Adaptive Coding

A century ago, psychologists considered cognitive control to be a major player in decision-making. Yet, the study of how perception and action are mediated by instructions and intentions entered a twilight zone during the middle part of last century as behaviorists turned their backs on mental proce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScience (American Association for the Advancement of Science) Vol. 307; no. 5712; pp. 1059 - 1060
Main Authors Ridderinkhof, K. Richard, Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington American Association for the Advancement of Science 18.02.2005
The American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0036-8075
1095-9203
DOI10.1126/science.1109837

Cover

More Information
Summary:A century ago, psychologists considered cognitive control to be a major player in decision-making. Yet, the study of how perception and action are mediated by instructions and intentions entered a twilight zone during the middle part of last century as behaviorists turned their backs on mental processes that they could not directly observe. Now, there is a resurgence of interest in understanding how the human brain regulates the flow of information to achieve intended goals that coincided with methodological innovations such as functional magnetic resonance imaging and electrical recordings from single neurons. Ridderinkhof and van den Wildenberg discuss Machens et al and Brown and Braver's studies that were inspired by the notion that neurons in the frontal region of the brain may dynamically and adaptively switch between multiple functions rather than statically accomplishing preset tasks.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Commentary-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0036-8075
1095-9203
DOI:10.1126/science.1109837