The Impact of Workaround Difficulty on Frontline Employees’ Response to Operational Failures: A Laboratory Experiment on Medication Administration
Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where...
Saved in:
| Published in | Management science Vol. 62; no. 4; pp. 1124 - 1144 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Linthicum
INFORMS
01.04.2016
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0025-1909 1526-5501 |
| DOI | 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2170 |
Cover
| Abstract | Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where, unknown to them, two medication administration supplies are missing. We observe their real-time responses to the two failures and whether they contribute an improvement idea. We randomly assign half of the participants to an experiment location far away from a satellite pharmacy where the missing supplies can be obtained (“difficult condition”), and the other half are located near the satellite pharmacy (“easy condition”). Both conditions contain risky, against-policy supplies that can be used to complete the work tasks, giving participants a choice between policy-compliant workarounds and risky, against-policy workarounds. In the first study, we find that participants in the difficult condition are more likely to contribute improvement ideas but are less likely to use policy-compliant workarounds. A second experiment with a 2 × 2 design shows that participants in the difficult condition who have high access to the process owner are more likely to use policy-compliant workarounds than when they have low access. Our results suggest that hospitals can increase communication about operational failures by deliberately making it difficult to work around them while simultaneously providing a high level of access to process owners. Otherwise, nurses encountering operational failures are likely to resort to against-policy workarounds, a behavior observed in practice.
This paper was accepted by Serguei Netessine, operations management
. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where, unknown to them, two medication administration supplies are missing. We observe their real-time responses to the two failures and whether they contribute an improvement idea. We randomly assign half of the participants to an experiment location far away from a satellite pharmacy where the missing supplies can be obtained ("difficult condition"), and the other half are located near the satellite pharmacy ("easy condition"). Both conditions contain risky, against-policy supplies that can be used to complete the work tasks, giving participants a choice between policy- compliant workarounds and risky, against-policy workarounds. In the first study, we find that participants in the difficult condition are more likely to contribute improvement ideas but are less likely to use policy-compliant workarounds. A second experiment with a 2 x 2 design shows that participants in the difficult condition who have high access to the process owner are more likely to use policy-compliant workarounds than when they have low access. Our results suggest that hospitals can increase communication about operational failures by deliberately making it difficult to work around them while simultaneously providing a high level of access to process owners. Otherwise, nurses encountering operational failures are likely to resort to against-policy workarounds, a behavior observed in practice. Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where, unknown to them, two medication administration supplies are missing. We observe their real-time responses to the two failures and whether they contribute an improvement idea. We randomly assign half of the participants to an experiment location far away from a satellite pharmacy where the missing supplies can be obtained ("difficult condition"), and the other half are located near the satellite pharmacy ("easy condition"). Both conditions contain risky, against-policy supplies that can be used to complete the work tasks, giving participants a choice between policycompliant workarounds and risky, against-policy workarounds. In the first study, we find that participants in the difficult condition are more likely to contribute improvement ideas but are less likely to use policy-compliant workarounds. A second experiment with a 2 × 2 design shows that participants in the difficult condition who have high access to the process owner are more likely to use policy-compliant workarounds than when they have low access. Our results suggest that hospitals can increase communication about operational failures by deliberately making it difficult to work around them while simultaneously providing a high level of access to process owners. Otherwise, nurses encountering operational failures are likely to resort to against-policy workarounds, a behavior observed in practice. Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where, unknown to them, two medication administration supplies are missing. We observe their real-time responses to the two failures and whether they contribute an improvement idea. We randomly assign half of the participants to an experiment location far away from a satellite pharmacy where the missing supplies can be obtained ("difficult condition"), and the other half are located near the satellite pharmacy ("easy condition"). Both conditions contain risky, against-policy supplies that can be used to complete the work tasks, giving participants a choice between policy- compliant workarounds and risky, against-policy workarounds. In the first study, we find that participants in the difficult condition are more likely to contribute improvement ideas but are less likely to use policy-compliant workarounds. A second experiment with a 2 x 2 design shows that participants in the difficult condition who have high access to the process owner are more likely to use policy-compliant workarounds than when they have low access. Our results suggest that hospitals can increase communication about operational failures by deliberately making it difficult to work around them while simultaneously providing a high level of access to process owners. Otherwise, nurses encountering operational failures are likely to resort to against-policy workarounds, a behavior observed in practice. Keywords: healthcare: hospitals; organizational studies: behavior; reliability: quality control History: Received November 19, 2012; accepted January 7, 2015, by Serguei Netessine, operations management. Published online in Articles in Advance September 1, 2015. Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where, unknown to them, two medication administration supplies are missing. We observe their real-time responses to the two failures and whether they contribute an improvement idea. We randomly assign half of the participants to an experiment location far away from a satellite pharmacy where the missing supplies can be obtained ("difficult condition"), and the other half are located near the satellite pharmacy ("easy condition"). Both conditions contain risky, against-policy supplies that can be used to complete the work tasks, giving participants a choice between policy-compliant workarounds and risky, against-policy workarounds. In the first study, we find that participants in the difficult condition are more likely to contribute improvement ideas but are less likely to use policy-compliant workarounds. A second experiment with a 2 × 2 design shows that participants in the difficult condition who have high access to the process owner are more likely to use policy-compliant workarounds than when they have low access. Our results suggest that hospitals can increase communication about operational failures by deliberately making it difficult to work around them while simultaneously providing a high level of access to process owners. Otherwise, nurses encountering operational failures are likely to resort to against-policy workarounds, a behavior observed in practice. Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where, unknown to them, two medication administration supplies are missing. We observe their real-time responses to the two failures and whether they contribute an improvement idea. We randomly assign half of the participants to an experiment location far away from a satellite pharmacy where the missing supplies can be obtained (“difficult condition”), and the other half are located near the satellite pharmacy (“easy condition”). Both conditions contain risky, against-policy supplies that can be used to complete the work tasks, giving participants a choice between policy-compliant workarounds and risky, against-policy workarounds. In the first study, we find that participants in the difficult condition are more likely to contribute improvement ideas but are less likely to use policy-compliant workarounds. A second experiment with a 2 × 2 design shows that participants in the difficult condition who have high access to the process owner are more likely to use policy-compliant workarounds than when they have low access. Our results suggest that hospitals can increase communication about operational failures by deliberately making it difficult to work around them while simultaneously providing a high level of access to process owners. Otherwise, nurses encountering operational failures are likely to resort to against-policy workarounds, a behavior observed in practice. This paper was accepted by Serguei Netessine, operations management . Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate the impact of work design factors on responses to operational failures. We use hospital nurses as subjects in a laboratory experiment, where, unknown to them, two medication administration supplies are missing. We observe their real-time responses to the two failures and whether they contribute an improvement idea. We randomly assign half of the participants to an experiment location far away from a satellite pharmacy where the missing supplies can be obtained (“difficult condition”), and the other half are located near the satellite pharmacy (“easy condition”). Both conditions contain risky, against-policy supplies that can be used to complete the work tasks, giving participants a choice between policy-compliant workarounds and risky, against-policy workarounds. In the first study, we find that participants in the difficult condition are more likely to contribute improvement ideas but are less likely to use policy-compliant workarounds. A second experiment with a 2 × 2 design shows that participants in the difficult condition who have high access to the process owner are more likely to use policy-compliant workarounds than when they have low access. Our results suggest that hospitals can increase communication about operational failures by deliberately making it difficult to work around them while simultaneously providing a high level of access to process owners. Otherwise, nurses encountering operational failures are likely to resort to against-policy workarounds, a behavior observed in practice. This paper was accepted by Serguei Netessine, operations management. |
| Audience | Trade Academic |
| Author | Tucker, Anita L. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Anita L. surname: Tucker fullname: Tucker, Anita L. |
| BookMark | eNqFkl-L1DAUxYus4Ozqq29CQPDJjkma9I9vwzqjCyMLsuJjSdNkNmub1NwUdt78EL749fwkpjOy48CIBBpIf-dwuPecJ2fWWZUkzwmeE1oWb3oLck4x4XNKCvwomRFO85RzTM6SGcaUp6TC1ZPkHOAOY1yURT5LftzcKnTVD0IG5DT64vxX4d1oW_TOaG3k2IUtchatvLOhM1ahZT90bqsU_Pr-E31SMDgLCgWHrgflRTDOig6thOlGr-AtWqC1aFz84fwWLe8jY3plw-T5UbVG7hRo0fbGGgh7g6fJYy06UM_-3BfJ59Xy5vJDur5-f3W5WKeS5yykHAtWZpqRPGtzXNCmKVmVC6VKrjHN81Yw3rCGVJpVsuGSNpTFEWjS6IKWLc8ukpd738G7b6OCUN-50cf8UNO8KAkuc1IdqI3oVG2sdjGm7A3IesE4rqoy21HpCWqjbBxKFxelTXw-4ucn-Hha1Rt5UvDqSBCZoO7DRowA9TH4-i-wGSFuDeIHzOY2wJ4_wtkel94BeKVracJuDTGQ6WqC66le9VSveqpXPdXrkP9BNsTNCr_9t-DFXnAHsQsPNMvKjGNGDgOcZuF7-J_fb40D7Vs |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1287_msom_2022_1089 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4073723 crossref_primary_10_5465_annals_2015_0151 crossref_primary_10_1080_10686967_2024_2317473 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjoq_2023_002711 crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2019_3491 crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2023_4829 crossref_primary_10_1287_msom_2019_0826 crossref_primary_10_1002_joom_1024 crossref_primary_10_1097_QMH_0000000000000385 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsis_2020_101596 crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2022_4580 crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2019_3332 crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2019_3419 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4071155 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2642369 crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2022_4331 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3180225 crossref_primary_10_1287_orsc_2018_1274 crossref_primary_10_1177_00018392231174450 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jom_2017_09_001 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3762088 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3440355 crossref_primary_10_1287_msom_2019_0778 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2773707 crossref_primary_10_1287_msom_2019_0812 crossref_primary_10_1111_poms_12758 crossref_primary_10_1002_nop2_1835 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jen_2022_07_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socec_2021_101778 crossref_primary_10_1080_10686967_2018_1404364 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3351961 crossref_primary_10_1287_msom_2019_0808 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11213_019_09513_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_jscm_12195 crossref_primary_10_1136_leader_2023_000937 crossref_primary_10_53730_ijhs_v7nS1_15334 crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2016_2640 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4891595 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2932236 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2992588 crossref_primary_10_1002_joom_1015 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3368317 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12599_023_00846_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_jocn_16110 crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2021_04150 crossref_primary_10_1111_poms_13155 crossref_primary_10_1111_deci_12503 crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2019_3401 crossref_primary_10_1287_msom_2023_1226 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJOPM_07_2020_0482 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3983334 crossref_primary_10_1108_JKM_05_2018_0290 crossref_primary_10_1186_s43058_022_00388_x crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4472407 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbusres_2023_114459 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3456870 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4798100 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3219451 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3556208 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3341370 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.835 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181d116c2 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.011 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181d41162 10.1177/014920630002600304 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.02.014 10.1016/S1553-7250(06)32063-6 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428 10.1197/jamia.M1471 10.1080/10686967.2009.11918248 10.2307/41166165 10.5465/amj.2007.26279183 10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.836 10.1016/S1553-7250(07)33043-2 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.838 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0733 10.1097/01.HMR.0000296785.29718.5d 10.1007/s10111-012-0229-4 10.1097/01.NNR.0000270028.75112.00 10.1037/h0034088 10.1016/j.jom.2010.09.001 10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6 10.1111/1467-6486.00383 10.1007/s00267-012-9937-z 10.1001/jama.283.22.2948 10.1001/jama.297.8.871 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00320-7 10.2307/257011 10.5465/amj.2011.61967925 10.1037/a0016557 10.1177/0001839212453028 10.1197/jamia.M2616 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0530 10.2307/256630 10.7326/0003-4819-142-8-200504190-00011 10.1287/msom.1060.0156 10.1016/S1553-7250(05)31032-4 10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.385 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00421.x 10.1177/1536867X0300300305 10.1111/1467-6486.00386 10.1097/00152193-198704000-00014 10.1287/orsc.1080.0405 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00959.x 10.1197/jamia.M2378 10.1080/00220489809595921 10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429 10.1287/orsc.1110.0732 10.5465/19416520903047327 10.1136/qshc.2006.020131 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7 10.1145/1056808.1056966 10.1016/j.jom.2010.11.005 10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1301 10.2307/258391 10.1287/mnsc.44.12.1595 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636 10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1385.12084 10.1016/S1553-7250(05)31031-2 10.1016/S1474-8231(02)03007-0 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002 10.1097/01.HMR.0000304495.95522.ca 10.1287/orsc.11.1.102.12566 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2016 INFORMS COPYRIGHT 2016 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences COPYRIGHT 2016 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Apr 2016 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2016 INFORMS – notice: COPYRIGHT 2016 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences – notice: COPYRIGHT 2016 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences – notice: Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Apr 2016 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION N95 8BJ FQK JBE |
| DOI | 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2170 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Gale Business: Insights International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) |
| DatabaseTitleList | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) CrossRef |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Business |
| EISSN | 1526-5501 |
| EndPage | 1144 |
| ExternalDocumentID | A450998319 10_1287_mnsc_2015_2170 43835041 mnsc.2015.2170 |
| Genre | Research Article |
| GroupedDBID | 08R 0R1 1AW 1OL 29M 2AX 3EH 3R3 3V. 4 4.4 41 5GY 6XO 7WY 7X5 85S 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8FL 8VB AABCJ AAIKC AAPBV AAYJJ ABBHK ABEFU ABIVO ABNOP ABPPZ ABSIS ABTRL ABUFD ABUWG ABZEH ACDCL ACHQT ACNCT ACTDY ACVYA ACYGS ADBBV ADDCT ADGDI ADNFJ AEILP AENEX AETEA AEUPB AFDAS AFFDN AFFNX AFKRA AJPNJ AKVCP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AQNXB AQSKT AQUVI AZQEC B-7 BBAFP BENPR BEZIV BPHCQ BVXVI CBXGM CCKSF CS3 CWXUR CYVLN DU5 DWQXO EBA EBE EBO EBR EBS EBU ECR EHE EJD EMK EPL F20 F5P FH7 FRNLG FYUFA G8K GENNL GNUQQ GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_ARCHIVE GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_RESEARCH GUPYA HGD HVGLF H~9 IAO IEA IGG IOF IPO ISM ITC JAV JBC JPL JSODD JST K6 K60 L8O LI M0C M0T M2M MV1 N95 NEJ NIEAY P-O P2P PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PROAC QWB REX RNS RPU SA0 SJN TH9 TN5 U5U UKR VOH VQA WH7 X XFK XHC XI7 XXP XZL Y99 YCJ YNT YZZ ZCG ZL0 -~X 18M AAAZS AAMNW AAWTO AAXLS ABAWQ ABDNZ ABKVW ABLWH ABXSQ ABYYQ ACGFO ACHJO ACXJH ADEPB ADMHG ADNWM ADULT AEGXH AEMOZ AFAIT AFTQD AGKTX AHAJD AHQJS AIAGR ALIPV APTMU ASMEE BAAKF IPC IPSME IPY ISL JAAYA JBMMH JBZCM JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLEZI JLXEF JPPEU K1G K6~ OFU XSW .-4 41~ AADHG AAYXX ABDPE CCPQU CITATION LPU PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PQBIZ PQBZA PSYQQ PUEGO UKHRP YYP 8BJ FQK JBE |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-50a483f4163d6072bb8496aee85f0266da45b4b19f49cb5c2b24190f1bf728d53 |
| ISSN | 0025-1909 |
| IngestDate | Sat Aug 16 18:52:00 EDT 2025 Mon Oct 20 22:35:07 EDT 2025 Thu Jun 12 23:34:06 EDT 2025 Mon Oct 20 16:28:04 EDT 2025 Thu Oct 16 15:57:35 EDT 2025 Fri May 23 01:12:42 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 03:27:51 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:50:18 EDT 2025 Thu May 29 13:19:49 EDT 2025 Tue Jan 05 23:25:59 EST 2021 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c564t-50a483f4163d6072bb8496aee85f0266da45b4b19f49cb5c2b24190f1bf728d53 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| PQID | 2678108619 |
| PQPubID | 40737 |
| PageCount | 21 |
| ParticipantIDs | informs_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2015_2170 gale_infotracmisc_A450998319 gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A450998319 crossref_citationtrail_10_1287_mnsc_2015_2170 jstor_primary_43835041 proquest_journals_2678108619 gale_businessinsightsgauss_A450998319 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A450998319 gale_incontextgauss__A450998319 crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2015_2170 |
| ProviderPackageCode | Y99 RPU NIEAY CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2016-04-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-04-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2016 text: 2016-04-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Linthicum |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Linthicum |
| PublicationTitle | Management science |
| PublicationYear | 2016 |
| Publisher | INFORMS Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences |
| Publisher_xml | – name: INFORMS – name: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences |
| References | B20 B64 B21 B65 B22 B66 B23 B67 B24 B68 B25 B69 B26 B27 B28 B29 B70 B71 B72 B73 B30 B74 B31 B75 B32 B76 B33 B77 B34 B78 B35 B79 B36 B37 B38 B39 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B80 B40 B41 B42 B43 B44 B45 B46 B47 B48 B49 B50 B51 B52 B53 B10 B54 B11 B55 B12 B56 B13 B57 B14 B58 B15 B59 B16 B17 B18 B19 B60 B61 B62 B63 Liker J (B43) 2004 McGuire E (B46) 2006; 24 Greene WH (B27) 2000 Vroom VH (B73) 1995 Cumbie J (B15) 2012 Ashford SJ (B3) 2009 Womack JP (B77) 1990 Kotter JP (B41) 1995; 73 Boyle S (B6) 2004; 22 Wysocki BJ (B78) 2004 Spear SJ (B63) 2004; 82 Imai M (B37) 1986 Connolly C (B13) 2005 |
| References_xml | – ident: B12 – ident: B35 – ident: B60 – ident: B3 – ident: B41 – ident: B68 – ident: B45 – ident: B7 – ident: B29 – ident: B64 – ident: B73 – ident: B25 – ident: B50 – ident: B21 – ident: B16 – ident: B77 – ident: B31 – ident: B58 – ident: B39 – ident: B54 – ident: B61 – ident: B59 – ident: B13 – ident: B2 – ident: B40 – ident: B69 – ident: B28 – ident: B44 – ident: B49 – ident: B65 – ident: B6 – ident: B24 – ident: B48 – ident: B17 – ident: B30 – ident: B34 – ident: B51 – ident: B76 – ident: B38 – ident: B55 – ident: B72 – ident: B9 – ident: B14 – ident: B10 – ident: B43 – ident: B66 – ident: B20 – ident: B1 – ident: B27 – ident: B62 – ident: B5 – ident: B47 – ident: B23 – ident: B18 – ident: B79 – ident: B33 – ident: B52 – ident: B75 – ident: B37 – ident: B56 – ident: B71 – ident: B8 – ident: B36 – ident: B11 – ident: B42 – ident: B67 – ident: B26 – ident: B4 – ident: B46 – ident: B63 – ident: B80 – ident: B22 – ident: B32 – ident: B15 – ident: B78 – ident: B57 – ident: B70 – ident: B19 – ident: B53 – ident: B74 – ident: B52 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.835 – ident: B33 doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181d116c2 – ident: B55 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.011 – ident: B34 doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181d41162 – ident: B14 doi: 10.1177/014920630002600304 – ident: B28 doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.02.014 – ident: B62 doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(06)32063-6 – ident: B5 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428 – ident: B2 doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1471 – ident: B59 doi: 10.1080/10686967.2009.11918248 – ident: B68 doi: 10.2307/41166165 – ident: B16 doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.26279183 – ident: B47 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.836 – ident: B23 doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(07)33043-2 – ident: B54 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.838 – ident: B75 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0733 – ident: B44 doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000296785.29718.5d – ident: B36 doi: 10.1007/s10111-012-0229-4 – volume-title: The Machine That Changed the World year: 1990 ident: B77 – ident: B29 doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000270028.75112.00 – ident: B60 doi: 10.1037/h0034088 – ident: B70 doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2010.09.001 – ident: B1 doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6 – ident: B49 doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00383 – ident: B45 doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9937-z – ident: B8 doi: 10.1001/jama.283.22.2948 – ident: B10 doi: 10.1001/jama.297.8.871 – ident: B76 doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00320-7 – volume-title: Kaizen: The Key to Japan’s Competitive Success year: 1986 ident: B37 – volume: 24 start-page: 179 issue: 4 year: 2006 ident: B46 publication-title: Nursing Econom. – ident: B50 doi: 10.2307/257011 – ident: B17 doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.61967925 – ident: B35 doi: 10.1037/a0016557 – ident: B4 doi: 10.1177/0001839212453028 – ident: B40 doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2616 – ident: B30 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0530 – ident: B22 doi: 10.2307/256630 – ident: B64 doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-8-200504190-00011 – ident: B66 doi: 10.1287/msom.1060.0156 – ident: B38 doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(05)31032-4 – ident: B48 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.385 – volume-title: Speaking Up and Speaking Out: The Leadership Dynamics of Voice in Organizations year: 2009 ident: B3 – volume: 22 start-page: 111 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: B6 publication-title: Nursing Econom. – start-page: A1 issue: 9 year: 2004 ident: B78 publication-title: Wall Street Journal – ident: B80 doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00421.x – ident: B11 doi: 10.1177/1536867X0300300305 – ident: B20 doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00386 – ident: B12 doi: 10.1097/00152193-198704000-00014 – ident: B18 doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0405 – volume-title: Econometric Analysis year: 2000 ident: B27 – volume-title: Work and Motivation year: 1995 ident: B73 – ident: B58 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00959.x – ident: B71 doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2378 – ident: B26 doi: 10.1080/00220489809595921 – ident: B72 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429 – ident: B9 doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0732 – ident: B25 doi: 10.5465/19416520903047327 – ident: B79 doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020131 – ident: B31 doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7 – ident: B39 doi: 10.1145/1056808.1056966 – ident: B65 doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2010.11.005 – ident: B21 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1301 – ident: B7 doi: 10.2307/258391 – volume: 73 start-page: 59 issue: 2 year: 1995 ident: B41 publication-title: Harvard Bus. Rev. – ident: B61 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.44.12.1595 – ident: B53 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636 – ident: B56 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1385.12084 – ident: B57 doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(05)31031-2 – start-page: A01 issue: 3 year: 2005 ident: B13 publication-title: Washington Post – volume: 82 start-page: 78 issue: 5 year: 2004 ident: B63 publication-title: Harvard Bus. Rev. – ident: B67 doi: 10.1016/S1474-8231(02)03007-0 – ident: B42 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853 – ident: B74 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 – ident: B24 doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002 – ident: B32 doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000304495.95522.ca – volume-title: The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer year: 2004 ident: B43 – issue: 17 year: 2012 ident: B15 publication-title: PR Newswire.com – ident: B69 doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.1.102.12566 |
| SSID | ssj0007876 |
| Score | 2.3983896 |
| Snippet | Operational failures persist, in part because employees work around them without engaging in actions to prevent recurrence. To break this cycle, we investigate... |
| SourceID | proquest gale crossref jstor informs |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 1124 |
| SubjectTerms | Access Drug administration Drugs Experiments Failure analysis healthcare: hospitals Hospitals Laboratories Management Nurses Operations management organizational studies: behavior Owners Pharmacy Policy making Real time Recurrence reliability: quality control Work environment |
| Title | The Impact of Workaround Difficulty on Frontline Employees’ Response to Operational Failures: A Laboratory Experiment on Medication Administration |
| URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/43835041 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2678108619 |
| Volume | 62 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 eissn: 1526-5501 dateEnd: 20201101 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0007876 issn: 0025-1909 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 19870101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9RAEF-OK4ovxa_i2ar7oN6DpOZjN9n4dkpLEawiLfQt7CabImhSLjlQ_wz_Ymc2m2xCT6y-hCMMm2zmdzOzu7-ZIeR5USZ4Opd4udSFxwRTngx87SUC42eRpNLsQ344jU_O2fsLfjGbfR-xljatOsx_bs0r-R-twj3QK2bJ_oNmh0HhBvwG_cIVNAzXG-vYpTkixUqusU2SaXtiimr8wMOAEosUmHBS2_6-hjqx7uixpndGfaXX_bZgKb8gV73p8qAtSvAo3nUDwFHNqXwHHzmpwDuOdx275pX1tdcJHSuwKtJmP9j9hyAe0VbMmnTgNCAt8mP_ts3AHByYoKMnWrs13o7EtroQnKRjyxyHIwSykZmFIJFttf8h7qAcf6sarE4Z8ENYcPnO0w38wxWDOCkVEdaL3QnBH_hzsvP26PTT58GLgyGL-3a_-F624Cc84PV0-ElAY936ra7qbdOTXK85ehO9nN0lu3bZQVcdhu6Rma7uk9t91sMD8gugRDso0bqkDkrUQYnWFR2gRAcoLWkPJNrWdAQk2gPpDZXUwYg6GOGIDkZ0CqOH5Pz46OzdiWfbdXg5j1nrcV8yEZUY4Rexn4RKCZbGUmvBS1jpx4VkXDEVpCVLc8XzUEH0mPploMBeiIJHe2Re1ZV-RCgs0iOZwnBFJBjjiYykzjkDowK2Q3CxIF7_zbPc1rLHlipfM1zTgo4y1FGGOspQRwuyHOSvuiouf5R8gSrMbAtYuDS4SdZcyk3TZA43C_LMyGEJlQo5Wp3ARGJpJcoa3i2XNt8FZogl1yaSLyeSl13B-W2CBxNB8AT5dByLu79Ocs_AchDDesXcZwE8oMdpZu1ck4UQz2I_tiB9fOMp7ZM7zlYckHm73ugnEL236qn9o_0GeKb4kw |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+impact+of+workaround+difficulty+on+frontline+employees%27+response+to+operational+failures%3A+a+laboratory+experiment+on+medication+administration&rft.jtitle=Management+science&rft.au=Tucker%2C+Anita+L&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.pub=Institute+for+Operations+Research+and+the+Management+Sciences&rft.issn=0025-1909&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1124&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287%2Fmnsc.2015.2170&rft.externalDocID=A450998319 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0025-1909&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0025-1909&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0025-1909&client=summon |