Association between intensive care unit nursing grade and mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock and its cost-effectiveness

• Published in: Critical care (London, England) Vol. 28; no. 1; p. 99
• Main Authors: Choi, Ki Hong, Kang, Danbee, Lee, Jin, Park, Hyejeong, Park, Taek Kyu, Lee, Joo Myung, Song, Young Bin, Hahn, Joo-Yong, Choi, Seung-Hyuk, Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol, Cho, Juhee, Yang, Jeong Hoon
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 25.03.2024; BioMed Central Ltd
• Subjects: Cardiac output; Cardiogenic shock; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Care and treatment; Codes; Cost analysis; Cost benefit analysis; CPR; Critical care; Critical Care Medicine; Diagnosis; Disease; Dopamine; Emergency medical care; Emergency Medicine; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Health aspects; Health care expenditures; Hemodialysis; Hospital costs; Hospital Mortality; Hospitalization; Humans; Intensive; Intensive care; Intensive care nursing; Intensive Care Units; Measurement; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Methods; Mortality; Nurses; Nursing; Nursing Staff, Hospital; Patient outcomes; Patients; Practice; Ratios; Shock, Cardiogenic; Ventilators; Willingness to pay; Workforce planning; Workload; South Korea; Cost-effectiveness; Cardiogenic shock; Mortality; Intensive care unit; Nurse staffing
• ISSN: 1364-8535; 1466-609X; 1364-8535; 1466-609X; 1366-609X
• DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04880-9

Background Despite the high workload of cardiac intensive care unit (ICU), there is a paucity of evidence on the association between nurse workforce and mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the ICU nursing grade on mortality and cost-effectiveness in CS. Methods A nationwide analysis was performed using the K-NHIS database. Patients diagnosed with CS and admitted to the ICU at tertiary hospitals were enrolled. ICU nursing grade was defined according to the bed-to-nurse ratio: grade1 (bed-to-nurse ratio < 0.5), grade2 (0.5 ≤ bed-to-nurse ratio < 0.63), and grade3 (0.63 ≤ bed-to-nurse ratio < 0.77) or above. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Cost-effective analysis was also performed. Results Of the 72,950 patients with CS, 27,216 (37.3%) were in ICU nursing grade 1, 29,710 (40.7%) in grade 2, and 16,024 (22.0%) in grade ≥ 3. The adjusted-OR for in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with grade 2 (grade 1 vs. grade 2, 30.6% vs. 37.5%, adjusted-OR 1.14, 95% CI1.09–1.19) and grade ≥ 3 (40.6%) with an adjusted-OR of 1.29 (95% CI 1.23–1.36) than those with grade 1. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of grade1 compared with grade 2 and ≥ 3 was $25,047/year and $42,888/year for hospitalization and $5151/year and $5269/year for 1-year follow-up, suggesting that grade 1 was cost-effective. In subgroup analysis, the beneficial effects of the high-intensity nursing grade on mortality were more prominent in patients who received CPR or multiple vasopressors usage. Conclusions For patients with CS, ICU grade 1 with a high-intensity nursing staff was associated with reduced mortality and more cost-effectiveness during hospitalization compared to grade 2 and grade ≥ 3, and its beneficial effects were more pronounced in subjects at high risk of CS. Graphical abstract