Determination of an optimally sensitive and specific chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI quantification metric in relevant biological phantoms

The purpose of this study was to develop realistic phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naïve brain, and using these models determine an analysis metric for quantification of CEST MRI data that is sensitive to only labile proton exchange rate and concentrat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNMR in biomedicine Vol. 29; no. 11; pp. 1624 - 1633
Main Authors Ray, Kevin J., Larkin, James R., Tee, Yee K., Khrapitchev, Alexandre A., Karunanithy, Gogulan, Barber, Michael, Baldwin, Andrew J., Chappell, Michael A., Sibson, Nicola R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0952-3480
1099-1492
1099-1492
DOI10.1002/nbm.3614

Cover

Abstract The purpose of this study was to develop realistic phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naïve brain, and using these models determine an analysis metric for quantification of CEST MRI data that is sensitive to only labile proton exchange rate and concentration. The ability of the optimal metric to quantify pH differences in the phantoms was also evaluated. Novel phantom models were produced, by adding perchloric acid extracts of either metastatic mouse breast carcinoma cells or healthy mouse brain to bovine serum albumin. The phantom model was validated using 1H NMR spectroscopy, then utilized to determine the sensitivity of CEST MRI to changes in pH, labile proton concentration, T1 time and T2 time; six different CEST MRI analysis metrics (MTRasym, APT*, MTRRex, AREX and CESTR* with and without T1/T2 compensation) were compared. The new phantom models were highly representative of the in vivo intracellular environment of both tumour and brain tissue. Of the analysis methods compared, CESTR* with T1 and T2 time compensation was optimally specific to changes in the CEST effect (i.e. minimal contamination from T1 or T2 variation). In phantoms with identical protein concentrations, pH differences between phantoms could be quantified with a mean accuracy of 0.6 pH units. We propose that CESTR* with T1 and T2 time compensation is the optimal analysis method for these phantoms. Analysis of CEST MRI data with T1/T2 time compensated CESTR* is reproducible between phantoms, and its application in vivo may resolve the intracellular alkalosis associated with breast cancer brain metastases without the need for exogenous contrast agents. Novel biologically relevant phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naïve brain were produced, and used to determine an optimally sensitive and specific analysis metric for quantification of pH from CEST MRI data. Of the analysis methods compared, CESTR* with T1 and T2 time compensation was optimally specific to changes in the CEST effect (i.e. minimal contamination from T1 or T2 variation), with the ability to measure quantitative differences in pH with an accuracy of 0.6 pH units.
AbstractList The purpose of this study was to develop realistic phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naïve brain, and using these models determine an analysis metric for quantification of CEST MRI data that is sensitive to only labile proton exchange rate and concentration. The ability of the optimal metric to quantify pH differences in the phantoms was also evaluated. Novel phantom models were produced, by adding perchloric acid extracts of either metastatic mouse breast carcinoma cells or healthy mouse brain to bovine serum albumin. The phantom model was validated using H NMR spectroscopy, then utilized to determine the sensitivity of CEST MRI to changes in pH, labile proton concentration, T time and T time; six different CEST MRI analysis metrics (MTR , APT*, MTR , AREX and CESTR* with and without T /T compensation) were compared. The new phantom models were highly representative of the in vivo intracellular environment of both tumour and brain tissue. Of the analysis methods compared, CESTR* with T and T time compensation was optimally specific to changes in the CEST effect (i.e. minimal contamination from T or T variation). In phantoms with identical protein concentrations, pH differences between phantoms could be quantified with a mean accuracy of 0.6 pH units. We propose that CESTR* with T and T time compensation is the optimal analysis method for these phantoms. Analysis of CEST MRI data with T /T time compensated CESTR* is reproducible between phantoms, and its application in vivo may resolve the intracellular alkalosis associated with breast cancer brain metastases without the need for exogenous contrast agents.
The purpose of this study was to develop realistic phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naïve brain, and using these models determine an analysis metric for quantification of CEST MRI data that is sensitive to only labile proton exchange rate and concentration. The ability of the optimal metric to quantify pH differences in the phantoms was also evaluated. Novel phantom models were produced, by adding perchloric acid extracts of either metastatic mouse breast carcinoma cells or healthy mouse brain to bovine serum albumin. The phantom model was validated using 1H NMR spectroscopy, then utilized to determine the sensitivity of CEST MRI to changes in pH, labile proton concentration, T 1 time and T 2 time; six different CEST MRI analysis metrics (MTRasym, APT*, MTRRex, AREX and CESTR* with and without T 1/T 2 compensation) were compared. The new phantom models were highly representative of the in vivo intracellular environment of both tumour and brain tissue. Of the analysis methods compared, CESTR* with T 1 and T 2 time compensation was optimally specific to changes in the CEST effect (i.e. minimal contamination from T 1 or T 2 variation). In phantoms with identical protein concentrations, pH differences between phantoms could be quantified with a mean accuracy of 0.6 pH units. We propose that CESTR* with T 1 and T 2 time compensation is the optimal analysis method for these phantoms. Analysis of CEST MRI data with T 1/T 2 time compensated CESTR* is reproducible between phantoms, and its application in vivo may resolve the intracellular alkalosis associated with breast cancer brain metastases without the need for exogenous contrast agents.
The purpose of this study was to develop realistic phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naïve brain, and using these models determine an analysis metric for quantification of CEST MRI data that is sensitive to only labile proton exchange rate and concentration. The ability of the optimal metric to quantify pH differences in the phantoms was also evaluated. Novel phantom models were produced, by adding perchloric acid extracts of either metastatic mouse breast carcinoma cells or healthy mouse brain to bovine serum albumin. The phantom model was validated using 1H NMR spectroscopy, then utilized to determine the sensitivity of CEST MRI to changes in pH, labile proton concentration, T1 time and T2 time; six different CEST MRI analysis metrics (MTRasym, APT*, MTRRex, AREX and CESTR* with and without T1/T2 compensation) were compared. The new phantom models were highly representative of the in vivo intracellular environment of both tumour and brain tissue. Of the analysis methods compared, CESTR* with T1 and T2 time compensation was optimally specific to changes in the CEST effect (i.e. minimal contamination from T1 or T2 variation). In phantoms with identical protein concentrations, pH differences between phantoms could be quantified with a mean accuracy of 0.6 pH units. We propose that CESTR* with T1 and T2 time compensation is the optimal analysis method for these phantoms. Analysis of CEST MRI data with T1/T2 time compensated CESTR* is reproducible between phantoms, and its application in vivo may resolve the intracellular alkalosis associated with breast cancer brain metastases without the need for exogenous contrast agents.
The purpose of this study was to develop realistic phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naïve brain, and using these models determine an analysis metric for quantification of CEST MRI data that is sensitive to only labile proton exchange rate and concentration. The ability of the optimal metric to quantify pH differences in the phantoms was also evaluated. Novel phantom models were produced, by adding perchloric acid extracts of either metastatic mouse breast carcinoma cells or healthy mouse brain to bovine serum albumin. The phantom model was validated using 1 H NMR spectroscopy, then utilized to determine the sensitivity of CEST MRI to changes in pH, labile proton concentration, T1 time and T2 time; six different CEST MRI analysis metrics (MTRasym , APT*, MTRRex , AREX and CESTR* with and without T1 /T2 compensation) were compared. The new phantom models were highly representative of the in vivo intracellular environment of both tumour and brain tissue. Of the analysis methods compared, CESTR* with T1 and T2 time compensation was optimally specific to changes in the CEST effect (i.e. minimal contamination from T1 or T2 variation). In phantoms with identical protein concentrations, pH differences between phantoms could be quantified with a mean accuracy of 0.6 pH units. We propose that CESTR* with T1 and T2 time compensation is the optimal analysis method for these phantoms. Analysis of CEST MRI data with T1 /T2 time compensated CESTR* is reproducible between phantoms, and its application in vivo may resolve the intracellular alkalosis associated with breast cancer brain metastases without the need for exogenous contrast agents.The purpose of this study was to develop realistic phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naïve brain, and using these models determine an analysis metric for quantification of CEST MRI data that is sensitive to only labile proton exchange rate and concentration. The ability of the optimal metric to quantify pH differences in the phantoms was also evaluated. Novel phantom models were produced, by adding perchloric acid extracts of either metastatic mouse breast carcinoma cells or healthy mouse brain to bovine serum albumin. The phantom model was validated using 1 H NMR spectroscopy, then utilized to determine the sensitivity of CEST MRI to changes in pH, labile proton concentration, T1 time and T2 time; six different CEST MRI analysis metrics (MTRasym , APT*, MTRRex , AREX and CESTR* with and without T1 /T2 compensation) were compared. The new phantom models were highly representative of the in vivo intracellular environment of both tumour and brain tissue. Of the analysis methods compared, CESTR* with T1 and T2 time compensation was optimally specific to changes in the CEST effect (i.e. minimal contamination from T1 or T2 variation). In phantoms with identical protein concentrations, pH differences between phantoms could be quantified with a mean accuracy of 0.6 pH units. We propose that CESTR* with T1 and T2 time compensation is the optimal analysis method for these phantoms. Analysis of CEST MRI data with T1 /T2 time compensated CESTR* is reproducible between phantoms, and its application in vivo may resolve the intracellular alkalosis associated with breast cancer brain metastases without the need for exogenous contrast agents.
The purpose of this study was to develop realistic phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naive brain, and using these models determine an analysis metric for quantification of CEST MRI data that is sensitive to only labile proton exchange rate and concentration. The ability of the optimal metric to quantify pH differences in the phantoms was also evaluated. Novel phantom models were produced, by adding perchloric acid extracts of either metastatic mouse breast carcinoma cells or healthy mouse brain to bovine serum albumin. The phantom model was validated using super(1)H NMR spectroscopy, then utilized to determine the sensitivity of CEST MRI to changes in pH, labile proton concentration, T sub(1) time and T sub(2) time; six different CEST MRI analysis metrics (MTR sub(asym), APT*, MTR sub(Rex), AREX and CESTR* with and without T sub(1)/T sub(2) compensation) were compared. The new phantom models were highly representative of the in vivo intracellular environment of both tumour and brain tissue. Of the analysis methods compared, CESTR* with T sub(1) and T sub(2) time compensation was optimally specific to changes in the CEST effect (i.e. minimal contamination from T sub(1) or T sub(2) variation). In phantoms with identical protein concentrations, pH differences between phantoms could be quantified with a mean accuracy of 0.6 pH units. We propose that CESTR* with T sub(1) and T sub(2) time compensation is the optimal analysis method for these phantoms. Analysis of CEST MRI data with T sub(1)/T sub(2) time compensated CESTR* is reproducible between phantoms, and its application in vivo may resolve the intracellular alkalosis associated with breast cancer brain metastases without the need for exogenous contrast agents. Novel biologically relevant phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naive brain were produced, and used to determine an optimally sensitive and specific analysis metric for quantification of pH from CEST MRI data. Of the analysis methods compared, CESTR* with T sub(1) and T sub(2) time compensation was optimally specific to changes in the CEST effect (i.e. minimal contamination from T sub(1) or T sub(2) variation), with the ability to measure quantitative differences in pH with an accuracy of 0.6 pH units.
The purpose of this study was to develop realistic phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naïve brain, and using these models determine an analysis metric for quantification of CEST MRI data that is sensitive to only labile proton exchange rate and concentration. The ability of the optimal metric to quantify pH differences in the phantoms was also evaluated. Novel phantom models were produced, by adding perchloric acid extracts of either metastatic mouse breast carcinoma cells or healthy mouse brain to bovine serum albumin. The phantom model was validated using 1H NMR spectroscopy, then utilized to determine the sensitivity of CEST MRI to changes in pH, labile proton concentration, T1 time and T2 time; six different CEST MRI analysis metrics (MTRasym, APT*, MTRRex, AREX and CESTR* with and without T1/T2 compensation) were compared. The new phantom models were highly representative of the in vivo intracellular environment of both tumour and brain tissue. Of the analysis methods compared, CESTR* with T1 and T2 time compensation was optimally specific to changes in the CEST effect (i.e. minimal contamination from T1 or T2 variation). In phantoms with identical protein concentrations, pH differences between phantoms could be quantified with a mean accuracy of 0.6 pH units. We propose that CESTR* with T1 and T2 time compensation is the optimal analysis method for these phantoms. Analysis of CEST MRI data with T1/T2 time compensated CESTR* is reproducible between phantoms, and its application in vivo may resolve the intracellular alkalosis associated with breast cancer brain metastases without the need for exogenous contrast agents. Novel biologically relevant phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naïve brain were produced, and used to determine an optimally sensitive and specific analysis metric for quantification of pH from CEST MRI data. Of the analysis methods compared, CESTR* with T1 and T2 time compensation was optimally specific to changes in the CEST effect (i.e. minimal contamination from T1 or T2 variation), with the ability to measure quantitative differences in pH with an accuracy of 0.6 pH units.
The purpose of this study was to develop realistic phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naïve brain, and using these models determine an analysis metric for quantification of CEST MRI data that is sensitive to only labile proton exchange rate and concentration. The ability of the optimal metric to quantify pH differences in the phantoms was also evaluated. Novel phantom models were produced, by adding perchloric acid extracts of either metastatic mouse breast carcinoma cells or healthy mouse brain to bovine serum albumin. The phantom model was validated using 1 H NMR spectroscopy, then utilized to determine the sensitivity of CEST MRI to changes in pH, labile proton concentration, T 1 time and T 2 time; six different CEST MRI analysis metrics (MTR asym , APT*, MTR Rex , AREX and CESTR* with and without T 1 / T 2 compensation) were compared. The new phantom models were highly representative of the in vivo intracellular environment of both tumour and brain tissue. Of the analysis methods compared, CESTR* with T 1 and T 2 time compensation was optimally specific to changes in the CEST effect (i.e. minimal contamination from T 1 or T 2 variation). In phantoms with identical protein concentrations, pH differences between phantoms could be quantified with a mean accuracy of 0.6 pH units. We propose that CESTR* with T 1 and T 2 time compensation is the optimal analysis method for these phantoms. Analysis of CEST MRI data with T 1 / T 2 time compensated CESTR* is reproducible between phantoms, and its application in vivo may resolve the intracellular alkalosis associated with breast cancer brain metastases without the need for exogenous contrast agents.
Author Ray, Kevin J.
Larkin, James R.
Baldwin, Andrew J.
Khrapitchev, Alexandre A.
Sibson, Nicola R.
Barber, Michael
Karunanithy, Gogulan
Chappell, Michael A.
Tee, Yee K.
AuthorAffiliation 1 Cancer Research UK and Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology University of Oxford Oxford OX3 7LE UK
2 Department of Mechatronics and Biomedical Engineering, Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman Malaysia
3 Physical and Theoretical Chemistry University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3QZ UK
4 Institute for Biomedical Engineering University of Oxford Oxford OX3 7LE UK
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Cancer Research UK and Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology University of Oxford Oxford OX3 7LE UK
– name: 4 Institute for Biomedical Engineering University of Oxford Oxford OX3 7LE UK
– name: 2 Department of Mechatronics and Biomedical Engineering, Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman Malaysia
– name: 3 Physical and Theoretical Chemistry University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3QZ UK
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Kevin J.
  surname: Ray
  fullname: Ray, Kevin J.
  organization: Cancer Research UK and Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK
– sequence: 2
  givenname: James R.
  surname: Larkin
  fullname: Larkin, James R.
  organization: Cancer Research UK and Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yee K.
  surname: Tee
  fullname: Tee, Yee K.
  organization: Department of Mechatronics and Biomedical Engineering, Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Alexandre A.
  surname: Khrapitchev
  fullname: Khrapitchev, Alexandre A.
  organization: Cancer Research UK and Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Gogulan
  surname: Karunanithy
  fullname: Karunanithy, Gogulan
  organization: Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QZ, UK
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Michael
  surname: Barber
  fullname: Barber, Michael
  organization: Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QZ, UK
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Andrew J.
  surname: Baldwin
  fullname: Baldwin, Andrew J.
  organization: Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QZ, UK
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Michael A.
  surname: Chappell
  fullname: Chappell, Michael A.
  organization: Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Nicola R.
  surname: Sibson
  fullname: Sibson, Nicola R.
  email: nicola.sibson@oncology.ox.ac.uk, nicola.sibson@oncology.ox.ac.uk
  organization: Cancer Research UK and Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27686882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkt9OFDEUxicGIwua-ARmEm_0Ytb-m-n0xgRRgQQwIRoum073zG5xph3azsK-hw9sl0UQosabNun5na_9vtOdbMs6C1n2EqMpRoi8s00_pRVmT7IJRkIUmAmylU2QKElBWY22s50QLhBCNaPkWbZNeFVXdU0m2Y-PEMH3xqponM1dm6u0DtH0qutWeQAbTDRLSMezPAygTWt0rhfQG626HK71Qtk55EHF0W80olc2tODzk7Oj_HJUNq57NrUeok_9xuYeOlimWt4Y17n5jdqQtKLrw_Psaau6AC9u993s2-dPX_cPi-MvB0f7e8eFLnnJCo0oh4ojxgjnguEGOK-FFjNegwZNG6gpasmMIo5BJ_NKzwirRCMY1Qmju9nbje5oB7W6So7l4JNzv5IYyXWyMiUr18km9v2GHcamh5kGm3ze804Z-bBizULO3VKWaQql4Engza2Ad5cjhCh7EzR0nbLgxiBxTTnFaSjif9CSMY7LOqGvH6EXbvQ2pZYoInhdEV4m6tXvj7979a9_cH-j9i4ED-2_gpg-QrWJN9NNtk33p4Zi03BlOlj9VViefjh5yJsQ4fqOV_67rDjlpTw_PZCCVPTwHJ_Jkv4Ea-by9g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmr_2019_106648
crossref_primary_10_3390_jimaging10070166
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2018_00901
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_28565
crossref_primary_10_1002_nbm_4711
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmr_2019_01_006
crossref_primary_10_1158_0008_5472_CAN_18_2168
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_28212
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nicl_2019_101833
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_29187
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_29173
crossref_primary_10_1021_acschemneuro_9b00334
Cites_doi 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199905)41:5<897::AID-MRM7>3.0.CO;2-T
10.1073/pnas.92.8.3156
10.1002/mrm.24639
10.1109/MEMB.2004.1360409
10.1002/mrm.24474
10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
10.1002/nbm.3075
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.040
10.1038/nm907
10.1002/nbm.3054
10.1002/nbm.3147
10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.105
10.1007/BF02435024
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.047
10.1002/mrm.22761
10.1002/mrm.24822
10.1002/mrm.22242
10.1073/pnas.71.4.1471
10.1038/nm.2268
10.1093/brain/awu374
10.1002/nbm.3317
10.1002/ijc.28406
10.1002/mrm.10651
10.1007/BF00197809
10.1002/mrm.24315
10.1002/nbm.1216
10.1007/s11307-015-0828-6
10.1002/cmmi.1569
10.1038/jcbfm.2014.12
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2016 The Authors NMR in Biomedicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2016 The Authors NMR in Biomedicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2016 The Authors NMR in Biomedicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
– notice: 2016 The Authors NMR in Biomedicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DBID BSCLL
24P
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
5PM
ADTOC
UNPAY
DOI 10.1002/nbm.3614
DatabaseName Istex
Wiley Online Library Open Access
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content
Unpaywall
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
Engineering Research Database

CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access - NZ
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: UNPAY
  name: Unpaywall
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Access Repository
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Chemistry
Physics
DocumentTitleAlternate CEST MRI for pH measurement in relevant biological phantoms
EISSN 1099-1492
EndPage 1633
ExternalDocumentID 10.1002/nbm.3614
PMC5095597
4218307331
27686882
10_1002_nbm_3614
NBM3614
ark_67375_WNG_9263HW1R_5
Genre article
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Cancer Research UK
  funderid: C5255/A15935
– fundername: Wellcome Trust
– fundername: Cancer Research UK
  grantid: 16466
– fundername: Medical Research Council
  grantid: MR/K501256/1
– fundername: Cancer Research UK
  grantid: 16945
– fundername: Medical Research Council
  grantid: MC_ST_U13080
– fundername: Wellcome Trust
  grantid: WT088877/Z/09/Z
– fundername: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
– fundername: Cancer Research UK
  grantid: C5255/A15935
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1L6
1OB
1OC
1ZS
31~
33P
3SF
3WU
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIJN
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AIACR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
AITYG
AIURR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
DUUFO
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
H.X
HBH
HF~
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HVGLF
HZ~
IX1
J0M
JPC
KBYEO
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
M65
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OIG
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4D
PALCI
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
UB1
V2E
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIB
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WJL
WOHZO
WQJ
WVDHM
WXSBR
XG1
XPP
XV2
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
24P
AAHHS
ACCFJ
AEEZP
AEQDE
AEUQT
AFPWT
AIWBW
AJBDE
RGB
RWI
WRC
WUP
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
5PM
ADTOC
UNPAY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5754-c037e67044277941be7789c9d78ecec3be830f2d3071ec008acd2469b943cc9d3
IEDL.DBID 24P
ISSN 0952-3480
1099-1492
IngestDate Wed Oct 29 11:19:50 EDT 2025
Tue Sep 30 17:03:58 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 09:43:34 EDT 2025
Thu Oct 02 10:36:15 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 06:34:14 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:01:37 EDT 2025
Sat Oct 25 05:24:59 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:11 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:58:41 EST 2025
Sun Sep 21 06:18:07 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Keywords pH
metastases
CEST
brain
MRI
Language English
License Attribution
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2016 The Authors NMR in Biomedicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
cc-by
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5754-c037e67044277941be7789c9d78ecec3be830f2d3071ec008acd2469b943cc9d3
Notes ArticleID:NBM3614
ark:/67375/WNG-9263HW1R-5
Cancer Research UK - No. C5255/A15935
istex:A693A6F065EB558BF3C97789D11301354E67E576
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Joint senior authors
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fnbm.3614
PMID 27686882
PQID 1829786275
PQPubID 2029982
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs unpaywall_primary_10_1002_nbm_3614
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5095597
proquest_miscellaneous_1837318829
proquest_miscellaneous_1835447158
proquest_journals_1829786275
pubmed_primary_27686882
crossref_primary_10_1002_nbm_3614
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_nbm_3614
wiley_primary_10_1002_nbm_3614_NBM3614
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_9263HW1R_5
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate November 2016
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2016
  text: November 2016
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Oxford
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle NMR in biomedicine
PublicationTitleAlternate NMR Biomed
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
– name: John Wiley and Sons Inc
References Zhou J, Payen JF, Wilson DA, Traystman RJ, van Zijl PC. Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI. Nat Med. 2003a;9:1085-1090.
Dixon WT, Ren J, Lubag AJM, et al. A concentration-independent method to measure exchange rates in PARACEST agents. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63:625-632. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22242
Jin T, Wang P, Zong X, Kim S-G. MR imaging of the amide-proton transfer effect and the pH-insensitive nuclear Overhauser effect at 9.4 T. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69:760-770. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24315
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646-674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
Yan K, Fu Z, Yang C, et al. Assessing amide proton transfer (APT) MRI contrast origins in 9 l gliosarcoma in the rat brain using proteomic analysis. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17:479-487. doi: 10.1007/s11307-015-0828-6
Zaiss M, Xu J, Goerke S, et al. Inverse Z-spectrum analysis for spillover-, MT-, and T1 -corrected steady-state pulsed CEST MRI-application to pH-weighted MRI of acute stroke. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:240-252. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3054
Zhou J, Tryggestad E, Wen Z, et al. Differentiation between glioma and radiation necrosis using molecular magnetic resonance imaging of endogenous proteins and peptides. Nat Med. 2011;17:130-134. doi: 10.1038/nm.2268
Zaiss M, Windschuh J, Paech D, et al. Relaxation-compensated CEST-MRI of the human brain at 7 T: unbiased insight into NOE and amide signal changes in human glioblastoma. Neuroimage. 2015;112:180-188. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.040
Serres S, Martin CJ, Sarmiento Soto M, et al. Structural and functional effects of metastases in rat brain determined by multimodal MRI. Integr Cancer Ther. 2014;134:885-896. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28406
Porcelli AM, Ghelli A, Zanna C, Pinton P, Rizzuto R, Rugolo M. pH difference across the outer mitochondrial membrane measured with a green fluorescent protein mutant. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;326:799-804. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.105
Harston GWJ, Tee YK, Blockley N, et al. Identifying the ischaemic penumbra using pH-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Brain. 2015;138:36-42. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu374
Goerke S, Zaiss M, Kunz P, et al. Signature of protein unfolding in chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:906-913. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3317
McVicar N, Li AX, Gonçalves DF, et al. Quantitative tissue pH measurement during cerebral ischemia using amine and amide concentration-independent detection (AACID) with MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.12
Tee YK, Harston GWJ, Blockley N, et al. Comparing different analysis methods for quantifying the MRI amide proton transfer (APT) effect in hyperacute stroke patients. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:1019-1029. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3147
Chappell MA, Donahue MJ, Tee YK, et al. Quantitative Bayesian model-based analysis of amide proton transfer MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70:556-567.
Salhotra A, Lal B, Laterra J, Sun PZ, van Zijl PCM, Zhou J. Amide proton transfer imaging of 9 L gliosarcoma and human glioblastoma xenografts. NMR Biomed. 2008;21:489-497. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1216
Bhujwalla ZM, Aboagye EO, Gillies RJ, Chacko VP, Mendola CE, Backer JM. Nm23-transfected MDA-MB-435 human breast carcinoma cells form tumors with altered phospholipid metabolism and pH: a 31P nuclear magnetic resonance study in vivo and in vitro. Magn Reson Med. 1999;41:897-903.
Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6:65-70.
Desmond KL, Moosvi F, Stanisz GJ. Mapping of amide, amine, and aliphatic peaks in the CEST spectra of murine xenografts at 7 T. Magn Reson Med. 2013. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24822
Banay-Schwartz M, Kenessey A, DeGuzman T, Lajtha A, Palkovits M. Protein content of various regions of rat brain and adult and aging human brain. Age. 1992;15:51-54. doi: 10.1007/BF02435024
Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR. 1995;6:277-293.
Zhou J, Lal B, Wilson DA, Laterra J, van Zijl PC. Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors. Magn Reson Med. 2003b;50:1120-1126.
Sun PZ, Wang Y, Dai Z, Xiao G, Wu R. Quantitative chemical exchange saturation transfer (qCEST) MRI-RF spillover effect corrected omega plot for simultaneous determination of labile proton fraction ratio and exchange rate. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2014;9:268-275. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.1569
Overly CC, Lee KD, Berthiaume E, Hollenbeck PJ. Quantitative measurement of intraorganelle pH in the endosomal-lysosomal pathway in neurons by using ratiometric imaging with pyranine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:3156-3160.
van Zijl PC, Yadav NN. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't? Magn Reson Med. 2011;65:927-948.
Gillies RJ, Raghunand N, Garcia-Martin ML, Gatenby RA. pH imaging. A review of pH measurement methods and applications in cancers. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2004;23:57-64.
Xu J, Zaiss M, Zu Z, et al. On the origins of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) contrast in tumors at 9.4 T. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:406-416. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3075
Jones CK, Huang A, Xu J, et al. Nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) imaging in the human brain at 7 T. Neuroimage. 2013;77:114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.047
Damadian R, Zaner K, Hor D, DiMaio T. Human tumors detected by nuclear magnetic resonance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974;71:1471-1473. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1471
Zong X, Wang P, Kim S-G, Jin T. Sensitivity and source of amine-proton exchange and amide-proton transfer magnetic resonance imaging in cerebral ischemia. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71:118-132. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24639
2015; 17
2013; 69
1995; 92
1974; 71
2004; 23
2014; 27
2013; 70
1999; 41
1992; 15
2011; 17
2010; 63
1995; 6
2003a; 9
2014; 134
2015; 28
2013; 77
2015; 138
2003b; 50
2015; 112
2005; 326
1979; 6
2011; 65
2008; 21
2014
2013
2014; 9
2014; 71
2011; 144
e_1_2_8_28_1
e_1_2_8_29_1
e_1_2_8_24_1
e_1_2_8_25_1
e_1_2_8_27_1
e_1_2_8_3_1
Holm S (e_1_2_8_26_1) 1979; 6
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_4_1
e_1_2_8_7_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
e_1_2_8_9_1
e_1_2_8_8_1
e_1_2_8_20_1
e_1_2_8_21_1
e_1_2_8_22_1
e_1_2_8_23_1
e_1_2_8_17_1
e_1_2_8_18_1
e_1_2_8_19_1
e_1_2_8_13_1
e_1_2_8_14_1
e_1_2_8_15_1
e_1_2_8_16_1
e_1_2_8_10_1
e_1_2_8_31_1
e_1_2_8_11_1
e_1_2_8_12_1
e_1_2_8_30_1
References_xml – reference: Dixon WT, Ren J, Lubag AJM, et al. A concentration-independent method to measure exchange rates in PARACEST agents. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63:625-632. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22242
– reference: McVicar N, Li AX, Gonçalves DF, et al. Quantitative tissue pH measurement during cerebral ischemia using amine and amide concentration-independent detection (AACID) with MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.12
– reference: Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6:65-70.
– reference: Sun PZ, Wang Y, Dai Z, Xiao G, Wu R. Quantitative chemical exchange saturation transfer (qCEST) MRI-RF spillover effect corrected omega plot for simultaneous determination of labile proton fraction ratio and exchange rate. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2014;9:268-275. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.1569
– reference: Yan K, Fu Z, Yang C, et al. Assessing amide proton transfer (APT) MRI contrast origins in 9 l gliosarcoma in the rat brain using proteomic analysis. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17:479-487. doi: 10.1007/s11307-015-0828-6
– reference: Salhotra A, Lal B, Laterra J, Sun PZ, van Zijl PCM, Zhou J. Amide proton transfer imaging of 9 L gliosarcoma and human glioblastoma xenografts. NMR Biomed. 2008;21:489-497. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1216
– reference: Gillies RJ, Raghunand N, Garcia-Martin ML, Gatenby RA. pH imaging. A review of pH measurement methods and applications in cancers. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2004;23:57-64.
– reference: Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR. 1995;6:277-293.
– reference: Damadian R, Zaner K, Hor D, DiMaio T. Human tumors detected by nuclear magnetic resonance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974;71:1471-1473. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1471
– reference: Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646-674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
– reference: Jin T, Wang P, Zong X, Kim S-G. MR imaging of the amide-proton transfer effect and the pH-insensitive nuclear Overhauser effect at 9.4 T. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69:760-770. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24315
– reference: Zaiss M, Xu J, Goerke S, et al. Inverse Z-spectrum analysis for spillover-, MT-, and T1 -corrected steady-state pulsed CEST MRI-application to pH-weighted MRI of acute stroke. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:240-252. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3054
– reference: Tee YK, Harston GWJ, Blockley N, et al. Comparing different analysis methods for quantifying the MRI amide proton transfer (APT) effect in hyperacute stroke patients. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:1019-1029. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3147
– reference: Chappell MA, Donahue MJ, Tee YK, et al. Quantitative Bayesian model-based analysis of amide proton transfer MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70:556-567.
– reference: Banay-Schwartz M, Kenessey A, DeGuzman T, Lajtha A, Palkovits M. Protein content of various regions of rat brain and adult and aging human brain. Age. 1992;15:51-54. doi: 10.1007/BF02435024
– reference: Xu J, Zaiss M, Zu Z, et al. On the origins of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) contrast in tumors at 9.4 T. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:406-416. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3075
– reference: Porcelli AM, Ghelli A, Zanna C, Pinton P, Rizzuto R, Rugolo M. pH difference across the outer mitochondrial membrane measured with a green fluorescent protein mutant. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;326:799-804. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.105
– reference: Serres S, Martin CJ, Sarmiento Soto M, et al. Structural and functional effects of metastases in rat brain determined by multimodal MRI. Integr Cancer Ther. 2014;134:885-896. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28406
– reference: Overly CC, Lee KD, Berthiaume E, Hollenbeck PJ. Quantitative measurement of intraorganelle pH in the endosomal-lysosomal pathway in neurons by using ratiometric imaging with pyranine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:3156-3160.
– reference: Zhou J, Lal B, Wilson DA, Laterra J, van Zijl PC. Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors. Magn Reson Med. 2003b;50:1120-1126.
– reference: Zong X, Wang P, Kim S-G, Jin T. Sensitivity and source of amine-proton exchange and amide-proton transfer magnetic resonance imaging in cerebral ischemia. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71:118-132. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24639
– reference: Desmond KL, Moosvi F, Stanisz GJ. Mapping of amide, amine, and aliphatic peaks in the CEST spectra of murine xenografts at 7 T. Magn Reson Med. 2013. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24822
– reference: Harston GWJ, Tee YK, Blockley N, et al. Identifying the ischaemic penumbra using pH-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Brain. 2015;138:36-42. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu374
– reference: Zhou J, Tryggestad E, Wen Z, et al. Differentiation between glioma and radiation necrosis using molecular magnetic resonance imaging of endogenous proteins and peptides. Nat Med. 2011;17:130-134. doi: 10.1038/nm.2268
– reference: Bhujwalla ZM, Aboagye EO, Gillies RJ, Chacko VP, Mendola CE, Backer JM. Nm23-transfected MDA-MB-435 human breast carcinoma cells form tumors with altered phospholipid metabolism and pH: a 31P nuclear magnetic resonance study in vivo and in vitro. Magn Reson Med. 1999;41:897-903.
– reference: Goerke S, Zaiss M, Kunz P, et al. Signature of protein unfolding in chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:906-913. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3317
– reference: Jones CK, Huang A, Xu J, et al. Nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) imaging in the human brain at 7 T. Neuroimage. 2013;77:114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.047
– reference: Zhou J, Payen JF, Wilson DA, Traystman RJ, van Zijl PC. Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI. Nat Med. 2003a;9:1085-1090.
– reference: van Zijl PC, Yadav NN. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't? Magn Reson Med. 2011;65:927-948.
– reference: Zaiss M, Windschuh J, Paech D, et al. Relaxation-compensated CEST-MRI of the human brain at 7 T: unbiased insight into NOE and amide signal changes in human glioblastoma. Neuroimage. 2015;112:180-188. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.040
– volume: 112
  start-page: 180
  year: 2015
  end-page: 188
  article-title: Relaxation‐compensated CEST‐MRI of the human brain at 7 T: unbiased insight into NOE and amide signal changes in human glioblastoma
  publication-title: Neuroimage
– volume: 70
  start-page: 556
  year: 2013
  end-page: 567
  article-title: Quantitative Bayesian model‐based analysis of amide proton transfer MRI
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
– year: 2013
  article-title: Mapping of amide, amine, and aliphatic peaks in the CEST spectra of murine xenografts at 7 T
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1019
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1029
  article-title: Comparing different analysis methods for quantifying the MRI amide proton transfer (APT) effect in hyperacute stroke patients
  publication-title: NMR Biomed
– volume: 144
  start-page: 646
  year: 2011
  end-page: 674
  article-title: Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation
  publication-title: Cell
– volume: 21
  start-page: 489
  year: 2008
  end-page: 497
  article-title: Amide proton transfer imaging of 9 L gliosarcoma and human glioblastoma xenografts
  publication-title: NMR Biomed
– volume: 6
  start-page: 65
  year: 1979
  end-page: 70
  article-title: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure
  publication-title: Scand J Stat
– volume: 92
  start-page: 3156
  year: 1995
  end-page: 3160
  article-title: Quantitative measurement of intraorganelle pH in the endosomal–lysosomal pathway in neurons by using ratiometric imaging with pyranine
  publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
– volume: 9
  start-page: 268
  year: 2014
  end-page: 275
  article-title: Quantitative chemical exchange saturation transfer (qCEST) MRI—RF spillover effect corrected omega plot for simultaneous determination of labile proton fraction ratio and exchange rate
  publication-title: Contrast Media Mol Imaging
– volume: 326
  start-page: 799
  year: 2005
  end-page: 804
  article-title: pH difference across the outer mitochondrial membrane measured with a green fluorescent protein mutant
  publication-title: Biochem Biophys Res Commun
– volume: 15
  start-page: 51
  year: 1992
  end-page: 54
  article-title: Protein content of various regions of rat brain and adult and aging human brain
  publication-title: Age
– volume: 71
  start-page: 118
  year: 2014
  end-page: 132
  article-title: Sensitivity and source of amine‐proton exchange and amide‐proton transfer magnetic resonance imaging in cerebral ischemia
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
– volume: 63
  start-page: 625
  year: 2010
  end-page: 632
  article-title: A concentration‐independent method to measure exchange rates in PARACEST agents
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
– volume: 17
  start-page: 130
  year: 2011
  end-page: 134
  article-title: Differentiation between glioma and radiation necrosis using molecular magnetic resonance imaging of endogenous proteins and peptides
  publication-title: Nat Med
– volume: 6
  start-page: 277
  year: 1995
  end-page: 293
  article-title: NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes
  publication-title: J Biomol NMR
– volume: 69
  start-page: 760
  year: 2013
  end-page: 770
  article-title: MR imaging of the amide‐proton transfer effect and the pH‐insensitive nuclear Overhauser effect at 9.4 T
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
– volume: 65
  start-page: 927
  year: 2011
  end-page: 948
  article-title: Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't?
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
– volume: 138
  start-page: 36
  year: 2015
  end-page: 42
  article-title: Identifying the ischaemic penumbra using pH‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging
  publication-title: Brain
– volume: 50
  start-page: 1120
  year: 2003b
  end-page: 1126
  article-title: Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
– volume: 77
  start-page: 114
  year: 2013
  end-page: 124
  article-title: Nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) imaging in the human brain at 7 T
  publication-title: Neuroimage
– year: 2014
  article-title: Quantitative tissue pH measurement during cerebral ischemia using amine and amide concentration‐independent detection (AACID) with MRI
  publication-title: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1085
  year: 2003a
  end-page: 1090
  article-title: Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI
  publication-title: Nat Med
– volume: 17
  start-page: 479
  year: 2015
  end-page: 487
  article-title: Assessing amide proton transfer (APT) MRI contrast origins in 9 l gliosarcoma in the rat brain using proteomic analysis
  publication-title: Mol Imaging Biol
– volume: 41
  start-page: 897
  year: 1999
  end-page: 903
  article-title: Nm23‐transfected MDA‐MB‐435 human breast carcinoma cells form tumors with altered phospholipid metabolism and pH: a P nuclear magnetic resonance study in vivo and in vitro
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
– volume: 23
  start-page: 57
  year: 2004
  end-page: 64
  article-title: pH imaging. A review of pH measurement methods and applications in cancers
  publication-title: IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag
– volume: 27
  start-page: 406
  year: 2014
  end-page: 416
  article-title: On the origins of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) contrast in tumors at 9.4 T
  publication-title: NMR Biomed
– volume: 134
  start-page: 885
  year: 2014
  end-page: 896
  article-title: Structural and functional effects of metastases in rat brain determined by multimodal MRI
  publication-title: Integr Cancer Ther
– volume: 28
  start-page: 906
  year: 2015
  end-page: 913
  article-title: Signature of protein unfolding in chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging
  publication-title: NMR Biomed
– volume: 27
  start-page: 240
  year: 2014
  end-page: 252
  article-title: Inverse Z‐spectrum analysis for spillover‐, MT‐, and T1 ‐corrected steady‐state pulsed CEST MRI—application to pH‐weighted MRI of acute stroke
  publication-title: NMR Biomed
– volume: 71
  start-page: 1471
  year: 1974
  end-page: 1473
  article-title: Human tumors detected by nuclear magnetic resonance
  publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
– ident: e_1_2_8_21_1
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199905)41:5<897::AID-MRM7>3.0.CO;2-T
– ident: e_1_2_8_31_1
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3156
– ident: e_1_2_8_29_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.24639
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
  doi: 10.1109/MEMB.2004.1360409
– ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.24474
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  doi: 10.1002/nbm.3075
– volume: 6
  start-page: 65
  year: 1979
  ident: e_1_2_8_26_1
  article-title: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure
  publication-title: Scand J Stat
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.040
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.1038/nm907
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_1
  doi: 10.1002/nbm.3054
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
  doi: 10.1002/nbm.3147
– ident: e_1_2_8_30_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.105
– ident: e_1_2_8_23_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF02435024
– ident: e_1_2_8_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.047
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.22761
– ident: e_1_2_8_18_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.24822
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.22242
– ident: e_1_2_8_27_1
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1471
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.1038/nm.2268
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awu374
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  doi: 10.1002/nbm.3317
– ident: e_1_2_8_20_1
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.28406
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.10651
– ident: e_1_2_8_24_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00197809
– ident: e_1_2_8_25_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.24315
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
  doi: 10.1002/nbm.1216
– ident: e_1_2_8_28_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11307-015-0828-6
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
  doi: 10.1002/cmmi.1569
– ident: e_1_2_8_22_1
  doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.12
SSID ssj0008432
Score 2.2455816
Snippet The purpose of this study was to develop realistic phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naïve brain, and using these...
The purpose of this study was to develop realistic phantom models of the intracellular environment of metastatic breast tumour and naive brain, and using these...
SourceID unpaywall
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1624
SubjectTerms Algorithms
Animals
brain
CEST
Equipment Design
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
metastases
Mice
Molecular Imaging - instrumentation
Molecular Imaging - methods
MRI
Neoplasms, Experimental - chemistry
Neoplasms, Experimental - diagnostic imaging
Neoplasms, Experimental - pathology
Phantoms, Imaging
Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Unpaywall
  dbid: UNPAY
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED-hVjBe-CgfCwxkEIKnlCZx7ORxDEZBaoUmqo2nyHEcbVqbdm0qNv4O_mDu4iRaYUxIvKRSfL3U7vn8c3z3O4BXcZTKQZh7rjII33ge5a4S0ndVhN4yF1pxTe8hR2MxnPDPR-HRpVwYCqu0HBHtSzeaHZXPpkm-yHLr6-sTfv9tkc76gaBa1l0RIh7vQHcy_rL7zZLs-W7AI0tJEMcubgf8hoH20lc31qQuDe_5VYDzz7jJrXWxUBff1XS6iW2rxWn_LuimWzYm5bS_LtO-_vEb4-P_9fse3KmxK9u1xnYfbpiiB1t7Tcm4Htwa1Sf1PbhZhZbq1QP4-b6JuCEbYPOcKbyip5phhy7YiiLoyefi7YxR4icFLzFdExkwc25zk9mKKEitjrJC22bJRgef2Nla2YAn2zajEmGanRSMysHgPqFklmiq0rY4pqLJs9VDmOx_-Lo3dOtaEK5GQMldPQikEXLAuS_RhXipkTKKdZzJyGijg9REwSD3M3RZntEIbJTOfNz6pzEPNIoFj6BTzAuzDcykPItkIGSWxTw3ZMVcijDzKG0Y9TnwprGGRNdE6VSvY5pYimc_waFPaOgdeNFKLiw5yBUyryuDagXU8pSC6WSYHI4_JrEvguGhd5CEDuw0FpfUfmSVeJT5HBGTND6rbcZ_lY51VGHma5IJQo4YI4yulZHovVGbA4-tEbc_yMcdp8AmB-SGebcCxEC-2VKcHFdM5KElMHTgZTsRrhuIyqT_KpCM343o88m_aHsKtxG6CpsVugOdcrk2zxAelunzev7_Ao-NaDk
  priority: 102
  providerName: Unpaywall
Title Determination of an optimally sensitive and specific chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI quantification metric in relevant biological phantoms
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-9263HW1R-5/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fnbm.3614
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27686882
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1829786275
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1835447158
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1837318829
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5095597
https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/nbm.3614
UnpaywallVersion publishedVersion
Volume 29
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket)
  issn: 1099-1492
  databaseCode: DR2
  dateStart: 19960101
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  eissn: 1099-1492
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0008432
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3fb9MwELbQKtheEBQYgTEZhOApLHEc23kcG6MgtZoqqo2nyHEcbaJNu6YV2__BH8xdnERUjImXRIovTpT74S_J3XeEvE1UJoO4CH1tAb7xQhW-FpL5WkG0LITR3OB3yOFIDCb863l83mRVYi2M44foPrihZ9TxGh1cZ9XBH6Sh2exDJLCHdS8EGIPWzfhpF4UVr5uTAYJgfsRV0BLPBuygPXNjKerhU72-DWf-nS65vS4X-uannk43IW29Jp08Ig8bMEkPnfYfk3u27JPto7aHW588GDa_zvvkfp3raaon5NdxmwKDSqHzgmrYQuiYwaVuaIUp7RgE4XBOsRITs4moaZgFqL12xcK0Qk5QN8eqhr92SYfjL_RqrV0GkhubYc8uQy9Liv1ZALivqGN-qmdbXGAX41n1lExOPn07GvhNcwbfAMLjvgkiaYUMOGcSfDrMrJQqMUkulTXWRJlVUVCwHGJIaA3oQ5ucwbt4lvDIgFj0jGyV89I-J9RmPFcyEjLPE15YNCsuRZyHWMcL83nkfaun1DTM5dhAY5o6zmWWgkZT1KhHXneSC8fWcYvMu1rVnYBe_sDsNhmnZ6PPacJENDgLx2nskb3WFtLGsas0xFJkhdTOcK1uGLSK_1l0aedrlIliDot-rO6UkRBOYTaP7Drz6m6IwSuggCGPyA3D6wSQEnxzpLy8qKnBY8co6JE3nYne9SBq2_2nQDr6OMT9i_8VfEl2AE8KV6q5R7ZWy7V9BZhtle3Xzgnb4zHbJ73J6PTw-29390Mh
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1bb9MwFLamTVBeEJRbYIBBCJ7CcnFsRzzBYHSwVGjatL1ZjuNoE21amlZs_4MfzDlxElExJl5aqT51opyLPzvnfIeQV6nMRZCUoa8twDdWytLXXES-lhAtS240M3gOmY356Jh9OU1ON8i7rhbG8UP0B27oGU28RgfHA-mdP1hD8-nbmGMT6y3GQ447r4h968OwZE13MoAQkR8zGXTMs0G00_1zbS3awsd6cRXQ_DtfcrCq5vryp55M1jFtsyjt3SG3WzRJ3zv13yUbthqSwW7XxG1Ibmbtu_MhudEke5r6Hvn1scuBQa3QWUk1fELsmMKlLmmNOe0YBeHngmIpJqYTUdNSC1B74aqFaY2koG6OZYN_7YJmh_v0x0q7FCQ3NsWmXYaeVxQbtAByX1JH_dTMNj_DNsbT-j453vt0tDvy2-4MvgGIx3wTxMJyETAWCXDqMLdCyNSkhZDWWBPnVsZBGRUQREJrQB_aFBFsxvOUxQbE4gdks5pV9hGhNmeFFDEXRZGy0qJdMcGTIsRCXpjPI286PSnTUpdjB42JcqTLkQKNKtSoR170knNH13GFzOtG1b2AXnzH9DaRqJPxZ5VGPB6dhIcq8ch2Zwuq9exahViLLJHbGa7VD4NW8UWLruxshTJxwmDVT-S1MgLiKczmkYfOvPobimAPyGHII2LN8HoB5ARfH6nOzxpu8MRRCnrkZW-i1z2Ixnb_KaDGHzL8fvy_gs_JYHSUHaiD_fHXJ-QWgEvu6ja3yeZysbJPAcAt82eNo_4GExdD9A
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLamTWy8DCiXBQYYhOApXS5O7IgnWCkd0ApVTNsDkuU4jjatTUsvYuN38IM5J04ChTEhXlqp_urW9vHJ5-Sc7xDyLBEp96Lcd5UB-sZykbsq5oGrBHjLPNaKabwP2R_EvUP27jg6XiMv61wYqw_R3HDDnVH6a9zgZprle7-ohqbjdhhjEesNFiUC4_k6w5_aUYKV1cmAQgRuyIRXK896wV79zZVr0QZO6_llRPPPeMmtZTFVF1_VaLTKacuLUvcG-VwPx8ainLWXi7Stv_2m9Pif471JtiuySl9Z67pF1kzRIlv7dY24FtnsV4_mW-RaGUuq57fJ904dYoOLTic5VfAKrmkMI7mgcwyZRycLH2cUMz0xWonqSrmAmnObjEznqDlq-1iU9NrMaH94QL8slY1wsm1jrAmm6WlBsf4LHAwW1CpLlb1NT7BK8nh-hxx233za77lV8QdXA4NkrvZCbmLuMRZw8Bl-ajgXiU4yLow2OkyNCL08yMBH-UbDciudBXDWTxMWaoCFd8l6MSnMDqEmZZngYcyzLGG5QbNlPI4yH_OEoT-HvKjNQOpKGR0LdIyk1XQOJEy9xKl3yJMGObVqIJdgnpeW1ADU7Ayj53gkjwZvZRLEYe_IH8rIIbu1qcnKccylj6nOAqWj4beaZlhVfI6jCjNZIiaMGJCKSFyJ4eCuoTeH3LPW2_yhAI6YMTQ5hK_YdQNAyfHVluL0pJQej6xioUOeNjvgqoko7fmvADl43cf3-_8KfEw2P3a68sPB4P0Dch2oa2yzQnfJ-mK2NA-BHi7SR6Ub-AGQlGP2
linkToUnpaywall http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED-hVjBe-CgfCwxkEIKnlCZx7ORxDEZBaoUmqo2nyHEcbVqbdm0qNv4O_mDu4iRaYUxIvKRSfL3U7vn8c3z3O4BXcZTKQZh7rjII33ge5a4S0ndVhN4yF1pxTe8hR2MxnPDPR-HRpVwYCqu0HBHtSzeaHZXPpkm-yHLr6-sTfv9tkc76gaBa1l0RIh7vQHcy_rL7zZLs-W7AI0tJEMcubgf8hoH20lc31qQuDe_5VYDzz7jJrXWxUBff1XS6iW2rxWn_LuimWzYm5bS_LtO-_vEb4-P_9fse3KmxK9u1xnYfbpiiB1t7Tcm4Htwa1Sf1PbhZhZbq1QP4-b6JuCEbYPOcKbyip5phhy7YiiLoyefi7YxR4icFLzFdExkwc25zk9mKKEitjrJC22bJRgef2Nla2YAn2zajEmGanRSMysHgPqFklmiq0rY4pqLJs9VDmOx_-Lo3dOtaEK5GQMldPQikEXLAuS_RhXipkTKKdZzJyGijg9REwSD3M3RZntEIbJTOfNz6pzEPNIoFj6BTzAuzDcykPItkIGSWxTw3ZMVcijDzKG0Y9TnwprGGRNdE6VSvY5pYimc_waFPaOgdeNFKLiw5yBUyryuDagXU8pSC6WSYHI4_JrEvguGhd5CEDuw0FpfUfmSVeJT5HBGTND6rbcZ_lY51VGHma5IJQo4YI4yulZHovVGbA4-tEbc_yMcdp8AmB-SGebcCxEC-2VKcHFdM5KElMHTgZTsRrhuIyqT_KpCM343o88m_aHsKtxG6CpsVugOdcrk2zxAelunzev7_Ao-NaDk
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination+of+an+optimally+sensitive+and+specific+chemical+exchange+saturation+transfer+MRI+quantification+metric+in+relevant+biological+phantoms&rft.jtitle=NMR+in+biomedicine&rft.au=Ray%2C+Kevin+J.&rft.au=Larkin%2C+James+R.&rft.au=Tee%2C+Yee+K.&rft.au=Khrapitchev%2C+Alexandre+A.&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.issn=0952-3480&rft.eissn=1099-1492&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1624&rft.epage=1633&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fnbm.3614&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fnbm.3614&rft.externalDocID=NBM3614
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0952-3480&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0952-3480&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0952-3480&client=summon