Striking individual differences in color perception uncovered by ‘the dress’ photograph

‘The dress’ is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress’ pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants [1], but popular accounts (#TheDress) suggest the dress appears either white/gold or blue/black [2]. Could the purported categorical perception arise because the origi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent biology Vol. 25; no. 13; pp. R545 - R546
Main Authors Lafer-Sousa, Rosa, Hermann, Katherine L., Conway, Bevil R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 29.06.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0960-9822
1879-0445
1879-0445
DOI10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053

Cover

Abstract ‘The dress’ is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress’ pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants [1], but popular accounts (#TheDress) suggest the dress appears either white/gold or blue/black [2]. Could the purported categorical perception arise because the original social-media question was an alternative-forced-choice? In a free-response survey (N = 1401), we found that most people, including those naïve to the image, reported white/gold or blue/black, but some said blue/brown. Reports of white/gold over blue/black were higher among older people and women. On re-test, some subjects reported a switch in perception, showing the image can be multistable. In a language-independent measure of perception, we asked subjects to identify the dress’ colors from a complete color gamut. The results showed three peaks corresponding to the main descriptive categories, providing additional evidence that the brain resolves the image into one of three stable percepts. We hypothesize that these reflect different internal priors: some people favor a cool illuminant (blue sky), discount shorter wavelengths, and perceive white/gold; others favor a warm illuminant (incandescent light), discount longer wavelengths, and see blue/black. The remaining subjects may assume a neutral illuminant, and see blue/brown. We show that by introducing overt cues to the illumination, we can flip the dress color. Lafer-Sousa et al. document striking individual differences in color perception of The Dress photograph in over 1400 subjects, and provide insight into the underlying perceptual mechanisms. In particular, both descriptive reports and color-matching data support the idea that the brain resolves the colors of the dress into one of three stable percepts.
AbstractList 'The dress' is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress' pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants, but popular accounts (#TheDress) suggest the dress appears either white/gold or blue/black. Could the purported categorical perception arise because the original social-media question was an alternative-forced-choice? In a free-response survey (N = 1401), we found that most people, including those naïve to the image, reported white/gold or blue/black, but some said blue/brown. Reports of white/gold over blue/black were higher among older people and women. On re-test, some subjects reported a switch in perception, showing the image can be multistable. In a language-independent measure of perception, we asked subjects to identify the dress' colors from a complete color gamut. The results showed three peaks corresponding to the main descriptive categories, providing additional evidence that the brain resolves the image into one of three stable percepts. We hypothesize that these reflect different internal priors: some people favor a cool illuminant (blue sky), discount shorter wavelengths, and perceive white/gold; others favor a warm illuminant (incandescent light), discount longer wavelengths, and see blue/black. The remaining subjects may assume a neutral illuminant, and see blue/brown. We show that by introducing overt cues to the illumination, we can flip the dress color.
‘The dress’ is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress’ pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants [1], but popular accounts (#TheDress) suggest the dress appears either white/gold or blue/black [2]. Could the purported categorical perception arise because the original social-media question was an alternative-forced-choice? In a free-response survey (N = 1401), we found that most people, including those naïve to the image, reported white/gold or blue/black, but some said blue/brown. Reports of white/gold over blue/black were higher among older people and women. On re-test, some subjects reported a switch in perception, showing the image can be multistable. In a language-independent measure of perception, we asked subjects to identify the dress’ colors from a complete color gamut. The results showed three peaks corresponding to the main descriptive categories, providing additional evidence that the brain resolves the image into one of three stable percepts. We hypothesize that these reflect different internal priors: some people favor a cool illuminant (blue sky), discount shorter wavelengths, and perceive white/gold; others favor a warm illuminant (incandescent light), discount longer wavelengths, and see blue/black. The remaining subjects may assume a neutral illuminant, and see blue/brown. We show that by introducing overt cues to the illumination, we can flip the dress color. Lafer-Sousa et al. document striking individual differences in color perception of The Dress photograph in over 1400 subjects, and provide insight into the underlying perceptual mechanisms. In particular, both descriptive reports and color-matching data support the idea that the brain resolves the colors of the dress into one of three stable percepts.
'The dress' is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress' pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants, but popular accounts (#TheDress) suggest the dress appears either white/gold or blue/black. Could the purported categorical perception arise because the original social-media question was an alternative-forced-choice? In a free-response survey (N = 1401), we found that most people, including those naïve to the image, reported white/gold or blue/black, but some said blue/brown. Reports of white/gold over blue/black were higher among older people and women. On re-test, some subjects reported a switch in perception, showing the image can be multistable. In a language-independent measure of perception, we asked subjects to identify the dress' colors from a complete color gamut. The results showed three peaks corresponding to the main descriptive categories, providing additional evidence that the brain resolves the image into one of three stable percepts. We hypothesize that these reflect different internal priors: some people favor a cool illuminant (blue sky), discount shorter wavelengths, and perceive white/gold; others favor a warm illuminant (incandescent light), discount longer wavelengths, and see blue/black. The remaining subjects may assume a neutral illuminant, and see blue/brown. We show that by introducing overt cues to the illumination, we can flip the dress color.'The dress' is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress' pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants, but popular accounts (#TheDress) suggest the dress appears either white/gold or blue/black. Could the purported categorical perception arise because the original social-media question was an alternative-forced-choice? In a free-response survey (N = 1401), we found that most people, including those naïve to the image, reported white/gold or blue/black, but some said blue/brown. Reports of white/gold over blue/black were higher among older people and women. On re-test, some subjects reported a switch in perception, showing the image can be multistable. In a language-independent measure of perception, we asked subjects to identify the dress' colors from a complete color gamut. The results showed three peaks corresponding to the main descriptive categories, providing additional evidence that the brain resolves the image into one of three stable percepts. We hypothesize that these reflect different internal priors: some people favor a cool illuminant (blue sky), discount shorter wavelengths, and perceive white/gold; others favor a warm illuminant (incandescent light), discount longer wavelengths, and see blue/black. The remaining subjects may assume a neutral illuminant, and see blue/brown. We show that by introducing overt cues to the illumination, we can flip the dress color.
Author Hermann, Katherine L.
Conway, Bevil R.
Lafer-Sousa, Rosa
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Rosa
  surname: Lafer-Sousa
  fullname: Lafer-Sousa, Rosa
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Katherine L.
  surname: Hermann
  fullname: Hermann, Katherine L.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Bevil R.
  surname: Conway
  fullname: Conway, Bevil R.
  email: bevil@mit.edu
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25981795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kctu1DAUhi1URKeFB2CDsmST4OM4iS0kJFSVi1SJBbBiYTn2yYyHjB3sZKTu-hjwen0SPJoWAYuuLB3_F-n_zsiJDx4JeQ60Agrtq21llr5iFJqK8oo29SOyAtHJknLenJAVlS0tpWDslJyltKUUmJDtE3LKGimgk82KfPs8R_fd-XXhvHV7Zxc9FtYNA0b0BlM-FyaMIRYTRoPT7IIvFm_CPgts0V8Xtzc_5w0WNmJKtze_imkT5rCOeto8JY8HPSZ8dveek6_vLr9cfCivPr3_ePH2qjSN6OayBehNy6Fhpu0tBcM0p23Nas0E6oF3EhsxdJKDMR2TfScFSuRmQCMQOa3PyZtj7rT0O7QG_Rz1qKbodjpeq6Cd-vfHu41ah73ikgHINge8vAuI4ceCaVY7lwyOo_YYlqSglTUIDpRl6Yu_u_6U3C-aBd1RYGJIKeKgjJv1YbZc7UYFVB3Yqa3K7NSBnaJcZXbZCf8578Mf8rw-ejDvu3cYVTLuAM66iGZWNrgH3L8B7mK1vg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_5594_JMI_2016_2643964
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobeha_2019_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1177_2041669518764192
crossref_primary_10_3389_frobt_2019_00154
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2020_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_21_8_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_018_1097_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobeha_2019_05_002
crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2023_1332
crossref_primary_10_1523_ENEURO_0039_16_2016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_msard_2016_03_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_cdev_13603
crossref_primary_10_1039_D2NH00232A
crossref_primary_10_1093_jrsssc_qlad063
crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_171290
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_exer_2020_108186
crossref_primary_10_1177_2041669519856037
crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_22_2_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2015_05_020
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_020_19160_7
crossref_primary_10_1177_20416695211055767
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2020_10_062
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1905334117
crossref_primary_10_1080_13506285_2023_2192993
crossref_primary_10_1080_15230406_2016_1140074
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_019_01247_6
crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_control_062323_102456
crossref_primary_10_1177_0301006621991320
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0161090
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0165095
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2020_00364
crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_24_2_12
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2017_07_015
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_022_28249_0
crossref_primary_10_1177_0301006621997341
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2020_01_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_matdes_2022_111244
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pcbi_1010648
crossref_primary_10_1177_0301006620963808
crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_20_3_7
crossref_primary_10_1364_JOSAA_381311
crossref_primary_10_1177_2041669517739635
crossref_primary_10_3390_heritage7010023
crossref_primary_10_1111_cgf_13149
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2022_08_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2019_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2019_102762
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2001946117
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10816_019_09426_w
crossref_primary_10_1080_02643294_2022_2073808
crossref_primary_10_1167_18_13_18
crossref_primary_10_1098_rsfs_2018_0012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jecp_2019_03_010
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2016_01808
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_8339
crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03545377
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobeha_2019_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1177_2041669518761731
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2020_10_007
crossref_primary_10_1109_TVCG_2024_3372075
crossref_primary_10_1177_2041669516645592
crossref_primary_10_1364_JOSAA_33_00A137
crossref_primary_10_1177_0301006616643664
crossref_primary_10_1364_JOSAA_35_00B347
crossref_primary_10_1177_14614448241235192
crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_vision_091517_034231
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftale_2018_02_003
crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_24_8_11
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2016_00263
crossref_primary_10_3390_languages5030029
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftal_2017_11_009
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_021_01749_x
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_3164_15_2016
crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_vision_093020_112820
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2017_04_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2015_08_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuron_2022_01_024
crossref_primary_10_2478_amns_2023_1_00254
crossref_primary_10_1111_tran_12326
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2024_108406
crossref_primary_10_1002_col_22944
Cites_doi 10.1038/47245
10.1167/6.11.10
10.3109/07420528.2012.719971
10.1364/JOSAA.29.000657
10.1017/S0952523813000382
10.1167/10.13.17
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 Elsevier Ltd
– notice: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
EISSN 1879-0445
EndPage R546
ExternalDocumentID PMC4921196
25981795
10_1016_j_cub_2015_04_053
S0960982215005357
Genre Letter
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 EY023322
GroupedDBID ---
--K
-DZ
-~X
0R~
1RT
1~5
2WC
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
62-
6I.
6J9
7-5
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFTH
AAFWJ
AAIAV
AAKRW
AALRI
AAUCE
AAVLU
AAXJY
AAXUO
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMWF
ABVKL
ACGFO
ACGFS
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADJPV
AEFWE
AENEX
AEXQZ
AFTJW
AGHFR
AGHSJ
AGKMS
AGUBO
AHHHB
AITUG
ALKID
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
AZFZN
BAWUL
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
FCP
FDB
FIRID
IHE
IXB
J1W
JIG
LX5
M3Z
M41
NCXOZ
O-L
O9-
OK1
P2P
RCE
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SCP
SDG
SES
SSZ
TR2
WQ6
ZA5
29F
5VS
AAIKJ
AAMRU
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABDGV
ABWVN
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEUPX
AFPUW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AIGII
AKAPO
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
CAG
CITATION
COF
FEDTE
FGOYB
G-2
HVGLF
HZ~
OZT
R2-
SEW
UHS
XIH
XPP
Y6R
ZGI
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EFKBS
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-611bc64152c6bd01c2a406323a28eaf479e58f7941cc729b798e9e4cfec8ee403
IEDL.DBID IXB
ISSN 0960-9822
1879-0445
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:12:36 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 07:36:14 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:39:55 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:23 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:08:04 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:22:48 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 13
Language English
License http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c587t-611bc64152c6bd01c2a406323a28eaf479e58f7941cc729b798e9e4cfec8ee403
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
content type line 23
contributed equally
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982215005357
PMID 25981795
PQID 1693184102
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4921196
proquest_miscellaneous_1693184102
pubmed_primary_25981795
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_cub_2015_04_053
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2015_04_053
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_cub_2015_04_053
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-06-29
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-06-29
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-06-29
  day: 29
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Current biology
PublicationTitleAlternate Curr Biol
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References Witzel, Valkova, Hansen, Gegenfurtner (bib4) 2011; 2
Lafer-Sousa, Liu, Lafer-Sousa, Wiest, Conway (bib7) 2012; 29
Conway (bib8) 2014; 31
Adan, Archer, Hidalgo, Di Milia, Natale, Randler (bib10) 2012; 29
Brainard, Longere, Delahunt, Freeman, Kraft, Xiao (bib6) 2006; 6
McDermott, Malkoc, Mulligan, Webster (bib9) 2010; 10
Zaidi (bib3) 2011; Volume 2
Conway, B.R. (2015). Why do we care about the colour of the dress? The Guardian
.
Bloj, Kersten, Hurlbert (bib5) 1999; 402
Rogers, A. (2015). The science of why no one agrees on the color of this dress. Wired
10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib1
Conway (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib8) 2014; 31
Zaidi (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib3) 2011; Volume 2
Lafer-Sousa (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib7) 2012; 29
Adan (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib10) 2012; 29
10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib2
Bloj (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib5) 1999; 402
Witzel (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib4) 2011; 2
Brainard (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib6) 2006; 6
McDermott (10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib9) 2010; 10
23145224 - Iperception. 2011;2(1):13-49
23004349 - Chronobiol Int. 2012 Nov;29(9):1153-75
10622251 - Nature. 1999 Dec 23-30;402(6764):877-9
23833699 - Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;2(6):686-700
17209734 - J Vis. 2006 Nov 06;6(11):1267-81
24103417 - Vis Neurosci. 2014 Mar;31(2):197-209
22561924 - J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2012 May 1;29(5):657-70
References_xml – volume: 29
  start-page: 657
  year: 2012
  end-page: 670
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Color tuning in alert macaque V1 assessed with fMRI and single-unit recording shows a bias toward daylight colors
  publication-title: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis.
– volume: 2
  start-page: 13
  year: 2011
  end-page: 49
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Object knowledge modulates colour appearance
  publication-title: iperception
– volume: Volume 2
  year: 2011
  ident: bib3
  publication-title: Visual inferences of material changes: color as clue and distraction
– volume: 402
  start-page: 877
  year: 1999
  end-page: 879
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Perception of three-dimensional shape influences colour perception through mutual illumination
  publication-title: Nature
– reference: Conway, B.R. (2015). Why do we care about the colour of the dress? The Guardian
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1153
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1175
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Circadian typology: a comprehensive review
  publication-title: Chronobiol. Int.
– reference: .
– reference: Rogers, A. (2015). The science of why no one agrees on the color of this dress. Wired
– volume: 6
  start-page: 1267
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1281
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Bayesian model of human color constancy
  publication-title: J. Vis.
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 32
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Adaptation and visual salience
  publication-title: J. Vis.
– volume: 31
  start-page: 197
  year: 2014
  end-page: 209
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Color signals through dorsal and ventral visual pathways
  publication-title: Vis. Neurosci.
– volume: 402
  start-page: 877
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib5
  article-title: Perception of three-dimensional shape influences colour perception through mutual illumination
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/47245
– volume: Volume 2
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib3
– volume: 6
  start-page: 1267
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib6
  article-title: Bayesian model of human color constancy
  publication-title: J. Vis.
  doi: 10.1167/6.11.10
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1153
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib10
  article-title: Circadian typology: a comprehensive review
  publication-title: Chronobiol. Int.
  doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.719971
– ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib2
– volume: 29
  start-page: 657
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib7
  article-title: Color tuning in alert macaque V1 assessed with fMRI and single-unit recording shows a bias toward daylight colors
  publication-title: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis.
  doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.29.000657
– volume: 31
  start-page: 197
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib8
  article-title: Color signals through dorsal and ventral visual pathways
  publication-title: Vis. Neurosci.
  doi: 10.1017/S0952523813000382
– ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib1
– volume: 2
  start-page: 13
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib4
  article-title: Object knowledge modulates colour appearance
  publication-title: iperception
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053_bib9
  article-title: Adaptation and visual salience
  publication-title: J. Vis.
  doi: 10.1167/10.13.17
– reference: 10622251 - Nature. 1999 Dec 23-30;402(6764):877-9
– reference: 23004349 - Chronobiol Int. 2012 Nov;29(9):1153-75
– reference: 17209734 - J Vis. 2006 Nov 06;6(11):1267-81
– reference: 23833699 - Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;2(6):686-700
– reference: 22561924 - J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2012 May 1;29(5):657-70
– reference: 23145224 - Iperception. 2011;2(1):13-49
– reference: 24103417 - Vis Neurosci. 2014 Mar;31(2):197-209
SSID ssj0012896
Score 2.506014
Snippet ‘The dress’ is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress’ pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants [1], but popular accounts...
'The dress' is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress' pixels are brown and blue, colors associated with natural illuminants, but popular accounts...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage R545
SubjectTerms Age Factors
Color Perception - physiology
Cues
Female
Humans
Individuality
Internet
Lighting - standards
Male
Photography - standards
Recognition (Psychology) - physiology
Sex Factors
Title Striking individual differences in color perception uncovered by ‘the dress’ photograph
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25981795
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1693184102
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4921196
Volume 25
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB4hKiQuiEJpF1pkJE6VovUmTuIcKSpCRXDgoa7EwbIdWwRV2dU2e-DGz4C_xy9hJi-xReXAMc44smbsecQz3wDsJ154n0gbJFyngZDc4JnzMvB8JKnzNteGCpxPz5LjK_FrHI-X4LCrhaG0ylb3Nzq91tbtyLDl5nBaFMOLGiwN7Rt-kEBKqKKcqkqpiG_8o79JwICivq9E4oCou5vNOsfLzg1ld8U12mkc_c82vfY9_02hfGGTjtZhrXUm2UGz3o-w5MoNWGnaS95twvVFNSvoVzgr-rIr1nVEQf2Aw4xAq2ds2qe3MLRzlNXpcmbu2NP9AzqILKeY_On-kU1vJlWDcf0Jro5-Xh4eB20zhcDGMq0wRBwZm5C5tonJ-ciGGm15FEY6lE57kWYulh5P58hadLhNmkmXOWG9s9I5waMtWC4npfsCjGuHfpGIUpNZYZ3UXosMvxmmGc_zSA-Ad2xUtkUap4YXf1SXUnarkPOKOK-4UMj5AXzvp0wbmI23iEUnG7WwVxSagbem7XVyVHiG6GJEl24y_6sIkAYjXfS1BvC5kWu_CgwPJSqteADpgsR7AsLnXnxTFjc1TrfICD4v2X7fcndglZ4oLS3MvsJyNZu7b-gAVWYXPhycnP8-2a13-jOe2Ajr
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB4BVUUvFW15bEuLK_VUKVpv4iTOkSLQ0gIXQFqpB8t2bBGEsqtt9sCNn9H-PX4JM3mJpSqHXuOxZc3Y88iMvwH4knjhfSJtkHCdBkJyg3fOy8DzkaTO21wbeuB8epaML8X3STxZgYPuLQyVVba6v9HptbZuvwxbbg5nRTE8r8HS0L7hggRSkq7CC_QGEgLQP55861MJGFHUCUukDoi8S23WRV52Yai8K67hTuPoX8bpb-fzaQ3lI6N0tAGvW2-S7TcbfgMrrnwLL5v-krfv4Od5NS_oXzgr-ndXrGuJggoCPzNCrZ6zWV_fwtDQUVmny5m5Zfd3v9FDZDkF5fd3f9jsalo1INebcHl0eHEwDtpuCoGNZVphjDgyNiF7bROT85ENNRrzKIx0KJ32Is1cLD1ez5G16HGbNJMuc8J6Z6VzgkdbsFZOS7cDjGuHjpGIUpNZYZ3UXosM1wzTjOd5pAfAOzYq20KNU8eLG9XVlF0r5LwizisuFHJ-AF_7KbMGZ-M5YtHJRi0dFoV24Llpnzs5KrxElBnRpZsufilCpMFQF52tAWw3cu13gfGhRK0VDyBdknhPQADdyyNlcVUDdYuM8POS9_-33T1YH1-cnqiT47MfH-AVjVCNWpjtwlo1X7iP6A1V5lN92h8ApGUKbA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Striking+individual+differences+in+color+perception+uncovered+by+%27the+dress%27+photograph&rft.jtitle=Current+biology&rft.au=Lafer-Sousa%2C+Rosa&rft.au=Hermann%2C+Katherine+L&rft.au=Conway%2C+Bevil+R&rft.date=2015-06-29&rft.eissn=1879-0445&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=R545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.cub.2015.04.053&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F25981795&rft.externalDocID=25981795
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0960-9822&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0960-9822&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0960-9822&client=summon