Dedicated breast CT: Fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population

Purpose: To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedical physics (Lancaster) Vol. 39; no. 12; pp. 7317 - 7328
Main Authors Vedantham, Srinivasan, Shi, Linxi, Karellas, Andrew, O’Connell, Avice M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Association of Physicists in Medicine 01.12.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0094-2405
2473-4209
1522-8541
2473-4209
0094-2405
DOI10.1118/1.4765050

Cover

Abstract Purpose: To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients and for investigating the dependence of VGF on breast dimensions, race, and pathology. Methods: Image data from a clinical trial investigating the role of dedicated breast CT that enrolled 150 women were retrospectively analyzed to determine the VGF. The study was conducted in adherence to a protocol approved by the institutional human subjects review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants in the study were assigned BI-RADS® 4 or 5 as per the American College of Radiology assessment categories after standard diagnostic work-up and underwent dedicated breast CT exam prior to biopsy. A Gaussian-kernel based fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to partition the breast CT images into adipose and fibroglandular tissue after segmenting the skin. Upon determination of the accuracy of the algorithm with a phantom, it was applied to 137 breast CT volumes from 136 women. VGF was determined for each breast and the mean and range were determined. Pathology results with classification as benign, malignant, and hyperplasia were available for 132 women, and were used to investigate if the distributions of VGF varied with pathology. Results: The algorithm was accurate to within ±1.9% in determining the volume of an irregular shaped phantom. The study mean (± inter-breast SD) for the VGF was 0.172 ± 0.142 (range: 0.012–0.719). VGF was found to be negatively correlated with age, breast dimensions (chest-wall to nipple length, pectoralis to nipple length, and effective diameter at chest-wall), and total breast volume, and positively correlated with fibroglandular volume. Based on pathology, pairwise statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there was no significant difference in distributions of VGF without adjustment for age between malignant and nonmalignant breasts (p = 0.41). Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of VGF in increasing order of mammographic breast density indicated all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.002). Conclusions: This study used a different clinical prototype breast CT system than that in previous studies to image subjects from a different geographical region, and used a different algorithm for analysis of image data. The mean VGF estimated from this study is within the range reported in previous studies, indicating that the choice of 50% glandular weight fraction to represent an average breast for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography needs revising. In the study, the distributions of VGF did not differ significantly with pathology.
AbstractList To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients and for investigating the dependence of VGF on breast dimensions, race, and pathology. Image data from a clinical trial investigating the role of dedicated breast CT that enrolled 150 women were retrospectively analyzed to determine the VGF. The study was conducted in adherence to a protocol approved by the institutional human subjects review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants in the study were assigned BI-RADS(®) 4 or 5 as per the American College of Radiology assessment categories after standard diagnostic work-up and underwent dedicated breast CT exam prior to biopsy. A Gaussian-kernel based fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to partition the breast CT images into adipose and fibroglandular tissue after segmenting the skin. Upon determination of the accuracy of the algorithm with a phantom, it was applied to 137 breast CT volumes from 136 women. VGF was determined for each breast and the mean and range were determined. Pathology results with classification as benign, malignant, and hyperplasia were available for 132 women, and were used to investigate if the distributions of VGF varied with pathology. The algorithm was accurate to within ±1.9% in determining the volume of an irregular shaped phantom. The study mean (± inter-breast SD) for the VGF was 0.172 ± 0.142 (range: 0.012-0.719). VGF was found to be negatively correlated with age, breast dimensions (chest-wall to nipple length, pectoralis to nipple length, and effective diameter at chest-wall), and total breast volume, and positively correlated with fibroglandular volume. Based on pathology, pairwise statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there was no significant difference in distributions of VGF without adjustment for age between malignant and nonmalignant breasts (p = 0.41). Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of VGF in increasing order of mammographic breast density indicated all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.002). This study used a different clinical prototype breast CT system than that in previous studies to image subjects from a different geographical region, and used a different algorithm for analysis of image data. The mean VGF estimated from this study is within the range reported in previous studies, indicating that the choice of 50% glandular weight fraction to represent an average breast for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography needs revising. In the study, the distributions of VGF did not differ significantly with pathology.
Purpose: To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients and for investigating the dependence of VGF on breast dimensions, race, and pathology. Methods: Image data from a clinical trial investigating the role of dedicated breast CT that enrolled 150 women were retrospectively analyzed to determine the VGF. The study was conducted in adherence to a protocol approved by the institutional human subjects review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants in the study were assigned BI-RADS® 4 or 5 as per the American College of Radiology assessment categories after standard diagnostic work-up and underwent dedicated breast CT exam prior to biopsy. A Gaussian-kernel based fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to partition the breast CT images into adipose and fibroglandular tissue after segmenting the skin. Upon determination of the accuracy of the algorithm with a phantom, it was applied to 137 breast CT volumes from 136 women. VGF was determined for each breast and the mean and range were determined. Pathology results with classification as benign, malignant, and hyperplasia were available for 132 women, and were used to investigate if the distributions of VGF varied with pathology. Results: The algorithm was accurate to within ±1.9% in determining the volume of an irregular shaped phantom. The study mean (± inter-breast SD) for the VGF was 0.172 ± 0.142 (range: 0.012–0.719). VGF was found to be negatively correlated with age, breast dimensions (chest-wall to nipple length, pectoralis to nipple length, and effective diameter at chest-wall), and total breast volume, and positively correlated with fibroglandular volume. Based on pathology, pairwise statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there was no significant difference in distributions of VGF without adjustment for age between malignant and nonmalignant breasts (p = 0.41). Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of VGF in increasing order of mammographic breast density indicated all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.002). Conclusions: This study used a different clinical prototype breast CT system than that in previous studies to image subjects from a different geographical region, and used a different algorithm for analysis of image data. The mean VGF estimated from this study is within the range reported in previous studies, indicating that the choice of 50% glandular weight fraction to represent an average breast for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography needs revising. In the study, the distributions of VGF did not differ significantly with pathology.
Purpose: To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients and for investigating the dependence of VGF on breast dimensions, race, and pathology. Methods: Image data from a clinical trial investigating the role of dedicated breast CT that enrolled 150 women were retrospectively analyzed to determine the VGF. The study was conducted in adherence to a protocol approved by the institutional human subjects review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants in the study were assigned BI-RADS® 4 or 5 as per the American College of Radiology assessment categories after standard diagnostic work-up and underwent dedicated breast CT exam prior to biopsy. A Gaussian-kernel based fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to partition the breast CT images into adipose and fibroglandular tissue after segmenting the skin. Upon determination of the accuracy of the algorithm with a phantom, it was applied to 137 breast CT volumes from 136 women. VGF was determined for each breast and the mean and range were determined. Pathology results with classification as benign, malignant, and hyperplasia were available for 132 women, and were used to investigate if the distributions of VGF varied with pathology. Results: The algorithm was accurate to within ±1.9% in determining the volume of an irregular shaped phantom. The study mean (± inter-breast SD) for the VGF was 0.172 ± 0.142 (range: 0.012–0.719). VGF was found to be negatively correlated with age, breast dimensions (chest-wall to nipple length, pectoralis to nipple length, and effective diameter at chest-wall), and total breast volume, and positively correlated with fibroglandular volume. Based on pathology, pairwise statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there was no significant difference in distributions of VGF without adjustment for age between malignant and nonmalignant breasts (p = 0.41). Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of VGF in increasing order of mammographic breast density indicated all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.002). Conclusions: This study used a different clinical prototype breast CT system than that in previous studies to image subjects from a different geographical region, and used a different algorithm for analysis of image data. The mean VGF estimated from this study is within the range reported in previous studies, indicating that the choice of 50% glandular weight fraction to represent an average breast for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography needs revising. In the study, the distributions of VGF did not differ significantly with pathology.
To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients and for investigating the dependence of VGF on breast dimensions, race, and pathology.PURPOSETo determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients and for investigating the dependence of VGF on breast dimensions, race, and pathology.Image data from a clinical trial investigating the role of dedicated breast CT that enrolled 150 women were retrospectively analyzed to determine the VGF. The study was conducted in adherence to a protocol approved by the institutional human subjects review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants in the study were assigned BI-RADS(®) 4 or 5 as per the American College of Radiology assessment categories after standard diagnostic work-up and underwent dedicated breast CT exam prior to biopsy. A Gaussian-kernel based fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to partition the breast CT images into adipose and fibroglandular tissue after segmenting the skin. Upon determination of the accuracy of the algorithm with a phantom, it was applied to 137 breast CT volumes from 136 women. VGF was determined for each breast and the mean and range were determined. Pathology results with classification as benign, malignant, and hyperplasia were available for 132 women, and were used to investigate if the distributions of VGF varied with pathology.METHODSImage data from a clinical trial investigating the role of dedicated breast CT that enrolled 150 women were retrospectively analyzed to determine the VGF. The study was conducted in adherence to a protocol approved by the institutional human subjects review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants in the study were assigned BI-RADS(®) 4 or 5 as per the American College of Radiology assessment categories after standard diagnostic work-up and underwent dedicated breast CT exam prior to biopsy. A Gaussian-kernel based fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to partition the breast CT images into adipose and fibroglandular tissue after segmenting the skin. Upon determination of the accuracy of the algorithm with a phantom, it was applied to 137 breast CT volumes from 136 women. VGF was determined for each breast and the mean and range were determined. Pathology results with classification as benign, malignant, and hyperplasia were available for 132 women, and were used to investigate if the distributions of VGF varied with pathology.The algorithm was accurate to within ±1.9% in determining the volume of an irregular shaped phantom. The study mean (± inter-breast SD) for the VGF was 0.172 ± 0.142 (range: 0.012-0.719). VGF was found to be negatively correlated with age, breast dimensions (chest-wall to nipple length, pectoralis to nipple length, and effective diameter at chest-wall), and total breast volume, and positively correlated with fibroglandular volume. Based on pathology, pairwise statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there was no significant difference in distributions of VGF without adjustment for age between malignant and nonmalignant breasts (p = 0.41). Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of VGF in increasing order of mammographic breast density indicated all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.002).RESULTSThe algorithm was accurate to within ±1.9% in determining the volume of an irregular shaped phantom. The study mean (± inter-breast SD) for the VGF was 0.172 ± 0.142 (range: 0.012-0.719). VGF was found to be negatively correlated with age, breast dimensions (chest-wall to nipple length, pectoralis to nipple length, and effective diameter at chest-wall), and total breast volume, and positively correlated with fibroglandular volume. Based on pathology, pairwise statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there was no significant difference in distributions of VGF without adjustment for age between malignant and nonmalignant breasts (p = 0.41). Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of VGF in increasing order of mammographic breast density indicated all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.002).This study used a different clinical prototype breast CT system than that in previous studies to image subjects from a different geographical region, and used a different algorithm for analysis of image data. The mean VGF estimated from this study is within the range reported in previous studies, indicating that the choice of 50% glandular weight fraction to represent an average breast for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography needs revising. In the study, the distributions of VGF did not differ significantly with pathology.CONCLUSIONSThis study used a different clinical prototype breast CT system than that in previous studies to image subjects from a different geographical region, and used a different algorithm for analysis of image data. The mean VGF estimated from this study is within the range reported in previous studies, indicating that the choice of 50% glandular weight fraction to represent an average breast for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography needs revising. In the study, the distributions of VGF did not differ significantly with pathology.
Purpose: To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT system. This information is important for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients and for investigating the dependence of VGF on breast dimensions, race, and pathology. Methods: Image data from a clinical trial investigating the role of dedicated breast CT that enrolled 150 women were retrospectively analyzed to determine the VGF. The study was conducted in adherence to a protocol approved by the institutional human subjects review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants in the study were assigned BI-RADS{sup Registered-Sign} 4 or 5 as per the American College of Radiology assessment categories after standard diagnostic work-up and underwent dedicated breast CT exam prior to biopsy. A Gaussian-kernel based fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to partition the breast CT images into adipose and fibroglandular tissue after segmenting the skin. Upon determination of the accuracy of the algorithm with a phantom, it was applied to 137 breast CT volumes from 136 women. VGF was determined for each breast and the mean and range were determined. Pathology results with classification as benign, malignant, and hyperplasia were available for 132 women, and were used to investigate if the distributions of VGF varied with pathology. Results: The algorithm was accurate to within {+-}1.9% in determining the volume of an irregular shaped phantom. The study mean ({+-} inter-breast SD) for the VGF was 0.172 {+-} 0.142 (range: 0.012-0.719). VGF was found to be negatively correlated with age, breast dimensions (chest-wall to nipple length, pectoralis to nipple length, and effective diameter at chest-wall), and total breast volume, and positively correlated with fibroglandular volume. Based on pathology, pairwise statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there was no significant difference in distributions of VGF without adjustment for age between malignant and nonmalignant breasts (p= 0.41). Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of VGF in increasing order of mammographic breast density indicated all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.002). Conclusions: This study used a different clinical prototype breast CT system than that in previous studies to image subjects from a different geographical region, and used a different algorithm for analysis of image data. The mean VGF estimated from this study is within the range reported in previous studies, indicating that the choice of 50% glandular weight fraction to represent an average breast for Monte Carlo-based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography needs revising. In the study, the distributions of VGF did not differ significantly with pathology.
Author Vedantham, Srinivasan
Karellas, Andrew
O’Connell, Avice M.
Shi, Linxi
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Srinivasan
  surname: Vedantham
  fullname: Vedantham, Srinivasan
  email: srinivasan.vedantham@umassmed.edu
  organization: Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Linxi
  surname: Shi
  fullname: Shi, Linxi
  organization: Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Andrew
  surname: Karellas
  fullname: Karellas, Andrew
  organization: Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Avice M.
  surname: O’Connell
  fullname: O’Connell, Avice M.
  organization: Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23231281$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22096997$$D View this record in Osti.gov
BookMark eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1URLctB_4AisSlIKUdfyTZcKiEFgpIrUBo75bjTLZGiR3sZKv997hNWspXD5YPfmbmnccHZM86i4S8oHBCKV2e0hNR5Blk8IQsmCh4KhiUe2QBUIqUCcj2yUEI3wEg5xk8I_uMM07Zki7It_dYG60GrJPKowpDslq_Tc5N5d2mVbYeW-WTrWvHDpMuvo8eO7RDSIxNVFIbtbEuDEYnvesjOxhnj8jTRrUBn8_3IVmff1ivPqUXXz5-Xr27SHVWFJDmSjcVNKJkNK9LzgQuUQhRllxg1kA8lcBGsCrXNSBg5OEW4EI3VPBD8mZqO9pe7a5V28rem075naQgb7xIKmcvET6b4H6sOqx1XMGrXwVOGfn7izVXcuO2kmdMlHkeG7yaGtxsK4M2A-or7axFPUgWdedlWUTqeB7j3Y8RwyA7EzS20SS6MUjK-JJCJlgW0ZcPE91HufuaCJxOgPYuBI-NjENvBceApv3nkq__qHhMSDqx16bF3f9Befl15mfb4S7Ffc3W-Qd8XzePwX8n-QmgJdag
CODEN MPHYA6
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4931966
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2016_05_003
crossref_primary_10_3233_BSI_180176
crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_abb834
crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_58_12_4099
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nima_2015_10_110
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_13391
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13193_019_01031_3
crossref_primary_10_1117_1_JBO_21_9_091316
crossref_primary_10_1117_1_JMI_11_3_033501
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mri_2013_12_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radphyschem_2020_109110
crossref_primary_10_1093_rpd_ncv069
crossref_primary_10_2174_1573405619666230123155411
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_14688
crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_adb8f1
crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4931958
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_13503
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13246_017_0583_x
crossref_primary_10_1107_S1600577520001745
crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4923169
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_13981
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12194_017_0404_7
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_12920
crossref_primary_10_1117_1_JMI_4_3_033502
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_12213
crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_59_15_4391
crossref_primary_10_1111_tbj_12327
crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_1_4_045202
crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4793257
crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4794503
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_021_08178_0
crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4917083
crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4955121
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2022_110509
crossref_primary_10_1093_rpd_ncw375
crossref_primary_10_1117_1_JMI_4_1_013504
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2018_04_009
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_77923_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tranon_2015_10_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_023_10399_4
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2015141303
crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_61_19_R271
crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_58_22_7921
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2020_04_020
crossref_primary_10_3233_XST_17350
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6498_abc604
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_abfb16
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_16129
crossref_primary_10_3390_tomography9060160
crossref_primary_10_1111_tbj_13209
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_sult_2017_09_001
crossref_primary_10_3233_XST_200651
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_sult_2017_09_004
crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4921069
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0187242
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_aa58c8
crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_2_3_035022
Cites_doi 10.1118/1.3688197
10.1118/1.2789407
10.1148/radiol.2461070309
10.1118/1.598851
10.1109/FUZZY.2005.1452429
10.1118/1.3646756
10.1364/JOSAA.1.000612
10.1088/0031‐9155/39/10/008
10.2214/ajr.126.6.1130
10.1002/1097‐0142(19800515)45:10<2550::AID‐CNCR2820451013>3.0.CO;2‐M
10.1016/S0031‐3203(01)00197‐2
10.1118/1.3250863
10.1158/1055‐9965.EPI‐09‐0107
10.1118/1.1668512
10.1023/B:NEPL.0000011135.19145.1b
10.1118/1.3457331
10.1093/jnci/87.9.670
10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.315
10.1118/1.2964092
10.1186/bcr2942
10.2214/AJR.08.1017
10.1186/bcr2102
10.1118/1.2839439
10.1118/1.3567147
10.1016/j.acra.2005.08.035
10.1158/1055‐9965.EPI‐06‐0034
10.1109/42.232244
10.3174/ajnr.A1543
10.1109/42.668699
10.1088/0031‐9155/49/24/003
10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc3923
10.3233/XST‐2009‐0213
10.1118/1.2841938
10.1118/1.1636571
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright American Association of Physicists in Medicine
2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
Copyright_xml – notice: American Association of Physicists in Medicine
– notice: 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
– notice: Copyright © 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
OTOTI
5PM
ADTOC
UNPAY
DOI 10.1118/1.4765050
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
OSTI.GOV
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content
Unpaywall
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE


MEDLINE - Academic


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: UNPAY
  name: Unpaywall
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Access Repository
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Physics
EISSN 2473-4209
0094-2405
EndPage 7328
ExternalDocumentID 10.1118/1.4765050
PMC3524966
22096997
23231281
10_1118_1_4765050
MP5050
Genre article
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NIH
  grantid: R01 CA128906
– fundername: NIH
  grantid: R21 CA134128
– fundername: NIH
  funderid: R21 CA134128
– fundername: NIH
  funderid: R01 CA128906
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 CA128906
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: R21 CA134128
GroupedDBID ---
--Z
-DZ
.GJ
0R~
1OB
1OC
29M
2WC
33P
36B
3O-
4.4
476
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAQQT
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABEFU
ABFTF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABQWH
ABTAH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBEA
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACPOU
ACSMX
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADKYN
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AHBTC
AIACR
AIAGR
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMYDB
ASPBG
BFHJK
C45
CS3
DCZOG
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
F5P
G8K
HDBZQ
HGLYW
I-F
KBYEO
LATKE
LEEKS
LOXES
LUTES
LYRES
MEWTI
O9-
OVD
P2P
P2W
PALCI
PHY
RJQFR
RNS
ROL
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TN5
TWZ
USG
WOHZO
WXSBR
XJT
ZGI
ZVN
ZXP
ZY4
ZZTAW
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AAYCA
ABDPE
AFWVQ
AITYG
ALVPJ
AAMMB
AAYXX
ADMLS
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGXDD
AGYGG
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
CITATION
LH4
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
AAJUZ
AAPBV
ABCVL
ABPTK
ADDAD
AEUQT
OTOTI
5PM
ADTOC
UNPAY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5770-6acfb0f49216d9324e8e4449934e5f0e5fb4ef42b6cd0e0e6ac0e444934cf143
IEDL.DBID UNPAY
ISSN 0094-2405
2473-4209
1522-8541
IngestDate Tue Aug 19 15:18:11 EDT 2025
Tue Sep 30 16:42:42 EDT 2025
Thu May 18 18:39:33 EDT 2023
Fri Sep 05 10:45:57 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:36:43 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 00:25:04 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:55:12 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:45:26 EST 2025
Sun Jul 14 10:05:20 EDT 2019
Fri Jun 21 00:28:32 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 12
Keywords fibroglandular volume
breast CT
radiation dose
breast density
glandular fraction
Language English
License 0094-2405/2012/39(12)/7317/12/$30.00
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5770-6acfb0f49216d9324e8e4449934e5f0e5fb4ef42b6cd0e0e6ac0e444934cf143
Notes Telephone: (508)856‐1241; Fax: (508)856‐6363.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail
srinivasan.vedantham@umassmed.edu
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: srinivasan.vedantham@umassmed.edu; Telephone: (508)856-1241; Fax: (508)856-6363.
OpenAccessLink https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1118/1.4765050
PMID 23231281
PQID 1238105425
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs crossref_citationtrail_10_1118_1_4765050
crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4765050
wiley_primary_10_1118_1_4765050_MP5050
proquest_miscellaneous_1238105425
scitation_primary_10_1118_1_4765050
unpaywall_primary_10_1118_1_4765050
osti_scitechconnect_22096997
pubmed_primary_23231281
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3524966
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate December 2012
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2012
  text: December 2012
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Medical physics (Lancaster)
PublicationTitleAlternate Med Phys
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher American Association of Physicists in Medicine
Publisher_xml – name: American Association of Physicists in Medicine
References Boyd, Byng, Jong, Fishell, Little, Miller, Lockwood, Tritchler, Yaffe (c3) 1995; 87
Vedantham, Shi, Karellas, Noo (c38) 2012; 39
Pham, Xu, Prince (c27) 2000; 2
Boyd, Martin, Gunasekara, Melnichouk, Maudsley, Peressotti, Yaffe, Minkin (c8) 2009; 18
Threatt, Norbeck, Ullman, Kummer, Roselle (c2) 1980; 45
Chang, Chen, Lin, Bahri, Yu, Mehta, Nie, Hsiang, Nalcioglu, Su (c13) 2011; 38
Huang, Boone, Yang, Packard, McKenney, Prionas, Lindfors, Yaffe (c23) 2011; 38
Huang, Boone, Yang, Kwan, Packard (c26) 2008; 35
Zhang, Chen (c31) 2003; 18
Glide-Hurst, Duric, Littrup (c9) 2007; 34
Benitez, Ning, Conover, Liu (c20) 2009; 17
Boone (c40) 1999; 213
Thacker, Glick (c36) 2004; 49
Kopans (c11) 2008; 246
McCormack, dos Santos Silva (c4) 2006; 15
Chen, Giger, Bick (c29) 2006; 13
Glide-Hurst, Duric, Littrup (c16) 2008; 35
Huo, Giger, Wolverton, Zhong, Cumming, Olopade (c7) 2000; 27
Brummer, Mersereau, Eisner, Lewine (c24) 1993; 12
Atkins, Mackiewich (c25) 1998; 17
Chueh, Wakhloo, Gounis (c34) 2009; 30
Sechopoulos, Feng, D’Orsi (c37) 2010; 37
Wu, Yang (c30) 2002; 35
Nelson, Cervino, Boone, Lindfors (c14) 2008; 35
Boone, Shah, Nelson (c35) 2004; 31
Feldkamp, Davis, Kress (c22) 1984; 1
Wolfe (c1) 1976; 126
Byng, Boyd, Fishell, Jong, Yaffe (c6) 1994; 39
Boyd, Martin, Yaffe, Minkin (c5) 2011; 13
O’Connell, Conover, Zhang, Seifert, Logan-Young, Lin, Sahler, Ning (c21) 2010; 195
Wei, Chan, Helvie, Roubidoux, Sahiner, Hadjiiski, Zhou, Paquerault, Chenevert, Goodsitt (c12) 2004; 31
Yaffe (c10) 2008; 10
Yaffe, Boone, Packard, Alonzo-Proulx, Huang, Peressotti, Al-Mayah, Brock (c15) 2009; 36
2010; 37
2000; 27
2006; 13
2004; 49
1980; 45
2002; 35
1976; 126
2006; 15
2008; 35
2011; 13
2008; 10
2000; 2
2005
2004
2003; 18
2012; 39
2008; 246
2002
2011; 38
2007; 34
1999
2009; 36
2004; 31
1993; 12
1998; 17
2009; 30
1984; 1
1995; 87
2010; 195
1999; 213
1994; 39
2009; 18
2009; 17
e_1_2_7_6_1
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_40_1
e_1_2_7_2_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_41_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_26_1
Bezdek J. C. (e_1_2_7_29_1) 2005
e_1_2_7_27_1
e_1_2_7_28_1
ACR (e_1_2_7_19_1) 1999
ACR (e_1_2_7_20_1) 2004
e_1_2_7_30_1
e_1_2_7_25_1
e_1_2_7_31_1
e_1_2_7_24_1
e_1_2_7_32_1
e_1_2_7_23_1
e_1_2_7_33_1
e_1_2_7_22_1
e_1_2_7_34_1
e_1_2_7_21_1
e_1_2_7_35_1
e_1_2_7_36_1
e_1_2_7_37_1
e_1_2_7_38_1
e_1_2_7_39_1
18072514 - Med Phys. 2007 Nov;34(11):4491-8
7378990 - Cancer. 1980 May 15;45(10):2550-6
20095256 - Med Phys. 2009 Dec;36(12):5437-43
22047360 - Med Phys. 2011 Nov;38(11):5961-8
18598375 - Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(3):209
7752271 - J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 May 3;87(9):670-5
18841850 - Med Phys. 2008 Sep;35(9):3988-97
15125012 - Med Phys. 2004 Apr;31(4):933-42
21626952 - Med Phys. 2011 Apr;38(4):2180-91
19644211 - J Xray Sci Technol. 2009;17(1):17-40
11701515 - Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2:315-37
20879571 - Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):4110-20
10659732 - Med Phys. 2000 Jan;27(1):4-12
19505909 - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jun;18(6):1754-62
19321626 - AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Jun;30(6):1159-64
16775176 - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jun;15(6):1159-69
20651210 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):496-509
22114898 - Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(6):223
18227535 - Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):348-53
10540637 - Radiology. 1999 Oct;213(1):23-37
22380385 - Med Phys. 2012 Mar;39(3):1530-41
15551535 - Phys Med Biol. 1994 Oct;39(10):1629-38
15000608 - Med Phys. 2004 Feb;31(2):226-35
9617911 - IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Feb;17(1):98-107
18404942 - Med Phys. 2008 Mar;35(3):1078-86
16399033 - Acad Radiol. 2006 Jan;13(1):63-72
18218403 - IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1993;12(2):153-66
179369 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976 Jun;126(6):1130-7
18491511 - Med Phys. 2008 Apr;35(4):1199-206
15724534 - Phys Med Biol. 2004 Dec 21;49(24):5433-44
References_xml – volume: 34
  start-page: 4491
  year: 2007
  ident: c9
  article-title: A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 246
  start-page: 348
  year: 2008
  ident: c11
  article-title: Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk
  publication-title: Radiology
– volume: 126
  start-page: 1130
  year: 1976
  ident: c1
  article-title: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer
  publication-title: AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol.
– volume: 17
  start-page: 98
  year: 1998
  ident: c25
  article-title: Fully automatic segmentation of the brain in MRI
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
– volume: 31
  start-page: 226
  year: 2004
  ident: c35
  article-title: A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2267
  year: 2002
  ident: c30
  article-title: Alternative c-means clustering algorithms
  publication-title: Pattern Recogn.
– volume: 213
  start-page: 23
  year: 1999
  ident: c40
  article-title: Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy x-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment
  publication-title: Radiology
– volume: 38
  start-page: 5961
  year: 2011
  ident: c13
  article-title: Comparison of breast density measured on MR images acquired using fat-suppressed versus nonfat-suppressed sequences
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 45
  start-page: 2550
  year: 1980
  ident: c2
  article-title: Association between mammographic parenchymal pattern classification and incidence of breast cancer
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1199
  year: 2008
  ident: c26
  article-title: The effect of skin thickness determined using breast CT on mammographic dosimetry
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1159
  year: 2006
  ident: c4
  article-title: Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
– volume: 12
  start-page: 153
  year: 1993
  ident: c24
  article-title: Automatic detection of brain contours in MRI data sets
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1754
  year: 2009
  ident: c8
  article-title: Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: Evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
– volume: 31
  start-page: 933
  year: 2004
  ident: c12
  article-title: Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 223
  year: 2011
  ident: c5
  article-title: Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: Current understanding and future prospects
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res.
– volume: 37
  start-page: 4110
  year: 2010
  ident: c37
  article-title: Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 195
  start-page: 496
  year: 2010
  ident: c21
  article-title: Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality
  publication-title: AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol.
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1629
  year: 1994
  ident: c6
  article-title: The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities
  publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 63
  year: 2006
  ident: c29
  article-title: A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images
  publication-title: Acad. Radiol.
– volume: 2
  start-page: 315
  year: 2000
  ident: c27
  article-title: Current methods in medical image segmentation
  publication-title: Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 3988
  year: 2008
  ident: c16
  article-title: Volumetric breast density evaluation from ultrasound tomography images
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 27
  start-page: 4
  year: 2000
  ident: c7
  article-title: Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: Feature selection
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 38
  start-page: 2180
  year: 2011
  ident: c23
  article-title: The characterization of breast anatomical metrics using dedicated breast CT
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 49
  start-page: 5433
  year: 2004
  ident: c36
  article-title: Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat-panel CT breast imaging
  publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol.
– volume: 18
  start-page: 155
  year: 2003
  ident: c31
  article-title: Clustering incomplete data using kernel-based fuzzy C-means algorithm
  publication-title: Neural Process. Lett.
– volume: 36
  start-page: 5437
  year: 2009
  ident: c15
  article-title: The myth of the 50-50 breast
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 87
  start-page: 670
  year: 1995
  ident: c3
  article-title: Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study
  publication-title: J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
– volume: 1
  start-page: 612
  year: 1984
  ident: c22
  article-title: Practical cone-beam algorithm
  publication-title: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
– volume: 10
  start-page: 209
  year: 2008
  ident: c10
  article-title: Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1078
  year: 2008
  ident: c14
  article-title: Classification of breast computed tomography data
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 17
  start-page: 17
  year: 2009
  ident: c20
  article-title: NPS characterization and evaluation of a cone beam CT breast imaging system
  publication-title: J. X-Ray Sci. Technol.
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1159
  year: 2009
  ident: c34
  article-title: Neurovascular modeling: Small-batch manufacturing of silicone vascular replicas
  publication-title: AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1530
  year: 2012
  ident: c38
  article-title: Dedicated breast CT: Radiation dose for circle-plus-line trajectory
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 34
  start-page: 4491
  issue: 11
  year: 2007
  end-page: 4498
  article-title: A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 195
  start-page: 496
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  end-page: 509
  article-title: Cone‐beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality
  publication-title: AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1199
  issue: 4
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1206
  article-title: The effect of skin thickness determined using breast CT on mammographic dosimetry
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– year: 2005
– volume: 213
  start-page: 23
  issue: 1
  year: 1999
  end-page: 37
  article-title: Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high‐energy x‐ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment
  publication-title: Radiology
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1629
  issue: 10
  year: 1994
  end-page: 1638
  article-title: The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities
  publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 63
  issue: 1
  year: 2006
  end-page: 72
  article-title: A fuzzy c‐means (FCM)‐based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR images
  publication-title: Acad. Radiol.
– volume: 45
  start-page: 2550
  issue: 10
  year: 1980
  end-page: 2556
  article-title: Association between mammographic parenchymal pattern classification and incidence of breast cancer
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 126
  start-page: 1130
  issue: 6
  year: 1976
  end-page: 1137
  article-title: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer
  publication-title: AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol.
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1159
  issue: 6
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1169
  article-title: Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: A meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2267
  issue: 10
  year: 2002
  end-page: 2278
  article-title: Alternative c‐means clustering algorithms
  publication-title: Pattern Recogn.
– volume: 31
  start-page: 226
  issue: 2
  year: 2004
  end-page: 235
  article-title: A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant‐geometry cone‐beam breast computed tomography
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 17
  start-page: 17
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  end-page: 40
  article-title: NPS characterization and evaluation of a cone beam CT breast imaging system
  publication-title: J. X‐Ray Sci. Technol.
– volume: 36
  start-page: 5437
  issue: 12
  year: 2009
  end-page: 5443
  article-title: The myth of the 50‐50 breast
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 37
  start-page: 4110
  issue: 8
  year: 2010
  end-page: 4120
  article-title: Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 27
  start-page: 4
  issue: 1
  year: 2000
  end-page: 12
  article-title: Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: Feature selection
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 12
  start-page: 153
  issue: 2
  year: 1993
  end-page: 166
  article-title: Automatic detection of brain contours in MRI data sets
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1159
  issue: 6
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1164
  article-title: Neurovascular modeling: Small‐batch manufacturing of silicone vascular replicas
  publication-title: AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.
– volume: 2
  start-page: 315
  year: 2000
  end-page: 337
  article-title: Current methods in medical image segmentation
  publication-title: Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng.
– volume: 49
  start-page: 5433
  issue: 24
  year: 2004
  end-page: 5444
  article-title: Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat‐panel CT breast imaging
  publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol.
– volume: 38
  start-page: 5961
  issue: 11
  year: 2011
  end-page: 5968
  article-title: Comparison of breast density measured on MR images acquired using fat‐suppressed versus nonfat‐suppressed sequences
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 1
  start-page: 612
  issue: 6
  year: 1984
  end-page: 619
  article-title: Practical cone‐beam algorithm
  publication-title: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
– volume: 18
  start-page: 155
  issue: 3
  year: 2003
  end-page: 162
  article-title: Clustering incomplete data using kernel‐based fuzzy C‐means algorithm
  publication-title: Neural Process. Lett.
– year: 2002
– start-page: 414
  year: 2005
  end-page: 419
  article-title: Kernelized non‐Euclidean relational fuzzy c‐means algorithm
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1754
  issue: 6
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1762
  article-title: Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: Evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
– volume: 246
  start-page: 348
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  end-page: 353
  article-title: Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk
  publication-title: Radiology
– volume: 31
  start-page: 933
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  end-page: 942
  article-title: Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1078
  issue: 3
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1086
  article-title: Classification of breast computed tomography data
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– year: 2004
– volume: 87
  start-page: 670
  issue: 9
  year: 1995
  end-page: 675
  article-title: Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study
  publication-title: J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
– volume: 38
  start-page: 2180
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  end-page: 2191
  article-title: The characterization of breast anatomical metrics using dedicated breast CT
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 17
  start-page: 98
  issue: 1
  year: 1998
  end-page: 107
  article-title: Fully automatic segmentation of the brain in MRI
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
– volume: 10
  start-page: 209
  issue: 3
  year: 2008
  article-title: Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 3988
  issue: 9
  year: 2008
  end-page: 3997
  article-title: Volumetric breast density evaluation from ultrasound tomography images
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1530
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1541
  article-title: Dedicated breast CT: Radiation dose for circle‐plus‐line trajectory
  publication-title: Med. Phys.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 223
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  article-title: Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: Current understanding and future prospects
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res.
– year: 1999
– ident: e_1_2_7_39_1
  doi: 10.1118/1.3688197
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1118/1.2789407
– ident: e_1_2_7_34_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2461070309
– volume-title: Fuzzy Models and Algorithms for Pattern Recognition and Image Processing
  year: 2005
  ident: e_1_2_7_29_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1118/1.598851
– ident: e_1_2_7_33_1
  doi: 10.1109/FUZZY.2005.1452429
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.1118/1.3646756
– volume-title: Mammography Quality Control Manual
  year: 1999
  ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.1.000612
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1088/0031‐9155/39/10/008
– volume-title: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_40_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.126.6.1130
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1002/1097‐0142(19800515)45:10<2550::AID‐CNCR2820451013>3.0.CO;2‐M
– ident: e_1_2_7_31_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0031‐3203(01)00197‐2
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.1118/1.3250863
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1158/1055‐9965.EPI‐09‐0107
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1118/1.1668512
– ident: e_1_2_7_32_1
  doi: 10.1023/B:NEPL.0000011135.19145.1b
– ident: e_1_2_7_38_1
  doi: 10.1118/1.3457331
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.9.670
– ident: e_1_2_7_28_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.315
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1118/1.2964092
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.1186/bcr2942
– ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1017
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1186/bcr2102
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1118/1.2839439
– ident: e_1_2_7_24_1
  doi: 10.1118/1.3567147
– ident: e_1_2_7_30_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.08.035
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1158/1055‐9965.EPI‐06‐0034
– ident: e_1_2_7_25_1
  doi: 10.1109/42.232244
– ident: e_1_2_7_35_1
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1543
– ident: e_1_2_7_26_1
  doi: 10.1109/42.668699
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_37_1
  doi: 10.1088/0031‐9155/49/24/003
– ident: e_1_2_7_41_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc3923
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  doi: 10.3233/XST‐2009‐0213
– ident: e_1_2_7_27_1
  doi: 10.1118/1.2841938
– ident: e_1_2_7_36_1
  doi: 10.1118/1.1636571
– reference: 18841850 - Med Phys. 2008 Sep;35(9):3988-97
– reference: 19505909 - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jun;18(6):1754-62
– reference: 18491511 - Med Phys. 2008 Apr;35(4):1199-206
– reference: 18218403 - IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1993;12(2):153-66
– reference: 10659732 - Med Phys. 2000 Jan;27(1):4-12
– reference: 15724534 - Phys Med Biol. 2004 Dec 21;49(24):5433-44
– reference: 19321626 - AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Jun;30(6):1159-64
– reference: 16399033 - Acad Radiol. 2006 Jan;13(1):63-72
– reference: 16775176 - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jun;15(6):1159-69
– reference: 15551535 - Phys Med Biol. 1994 Oct;39(10):1629-38
– reference: 18598375 - Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(3):209
– reference: 21626952 - Med Phys. 2011 Apr;38(4):2180-91
– reference: 20651210 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):496-509
– reference: 22380385 - Med Phys. 2012 Mar;39(3):1530-41
– reference: 19644211 - J Xray Sci Technol. 2009;17(1):17-40
– reference: 10540637 - Radiology. 1999 Oct;213(1):23-37
– reference: 15000608 - Med Phys. 2004 Feb;31(2):226-35
– reference: 15125012 - Med Phys. 2004 Apr;31(4):933-42
– reference: 7378990 - Cancer. 1980 May 15;45(10):2550-6
– reference: 9617911 - IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Feb;17(1):98-107
– reference: 18404942 - Med Phys. 2008 Mar;35(3):1078-86
– reference: 18227535 - Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):348-53
– reference: 18072514 - Med Phys. 2007 Nov;34(11):4491-8
– reference: 20095256 - Med Phys. 2009 Dec;36(12):5437-43
– reference: 7752271 - J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 May 3;87(9):670-5
– reference: 11701515 - Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2:315-37
– reference: 20879571 - Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):4110-20
– reference: 22114898 - Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(6):223
– reference: 22047360 - Med Phys. 2011 Nov;38(11):5961-8
– reference: 179369 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976 Jun;126(6):1130-7
SSID ssj0006350
Score 2.33657
Snippet Purpose: To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel...
Purpose: To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high‐resolution flat‐panel...
To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam...
Purpose: To determine the mean and range of volumetric glandular fraction (VGF) of the breast in a diagnostic population using a high-resolution flat-panel...
SourceID unpaywall
pubmedcentral
osti
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
scitation
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 7317
SubjectTerms 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
ALGORITHMS
biological organs
BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY
BIOPSY
breast CT
breast density
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Cancer
CAT SCANNING
CHEST
CLASSIFICATION
CLINICAL TRIALS
Computed tomography
Computerised tomographs
computerised tomography
Cone beam computed tomography
DATA ANALYSIS
Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
DOSIMETRY
Dosimetry/exposure assessment
Female
fibroglandular volume
FUZZY LOGIC
glandular fraction
Humans
Image analysis
image classification
Image data processing or generation, in general
IMAGE PROCESSING
image segmentation
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
MAMMARY GLANDS
Mammography
Mammography - methods
medical image processing
Medical image segmentation
Medical imaging
MONTE CARLO METHOD
Monte Carlo methods
Monte Carlo simulations
Organ Size
PATHOLOGY
Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods
PHANTOMS
radiation dose
RADIATION DOSES
Radiation Imaging Physics
RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY
Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Segmentation
Sensitivity and Specificity
SKIN
statistical testing
Tissues
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
WOMEN
Title Dedicated breast CT: Fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population
URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4765050
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1118%2F1.4765050
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23231281
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1238105425
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22096997
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3524966
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1118/1.4765050
UnpaywallVersion publishedVersion
Volume 39
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVEBS
  databaseName: Inspec with Full Text
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2473-4209
  dateEnd: 20241103
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0006350
  issn: 0094-2405
  databaseCode: ADMLS
  dateStart: 20070101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.ebsco.com/products/research-databases/inspec-full-text
  providerName: EBSCOhost
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED-hVsBeBgwYgTGZDyFe2uXDjhPeqo1qQnSaoJPGk0kcW5tWkmpNh-Cv52ynmQJlQuIhH1JOdhL_zv5d7nIH8FqrlBVc6wFPZGRKmMWDnAW4o4gQnUYmBZSJtjiKD0_oh1N22tQ5Nf_CuPwQ7Qc3oxl2vjYKPi-0m-cbVU_2giHlSDGMzd6PGZLxHvRPjo5HX1zuSWp8B8xmTEWTK2G2jmVIOd5U6KdNnqFOO53VqVehlq1jnn8GUN7F9cq5zvF8Wc6zH9-z2axLeO2KNb4HX1fP6gJVLobLOh_Kn7-lgfyPl3EfNhs2S0YOfg_gliq34M6k8ddvwW0bYCoXD-HTgfUIIb8luYmDr8n-9B0ZY6eVrSJiomGJmyrJt-vvlgtyXpKMFC4gEHsh87bi2COYjt9P9w8HTT2HgWSco5WaSZ37mqZhEBfIG6lKFKVockVUMe3jllOlaZjHsvCVr1DetwIRlRp53WPolVWpngCJaBFpKXmkmKRBnmcsSLiK0Fb0dVEk2oO3q2EUq4ExJTdmwtk8iQhE87I8eNmKzl2Cj3VCO-YZhRllJc-kiUGStQgRRXGacg9erDAiUDuNyyUrVbVciMAwImTFIfNg22Gm7QW5bGT8mB7wDppaAZP5u3ulPD-zGcCRNVO0Uz141eLupptfI3VVXV5LCAQTSrW4vamtNxaGf5cQk2NzePpPzT2DDSSgoQsP2oFefblUz5Hk1fku9EcHk4-fdxuF_gX_Pko-
linkProvider Unpaywall
linkToUnpaywall http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Zb9QwEB6hrTheOMoVKMgcQrzsksOOE96qwqpCalWhrVSeTOLYasWSrLpZEPx6ZuxsqsBSIfGQQ8rITuJv7G8ykxmAl9bkopLWjmWmEyphlo5LEeGOI0JsnlAKKIq2OEz3j_mHE3HS1Tmlf2F8foj-gxtphpuvScEXlfXzfKfq2ZtowiVSDLLZt1KBZHwEW8eHR7uffO5JTr4D4TKmosmVCVfHMuYSbyoO8y7P0KCdweo0alDLNjHPPwMor-N65V3neL6qF8WP78V8PiS8bsWa3oLP62f1gSpfJqu2nOifv6WB_I-XcRtudmyW7Xr43YErpt6Gawedv34brroAU728Cx_fOY8Q8ltWUhx8y_Zmb9kUO21cFRGKhmV-qmRfL75bLtlZzQpW-YBA7IUt-opj92A2fT_b2x939RzGWkiJVmqhbRlansdRWiFv5CYznKPJlXAjbIhbyY3lcZnqKjShQfnQCSRcW-R192FUN7V5CCzhVWK1lokRmkdlWYgokyZBWzG0VZXZAF6vh1GtB4ZKbsyVt3kyFanuZQXwvBdd-AQfm4R26BkVjbLRp5pikHSrYkRRmucygGdrjCjUTnK5FLVpVksVESNCVhyLAB54zPS9IJdNyI8ZgBygqRegzN_DK_XZqcsAjqyZo50awIsed5fd_Aapb835hYRCMKFUj9vL2nrlYPh3CXVwRIdH_9TcY7iBBDT24UE7MGrPV-YJkry2fNop8i-1e0iq
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dedicated+breast+CT%3A+fibroglandular+volume+measurements+in+a+diagnostic+population&rft.jtitle=Medical+physics+%28Lancaster%29&rft.au=Vedantham%2C+Srinivasan&rft.au=Shi%2C+Linxi&rft.au=Karellas%2C+Andrew&rft.au=O%27Connell%2C+Avice+M&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7317&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118%2F1.4765050&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon