Restraint use among nursing home residents: cross-sectional study and prospective cohort study
Aims and objectives. To investigate (1) the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive medication, (2) newly administered physical restraints, frequency of application of the devices and frequency of psychoactive medication on demand during 12‐month follow‐up and (3) characteristics associa...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of clinical nursing Vol. 18; no. 7; pp. 981 - 990 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.04.2009
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0962-1067 1365-2702 1365-2702 |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02460.x |
Cover
| Abstract | Aims and objectives. To investigate (1) the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive medication, (2) newly administered physical restraints, frequency of application of the devices and frequency of psychoactive medication on demand during 12‐month follow‐up and (3) characteristics associated with restraint use in nursing homes.
Background. High quality data on restraint use in German nursing homes are lacking so far. Such information is the basis for interventions to achieve a restraint‐free care.
Design. Cross‐sectional study and prospective cohort study.
Setting and subjects. Thirty nursing homes with 2367 residents in Hamburg, Germany.
Methods. External investigators obtained prevalence of physical restraints by direct observation on three occasions on one day, psychoactive drugs were extracted from residents’ records and prospective data were documented by nurses.
Results. Residents’ mean age was 86 years, 81% were female. Prevalence of residents with at least one physical restraint was 26·2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21·3–31·1]. Centre prevalence ranged from 4·4 to 58·9%. Bedrails were most often used (in 24·5% of residents), fixed tables, belts and other restraints were rare. Prevalence of residents with at least one psychoactive drug was 52·4% (95% CI 48·7–56·1). The proportion of residents with at least one physical restraint after the first observation week of 26·3% (21·3–31·3) cumulated to 39·5% (33·3–45·7) at the end of follow‐up (10·4 SD 3·3 months). The relative frequency of observation days with at least one device ranged from 4·9–64·8% between centres. No characteristic was found to explain centre differences.
Conclusions. The frequency of physical restraints and psychoactive drugs in German nursing homes is substantial. Pronounced centre variation suggests that standard care is possible without restraints.
Relevance to clinical practice. Effective restraint minimisation approaches are urgently warranted. An evidence‐based guideline may overcome centre differences towards a restraint‐free nursing home care. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Cross-sectional research in Germany to investigate the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive drugs at 30 elderly care nursing homes. Their frequency of use over 12 months was examined, and factors associated with their use were identified, including the clinical characteristics of restrained residents. [(BNI unique abstract)] 37 references Aims and objectives. To investigate (1) the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive medication, (2) newly administered physical restraints, frequency of application of the devices and frequency of psychoactive medication on demand during 12‐month follow‐up and (3) characteristics associated with restraint use in nursing homes. Background. High quality data on restraint use in German nursing homes are lacking so far. Such information is the basis for interventions to achieve a restraint‐free care. Design. Cross‐sectional study and prospective cohort study. Setting and subjects. Thirty nursing homes with 2367 residents in Hamburg, Germany. Methods. External investigators obtained prevalence of physical restraints by direct observation on three occasions on one day, psychoactive drugs were extracted from residents’ records and prospective data were documented by nurses. Results. Residents’ mean age was 86 years, 81% were female. Prevalence of residents with at least one physical restraint was 26·2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21·3–31·1]. Centre prevalence ranged from 4·4 to 58·9%. Bedrails were most often used (in 24·5% of residents), fixed tables, belts and other restraints were rare. Prevalence of residents with at least one psychoactive drug was 52·4% (95% CI 48·7–56·1). The proportion of residents with at least one physical restraint after the first observation week of 26·3% (21·3–31·3) cumulated to 39·5% (33·3–45·7) at the end of follow‐up (10·4 SD 3·3 months). The relative frequency of observation days with at least one device ranged from 4·9–64·8% between centres. No characteristic was found to explain centre differences. Conclusions. The frequency of physical restraints and psychoactive drugs in German nursing homes is substantial. Pronounced centre variation suggests that standard care is possible without restraints. Relevance to clinical practice. Effective restraint minimisation approaches are urgently warranted. An evidence‐based guideline may overcome centre differences towards a restraint‐free nursing home care. To investigate (1) the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive medication, (2) newly administered physical restraints, frequency of application of the devices and frequency of psychoactive medication on demand during 12-month follow-up and (3) characteristics associated with restraint use in nursing homes. High quality data on restraint use in German nursing homes are lacking so far. Such information is the basis for interventions to achieve a restraint-free care. Cross-sectional study and prospective cohort study. Thirty nursing homes with 2367 residents in Hamburg, Germany. External investigators obtained prevalence of physical restraints by direct observation on three occasions on one day, psychoactive drugs were extracted from residents' records and prospective data were documented by nurses. Residents' mean age was 86 years, 81% were female. Prevalence of residents with at least one physical restraint was 26.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21.3-31.1]. Centre prevalence ranged from 4.4 to 58.9%. Bedrails were most often used (in 24.5% of residents), fixed tables, belts and other restraints were rare. Prevalence of residents with at least one psychoactive drug was 52.4% (95% CI 48.7-56.1). The proportion of residents with at least one physical restraint after the first observation week of 26.3% (21.3-31.3) cumulated to 39.5% (33.3-45.7) at the end of follow-up (10.4 SD 3.3 months). The relative frequency of observation days with at least one device ranged from 4.9-64.8% between centres. No characteristic was found to explain centre differences. The frequency of physical restraints and psychoactive drugs in German nursing homes is substantial. Pronounced centre variation suggests that standard care is possible without restraints. Effective restraint minimisation approaches are urgently warranted. An evidence-based guideline may overcome centre differences towards a restraint-free nursing home care. Aims and objectives. To investigate (1) the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive medication, (2) newly administered physical restraints, frequency of application of the devices and frequency of psychoactive medication on demand during 12‐month follow‐up and (3) characteristics associated with restraint use in nursing homes. Background. High quality data on restraint use in German nursing homes are lacking so far. Such information is the basis for interventions to achieve a restraint‐free care. Design. Cross‐sectional study and prospective cohort study. Setting and subjects. Thirty nursing homes with 2367 residents in Hamburg, Germany. Methods. External investigators obtained prevalence of physical restraints by direct observation on three occasions on one day, psychoactive drugs were extracted from residents’ records and prospective data were documented by nurses. Results. Residents’ mean age was 86 years, 81% were female. Prevalence of residents with at least one physical restraint was 26·2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21·3–31·1]. Centre prevalence ranged from 4·4 to 58·9%. Bedrails were most often used (in 24·5% of residents), fixed tables, belts and other restraints were rare. Prevalence of residents with at least one psychoactive drug was 52·4% (95% CI 48·7–56·1). The proportion of residents with at least one physical restraint after the first observation week of 26·3% (21·3–31·3) cumulated to 39·5% (33·3–45·7) at the end of follow‐up (10·4 SD 3·3 months). The relative frequency of observation days with at least one device ranged from 4·9–64·8% between centres. No characteristic was found to explain centre differences. Conclusions. The frequency of physical restraints and psychoactive drugs in German nursing homes is substantial. Pronounced centre variation suggests that standard care is possible without restraints. Relevance to clinical practice. Effective restraint minimisation approaches are urgently warranted. An evidence‐based guideline may overcome centre differences towards a restraint‐free nursing home care. To investigate (1) the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive medication, (2) newly administered physical restraints, frequency of application of the devices and frequency of psychoactive medication on demand during 12-month follow-up and (3) characteristics associated with restraint use in nursing homes. High quality data on restraint use in German nursing homes are lacking so far. Such information is the basis for interventions to achieve a restraint-free care. Cross-sectional study and prospective cohort study. Thirty nursing homes with 2367 residents in Hamburg, Germany. External investigators obtained prevalence of physical restraints by direct observation on three occasions on one day, psychoactive drugs were extracted from residents' records and prospective data were documented by nurses. Residents' mean age was 86 years, 81% were female. Prevalence of residents with at least one physical restraint was 26.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21.3-31.1]. Centre prevalence ranged from 4.4 to 58.9%. Bedrails were most often used (in 24.5% of residents), fixed tables, belts and other restraints were rare. Prevalence of residents with at least one psychoactive drug was 52.4% (95% CI 48.7-56.1). The proportion of residents with at least one physical restraint after the first observation week of 26.3% (21.3-31.3) cumulated to 39.5% (33.3-45.7) at the end of follow-up (10.4 SD 3.3 months). The relative frequency of observation days with at least one device ranged from 4.9-64.8% between centres. No characteristic was found to explain centre differences. The frequency of physical restraints and psychoactive drugs in German nursing homes is substantial. Pronounced centre variation suggests that standard care is possible without restraints. Effective restraint minimisation approaches are urgently warranted. An evidence-based guideline may overcome centre differences towards a restraint-free nursing home care. To investigate (1) the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive medication, (2) newly administered physical restraints, frequency of application of the devices and frequency of psychoactive medication on demand during 12-month follow-up and (3) characteristics associated with restraint use in nursing homes.AIMS AND OBJECTIVESTo investigate (1) the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive medication, (2) newly administered physical restraints, frequency of application of the devices and frequency of psychoactive medication on demand during 12-month follow-up and (3) characteristics associated with restraint use in nursing homes.High quality data on restraint use in German nursing homes are lacking so far. Such information is the basis for interventions to achieve a restraint-free care.BACKGROUNDHigh quality data on restraint use in German nursing homes are lacking so far. Such information is the basis for interventions to achieve a restraint-free care.Cross-sectional study and prospective cohort study.DESIGNCross-sectional study and prospective cohort study.Thirty nursing homes with 2367 residents in Hamburg, Germany.SETTING AND SUBJECTSThirty nursing homes with 2367 residents in Hamburg, Germany.External investigators obtained prevalence of physical restraints by direct observation on three occasions on one day, psychoactive drugs were extracted from residents' records and prospective data were documented by nurses.METHODSExternal investigators obtained prevalence of physical restraints by direct observation on three occasions on one day, psychoactive drugs were extracted from residents' records and prospective data were documented by nurses.Residents' mean age was 86 years, 81% were female. Prevalence of residents with at least one physical restraint was 26.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21.3-31.1]. Centre prevalence ranged from 4.4 to 58.9%. Bedrails were most often used (in 24.5% of residents), fixed tables, belts and other restraints were rare. Prevalence of residents with at least one psychoactive drug was 52.4% (95% CI 48.7-56.1). The proportion of residents with at least one physical restraint after the first observation week of 26.3% (21.3-31.3) cumulated to 39.5% (33.3-45.7) at the end of follow-up (10.4 SD 3.3 months). The relative frequency of observation days with at least one device ranged from 4.9-64.8% between centres. No characteristic was found to explain centre differences.RESULTSResidents' mean age was 86 years, 81% were female. Prevalence of residents with at least one physical restraint was 26.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21.3-31.1]. Centre prevalence ranged from 4.4 to 58.9%. Bedrails were most often used (in 24.5% of residents), fixed tables, belts and other restraints were rare. Prevalence of residents with at least one psychoactive drug was 52.4% (95% CI 48.7-56.1). The proportion of residents with at least one physical restraint after the first observation week of 26.3% (21.3-31.3) cumulated to 39.5% (33.3-45.7) at the end of follow-up (10.4 SD 3.3 months). The relative frequency of observation days with at least one device ranged from 4.9-64.8% between centres. No characteristic was found to explain centre differences.The frequency of physical restraints and psychoactive drugs in German nursing homes is substantial. Pronounced centre variation suggests that standard care is possible without restraints.CONCLUSIONSThe frequency of physical restraints and psychoactive drugs in German nursing homes is substantial. Pronounced centre variation suggests that standard care is possible without restraints.Effective restraint minimisation approaches are urgently warranted. An evidence-based guideline may overcome centre differences towards a restraint-free nursing home care.RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICEEffective restraint minimisation approaches are urgently warranted. An evidence-based guideline may overcome centre differences towards a restraint-free nursing home care. |
| Author | Haastert, Burkhard Köpke, Sascha Meyer, Gabriele Mühlhauser, Ingrid |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Gabriele surname: Meyer fullname: Meyer, Gabriele organization: Authors:Gabriele Meyer, PhD, Professor, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Nursing Science, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany; Sascha Köpke, PhD, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Burkhard Haastert, PhD, MediStatistica, Lambertusweg 1b, Neuenrade, Germany; Ingrid Mühlhauser, MD, Professor, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany – sequence: 2 givenname: Sascha surname: Köpke fullname: Köpke, Sascha organization: Authors:Gabriele Meyer, PhD, Professor, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Nursing Science, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany; Sascha Köpke, PhD, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Burkhard Haastert, PhD, MediStatistica, Lambertusweg 1b, Neuenrade, Germany; Ingrid Mühlhauser, MD, Professor, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany – sequence: 3 givenname: Burkhard surname: Haastert fullname: Haastert, Burkhard organization: Authors:Gabriele Meyer, PhD, Professor, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Nursing Science, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany; Sascha Köpke, PhD, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Burkhard Haastert, PhD, MediStatistica, Lambertusweg 1b, Neuenrade, Germany; Ingrid Mühlhauser, MD, Professor, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany – sequence: 4 givenname: Ingrid surname: Mühlhauser fullname: Mühlhauser, Ingrid organization: Authors:Gabriele Meyer, PhD, Professor, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Nursing Science, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany; Sascha Köpke, PhD, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Burkhard Haastert, PhD, MediStatistica, Lambertusweg 1b, Neuenrade, Germany; Ingrid Mühlhauser, MD, Professor, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19284433$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNkV1vFCEYhYlpY7fVv2CIF3o1U75hvDBpVu1HmjYxa-qVBBnGss4wK8zo7r-X6a570QuVkEB4n_cA5xyDg9AHBwDEqMR5nC5LTAUviESkJAipEhEmULl-Amb7wgGYoUqQAiMhj8BxSkuEMCWEPgVHuCKKMUpn4MtHl4ZofBjgmBw0XR--wTDG5PN633cORpd87cKQ3kAb-5SK5Ozg-2BamIax3kATarjKldV0_tNB29_3cdgWn4HDxrTJPd-tJ-DTh_eL-UVxfXt-OT-7LiynGBVEVQ2tDbeOSsYbJSyipMIc1Y1qRMOs40o6VLOmMjVniiiLGFE491gqjaAn4PVWNz_kx5i_pDufrGtbE1w_Ji0FoypPnMlXfyWFRJQKRjL48hG47MeYv500oRxhwuQEvdhB49fO1XoVfWfiRv8xOANvt8CDd9E12vrBTP5NrrcaIz0lqpd6Ck5PwekpUf2QqF5nAfVIYH_Hv1t3d__yrdv8d5--up3fTNssUGwFfBrcei9g4vdsE5Vc392c6wWV6t3ni4W-o78BPUPHDQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2702_2011_03931_x crossref_primary_10_1089_jpm_2012_0165 crossref_primary_10_1097_NUR_0b013e3182a0baec crossref_primary_10_1177_1471301217746751 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_015_0086_0 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD007546_pub3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2018_07_019 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00391_023_02263_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10433_019_00511_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2013_05_005 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD007546_pub2 crossref_primary_10_1111_jocn_12384 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_022_03450_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2012_07_013 crossref_primary_10_1515_rns_2011_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_zefq_2014_09_007 crossref_primary_10_1111_jan_14694 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2318_9_18 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2011_08_009 crossref_primary_10_12968_ijtr_2009_16_11_44938 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_regg_2015_07_009 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00391_017_1228_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arr_2011_07_002 crossref_primary_10_1111_jnu_12087 crossref_primary_10_1111_jonm_13827 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_017_0616_z crossref_primary_10_3238_arztebl_2016_0092 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18073639 crossref_primary_10_1017_S104161021200018X crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_5415_2011_03662_x crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2318_10_11 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00481_014_0317_5 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_015_0150_9 crossref_primary_10_4276_030802212X13383757345021 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_020_1499_y crossref_primary_10_1111_jgs_12057 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1041610216000028 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40266_015_0333_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2013_10_004 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgs_14435 crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_180784 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2019_03_017 crossref_primary_10_1177_1054773813493112 crossref_primary_10_1177_23337214231189930 crossref_primary_10_1111_inr_12434 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_zefq_2011_11_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_regg_2013_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2702_2011_03971_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s00115_021_01150_9 crossref_primary_10_1177_1054773820907805 crossref_primary_10_1111_scs_12345 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina59101847 crossref_primary_10_1111_jocn_13504 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11818_013_0639_4 crossref_primary_10_1093_ageing_afx014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jamda_2011_03_007 crossref_primary_10_1093_ageing_afu143 crossref_primary_10_1111_ppc_12335 crossref_primary_10_1111_jocn_13778 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12439_013_0047_z crossref_primary_10_1097_NCQ_0b013e31822f2e81 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jamda_2013_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0043_1769580 crossref_primary_10_1097_YIC_0000000000000173 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_015_0125_x crossref_primary_10_1089_jpm_2014_0354 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11152204 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anr_2012_10_007 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0144686X19000680 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2702_2008_02621_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2702_2012_04153_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1547_5069_2010_01341_x crossref_primary_10_1111_jan_12176 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_017_0421_8 crossref_primary_10_3928_00989134_20140407_03 crossref_primary_10_11124_JBISRIR_2017_003457 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00391_010_0111_z crossref_primary_10_1177_1533317514531441 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00228_016_2059_4 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17186738 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1041610212000014 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2318_14_39 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_regg_2010_09_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2011_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_opn_12218 crossref_primary_10_1177_0969733012473012 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajag_13375 crossref_primary_10_1024_1012_5302_a000664 crossref_primary_10_3238_arztebl_2012_0376c crossref_primary_10_3390_geriatrics4030050 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2318_9_42 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_015_0268_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_regg_2019_05_006 crossref_primary_10_1515_pubhef_2018_0145 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph182211918 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2020_103856 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1093/ageing/afl131 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02885.x 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00645.x 10.1093/gerona/59.9.M919 10.1001/jama.1991.03460040044026 10.1093/ageing/afl065 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01406.x 10.1007/s00391-005-0286-x 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<377::AID-SIM799>3.0.CO;2-N 10.1186/1472-6955-3-5 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb04303.x 10.1136/bmj.39343.649097.55 10.1186/1471-2318-6-17 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01082.x 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.030 10.2105/AJPH.90.1.92 10.1001/jama.293.5.596 10.1007/BF00985768 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb02999.x 10.1093/gerona/53A.1.M47 10.1016/j.apnu.2006.04.004 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15473-1 10.1097/00005650-200210000-00005 10.1056/NEJMoa061240 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51355.x 10.1007/s00391-006-0401-7 10.1007/s00391-005-0293-y |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Apr 2009 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd – notice: Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Apr 2009 |
| DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ASE FPQ K6X NAPCQ 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02460.x |
| DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed British Nursing Index British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present) British Nursing Index Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Nursing & Allied Health Premium British Nursing Index MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | British Nursing Index CrossRef MEDLINE Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Nursing |
| EISSN | 1365-2702 |
| EndPage | 990 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 1662882551 19284433 10_1111_j_1365_2702_2008_02460_x JOCN2460 ark_67375_WNG_T378DXHT_W |
| Genre | article Journal Article Feature |
| GeographicLocations | Germany Hamburg Germany |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Germany – name: Hamburg Germany |
| GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29K 31~ 33P 36B 3EH 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8F7 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAIPD AAKAS AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAYEP AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIVO ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACHQT ACMXC ACNCT ACPOU ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZCM ADZMN AEFGJ AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHEFC AIACR AIAGR AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE AITYG AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F D-I DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EAU EBS EIHBH EJD EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FZ0 G-S G.N GJSGG GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 ML0 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TEORI UB1 UKR V8K V9Y VVN W8V W99 WBKPD WEIWN WH7 WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOQ WOW WQ9 WQJ WXI WXSBR XG1 YFH YOC YUY ZFV ZT4 ZZTAW ~G0 ~IA ~WT AAHHS ACCFJ AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AIWBW AJBDE ESX WRC WUP YCJ AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ASE FPQ K6X NAPCQ 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5310-289f3da5ce3745f86c0329150df8f6f4ce587e0d4f9ad54828c042813dac37a63 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 0962-1067 1365-2702 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 06:33:26 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 18:28:35 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 05:50:49 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:56:52 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:16:57 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:21 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:46:52 EST 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:20:18 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 7 |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5310-289f3da5ce3745f86c0329150df8f6f4ce587e0d4f9ad54828c042813dac37a63 |
| Notes | ArticleID:JOCN2460 istex:713726834BB23B4EDAE9BE1E7B296CA17AF792E7 ark:/67375/WNG-T378DXHT-W SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 |
| PMID | 19284433 |
| PQID | 235012472 |
| PQPubID | 29947 |
| PageCount | 10 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_764384381 proquest_miscellaneous_67033642 proquest_journals_235012472 pubmed_primary_19284433 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1365_2702_2008_02460_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2702_2008_02460_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2702_2008_02460_x_JOCN2460 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_T378DXHT_W |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | April 2009 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2009-04-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2009 text: April 2009 |
| PublicationDecade | 2000 |
| PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK – name: England – name: Oxford |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of clinical nursing |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Clin Nurs |
| PublicationYear | 2009 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | Hamers JPH & Huizing AR (2005) Why do we use physical restraints in the elderly? Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 38, 19-25. Alanen HM, Finne-Soveri H, Noro A & Leinonen E (2006) Use of antipsychotics among nonagenarian residents in long-term institutional care in Finland. Age and Ageing 35, 508-513. Donner A & Klar N (2000) Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold, London. Karlsson S, Bucht G, Eriksson S & Sandman PO (1996) Physical restraints in geriatric care in Sweden: prevalence and patient characteristics. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 44, 1348-1354. Lai CKY, Wong TKS, Chow SKY, Kong SKF, Suen LKP, Chan CK, Leung JSC, Kong TK & Wong IYC (2007) Why is it so hard for nurses to take off the restraints? Abstract, The 18th Congress of the International Association of Gerontology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2005.. Gerontology 53, 489. Cohen-Mansfield J (1986) Agitated behaviors in the elderly. II. Preliminary results in the cognitively deteriorated. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 34, 722-727. Sullivan-Marx EM, Strumpf NE, Evans LK, Baumgarten M & Maislin G (1999) Predictors of continued physical restraint use in nursing homes residents following restraint reduction efforts. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 47, 342-348. Capezuti E, Strumpf NE, Evans LK, Grisso JA & Maislin G (1998) The relationship between physical restraint removal and falls and injuries among nursing home residents. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 53, M47-M52. Molter-Bock E, Hasford J & Pfundstein T (2006) Psychopharmakologische Behandlungspraxis in Münchener Altenpflegeheimen [Psychopharmacological drug treatment in Munich nursing homes]. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 39, 336-343. French DD, Campbell RR, Spehar AM & Accomando J (2007) How well do psychotropic medications match mental health diagnoses? A national view of potential off-label prescribing in VHA nursing homes. Age and Ageing 36, 107-108. Meyer G, Köpke S & Mühlhauser I (2005) Mobilitätsrestriktionen in Alten- und Pflegeheimen: eine multizentrische Beobachtungsstudie [Physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicenter observation study]. Pflege und Gesellschaft 10, 37-39. O'Keeffe ST (2004) Down with bedrails? Lancet 363, 343. Dalichau G, Grüner H & Müller−Alten L (2002) SGB XI - Pflegeversicherung. Kommentar und Rechtssammlung [SGB XI - Statutory care insurance. Comment and collection of statutes]. RS Schulz, Starnberg. Huizing AR, Hamers JPH, Gulpers MJM & Berger MP (2006) Short-term effects of an educational intervention on physical restraint use: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Geriatrics 7, 17. Weyerer S, Schäufele M & Hendlmeier I (2005) Besondere und traditionelle stationäre Betreuung demenzkranker Menschen im Vergleich [A comparison of special and traditional inpatient care of people with dementia]. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 38, 85-94. Williams RL (2000) A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics 56, 645-646. Schneider LS, Tariot PN, Dagerman KS, Davis SM, Hsiao JK, Ismail MS, Lebowitz BD, Lyketsos CG, Ryan JM, Stroup TS, Sultzer DL, Weintraub D, Lieberman JA & CATIE-AD Study Group (2006) Effectiveness of atypical antipsychotic drugs in patients with Alzheimer's disease. The New England Journal of Medicine 355, 1525-1538. Bourbonniere M, Strumpf NE, Evans LK & Maislin G (2003) Organizational characteristics and restraint use for hospitalized nursing home residents. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 51, 1079-1084. Flaherty JH (2004) Zero tolerance for physical restraints: difficult but not impossible. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 59, 919-920. Sink KM, Holden KF & Yaffe K (2005) Pharmacological treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia: a review of the evidence. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 293, 596-608. Williams RL (1995) Product limit survival functions with correlated survival times. Lifetime Data Analysis 1, 171-186. Welz-Barth A & Füsgen I (2007) Dementia patients in nursing homes. European Journal of Geriatrics 9(Suppl), 23-28. Castle NG (2002) Nursing homes with persistent deficiency citations for physical restraint use. Medical Care 40, 868-878. Hamers JPH, Gulpers MJM & Strik W (2004) Use of physical restraints with cognitively impaired nursing home residents. Journal of Advanced Nursing 45, 246-251. Rogers WH (1993) Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin 13, 19-23. Tinetti ME, Liu WL, Marottoli RA & Ginter SF (1991) Mechanical restraint use among residents of skilled nursing facilities. Prevalence, patterns and predictors. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 265, 468-471. Capezuti E, Wagner LM, Brush BL, Boltz M, Renz S & Talerico KA (2007) Consequences of an intervention to reduce restrictive side rail use in nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 55, 334-341. Huizing AR, Hamers JPH, De Jonge J, Candel M & Berger MP (2007) Organisational determinants of the use of physical restraints: a multilevel approach. Social Science and Medicine 65, 924-933. Laurin D, Voyer P, Verreault R & Durand PJ (2004) Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: a comparison of two data collection methods. BMC Nursing 3, 5. Kolanowski A, Fick D, Waller JL & Ahern F (2006) Outcomes of antipsychotic drug use in community-dwelling elders with dementia. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 20, 217-225. Kerry SM & Bland JM (2001) Unequal cluster sizes for trials in English and Welsh general practice: implications for sample size calculations. Statistics in Medicine 20, 377-390. Phillips CD, Spry KM, Sloane PD & Hawes C (2000) Use of physical restraints and psychotropic medications in Alzheimer special care units in nursing homes. American Journal of Public Health 90, 92-96. 2004; 363 2005; 293 2006; 35 1986; 34 2006; 39 2004; 45 1999; 47 2006; 7 2004; 3 1974 2005 2000; 90 2004 2002 2007; 53 1995; 1 2003; 51 2007; 55 2007; 36 2001; 20 2006; 355 1993; 13 2006; 20 1991; 265 2000 2000; 56 2002; 40 2004; 59 2007; 9 2005; 10 2005; 38 2007; 65 1998; 53 1996; 44 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 Welz‐Barth A (e_1_2_7_35_1) 2007; 9 e_1_2_7_18_1 Rogers WH (e_1_2_7_30_1) 1993; 13 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 McFadden D (e_1_2_7_24_1) 1974 Meyer G (e_1_2_7_25_1) 2005; 10 e_1_2_7_31_1 e_1_2_7_32_1 Tinetti ME (e_1_2_7_34_1) 1991; 265 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 e_1_2_7_36_1 e_1_2_7_37_1 Lai CKY (e_1_2_7_22_1) 2007; 53 e_1_2_7_38_1 Dalichau G (e_1_2_7_9_1) 2002 19284439 - J Clin Nurs. 2009 Apr;18(7):1078-9 |
| References_xml | – reference: Hamers JPH, Gulpers MJM & Strik W (2004) Use of physical restraints with cognitively impaired nursing home residents. Journal of Advanced Nursing 45, 246-251. – reference: Cohen-Mansfield J (1986) Agitated behaviors in the elderly. II. Preliminary results in the cognitively deteriorated. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 34, 722-727. – reference: Tinetti ME, Liu WL, Marottoli RA & Ginter SF (1991) Mechanical restraint use among residents of skilled nursing facilities. Prevalence, patterns and predictors. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 265, 468-471. – reference: Donner A & Klar N (2000) Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold, London. – reference: Dalichau G, Grüner H & Müller−Alten L (2002) SGB XI - Pflegeversicherung. Kommentar und Rechtssammlung [SGB XI - Statutory care insurance. Comment and collection of statutes]. RS Schulz, Starnberg. – reference: Bourbonniere M, Strumpf NE, Evans LK & Maislin G (2003) Organizational characteristics and restraint use for hospitalized nursing home residents. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 51, 1079-1084. – reference: Huizing AR, Hamers JPH, Gulpers MJM & Berger MP (2006) Short-term effects of an educational intervention on physical restraint use: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Geriatrics 7, 17. – reference: Williams RL (1995) Product limit survival functions with correlated survival times. Lifetime Data Analysis 1, 171-186. – reference: Williams RL (2000) A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics 56, 645-646. – reference: O'Keeffe ST (2004) Down with bedrails? Lancet 363, 343. – reference: Rogers WH (1993) Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin 13, 19-23. – reference: Flaherty JH (2004) Zero tolerance for physical restraints: difficult but not impossible. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 59, 919-920. – reference: Sink KM, Holden KF & Yaffe K (2005) Pharmacological treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia: a review of the evidence. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 293, 596-608. – reference: Capezuti E, Strumpf NE, Evans LK, Grisso JA & Maislin G (1998) The relationship between physical restraint removal and falls and injuries among nursing home residents. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 53, M47-M52. – reference: Huizing AR, Hamers JPH, De Jonge J, Candel M & Berger MP (2007) Organisational determinants of the use of physical restraints: a multilevel approach. Social Science and Medicine 65, 924-933. – reference: Kolanowski A, Fick D, Waller JL & Ahern F (2006) Outcomes of antipsychotic drug use in community-dwelling elders with dementia. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 20, 217-225. – reference: Laurin D, Voyer P, Verreault R & Durand PJ (2004) Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: a comparison of two data collection methods. BMC Nursing 3, 5. – reference: Weyerer S, Schäufele M & Hendlmeier I (2005) Besondere und traditionelle stationäre Betreuung demenzkranker Menschen im Vergleich [A comparison of special and traditional inpatient care of people with dementia]. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 38, 85-94. – reference: Kerry SM & Bland JM (2001) Unequal cluster sizes for trials in English and Welsh general practice: implications for sample size calculations. Statistics in Medicine 20, 377-390. – reference: Sullivan-Marx EM, Strumpf NE, Evans LK, Baumgarten M & Maislin G (1999) Predictors of continued physical restraint use in nursing homes residents following restraint reduction efforts. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 47, 342-348. – reference: Alanen HM, Finne-Soveri H, Noro A & Leinonen E (2006) Use of antipsychotics among nonagenarian residents in long-term institutional care in Finland. Age and Ageing 35, 508-513. – reference: Castle NG (2002) Nursing homes with persistent deficiency citations for physical restraint use. Medical Care 40, 868-878. – reference: Schneider LS, Tariot PN, Dagerman KS, Davis SM, Hsiao JK, Ismail MS, Lebowitz BD, Lyketsos CG, Ryan JM, Stroup TS, Sultzer DL, Weintraub D, Lieberman JA & CATIE-AD Study Group (2006) Effectiveness of atypical antipsychotic drugs in patients with Alzheimer's disease. The New England Journal of Medicine 355, 1525-1538. – reference: Hamers JPH & Huizing AR (2005) Why do we use physical restraints in the elderly? Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 38, 19-25. – reference: Meyer G, Köpke S & Mühlhauser I (2005) Mobilitätsrestriktionen in Alten- und Pflegeheimen: eine multizentrische Beobachtungsstudie [Physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicenter observation study]. Pflege und Gesellschaft 10, 37-39. – reference: Karlsson S, Bucht G, Eriksson S & Sandman PO (1996) Physical restraints in geriatric care in Sweden: prevalence and patient characteristics. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 44, 1348-1354. – reference: Lai CKY, Wong TKS, Chow SKY, Kong SKF, Suen LKP, Chan CK, Leung JSC, Kong TK & Wong IYC (2007) Why is it so hard for nurses to take off the restraints? Abstract, The 18th Congress of the International Association of Gerontology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2005.. Gerontology 53, 489. – reference: Molter-Bock E, Hasford J & Pfundstein T (2006) Psychopharmakologische Behandlungspraxis in Münchener Altenpflegeheimen [Psychopharmacological drug treatment in Munich nursing homes]. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 39, 336-343. – reference: Capezuti E, Wagner LM, Brush BL, Boltz M, Renz S & Talerico KA (2007) Consequences of an intervention to reduce restrictive side rail use in nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 55, 334-341. – reference: French DD, Campbell RR, Spehar AM & Accomando J (2007) How well do psychotropic medications match mental health diagnoses? A national view of potential off-label prescribing in VHA nursing homes. Age and Ageing 36, 107-108. – reference: Phillips CD, Spry KM, Sloane PD & Hawes C (2000) Use of physical restraints and psychotropic medications in Alzheimer special care units in nursing homes. American Journal of Public Health 90, 92-96. – reference: Welz-Barth A & Füsgen I (2007) Dementia patients in nursing homes. European Journal of Geriatrics 9(Suppl), 23-28. – volume: 56 start-page: 645 year: 2000 end-page: 646 article-title: A note on robust variance estimation for cluster‐correlated data publication-title: Biometrics – volume: 44 start-page: 1348 year: 1996 end-page: 1354 article-title: Physical restraints in geriatric care in Sweden: prevalence and patient characteristics publication-title: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society – year: 2005 – start-page: 104 year: 1974 end-page: 142 – volume: 3 start-page: 5 year: 2004 article-title: Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: a comparison of two data collection methods publication-title: BMC Nursing – volume: 355 start-page: 1525 year: 2006 end-page: 1538 article-title: Effectiveness of atypical antipsychotic drugs in patients with Alzheimer’s disease publication-title: The New England Journal of Medicine – volume: 293 start-page: 596 year: 2005 end-page: 608 article-title: Pharmacological treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia: a review of the evidence publication-title: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association – year: 2000 – volume: 35 start-page: 508 year: 2006 end-page: 513 article-title: Use of antipsychotics among nonagenarian residents in long‐term institutional care in Finland publication-title: Age and Ageing – volume: 45 start-page: 246 year: 2004 end-page: 251 article-title: Use of physical restraints with cognitively impaired nursing home residents publication-title: Journal of Advanced Nursing – volume: 20 start-page: 377 year: 2001 end-page: 390 article-title: Unequal cluster sizes for trials in English and Welsh general practice: implications for sample size calculations publication-title: Statistics in Medicine – volume: 20 start-page: 217 year: 2006 end-page: 225 article-title: Outcomes of antipsychotic drug use in community‐dwelling elders with dementia publication-title: Archives of Psychiatric Nursing – volume: 53 start-page: 489 year: 2007 article-title: Why is it so hard for nurses to take off the restraints? Abstract, The 18th Congress of the International Association of Gerontology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2005. publication-title: Gerontology – volume: 47 start-page: 342 year: 1999 end-page: 348 article-title: Predictors of continued physical restraint use in nursing homes residents following restraint reduction efforts publication-title: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society – volume: 51 start-page: 1079 year: 2003 end-page: 1084 article-title: Organizational characteristics and restraint use for hospitalized nursing home residents publication-title: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society – volume: 38 start-page: 19 year: 2005 end-page: 25 article-title: Why do we use physical restraints in the elderly? publication-title: Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie – volume: 39 start-page: 336 year: 2006 end-page: 343 article-title: Psychopharmakologische Behandlungspraxis in Münchener Altenpflegeheimen [Psychopharmacological drug treatment in Munich nursing homes] publication-title: Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie – volume: 40 start-page: 868 year: 2002 end-page: 878 article-title: Nursing homes with persistent deficiency citations for physical restraint use publication-title: Medical Care – volume: 1 start-page: 171 year: 1995 end-page: 186 article-title: Product limit survival functions with correlated survival times publication-title: Lifetime Data Analysis – volume: 55 start-page: 334 year: 2007 end-page: 341 article-title: Consequences of an intervention to reduce restrictive side rail use in nursing homes publication-title: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society – volume: 265 start-page: 468 year: 1991 end-page: 471 article-title: Mechanical restraint use among residents of skilled nursing facilities. Prevalence, patterns and predictors publication-title: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association – volume: 9 start-page: 23 issue: Suppl year: 2007 end-page: 28 article-title: Dementia patients in nursing homes publication-title: European Journal of Geriatrics – year: 2002 – volume: 7 start-page: 17 year: 2006 article-title: Short‐term effects of an educational intervention on physical restraint use: a cluster randomized trial publication-title: BMC Geriatrics – year: 2004 – volume: 38 start-page: 85 year: 2005 end-page: 94 article-title: Besondere und traditionelle stationäre Betreuung demenzkranker Menschen im Vergleich [A comparison of special and traditional inpatient care of people with dementia] publication-title: Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie – volume: 90 start-page: 92 year: 2000 end-page: 96 article-title: Use of physical restraints and psychotropic medications in Alzheimer special care units in nursing homes publication-title: American Journal of Public Health – volume: 53 start-page: M47 year: 1998 end-page: M52 article-title: The relationship between physical restraint removal and falls and injuries among nursing home residents. The Journals of Gerontology publication-title: Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences – volume: 10 start-page: 37 year: 2005 end-page: 39 article-title: Mobilitätsrestriktionen in Alten‐ und Pflegeheimen: eine multizentrische Beobachtungsstudie [Physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicenter observation study] publication-title: Pflege und Gesellschaft – volume: 59 start-page: 919 year: 2004 end-page: 920 article-title: Zero tolerance for physical restraints: difficult but not impossible. The Journals of Gerontology publication-title: Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences – volume: 36 start-page: 107 year: 2007 end-page: 108 article-title: How well do psychotropic medications match mental health diagnoses? A national view of potential off‐label prescribing in VHA nursing homes publication-title: Age and Ageing – volume: 13 start-page: 19 year: 1993 end-page: 23 article-title: Regression standard errors in clustered samples publication-title: Stata Technical Bulletin – volume: 34 start-page: 722 year: 1986 end-page: 727 article-title: Agitated behaviors in the elderly. II. Preliminary results in the cognitively deteriorated publication-title: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society – volume: 65 start-page: 924 year: 2007 end-page: 933 article-title: Organisational determinants of the use of physical restraints: a multilevel approach publication-title: Social Science and Medicine – volume: 363 start-page: 343 year: 2004 article-title: Down with bedrails? publication-title: Lancet – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl131 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02885.x – ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00645.x – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1093/gerona/59.9.M919 – volume: 265 start-page: 468 year: 1991 ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 article-title: Mechanical restraint use among residents of skilled nursing facilities. Prevalence, patterns and predictors publication-title: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association doi: 10.1001/jama.1991.03460040044026 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl065 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01406.x – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1007/s00391-005-0286-x – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<377::AID-SIM799>3.0.CO;2-N – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-3-5 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb04303.x – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39343.649097.55 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-6-17 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01082.x – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.030 – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 doi: 10.2105/AJPH.90.1.92 – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1001/jama.293.5.596 – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00985768 – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb02999.x – volume: 10 start-page: 37 year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 article-title: Mobilitätsrestriktionen in Alten‐ und Pflegeheimen: eine multizentrische Beobachtungsstudie [Physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicenter observation study] publication-title: Pflege und Gesellschaft – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1093/gerona/53A.1.M47 – volume: 9 start-page: 23 year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 article-title: Dementia patients in nursing homes publication-title: European Journal of Geriatrics – start-page: 104 volume-title: Frontiers of Econometrics year: 1974 ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2006.04.004 – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15473-1 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1097/00005650-200210000-00005 – volume-title: SGB XI – Pflegeversicherung. Kommentar und Rechtssammlung [SGB XI – Statutory care insurance. Comment and collection of statutes] year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 – volume: 13 start-page: 19 year: 1993 ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 article-title: Regression standard errors in clustered samples publication-title: Stata Technical Bulletin – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061240 – volume: 53 start-page: 489 year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 article-title: Why is it so hard for nurses to take off the restraints? Abstract, The 18th Congress of the International Association of Gerontology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2005. publication-title: Gerontology – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51355.x – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1007/s00391-006-0401-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 doi: 10.1007/s00391-005-0293-y – reference: 19284439 - J Clin Nurs. 2009 Apr;18(7):1078-9 |
| SSID | ssj0013223 |
| Score | 2.2403007 |
| Snippet | Aims and objectives. To investigate (1) the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive medication, (2) newly administered physical restraints,... Aims and objectives. To investigate (1) the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive medication, (2) newly administered physical restraints,... To investigate (1) the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive medication, (2) newly administered physical restraints, frequency of application of... Cross-sectional research in Germany to investigate the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive drugs at 30 elderly care nursing homes. Their... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 981 |
| SubjectTerms | Aged, 80 and over Analysis of Variance Cluster Analysis Cognition Disorders - diagnosis Cognition Disorders - epidemiology Cognition Disorders - prevention & control Cross-Sectional Studies Documentation Drug Utilization - statistics & numerical data epidemiology Evidence-based medicine Female Geriatric Assessment Germany - epidemiology Humans Kaplan-Meier Estimate Logistic Models Male nurses nursing Nursing care Nursing Evaluation Research Nursing homes Nursing Homes - organization & administration Nursing Records Older people Prevalence Psychotropic drugs Psychotropic Drugs - therapeutic use restraint Restraint, Physical - methods Restraint, Physical - utilization Risk Factors Severity of Illness Index Studies |
| Title | Restraint use among nursing home residents: cross-sectional study and prospective cohort study |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-T378DXHT-W/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2702.2008.02460.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19284433 https://www.proquest.com/docview/235012472 https://www.proquest.com/docview/67033642 https://www.proquest.com/docview/764384381 |
| Volume | 18 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1fa9swEBejY7CXdf-Xdmv1MPbmYEuyZO9ttOtCYRmUlOZNk2WJQTanxA6UPvUj9DPuk-xOtrNktFDKHgwG6YTvfCfdSaf7EfI-5soI6VVU5LmPROpElHHLI16mpS9gQVMBteTrWI5OxfE0nXb5T3gXpq0PsdpwQ8sI8zUauCnqTSNfu0-FKZFMyHiI_iQ0YBn9wxO2fqDQospLFmHVtM2knhsH2lipHqLQL25yQze92rAsHW2TWc9Qm40yGy6bYmgv_6n1-H84fkqedN4r_dSq2zPywFXPyaNux-EF-X7i6oA50dBl7WgAMqJdcgH9Mf_lKAT3iGLa1B9p4Pr31XUdksFw2FDqlpqqpMBOfwWUIoTvomkbX5LTo8-Tg1HUQThEFow7jiCc87w0qXVcidRn0sac5eCElj7z0gvr0ky5uBQ-NyUETyyzGMQlQGNBiyR_RbaqeeXeEOryMmGykMYaiOp8mkMI7Yo8gadIrGMDovrfpW1X3xxZ_qnX4hyQn0b5deibKD99MSDJivK8rfFxB5oPQSNWBGYxwxw5leqz8Rc94So7nI4m-mxAdnuV0d30UGuGx7lMKPjo_VUr2DUe1pjKzZc1jBVzUGPoQW_pocCZzLBC24C8blXx79fn4HUIzkEmQaHuzJY-_nYwxtede1Puksf9iVucvCVbzWLp3oHj1hR7wST_AP8iMyQ |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwELZQKwSXUv7a0EJ9QNyySmzHTrhVLWUp7SJVW3VvJnFsIbVk0SYrVZx4BJ6RJ-mMkyy7qEgV4hApUnaszOxM_H32eIaQ1xFXuZBOhUWWuVAkVoQpNzzkZVK6AiY05buWnI7k8FwcT5JJ1w4Iz8K09SEWC24YGf57jQGOC9KrUb50oApzIpmQ0QAA5boA3IFM7PCMLW8ptH3lJQuxbtpqWs-tI63MVeto9uvbgOgqrvUT09EjctWr1OajXA7mTTEw3_-o9vifdN4kGx2Apfutxz0m92z1hNzvFh2eks9ntvZtJxo6ry31vYxol19Av0y_Wgr8HhuZNvVb6tX-9eNn7fPBcFhf7ZbmVUlBn_4UKMUuvrOmffiMnB-9Gx8Mw66LQ2ggvqMQGJ3jZZ4Yy5VIXCpNxFkGOLR0qZNOGJukykalcFleAn9iqUEeF4OMAUeS_DlZq6aV3SbUZmXMZCFzkwOxc0kGLNoWWQxXERvLAqL6_0ubrsQ5qnyll6gO2E-j_boGnGg_fR2QeCH5rS3zcQeZN94lFgL57BLT5FSiL0bv9Zir9HAyHOuLgOz0PqO7L0StGe7oMqHgpfcWTyG0cb8mr-x0XsNYEefADwNC__ILBXgyxSJtAdlqffH322cAPATnYBPvUXdWSx9_Ohjh7Yt_ltwjD4bj0xN98mH0cYc87DfgoniXrDWzuX0JOK4pXvn4vAE7hjdD |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwELZQKxAX_qGhQH1A3LJKbCdOekMty1JgQdVW3ZtJ_COkLdlqk5WqnngEnpEnYcZJll1UpApxiBLJGcszmYnns8czhLyMuCxE6mRY5rkLRWJFmHHNQ24S40qY0KSvWvJxnI5OxNE0mXbxT3gWps0PsVpwQ8vw_2s08HPjNo187TwVhkQykUYD8Ce34Z55eHXM1ncU2rLyKQsxbdpmVM-VPW1MVdso9Yur_NBNt9bPS8O7ZNZz1IajzAbLphzoyz-SPf4flu-RO537Sl-3-naf3LDVA3KzW3J4SL4c29oXnWjosrbUVzKiXXQB_Tr_Zimgeyxj2tT71HP98_uP2keDYbc-1y0tKkOBnf4MKMUavoumbXxEToZvJgejsKvhEGqw7igEPOe4KRJtuRSJy1IdcZaDF2pc5lIntE0yaSMjXF4YQE8s04jiYqDRoEYpf0y2qnlldwi1uYlZWqaFLgDWuSQHDG3LPIarjLVlAZH951K6S3COLJ-pNaAD8lMov678JspPXQQkXlGet0k-rkHzymvEiqBYzDBITibqdPxWTbjMDqejiToNyG6vMqr7P9SK4X4uExIGvbdqBcPG3ZqisvNlDX1FnAM6DAj9yxsSvMkMU7QF5Emrir9Hn4PbITgHmXiFujZb6ujTwRgfn_4z5R659flwqD68G7_fJbf73bcofka2msXSPgcnrilfeOv8BVW3NfI |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Restraint+use+among+nursing+home+residents%3A+cross-sectional+study+and+prospective+cohort+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+clinical+nursing&rft.au=Meyer%2C+G&rft.au=Kopke%2C+S&rft.au=Haastert%2C+B&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.issn=0962-1067&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=981&rft.epage=990&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2702.2008.02460.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0962-1067&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0962-1067&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0962-1067&client=summon |