors from a complete color gamut. The results showed three peaks corresponding to the main descriptive categories, providing additional evidence that the brain resolves the image into one of three stable percepts. We hypothesize that these reflect different internal priors: some people favor a cool illuminant (blue sky), discount shorter wavelengths, and perceive white/gold; others favor a warm illuminant (incandescent light), discount longer wavelengths, and see blue/black. The remaining subjects may assume a neutral illuminant, and see blue/brown. We show that by introducing overt cues to the illumination, we can flip the dress color. |
Author | Hermann, Katherine L. Conway, Bevil R. Lafer-Sousa, Rosa |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Rosa surname: Lafer-Sousa fullname: Lafer-Sousa, Rosa – sequence: 2 givenname: Katherine L. surname: Hermann fullname: Hermann, Katherine L. – sequence: 3 givenname: Bevil R. surname: Conway fullname: Conway, Bevil R. email: bevil@mit.edu |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25981795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kctu1DAUhi1URKeFB2CDsmST4OM4iS0kJFSVi1SJBbBiYTn2yYyHjB3sZKTu-hjwen0SPJoWAYuuLB3_F-n_zsiJDx4JeQ60Agrtq21llr5iFJqK8oo29SOyAtHJknLenJAVlS0tpWDslJyltKUUmJDtE3LKGimgk82KfPs8R_fd-XXhvHV7Zxc9FtYNA0b0BlM-FyaMIRYTRoPT7IIvFm_CPgts0V8Xtzc_5w0WNmJKtze_imkT5rCOeto8JY8HPSZ8dveek6_vLr9cfCivPr3_ePH2qjSN6OayBehNy6Fhpu0tBcM0p23Nas0E6oF3EhsxdJKDMR2TfScFSuRmQCMQOa3PyZtj7rT0O7QG_Rz1qKbodjpeq6Cd-vfHu41ah73ikgHINge8vAuI4ceCaVY7lwyOo_YYlqSglTUIDpRl6Yu_u_6U3C-aBd1RYGJIKeKgjJv1YbZc7UYFVB3Yqa3K7NSBnaJcZXbZCf8578Mf8rw-ejDvu3cYVTLuAM66iGZWNrgH3L8B7mK1vg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_5594_JMI_2016_2643964 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobeha_2019_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1177_2041669518764192 crossref_primary_10_3389_frobt_2019_00154 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2020_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_21_8_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_018_1097_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobeha_2019_05_002 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2023_1332 crossref_primary_10_1523_ENEURO_0039_16_2016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_msard_2016_03_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_cdev_13603 crossref_primary_10_1039_D2NH00232A crossref_primary_10_1093_jrsssc_qlad063 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_171290 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_exer_2020_108186 crossref_primary_10_1177_2041669519856037 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_22_2_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2015_05_020 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_020_19160_7 crossref_primary_10_1177_20416695211055767 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2020_10_062 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1905334117 crossref_primary_10_1080_13506285_2023_2192993 crossref_primary_10_1080_15230406_2016_1140074 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_019_01247_6 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_control_062323_102456 crossref_primary_10_1177_0301006621991320 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0161090 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0165095 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2020_00364 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_24_2_12 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2017_07_015 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_022_28249_0 crossref_primary_10_1177_0301006621997341 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2020_01_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_matdes_2022_111244 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pcbi_1010648 crossref_primary_10_1177_0301006620963808 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_20_3_7 crossref_primary_10_1364_JOSAA_381311 crossref_primary_10_1177_2041669517739635 crossref_primary_10_3390_heritage7010023 crossref_primary_10_1111_cgf_13149 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2022_08_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2019_04_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2019_102762 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2001946117 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10816_019_09426_w crossref_primary_10_1080_02643294_2022_2073808 crossref_primary_10_1167_18_13_18 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsfs_2018_0012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jecp_2019_03_010 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2016_01808 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_8339 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03545377 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobeha_2019_10_004 crossref_primary_10_1177_2041669518761731 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2020_10_007 crossref_primary_10_1109_TVCG_2024_3372075 crossref_primary_10_1177_2041669516645592 crossref_primary_10_1364_JOSAA_33_00A137 crossref_primary_10_1177_0301006616643664 crossref_primary_10_1364_JOSAA_35_00B347 crossref_primary_10_1177_14614448241235192 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_vision_091517_034231 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftale_2018_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_24_8_11 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2016_00263 crossref_primary_10_3390_languages5030029 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftal_2017_11_009 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_021_01749_x crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_3164_15_2016 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_vision_093020_112820 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2017_04_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2015_08_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuron_2022_01_024 crossref_primary_10_2478_amns_2023_1_00254 crossref_primary_10_1111_tran_12326 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2024_108406 crossref_primary_10_1002_col_22944 |
Cites_doi | 10.1038/47245 10.1167/6.11.10 10.3109/07420528.2012.719971 10.1364/JOSAA.29.000657 10.1017/S0952523813000382 10.1167/10.13.17 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 Elsevier Ltd Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 Elsevier Ltd – notice: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053 |
DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology |
EISSN | 1879-0445 |
EndPage | R546 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC4921196 25981795 10_1016_j_cub_2015_04_053 S0960982215005357 |
Genre | Letter Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: R01 EY023322 |
GroupedDBID | --- --K -DZ -~X 0R~ 1RT 1~5 2WC 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 62- 6I. 6J9 7-5 AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFTH AAFWJ AAIAV AAKRW AALRI AAUCE AAVLU AAXJY AAXUO ABJNI ABMAC ABMWF ABVKL ACGFO ACGFS ADBBV ADEZE ADJPV AEFWE AENEX AEXQZ AFTJW AGHFR AGHSJ AGKMS AGUBO AHHHB AITUG ALKID ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ AZFZN BAWUL CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD F5P FCP FDB FIRID IHE IXB J1W JIG LX5 M3Z M41 NCXOZ O-L O9- OK1 P2P RCE RIG ROL RPZ SCP SDG SES SSZ TR2 WQ6 ZA5 29F 5VS AAIKJ AAMRU AAQFI AAQXK AAYWO AAYXX ABDGV ABWVN ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADMUD ADNMO ADVLN AEUPX AFPUW AGCQF AGQPQ AIGII AKAPO AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP APXCP ASPBG AVWKF CAG CITATION COF FEDTE FGOYB G-2 HVGLF HZ~ OZT R2- SEW UHS XIH XPP Y6R ZGI CGR CUY CVF ECM EFKBS EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-611bc64152c6bd01c2a406323a28eaf479e58f7941cc729b798e9e4cfec8ee403 |
IEDL.DBID | IXB |
ISSN | 0960-9822 1879-0445 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:12:36 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 07:36:14 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:39:55 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:23 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:08:04 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:22:48 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 13 |
Language | English |
License | http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c587t-611bc64152c6bd01c2a406323a28eaf479e58f7941cc729b798e9e4cfec8ee403 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Correspondence-1 content type line 23 contributed equally |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982215005357 |
PMID | 25981795 |
PQID | 1693184102 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4921196 proquest_miscellaneous_1693184102 pubmed_primary_25981795 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_cub_2015_04_053 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2015_04_053 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_cub_2015_04_053 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015-06-29 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-06-29 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2015 text: 2015-06-29 day: 29 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Current biology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Curr Biol |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd |
References | Witzel, Valkova, Hansen, Gegenfurtner (bib4) 2011; 2 Lafer-Sousa, Liu, Lafer-Sousa, Wiest, Conway (bib7) 2012; 29 Conway (bib8) 2014; 31 Adan, Archer, Hidalgo, Di Milia, Natale, Randler (bib10) 2012; 29 Brainard, Longere, Delahunt, Freeman, Kraft, Xiao (bib6) 2006; 6 McDermott, Malkoc, Mulligan, Webster (bib9) 2010; 10 Zaidi (bib3) 2011; Volume 2 Conway, B.R. (2015). Why do we care about the colour of the dress? The Guardian . Bloj, Kersten, Hurlbert (bib5) 1999; 402 Rogers, A. (2015). The science of why no one agrees on the color of this dress. Wired 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib1 Conway (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib8) 2014; 31 Zaidi (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib3) 2011; Volume 2 Lafer-Sousa (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib7) 2012; 29 Adan (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib10) 2012; 29 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib2 Bloj (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib5) 1999; 402 Witzel (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib4) 2011; 2 Brainard (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib6) 2006; 6 McDermott (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib9) 2010; 10 23145224 - Iperception. 2011;2(1):13-49 23004349 - Chronobiol Int. 2012 Nov;29(9):1153-75 10622251 - Nature. 1999 Dec 23-30;402(6764):877-9 23833699 - Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;2(6):686-700 17209734 - J Vis. 2006 Nov 06;6(11):1267-81 24103417 - Vis Neurosci. 2014 Mar;31(2):197-209 22561924 - J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2012 May 1;29(5):657-70 |
References_xml | – volume: 29 start-page: 657 year: 2012 end-page: 670 ident: bib7 article-title: Color tuning in alert macaque V1 assessed with fMRI and single-unit recording shows a bias toward daylight colors publication-title: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. – volume: 2 start-page: 13 year: 2011 end-page: 49 ident: bib4 article-title: Object knowledge modulates colour appearance publication-title: iperception – volume: Volume 2 year: 2011 ident: bib3 publication-title: Visual inferences of material changes: color as clue and distraction – volume: 402 start-page: 877 year: 1999 end-page: 879 ident: bib5 article-title: Perception of three-dimensional shape influences colour perception through mutual illumination publication-title: Nature – reference: Conway, B.R. (2015). Why do we care about the colour of the dress? The Guardian – volume: 29 start-page: 1153 year: 2012 end-page: 1175 ident: bib10 article-title: Circadian typology: a comprehensive review publication-title: Chronobiol. Int. – reference: . – reference: Rogers, A. (2015). The science of why no one agrees on the color of this dress. Wired – volume: 6 start-page: 1267 year: 2006 end-page: 1281 ident: bib6 article-title: Bayesian model of human color constancy publication-title: J. Vis. – volume: 10 start-page: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 32 ident: bib9 article-title: Adaptation and visual salience publication-title: J. Vis. – volume: 31 start-page: 197 year: 2014 end-page: 209 ident: bib8 article-title: Color signals through dorsal and ventral visual pathways publication-title: Vis. Neurosci. – volume: 402 start-page: 877 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib5 article-title: Perception of three-dimensional shape influences colour perception through mutual illumination publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/47245 – volume: Volume 2 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib3 – volume: 6 start-page: 1267 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib6 article-title: Bayesian model of human color constancy publication-title: J. Vis. doi: 10.1167/6.11.10 – volume: 29 start-page: 1153 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib10 article-title: Circadian typology: a comprehensive review publication-title: Chronobiol. Int. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.719971 – ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib2 – volume: 29 start-page: 657 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib7 article-title: Color tuning in alert macaque V1 assessed with fMRI and single-unit recording shows a bias toward daylight colors publication-title: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.29.000657 – volume: 31 start-page: 197 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib8 article-title: Color signals through dorsal and ventral visual pathways publication-title: Vis. Neurosci. doi: 10.1017/S0952523813000382 – ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib1 – volume: 2 start-page: 13 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib4 article-title: Object knowledge modulates colour appearance publication-title: iperception – volume: 10 start-page: 1 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib9 article-title: Adaptation and visual salience publication-title: J. Vis. doi: 10.1167/10.13.17 – reference: 10622251 - Nature. 1999 Dec 23-30;402(6764):877-9 – reference: 23004349 - Chronobiol Int. 2012 Nov;29(9):1153-75 – reference: 17209734 - J Vis. 2006 Nov 06;6(11):1267-81 – reference: 23833699 - Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;2(6):686-700 – reference: 22561924 - J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2012 May 1;29(5):657-70 – reference: 23145224 - Iperception. 2011;2(1):13-49 – reference: 24103417 - Vis Neurosci. 2014 Mar;31(2):197-209 |
SSID | ssj0012896 |
Score | 2.506014 |
Snippet | ‘The dress’ is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress’ pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants [1], but popular accounts... 'The dress' is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress' pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants, but popular accounts... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | R545 |
SubjectTerms | Age Factors Color Perception - physiology Cues Female Humans Individuality Internet Lighting - standards Male Photography - standards Recognition (Psychology) - physiology Sex Factors |
Title | Striking individual differences in color perception uncovered by ‘the dress’ photograph |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25981795 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1693184102 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4921196 |
Volume | 25 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB4hKiQuiEJpF1pkJE6VovUmTuIcKSpCRXDgoa7EwbIdWwRV2dU2e-DGz4C_xy9hJi-xReXAMc44smbsecQz3wDsJ154n0gbJFyngZDc4JnzMvB8JKnzNteGCpxPz5LjK_FrHI-X4LCrhaG0ylb3Nzq91tbtyLDl5nBaFMOLGiwN7Rt-kEBKqKKcqkqpiG_8o79JwICivq9E4oCou5vNOsfLzg1ld8U12mkc_c82vfY9_02hfGGTjtZhrXUm2UGz3o-w5MoNWGnaS95twvVFNSvoVzgr-rIr1nVEQf2Aw4xAq2ds2qe3MLRzlNXpcmbu2NP9AzqILKeY_On-kU1vJlWDcf0Jro5-Xh4eB20zhcDGMq0wRBwZm5C5tonJ-ciGGm15FEY6lE57kWYulh5P58hadLhNmkmXOWG9s9I5waMtWC4npfsCjGuHfpGIUpNZYZ3UXosMvxmmGc_zSA-Ad2xUtkUap4YXf1SXUnarkPOKOK-4UMj5AXzvp0wbmI23iEUnG7WwVxSagbem7XVyVHiG6GJEl24y_6sIkAYjXfS1BvC5kWu_CgwPJSqteADpgsR7AsLnXnxTFjc1TrfICD4v2X7fcndglZ4oLS3MvsJyNZu7b-gAVWYXPhycnP8-2a13-jOe2Ajr |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB4BVUUvFW15bEuLK_VUKVpv4iTOkSLQ0gIXQFqpB8t2bBGEsqtt9sCNn9H-PX4JM3mJpSqHXuOxZc3Y88iMvwH4knjhfSJtkHCdBkJyg3fOy8DzkaTO21wbeuB8epaML8X3STxZgYPuLQyVVba6v9HptbZuvwxbbg5nRTE8r8HS0L7hggRSkq7CC_QGEgLQP55861MJGFHUCUukDoi8S23WRV52Yai8K67hTuPoX8bpb-fzaQ3lI6N0tAGvW2-S7TcbfgMrrnwLL5v-krfv4Od5NS_oXzgr-ndXrGuJggoCPzNCrZ6zWV_fwtDQUVmny5m5Zfd3v9FDZDkF5fd3f9jsalo1INebcHl0eHEwDtpuCoGNZVphjDgyNiF7bROT85ENNRrzKIx0KJ32Is1cLD1ez5G16HGbNJMuc8J6Z6VzgkdbsFZOS7cDjGuHjpGIUpNZYZ3UXosM1wzTjOd5pAfAOzYq20KNU8eLG9XVlF0r5LwizisuFHJ-AF_7KbMGZ-M5YtHJRi0dFoV24Llpnzs5KrxElBnRpZsufilCpMFQF52tAWw3cu13gfGhRK0VDyBdknhPQADdyyNlcVUDdYuM8POS9_-33T1YH1-cnqiT47MfH-AVjVCNWpjtwlo1X7iP6A1V5lN92h8ApGUKbA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Striking+individual+differences+in+color+perception+uncovered+by+%27the+dress%27+photograph&rft.jtitle=Current+biology&rft.au=Lafer-Sousa%2C+Rosa&rft.au=Hermann%2C+Katherine+L&rft.au=Conway%2C+Bevil+R&rft.date=2015-06-29&rft.eissn=1879-0445&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=R545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.cub.2015.04.053&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F25981795&rft.externalDocID=25981795 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0960-9822&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0960-9822&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0960-9822&client=summon |