Paths to a sustainable food sector: integrated design and LCA of future food supply chains: the case of pork production in Sweden
PURPOSE: To describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply chain inevitably means that various attributes of the product and its system will change. This project assumed this challenge and delivered detailed descriptions, life cycle assessment (LCA) eva...
Saved in:
| Published in | The international journal of life cycle assessment Vol. 21; no. 5; pp. 664 - 676 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.05.2016
Springer Nature B.V |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0948-3349 1614-7502 1614-7502 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-015-0969-5 |
Cover
| Abstract | PURPOSE: To describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply chain inevitably means that various attributes of the product and its system will change. This project assumed this challenge and delivered detailed descriptions, life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluations, and consequence assessments of the supply chains of six commodities, i.e., milk, cheese, beef, pork, chicken, and bread, from a Swedish region. This paper presents results for the pork supply chain. METHODS: In the project setup, experts on production along supply chains designed three scenarios for environmentally improved systems. These scenarios, i.e., the ecosystem, plant nutrients, and climate scenarios, were intended to address different clusters of environmental goals. The next step was to challenge these scenarios by considering their possible consequences for products and systems from the food safety, sensory quality, animal welfare, consumer appreciation, and (for primary production only) cost perspectives. This led to changes in production system design to prevent negative consequences. The final supply chains were quantified using LCA and were again assessed from the three perspectives. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The scenario design approach worked well, thoroughly and credibly describing the production systems. Assessment of consequences bolstered the credibility and quality of the systems and results. The LCA of pig production and smoked ham identified large potentials for improvement by implementing available knowledge: global warming potential (GWP) could be reduced 21â54Â % and marine eutrophication by 14â45Â %. The main reason for these improvements was improved productivity (approaching the best producersâ current performance), though dedicated measures were also important, resulting in increased nitrogen efficiency, more varied crop rotations for crop production and better production management, and improved animal health and manure management for animal production. Reduced post-farm wastage contributed as did reduced emissions from fertilizer production. CONCLUSIONS: The working approach applied was successful in integrating LCA research with food system production expertise to deliver results relevant to supply chain decision-makers. The consequence assessments brought considerable value to the project, giving its results greater credibility. By introducing constraints in the form of âno negative consequences and no increased costs,â the work was âguidedâ so that the scenario design avoided being hampered by too many opportunities. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | PurposeTo describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply chain inevitably means that various attributes of the product and its system will change. This project assumed this challenge and delivered detailed descriptions, life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluations, and consequence assessments of the supply chains of six commodities, i.e., milk, cheese, beef, pork, chicken, and bread, from a Swedish region. This paper presents results for the pork supply chain. MethodsIn the project setup, experts on production along supply chains designed three scenarios for environmentally improved systems. These scenarios, i.e., the ecosystem, plant nutrients, and climate scenarios, were intended to address different clusters of environmental goals. The next step was to challenge these scenarios by considering their possible consequences for products and systems from the food safety, sensory quality, animal welfare, consumer appreciation, and (for primary production only) cost perspectives. This led to changes in production system design to prevent negative consequences. The final supply chains were quantified using LCA and were again assessed from the three perspectives. Results and discussionThe scenario design approach worked well, thoroughly and credibly describing the production systems. Assessment of consequences bolstered the credibility and quality of the systems and results. The LCA of pig production and smoked ham identified large potentials for improvement by implementing available knowledge: global warming potential (GWP) could be reduced 21-54% and marine eutrophication by 14-45%. The main reason for these improvements was improved productivity (approaching the best producers' current performance), though dedicated measures were also important, resulting in increased nitrogen efficiency, more varied crop rotations for crop production and better production management, and improved animal health and manure management for animal production. Reduced post-farm wastage contributed as did reduced emissions from fertilizer production. ConclusionsThe working approach applied was successful in integrating LCA research with food system production expertise to deliver results relevant to supply chain decision-makers. The consequence assessments brought considerable value to the project, giving its results greater credibility. By introducing constraints in the form of "no negative consequences and no increased costs," the work was "guided" so that the scenario design avoided being hampered by too many opportunities. Purpose To describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply chain inevitably means that various attributes of the product and its system will change. This project assumed this challenge and delivered detailed descriptions, life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluations, and consequence assessments of the supply chains of six commodities, i.e., milk, cheese, beef, pork, chicken, and bread, from a Swedish region. This paper presents results for the pork supply chain. Methods In the project setup, experts on production along supply chains designed three scenarios for environmentally improved systems. These scenarios, i.e., the ecosystem , plant nutrients , and climate scenarios, were intended to address different clusters of environmental goals. The next step was to challenge these scenarios by considering their possible consequences for products and systems from the food safety, sensory quality, animal welfare, consumer appreciation, and (for primary production only) cost perspectives. This led to changes in production system design to prevent negative consequences. The final supply chains were quantified using LCA and were again assessed from the three perspectives. Results and discussion The scenario design approach worked well, thoroughly and credibly describing the production systems. Assessment of consequences bolstered the credibility and quality of the systems and results. The LCA of pig production and smoked ham identified large potentials for improvement by implementing available knowledge: global warming potential (GWP) could be reduced 21–54 % and marine eutrophication by 14–45 %. The main reason for these improvements was improved productivity (approaching the best producers’ current performance), though dedicated measures were also important, resulting in increased nitrogen efficiency, more varied crop rotations for crop production and better production management, and improved animal health and manure management for animal production. Reduced post-farm wastage contributed as did reduced emissions from fertilizer production. Conclusions The working approach applied was successful in integrating LCA research with food system production expertise to deliver results relevant to supply chain decision-makers. The consequence assessments brought considerable value to the project, giving its results greater credibility. By introducing constraints in the form of “no negative consequences and no increased costs,” the work was “guided” so that the scenario design avoided being hampered by too many opportunities. To describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply chain inevitably means that various attributes of the product and its system will change. This project assumed this challenge and delivered detailed descriptions, life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluations, and consequence assessments of the supply chains of six commodities, i.e., milk, cheese, beef, pork, chicken, and bread, from a Swedish region. This paper presents results for the pork supply chain. In the project setup, experts on production along supply chains designed three scenarios for environmentally improved systems. These scenarios, i.e., the ecosystem, plant nutrients, and climate scenarios, were intended to address different clusters of environmental goals. The next step was to challenge these scenarios by considering their possible consequences for products and systems from the food safety, sensory quality, animal welfare, consumer appreciation, and (for primary production only) cost perspectives. This led to changes in production system design to prevent negative consequences. The final supply chains were quantified using LCA and were again assessed from the three perspectives. The scenario design approach worked well, thoroughly and credibly describing the production systems. Assessment of consequences bolstered the credibility and quality of the systems and results. The LCA of pig production and smoked ham identified large potentials for improvement by implementing available knowledge: global warming potential (GWP) could be reduced 21-54 % and marine eutrophication by 14-45 %. The main reason for these improvements was improved productivity (approaching the best producers' current performance), though dedicated measures were also important, resulting in increased nitrogen efficiency, more varied crop rotations for crop production and better production management, and improved animal health and manure management for animal production. Reduced post-farm wastage contributed as did reduced emissions from fertilizer production. The working approach applied was successful in integrating LCA research with food system production expertise to deliver results relevant to supply chain decision-makers. The consequence assessments brought considerable value to the project, giving its results greater credibility. By introducing constraints in the form of "no negative consequences and no increased costs," the work was "guided" so that the scenario design avoided being hampered by too many opportunities. Purpose: To describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply chain inevitably means that various attributes of the product and its system will change. This project assumed this challenge and delivered detailed descriptions, life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluations, and consequence assessments of the supply chains of six commodities, i.e., milk, cheese, beef, pork, chicken, and bread, from a Swedish region. This paper presents results for the pork supply chain. Methods: In the project setup, experts on production along supply chains designed three scenarios for environmentally improved systems. These scenarios, i.e., the ecosystem, plant nutrients, and climate scenarios, were intended to address different clusters of environmental goals. The next step was to challenge these scenarios by considering their possible consequences for products and systems from the food safety, sensory quality, animal welfare, consumer appreciation, and (for primary production only) cost perspectives. This led to changes in production system design to prevent negative consequences. The final supply chains were quantified using LCA and were again assessed from the three perspectives. Results and discussion: The scenario design approach worked well, thoroughly and credibly describing the production systems. Assessment of consequences bolstered the credibility and quality of the systems and results. The LCA of pig production and smoked ham identified large potentials for improvement by implementing available knowledge: global warming potential (GWP) could be reduced 21–54 % and marine eutrophication by 14–45 %. The main reason for these improvements was improved productivity (approaching the best producers’ current performance), though dedicated measures were also important, resulting in increased nitrogen efficiency, more varied crop rotations for crop production and better production management, and improved animal health and manure management for animal production. Reduced post-farm wastage contributed as did reduced emissions from fertilizer production. Conclusions: The working approach applied was successful in integrating LCA research with food system production expertise to deliver results relevant to supply chain decision-makers. The consequence assessments brought considerable value to the project, giving its results greater credibility. By introducing constraints in the form of “no negative consequences and no increased costs,” the work was “guided” so that the scenario design avoided being hampered by too many opportunities. PURPOSE: To describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply chain inevitably means that various attributes of the product and its system will change. This project assumed this challenge and delivered detailed descriptions, life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluations, and consequence assessments of the supply chains of six commodities, i.e., milk, cheese, beef, pork, chicken, and bread, from a Swedish region. This paper presents results for the pork supply chain. METHODS: In the project setup, experts on production along supply chains designed three scenarios for environmentally improved systems. These scenarios, i.e., the ecosystem, plant nutrients, and climate scenarios, were intended to address different clusters of environmental goals. The next step was to challenge these scenarios by considering their possible consequences for products and systems from the food safety, sensory quality, animal welfare, consumer appreciation, and (for primary production only) cost perspectives. This led to changes in production system design to prevent negative consequences. The final supply chains were quantified using LCA and were again assessed from the three perspectives. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The scenario design approach worked well, thoroughly and credibly describing the production systems. Assessment of consequences bolstered the credibility and quality of the systems and results. The LCA of pig production and smoked ham identified large potentials for improvement by implementing available knowledge: global warming potential (GWP) could be reduced 21–54 % and marine eutrophication by 14–45 %. The main reason for these improvements was improved productivity (approaching the best producers’ current performance), though dedicated measures were also important, resulting in increased nitrogen efficiency, more varied crop rotations for crop production and better production management, and improved animal health and manure management for animal production. Reduced post-farm wastage contributed as did reduced emissions from fertilizer production. CONCLUSIONS: The working approach applied was successful in integrating LCA research with food system production expertise to deliver results relevant to supply chain decision-makers. The consequence assessments brought considerable value to the project, giving its results greater credibility. By introducing constraints in the form of “no negative consequences and no increased costs,” the work was “guided” so that the scenario design avoided being hampered by too many opportunities. PURPOSE: To describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply chain inevitably means that various attributes of the product and its system will change. This project assumed this challenge and delivered detailed descriptions, life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluations, and consequence assessments of the supply chains of six commodities, i.e., milk, cheese, beef, pork, chicken, and bread, from a Swedish region. This paper presents results for the pork supply chain. METHODS: In the project setup, experts on production along supply chains designed three scenarios for environmentally improved systems. These scenarios, i.e., the ecosystem, plant nutrients, and climate scenarios, were intended to address different clusters of environmental goals. The next step was to challenge these scenarios by considering their possible consequences for products and systems from the food safety, sensory quality, animal welfare, consumer appreciation, and (for primary production only) cost perspectives. This led to changes in production system design to prevent negative consequences. The final supply chains were quantified using LCA and were again assessed from the three perspectives. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The scenario design approach worked well, thoroughly and credibly describing the production systems. Assessment of consequences bolstered the credibility and quality of the systems and results. The LCA of pig production and smoked ham identified large potentials for improvement by implementing available knowledge: global warming potential (GWP) could be reduced 21â54Â % and marine eutrophication by 14â45Â %. The main reason for these improvements was improved productivity (approaching the best producersâ current performance), though dedicated measures were also important, resulting in increased nitrogen efficiency, more varied crop rotations for crop production and better production management, and improved animal health and manure management for animal production. Reduced post-farm wastage contributed as did reduced emissions from fertilizer production. CONCLUSIONS: The working approach applied was successful in integrating LCA research with food system production expertise to deliver results relevant to supply chain decision-makers. The consequence assessments brought considerable value to the project, giving its results greater credibility. By introducing constraints in the form of âno negative consequences and no increased costs,â the work was âguidedâ so that the scenario design avoided being hampered by too many opportunities. Issue Title: LCA of Nutrition and Food Consumption Purpose To describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply chain inevitably means that various attributes of the product and its system will change. This project assumed this challenge and delivered detailed descriptions, life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluations, and consequence assessments of the supply chains of six commodities, i.e., milk, cheese, beef, pork, chicken, and bread, from a Swedish region. This paper presents results for the pork supply chain. Methods In the project setup, experts on production along supply chains designed three scenarios for environmentally improved systems. These scenarios, i.e., the ecosystem, plant nutrients, and climate scenarios, were intended to address different clusters of environmental goals. The next step was to challenge these scenarios by considering their possible consequences for products and systems from the food safety, sensory quality, animal welfare, consumer appreciation, and (for primary production only) cost perspectives. This led to changes in production system design to prevent negative consequences. The final supply chains were quantified using LCA and were again assessed from the three perspectives. Results and discussion The scenario design approach worked well, thoroughly and credibly describing the production systems. Assessment of consequences bolstered the credibility and quality of the systems and results. The LCA of pig production and smoked ham identified large potentials for improvement by implementing available knowledge: global warming potential (GWP) could be reduced 21-54 % and marine eutrophication by 14-45 %. The main reason for these improvements was improved productivity (approaching the best producers' current performance), though dedicated measures were also important, resulting in increased nitrogen efficiency, more varied crop rotations for crop production and better production management, and improved animal health and manure management for animal production. Reduced post-farm wastage contributed as did reduced emissions from fertilizer production. Conclusions The working approach applied was successful in integrating LCA research with food system production expertise to deliver results relevant to supply chain decision-makers. The consequence assessments brought considerable value to the project, giving its results greater credibility. By introducing constraints in the form of "no negative consequences and no increased costs," the work was "guided" so that the scenario design avoided being hampered by too many opportunities. |
| Author | Ã
se Lundh Helena Wall Annica Andersson Maria Stenberg Eva Salomon Margareta Emanuelsson Leif Göransson Ulla-Karin Barr Stefan Gunnarsson Katarina Lorentzon Carl Brunius Sonesson, Ulf Gunnar Lars Hamberg Bo Stenberg Karin Ãstergren Anna Hessle Tim Nielsen Karl-Ivar Kumm Elisabeth Borch Jan Bertilsson Martin Sundberg Erik Sindhöj |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Sonesson, Ulf Gunnar – sequence: 2 fullname: Katarina Lorentzon – sequence: 3 fullname: Annica Andersson – sequence: 4 fullname: Ulla-Karin Barr – sequence: 5 fullname: Jan Bertilsson – sequence: 6 fullname: Elisabeth Borch – sequence: 7 fullname: Carl Brunius – sequence: 8 fullname: Margareta Emanuelsson – sequence: 9 fullname: Leif Göransson – sequence: 10 fullname: Stefan Gunnarsson – sequence: 11 fullname: Lars Hamberg – sequence: 12 fullname: Anna Hessle – sequence: 13 fullname: Karl-Ivar Kumm – sequence: 14 fullname: à se Lundh – sequence: 15 fullname: Tim Nielsen – sequence: 16 fullname: Karin Ãstergren – sequence: 17 fullname: Eva Salomon – sequence: 18 fullname: Erik Sindhöj – sequence: 19 fullname: Bo Stenberg – sequence: 20 fullname: Maria Stenberg – sequence: 21 fullname: Martin Sundberg – sequence: 22 fullname: Helena Wall |
| BackLink | https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-330$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index https://res.slu.se/id/publ/69717$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index |
| BookMark | eNqNks1rFDEchgep4Lb6B3gy4EUPo_klk6_eyvoJCwq1XkM2yeymTpMxyVB69D93hm1BCpaecnnel-TNc9wcxRR907wE_A4wFu8LAOWixcBarLhq2ZNmBRy6VjBMjpoVVp1sKe3Us-a4lEuMCWDFVs2f76buC6oJGVSmUk2IZjt41KfkUPG2pnyKQqx-l031Djlfwi4iEx3arM9Q6lE_1SnfBaZxHG6Q3c815RTVvUfWFL9gY8q_0JiTm2wNKc6d6PzaOx-fN097MxT_4vY8aS4-ffyx_tJuvn3-uj7btJYxVVtqwVreAxeU221vCZjOWcH7njhPROeYBJDOOb4ljHeMO2JFB44CBa48oydNe-gt136ctnrM4crkG51M0GWYtiYvhy5ecyVAzPzb__Ifws8znfJO56ApxTP75sDOD_w9-VL1VSjWD4OJPk1FgwQhiZCSPALFEivF5SNahWSk6zomZ_T1PfQyTTnOey4UBiBKLpQ4UDanUrLvtQ3VLN9RswmDBqwXmfRBJj3LpBeZ9DIe3EvezfFQhtwOOLNx5_M_d3og9OoQ6k3SZpdD0RfnBAOfjcWLsvQv9A7nUA |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_020_12281_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2021_03_028 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11102984 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13116260 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_018_1553_6 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408398_2024_2400590 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2016_12_153 crossref_primary_10_3390_su8010095 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cie_2017_04_031 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2018_04_011 crossref_primary_10_11144_Javeriana_cao29_53_oacs crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_020_01811_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2021_07_028 crossref_primary_10_3233_WEB_200440 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envsci_2020_04_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_06_071 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_137672 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_119566 crossref_primary_10_3390_su9091615 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_151900 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/0040-1625(91)90039-I 10.1016/j.tifs.2007.02.008 10.1038/461472a 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.11.027 10.1016/0024-6301(87)90038-0 10.1065/lca2004.06.160 10.1016/0377-2217(93)90186-Q 10.1051/agro/2010006 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.009 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.095 10.1016/0024-6301(88)90106-9 10.1016/j.agee.2004.05.007 10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.402 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 – notice: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 |
| CorporateAuthor | Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet |
| CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet |
| DBID | FBQ AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7ST 7TB 7XB 88I 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI C1K CCPQU DWQXO F28 FR3 GNUQQ HCIFZ KR7 L6V M2P M7S PATMY PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PTHSS PYCSY Q9U SOI 7S9 L.6 ADTPV AOWAS |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-015-0969-5 |
| DatabaseName | AGRIS CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Environment Abstracts Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Science Database (Alumni Edition) Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Technology Collection (via ProQuest SciTech Premium Collection) Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One ProQuest Central ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering Engineering Research Database ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection Civil Engineering Abstracts ProQuest Engineering Collection Science Database (via ProQuest SciTech Premium Collection) Engineering Database Environmental Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Collection Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic Environment Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic SwePub SwePub Articles |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Engineering Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) Engineering Collection ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering Civil Engineering Abstracts Engineering Database ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection Environmental Science Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Materials Science & Engineering Collection Environmental Science Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Environment Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic (New) AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Civil Engineering Abstracts Environment Abstracts AGRICOLA ProQuest Central Student |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database – sequence: 2 dbid: FBQ name: AGRIS url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN sourceTypes: Publisher |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Business |
| EISSN | 1614-7502 |
| EndPage | 676 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_slubar_slu_se_69717 oai_DiVA_org_ri_330 4018418841 10_1007_s11367_015_0969_5 US201600201095 |
| Genre | Feature |
| GeographicLocations | Sweden ANE, Sweden |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Sweden – name: ANE, Sweden |
| GroupedDBID | --- -5A -5G -5~ -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 199 1N0 2.D 203 29J 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 4P2 5VS 67M 67Z 6NX 78A 7XC 88I 8FE 8FG 8FH 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AABYN AAFGU AAHNG AAIAL AAIKC AAJKR AAMNW AAMRO AANZL AARHV AARTL AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYFA AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAZAB ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABEOS ABFGW ABFTD ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABJCF ABJNI ABJOX ABKAS ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABQBU ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACBMV ACBRV ACBXY ACBYP ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACHSB ACHXU ACIGE ACIHN ACIPQ ACIWK ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACREN ACSNA ACTTH ACVWB ACWMK ADHHG ADHIR ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADMDM ADOXG ADQRH ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEAQA AEBTG AEEQQ AEFTE AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AESTI AETLH AEVLU AEVTX AEXYK AFGCZ AFKRA AFLOW AFNRJ AFQWF AFRAH AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGBP AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQMX AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIIXL AILAN AIMYW AITGF AJBLW AJDOV AJRNO AJZVZ AKQUC ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG ATCPS AVWKF AXYYD AYJHY AZFZN AZQEC B-. BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGLVJ BGNMA BHPHI BPHCQ CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 DWQXO EBD EBLON EBS EDH EIOEI EJD ESBYG FBQ FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNUQQ GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GXS HCIFZ HF~ HG5 HG6 HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ IJ- IKXTQ ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Y I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV L6V LAS LLZTM M2P M4Y M7S MA- ML. N2Q N9A NB0 NDZJH NF0 NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM P19 P2P PATMY PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PT4 PT5 PTHSS PYCSY Q2X QOK QOS R89 R9I RHV RMD RNI RNS ROL RPX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S3B SAP SCK SCLPG SDH SEV SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW STPWE SZN T13 T16 TSG TSK TSV TUC U2A UCJ UG4 UNUBA UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WK6 WK8 Y6R YLTOR Z45 Z5O Z7R Z7S Z7U Z7V Z7W Z7X Z7Y Z7Z Z81 Z83 Z85 Z86 Z88 Z8M Z8N Z8P Z8Q Z8R Z8S Z8T Z8W Z92 ZMTXR AACDK AAHBH AAJBT AASML AAYZH ABAKF ABQSL ACAOD ACDTI ACPIV ACZOJ AEFQL AEMSY AEUYN AFBBN AGQEE AGRTI AIGIU BSONS H13 AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACSTC ADHKG AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT 7ST 7TB 7XB 8FD 8FK ABRTQ C1K F28 FR3 KR7 PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQUKI Q9U SOI PUEGO 7S9 L.6 ADTPV AOWAS |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-3c1cc6f16736cbfc21a4dc76ff2de274d58118ddd6b256456d2c741d313169e53 |
| IEDL.DBID | 8FG |
| ISSN | 0948-3349 1614-7502 |
| IngestDate | Tue Sep 09 23:30:37 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 24 03:33:14 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 03:15:13 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 22:16:10 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 00:06:24 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 19:26:07 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:52:07 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:05:56 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:42:29 EST 2025 Wed Dec 27 19:17:58 EST 2023 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 5 |
| Keywords | Environment Sustainable food chains LCA Future food production Food system scenarios Consequence assessment |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c559t-3c1cc6f16736cbfc21a4dc76ff2de274d58118ddd6b256456d2c741d313169e53 |
| Notes | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0969-5 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0167-5603 |
| PQID | 1780112988 |
| PQPubID | 54409 |
| PageCount | 13 |
| ParticipantIDs | swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_69717 swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_ri_330 proquest_miscellaneous_1817827882 proquest_miscellaneous_1808099680 proquest_miscellaneous_1785244458 proquest_journals_1780112988 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s11367_015_0969_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_015_0969_5 springer_journals_10_1007_s11367_015_0969_5 fao_agris_US201600201095 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2016-05-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-05-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2016 text: 2016-05-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Berlin/Heidelberg |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Berlin/Heidelberg – name: Dordrecht |
| PublicationTitle | The international journal of life cycle assessment |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | Int J Life Cycle Assess |
| PublicationYear | 2016 |
| Publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg Springer Nature B.V |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg – name: Springer Nature B.V |
| References | BunnDWSaloAAForecasting with scenariosEur J Oper Res199368329130310.1016/0377-2217(93)90186-Q Bellon-MaurelVPetersGMClermidySFrizarinGSinfortCOjedaHRouxPShortMDStreamlining life cycle inventory data generation in agriculture using traceability data and information and communication technologies—part II: application to viticultureJ Clean Prod20158711912910.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.095 SchnaarsSPHow to develop and use scenariosLong Range Plann198720110511410.1016/0024-6301(87)90038-0 Strid ErikssonIElmquistHSternSNybrantTEnvironmental systems analysis of pig production: the impact of feed choiceInt J Life Cycle Assess200510214315410.1065/lca2004.06.160 MeyerRComparison of scenarios on futures of European food chainsTrends Foods Sci Technol2007181105405451:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFeltrrN10.1016/j.tifs.2007.02.008 MilletSMHow scenarios trigger strategic thinkingLong Range Plan1988215616810.1016/0024-6301(88)90106-9 RoweGWrightGBolgerFDelphi—a reevaluation of research and theoryTechnol Forecast Soc199139323525110.1016/0040-1625(91)90039-I European Commission (2002) Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-ontent/EN/TXT/?qid=1398161699655&uri=CELEX:32002R1774. Accessed Nov 2014 SEPA (2013) Sweden’s environmental quality objectives. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm. http://www.miljomal.se/sv/Environmental-Objectives-Portal/Undre-meny/About-the-Environmental-Objectives. Accessed Feb 2012 PRé ConsultantsSimaPro 72007AmersfoortPRé Consultants B.V Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N (eds) (2003) Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods. Final report ecoinvent 2000. Swiss Centre for LCI, Duebendorf, Switzerland GöranssonLBarrUKBorchEBruniusCFlorénBGunnarssonSHambergLLindbomILorentzonKNielsenTNormannASalomonESindhöjESonessonUSundbergMÅströmAÖstergrenKHållbara matvägar – referens- och lösningsscenarier för grisproduktion och framställning av rökt skinka [Paths to a sustainable food sector: solution scenarios for pig production and production of smoked, sliced ham]. SIK-Report 8872014GöteborgSIK – The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology LindbomIEsbjörnssonCForsmanJGustavssonJSundströmBÅtgärder för minskat svinn i livsmedelsindustrin – ett industri och kedjeperspektiv [Measures for reduced losses in the food industry: an industry and supply chain perspective]. Report no. 65952013StockholmSwedish Environmental Protection Agency Basset-MensCvan der WerfHMGScenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in FranceAgric Ecosyst Environ20051051–212714410.1016/j.agee.2004.05.007 AudsleyEBranderMChattertonJMurphy-BokernDWebsterCWilliamsAHow low can we go? An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the UK food system and the scope to reduce them by 2050. Report2009SurreyWWF-UK Basset-MensCvan der WerfHMGRobinPMorvanTHassounaMPaillatJMVertesFMethods and data for the environmental inventory of contrasting pig production systemsJ Clean Prod200715151395140510.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.009 StenbergBSonessonUStenbergMHållbara matvägar – utgångs- och lösningsscenarier för växtodling [Paths to a sustainable food sector: solution scenarios for crop production]. SIK-Report 8902014GöteborgSIK – The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology Garcia-LaunayFvan der WerfHMGNguyenTTHLe TutourLDourmadJYEvaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in pig production using life cycle assessmentLivest Sci201416115817510.1016/j.livsci.2013.11.027 European Commission (2011) Joint Research Centre–Institute for Environment and Sustainability: International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook: recommendations for life cycle impact assessment in the European context, 1st ed. EUR 24571 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxemburg HalbergNHermansenJESillebak KristensenIEriksenJTvedegaardNMolt PetersenBImpact of organic pig production systems on CO2 emission, C sequestration and nitrate pollutionAgron Sustain Dev20103047217311:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhs1aktLjF10.1051/agro/2010006 SonessonULorentzonKFlorénBKrewerCNilssonKKummKIWoodhouseAHållbara matvägar – resultat och analys [Paths to a sustainable food sector: results and analysis]. SIK-Report 8912014GöteborgSIK – The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology SternSSonessonUGunnarssonSÖbornIKummK-INybrantTSustainable development of food production: a case study on scenarios for pig productionAmbio2005344–540240710.1579/0044-7447-34.4.402 RockströmJSteffenWNooneKPerssonÅChapinFSIIILambinELentonTMSchefferMFolkeCSchellnhuberHNykvistBDe WitCAHughesTvan der LeeuwSRodheHSörlinSSnyderPKCostanzaRSvedinUFalkenmarkMKarlbergLCorellRWFabryVJHansenJWalkerBHLivermanDRichardsonKCrutzenCFoleyJA safe operating space for humanityNature200946147247510.1038/461472a Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, de Schrywer A, Struijs J, van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008—a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and endpoint level; Report 1: characterisation. http://www.lcia-recipe.net L Göransson (969_CR11) 2014 E Audsley (969_CR1) 2009 969_CR20 969_CR10 DW Bunn (969_CR5) 1993; 68 I Lindbom (969_CR13) 2013 C Basset-Mens (969_CR2) 2005; 105 R Meyer (969_CR14) 2007; 18 SP Schnaars (969_CR19) 1987; 20 SM Millet (969_CR15) 1988; 21 S Stern (969_CR23) 2005; 34 PRé Consultants (969_CR16) 2007 V Bellon-Maurel (969_CR4) 2015; 87 C Basset-Mens (969_CR3) 2007; 15 J Rockström (969_CR17) 2009; 461 B Stenberg (969_CR22) 2014 F Garcia-Launay (969_CR9) 2014; 161 G Rowe (969_CR18) 1991; 39 U Sonesson (969_CR21) 2014 I Strid Eriksson (969_CR24) 2005; 10 969_CR6 969_CR7 969_CR8 N Halberg (969_CR12) 2010; 30 |
| References_xml | – reference: LindbomIEsbjörnssonCForsmanJGustavssonJSundströmBÅtgärder för minskat svinn i livsmedelsindustrin – ett industri och kedjeperspektiv [Measures for reduced losses in the food industry: an industry and supply chain perspective]. Report no. 65952013StockholmSwedish Environmental Protection Agency – reference: SEPA (2013) Sweden’s environmental quality objectives. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm. http://www.miljomal.se/sv/Environmental-Objectives-Portal/Undre-meny/About-the-Environmental-Objectives. Accessed Feb 2012 – reference: SternSSonessonUGunnarssonSÖbornIKummK-INybrantTSustainable development of food production: a case study on scenarios for pig productionAmbio2005344–540240710.1579/0044-7447-34.4.402 – reference: European Commission (2002) Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-ontent/EN/TXT/?qid=1398161699655&uri=CELEX:32002R1774. Accessed Nov 2014 – reference: HalbergNHermansenJESillebak KristensenIEriksenJTvedegaardNMolt PetersenBImpact of organic pig production systems on CO2 emission, C sequestration and nitrate pollutionAgron Sustain Dev20103047217311:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhs1aktLjF10.1051/agro/2010006 – reference: StenbergBSonessonUStenbergMHållbara matvägar – utgångs- och lösningsscenarier för växtodling [Paths to a sustainable food sector: solution scenarios for crop production]. SIK-Report 8902014GöteborgSIK – The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology – reference: Garcia-LaunayFvan der WerfHMGNguyenTTHLe TutourLDourmadJYEvaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in pig production using life cycle assessmentLivest Sci201416115817510.1016/j.livsci.2013.11.027 – reference: SchnaarsSPHow to develop and use scenariosLong Range Plann198720110511410.1016/0024-6301(87)90038-0 – reference: MeyerRComparison of scenarios on futures of European food chainsTrends Foods Sci Technol2007181105405451:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFeltrrN10.1016/j.tifs.2007.02.008 – reference: European Commission (2011) Joint Research Centre–Institute for Environment and Sustainability: International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook: recommendations for life cycle impact assessment in the European context, 1st ed. EUR 24571 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxemburg – reference: SonessonULorentzonKFlorénBKrewerCNilssonKKummKIWoodhouseAHållbara matvägar – resultat och analys [Paths to a sustainable food sector: results and analysis]. SIK-Report 8912014GöteborgSIK – The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology – reference: Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N (eds) (2003) Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods. Final report ecoinvent 2000. Swiss Centre for LCI, Duebendorf, Switzerland – reference: PRé ConsultantsSimaPro 72007AmersfoortPRé Consultants B.V – reference: Strid ErikssonIElmquistHSternSNybrantTEnvironmental systems analysis of pig production: the impact of feed choiceInt J Life Cycle Assess200510214315410.1065/lca2004.06.160 – reference: Basset-MensCvan der WerfHMGScenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in FranceAgric Ecosyst Environ20051051–212714410.1016/j.agee.2004.05.007 – reference: MilletSMHow scenarios trigger strategic thinkingLong Range Plan1988215616810.1016/0024-6301(88)90106-9 – reference: RockströmJSteffenWNooneKPerssonÅChapinFSIIILambinELentonTMSchefferMFolkeCSchellnhuberHNykvistBDe WitCAHughesTvan der LeeuwSRodheHSörlinSSnyderPKCostanzaRSvedinUFalkenmarkMKarlbergLCorellRWFabryVJHansenJWalkerBHLivermanDRichardsonKCrutzenCFoleyJA safe operating space for humanityNature200946147247510.1038/461472a – reference: AudsleyEBranderMChattertonJMurphy-BokernDWebsterCWilliamsAHow low can we go? An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the UK food system and the scope to reduce them by 2050. Report2009SurreyWWF-UK – reference: GöranssonLBarrUKBorchEBruniusCFlorénBGunnarssonSHambergLLindbomILorentzonKNielsenTNormannASalomonESindhöjESonessonUSundbergMÅströmAÖstergrenKHållbara matvägar – referens- och lösningsscenarier för grisproduktion och framställning av rökt skinka [Paths to a sustainable food sector: solution scenarios for pig production and production of smoked, sliced ham]. SIK-Report 8872014GöteborgSIK – The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology – reference: Basset-MensCvan der WerfHMGRobinPMorvanTHassounaMPaillatJMVertesFMethods and data for the environmental inventory of contrasting pig production systemsJ Clean Prod200715151395140510.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.009 – reference: BunnDWSaloAAForecasting with scenariosEur J Oper Res199368329130310.1016/0377-2217(93)90186-Q – reference: RoweGWrightGBolgerFDelphi—a reevaluation of research and theoryTechnol Forecast Soc199139323525110.1016/0040-1625(91)90039-I – reference: Bellon-MaurelVPetersGMClermidySFrizarinGSinfortCOjedaHRouxPShortMDStreamlining life cycle inventory data generation in agriculture using traceability data and information and communication technologies—part II: application to viticultureJ Clean Prod20158711912910.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.095 – reference: Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, de Schrywer A, Struijs J, van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008—a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and endpoint level; Report 1: characterisation. http://www.lcia-recipe.net – volume: 39 start-page: 235 issue: 3 year: 1991 ident: 969_CR18 publication-title: Technol Forecast Soc doi: 10.1016/0040-1625(91)90039-I – ident: 969_CR6 – volume: 18 start-page: 540 issue: 110 year: 2007 ident: 969_CR14 publication-title: Trends Foods Sci Technol doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2007.02.008 – ident: 969_CR7 – ident: 969_CR10 – volume: 461 start-page: 472 year: 2009 ident: 969_CR17 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/461472a – volume-title: Hållbara matvägar – resultat och analys [Paths to a sustainable food sector: results and analysis]. SIK-Report 891 year: 2014 ident: 969_CR21 – volume: 161 start-page: 158 year: 2014 ident: 969_CR9 publication-title: Livest Sci doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.11.027 – volume-title: SimaPro 7 year: 2007 ident: 969_CR16 – volume: 20 start-page: 105 issue: 1 year: 1987 ident: 969_CR19 publication-title: Long Range Plann doi: 10.1016/0024-6301(87)90038-0 – volume-title: Åtgärder för minskat svinn i livsmedelsindustrin – ett industri och kedjeperspektiv [Measures for reduced losses in the food industry: an industry and supply chain perspective]. Report no. 6595 year: 2013 ident: 969_CR13 – volume: 10 start-page: 143 issue: 2 year: 2005 ident: 969_CR24 publication-title: Int J Life Cycle Assess doi: 10.1065/lca2004.06.160 – volume-title: Hållbara matvägar – utgångs- och lösningsscenarier för växtodling [Paths to a sustainable food sector: solution scenarios for crop production]. SIK-Report 890 year: 2014 ident: 969_CR22 – volume: 68 start-page: 291 issue: 3 year: 1993 ident: 969_CR5 publication-title: Eur J Oper Res doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(93)90186-Q – volume: 30 start-page: 721 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 969_CR12 publication-title: Agron Sustain Dev doi: 10.1051/agro/2010006 – volume: 15 start-page: 1395 issue: 15 year: 2007 ident: 969_CR3 publication-title: J Clean Prod doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.009 – volume: 87 start-page: 119 year: 2015 ident: 969_CR4 publication-title: J Clean Prod doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.095 – volume: 21 start-page: 61 issue: 5 year: 1988 ident: 969_CR15 publication-title: Long Range Plan doi: 10.1016/0024-6301(88)90106-9 – volume: 105 start-page: 127 issue: 1–2 year: 2005 ident: 969_CR2 publication-title: Agric Ecosyst Environ doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2004.05.007 – volume: 34 start-page: 402 issue: 4–5 year: 2005 ident: 969_CR23 publication-title: Ambio doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.402 – volume-title: How low can we go? An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the UK food system and the scope to reduce them by 2050. Report year: 2009 ident: 969_CR1 – ident: 969_CR8 – volume-title: Hållbara matvägar – referens- och lösningsscenarier för grisproduktion och framställning av rökt skinka [Paths to a sustainable food sector: solution scenarios for pig production and production of smoked, sliced ham]. SIK-Report 887 year: 2014 ident: 969_CR11 – ident: 969_CR20 |
| SSID | ssj0021095 |
| Score | 2.2447753 |
| Snippet | PURPOSE: To describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply chain inevitably means that various attributes of the... Purpose To describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply chain inevitably means that various attributes of the... Issue Title: LCA of Nutrition and Food Consumption Purpose To describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply... To describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply chain inevitably means that various attributes of the product... Purpose: To describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply chain inevitably means that various attributes of the... PurposeTo describe a more sustainable food sector, a supply chain approach is needed. Changing a supply chain inevitably means that various attributes of the... |
| SourceID | swepub proquest crossref springer fao |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 664 |
| SubjectTerms | Agricultural practices Animal and Dairy Science animal health animal manure management Animal manures Animal production Animal welfare Assessments beef breads cheeses chickens climate Climate change Consequence assessment Crop production Crop rotation Design analysis Design engineering Earth and Environmental Science ecosystems emissions Emissions control Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Economics Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Eutrophication experts fertilizers Food chains Food consumption food industry Food plants Food quality food research Food safety Food Science Food supply food supply chain Food system scenarios Foods Future food production Global warming Husdjursvetenskap LCA Lca of Nutrition and Food Consumption Life cycle analysis Life cycle assessment Life cycles Livsmedelsvetenskap Meat processing milk nitrogen nutrients Other Agricultural Sciences not elsewhere specified Pork Primary production primary productivity product system Production management production technology Sensory properties smoked ham supply chain Supply chains Sustainable agriculture Sustainable food chains Sweden Swine production systems engineering Övriga andra lantbruksrelaterade vetenskaper |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: SpringerLINK - Czech Republic Consortium dbid: AGYKE link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LT9wwELbKIlW99F2xLVRuVfXQKiiOYyfhtqJQ1JcqwVb0ZDl-AAIlaJMVorf-c2by2oLoSpz2kIkTe8ee78uMPxPyLvdSGC104HSmgxgiTqAFTDxhMcuX8Ngz3OD8_Yfcm8ZfDsVht4-76qvd-5Rks1IvNruhuhhQXxEA7M4CsUJWBfKTEVmdfP79dWfgWSxsDlsB4pIGnMdZn8y8rZFr4WjF6_Ia0hySozeERJvgs_uIHPSv3dacnG7O63zT_Lmh6HjHfj0mDzswSiet9zwh91zxlNzva-Gfkb8_AR9WtC6pptVipxX1ZWlp1Xzv36KD4ISltikHobqw9Nv2hJaetpIl3Q14gOglNcfQTLVFAXlSAzEUzYAEnNLzVnwWHAXapPsXDpbE52S6u3OwvRd0ZzYEBrhJHXDDjJGeYbmYyb2JmI6tSaT3kXXAgK1IgdJYa2UeoZCNtJEBUGM540xmTvAXZFSUhVsjlOc8jlHbJuEmFqnPZJqHxqShdGHoEjYmYf_XKdMJmuO5GmdqIcWMQ6tgaBUOrRJj8mG45bxV81hmvAb-oPQRrLZquh-hFl-IxQMZXFrvnUR1c75SLIFoD_ApTcfkzXAZZiumYHThynljIwBQQXeW2KDUJ9DQNFxmAy1FCdCjMfnYu9U_r_L_Pr1t_XjoPsqLfzr5NVHl7EjNThTn8Nj3txhVZ_Ncz_BHVU7JLGHJyzs9-xV5gGPYVouuk1E9m7sNQHR1_rqbwVcvED_h priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | Paths to a sustainable food sector: integrated design and LCA of future food supply chains: the case of pork production in Sweden |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-015-0969-5 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1780112988 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1785244458 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1808099680 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1817827882 https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-330 https://res.slu.se/id/publ/69717 |
| Volume | 21 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVLSH databaseName: SpringerLink Journals customDbUrl: mediaType: online eissn: 1614-7502 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0021095 issn: 0948-3349 databaseCode: AFBBN dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true providerName: Library Specific Holdings – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 eissn: 1614-7502 dateEnd: 20171231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0021095 issn: 0948-3349 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1614-7502 dateEnd: 20240930 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0021095 issn: 0948-3349 databaseCode: 8FG dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK - Czech Republic Consortium customDbUrl: eissn: 1614-7502 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0021095 issn: 0948-3349 databaseCode: AGYKE dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://link.springer.com providerName: Springer Nature – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM) customDbUrl: eissn: 1614-7502 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0021095 issn: 0948-3349 databaseCode: U2A dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.springerlink.com/journals/ providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELZoKyEuiKe6tFQGIQ6giDiOnaQXFMpuKx5VRVlUTpbjR6moku1mV4gj_5yZvJYi2FOkZOLEHnsenvE3hDwrvBRGCx04nekgBo0TaAELT1iM8iU89gwPOH88lkfT-N2ZOOs23OourbKXiY2gtpXBPfJXLAFZCsopTV_PrgKsGoXR1a6ExgbZYhHMJDwpPjkcHC4WNlVXwINJA87jrI9qNkfnEKsMHGkRgBGfBeKaXtrwurpmcg5R0r8QRRstNLlDbnfmI81bft8lN1x5j9zss9fvk18nYNHVdFFRTevV2Sjqq8rSutmh36cDRISltkngoLq09MNBTitPW5CR7gUs-fmTmm_QTL1PwVakBrQekoHZ_p3OWrhYYC20SU9_OBBiD8h0Mv58cBR0VRYCA97EIuCGGSM9wwQvU3gTMR1bk0jvI-vAZ7UiBSfEWiuLCKFnpI0MmCGWM85k5gR_SDbLqnTbhPKCxzGi0STcxCL1mUyL0Jg0lC4MXcJGJOzHWJkOghwrYVyqFXgyskUBWxSyRYkReTG8MmvxN9YRbwPjlD4H-aimpxGi54UY7s_g0W7PTdWt0lqt5tSIPBkew_rCoIkuXbVsaASYQNCdNTQIzgmOYxquo4GWogQcmhF52c-mP37l_3162k64ofsICP724kuuqvm5ml8ozuGzz_9BVF8uCz3Hi6qdkhl47o_WD8MOuYWD1iZ07pLNxXzpHoPRtSj2mpW1R7byw6_vx3B9Mz4--QR3p1H-GxEpKpQ |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKkYAL4qluKWAQcABFJHHsJJUQWrUsW7qtkNqtejOOH6VqlSybXVU98of4jczktRTB3nragyfO2jOeR2b8DSGvMie4Vlx5VqXKi8DieIrDweMGs3wxi1yAF5z39sVwHH055scr5Fd7FwbLKludWClqU2j8Rv4-iEGXgnFKko-THx52jcLsattCoxaLXXt5ASFb-WFnG_j7OgwHnw63hl7TVcDT4D3PPKYDrYULsKBJZ06HgYqMjoVzobEQoxmegNNtjBFZiFArwoQazK5hAQtEarFLBKj8mxFjDLH6k8HnLsAL_KrLC0RMiQejaZtFra7qITYaBO7cg6Ah9fgVO3jDqeKKi9tlZf9CMK2s3uAeudu4q7Rfy9d9smLzB-RWWy3_kPz8Ch5kSWcFVbRc3MWirigMLauMwCbtICkMNVXBCFW5oaOtPi0crUFNmgewxegl1d9hmnKTgm9KNVhZJIMw4YxOanhaECWYkx5cWFCaj8j4Wvb_MVnNi9yuEcoyFkWIfhMzHfHEpSLJfK0TX1jft3HQI367x1I3kOfYeeNcLsCakS0S2CKRLZL3yNvukUmN97GMeA0YJ9UJ6GM5PggRrc_H8oIUhjZabspGK5RyIcM98qIbhvOMSRqV22Je0XBwuWA5S2gQDBQC1cRfRgMzhTEEUD3yrpWmP_7K_9f0sha4bvkIQL59etSXxfRETk8lY_DaN_8gKs_nmZrijyytFGkcxOvLt-E5uT083BvJ0c7-7hNyBzewLibdIKuz6dw-BYdvlj2rThkl3677WP8GOoNjLQ |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LbxMxELZKKlVcEE81UMAg4ABasV6v91GpQqFp1NISRZSg3ozXj1JRZUM2UdUjf49fxcy-QhHk1lMOO-vEnvE8MjPfEPIic5HQSijPqlR5IVgcTwm4eMJgli_moWPY4PxxGO2Pww8n4mSN_Gp6YbCsstGJpaI2ucb_yN-yGHQpGCcI2FxdFjHqD95Nf3g4QQozrc04DVWPWTA7JdxY3eRxaC8vIJwrdg76wPuXQTDY-7y779UTBzwNnvXc45ppHTmGxU46czpgKjQ6jpwLjIX4zYgEHHJjTJQFCMMSmUCDSTaccRalFidIgDlYj7FftEPW3-8NR5_a8I_55QwYiKcSj_MwbXKsZSMfIqdBWC88CClST1yxkjecyq84wG3O9i9809ImDm6TW7UzS3uV9N0ha3Zyl2w0tfT3yM8R-JcFnedU0WLZqUVdnhtalPmCbdoCVhhqynISqiaGHu32aO5oBXlSv4ADSC-p_gbLFNsUPFeqwQYjGQQR3-m0Aq8FQYM16fGFBZV6n4yvhQMPSGeST-wmoTzjYYjYODHXoUhcGiWZr3XiR9b3bcy6xG_OWOoaEB3ncpzLJZQzskUCWySyRYoued2-Mq3QQFYRbwLjpDoFbS3HxwFi-flYfJDCo62Gm7LWGYVcSniXPGsfw23HFI6a2HxR0ghwyGA7K2gQKhTC2MRfRQMrBTGEV13yppGmP37K__f0vBK4dvsIT94_-9KT-exUzs4k5_C1r_5BVJwvMjXDD1lYGaUxix-uPoanZAOuuDw6GB4-Ijfx_KpK0y3Smc8W9jF4g_PsSX3NKPl63Tf7N1ajbgc |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paths+to+a+sustainable+food+sector%3A+integrated+design+and+LCA+of+future+food+supply+chains%3A+the+case+of+pork+production+in+Sweden&rft.jtitle=The+international+journal+of+life+cycle+assessment&rft.au=Sonesson%2C+Ulf&rft.au=Andersson%2C+Annica&rft.au=Bertilsson%2C+Jan&rft.au=Brunius%2C+Carl&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.issn=0948-3349&rft.volume=21&rft.spage=664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11367-015-0969-5&rft.externalDocID=oai_slubar_slu_se_69717 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0948-3349&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0948-3349&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0948-3349&client=summon |