Prognostic Models in Growth-Hormone- and Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review

• Published in: Diagnostics (Basel) Vol. 13; no. 12; p. 2118
• Main Authors: Dumitriu-Stan, Roxana-Ioana, Burcea, Iulia-Florentina, Salmen, Teodor, Poiana, Catalina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.06.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Age; Artificial intelligence; Brain cancer; Classification; Cytokeratin; GH-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor; Growth; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neuroendocrine tumors; Pathology; pituitary neuroendocrine tumor; Postoperative period; prognostic factors; Prolactin; prolactinoma; Sinuses; Somatotropin; Surgical outcomes; Systematic Review; Transcription factors; Tumors; GH-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor; prognostic factors; prolactinoma; pituitary neuroendocrine tumor
• ISSN: 2075-4418; 2075-4418
• DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13122118

Growth-hormone (GH)- and prolactin (PRL)-secreting PitNETs (pituitary neuroendocrine tumors) are divided into multiple histological subtypes, which determine their clinical and biological variable behavior. Proliferation markers alone have a questionable degree of prediction, so we try to identify validated prognostic models as accurately as possible. (1) Background: The data available so far show that the use of staging and clinical–pathological classification of PitNETs, along with imaging, are useful in predicting the evolution of these tumors. So far, there is no consensus for certain markers that could predict tumor evolution. The application of the WHO (World Health Organisation) classification in practice needs to be further evaluated and validated. (2) Methods: We performed the CRD42023401959 protocol in Prospero with a systematic literature search in PubMed and Web of Science databases and included original full-text articles (randomized control trials and clinical trials) from the last 10 years, published in English, and the search used the following keywords: (i) pituitary adenoma AND (prognosis OR outcome OR prediction), (ii) growth hormone pituitary adenoma AND (prognosis OR outcome OR prediction), (iii) prolactin pituitary adenoma AND (prognosis OR outcome OR prediction); (iv) mammosomatotroph adenoma AND (prognosis OR outcome OR prediction). (3) Results: Two researchers extracted the articles of interest and if any disagreements occurred in the selection process, these were settled by a third reviewer. The articles were then assessed using the ROBIS bias assessment and 75 articles were included. (4) Conclusions: the clinical–pathological classification along with factors such as GH, IGF-1, prolactin levels both preoperatively and postoperatively offer valuable information.