Prognostic factors identified three risk groups in the LRF CLL4 trial, independent of treatment allocation

Many prognostic markers have been identified in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, but there have been few opportunities to assess their relative importance in a large randomized trial. The aim of this study was to determine which of the available markers independently predicted outcome in patients requi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHaematologica (Roma) Vol. 95; no. 10; pp. 1705 - 1712
Main Authors Oscier, D., Wade, R., Davis, Z., Morilla, A., Best, G., Richards, S., Else, M., Matutes, E., Catovsky, D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Pavia Ferrata Storti Foundation 01.10.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0390-6078
1592-8721
1592-8721
DOI10.3324/haematol.2010.025338

Cover

Abstract Many prognostic markers have been identified in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, but there have been few opportunities to assess their relative importance in a large randomized trial. The aim of this study was to determine which of the available markers independently predicted outcome in patients requiring treatment and to use these to define new risk groups. A broad panel of clinical and laboratory markers, measured at randomization in patients entering the LRF CLL4 trial, was assessed with respect to treatment response, progression-free and overall survival, at a median follow-up of 68 months. Using the factors identified as independent predictors for progression-free survival, patients were subdivided into three risk groups: 6% had poor risk with known TP53 loss of greater than 10%; 72% had an intermediate risk without TP53 loss (≤ 10%) and with at least one of: unmutated IGHV genes and/or IGHV3-21 usage, 11q deletion, β-2 microglobulin greater than 4 mg/L; 22% had a good risk (with none of the above and mutated IGHV genes). The 5-year progression-free survival rates for these three groups were 0%, 12% and 34%, respectively, and the corresponding 5-year overall survival rates were 9%, 53% and 79% (both P<0.00005 independent of treatment allocation). In the intermediate risk group 250 patients, with data for all three risk factors, were further subdivided into intermediate-low (one risk factor) or intermediate-high (2 or 3 risk factors). The 5-year progression-free survival rates were 18% and 7% (P=0.0001) and the 5-year overall survival rates were 68% and 40% (P<0.00005), respectively. This study demonstrates the role of biomarkers in prognosis and shows that, in patients requiring treatment, disease stage may no longer be an independent predictor of outcome. If validated independently, the risk groups defined here may inform the design of future trials in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
AbstractList Many prognostic markers have been identified in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, but there have been few opportunities to assess their relative importance in a large randomized trial. The aim of this study was to determine which of the available markers independently predicted outcome in patients requiring treatment and to use these to define new risk groups.BACKGROUNDMany prognostic markers have been identified in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, but there have been few opportunities to assess their relative importance in a large randomized trial. The aim of this study was to determine which of the available markers independently predicted outcome in patients requiring treatment and to use these to define new risk groups.A broad panel of clinical and laboratory markers, measured at randomization in patients entering the LRF CLL4 trial, was assessed with respect to treatment response, progression-free and overall survival, at a median follow-up of 68 months.DESIGN AND METHODSA broad panel of clinical and laboratory markers, measured at randomization in patients entering the LRF CLL4 trial, was assessed with respect to treatment response, progression-free and overall survival, at a median follow-up of 68 months.Using the factors identified as independent predictors for progression-free survival, patients were subdivided into three risk groups: 6% had poor risk with known TP53 loss of greater than 10%; 72% had an intermediate risk without TP53 loss (≤ 10%) and with at least one of: unmutated IGHV genes and/or IGHV3-21 usage, 11q deletion, β-2 microglobulin greater than 4 mg/L; 22% had a good risk (with none of the above and mutated IGHV genes). The 5-year progression-free survival rates for these three groups were 0%, 12% and 34%, respectively, and the corresponding 5-year overall survival rates were 9%, 53% and 79% (both P<0.00005 independent of treatment allocation). In the intermediate risk group 250 patients, with data for all three risk factors, were further subdivided into intermediate-low (one risk factor) or intermediate-high (2 or 3 risk factors). The 5-year progression-free survival rates were 18% and 7% (P=0.0001) and the 5-year overall survival rates were 68% and 40% (P<0.00005), respectively.RESULTSUsing the factors identified as independent predictors for progression-free survival, patients were subdivided into three risk groups: 6% had poor risk with known TP53 loss of greater than 10%; 72% had an intermediate risk without TP53 loss (≤ 10%) and with at least one of: unmutated IGHV genes and/or IGHV3-21 usage, 11q deletion, β-2 microglobulin greater than 4 mg/L; 22% had a good risk (with none of the above and mutated IGHV genes). The 5-year progression-free survival rates for these three groups were 0%, 12% and 34%, respectively, and the corresponding 5-year overall survival rates were 9%, 53% and 79% (both P<0.00005 independent of treatment allocation). In the intermediate risk group 250 patients, with data for all three risk factors, were further subdivided into intermediate-low (one risk factor) or intermediate-high (2 or 3 risk factors). The 5-year progression-free survival rates were 18% and 7% (P=0.0001) and the 5-year overall survival rates were 68% and 40% (P<0.00005), respectively.This study demonstrates the role of biomarkers in prognosis and shows that, in patients requiring treatment, disease stage may no longer be an independent predictor of outcome. If validated independently, the risk groups defined here may inform the design of future trials in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.CONCLUSIONSThis study demonstrates the role of biomarkers in prognosis and shows that, in patients requiring treatment, disease stage may no longer be an independent predictor of outcome. If validated independently, the risk groups defined here may inform the design of future trials in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Many prognostic markers have been identified in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, but there have been few opportunities to assess their relative importance in a large randomized trial. The aim of this study was to determine which of the available markers independently predicted outcome in patients requiring treatment and to use these to define new risk groups. A broad panel of clinical and laboratory markers, measured at randomization in patients entering the LRF CLL4 trial, was assessed with respect to treatment response, progression-free and overall survival, at a median follow-up of 68 months. Using the factors identified as independent predictors for progression-free survival, patients were subdivided into three risk groups: 6% had poor risk with known TP53 loss of greater than 10%; 72% had an intermediate risk without TP53 loss (≤ 10%) and with at least one of: unmutated IGHV genes and/or IGHV3-21 usage, 11q deletion, β-2 microglobulin greater than 4 mg/L; 22% had a good risk (with none of the above and mutated IGHV genes). The 5-year progression-free survival rates for these three groups were 0%, 12% and 34%, respectively, and the corresponding 5-year overall survival rates were 9%, 53% and 79% (both P<0.00005 independent of treatment allocation). In the intermediate risk group 250 patients, with data for all three risk factors, were further subdivided into intermediate-low (one risk factor) or intermediate-high (2 or 3 risk factors). The 5-year progression-free survival rates were 18% and 7% (P=0.0001) and the 5-year overall survival rates were 68% and 40% (P<0.00005), respectively. This study demonstrates the role of biomarkers in prognosis and shows that, in patients requiring treatment, disease stage may no longer be an independent predictor of outcome. If validated independently, the risk groups defined here may inform the design of future trials in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Background Many prognostic markers have been identified in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, but there have been few opportunities to assess their relative importance in a large randomized trial. The aim of this study was to determine which of the available markers independently predicted outcome in patients requiring treatment and to use these to define new risk groups.Design and Methods A broad panel of clinical and laboratory markers, measured at randomization in patients entering the LRF CLL4 trial, was assessed with respect to treatment response, progression-free and overall survival, at a median follow-up of 68 months.Results Using the factors identified as independent predictors for progression-free survival, patients were subdivided into three risk groups: 6% had poor risk with known TP53 loss of greater than 10%; 72% had an intermediate risk without TP53 loss (≤10%) and with at least one of: unmutated IGHV genes and/or IGHV3-21 usage, 11q deletion, β-2 microglobulin greater than 4 mg/L; 22% had a good risk (with none of the above and mutated IGHV genes). The 5-year progression-free survival rates for these three groups were 0%, 12% and 34%, respectively, and the corresponding 5-year overall survival rates were 9%, 53% and 79% (both P
Author David Oscier
Rachel Wade
Zadie Davis
Sue Richards
Daniel Catovsky
Monica Else
Alison Morilla
Estella Matutes
Giles Best
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Haematology, Royal Bournemouth Hospital
3 Section of Haemato-oncology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
2 Clinical Trial Service Unit, Oxford
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Clinical Trial Service Unit, Oxford
– name: 3 Section of Haemato-oncology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
– name: 1 Department of Haematology, Royal Bournemouth Hospital
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: D.
  surname: Oscier
  fullname: Oscier, D.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: R.
  surname: Wade
  fullname: Wade, R.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Z.
  surname: Davis
  fullname: Davis, Z.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: A.
  surname: Morilla
  fullname: Morilla, A.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: G.
  surname: Best
  fullname: Best, G.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: S.
  surname: Richards
  fullname: Richards, S.
– sequence: 7
  givenname: M.
  surname: Else
  fullname: Else, M.
– sequence: 8
  givenname: E.
  surname: Matutes
  fullname: Matutes, E.
– sequence: 9
  givenname: D.
  surname: Catovsky
  fullname: Catovsky, D.
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23371102$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20511662$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFUk1vEzEUtFARTQv_AKG9IC6k-GNtrzlUQlELlSKBEJwtr_c5cfCug70h4t_X26SFcuFked7MPI3enKGTIQ6A0EuCLxij9bu1gd6MMVxQXCBMOWPNEzQjXNF5Iyk5QTPMFJ4LLJtTdJbzBmOKlZLP0CnFnBAh6AxtvqS4GmIeva2csWNMufIdDKN3HrpqXCeAKvn8o1qluNuW4VBAqJZfr6vFcllXY_ImvC1wB1sYJmUVXUHBjP30MSFEa0Yfh-foqTMhw4vje46-X199W3yaLz9_vFl8WM4tZ3yct8Aok4wIY3jTCGewq63EzjZUMgaGd8S20tYghBVMSsbblsuuI5JJAGXYObo5-HbRbPQ2-d6k3zoar--AmFbapJI3gHYWSMMFU5LTWtVNQ0hLnbStqknTqrZ4XR68tru2h86WRMmER6aPJ4Nf61X8pWlxw0oUgzdHgxR_7iCPuvfZQghmgLjLWnIhhORyYr76e9XDjvtbFcLrI8Fka4JLZrA-_-ExJgnBE68-8GyKOSdwDxSC9VQdfV8dPVVHH6pTZO__kVk_3h2uBPPhf-JjzLVfrfc-gc59uXyJQvV-v1d8khOJObsFCQPaVQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0609_2011_01639_x
crossref_primary_10_1002_ajh_24660
crossref_primary_10_3109_10428194_2011_605188
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00277_018_3409_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tranon_2021_101176
crossref_primary_10_1586_era_11_132
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbmt_2013_11_032
crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_226
crossref_primary_10_1111_bjh_14132
crossref_primary_10_1038_clpt_2012_237
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41375_021_01165_w
crossref_primary_10_1182_asheducation_2010_1_90
crossref_primary_10_1002_cyto_a_23264
crossref_primary_10_1038_leu_2016_134
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_2011_41_0852
crossref_primary_10_1002_humu_22508
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms23094657
crossref_primary_10_1038_bcj_2016_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12308_010_0068_2
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_2010_32_0838
crossref_primary_10_3109_10428194_2013_809077
crossref_primary_10_1002_hon_2198
crossref_primary_10_1158_1078_0432_CCR_11_2936
crossref_primary_10_3109_10428194_2015_1137291
crossref_primary_10_2217_pme_13_33
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41375_020_0723_2
crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2011_11_312421
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12032_011_9872_5
crossref_primary_10_1111_bjh_15827
crossref_primary_10_3109_10428194_2015_1011641
crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_435983
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_beha_2016_08_002
crossref_primary_10_1111_bjh_15018
crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2010_09_305375
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hoc_2013_01_008
crossref_primary_10_1111_bjh_12067
crossref_primary_10_1586_era_12_2
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2141_2011_09000_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_bjh_17159
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmonc_2012_09_019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clml_2013_08_003
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina58010033
crossref_primary_10_1177_2040620711404469
crossref_primary_10_1186_1755_8166_7_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_leukres_2015_03_003
crossref_primary_10_1093_ajcp_aqab128
crossref_primary_10_1177_1078155219853030
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_leukres_2014_07_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_beha_2016_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1111_bjh_13940
crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2012_05_356014
crossref_primary_10_1186_1479_5876_10_18
crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2012_05_429282
crossref_primary_10_1038_leu_2010_288
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_25776
crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2013_07_516666
crossref_primary_10_1158_1078_0432_CCR_21_0701
crossref_primary_10_1038_bcj_2015_93
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_2011_36_9348
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_32353
crossref_primary_10_1038_leu_2012_209
crossref_primary_10_1182_asheducation_2010_1_481
crossref_primary_10_1111_bjh_13824
crossref_primary_10_14694_EdBook_AM_2012_32_224
crossref_primary_10_1002_ajh_24990
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pathol_2023_12_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_bjh_13498
crossref_primary_10_3109_10428194_2013_829919
crossref_primary_10_1038_leu_2011_49
crossref_primary_10_3923_ijcr_2015_150_158
crossref_primary_10_1038_leu_2015_217
crossref_primary_10_1002_ajh_25206
crossref_primary_10_3904_kjim_2015_074
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clml_2017_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1038_leu_2016_189
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cancergen_2013_01_003
crossref_primary_10_1002_ajh_23668
crossref_primary_10_2217_ijh_14_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hoc_2012_12_001
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41375_018_0146_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_htct_2020_05_005
crossref_primary_10_1038_leu_2013_190
crossref_primary_10_3109_10428194_2012_731598
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_celrep_2016_07_053
crossref_primary_10_3109_10428194_2012_692088
ContentType Journal Article
Contributor Catovsky, Daniel
Matutes, Estella
Oscier, David
Gregory, Walter
Gribben, John
Richards, Sue
Pepper, Chris
Kennedy, Ben
Bloor, Adrian
Hillmen, Peter
Hambin, Terry
Fegan, Christopher
Pettitt, Andrew
Wade, Rachel
Else, Monica
Dearden, Claire
Fenwick, Nicola
Follows, George
Marshall, Scott
Duncombe, Andrew
Nathwani, Amit
Cohen, Dena
Leach, Mike
Pocock, Christopher
Schuh, Anna
Devereux, Stephen
Contributor_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Adrian
  surname: Bloor
  fullname: Bloor, Adrian
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Amit
  surname: Nathwani
  fullname: Nathwani, Amit
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Andrew
  surname: Duncombe
  fullname: Duncombe, Andrew
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Andrew
  surname: Pettitt
  fullname: Pettitt, Andrew
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Anna
  surname: Schuh
  fullname: Schuh, Anna
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Ben
  surname: Kennedy
  fullname: Kennedy, Ben
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Chris
  surname: Pepper
  fullname: Pepper, Chris
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Christopher
  surname: Fegan
  fullname: Fegan, Christopher
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Christopher
  surname: Pocock
  fullname: Pocock, Christopher
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Claire
  surname: Dearden
  fullname: Dearden, Claire
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Daniel
  surname: Catovsky
  fullname: Catovsky, Daniel
– sequence: 12
  givenname: David
  surname: Oscier
  fullname: Oscier, David
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Dena
  surname: Cohen
  fullname: Cohen, Dena
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Estella
  surname: Matutes
  fullname: Matutes, Estella
– sequence: 15
  givenname: George
  surname: Follows
  fullname: Follows, George
– sequence: 16
  givenname: John
  surname: Gribben
  fullname: Gribben, John
– sequence: 17
  givenname: Mike
  surname: Leach
  fullname: Leach, Mike
– sequence: 18
  givenname: Monica
  surname: Else
  fullname: Else, Monica
– sequence: 19
  givenname: Nicola
  surname: Fenwick
  fullname: Fenwick, Nicola
– sequence: 20
  givenname: Peter
  surname: Hillmen
  fullname: Hillmen, Peter
– sequence: 21
  givenname: Rachel
  surname: Wade
  fullname: Wade, Rachel
– sequence: 22
  givenname: Scott
  surname: Marshall
  fullname: Marshall, Scott
– sequence: 23
  givenname: Stephen
  surname: Devereux
  fullname: Devereux, Stephen
– sequence: 24
  givenname: Sue
  surname: Richards
  fullname: Richards, Sue
– sequence: 25
  givenname: Terry
  surname: Hambin
  fullname: Hambin, Terry
– sequence: 26
  givenname: Walter
  surname: Gregory
  fullname: Gregory, Walter
Copyright 2015 INIST-CNRS
Copyright© Ferrata Storti Foundation
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright© Ferrata Storti Foundation
CorporateAuthor for the UK National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Working Group
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Working Group, UK National Cancer Research Institute
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: for the UK National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Working Group
– name: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Working Group, UK National Cancer Research Institute
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.3324/haematol.2010.025338
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Openly Available Collection - DOAJ
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1592-8721
EndPage 1712
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_fce1856397524948811b2f7cb9418b9b
PMC2948096
20511662
23371102
10_3324_haematol_2010_025338
www95_10_1705
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Medical Research Council
  grantid: MC_U137686856
GroupedDBID -
29I
2WC
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
ABFLS
ADACO
ADBBV
AENEX
AGCAB
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BCNDV
C1A
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
FRP
GROUPED_DOAJ
H13
HYE
KQ8
M~E
O0-
OK1
P2P
RHF
RHI
RNS
RPM
SJN
TFS
WOQ
WOW
ZA5
---
AAFWJ
AAYXX
AFPKN
AOIJS
BTFSW
CITATION
OVT
TR2
W8F
IQODW
UDS
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-be3237316aa5886fa0f4c70fc82733ea5d1cb7c4e66c637735bb57dd1737ee9a3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 0390-6078
1592-8721
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:21:47 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:30:23 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 07:59:56 EDT 2025
Sat May 31 02:09:26 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:16:15 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:21:41 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:10 EDT 2025
Tue Jan 05 20:16:42 EST 2021
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10
Keywords Prognosis
Hematology
progression-free survival
Malignant hemopathy
prognostic factors
Epidemiology
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
TP53 Gene
Lymphoproliferative syndrome
Risk factor
Progression free survival
overall survival
Clinical trial
Genetics
Mutation
ICHV mutation status
TP53
Cancer
Tumor suppressor gene
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c535t-be3237316aa5886fa0f4c70fc82733ea5d1cb7c4e66c637735bb57dd1737ee9a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/fce1856397524948811b2f7cb9418b9b
PMID 20511662
PQID 756667576
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fce1856397524948811b2f7cb9418b9b
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2948096
proquest_miscellaneous_756667576
pubmed_primary_20511662
pascalfrancis_primary_23371102
crossref_primary_10_3324_haematol_2010_025338
crossref_citationtrail_10_3324_haematol_2010_025338
highwire_smallpub2_www95_10_1705
ProviderPackageCode RHF
RHI
CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2010-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2010
  text: 2010-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Pavia
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Pavia
– name: Italy
PublicationTitle Haematologica (Roma)
PublicationTitleAlternate Haematologica
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher Ferrata Storti Foundation
Publisher_xml – name: Ferrata Storti Foundation
SSID ssj0020997
Score 2.3315725
Snippet Many prognostic markers have been identified in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, but there have been few opportunities to assess their relative importance in a...
Background Many prognostic markers have been identified in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, but there have been few opportunities to assess their relative...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
highwire
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1705
SubjectTerms Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis
Female
Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases
Humans
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell - mortality
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell - pathology
Leukemias. Malignant lymphomas. Malignant reticulosis. Myelofibrosis
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Original
Prognosis
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Assessment
Title Prognostic factors identified three risk groups in the LRF CLL4 trial, independent of treatment allocation
URI http://www.haematologica.org/content/95/10/1705.abstract
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20511662
https://www.proquest.com/docview/756667576
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC2948096
https://doaj.org/article/fce1856397524948811b2f7cb9418b9b
Volume 95
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlh9JLaZM-3EfQofRUE9uyJPuYhi6hbEopDeQmJHlEtiR2yTos-feZkR_dLYVcevNLlqUZWTOaT98w9gGE0K4MTapsXaGD0kBaFdCkeEYprkBKR0sDZ9_U6Xn59UJebKX6IkzYQA88dNxR8IBTCoWfZEFUJlWeuyJo7-oyr1zt6O-b1dnkTI2uFu0HjfGDGp0jnAWHTXMCrYejS0tkqN3VCOsq0N6pdialyN2_xRdMcEm7xh4LQ6qLf9mif0Mqt-aoxTP2dDQu-fHQqOfsEbT77OC4xQ-5vuMfeYR7xnX0ffb4bIyqH7Bf3286wtthKT7m3-GrZoARQcN7FDdwwqDzuAcEb7Z4Efjyx4KfLJclj6k_PvHVnFK3513gM4adU3B_WBp8wc4XX36enKZjDobUSyH71IEoBGW3slZWlQo2C6XXWfAV2j0CrGxy77QvQSmvhNZCOid10-RaaIDaipdsr-1aeM24VUGDrGo0KrLSejzQQQBqBBQ2QPAJE5MQjB8JyilPxpVBR4VEZybRGRKdGUSXsHQu9Xsg6Hjg-c8k3_lZoteOF1DpzKh05iGlSxiftMOsr7ETUfiF2Ww2taTKiaIoYYc7WjNXWODoQJurwHdMamRwSFOcxrbQ3a6NRhMb_TitEvZq0Ko_hfEfmiuFhfWOvu00Z_dOu7qMrOEFtgP91Tf_o_1v2ZOIooigxndsr7-5hfdonPXuMI7De5I2Nqg
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic+factors+identified+three+risk+groups+in+the+LRF+CLL4+trial%2C+independent+of+treatment+allocation&rft.jtitle=Haematologica+%28Roma%29&rft.au=Oscier%2C+D.&rft.au=Wade%2C+R.&rft.au=Davis%2C+Z.&rft.au=Morilla%2C+A.&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.issn=0390-6078&rft.eissn=1592-8721&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1705&rft.epage=1712&rft_id=info:doi/10.3324%2Fhaematol.2010.025338&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3324_haematol_2010_025338
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0390-6078&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0390-6078&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0390-6078&client=summon