ElectroMotive drug administration (EMDA) of Mitomycin C as first-line salvage therapy in high risk “BCG failure” non muscle invasive bladder cancer: 3 years follow-up outcomes

Background In case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the “gold” standard therapy, up to 50% of patients relapse, needing radical cystectomy. Hence, alternative therapeutic strategies have been developed. The aim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC cancer Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 1224 - 9
Main Authors Racioppi, Marco, Di Gianfrancesco, Luca, Ragonese, Mauro, Palermo, Giuseppe, Sacco, Emilio, Bassi, Pier Francesco
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 06.12.2018
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1471-2407
1471-2407
DOI10.1186/s12885-018-5134-7

Cover

Abstract Background In case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the “gold” standard therapy, up to 50% of patients relapse, needing radical cystectomy. Hence, alternative therapeutic strategies have been developed. The aim of the study was to evaluate a first-line salvage treatment with EMDA®-MMC in patients with HGNMIBC unresponsive to BCG. Methods We carried out a prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase II study in order to evaluate the efficacy (in terms of recurrence and progression) and the safety of the EMDA®-MMC treatment in 26 (21 male, 5 female) consecutive patients with “BCG refractory” HGNMIBC on a 3 years follow-up. EMDA®-MMC treatment consisted of 40 mg of MMC diluted in 100 ml of sterile water retained in the bladder for 30 min with 20 mA pulsed electric current. EMDA®-MMC regimen consisted of an induction course of 6 weekly instillations followed by a maintenance course of 6 monthly instillations. Follow-up was performed with systematic mapping biopsies of the bladder (with sampling in the prostatic urethra for men), voiding and washing urinary cytology, radiological study of the upper urinary tract. We performed Survival Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank test in order to analyze high grade disease-free survival. Results At the end of follow-up, 16 patients (61.5%) preserved their native bladder; 10 patients (38.4%) underwent radical cystectomy, in 6 patients (23.1%) for recurrent HGNMIBC and in 4 patients (15.4%) for progression to muscle-invasive disease. At the end of follow-up, stratifying patients based on TNM classification (TaG3, T1G3, Cis, TaT1G3 + Cis), disease-free rates were 75, 71.4, 50 and 25%, respectively; survival curves showed statistically significant differences ( p value < 0.05). Regarding toxicity, we reported severe adverse systemic event of hypersensitivity to the MMC in 3 patients (11.5%), and local side effects in 6 patients (26.1%). Conclusions In the field of alternative strategies to radical cystectomy, the EMDA®-MMC could be considered safe and effective in high-risk NMIBC unresponsive to BCG, as a “bladder sparing” therapy in selected patients. Multicenter studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up might confirm our preliminary results. Trial registration EudraCT2017-002585-43. 17 June 2017 (retrospectively registered).
AbstractList Abstract Background In case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the “gold” standard therapy, up to 50% of patients relapse, needing radical cystectomy. Hence, alternative therapeutic strategies have been developed. The aim of the study was to evaluate a first-line salvage treatment with EMDA®-MMC in patients with HGNMIBC unresponsive to BCG. Methods We carried out a prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase II study in order to evaluate the efficacy (in terms of recurrence and progression) and the safety of the EMDA®-MMC treatment in 26 (21 male, 5 female) consecutive patients with “BCG refractory” HGNMIBC on a 3 years follow-up. EMDA®-MMC treatment consisted of 40 mg of MMC diluted in 100 ml of sterile water retained in the bladder for 30 min with 20 mA pulsed electric current. EMDA®-MMC regimen consisted of an induction course of 6 weekly instillations followed by a maintenance course of 6 monthly instillations. Follow-up was performed with systematic mapping biopsies of the bladder (with sampling in the prostatic urethra for men), voiding and washing urinary cytology, radiological study of the upper urinary tract. We performed Survival Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank test in order to analyze high grade disease-free survival. Results At the end of follow-up, 16 patients (61.5%) preserved their native bladder; 10 patients (38.4%) underwent radical cystectomy, in 6 patients (23.1%) for recurrent HGNMIBC and in 4 patients (15.4%) for progression to muscle-invasive disease. At the end of follow-up, stratifying patients based on TNM classification (TaG3, T1G3, Cis, TaT1G3 + Cis), disease-free rates were 75, 71.4, 50 and 25%, respectively; survival curves showed statistically significant differences (p value < 0.05). Regarding toxicity, we reported severe adverse systemic event of hypersensitivity to the MMC in 3 patients (11.5%), and local side effects in 6 patients (26.1%). Conclusions In the field of alternative strategies to radical cystectomy, the EMDA®-MMC could be considered safe and effective in high-risk NMIBC unresponsive to BCG, as a “bladder sparing” therapy in selected patients. Multicenter studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up might confirm our preliminary results. Trial registration EudraCT2017-002585-43. 17 June 2017 (retrospectively registered).
In case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the "gold" standard therapy, up to 50% of patients relapse, needing radical cystectomy. Hence, alternative therapeutic strategies have been developed. The aim of the study was to evaluate a first-line salvage treatment with EMDA[R]-MMC in patients with HGNMIBC unresponsive to BCG. We carried out a prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase II study in order to evaluate the efficacy (in terms of recurrence and progression) and the safety of the EMDA[R]-MMC treatment in 26 (21 male, 5 female) consecutive patients with "BCG refractory" HGNMIBC on a 3 years follow-up. At the end of follow-up, 16 patients (61.5%) preserved their native bladder; 10 patients (38.4%) underwent radical cystectomy, in 6 patients (23.1%) for recurrent HGNMIBC and in 4 patients (15.4%) for progression to muscle-invasive disease. In the field of alternative strategies to radical cystectomy, the EMDA[R]-MMC could be considered safe and effective in high-risk NMIBC unresponsive to BCG, as a "bladder sparing" therapy in selected patients. Multicenter studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up might confirm our preliminary results.
Background In case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the “gold” standard therapy, up to 50% of patients relapse, needing radical cystectomy. Hence, alternative therapeutic strategies have been developed. The aim of the study was to evaluate a first-line salvage treatment with EMDA®-MMC in patients with HGNMIBC unresponsive to BCG. Methods We carried out a prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase II study in order to evaluate the efficacy (in terms of recurrence and progression) and the safety of the EMDA®-MMC treatment in 26 (21 male, 5 female) consecutive patients with “BCG refractory” HGNMIBC on a 3 years follow-up. EMDA®-MMC treatment consisted of 40 mg of MMC diluted in 100 ml of sterile water retained in the bladder for 30 min with 20 mA pulsed electric current. EMDA®-MMC regimen consisted of an induction course of 6 weekly instillations followed by a maintenance course of 6 monthly instillations. Follow-up was performed with systematic mapping biopsies of the bladder (with sampling in the prostatic urethra for men), voiding and washing urinary cytology, radiological study of the upper urinary tract. We performed Survival Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank test in order to analyze high grade disease-free survival. Results At the end of follow-up, 16 patients (61.5%) preserved their native bladder; 10 patients (38.4%) underwent radical cystectomy, in 6 patients (23.1%) for recurrent HGNMIBC and in 4 patients (15.4%) for progression to muscle-invasive disease. At the end of follow-up, stratifying patients based on TNM classification (TaG3, T1G3, Cis, TaT1G3 + Cis), disease-free rates were 75, 71.4, 50 and 25%, respectively; survival curves showed statistically significant differences ( p value < 0.05). Regarding toxicity, we reported severe adverse systemic event of hypersensitivity to the MMC in 3 patients (11.5%), and local side effects in 6 patients (26.1%). Conclusions In the field of alternative strategies to radical cystectomy, the EMDA®-MMC could be considered safe and effective in high-risk NMIBC unresponsive to BCG, as a “bladder sparing” therapy in selected patients. Multicenter studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up might confirm our preliminary results. Trial registration EudraCT2017-002585-43. 17 June 2017 (retrospectively registered).
Background In case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the "gold" standard therapy, up to 50% of patients relapse, needing radical cystectomy. Hence, alternative therapeutic strategies have been developed. The aim of the study was to evaluate a first-line salvage treatment with EMDA[R]-MMC in patients with HGNMIBC unresponsive to BCG. Methods We carried out a prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase II study in order to evaluate the efficacy (in terms of recurrence and progression) and the safety of the EMDA[R]-MMC treatment in 26 (21 male, 5 female) consecutive patients with "BCG refractory" HGNMIBC on a 3 years follow-up. EMDA[R]-MMC treatment consisted of 40 mg of MMC diluted in 100 ml of sterile water retained in the bladder for 30 min with 20 mA pulsed electric current. EMDA[R]-MMC regimen consisted of an induction course of 6 weekly instillations followed by a maintenance course of 6 monthly instillations. Follow-up was performed with systematic mapping biopsies of the bladder (with sampling in the prostatic urethra for men), voiding and washing urinary cytology, radiological study of the upper urinary tract. We performed Survival Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank test in order to analyze high grade disease-free survival. Results At the end of follow-up, 16 patients (61.5%) preserved their native bladder; 10 patients (38.4%) underwent radical cystectomy, in 6 patients (23.1%) for recurrent HGNMIBC and in 4 patients (15.4%) for progression to muscle-invasive disease. At the end of follow-up, stratifying patients based on TNM classification (TaG3, T1G3, Cis, TaT1G3 + Cis), disease-free rates were 75, 71.4, 50 and 25%, respectively; survival curves showed statistically significant differences (p value < 0.05). Regarding toxicity, we reported severe adverse systemic event of hypersensitivity to the MMC in 3 patients (11.5%), and local side effects in 6 patients (26.1%). Conclusions In the field of alternative strategies to radical cystectomy, the EMDA[R]-MMC could be considered safe and effective in high-risk NMIBC unresponsive to BCG, as a "bladder sparing" therapy in selected patients. Multicenter studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up might confirm our preliminary results. Trial registration EudraCT2017-002585-43. 17 June 2017 (retrospectively registered). Keywords: EMDA, Device-assisted therapy, High risk non muscle-invasive bladder cancer, BCG failure, Mitomycin C, Salvage therapy, Sparing bladder
Background In case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the “gold” standard therapy, up to 50% of patients relapse, needing radical cystectomy. Hence, alternative therapeutic strategies have been developed. The aim of the study was to evaluate a first-line salvage treatment with EMDA®-MMC in patients with HGNMIBC unresponsive to BCG. Methods We carried out a prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase II study in order to evaluate the efficacy (in terms of recurrence and progression) and the safety of the EMDA®-MMC treatment in 26 (21 male, 5 female) consecutive patients with “BCG refractory” HGNMIBC on a 3 years follow-up. EMDA®-MMC treatment consisted of 40 mg of MMC diluted in 100 ml of sterile water retained in the bladder for 30 min with 20 mA pulsed electric current. EMDA®-MMC regimen consisted of an induction course of 6 weekly instillations followed by a maintenance course of 6 monthly instillations. Follow-up was performed with systematic mapping biopsies of the bladder (with sampling in the prostatic urethra for men), voiding and washing urinary cytology, radiological study of the upper urinary tract. We performed Survival Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank test in order to analyze high grade disease-free survival. Results At the end of follow-up, 16 patients (61.5%) preserved their native bladder; 10 patients (38.4%) underwent radical cystectomy, in 6 patients (23.1%) for recurrent HGNMIBC and in 4 patients (15.4%) for progression to muscle-invasive disease. At the end of follow-up, stratifying patients based on TNM classification (TaG3, T1G3, Cis, TaT1G3 + Cis), disease-free rates were 75, 71.4, 50 and 25%, respectively; survival curves showed statistically significant differences (p value < 0.05). Regarding toxicity, we reported severe adverse systemic event of hypersensitivity to the MMC in 3 patients (11.5%), and local side effects in 6 patients (26.1%). Conclusions In the field of alternative strategies to radical cystectomy, the EMDA®-MMC could be considered safe and effective in high-risk NMIBC unresponsive to BCG, as a “bladder sparing” therapy in selected patients. Multicenter studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up might confirm our preliminary results. Trial registration EudraCT2017-002585-43. 17 June 2017 (retrospectively registered).
In case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the "gold" standard therapy, up to 50% of patients relapse, needing radical cystectomy. Hence, alternative therapeutic strategies have been developed. The aim of the study was to evaluate a first-line salvage treatment with EMDA®-MMC in patients with HGNMIBC unresponsive to BCG.BACKGROUNDIn case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the "gold" standard therapy, up to 50% of patients relapse, needing radical cystectomy. Hence, alternative therapeutic strategies have been developed. The aim of the study was to evaluate a first-line salvage treatment with EMDA®-MMC in patients with HGNMIBC unresponsive to BCG.We carried out a prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase II study in order to evaluate the efficacy (in terms of recurrence and progression) and the safety of the EMDA®-MMC treatment in 26 (21 male, 5 female) consecutive patients with "BCG refractory" HGNMIBC on a 3 years follow-up. EMDA®-MMC treatment consisted of 40 mg of MMC diluted in 100 ml of sterile water retained in the bladder for 30 min with 20 mA pulsed electric current. EMDA®-MMC regimen consisted of an induction course of 6 weekly instillations followed by a maintenance course of 6 monthly instillations. Follow-up was performed with systematic mapping biopsies of the bladder (with sampling in the prostatic urethra for men), voiding and washing urinary cytology, radiological study of the upper urinary tract. We performed Survival Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank test in order to analyze high grade disease-free survival.METHODSWe carried out a prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase II study in order to evaluate the efficacy (in terms of recurrence and progression) and the safety of the EMDA®-MMC treatment in 26 (21 male, 5 female) consecutive patients with "BCG refractory" HGNMIBC on a 3 years follow-up. EMDA®-MMC treatment consisted of 40 mg of MMC diluted in 100 ml of sterile water retained in the bladder for 30 min with 20 mA pulsed electric current. EMDA®-MMC regimen consisted of an induction course of 6 weekly instillations followed by a maintenance course of 6 monthly instillations. Follow-up was performed with systematic mapping biopsies of the bladder (with sampling in the prostatic urethra for men), voiding and washing urinary cytology, radiological study of the upper urinary tract. We performed Survival Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank test in order to analyze high grade disease-free survival.At the end of follow-up, 16 patients (61.5%) preserved their native bladder; 10 patients (38.4%) underwent radical cystectomy, in 6 patients (23.1%) for recurrent HGNMIBC and in 4 patients (15.4%) for progression to muscle-invasive disease. At the end of follow-up, stratifying patients based on TNM classification (TaG3, T1G3, Cis, TaT1G3 + Cis), disease-free rates were 75, 71.4, 50 and 25%, respectively; survival curves showed statistically significant differences (p value < 0.05). Regarding toxicity, we reported severe adverse systemic event of hypersensitivity to the MMC in 3 patients (11.5%), and local side effects in 6 patients (26.1%).RESULTSAt the end of follow-up, 16 patients (61.5%) preserved their native bladder; 10 patients (38.4%) underwent radical cystectomy, in 6 patients (23.1%) for recurrent HGNMIBC and in 4 patients (15.4%) for progression to muscle-invasive disease. At the end of follow-up, stratifying patients based on TNM classification (TaG3, T1G3, Cis, TaT1G3 + Cis), disease-free rates were 75, 71.4, 50 and 25%, respectively; survival curves showed statistically significant differences (p value < 0.05). Regarding toxicity, we reported severe adverse systemic event of hypersensitivity to the MMC in 3 patients (11.5%), and local side effects in 6 patients (26.1%).In the field of alternative strategies to radical cystectomy, the EMDA®-MMC could be considered safe and effective in high-risk NMIBC unresponsive to BCG, as a "bladder sparing" therapy in selected patients. Multicenter studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up might confirm our preliminary results.CONCLUSIONSIn the field of alternative strategies to radical cystectomy, the EMDA®-MMC could be considered safe and effective in high-risk NMIBC unresponsive to BCG, as a "bladder sparing" therapy in selected patients. Multicenter studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up might confirm our preliminary results.EudraCT2017-002585-43. 17 June 2017 (retrospectively registered).TRIAL REGISTRATIONEudraCT2017-002585-43. 17 June 2017 (retrospectively registered).
In case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the "gold" standard therapy, up to 50% of patients relapse, needing radical cystectomy. Hence, alternative therapeutic strategies have been developed. The aim of the study was to evaluate a first-line salvage treatment with EMDA®-MMC in patients with HGNMIBC unresponsive to BCG. We carried out a prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase II study in order to evaluate the efficacy (in terms of recurrence and progression) and the safety of the EMDA®-MMC treatment in 26 (21 male, 5 female) consecutive patients with "BCG refractory" HGNMIBC on a 3 years follow-up. EMDA®-MMC treatment consisted of 40 mg of MMC diluted in 100 ml of sterile water retained in the bladder for 30 min with 20 mA pulsed electric current. EMDA®-MMC regimen consisted of an induction course of 6 weekly instillations followed by a maintenance course of 6 monthly instillations. Follow-up was performed with systematic mapping biopsies of the bladder (with sampling in the prostatic urethra for men), voiding and washing urinary cytology, radiological study of the upper urinary tract. We performed Survival Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank test in order to analyze high grade disease-free survival. At the end of follow-up, 16 patients (61.5%) preserved their native bladder; 10 patients (38.4%) underwent radical cystectomy, in 6 patients (23.1%) for recurrent HGNMIBC and in 4 patients (15.4%) for progression to muscle-invasive disease. At the end of follow-up, stratifying patients based on TNM classification (TaG3, T1G3, Cis, TaT1G3 + Cis), disease-free rates were 75, 71.4, 50 and 25%, respectively; survival curves showed statistically significant differences (p value < 0.05). Regarding toxicity, we reported severe adverse systemic event of hypersensitivity to the MMC in 3 patients (11.5%), and local side effects in 6 patients (26.1%). In the field of alternative strategies to radical cystectomy, the EMDA®-MMC could be considered safe and effective in high-risk NMIBC unresponsive to BCG, as a "bladder sparing" therapy in selected patients. Multicenter studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up might confirm our preliminary results. EudraCT2017-002585-43. 17 June 2017 (retrospectively registered).
ArticleNumber 1224
Audience Academic
Author Ragonese, Mauro
Bassi, Pier Francesco
Di Gianfrancesco, Luca
Palermo, Giuseppe
Racioppi, Marco
Sacco, Emilio
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Marco
  surname: Racioppi
  fullname: Racioppi, Marco
  organization: Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Luca
  surname: Di Gianfrancesco
  fullname: Di Gianfrancesco, Luca
  organization: Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Mauro
  surname: Ragonese
  fullname: Ragonese, Mauro
  organization: Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Giuseppe
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0564-7415
  surname: Palermo
  fullname: Palermo, Giuseppe
  email: gpalerm@libero.it
  organization: Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Emilio
  surname: Sacco
  fullname: Sacco, Emilio
  organization: Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Pier Francesco
  surname: Bassi
  fullname: Bassi, Pier Francesco
  organization: Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30522445$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9k81u1DAUhSNURH_gAdggS0ioXaTYjpN4WCCVoZRKrZD4WVse-ybj4sSD7QzMrlveAR6DF-qT4Om0tFMByiKR851zfY_u3c42etdDlj0meJ8QXj0PhHJe5pjwvCQFy-t72RZhNckpw_XGre_NbDuEM4xJzTF_kG0WuKSUsXIr-3VoQUXvTl00c0DaDy2SujO9CdHLaFyPdg9PXx_sIdegUxNdt1CmR2MkA2qMDzG3pgcUpJ3LFlCcgpezBUrI1LRT5E34jC7Of7waH6FGGjt4uDj_iVIfqBuCspDIuQzL0hMrtQaPlOwV-BeouDj_vgDpUx1nrfuaDzPkhqhcB-Fhdr-RNsCjq_dO9unN4cfx2_zk3dHx-OAkVyUv6lzWGiZMVQVjGo8qgjXnUlFMQMmiLllZE6jqRrOSsmJS4VIzrjEvk44TQmWxkx2vfLWTZ2LmTSf9QjhpxOWB862QPprUh1AYaCUJwZIDKzAdNZiPFJVKTbCeYJ68Xq68ZsOkA62gTwHbNdP1P72ZitbNRUU5LYoyGexeGXj3ZYAQRWeCAmtlD24IgpKy5KOacZLQp3fQMzf4PkW1pDijI0zoDdXK1IDpG5fqqqWpOCgrXuERpXWi9v9CpUdDZ1QayMak8zXB3pogMRG-xVYOIYjjD-_X2We32ClIG6fB2WE5eGEdfHI7vT-xXU9yAuoVoLwLwUMjlImXA5yua6wgWCx3Rqx2RqSdEcudEUtrckd5bf4_DV1pQmL7FvxNwP8W_QaZeilg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_2090598X_2020_1816150
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2021_09_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbcan_2022_188808
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00432_023_04688_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ucl_2019_09_014
crossref_primary_10_12677_ACM_2021_119623
crossref_primary_10_1002_adtp_202000248
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2020_02_012
crossref_primary_10_1080_14737140_2020_1822743
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_019_02183_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_023_04372_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2022_09_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cpt_2023_11_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuro_2020_08_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euo_2020_02_006
crossref_primary_10_1080_14656566_2024_2380469
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers17030453
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2023_03_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2021_05_015
crossref_primary_10_2217_imt_2022_0309
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00120_024_02417_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuro_2024_01_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2024_07_027
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_purol_2020_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jddst_2024_106110
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_40962
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000769
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuroe_2020_08_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2022_10_019
crossref_primary_10_3390_pharmaceutics13020166
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2020_06_031
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11912_022_01350_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pacs_2022_100400
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jval_2022_12_005
crossref_primary_10_1159_000520630
crossref_primary_10_22465_juo_234600420021
crossref_primary_10_4111_icu_20200602
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000001065
crossref_primary_10_3390_cells11030357
crossref_primary_10_1177_17588359211039052
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuroe_2024_04_005
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15051455
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euo_2024_10_012
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14204980
crossref_primary_10_1177_20503121231160408
crossref_primary_10_3233_BLC_230042
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2021_08_010
crossref_primary_10_1155_2024_9916707
crossref_primary_10_2147_RRU_S464068
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_023_03765_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11934_024_01250_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejphar_2022_175024
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000863
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000789
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2022_03_009
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_021_03666_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euo_2024_05_012
Cites_doi 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02306.x
10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.041
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67281-3
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64043-8
10.1097/01.ju.0000062605.92268.c6
10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00625-0
10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.135
10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.062
10.1016/S1078-1439(03)00144-3
10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.090
10.1097/MOU.0b013e328356adff
10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63174-4
10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00431.x
10.3834/uij.1944-5784.2011.12.15
10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.2749
10.1038/nrurol.2017.16
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04655.x
10.1016/S0022-5347(17)34865-6
10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.014
10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.023
10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666
10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.038
10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.025
10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.11.033
10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.024
10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.12.005
10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.076
10.1097/01.ju.0000080568.91703.18
10.1007/s00345-009-0402-4
10.1097/01.ju.0000073852.24341.4a
10.1002/cncr.24634
10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.017
10.1371/journal.pmed.0040284
10.1200/JCO.2015.64.4070
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s). 2018
COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright © 2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s). 2018
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
ISR
3V.
7TO
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
H94
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12885-018-5134-7
DatabaseName Springer Nature Open Access Journals
CrossRef
PubMed
Gale In Context: Science
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection (NC LIVE)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList



Publicly Available Content Database


MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: DOA
  name: Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1471-2407
EndPage 9
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_c0e26a110a8e43029f089c2accb0db08
PMC6282335
A568609227
30522445
10_1186_s12885_018_5134_7
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACMJI
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
H13
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ISR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
U2A
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
AAYXX
ALIPV
CITATION
NPM
PMFND
3V.
7TO
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
H94
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5837-a7deb4c6344d09610d88ac201eca3754571e67fd45243b605d48d085a7d8112a3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1471-2407
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:10:52 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 13:52:24 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 18:00:16 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 06:37:42 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:39:16 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:18:25 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 04:16:35 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:01:07 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:30:52 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:57:45 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:06:12 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:29:04 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Sparing bladder
Device-assisted therapy
EMDA
High risk non muscle-invasive bladder cancer
BCG failure
Mitomycin C
Salvage therapy
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5837-a7deb4c6344d09610d88ac201eca3754571e67fd45243b605d48d085a7d8112a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-0564-7415
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/c0e26a110a8e43029f089c2accb0db08
PMID 30522445
PQID 2158429012
PQPubID 44074
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c0e26a110a8e43029f089c2accb0db08
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6282335
proquest_miscellaneous_2155897481
proquest_journals_2158429012
gale_infotracmisc_A568609227
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A568609227
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A568609227
gale_healthsolutions_A568609227
pubmed_primary_30522445
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12885_018_5134_7
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_018_5134_7
springer_journals_10_1186_s12885_018_5134_7
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20181206
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-12-06
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2018
  text: 20181206
  day: 6
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle BMC cancer
PublicationTitleAbbrev BMC Cancer
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Cancer
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BMC
References MD Shelley (5134_CR31) 2004; 93
M Babjuk (5134_CR1) 2017; 71
AM Kamat (5134_CR27) 2017; 14
PU Malmstrom (5134_CR28) 2009; 56
A Ojea (5134_CR7) 2007; 52
M Brausi (5134_CR2) 2011; 186
FJ Bianco Jr (5134_CR12) 2004; 22
E Solsona (5134_CR23) 2000; 164
A Böhle (5134_CR3) 2003; 170
SP Lerner (5134_CR25) 2009; 27
JP Stein (5134_CR8) 2001; 19
HW Herr (5134_CR9) 1997; 80
SM Stasi Di (5134_CR19) 1999; 59
A Bohle (5134_CR32) 2003; 169
MH Kamel (5134_CR26) 2011; 4
CL Amling (5134_CR10) 1994; 151
RJ Sylvester (5134_CR33) 2005; 66
O Nativ (5134_CR37) 2009; 182
GV Raj (5134_CR11) 2007; 177
MD Shelley (5134_CR29) 2001; 88
AM Kamat (5134_CR38) 2016; 34
RJ Sylvester (5134_CR6) 2009; 57
RE Hautmann (5134_CR13) 2009; 27
SM Stasi Di (5134_CR18) 1997; 57
P Gontero (5134_CR4) 2010; 57
A Giannantoni (5134_CR17) 2006; 50
RF Han (5134_CR30) 2006; 67
G Sauter (5134_CR35) 2004
5134_CR34
HW Herr (5134_CR24) 2003; 169
JH Ku (5134_CR16) 2012; 22
M Brausi (5134_CR20) 1998; 51
LJ Sockett (5134_CR36) 2008; 101
MD Shelley (5134_CR5) 2010; 36
GS Kulkarni (5134_CR15) 2009; 115
SM Stasi Di (5134_CR21) 2003; 170
CR Riedl (5134_CR39) 1998; 159
GS Kulkarni (5134_CR14) 2007; 4
L Gianfrancesco Di (5134_CR22) 2018; 199
References_xml – volume: 88
  start-page: 209
  year: 2001
  ident: 5134_CR29
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02306.x
– volume: 71
  start-page: 447
  issue: 3
  year: 2017
  ident: 5134_CR1
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.041
– volume: 164
  start-page: 685
  year: 2000
  ident: 5134_CR23
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67281-3
– volume: 169
  start-page: 90
  year: 2003
  ident: 5134_CR32
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64043-8
– volume: 169
  start-page: 1706
  year: 2003
  ident: 5134_CR24
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000062605.92268.c6
– volume: 57
  start-page: 875
  issue: 5
  year: 1997
  ident: 5134_CR18
  publication-title: Cancer Res
– volume: 51
  start-page: 506
  year: 1998
  ident: 5134_CR20
  publication-title: Urology
  doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00625-0
– volume: 66
  start-page: 90
  year: 2005
  ident: 5134_CR33
  publication-title: Urology
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.135
– start-page: 29
  volume-title: WHO classification of classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs
  year: 2004
  ident: 5134_CR35
– volume: 52
  start-page: 1398
  issue: 5
  year: 2007
  ident: 5134_CR7
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.062
– volume: 101
  start-page: 50
  issue: suppl 5
  year: 2008
  ident: 5134_CR36
  publication-title: BJU Int
– volume: 22
  start-page: 290
  year: 2004
  ident: 5134_CR12
  publication-title: Urol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S1078-1439(03)00144-3
– volume: 177
  start-page: 1283
  year: 2007
  ident: 5134_CR11
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.090
– volume: 22
  start-page: 405
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: 5134_CR16
  publication-title: Curr Opin Urol
  doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328356adff
– volume: 159
  start-page: 1851
  issue: 6
  year: 1998
  ident: 5134_CR39
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63174-4
– volume: 80
  start-page: 762
  year: 1997
  ident: 5134_CR9
  publication-title: Br J Urol
  doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00431.x
– volume: 4
  start-page: art 82
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  ident: 5134_CR26
  publication-title: UroToday Int J
  doi: 10.3834/uij.1944-5784.2011.12.15
– volume: 199
  start-page: e1115
  issue: Issue 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 5134_CR22
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.2749
– volume: 14
  start-page: 244
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: 5134_CR27
  publication-title: Nat Rev Urol
  doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.16
– volume: 59
  start-page: 4912
  issue: 19
  year: 1999
  ident: 5134_CR19
  publication-title: Cancer Res
– volume: 93
  start-page: 485
  year: 2004
  ident: 5134_CR31
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04655.x
– volume: 151
  start-page: 31
  issue: 1
  year: 1994
  ident: 5134_CR10
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)34865-6
– ident: 5134_CR34
– volume: 67
  start-page: 1216
  year: 2006
  ident: 5134_CR30
  publication-title: Urology
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.014
– volume: 57
  start-page: 410
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: 5134_CR4
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.023
– volume: 19
  start-page: 666
  year: 2001
  ident: 5134_CR8
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666
– volume: 56
  start-page: 247
  year: 2009
  ident: 5134_CR28
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.038
– volume: 50
  start-page: 1183
  issue: 6
  year: 2006
  ident: 5134_CR17
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.025
– volume: 27
  start-page: 155
  year: 2009
  ident: 5134_CR25
  publication-title: Urol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.11.033
– volume: 57
  start-page: 766
  issue: 5
  year: 2009
  ident: 5134_CR6
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.024
– volume: 36
  start-page: 195
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: 5134_CR5
  publication-title: Cancer Treat Rev
  doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.12.005
– volume: 186
  start-page: 2158
  year: 2011
  ident: 5134_CR2
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.076
– volume: 170
  start-page: 777
  year: 2003
  ident: 5134_CR21
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000080568.91703.18
– volume: 27
  start-page: 347
  year: 2009
  ident: 5134_CR13
  publication-title: World J Urol
  doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0402-4
– volume: 170
  start-page: 964
  issue: 3
  year: 2003
  ident: 5134_CR3
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000073852.24341.4a
– volume: 115
  start-page: 5450
  year: 2009
  ident: 5134_CR15
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.24634
– volume: 182
  start-page: 1313
  issue: 4
  year: 2009
  ident: 5134_CR37
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.017
– volume: 4
  start-page: e284
  year: 2007
  ident: 5134_CR14
  publication-title: PLoS Med
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040284
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1935
  issue: 16
  year: 2016
  ident: 5134_CR38
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.4070
SSID ssj0017808
Score 2.487132
Snippet Background In case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the “gold”...
In case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the "gold" standard therapy,...
Background In case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the "gold"...
Background In case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the “gold”...
Abstract Background In case of high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC), intravesical BCG represents the first-line treatment; despite the...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1224
SubjectTerms Analysis
Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccine
BCG
BCG failure
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Bladder cancer
Cancer
Cancer Research
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
Chemotherapy
Classification
Clinical medicine
Clinical trials
Complications and side effects
Cystectomy
Cytology
Device-assisted therapy
EMDA
Experimental therapeutics and drug development
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
High risk non muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Hypersensitivity
Immunotherapy
Invasiveness
Medicine/Public Health
Meta-analysis
Mitomycin C
Oncology
Patients
Research Article
Salvage therapy
Statistical analysis
Studies
Surgical Oncology
Survival
Systematic review
Toxicity
Treatment outcome
Tumors
Urethra
Urinary tract
Urology
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection (NC LIVE)
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3NjtMwELZgkRAXxD-FBQxC4k_ROonjOFxQt3RZkMoBWKk3y7GTUqnblKZZ1FuvvAM8Bi_UJ2EmcbtkEXtNxonj-fFMZvwNIU9jLXjEgtzLDYJqi5x5qWSxl4bciARcgrBOtA8-isMj_mEYDd0Pt9KVVW5sYm2obWHwH_kebE2SY9IveDP75mHXKMyuuhYaF8mlGroM5DkebgMuP5ZMukymL8VeCbZYYqma9CI_5F7c2otqyP5_DfNfO9PZqskzqdN6Rzq4Rq46V5J2G95fJxey6Q1yeeCS5TfJ737T4maALcwyaufViOoWVi593h-87b6gRU4HoNnHSxhIe1SXNB-DV-ihC0pLPTkBo0Obk1pLCiSIcUyxKJ2uVz_3e-9orsdY3r5e_aJTeOxxVcKMgPJEY3U8TSdo3-bUoIjNX9NwvfqxBBWD94AYFt-9akaLagGMyMpb5Oig_6V36LkuDZ6JILr1dGyzFBgbcm6xfwyzUiLuo58Zjf11o9jPRJxbHgU8TCF6slxacPRgnARnT4e3yQ5MLbtLKGM2EhxotfS5nyQ6EDbEp0IQaoUvO4Rt-KWMgzDHThoTVYcyUqiGxQpYrJDFKu6Ql9shswa_4zzifRSCLSFCb9cXivlIOU1WhmWB0OA1aZnxkAVJzmRiAm1MymzKYJKPUIRUc451a0BUNxJSsCQI4DVPagqE35hifc9IV2Wp3n_-1CJ65ojyAr7RaHdcAlYKEbtalLstSrAPpn17I8vK2adSnWpThzze3saRWHM3zYqqpokkhJvS75A7jehvVwZ2CfD9eNQhcUspWkvXvjMdf63RywUE-WEII19t1Od0Wv_lzL3zP-I-uRKgWmOZkdglO4t5lT0AZ3GRPqwtwh-zfmgM
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtNAEF6VIiEuiH8MBRaExE9lWNvr9RoJoTSkFCRzACL1tlqv7RApjYsdF3LLlXeAx-CF8iTM2E6KS-HENf7G3uz87IxmdoaQB4EW3GduZmcGm2qLjNmxZIEde9yIEFwCr060R-_E3pC_3ff3N8hqvFW7geWpoR3OkxoWk6dfP89fgsK_qBVeimcl2FiJJWjS9h2P28EZchYOJoGxWMSPkwqBZLJNbJ5K1jma6g7-f9rp3w6qk0WUJzKp9QG1e5FcaD1L2mtE4RLZSKeXybmozZ1fIT8HzcSbCCeapTQpqhHVnda59NEgetV7TPOMRqDoB3MgpH2qS5qNwUm00SOlpZ4cgQ2izcWtOQUItjymWKNOl4vvO_3XNNNjrHZfLn7QKbz2oCphRYA80lgsT-MJmruCGpS44jn1lotvc9A4-A5IZf7Frg5pXs1AF9LyKhnuDj729-x2aINtfAh2bR0kaQx89jhPcJwMS6TENpBOajSO2_UDJxVBlnDf5V4MwVTCZQJ-H9BJ8P20d41swtLSG4QylviCA1ZLhzthqF2RePhWiEkT4UiLsBW_lGk7muNgjYmqIxspVMNiBSxWyGIVWOTJmuSwaefxL_AOCsEaiJ246x_yYqRaxVaGpa7Q4ERpmXKPuWHGZGhcbUzMkpjBIu-iCKnmWuvanqieL6RgoevCZ-7XCOzGMcVyn5GuylK9-fC-A3rYgrIc_qPR7e0J2Cls4NVBbnWQYC5M9_FKltVK2xT4fZJjRt21yL31Y6TEErxpmlc1xpcQfUrHItcb0V_vDBwa4Apy3yJBRyk6W9d9Mh1_qpuZC4j5PQ8ot1fqc7ysv3Lm5v_gzC1y3kXlx9oksUU2Z0WV3gYPcxbfqe3GL6gKeEU
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
– databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM)
  dbid: U2A
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lj9MwELZgkRAXxJvCAgYh8VhFOI7jONy6pcuCVA5Apb1ZjuOUSt1m1TSLeuuV_wA_gz_UX8JMkgayPCSuzTeJ63l4RjOeIeRxZKQIGc-8zGJTbZkxL1Es8pJAWBmDSxBUifbRO3k4Fm-PwqPmHnexrXbfpiQrS12ptZIvCrCkCgvNlBf6gfCi8-RCCMcXivKY99vUQaSYatKXfyTrHEBVn_7frfEvx9HZUskz-dLqGDq4Qi43_iPt1wy_Ss65-TVycdRkyK-T78N6rs0I55Y5mi7KCTWdBrn06XD0qv-M5hkdgTofr4CQDqgpaDYFV9BDv5MWZnYKlobW17NWFCDY2JhiJTrdrL_uD17TzEyxpn2z_kbn8NrjsoAVAfLUYEk8TWZo1BbUolwtXtJgs_6yAr2C74Ds5Z-98oTm5RI23xU3yPhg-HFw6DWjGTwbQkjrmSh1CXAzECLFoTEsVQqbPfrOGhyqG0a-k1GWipCLIIGQKRUqBe8O6BR4eCa4SXZgae42oYyloRSANcoXfhwbLtMA3wqRZyp91SNsyy9tm77lOD5jpqv4RUlds1gDizWyWEc98rwlOambdvwLvI9C0AKx33b1Q76Y6EZ9tWWOSwOuklFOBIzHGVOx5cbahKUJg0U-QBHS9eXV1mrofiiVZDHn8JlHFQJ7bsyxqGdiyqLQbz6874CeNKAsh_9oTXNHAnYK23R1kLsdJBgF2328lWXdGKVCg3enBObNeY88bB8jJRbazV1eVphQQYyp_B65VYt-uzNwNIDDJ8IeiTpK0dm67pP59FPVslxCZB8EQLm3VZ-fy_orZ-78F_ouucRRy7HUSO6SneWidPfAYVwm9ysD8QOvEWTG
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title ElectroMotive drug administration (EMDA) of Mitomycin C as first-line salvage therapy in high risk “BCG failure” non muscle invasive bladder cancer: 3 years follow-up outcomes
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-018-5134-7
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30522445
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2158429012
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2155897481
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6282335
https://doaj.org/article/c0e26a110a8e43029f089c2accb0db08
Volume 18
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NjtMwELZgkRAXxD-BpRiExJ-idRLHcbi1pcuClBUqVKq4WI6TLJW6zappFvXWK-8Aj8EL9UmYSdKyWQRcuFhqPU4cz3g8oxl_Q8iTQAvuMzezM4Og2iJjdixZYMceNyIEk8CrAu3RoTgY8Xdjf3ym1BfmhNXwwPXC7RmWukLDIaVlyj3mhhmToXG1MTFL4vqaLwvZxplq4geBZLKJYTpS7BWghSUmqUnbdzxuB61TqALr_10lnzmTzudLnguaVmfR_jVytTEiabee_HVyIZ3dIJejJkx-k_wY1MVtIixeltJkXh5R3ULJpc8G0evuc5pnNII9fbyEgbRPdUGzCdiDNhqftNDTU1A3tL6jtaRAgujGFNPR6Xr1rdd_QzM9wcT29eo7ncFjj8sCZgSUpxrz4mk8Rc02pwaFa_6KeuvV1yVsLngPCGD-xS5PaF4uQOzT4hYZ7Q8-9g_spj6DbXzwa20dJGkMLPU4T7ByDEukRMRHJzUaK-v6gZOKIEu473IvBr8p4TIBEw_GSTDztHeb7MDU0ruEMpb4ggOtlg53wlC7IvHwqeB-JsKRFmEbfinTgJdjDY2pqpwYKVTNYgUsVshiFVjkxXbISY3c8TfiHgrBlhBBt6s_QBRVI4rqX6JokYcoQqq-wbpVHarrCylY6LrwmscVBQJvzDCz50iXRaHefhi2iJ42RFkO32h0c1ECVgqxulqUuy1K0Aym3b2RZdVopkKBiSc5Bs9dizzaduNIzLabpXlZ0fgSHE3pWOROLfrblYHzAaw-7lskaG2K1tK1e2aTzxVuuQD33vNg5MvN9vk1rT9y5t7_4Mx9csXFzY9pSGKX7CzmZfoAjMlF3CEXg3HQIZd6g8P3Q_jVF_1OpUugjbiEdtj7BO3I7f4Eg-d3DA
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3NbtQwELZKkYAL4p-FQg0C8aeojuM4DhJC_aWlTQ_QSr0Zx0nKStvNsmla7a1X3gFegRsvtE_CTJLdkiJ663U9ThzP-JuZnfEMIc8CI4XPeOZkFotqy4w5sWKBE3vCyhBMAq8KtEfbcn1XfNzz92bIr8ldGEyrnGBiBdRJbvE_8gVQTUpg0I-_H3xzsGsURlcnLTRqsdhMR8fgshXvNlaAv885X1vdWV53mq4CjvXBG3NMkKQxLMQTIsF-JyxRCusUuqk12A_WD9xUBlkifC68GKz9RKgEDBOYp8A4MR489xK5LDywreD8BHtTB88NFFNN5NRVcqEA7FeYGqcc3_WEE7R0X9Ui4F9F8JcmPJuleSZUW2nAtRvkemO60sVa1m6SmbR_i1yJmuD8bfJ7tW6pE2HLtJQmw3KfmlZtXvpyNVpZfEXzjEaAJAcjmEiXqSlo1gUr1EGTlxamdwQgR-ubYSMKJFhTmWISPB2f_Fha_kAz08V0-vHJT9qHxx6UBawIKI8MZuPTuId4OqQWRXr4lnrjk-8j4B28B8Q-P3bKAc3LQ2B8WtwhuxfCv7tkFpaW3ieUscSXAmiNcoUbhobLxMOngtObSFd1CJvwS9umZDp27ujpynVSUtcs1sBijSzWQYe8nk4Z1PVCziNeQiGYEmKp7-qHfLivG-TQlqVcGrDSjEpB6HiYMRVabqyNWRIzWOQ8ipCu781OAUsv-lJJFnIOr3laUWC5jz7mE-2bsij0xudPLaIXDVGWwzda01zPgJ3CCmEtyrkWJeCRbQ9PZFk3eFjo09PbIU-mwzgTc_z6aV5WNL4C91a5HXKvFv3pzoBWAltT-B0StA5Fa-vaI_3u16pauuSKex7MfDM5PqfL-i9nHpz_EfPk6vpOtKW3NrY3H5JrHI84pjjJOTJ7OCzTR2CoHsaPK3Sg5MtFw9EfSWGjDg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9NAEF5BkSouiDeBQheExEtW1_Z6veaWpgktkAoBkXpbrb12iJTaURwX5ZYr_wF-Bn8ov4QZ2zG4PCSu8Tf2ZuexM5rZGUIe-1pwjzmJlUTYVFskzAol863Q5ZEIwCVwy0T78FgcjvjrE--knnOab6rdNynJ6k4DdmlKF3szk1QqLsVeDlZVYtGZtDzb5ZZ_kVwCa2zjCIOR023SCL5ksk5l_pGsdRiVPft_t8y_HE3nyybP5U7LI2lwlVypfUnarZh_jVyI0-tke1hny2-Q7_1qxs0QZ5jF1MyLMdWtZrn0aX940H1Gs4QOQbVPl0BIe1TnNJmAW2ihD0pzPT0Dq0Orq1pLChBsckyxKp2uV1_3e69ooidY375efaMpvPa0yGFFgDzTWB5PwykauDmNUMbmL6m7Xn1Zgo7Bd0AOs89WMaNZsQBGxPlNMhr0P_YOrXpMgxV5EN5a2jdxCJx1OTc4QIYZKbHxox1HGgfser4dCz8x3HO4G0L4ZLg04OkBnQRvT7u3yBYsLb5DKGPGExywWtrcDgLtCOPiWyEKNcKWHcI2_FJR3cMcR2lMVRnLSKEqFitgsUIWK79Dnjcks6qBx7_A-ygEDRB7b5c_ZPOxqlVZRSx2hAa3ScuYu8wJEiaDyNFRFDITMljkLoqQqi6yNhZEdT0hBQscBz7zqERg_40UC3zGushzdfThfQv0pAYlGfzHSNf3JWCnsGVXC7nTQoKBiNqPN7KsagOVK_D0JMccutMhD5vHSIlFd2mcFSXGkxBvSrtDblei3-wMHBPg_HGvQ_yWUrS2rv0knXwq25cLiPJdFyhfbNTn57L-ypm7_4XeJdvvDgbq7dHxm3vksoMKjxVIYodsLeZFfB_8yEX4oLQVPwAlhWvt
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ElectroMotive+drug+administration+%28EMDA%29+of+Mitomycin+C+as+first-line+salvage+therapy+in+high+risk+%E2%80%9CBCG+failure%E2%80%9D+non+muscle+invasive+bladder+cancer%3A+3%E2%80%89years+follow-up+outcomes&rft.jtitle=BMC+cancer&rft.au=Marco+Racioppi&rft.au=Luca+Di+Gianfrancesco&rft.au=Mauro+Ragonese&rft.au=Giuseppe+Palermo&rft.date=2018-12-06&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=1471-2407&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12885-018-5134-7&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_c0e26a110a8e43029f089c2accb0db08
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon