Factors affecting citation rates of research articles

This study examines whether there are some general trends across subject fields regarding the factors affecting the number of citations of articles, focusing especially on those factors that are not directly related to the quality or content of articles (extrinsic factors). For this purpose, from 6...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology Vol. 66; no. 4; pp. 739 - 764
Main Authors Onodera, Natsuo, Yoshikane, Fuyuki
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2015
Association for Information Science and Technology
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2330-1635
2330-1643
DOI10.1002/asi.23209

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study examines whether there are some general trends across subject fields regarding the factors affecting the number of citations of articles, focusing especially on those factors that are not directly related to the quality or content of articles (extrinsic factors). For this purpose, from 6 selected subject fields (condensed matter physics, inorganic and nuclear chemistry, electric and electronic engineering, biochemistry and molecular biology, physiology, and gastroenterology), original articles published in the same year were sampled (n = 230–240 for each field). Then, the citation counts received by the articles in relatively long citation windows (6 and 11 years after publication) were predicted by negative binomial multiple regression (NBMR) analysis for each field. Various article features about author collaboration, cited references, visibility, authors' achievements (measured by past publications and citedness), and publishing journals were considered as the explanatory variables of NBMR. Some generality across the fields was found with regard to the selected predicting factors and the degree of significance of these predictors. The Price index was the strongest predictor of citations, and number of references was the next. The effects of number of authors and authors' achievement measures were rather weak.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-QSB68XKW-M
istex:177F3F77D2875A2A2FDDBC8AE32E432F205459C6
ArticleID:ASI23209
JSPS KAKENHI - No. 18300080
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2330-1635
2330-1643
DOI:10.1002/asi.23209