Probing regional cortical excitability via input–output properties using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography coupling

• Published in: Human brain mapping Vol. 41; no. 10; pp. 2741 - 2761
• Main Authors: Raffin, Estelle, Harquel, Sylvain, Passera, Brice, Chauvin, Alan, Bougerol, Thierry, David, Olivier
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.07.2020; Wiley
• Subjects: Cognitive science; Cortex (motor); cortical excitability; EEG; Electroencephalography; Excitability; input–output functions; linear regression; Magnetic fields; Magnetic properties; Neurons; Neurophysiology; Occipital lobe; Prefrontal cortex; Regression analysis; TMS–EEG; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; linear regression; input-output functions; TMS-EEG; cortical excitability
• ISSN: 1065-9471; 1097-0193; 1097-0193
• DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24975

The modular organization of the cortex refers to subsets of highly interconnected nodes, sharing specific cytoarchitectural and dynamical properties. These properties condition the level of excitability of local pools of neurons. In this study, we described TMS evoked potentials (TEP) input–output properties to provide new insights into regional cortical excitability. We combined robotized TMS with EEG to disentangle region‐specific TEP from threshold to saturation and describe their oscillatory contents. Twenty‐two young healthy participants received robotized TMS pulses over the right primary motor cortex (M1), the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the right superior occipital lobe (SOL) at five stimulation intensities (40, 60, 80, 100, and 120% resting motor threshold) and one short‐interval intracortical inhibition condition during EEG recordings. Ten additional subjects underwent the same experiment with a realistic sham TMS procedure. The results revealed interregional differences in the TEPs input–output functions as well as in the responses to paired‐pulse conditioning protocols, when considering early local components (<80 ms). Each intensity in the three regions was associated with complex patterns of oscillatory activities. The quality of the regression of TEPs over stimulation intensity was used to derive a new readout for cortical excitability and dynamical properties, revealing lower excitability in the DLPFC, followed by SOL and M1. The realistic sham experiment confirmed that these early local components were not contaminated by multisensory stimulations. This study provides an entirely new analytic framework to characterize input–output relations throughout the cortex, paving the way to a more accurate definition of local cortical excitability.