Current Challenges Facing the Translation of Brain Computer Interfaces from Preclinical Trials to Use in Human Patients

Current research in brain computer interface (BCI) technology is advancing beyond preclinical studies, with trials beginning in human patients. To date, these trials have been carried out with several different types of recording interfaces. The success of these devices has varied widely, but differ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in cellular neuroscience Vol. 9; p. 497
Main Authors Murphy, Maxwell D., Guggenmos, David J., Bundy, David T., Nudo, Randolph J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 06.01.2016
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1662-5102
1662-5102
DOI10.3389/fncel.2015.00497

Cover

More Information
Summary:Current research in brain computer interface (BCI) technology is advancing beyond preclinical studies, with trials beginning in human patients. To date, these trials have been carried out with several different types of recording interfaces. The success of these devices has varied widely, but different factors such as the level of invasiveness, timescale of recorded information, and ability to maintain stable functionality of the device over a long period of time all must be considered in addition to accuracy in decoding intent when assessing the most practical type of device moving forward. Here, we discuss various approaches to BCIs, distinguishing between devices focusing on control of operations extrinsic to the subject (e.g., prosthetic limbs, computer cursors) and those focusing on control of operations intrinsic to the brain (e.g., using stimulation or external feedback), including closed-loop or adaptive devices. In this discussion, we consider the current challenges facing the translation of various types of BCI technology to eventual human application.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Edited by: Surjo R. Soekadar, University Hospital of Tübingen, Germany
Reviewed by: Euan Robert Brown, Heriot-Watt University, UK; Junichi Ushiba, Keio University, Japan
ISSN:1662-5102
1662-5102
DOI:10.3389/fncel.2015.00497