The Impact of Workaround Difficulty on Frontline Employees’ Response to Operational Failures: A Laboratory Experiment on Medication Administration

Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inManagement science Vol. 62; no. 4; pp. 1124 - 1144
Main Author Tucker, Anita L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Linthicum INFORMS 01.04.2016
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0025-1909
1526-5501
DOI10.1287/mnsc.2015.2170

Cover

Abstract Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where, unknown to them, two medication administration supplies are missing. We observe their real-time responses to the two failures and whether they contribute an improvement idea. We randomly assign half of the participants to an experiment location far away from a satellite pharmacy where the missing supplies can be obtained (“difficult condition”), and the other half are located near the satellite pharmacy (“easy condition”). Both conditions contain risky, against-policy supplies that can be used to complete the work tasks, giving participants a choice between policy-compliant workarounds and risky, against-policy workarounds. In the first study, we find that participants in the difficult condition are more likely to contribute improvement ideas but are less likely to use policy-compliant workarounds. A second experiment with a 2 × 2 design shows that participants in the difficult condition who have high access to the process owner are more likely to use policy-compliant workarounds than when they have low access. Our results suggest that hospitals can increase communication about operational failures by deliberately making it difficult to work around them while simultaneously providing a high level of access to process owners. Otherwise, nurses encountering operational failures are likely to resort to against-policy workarounds, a behavior observed in practice. This paper was accepted by Serguei Netessine, operations management .
AbstractList Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where, unknown to them, two medication administration supplies are missing. We observe their real-time responses to the two failures and whether they contribute an improvement idea. We randomly assign half of the participants to an experiment location far away from a satellite pharmacy where the missing supplies can be obtained ("difficult condition"), and the other half are located near the satellite pharmacy ("easy condition"). Both conditions contain risky, against-policy supplies that can be used to complete the work tasks, giving participants a choice between policy- compliant workarounds and risky, against-policy workarounds. In the first study, we find that participants in the difficult condition are more likely to contribute improvement ideas but are less likely to use policy-compliant workarounds. A second experiment with a 2 x 2 design shows that participants in the difficult condition who have high access to the process owner are more likely to use policy-compliant workarounds than when they have low access. Our results suggest that hospitals can increase communication about operational failures by deliberately making it difficult to work around them while simultaneously providing a high level of access to process owners. Otherwise, nurses encountering operational failures are likely to resort to against-policy workarounds, a behavior observed in practice.
Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where, unknown to them, two medication administration supplies are missing. We observe their real-time responses to the two failures and whether they contribute an improvement idea. We randomly assign half of the participants to an experiment location far away from a satellite pharmacy where the missing supplies can be obtained ("difficult condition"), and the other half are located near the satellite pharmacy ("easy condition"). Both conditions contain risky, against-policy supplies that can be used to complete the work tasks, giving participants a choice between policycompliant workarounds and risky, against-policy workarounds. In the first study, we find that participants in the difficult condition are more likely to contribute improvement ideas but are less likely to use policy-compliant workarounds. A second experiment with a 2 × 2 design shows that participants in the difficult condition who have high access to the process owner are more likely to use policy-compliant workarounds than when they have low access. Our results suggest that hospitals can increase communication about operational failures by deliberately making it difficult to work around them while simultaneously providing a high level of access to process owners. Otherwise, nurses encountering operational failures are likely to resort to against-policy workarounds, a behavior observed in practice.
Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where, unknown to them, two medication administration supplies are missing. We observe their real-time responses to the two failures and whether they contribute an improvement idea. We randomly assign half of the participants to an experiment location far away from a satellite pharmacy where the missing supplies can be obtained ("difficult condition"), and the other half are located near the satellite pharmacy ("easy condition"). Both conditions contain risky, against-policy supplies that can be used to complete the work tasks, giving participants a choice between policy- compliant workarounds and risky, against-policy workarounds. In the first study, we find that participants in the difficult condition are more likely to contribute improvement ideas but are less likely to use policy-compliant workarounds. A second experiment with a 2 x 2 design shows that participants in the difficult condition who have high access to the process owner are more likely to use policy-compliant workarounds than when they have low access. Our results suggest that hospitals can increase communication about operational failures by deliberately making it difficult to work around them while simultaneously providing a high level of access to process owners. Otherwise, nurses encountering operational failures are likely to resort to against-policy workarounds, a behavior observed in practice. Keywords: healthcare: hospitals; organizational studies: behavior; reliability: quality control History: Received November 19, 2012; accepted January 7, 2015, by Serguei Netessine, operations management. Published online in Articles in Advance September 1, 2015.
Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where, unknown to them, two medication administration supplies are missing. We observe their real-time responses to the two failures and whether they contribute an improvement idea. We randomly assign half of the participants to an experiment location far away from a satellite pharmacy where the missing supplies can be obtained ("difficult condition"), and the other half are located near the satellite pharmacy ("easy condition"). Both conditions contain risky, against-policy supplies that can be used to complete the work tasks, giving participants a choice between policy-compliant workarounds and risky, against-policy workarounds. In the first study, we find that participants in the difficult condition are more likely to contribute improvement ideas but are less likely to use policy-compliant workarounds. A second experiment with a 2 × 2 design shows that participants in the difficult condition who have high access to the process owner are more likely to use policy-compliant workarounds than when they have low access. Our results suggest that hospitals can increase communication about operational failures by deliberately making it difficult to work around them while simultaneously providing a high level of access to process owners. Otherwise, nurses encountering operational failures are likely to resort to against-policy workarounds, a behavior observed in practice.
Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where, unknown to them, two medication administration supplies are missing. We observe their real-time responses to the two failures and whether they contribute an improvement idea. We randomly assign half of the participants to an experiment location far away from a satellite pharmacy where the missing supplies can be obtained (“difficult condition”), and the other half are located near the satellite pharmacy (“easy condition”). Both conditions contain risky, against-policy supplies that can be used to complete the work tasks, giving participants a choice between policy-compliant workarounds and risky, against-policy workarounds. In the first study, we find that participants in the difficult condition are more likely to contribute improvement ideas but are less likely to use policy-compliant workarounds. A second experiment with a 2 × 2 design shows that participants in the difficult condition who have high access to the process owner are more likely to use policy-compliant workarounds than when they have low access. Our results suggest that hospitals can increase communication about operational failures by deliberately making it difficult to work around them while simultaneously providing a high level of access to process owners. Otherwise, nurses encountering operational failures are likely to resort to against-policy workarounds, a behavior observed in practice. This paper was accepted by Serguei Netessine, operations management .
Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where, unknown to them, two medication administration supplies are missing. We observe their real-time responses to the two failures and whether they contribute an improvement idea. We randomly assign half of the participants to an experiment location far away from a satellite pharmacy where the missing supplies can be obtained (“difficult condition”), and the other half are located near the satellite pharmacy (“easy condition”). Both conditions contain risky, against-policy supplies that can be used to complete the work tasks, giving participants a choice between policy-compliant workarounds and risky, against-policy workarounds. In the first study, we find that participants in the difficult condition are more likely to contribute improvement ideas but are less likely to use policy-compliant workarounds. A second experiment with a 2 × 2 design shows that participants in the difficult condition who have high access to the process owner are more likely to use policy-compliant workarounds than when they have low access. Our results suggest that hospitals can increase communication about operational failures by deliberately making it difficult to work around them while simultaneously providing a high level of access to process owners. Otherwise, nurses encountering operational failures are likely to resort to against-policy workarounds, a behavior observed in practice. This paper was accepted by Serguei Netessine, operations management.
Audience Trade
Academic
Author Tucker, Anita L.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Anita L.
  surname: Tucker
  fullname: Tucker, Anita L.
BookMark eNqFkl-L1DAUxYus4Ozqq29CQPDJjkma9I9vwzqjCyMLsuJjSdNkNmub1NwUdt78EL749fwkpjOy48CIBBpIf-dwuPecJ2fWWZUkzwmeE1oWb3oLck4x4XNKCvwomRFO85RzTM6SGcaUp6TC1ZPkHOAOY1yURT5LftzcKnTVD0IG5DT64vxX4d1oW_TOaG3k2IUtchatvLOhM1ahZT90bqsU_Pr-E31SMDgLCgWHrgflRTDOig6thOlGr-AtWqC1aFz84fwWLe8jY3plw-T5UbVG7hRo0fbGGgh7g6fJYy06UM_-3BfJ59Xy5vJDur5-f3W5WKeS5yykHAtWZpqRPGtzXNCmKVmVC6VKrjHN81Yw3rCGVJpVsuGSNpTFEWjS6IKWLc8ukpd738G7b6OCUN-50cf8UNO8KAkuc1IdqI3oVG2sdjGm7A3IesE4rqoy21HpCWqjbBxKFxelTXw-4ucn-Hha1Rt5UvDqSBCZoO7DRowA9TH4-i-wGSFuDeIHzOY2wJ4_wtkel94BeKVracJuDTGQ6WqC66le9VSveqpXPdXrkP9BNsTNCr_9t-DFXnAHsQsPNMvKjGNGDgOcZuF7-J_fb40D7Vs
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1287_msom_2022_1089
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4073723
crossref_primary_10_5465_annals_2015_0151
crossref_primary_10_1080_10686967_2024_2317473
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjoq_2023_002711
crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2019_3491
crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2023_4829
crossref_primary_10_1287_msom_2019_0826
crossref_primary_10_1002_joom_1024
crossref_primary_10_1097_QMH_0000000000000385
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsis_2020_101596
crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2022_4580
crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2019_3332
crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2019_3419
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4071155
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2642369
crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2022_4331
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3180225
crossref_primary_10_1287_orsc_2018_1274
crossref_primary_10_1177_00018392231174450
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jom_2017_09_001
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3762088
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3440355
crossref_primary_10_1287_msom_2019_0778
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2773707
crossref_primary_10_1287_msom_2019_0812
crossref_primary_10_1111_poms_12758
crossref_primary_10_1002_nop2_1835
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jen_2022_07_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socec_2021_101778
crossref_primary_10_1080_10686967_2018_1404364
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3351961
crossref_primary_10_1287_msom_2019_0808
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11213_019_09513_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_jscm_12195
crossref_primary_10_1136_leader_2023_000937
crossref_primary_10_53730_ijhs_v7nS1_15334
crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2016_2640
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4891595
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2932236
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2992588
crossref_primary_10_1002_joom_1015
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3368317
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12599_023_00846_3
crossref_primary_10_1111_jocn_16110
crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2021_04150
crossref_primary_10_1111_poms_13155
crossref_primary_10_1111_deci_12503
crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2019_3401
crossref_primary_10_1287_msom_2023_1226
crossref_primary_10_1108_IJOPM_07_2020_0482
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3983334
crossref_primary_10_1108_JKM_05_2018_0290
crossref_primary_10_1186_s43058_022_00388_x
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4472407
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbusres_2023_114459
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3456870
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4798100
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3219451
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3556208
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3341370
Cites_doi 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.835
10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181d116c2
10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.011
10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181d41162
10.1177/014920630002600304
10.1016/j.econlet.2010.02.014
10.1016/S1553-7250(06)32063-6
10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428
10.1197/jamia.M1471
10.1080/10686967.2009.11918248
10.2307/41166165
10.5465/amj.2007.26279183
10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.836
10.1016/S1553-7250(07)33043-2
10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.838
10.1287/mnsc.1070.0733
10.1097/01.HMR.0000296785.29718.5d
10.1007/s10111-012-0229-4
10.1097/01.NNR.0000270028.75112.00
10.1037/h0034088
10.1016/j.jom.2010.09.001
10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6
10.1111/1467-6486.00383
10.1007/s00267-012-9937-z
10.1001/jama.283.22.2948
10.1001/jama.297.8.871
10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00320-7
10.2307/257011
10.5465/amj.2011.61967925
10.1037/a0016557
10.1177/0001839212453028
10.1197/jamia.M2616
10.1287/mnsc.1060.0530
10.2307/256630
10.7326/0003-4819-142-8-200504190-00011
10.1287/msom.1060.0156
10.1016/S1553-7250(05)31032-4
10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.385
10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00421.x
10.1177/1536867X0300300305
10.1111/1467-6486.00386
10.1097/00152193-198704000-00014
10.1287/orsc.1080.0405
10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00959.x
10.1197/jamia.M2378
10.1080/00220489809595921
10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429
10.1287/orsc.1110.0732
10.5465/19416520903047327
10.1136/qshc.2006.020131
10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
10.1145/1056808.1056966
10.1016/j.jom.2010.11.005
10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1301
10.2307/258391
10.1287/mnsc.44.12.1595
10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1385.12084
10.1016/S1553-7250(05)31031-2
10.1016/S1474-8231(02)03007-0
10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853
10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
10.1097/01.HMR.0000304495.95522.ca
10.1287/orsc.11.1.102.12566
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2016 INFORMS
COPYRIGHT 2016 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
COPYRIGHT 2016 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Apr 2016
Copyright_xml – notice: 2016 INFORMS
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2016 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2016 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
– notice: Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Apr 2016
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
N95
8BJ
FQK
JBE
DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2170
DatabaseName CrossRef
Gale Business: Insights
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
DatabaseTitleList



International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)


CrossRef
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Business
EISSN 1526-5501
EndPage 1144
ExternalDocumentID A450998319
10_1287_mnsc_2015_2170
43835041
mnsc.2015.2170
Genre Research Article
GroupedDBID 08R
0R1
1AW
1OL
29M
2AX
3EH
3R3
3V.
4
4.4
41
5GY
6XO
7WY
7X5
85S
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FL
8VB
AABCJ
AAIKC
AAPBV
AAYJJ
ABBHK
ABEFU
ABIVO
ABNOP
ABPPZ
ABSIS
ABTRL
ABUFD
ABUWG
ABZEH
ACDCL
ACHQT
ACNCT
ACTDY
ACVYA
ACYGS
ADBBV
ADDCT
ADGDI
ADNFJ
AEILP
AENEX
AETEA
AEUPB
AFDAS
AFFDN
AFFNX
AFKRA
AJPNJ
AKVCP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AQNXB
AQSKT
AQUVI
AZQEC
B-7
BBAFP
BENPR
BEZIV
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CBXGM
CCKSF
CS3
CWXUR
CYVLN
DU5
DWQXO
EBA
EBE
EBO
EBR
EBS
EBU
ECR
EHE
EJD
EMK
EPL
F20
F5P
FH7
FRNLG
FYUFA
G8K
GENNL
GNUQQ
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_ARCHIVE
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_RESEARCH
GUPYA
HGD
HVGLF
H~9
IAO
IEA
IGG
IOF
IPO
ISM
ITC
JAV
JBC
JPL
JSODD
JST
K6
K60
L8O
LI
M0C
M0T
M2M
MV1
N95
NEJ
NIEAY
P-O
P2P
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PROAC
QWB
REX
RNS
RPU
SA0
SJN
TH9
TN5
U5U
UKR
VOH
VQA
WH7
X
XFK
XHC
XI7
XXP
XZL
Y99
YCJ
YNT
YZZ
ZCG
ZL0
-~X
18M
AAAZS
AAMNW
AAWTO
AAXLS
ABAWQ
ABDNZ
ABKVW
ABLWH
ABXSQ
ABYYQ
ACGFO
ACHJO
ACXJH
ADEPB
ADMHG
ADNWM
ADULT
AEGXH
AEMOZ
AFAIT
AFTQD
AGKTX
AHAJD
AHQJS
AIAGR
ALIPV
APTMU
ASMEE
BAAKF
IPC
IPSME
IPY
ISL
JAAYA
JBMMH
JBZCM
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLEZI
JLXEF
JPPEU
K1G
K6~
OFU
XSW
.-4
41~
AADHG
AAYXX
ABDPE
CCPQU
CITATION
LPU
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PSYQQ
PUEGO
UKHRP
YYP
8BJ
FQK
JBE
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-50a483f4163d6072bb8496aee85f0266da45b4b19f49cb5c2b24190f1bf728d53
ISSN 0025-1909
IngestDate Sat Aug 16 18:52:00 EDT 2025
Mon Oct 20 22:35:07 EDT 2025
Thu Jun 12 23:34:06 EDT 2025
Mon Oct 20 16:28:04 EDT 2025
Thu Oct 16 15:57:35 EDT 2025
Fri May 23 01:12:42 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 03:27:51 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:50:18 EDT 2025
Thu May 29 13:19:49 EDT 2025
Tue Jan 05 23:25:59 EST 2021
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c564t-50a483f4163d6072bb8496aee85f0266da45b4b19f49cb5c2b24190f1bf728d53
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
PQID 2678108619
PQPubID 40737
PageCount 21
ParticipantIDs informs_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2015_2170
gale_infotracmisc_A450998319
gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A450998319
crossref_citationtrail_10_1287_mnsc_2015_2170
jstor_primary_43835041
proquest_journals_2678108619
gale_businessinsightsgauss_A450998319
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A450998319
gale_incontextgauss__A450998319
crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2015_2170
ProviderPackageCode Y99
RPU
NIEAY
CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Linthicum
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Linthicum
PublicationTitle Management science
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher INFORMS
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Publisher_xml – name: INFORMS
– name: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
References B20
B64
B21
B65
B22
B66
B23
B67
B24
B68
B25
B69
B26
B27
B28
B29
B70
B71
B72
B73
B30
B74
B31
B75
B32
B76
B33
B77
B34
B78
B35
B79
B36
B37
B38
B39
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8
B9
B80
B40
B41
B42
B43
B44
B45
B46
B47
B48
B49
B50
B51
B52
B53
B10
B54
B11
B55
B12
B56
B13
B57
B14
B58
B15
B59
B16
B17
B18
B19
B60
B61
B62
B63
Liker J (B43) 2004
McGuire E (B46) 2006; 24
Greene WH (B27) 2000
Vroom VH (B73) 1995
Cumbie J (B15) 2012
Ashford SJ (B3) 2009
Womack JP (B77) 1990
Kotter JP (B41) 1995; 73
Boyle S (B6) 2004; 22
Wysocki BJ (B78) 2004
Spear SJ (B63) 2004; 82
Imai M (B37) 1986
Connolly C (B13) 2005
References_xml – ident: B12
– ident: B35
– ident: B60
– ident: B3
– ident: B41
– ident: B68
– ident: B45
– ident: B7
– ident: B29
– ident: B64
– ident: B73
– ident: B25
– ident: B50
– ident: B21
– ident: B16
– ident: B77
– ident: B31
– ident: B58
– ident: B39
– ident: B54
– ident: B61
– ident: B59
– ident: B13
– ident: B2
– ident: B40
– ident: B69
– ident: B28
– ident: B44
– ident: B49
– ident: B65
– ident: B6
– ident: B24
– ident: B48
– ident: B17
– ident: B30
– ident: B34
– ident: B51
– ident: B76
– ident: B38
– ident: B55
– ident: B72
– ident: B9
– ident: B14
– ident: B10
– ident: B43
– ident: B66
– ident: B20
– ident: B1
– ident: B27
– ident: B62
– ident: B5
– ident: B47
– ident: B23
– ident: B18
– ident: B79
– ident: B33
– ident: B52
– ident: B75
– ident: B37
– ident: B56
– ident: B71
– ident: B8
– ident: B36
– ident: B11
– ident: B42
– ident: B67
– ident: B26
– ident: B4
– ident: B46
– ident: B63
– ident: B80
– ident: B22
– ident: B32
– ident: B15
– ident: B78
– ident: B57
– ident: B70
– ident: B19
– ident: B53
– ident: B74
– ident: B52
  doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.835
– ident: B33
  doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181d116c2
– ident: B55
  doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.011
– ident: B34
  doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181d41162
– ident: B14
  doi: 10.1177/014920630002600304
– ident: B28
  doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.02.014
– ident: B62
  doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(06)32063-6
– ident: B5
  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428
– ident: B2
  doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1471
– ident: B59
  doi: 10.1080/10686967.2009.11918248
– ident: B68
  doi: 10.2307/41166165
– ident: B16
  doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.26279183
– ident: B47
  doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.836
– ident: B23
  doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(07)33043-2
– ident: B54
  doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.838
– ident: B75
  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0733
– ident: B44
  doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000296785.29718.5d
– ident: B36
  doi: 10.1007/s10111-012-0229-4
– volume-title: The Machine That Changed the World
  year: 1990
  ident: B77
– ident: B29
  doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000270028.75112.00
– ident: B60
  doi: 10.1037/h0034088
– ident: B70
  doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2010.09.001
– ident: B1
  doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6
– ident: B49
  doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00383
– ident: B45
  doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9937-z
– ident: B8
  doi: 10.1001/jama.283.22.2948
– ident: B10
  doi: 10.1001/jama.297.8.871
– ident: B76
  doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00320-7
– volume-title: Kaizen: The Key to Japan’s Competitive Success
  year: 1986
  ident: B37
– volume: 24
  start-page: 179
  issue: 4
  year: 2006
  ident: B46
  publication-title: Nursing Econom.
– ident: B50
  doi: 10.2307/257011
– ident: B17
  doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.61967925
– ident: B35
  doi: 10.1037/a0016557
– ident: B4
  doi: 10.1177/0001839212453028
– ident: B40
  doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2616
– ident: B30
  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0530
– ident: B22
  doi: 10.2307/256630
– ident: B64
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-8-200504190-00011
– ident: B66
  doi: 10.1287/msom.1060.0156
– ident: B38
  doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(05)31032-4
– ident: B48
  doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.385
– volume-title: Speaking Up and Speaking Out: The Leadership Dynamics of Voice in Organizations
  year: 2009
  ident: B3
– volume: 22
  start-page: 111
  issue: 3
  year: 2004
  ident: B6
  publication-title: Nursing Econom.
– start-page: A1
  issue: 9
  year: 2004
  ident: B78
  publication-title: Wall Street Journal
– ident: B80
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00421.x
– ident: B11
  doi: 10.1177/1536867X0300300305
– ident: B20
  doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00386
– ident: B12
  doi: 10.1097/00152193-198704000-00014
– ident: B18
  doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0405
– volume-title: Econometric Analysis
  year: 2000
  ident: B27
– volume-title: Work and Motivation
  year: 1995
  ident: B73
– ident: B58
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00959.x
– ident: B71
  doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2378
– ident: B26
  doi: 10.1080/00220489809595921
– ident: B72
  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429
– ident: B9
  doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0732
– ident: B25
  doi: 10.5465/19416520903047327
– ident: B79
  doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020131
– ident: B31
  doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
– ident: B39
  doi: 10.1145/1056808.1056966
– ident: B65
  doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2010.11.005
– ident: B21
  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1301
– ident: B7
  doi: 10.2307/258391
– volume: 73
  start-page: 59
  issue: 2
  year: 1995
  ident: B41
  publication-title: Harvard Bus. Rev.
– ident: B61
  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.44.12.1595
– ident: B53
  doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
– ident: B56
  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1385.12084
– ident: B57
  doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(05)31031-2
– start-page: A01
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  ident: B13
  publication-title: Washington Post
– volume: 82
  start-page: 78
  issue: 5
  year: 2004
  ident: B63
  publication-title: Harvard Bus. Rev.
– ident: B67
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-8231(02)03007-0
– ident: B42
  doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853
– ident: B74
  doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
– ident: B24
  doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
– ident: B32
  doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000304495.95522.ca
– volume-title: The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer
  year: 2004
  ident: B43
– issue: 17
  year: 2012
  ident: B15
  publication-title: PR Newswire.com
– ident: B69
  doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.1.102.12566
SSID ssj0007876
Score 2.3983896
Snippet Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate...
SourceID proquest
gale
crossref
jstor
informs
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 1124
SubjectTerms Access
Drug administration
Drugs
Experiments
Failure analysis
healthcare: hospitals
Hospitals
Laboratories
Management
Nurses
Operations management
organizational studies: behavior
Owners
Pharmacy
Policy making
Real time
Recurrence
reliability: quality control
Work environment
Title The Impact of Workaround Difficulty on Frontline Employees’ Response to Operational Failures: A Laboratory Experiment on Medication Administration
URI https://www.jstor.org/stable/43835041
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2678108619
Volume 62
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  eissn: 1526-5501
  dateEnd: 20201101
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0007876
  issn: 0025-1909
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 19870101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9RAEF-OK4ovxa_i2ar7oN6DpOZjN9n4dkpLEawiLfQt7CabImhSLjlQ_wz_Ymc2m2xCT6y-hCMMm2zmdzOzu7-ZIeR5USZ4Opd4udSFxwRTngx87SUC42eRpNLsQ344jU_O2fsLfjGbfR-xljatOsx_bs0r-R-twj3QK2bJ_oNmh0HhBvwG_cIVNAzXG-vYpTkixUqusU2SaXtiimr8wMOAEosUmHBS2_6-hjqx7uixpndGfaXX_bZgKb8gV73p8qAtSvAo3nUDwFHNqXwHHzmpwDuOdx275pX1tdcJHSuwKtJmP9j9hyAe0VbMmnTgNCAt8mP_ts3AHByYoKMnWrs13o7EtroQnKRjyxyHIwSykZmFIJFttf8h7qAcf6sarE4Z8ENYcPnO0w38wxWDOCkVEdaL3QnBH_hzsvP26PTT58GLgyGL-3a_-F624Cc84PV0-ElAY936ra7qbdOTXK85ehO9nN0lu3bZQVcdhu6Rma7uk9t91sMD8gugRDso0bqkDkrUQYnWFR2gRAcoLWkPJNrWdAQk2gPpDZXUwYg6GOGIDkZ0CqOH5Pz46OzdiWfbdXg5j1nrcV8yEZUY4Rexn4RKCZbGUmvBS1jpx4VkXDEVpCVLc8XzUEH0mPploMBeiIJHe2Re1ZV-RCgs0iOZwnBFJBjjiYykzjkDowK2Q3CxIF7_zbPc1rLHlipfM1zTgo4y1FGGOspQRwuyHOSvuiouf5R8gSrMbAtYuDS4SdZcyk3TZA43C_LMyGEJlQo5Wp3ARGJpJcoa3i2XNt8FZogl1yaSLyeSl13B-W2CBxNB8AT5dByLu79Ocs_AchDDesXcZwE8oMdpZu1ck4UQz2I_tiB9fOMp7ZM7zlYckHm73ugnEL236qn9o_0GeKb4kw
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+impact+of+workaround+difficulty+on+frontline+employees%27+response+to+operational+failures%3A+a+laboratory+experiment+on+medication+administration&rft.jtitle=Management+science&rft.au=Tucker%2C+Anita+L&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.pub=Institute+for+Operations+Research+and+the+Management+Sciences&rft.issn=0025-1909&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1124&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287%2Fmnsc.2015.2170&rft.externalDocID=A450998319
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0025-1909&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0025-1909&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0025-1909&client=summon