Dedicated breast CT: Fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population
Purpose: To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients a...
Saved in:
| Published in | Medical physics (Lancaster) Vol. 39; no. 12; pp. 7317 - 7328 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
American Association of Physicists in Medicine
01.12.2012
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0094-2405 2473-4209 1522-8541 2473-4209 0094-2405 |
| DOI | 10.1118/1.4765050 |
Cover
| Abstract | Purpose:
To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients and for investigating the dependence of VGF on breast dimensions, race, and pathology.
Methods:
Image data from a clinical trial investigating the role of dedicated breast CT that enrolled 150 women were retrospectively analyzed to determine the VGF. The study was conducted in adherence to a protocol approved by the institutional human subjects review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants in the study were assigned BI-RADS® 4 or 5 as per the American College of Radiology assessment categories after standard diagnostic work-up and underwent dedicated breast CT exam prior to biopsy. A Gaussian-kernel based fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to partition the breast CT images into adipose and fibroglandular tissue after segmenting the skin. Upon determination of the accuracy of the algorithm with a phantom, it was applied to 137 breast CT volumes from 136 women. VGF was determined for each breast and the mean and range were determined. Pathology results with classification as benign, malignant, and hyperplasia were available for 132 women, and were used to investigate if the distributions of VGF varied with pathology.
Results:
The algorithm was accurate to within ±1.9% in determining the volume of an irregular shaped phantom. The study mean (± inter-breast SD) for the VGF was 0.172 ± 0.142 (range: 0.012–0.719). VGF was found to be negatively correlated with age, breast dimensions (chest-wall to nipple length, pectoralis to nipple length, and effective diameter at chest-wall), and total breast volume, and positively correlated with fibroglandular volume. Based on pathology, pairwise statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there was no significant difference in distributions of VGF without adjustment for age between malignant and nonmalignant breasts (p = 0.41). Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of VGF in increasing order of mammographic breast density indicated all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.002).
Conclusions:
This study used a different clinical prototype breast CT system than that in previous studies to image subjects from a different geographical region, and used a different algorithm for analysis of image data. The mean VGF estimated from this study is within the range reported in previous studies, indicating that the choice of 50% glandular weight fraction to represent an average breast for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography needs revising. In the study, the distributions of VGF did not differ significantly with pathology. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients and for investigating the dependence of VGF on breast dimensions, race, and pathology.
Image data from a clinical trial investigating the role of dedicated breast CT that enrolled 150 women were retrospectively analyzed to determine the VGF. The study was conducted in adherence to a protocol approved by the institutional human subjects review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants in the study were assigned BI-RADS(®) 4 or 5 as per the American College of Radiology assessment categories after standard diagnostic work-up and underwent dedicated breast CT exam prior to biopsy. A Gaussian-kernel based fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to partition the breast CT images into adipose and fibroglandular tissue after segmenting the skin. Upon determination of the accuracy of the algorithm with a phantom, it was applied to 137 breast CT volumes from 136 women. VGF was determined for each breast and the mean and range were determined. Pathology results with classification as benign, malignant, and hyperplasia were available for 132 women, and were used to investigate if the distributions of VGF varied with pathology.
The algorithm was accurate to within ±1.9% in determining the volume of an irregular shaped phantom. The study mean (± inter-breast SD) for the VGF was 0.172 ± 0.142 (range: 0.012-0.719). VGF was found to be negatively correlated with age, breast dimensions (chest-wall to nipple length, pectoralis to nipple length, and effective diameter at chest-wall), and total breast volume, and positively correlated with fibroglandular volume. Based on pathology, pairwise statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there was no significant difference in distributions of VGF without adjustment for age between malignant and nonmalignant breasts (p = 0.41). Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of VGF in increasing order of mammographic breast density indicated all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.002).
This study used a different clinical prototype breast CT system than that in previous studies to image subjects from a different geographical region, and used a different algorithm for analysis of image data. The mean VGF estimated from this study is within the range reported in previous studies, indicating that the choice of 50% glandular weight fraction to represent an average breast for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography needs revising. In the study, the distributions of VGF did not differ significantly with pathology. Purpose: To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients and for investigating the dependence of VGF on breast dimensions, race, and pathology. Methods: Image data from a clinical trial investigating the role of dedicated breast CT that enrolled 150 women were retrospectively analyzed to determine the VGF. The study was conducted in adherence to a protocol approved by the institutional human subjects review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants in the study were assigned BI-RADS® 4 or 5 as per the American College of Radiology assessment categories after standard diagnostic work-up and underwent dedicated breast CT exam prior to biopsy. A Gaussian-kernel based fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to partition the breast CT images into adipose and fibroglandular tissue after segmenting the skin. Upon determination of the accuracy of the algorithm with a phantom, it was applied to 137 breast CT volumes from 136 women. VGF was determined for each breast and the mean and range were determined. Pathology results with classification as benign, malignant, and hyperplasia were available for 132 women, and were used to investigate if the distributions of VGF varied with pathology. Results: The algorithm was accurate to within ±1.9% in determining the volume of an irregular shaped phantom. The study mean (± inter-breast SD) for the VGF was 0.172 ± 0.142 (range: 0.012–0.719). VGF was found to be negatively correlated with age, breast dimensions (chest-wall to nipple length, pectoralis to nipple length, and effective diameter at chest-wall), and total breast volume, and positively correlated with fibroglandular volume. Based on pathology, pairwise statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there was no significant difference in distributions of VGF without adjustment for age between malignant and nonmalignant breasts (p = 0.41). Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of VGF in increasing order of mammographic breast density indicated all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.002). Conclusions: This study used a different clinical prototype breast CT system than that in previous studies to image subjects from a different geographical region, and used a different algorithm for analysis of image data. The mean VGF estimated from this study is within the range reported in previous studies, indicating that the choice of 50% glandular weight fraction to represent an average breast for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography needs revising. In the study, the distributions of VGF did not differ significantly with pathology. Purpose: To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients and for investigating the dependence of VGF on breast dimensions, race, and pathology. Methods: Image data from a clinical trial investigating the role of dedicated breast CT that enrolled 150 women were retrospectively analyzed to determine the VGF. The study was conducted in adherence to a protocol approved by the institutional human subjects review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants in the study were assigned BI-RADS® 4 or 5 as per the American College of Radiology assessment categories after standard diagnostic work-up and underwent dedicated breast CT exam prior to biopsy. A Gaussian-kernel based fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to partition the breast CT images into adipose and fibroglandular tissue after segmenting the skin. Upon determination of the accuracy of the algorithm with a phantom, it was applied to 137 breast CT volumes from 136 women. VGF was determined for each breast and the mean and range were determined. Pathology results with classification as benign, malignant, and hyperplasia were available for 132 women, and were used to investigate if the distributions of VGF varied with pathology. Results: The algorithm was accurate to within ±1.9% in determining the volume of an irregular shaped phantom. The study mean (± inter-breast SD) for the VGF was 0.172 ± 0.142 (range: 0.012–0.719). VGF was found to be negatively correlated with age, breast dimensions (chest-wall to nipple length, pectoralis to nipple length, and effective diameter at chest-wall), and total breast volume, and positively correlated with fibroglandular volume. Based on pathology, pairwise statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there was no significant difference in distributions of VGF without adjustment for age between malignant and nonmalignant breasts (p = 0.41). Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of VGF in increasing order of mammographic breast density indicated all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.002). Conclusions: This study used a different clinical prototype breast CT system than that in previous studies to image subjects from a different geographical region, and used a different algorithm for analysis of image data. The mean VGF estimated from this study is within the range reported in previous studies, indicating that the choice of 50% glandular weight fraction to represent an average breast for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography needs revising. In the study, the distributions of VGF did not differ significantly with pathology. To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients and for investigating the dependence of VGF on breast dimensions, race, and pathology.PURPOSETo determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients and for investigating the dependence of VGF on breast dimensions, race, and pathology.Image data from a clinical trial investigating the role of dedicated breast CT that enrolled 150 women were retrospectively analyzed to determine the VGF. The study was conducted in adherence to a protocol approved by the institutional human subjects review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants in the study were assigned BI-RADS(®) 4 or 5 as per the American College of Radiology assessment categories after standard diagnostic work-up and underwent dedicated breast CT exam prior to biopsy. A Gaussian-kernel based fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to partition the breast CT images into adipose and fibroglandular tissue after segmenting the skin. Upon determination of the accuracy of the algorithm with a phantom, it was applied to 137 breast CT volumes from 136 women. VGF was determined for each breast and the mean and range were determined. Pathology results with classification as benign, malignant, and hyperplasia were available for 132 women, and were used to investigate if the distributions of VGF varied with pathology.METHODSImage data from a clinical trial investigating the role of dedicated breast CT that enrolled 150 women were retrospectively analyzed to determine the VGF. The study was conducted in adherence to a protocol approved by the institutional human subjects review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants in the study were assigned BI-RADS(®) 4 or 5 as per the American College of Radiology assessment categories after standard diagnostic work-up and underwent dedicated breast CT exam prior to biopsy. A Gaussian-kernel based fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to partition the breast CT images into adipose and fibroglandular tissue after segmenting the skin. Upon determination of the accuracy of the algorithm with a phantom, it was applied to 137 breast CT volumes from 136 women. VGF was determined for each breast and the mean and range were determined. Pathology results with classification as benign, malignant, and hyperplasia were available for 132 women, and were used to investigate if the distributions of VGF varied with pathology.The algorithm was accurate to within ±1.9% in determining the volume of an irregular shaped phantom. The study mean (± inter-breast SD) for the VGF was 0.172 ± 0.142 (range: 0.012-0.719). VGF was found to be negatively correlated with age, breast dimensions (chest-wall to nipple length, pectoralis to nipple length, and effective diameter at chest-wall), and total breast volume, and positively correlated with fibroglandular volume. Based on pathology, pairwise statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there was no significant difference in distributions of VGF without adjustment for age between malignant and nonmalignant breasts (p = 0.41). Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of VGF in increasing order of mammographic breast density indicated all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.002).RESULTSThe algorithm was accurate to within ±1.9% in determining the volume of an irregular shaped phantom. The study mean (± inter-breast SD) for the VGF was 0.172 ± 0.142 (range: 0.012-0.719). VGF was found to be negatively correlated with age, breast dimensions (chest-wall to nipple length, pectoralis to nipple length, and effective diameter at chest-wall), and total breast volume, and positively correlated with fibroglandular volume. Based on pathology, pairwise statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there was no significant difference in distributions of VGF without adjustment for age between malignant and nonmalignant breasts (p = 0.41). Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of VGF in increasing order of mammographic breast density indicated all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.002).This study used a different clinical prototype breast CT system than that in previous studies to image subjects from a different geographical region, and used a different algorithm for analysis of image data. The mean VGF estimated from this study is within the range reported in previous studies, indicating that the choice of 50% glandular weight fraction to represent an average breast for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography needs revising. In the study, the distributions of VGF did not differ significantly with pathology.CONCLUSIONSThis study used a different clinical prototype breast CT system than that in previous studies to image subjects from a different geographical region, and used a different algorithm for analysis of image data. The mean VGF estimated from this study is within the range reported in previous studies, indicating that the choice of 50% glandular weight fraction to represent an average breast for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography needs revising. In the study, the distributions of VGF did not differ significantly with pathology. Purpose: To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients and for investigating the dependence of VGF on breast dimensions, race, and pathology. Methods: Image data from a clinical trial investigating the role of dedicated breast CT that enrolled 150 women were retrospectively analyzed to determine the VGF. The study was conducted in adherence to a protocol approved by the institutional human subjects review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants in the study were assigned BI-RADS{sup Registered-Sign} 4 or 5 as per the American College of Radiology assessment categories after standard diagnostic work-up and underwent dedicated breast CT exam prior to biopsy. A Gaussian-kernel based fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to partition the breast CT images into adipose and fibroglandular tissue after segmenting the skin. Upon determination of the accuracy of the algorithm with a phantom, it was applied to 137 breast CT volumes from 136 women. VGF was determined for each breast and the mean and range were determined. Pathology results with classification as benign, malignant, and hyperplasia were available for 132 women, and were used to investigate if the distributions of VGF varied with pathology. Results: The algorithm was accurate to within {+-}1.9% in determining the volume of an irregular shaped phantom. The study mean ({+-} inter-breast SD) for the VGF was 0.172 {+-} 0.142 (range: 0.012-0.719). VGF was found to be negatively correlated with age, breast dimensions (chest-wall to nipple length, pectoralis to nipple length, and effective diameter at chest-wall), and total breast volume, and positively correlated with fibroglandular volume. Based on pathology, pairwise statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there was no significant difference in distributions of VGF without adjustment for age between malignant and nonmalignant breasts (p= 0.41). Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of VGF in increasing order of mammographic breast density indicated all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.002). Conclusions: This study used a different clinical prototype breast CT system than that in previous studies to image subjects from a different geographical region, and used a different algorithm for analysis of image data. The mean VGF estimated from this study is within the range reported in previous studies, indicating that the choice of 50% glandular weight fraction to represent an average breast for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography needs revising. In the study, the distributions of VGF did not differ significantly with pathology. |
| Author | Vedantham, Srinivasan Karellas, Andrew O’Connell, Avice M. Shi, Linxi |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Srinivasan surname: Vedantham fullname: Vedantham, Srinivasan email: srinivasan.vedantham@umassmed.edu organization: Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655 – sequence: 2 givenname: Linxi surname: Shi fullname: Shi, Linxi organization: Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655 – sequence: 3 givenname: Andrew surname: Karellas fullname: Karellas, Andrew organization: Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655 – sequence: 4 givenname: Avice M. surname: O’Connell fullname: O’Connell, Avice M. organization: Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642 |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23231281$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22096997$$D View this record in Osti.gov |
| BookMark | eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1URLctB_4AisSlIKUdfyTZcKiEFgpIrUBo75bjTLZGiR3sZKv997hNWspXD5YPfmbmnccHZM86i4S8oHBCKV2e0hNR5Blk8IQsmCh4KhiUe2QBUIqUCcj2yUEI3wEg5xk8I_uMM07Zki7It_dYG60GrJPKowpDslq_Tc5N5d2mVbYeW-WTrWvHDpMuvo8eO7RDSIxNVFIbtbEuDEYnvesjOxhnj8jTRrUBn8_3IVmff1ivPqUXXz5-Xr27SHVWFJDmSjcVNKJkNK9LzgQuUQhRllxg1kA8lcBGsCrXNSBg5OEW4EI3VPBD8mZqO9pe7a5V28rem075naQgb7xIKmcvET6b4H6sOqx1XMGrXwVOGfn7izVXcuO2kmdMlHkeG7yaGtxsK4M2A-or7axFPUgWdedlWUTqeB7j3Y8RwyA7EzS20SS6MUjK-JJCJlgW0ZcPE91HufuaCJxOgPYuBI-NjENvBceApv3nkq__qHhMSDqx16bF3f9Befl15mfb4S7Ffc3W-Qd8XzePwX8n-QmgJdag |
| CODEN | MPHYA6 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4931966 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2016_05_003 crossref_primary_10_3233_BSI_180176 crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_abb834 crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_58_12_4099 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nima_2015_10_110 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_13391 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13193_019_01031_3 crossref_primary_10_1117_1_JBO_21_9_091316 crossref_primary_10_1117_1_JMI_11_3_033501 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mri_2013_12_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radphyschem_2020_109110 crossref_primary_10_1093_rpd_ncv069 crossref_primary_10_2174_1573405619666230123155411 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_14688 crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_adb8f1 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4931958 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_13503 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13246_017_0583_x crossref_primary_10_1107_S1600577520001745 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4923169 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_13981 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12194_017_0404_7 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_12920 crossref_primary_10_1117_1_JMI_4_3_033502 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_12213 crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_59_15_4391 crossref_primary_10_1111_tbj_12327 crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_1_4_045202 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4793257 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4794503 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_021_08178_0 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4917083 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4955121 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2022_110509 crossref_primary_10_1093_rpd_ncw375 crossref_primary_10_1117_1_JMI_4_1_013504 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2018_04_009 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_77923_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tranon_2015_10_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_023_10399_4 crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2015141303 crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_61_19_R271 crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_58_22_7921 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2020_04_020 crossref_primary_10_3233_XST_17350 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6498_abc604 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_abfb16 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_16129 crossref_primary_10_3390_tomography9060160 crossref_primary_10_1111_tbj_13209 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_sult_2017_09_001 crossref_primary_10_3233_XST_200651 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_sult_2017_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4921069 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0187242 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_aa58c8 crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_2_3_035022 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1118/1.3688197 10.1118/1.2789407 10.1148/radiol.2461070309 10.1118/1.598851 10.1109/FUZZY.2005.1452429 10.1118/1.3646756 10.1364/JOSAA.1.000612 10.1088/0031‐9155/39/10/008 10.2214/ajr.126.6.1130 10.1002/1097‐0142(19800515)45:10<2550::AID‐CNCR2820451013>3.0.CO;2‐M 10.1016/S0031‐3203(01)00197‐2 10.1118/1.3250863 10.1158/1055‐9965.EPI‐09‐0107 10.1118/1.1668512 10.1023/B:NEPL.0000011135.19145.1b 10.1118/1.3457331 10.1093/jnci/87.9.670 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.315 10.1118/1.2964092 10.1186/bcr2942 10.2214/AJR.08.1017 10.1186/bcr2102 10.1118/1.2839439 10.1118/1.3567147 10.1016/j.acra.2005.08.035 10.1158/1055‐9965.EPI‐06‐0034 10.1109/42.232244 10.3174/ajnr.A1543 10.1109/42.668699 10.1088/0031‐9155/49/24/003 10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc3923 10.3233/XST‐2009‐0213 10.1118/1.2841938 10.1118/1.1636571 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine Copyright © 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: American Association of Physicists in Medicine – notice: 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine – notice: Copyright © 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 OTOTI 5PM ADTOC UNPAY |
| DOI | 10.1118/1.4765050 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic OSTI.GOV PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content Unpaywall |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: UNPAY name: Unpaywall url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/ sourceTypes: Open Access Repository |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Physics |
| EISSN | 2473-4209 0094-2405 |
| EndPage | 7328 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10.1118/1.4765050 PMC3524966 22096997 23231281 10_1118_1_4765050 MP5050 |
| Genre | article Clinical Trial Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NIH grantid: R01 CA128906 – fundername: NIH grantid: R21 CA134128 – fundername: NIH funderid: R21 CA134128 – fundername: NIH funderid: R01 CA128906 – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: R01 CA128906 – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: R21 CA134128 |
| GroupedDBID | --- --Z -DZ .GJ 0R~ 1OB 1OC 29M 2WC 33P 36B 3O- 4.4 476 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS AAHHS AANLZ AAQQT AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCUV ABEFU ABFTF ABJNI ABLJU ABQWH ABTAH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBEA ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACPOU ACSMX ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADKYN ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AENEX AEQDE AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AHBTC AIACR AIAGR AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMYDB ASPBG BFHJK C45 CS3 DCZOG DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBD EBS EJD EMB EMOBN F5P G8K HDBZQ HGLYW I-F KBYEO LATKE LEEKS LOXES LUTES LYRES MEWTI O9- OVD P2P P2W PALCI PHY RJQFR RNS ROL SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TN5 TWZ USG WOHZO WXSBR XJT ZGI ZVN ZXP ZY4 ZZTAW AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AAYCA ABDPE AFWVQ AITYG ALVPJ AAMMB AAYXX ADMLS AEFGJ AEYWJ AGHNM AGXDD AGYGG AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE CITATION LH4 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 AAJUZ AAPBV ABCVL ABPTK ADDAD AEUQT OTOTI 5PM ADTOC UNPAY |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5770-6acfb0f49216d9324e8e4449934e5f0e5fb4ef42b6cd0e0e6ac0e444934cf143 |
| IEDL.DBID | UNPAY |
| ISSN | 0094-2405 2473-4209 1522-8541 |
| IngestDate | Tue Aug 19 15:18:11 EDT 2025 Tue Sep 30 16:42:42 EDT 2025 Thu May 18 18:39:33 EDT 2023 Fri Sep 05 10:45:57 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:36:43 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 00:25:04 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:55:12 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:45:26 EST 2025 Sun Jul 14 10:05:20 EDT 2019 Fri Jun 21 00:28:32 EDT 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 12 |
| Keywords | fibroglandular volume breast CT radiation dose breast density glandular fraction |
| Language | English |
| License | 0094-2405/2012/39(12)/7317/12/$30.00 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5770-6acfb0f49216d9324e8e4449934e5f0e5fb4ef42b6cd0e0e6ac0e444934cf143 |
| Notes | Telephone: (508)856‐1241; Fax: (508)856‐6363. Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail srinivasan.vedantham@umassmed.edu ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: srinivasan.vedantham@umassmed.edu; Telephone: (508)856-1241; Fax: (508)856-6363. |
| OpenAccessLink | https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1118/1.4765050 |
| PMID | 23231281 |
| PQID | 1238105425 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 12 |
| ParticipantIDs | crossref_citationtrail_10_1118_1_4765050 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4765050 wiley_primary_10_1118_1_4765050_MP5050 proquest_miscellaneous_1238105425 scitation_primary_10_1118_1_4765050 unpaywall_primary_10_1118_1_4765050 osti_scitechconnect_22096997 pubmed_primary_23231281 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3524966 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | December 2012 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2012 text: December 2012 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Med Phys |
| PublicationYear | 2012 |
| Publisher | American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
| Publisher_xml | – name: American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
| References | Boyd, Byng, Jong, Fishell, Little, Miller, Lockwood, Tritchler, Yaffe (c3) 1995; 87 Vedantham, Shi, Karellas, Noo (c38) 2012; 39 Pham, Xu, Prince (c27) 2000; 2 Boyd, Martin, Gunasekara, Melnichouk, Maudsley, Peressotti, Yaffe, Minkin (c8) 2009; 18 Threatt, Norbeck, Ullman, Kummer, Roselle (c2) 1980; 45 Chang, Chen, Lin, Bahri, Yu, Mehta, Nie, Hsiang, Nalcioglu, Su (c13) 2011; 38 Huang, Boone, Yang, Packard, McKenney, Prionas, Lindfors, Yaffe (c23) 2011; 38 Huang, Boone, Yang, Kwan, Packard (c26) 2008; 35 Zhang, Chen (c31) 2003; 18 Glide-Hurst, Duric, Littrup (c9) 2007; 34 Benitez, Ning, Conover, Liu (c20) 2009; 17 Boone (c40) 1999; 213 Thacker, Glick (c36) 2004; 49 Kopans (c11) 2008; 246 McCormack, dos Santos Silva (c4) 2006; 15 Chen, Giger, Bick (c29) 2006; 13 Glide-Hurst, Duric, Littrup (c16) 2008; 35 Huo, Giger, Wolverton, Zhong, Cumming, Olopade (c7) 2000; 27 Brummer, Mersereau, Eisner, Lewine (c24) 1993; 12 Atkins, Mackiewich (c25) 1998; 17 Chueh, Wakhloo, Gounis (c34) 2009; 30 Sechopoulos, Feng, D’Orsi (c37) 2010; 37 Wu, Yang (c30) 2002; 35 Nelson, Cervino, Boone, Lindfors (c14) 2008; 35 Boone, Shah, Nelson (c35) 2004; 31 Feldkamp, Davis, Kress (c22) 1984; 1 Wolfe (c1) 1976; 126 Byng, Boyd, Fishell, Jong, Yaffe (c6) 1994; 39 Boyd, Martin, Yaffe, Minkin (c5) 2011; 13 O’Connell, Conover, Zhang, Seifert, Logan-Young, Lin, Sahler, Ning (c21) 2010; 195 Wei, Chan, Helvie, Roubidoux, Sahiner, Hadjiiski, Zhou, Paquerault, Chenevert, Goodsitt (c12) 2004; 31 Yaffe (c10) 2008; 10 Yaffe, Boone, Packard, Alonzo-Proulx, Huang, Peressotti, Al-Mayah, Brock (c15) 2009; 36 2010; 37 2000; 27 2006; 13 2004; 49 1980; 45 2002; 35 1976; 126 2006; 15 2008; 35 2011; 13 2008; 10 2000; 2 2005 2004 2003; 18 2012; 39 2008; 246 2002 2011; 38 2007; 34 1999 2009; 36 2004; 31 1993; 12 1998; 17 2009; 30 1984; 1 1995; 87 2010; 195 1999; 213 1994; 39 2009; 18 2009; 17 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_40_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_41_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 Bezdek J. C. (e_1_2_7_29_1) 2005 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 ACR (e_1_2_7_19_1) 1999 ACR (e_1_2_7_20_1) 2004 e_1_2_7_30_1 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_31_1 e_1_2_7_24_1 e_1_2_7_32_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_34_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_35_1 e_1_2_7_36_1 e_1_2_7_37_1 e_1_2_7_38_1 e_1_2_7_39_1 18072514 - Med Phys. 2007 Nov;34(11):4491-8 7378990 - Cancer. 1980 May 15;45(10):2550-6 20095256 - Med Phys. 2009 Dec;36(12):5437-43 22047360 - Med Phys. 2011 Nov;38(11):5961-8 18598375 - Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(3):209 7752271 - J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 May 3;87(9):670-5 18841850 - Med Phys. 2008 Sep;35(9):3988-97 15125012 - Med Phys. 2004 Apr;31(4):933-42 21626952 - Med Phys. 2011 Apr;38(4):2180-91 19644211 - J Xray Sci Technol. 2009;17(1):17-40 11701515 - Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2:315-37 20879571 - Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):4110-20 10659732 - Med Phys. 2000 Jan;27(1):4-12 19505909 - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jun;18(6):1754-62 19321626 - AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Jun;30(6):1159-64 16775176 - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jun;15(6):1159-69 20651210 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):496-509 22114898 - Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(6):223 18227535 - Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):348-53 10540637 - Radiology. 1999 Oct;213(1):23-37 22380385 - Med Phys. 2012 Mar;39(3):1530-41 15551535 - Phys Med Biol. 1994 Oct;39(10):1629-38 15000608 - Med Phys. 2004 Feb;31(2):226-35 9617911 - IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Feb;17(1):98-107 18404942 - Med Phys. 2008 Mar;35(3):1078-86 16399033 - Acad Radiol. 2006 Jan;13(1):63-72 18218403 - IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1993;12(2):153-66 179369 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976 Jun;126(6):1130-7 18491511 - Med Phys. 2008 Apr;35(4):1199-206 15724534 - Phys Med Biol. 2004 Dec 21;49(24):5433-44 |
| References_xml | – volume: 34 start-page: 4491 year: 2007 ident: c9 article-title: A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 246 start-page: 348 year: 2008 ident: c11 article-title: Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk publication-title: Radiology – volume: 126 start-page: 1130 year: 1976 ident: c1 article-title: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer publication-title: AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. – volume: 17 start-page: 98 year: 1998 ident: c25 article-title: Fully automatic segmentation of the brain in MRI publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging – volume: 31 start-page: 226 year: 2004 ident: c35 article-title: A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 35 start-page: 2267 year: 2002 ident: c30 article-title: Alternative c-means clustering algorithms publication-title: Pattern Recogn. – volume: 213 start-page: 23 year: 1999 ident: c40 article-title: Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy x-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment publication-title: Radiology – volume: 38 start-page: 5961 year: 2011 ident: c13 article-title: Comparison of breast density measured on MR images acquired using fat-suppressed versus nonfat-suppressed sequences publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 45 start-page: 2550 year: 1980 ident: c2 article-title: Association between mammographic parenchymal pattern classification and incidence of breast cancer publication-title: Cancer – volume: 35 start-page: 1199 year: 2008 ident: c26 article-title: The effect of skin thickness determined using breast CT on mammographic dosimetry publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 15 start-page: 1159 year: 2006 ident: c4 article-title: Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. – volume: 12 start-page: 153 year: 1993 ident: c24 article-title: Automatic detection of brain contours in MRI data sets publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging – volume: 18 start-page: 1754 year: 2009 ident: c8 article-title: Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: Evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. – volume: 31 start-page: 933 year: 2004 ident: c12 article-title: Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 13 start-page: 223 year: 2011 ident: c5 article-title: Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: Current understanding and future prospects publication-title: Breast Cancer Res. – volume: 37 start-page: 4110 year: 2010 ident: c37 article-title: Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 195 start-page: 496 year: 2010 ident: c21 article-title: Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality publication-title: AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. – volume: 39 start-page: 1629 year: 1994 ident: c6 article-title: The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 13 start-page: 63 year: 2006 ident: c29 article-title: A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images publication-title: Acad. Radiol. – volume: 2 start-page: 315 year: 2000 ident: c27 article-title: Current methods in medical image segmentation publication-title: Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. – volume: 35 start-page: 3988 year: 2008 ident: c16 article-title: Volumetric breast density evaluation from ultrasound tomography images publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 27 start-page: 4 year: 2000 ident: c7 article-title: Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: Feature selection publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 38 start-page: 2180 year: 2011 ident: c23 article-title: The characterization of breast anatomical metrics using dedicated breast CT publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 49 start-page: 5433 year: 2004 ident: c36 article-title: Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat-panel CT breast imaging publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 18 start-page: 155 year: 2003 ident: c31 article-title: Clustering incomplete data using kernel-based fuzzy C-means algorithm publication-title: Neural Process. Lett. – volume: 36 start-page: 5437 year: 2009 ident: c15 article-title: The myth of the 50-50 breast publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 87 start-page: 670 year: 1995 ident: c3 article-title: Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study publication-title: J. Natl. Cancer Inst. – volume: 1 start-page: 612 year: 1984 ident: c22 article-title: Practical cone-beam algorithm publication-title: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A – volume: 10 start-page: 209 year: 2008 ident: c10 article-title: Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density publication-title: Breast Cancer Res. – volume: 35 start-page: 1078 year: 2008 ident: c14 article-title: Classification of breast computed tomography data publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 17 start-page: 17 year: 2009 ident: c20 article-title: NPS characterization and evaluation of a cone beam CT breast imaging system publication-title: J. X-Ray Sci. Technol. – volume: 30 start-page: 1159 year: 2009 ident: c34 article-title: Neurovascular modeling: Small-batch manufacturing of silicone vascular replicas publication-title: AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. – volume: 39 start-page: 1530 year: 2012 ident: c38 article-title: Dedicated breast CT: Radiation dose for circle-plus-line trajectory publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 34 start-page: 4491 issue: 11 year: 2007 end-page: 4498 article-title: A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 195 start-page: 496 issue: 2 year: 2010 end-page: 509 article-title: Cone‐beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality publication-title: AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. – volume: 35 start-page: 1199 issue: 4 year: 2008 end-page: 1206 article-title: The effect of skin thickness determined using breast CT on mammographic dosimetry publication-title: Med. Phys. – year: 2005 – volume: 213 start-page: 23 issue: 1 year: 1999 end-page: 37 article-title: Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high‐energy x‐ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment publication-title: Radiology – volume: 39 start-page: 1629 issue: 10 year: 1994 end-page: 1638 article-title: The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 13 start-page: 63 issue: 1 year: 2006 end-page: 72 article-title: A fuzzy c‐means (FCM)‐based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR images publication-title: Acad. Radiol. – volume: 45 start-page: 2550 issue: 10 year: 1980 end-page: 2556 article-title: Association between mammographic parenchymal pattern classification and incidence of breast cancer publication-title: Cancer – volume: 126 start-page: 1130 issue: 6 year: 1976 end-page: 1137 article-title: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer publication-title: AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. – volume: 15 start-page: 1159 issue: 6 year: 2006 end-page: 1169 article-title: Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: A meta‐analysis publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. – volume: 35 start-page: 2267 issue: 10 year: 2002 end-page: 2278 article-title: Alternative c‐means clustering algorithms publication-title: Pattern Recogn. – volume: 31 start-page: 226 issue: 2 year: 2004 end-page: 235 article-title: A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant‐geometry cone‐beam breast computed tomography publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 17 start-page: 17 issue: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 40 article-title: NPS characterization and evaluation of a cone beam CT breast imaging system publication-title: J. X‐Ray Sci. Technol. – volume: 36 start-page: 5437 issue: 12 year: 2009 end-page: 5443 article-title: The myth of the 50‐50 breast publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 37 start-page: 4110 issue: 8 year: 2010 end-page: 4120 article-title: Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 27 start-page: 4 issue: 1 year: 2000 end-page: 12 article-title: Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: Feature selection publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 12 start-page: 153 issue: 2 year: 1993 end-page: 166 article-title: Automatic detection of brain contours in MRI data sets publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging – volume: 30 start-page: 1159 issue: 6 year: 2009 end-page: 1164 article-title: Neurovascular modeling: Small‐batch manufacturing of silicone vascular replicas publication-title: AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. – volume: 2 start-page: 315 year: 2000 end-page: 337 article-title: Current methods in medical image segmentation publication-title: Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. – volume: 49 start-page: 5433 issue: 24 year: 2004 end-page: 5444 article-title: Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat‐panel CT breast imaging publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 38 start-page: 5961 issue: 11 year: 2011 end-page: 5968 article-title: Comparison of breast density measured on MR images acquired using fat‐suppressed versus nonfat‐suppressed sequences publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 1 start-page: 612 issue: 6 year: 1984 end-page: 619 article-title: Practical cone‐beam algorithm publication-title: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A – volume: 18 start-page: 155 issue: 3 year: 2003 end-page: 162 article-title: Clustering incomplete data using kernel‐based fuzzy C‐means algorithm publication-title: Neural Process. Lett. – year: 2002 – start-page: 414 year: 2005 end-page: 419 article-title: Kernelized non‐Euclidean relational fuzzy c‐means algorithm – volume: 18 start-page: 1754 issue: 6 year: 2009 end-page: 1762 article-title: Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: Evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. – volume: 246 start-page: 348 issue: 2 year: 2008 end-page: 353 article-title: Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk publication-title: Radiology – volume: 31 start-page: 933 issue: 4 year: 2004 end-page: 942 article-title: Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 35 start-page: 1078 issue: 3 year: 2008 end-page: 1086 article-title: Classification of breast computed tomography data publication-title: Med. Phys. – year: 2004 – volume: 87 start-page: 670 issue: 9 year: 1995 end-page: 675 article-title: Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study publication-title: J. Natl. Cancer Inst. – volume: 38 start-page: 2180 issue: 4 year: 2011 end-page: 2191 article-title: The characterization of breast anatomical metrics using dedicated breast CT publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 17 start-page: 98 issue: 1 year: 1998 end-page: 107 article-title: Fully automatic segmentation of the brain in MRI publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging – volume: 10 start-page: 209 issue: 3 year: 2008 article-title: Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density publication-title: Breast Cancer Res. – volume: 35 start-page: 3988 issue: 9 year: 2008 end-page: 3997 article-title: Volumetric breast density evaluation from ultrasound tomography images publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 39 start-page: 1530 issue: 3 year: 2012 end-page: 1541 article-title: Dedicated breast CT: Radiation dose for circle‐plus‐line trajectory publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 13 start-page: 223 issue: 6 year: 2011 article-title: Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: Current understanding and future prospects publication-title: Breast Cancer Res. – year: 1999 – ident: e_1_2_7_39_1 doi: 10.1118/1.3688197 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1118/1.2789407 – ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2461070309 – volume-title: Fuzzy Models and Algorithms for Pattern Recognition and Image Processing year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1118/1.598851 – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 doi: 10.1109/FUZZY.2005.1452429 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1118/1.3646756 – volume-title: Mammography Quality Control Manual year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.1.000612 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1088/0031‐9155/39/10/008 – volume-title: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_40_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.2214/ajr.126.6.1130 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1002/1097‐0142(19800515)45:10<2550::AID‐CNCR2820451013>3.0.CO;2‐M – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 doi: 10.1016/S0031‐3203(01)00197‐2 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1118/1.3250863 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1158/1055‐9965.EPI‐09‐0107 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1118/1.1668512 – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1023/B:NEPL.0000011135.19145.1b – ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 doi: 10.1118/1.3457331 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.9.670 – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.315 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1118/1.2964092 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1186/bcr2942 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1017 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1186/bcr2102 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1118/1.2839439 – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 doi: 10.1118/1.3567147 – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.08.035 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1158/1055‐9965.EPI‐06‐0034 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1109/42.232244 – ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1543 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1109/42.668699 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 doi: 10.1088/0031‐9155/49/24/003 – ident: e_1_2_7_41_1 doi: 10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc3923 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.3233/XST‐2009‐0213 – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.1118/1.2841938 – ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 doi: 10.1118/1.1636571 – reference: 18841850 - Med Phys. 2008 Sep;35(9):3988-97 – reference: 19505909 - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jun;18(6):1754-62 – reference: 18491511 - Med Phys. 2008 Apr;35(4):1199-206 – reference: 18218403 - IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1993;12(2):153-66 – reference: 10659732 - Med Phys. 2000 Jan;27(1):4-12 – reference: 15724534 - Phys Med Biol. 2004 Dec 21;49(24):5433-44 – reference: 19321626 - AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Jun;30(6):1159-64 – reference: 16399033 - Acad Radiol. 2006 Jan;13(1):63-72 – reference: 16775176 - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jun;15(6):1159-69 – reference: 15551535 - Phys Med Biol. 1994 Oct;39(10):1629-38 – reference: 18598375 - Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(3):209 – reference: 21626952 - Med Phys. 2011 Apr;38(4):2180-91 – reference: 20651210 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):496-509 – reference: 22380385 - Med Phys. 2012 Mar;39(3):1530-41 – reference: 19644211 - J Xray Sci Technol. 2009;17(1):17-40 – reference: 10540637 - Radiology. 1999 Oct;213(1):23-37 – reference: 15000608 - Med Phys. 2004 Feb;31(2):226-35 – reference: 15125012 - Med Phys. 2004 Apr;31(4):933-42 – reference: 7378990 - Cancer. 1980 May 15;45(10):2550-6 – reference: 9617911 - IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Feb;17(1):98-107 – reference: 18404942 - Med Phys. 2008 Mar;35(3):1078-86 – reference: 18227535 - Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):348-53 – reference: 18072514 - Med Phys. 2007 Nov;34(11):4491-8 – reference: 20095256 - Med Phys. 2009 Dec;36(12):5437-43 – reference: 7752271 - J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 May 3;87(9):670-5 – reference: 11701515 - Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2:315-37 – reference: 20879571 - Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):4110-20 – reference: 22114898 - Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(6):223 – reference: 22047360 - Med Phys. 2011 Nov;38(11):5961-8 – reference: 179369 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976 Jun;126(6):1130-7 |
| SSID | ssj0006350 |
| Score | 2.33657 |
| Snippet | Purpose:
To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel... Purpose: To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high‐resolution flat‐panel... To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam... Purpose: To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel... |
| SourceID | unpaywall pubmedcentral osti proquest pubmed crossref wiley scitation |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 7317 |
| SubjectTerms | 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ALGORITHMS biological organs BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY BIOPSY breast CT breast density Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Cancer CAT SCANNING CHEST CLASSIFICATION CLINICAL TRIALS Computed tomography Computerised tomographs computerised tomography Cone beam computed tomography DATA ANALYSIS Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications DOSIMETRY Dosimetry/exposure assessment Female fibroglandular volume FUZZY LOGIC glandular fraction Humans Image analysis image classification Image data processing or generation, in general IMAGE PROCESSING image segmentation Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods MAMMARY GLANDS Mammography Mammography - methods medical image processing Medical image segmentation Medical imaging MONTE CARLO METHOD Monte Carlo methods Monte Carlo simulations Organ Size PATHOLOGY Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods PHANTOMS radiation dose RADIATION DOSES Radiation Imaging Physics RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Reproducibility of Results Segmentation Sensitivity and Specificity SKIN statistical testing Tissues Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods WOMEN |
| Title | Dedicated breast CT: Fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population |
| URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4765050 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1118%2F1.4765050 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23231281 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1238105425 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22096997 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3524966 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1118/1.4765050 |
| UnpaywallVersion | publishedVersion |
| Volume | 39 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVEBS databaseName: Inspec with Full Text customDbUrl: eissn: 2473-4209 dateEnd: 20241103 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0006350 issn: 0094-2405 databaseCode: ADMLS dateStart: 20070101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ebsco.com/products/research-databases/inspec-full-text providerName: EBSCOhost |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED-hVsBeBgwYgTGZDyFe2uXDjhPeqo1qQnSaoJPGk0kcW5tWkmpNh-Cv52ynmQJlQuIhH1JOdhL_zv5d7nIH8FqrlBVc6wFPZGRKmMWDnAW4o4gQnUYmBZSJtjiKD0_oh1N22tQ5Nf_CuPwQ7Qc3oxl2vjYKPi-0m-cbVU_2giHlSDGMzd6PGZLxHvRPjo5HX1zuSWp8B8xmTEWTK2G2jmVIOd5U6KdNnqFOO53VqVehlq1jnn8GUN7F9cq5zvF8Wc6zH9-z2axLeO2KNb4HX1fP6gJVLobLOh_Kn7-lgfyPl3EfNhs2S0YOfg_gliq34M6k8ddvwW0bYCoXD-HTgfUIIb8luYmDr8n-9B0ZY6eVrSJiomGJmyrJt-vvlgtyXpKMFC4gEHsh87bi2COYjt9P9w8HTT2HgWSco5WaSZ37mqZhEBfIG6lKFKVockVUMe3jllOlaZjHsvCVr1DetwIRlRp53WPolVWpngCJaBFpKXmkmKRBnmcsSLiK0Fb0dVEk2oO3q2EUq4ExJTdmwtk8iQhE87I8eNmKzl2Cj3VCO-YZhRllJc-kiUGStQgRRXGacg9erDAiUDuNyyUrVbVciMAwImTFIfNg22Gm7QW5bGT8mB7wDppaAZP5u3ulPD-zGcCRNVO0Uz141eLupptfI3VVXV5LCAQTSrW4vamtNxaGf5cQk2NzePpPzT2DDSSgoQsP2oFefblUz5Hk1fku9EcHk4-fdxuF_gX_Pko- |
| linkProvider | Unpaywall |
| linkToUnpaywall | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Zb9QwEB6hrTheOMoVKMgcQrzsksOOE96qwqpCalWhrVSeTOLYasWSrLpZEPx6ZuxsqsBSIfGQQ8rITuJv7G8ykxmAl9bkopLWjmWmEyphlo5LEeGOI0JsnlAKKIq2OEz3j_mHE3HS1Tmlf2F8foj-gxtphpuvScEXlfXzfKfq2ZtowiVSDLLZt1KBZHwEW8eHR7uffO5JTr4D4TKmosmVCVfHMuYSbyoO8y7P0KCdweo0alDLNjHPPwMor-N65V3neL6qF8WP78V8PiS8bsWa3oLP62f1gSpfJqu2nOifv6WB_I-XcRtudmyW7Xr43YErpt6Gawedv34brroAU728Cx_fOY8Q8ltWUhx8y_Zmb9kUO21cFRGKhmV-qmRfL75bLtlZzQpW-YBA7IUt-opj92A2fT_b2x939RzGWkiJVmqhbRlansdRWiFv5CYznKPJlXAjbIhbyY3lcZnqKjShQfnQCSRcW-R192FUN7V5CCzhVWK1lokRmkdlWYgokyZBWzG0VZXZAF6vh1GtB4ZKbsyVt3kyFanuZQXwvBdd-AQfm4R26BkVjbLRp5pikHSrYkRRmucygGdrjCjUTnK5FLVpVksVESNCVhyLAB54zPS9IJdNyI8ZgBygqRegzN_DK_XZqcsAjqyZo50awIsed5fd_Aapb835hYRCMKFUj9vL2nrlYPh3CXVwRIdH_9TcY7iBBDT24UE7MGrPV-YJkry2fNop8i-1e0iq |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dedicated+breast+CT%3A+fibroglandular+volume+measurements+in+a+diagnostic+population&rft.jtitle=Medical+physics+%28Lancaster%29&rft.au=Vedantham%2C+Srinivasan&rft.au=Shi%2C+Linxi&rft.au=Karellas%2C+Andrew&rft.au=O%27Connell%2C+Avice+M&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7317&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118%2F1.4765050&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon |