The augmented reality-aided navigation system may improve rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in total knee arthroplasty

Background Tibial rotational alignment is the most prone to error among the placement angles of the prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The augmented reality (AR)-aided navigation system enables surgeons to visualize the tibial anteroposterior axis established on the pre-resection surface s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 704 - 9
Main Authors Tsukada, Sachiyuki, Ogawa, Hiroyuki, Saito, Masayoshi, Minagawa, Shizuka, Kurita, Miki, Hirasawa, Naoyuki
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 25.07.2025
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1471-2474
1471-2474
DOI10.1186/s12891-025-08955-8

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background Tibial rotational alignment is the most prone to error among the placement angles of the prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The augmented reality (AR)-aided navigation system enables surgeons to visualize the tibial anteroposterior axis established on the pre-resection surface superimposed on the bone surface after proximal tibial resection. Methods We compared the axial, coronal, and sagittal alignments of the tibial baseplate between 58 TKAs performed using an AR-aided navigation system and 64 TKAs in which the rotational alignment was determined manually. To assess alignment, the three-dimensional coordinates of the lower limb from preoperative CT data were overlaid onto postoperative CT data using a surface-matching algorithm. Results The absolute difference between the anteroposterior axis and the rotational angle of the tibial baseplate was significantly smaller in the AR-aided group compared to the control group (3.7 ± 3.4° vs. 5.1 ± 4.4°, p  = 0.047). In both coronal and sagittal alignments, the absolute differences between the target angle and the measured angle were not significantly different between the two groups (1.1 ± 0.9° vs. 1.2 ± 1.0°, p  = 0.75 in coronal alignment, and 1.9 ± 1.3° vs. 1.7 ± 1.4°, p  = 0.43 in sagittal alignment, respectively). Conclusions The AR-aided navigation system slightly but significantly improved the accuracy of tibial rotational alignment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1471-2474
1471-2474
DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08955-8