Optimal Configuration of a Square Array Group Testing Algorithm

We consider the optimal configuration of a square array group testing algorithm (denoted A2) to minimize the expected number of tests per specimen. For prevalence greater than 0.2498, individual testing is shown to be more efficient than A2. For prevalence less than 0.2498, closed form lower and upp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCommunications in statistics. Theory and methods Vol. 40; no. 3; pp. 436 - 448
Main Authors Hudgens, Michael G., Kim, Hae-Young
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia, PA Taylor & Francis Group 01.01.2011
Taylor & Francis
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0361-0926
1532-415X
DOI10.1080/03610920903391303

Cover

More Information
Summary:We consider the optimal configuration of a square array group testing algorithm (denoted A2) to minimize the expected number of tests per specimen. For prevalence greater than 0.2498, individual testing is shown to be more efficient than A2. For prevalence less than 0.2498, closed form lower and upper bounds on the optimal group sizes for A2 are given. Arrays of dimension 2 × 2, 3 × 3, and 4 × 4 are shown to never be optimal. The results are illustrated by considering the design of a specimen pooling algorithm for detection of recent HIV infections in Malawi.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ISSN:0361-0926
1532-415X
DOI:10.1080/03610920903391303