PODSE: A computer program for optimal design of trials with discrete-time survival endpoints

► We created program for discrete-time survival endpoints. ► Good and optimal design of a trial can be found. ► Statistical power and cost of a trial design can be calculated. In experimental settings, one or more groups of subjects receive a treatment and they are compared to a group of subjects th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComputer methods and programs in biomedicine Vol. 111; no. 1; pp. 115 - 127
Main Authors Jóźwiak, Katarzyna, Moerbeek, Mirjam
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.07.2013
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0169-2607
1872-7565
1872-7565
DOI10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.02.005

Cover

More Information
Summary:► We created program for discrete-time survival endpoints. ► Good and optimal design of a trial can be found. ► Statistical power and cost of a trial design can be calculated. In experimental settings, one or more groups of subjects receive a treatment and they are compared to a group of subjects that receives a standard treatment or no treatment at all. These compared groups might have an equal number of subjects or some of the groups might have more participants relative to the other groups. Moreover, subjects in these groups can be followed over a short or a long period. To conduct experiments in a sufficient way, researchers should find a good design in the planning phase of the trial. The optimal design for experimental studies on event occurrence with discrete-time survival endpoints where two treatment groups are followed over time, is an optimal combination of the number of time periods, the total number of participants in the trial and the proportion of subjects in the experimental group. It is easy to find the best design for such studies using the PODSE program.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0169-2607
1872-7565
1872-7565
DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.02.005