Search theory, competitive equilibrium, and the Nash bargaining solution

We investigate a canonical search-theoretic model without entry. Two agents are randomly matched with a long side being rationed. The matched agents face a pair of randomly drawn non-transferable payoffs, and then choose whether or not to form a partnership subject to a small probability of exogenou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of economic theory Vol. 148; no. 4; pp. 1659 - 1688
Main Authors Cho, In-Koo, Matsui, Akihiko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Inc 01.07.2013
Elsevier
Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-0531
1095-7235
DOI10.1016/j.jet.2013.04.003

Cover

More Information
Summary:We investigate a canonical search-theoretic model without entry. Two agents are randomly matched with a long side being rationed. The matched agents face a pair of randomly drawn non-transferable payoffs, and then choose whether or not to form a partnership subject to a small probability of exogenous break down. As this probability and friction vanish, the Nash bargaining solution emerges as the unique undominated strategy equilibrium outcome if the mass of each party is the same. If the size of one party is larger than the other, the short side extracts the entire surplus, a sharp contrast to Rubinstein and Wolinsky (1985) [16].
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0022-0531
1095-7235
DOI:10.1016/j.jet.2013.04.003