Genotype-specific effects of elamipretide in patients with primary mitochondrial myopathy: a post hoc analysis of the MMPOWER-3 trial
Background As previously published, the MMPOWER-3 clinical trial did not demonstrate a significant benefit of elamipretide treatment in a genotypically diverse population of adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy (PMM). However, the prespecified subgroup of subjects with disease-causing nuclear...
Saved in:
Published in | Orphanet journal of rare diseases Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 431 - 12 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
21.11.2024
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1750-1172 1750-1172 |
DOI | 10.1186/s13023-024-03421-5 |
Cover
Summary: | Background
As previously published, the MMPOWER-3 clinical trial did not demonstrate a significant benefit of elamipretide treatment in a genotypically diverse population of adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy (PMM). However, the prespecified subgroup of subjects with disease-causing nuclear DNA (nDNA) pathogenic variants receiving elamipretide experienced an improvement in the six-minute walk test (6MWT), while the cohort of subjects with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) pathogenic variants showed no difference versus placebo. These published findings prompted additional genotype-specific post hoc analyses of the MMPOWER-3 trial. Here, we present these analyses to further investigate the findings and to seek trends and commonalities among those subjects who responded to treatment, to build a more precise Phase 3 trial design for further investigation in likely responders.
Results
Subjects with mtDNA pathogenic variants or single large-scale mtDNA deletions represented 74% of the MMPOWER-3 population, with 70% in the mtDNA cohort having either single large-scale mtDNA deletions or
MT-TL1
pathogenic variants. Most subjects in the nDNA cohort had pathogenic variants in genes required for mtDNA maintenance (mtDNA replisome), the majority of which were in
POLG
and
TWNK
. The mtDNA replisome
post-hoc
cohort displayed an improvement on the 6MWT, trending towards significant, in the elamipretide group when compared with placebo (25.2 ± 8.7 m versus 2.0 ± 8.6 m for placebo group;
p
= 0.06). The 6MWT results at week 24 in subjects with replisome variants showed a significant change in the elamipretide group subjects who had chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) (37.3 ± 9.5 m versus − 8.0 ± 10.7 m for the placebo group;
p
= 0.0024). Pharmacokinetic (exposure–response) analyses in the nDNA cohort showed a weak positive correlation between plasma elamipretide concentration and 6MWT improvement.
Conclusions
Post hoc analyses indicated that elamipretide had a beneficial effect in PMM patients with mtDNA replisome disorders, underscoring the importance of considering specific genetic subtypes in PMM clinical trials. These data serve as the foundation for a follow-up Phase 3 clinical trial (NuPOWER) which has been designed as described in this paper to determine the efficacy of elamipretide in patients with mtDNA maintenance-related disorders.
Classification of evidence
Class I
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier
NCT03323749 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 1750-1172 1750-1172 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s13023-024-03421-5 |