An experimental study of network effects on coordination in asymmetric games

Network structure has often proven to be important in understanding the decision behavior of individuals or agents in different interdependent situations. Computational studies predict that network structure has a crucial influence on behavior in iterated 2 by 2 asymmetric ‘battle of the sexes’ game...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 9; no. 1; p. 6842
Main Authors Broere, Joris, Buskens, Vincent, Stoof, Henk, Sánchez, Angel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 02.05.2019
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI10.1038/s41598-019-43260-0

Cover

More Information
Summary:Network structure has often proven to be important in understanding the decision behavior of individuals or agents in different interdependent situations. Computational studies predict that network structure has a crucial influence on behavior in iterated 2 by 2 asymmetric ‘battle of the sexes’ games. We test such behavioral predictions in an experiment with 240 human subjects. We found that as expected the less ‘random’ the network structure, the better the experimental results are predictable by the computational models. In particular, there is an effect of network clustering on the heterogeneity of convergence behavior in the network. We also found that degree centrality and having an even degree are important predictors of the decision behavior of the subjects in the experiment. We thus find empirical validation of predictions made by computational models in a computerized experiment with human subjects.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-43260-0